MARGARET CURRAN: Well, what we are saying, and Ed will make his own speech tomorrow, and I don’t have foresight of that… What we are saying is when you get into government, and when we come in in 2015, we won’t be able to do all that we wanted to do… Will child benefit for the wealthiest people be our top priority? I’m not sure about that.
ED MILIBAND, 6-6-2013: When it comes to the decisions of the next Labour government it won’t be our biggest priority to overturn the decisions this government has made on taking child benefit away from families earning over £50,000 a year.
We must admit, for someone who hasn’t seen the speech it’s a heck of a guess. Does anyone want to ask Ms Curran if she’s got a score forecast for Croatia vs Scotland?
It seems worth updating this piece from last September, for the 40,000 of you who weren’t around then. Today, Labour leader Ed Miliband gave a speech on his party’s welfare plans should it win the 2015 UK general election. It contained the following line:
One of the odder quirks about the BBC iPlayer is that it’ll let you rewind live TV broadcasts for up to two hours, but not radio, despite radio using vastly less bandwidth. So at the moment we can’t bring you a verified quote that Liam Byrne really just told Radio 4’s Today programme that the idea of rent controls as a solution to the UK’s housing benefit bill was “going a bit too far”.
But there’s another new Labour welfare policy that’s missing a fairly vital chunk of information this morning, which is even more worrying than the shadow Secretary of State for Work and Pensions having less intelligence, insight, principle and moral courage than a starving weasel.
Heaven’s sent us an angel, folks. Alert reader Jack Deeth is stranded far from home shores (really very far indeed) and stuck for something to do in the long winter nights, he very generously offered us his transcribing services.
We leapt on the offer with undignified haste, and you can read the first results below, in the shape of today’s interview between Margaret Curran and Andrew Neil on the Daily Politics, in which the shadow Scottish Secretary clearly and unambiguously laid out a future Labour government’s spending and welfare plans.
Please don’t make us transcribe this nine-minute trainwreck of an interview with Margaret Curran on the subject of Labour’s welfare and spending plans, from this afternoon’s edition of BBC2’s Daily Politics. We don’t know if we could take it.
Click the image to listen, if you have a high pain threshold.
Along with more direct, overt scaremongering, it’s probably fair to say that the core theme of the “Better Together” anti-independence campaign to date has been “uncertainty”. Day after day sees the media and public assailed with neurotic demands for definitive answers about every conceivable aspect of an independent Scotland that in most cases couldn’t be answered by any nation on Earth, including the UK.
The No camp disastrously overplayed its hand with the “500 questions” fiasco, which saw it subjected to literally worldwide mockery, but it suffered an arguably even more wounding blow today with the release of some figures which blew gaping holes into pretty much everything it’s spent the last 18 months saying.
From the excellent Part 1 of STV’s new documentary “Road To Referendum” (based on the book by Iain Macwhirter, out this week), Labour PM Harold Wilson and Scottish Secretary Willie Ross punt a rather familiar line four decades before Ed Miliband.
We’re sure there’s nothing at all sinister in the fact that the show was unavailable to most viewers due to an unprecedented cross-media technical failure, which also wiped out the STV news at 6pm and this evening’s Scotland Tonight, incidentally.
This morning’s Daily Record carries a story about Ed Balls’ policy speech on welfare yesterday. Commendably, the Labour-supporting paper isn’t shy of pointing out the implications of Balls’ comments:
“Scots could get welfare benefits at lower rates than people in wealthy parts of England under plans being worked on by Labour. Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls yesterday raised the idea of a regional cap on welfare, opening the door to variations in a range of social security benefits.
Balls said the welfare cap of £25,000 a year per household should be higher in London but could be lower in parts of the UK where housing is cheaper.”
We’d have been even more impressed, though, if Wings Over Scotland hadn’t revealed the reality of what Labour’s future plans meant for Scotland almost three weeks ago.
Particularly alert readers may recall a shock-horror story from the Scottish media earlier this year relating to a sharp rise in the number of people waiting over four hours for treatment in hospital A&E departments, which came complete with some dramatic (and highly misleading) graphs.
Labour’s ironic Scottish health spokeswoman Jackie Baillie poured opprobrium on the Scottish Government both for the figures and for changing the treatment-within-four-hours target from 98% to 95%, with the Tories enthusiastically joining in as usual.
So we were naturally quite curious to see what the corresponding figures for the English NHS would be, and they were finally released today.
Geri on Pick Your Poison: “That’s what happens when you agree terms, (Minsk1 & Minsk2) get the United Nations to rubber stamp it & then…” May 7, 15:25
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: ““Scotland has zero control over immigration” Bleeding obviously, if Scotland votes Reform at the next WM GE, Scotland has lots…” May 7, 15:24
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: ““a shiny shite what Mayor’s they vote” What Mayor’s what, Geri? Such a tiny little thing, yet completely and irrevocably…” May 7, 15:20
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Hae a haddie this time, Wally. And keep that free flipper still. Nae flapping doon below.” May 7, 15:15
Alf Baird on Pick Your Poison: ““who do we vote for to fix that?” Obviously, to end ‘that’ and the continued colonization of Scots we need…” May 7, 15:08
Geri on The value bet: “Aye James, Now that wouldn’t be deliberately interfering in another countries elections now would it? I couldn’t give a shiny…” May 7, 14:46
Captain Caveman on The value bet: ““Tick tock” Yeah, but that’s enough about your source material, eh pal. Tool.” May 7, 14:42
James on The value bet: “They bite every time. Bless. Comical.” May 7, 14:37
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: “I forgot about the autopsy. I’ve been thinking about the wake. Bet there will be SFA put behind the bar.” May 7, 14:37
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: ““Tick Tock”, Wally Walrus? That’s ane o the fragrant Geri’s signature lines. Just how many identities are you posting under?” May 7, 14:20
Aidan on The value bet: “Oh aye does he, and this information was provided with supporting evidence to the police who arrested and prosecuted the…” May 7, 14:14
James on The value bet: “The three yoon stooges are all oot the day eh? Funny, Phil Boswell has 2 or 3 returning officer contacts…” May 7, 14:02
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Loving your Pictish support for ATLS, Northy. OK if I gatecrash the wake on Saturday? (That’s a rhetorical question :)…” May 7, 13:43
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Are there 2 CM’s? The famous one is a cheerleader for the tunnel-skulking, lassie-torturing ham ass scum.” May 7, 13:40
Hatey McHateface on The value bet: “Here’s another fish fer ye, James. Enjoy, but mind, baith flippers above the table!” May 7, 13:35
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: “That’s a bit better, Confused. But I note you’re still being coy. Interesting that you believe it was US warmongering,…” May 7, 13:32
Hatey McHateface on Pick Your Poison: “Please revise and re-post, Confused. We need to know how to vote if we hate Dews.” May 7, 13:26
Captain Caveman on The value bet: “Yes that’s right James, it was … THEM!!! “ooo-oOOooOOO-ooOOHHH!!!”? Get the Bacofoil headgear ready, DEFCON1! (Alternatively, y’know maybe the source…” May 7, 13:14
Cynicus on Pick Your Poison: “Northcode says: 7 May, 2026 at 12:20 “VOTE FOR:” ======= Nobody! The key question here is whom to VOTE AGAINST?…” May 7, 13:12
Aidan on The value bet: “@Dan that comment was aimed at Geri not you, you at least seem to be one of the few BTL…” May 7, 13:10
Captain Caveman on Pick Your Poison: “@Cuphook Yes, it’s a major concern for many in the UK, including Scotland, and Reform is avowed to tackle it…” May 7, 13:01
Dan on The value bet: “AIdan says:”I’d guess this is all a bit of a game for you since you spend 100% of your time…” May 7, 12:51
Confused on Pick Your Poison: “Then theres the nutter parties – an abolish holyrood party (I appreciate the sentiment but – do you really think…” May 7, 12:50
Confused on Pick Your Poison: “ERECTION DAY on telly last night john curtice does not look well; the poor man looks like a cadaver what…” May 7, 12:46
Geri on Pick Your Poison: “Reform will fix nothing on immigration. That’s a global elite problem & we don’t get a vote on them. &…” May 7, 12:45
Cynicus on Pick Your Poison: “#No Votes SNP Zero For any Swinney bonehead reading this, BOTH -2 equals zero” May 7, 12:43
Geri on Pick Your Poison: “Yes. It lets them know they were rejected. They’re still counted. Not bothering to vote at all let’s them know…” May 7, 12:34
Cuphook on Pick Your Poison: “The main stimulus for voting Reform is immigration, specifically Muslim immigration. This is why I think that their vote will…” May 7, 12:22
Marie on Pick Your Poison: “Don’t know what to do about the candidate paper. They’re all bought/captured/owned by external actors. What’s the point? May vote…” May 7, 12:21
Northcode on Pick Your Poison: “Voting advice for a people seeking their liberation from an imperial coloniZer. Indigenous, liberty-seeking Scots should NOT vote – UNDER…” May 7, 12:20