A plague of fools
Sometimes people are so stupid it’s legitimately scary. For example, all the Unionist politicians in Scotland who appear to genuinely think voters won’t notice that the recent exams catastrophe affected England (run by the Tories) and Wales (run by Labour) even worse than it did Scotland, and so they keep screaming for John Swinney’s head while having nothing to say about the even worse messes bursting all over their own parties’ respective jurisdictions.
(Esler misses the fact that the “deletions” were all actually retweets of a single tweet on the Scottish Conservatives which was deleted, but the point is the same.)
It genuinely boggles our mind that anyone, let alone a professional politician whose job it is to have their finger on the public pulse, could possibly imagine they’d ever get away with such utterly brainless naked hypocrisy, apparently believing that voters have memories less than 24 hours long and enjoy having their intelligence insulted.
(Incidentally, we can’t see any good answer to the exams problem. Either you have one year of massively artificially inflated grades, with all the tricky ramifications that presents further down the line, or you have a year of grotesque injustices to thousands of blameless individual students that are logistically impossible to remedy. The former is probably the lesser of the two evils, which poses the question of why the Scottish Government was too monumentally dim to see it coming and why it wasted a week defending the latter option before inevitably caving in and doing the sensible thing it was always going to have to do and should have just done in the first place.)
But it’s not just politicians.
The above headline appeared on a little-read pro-SNP website this week, and the absurd random jumble of capitalised and uncapitalised words is the least of its worries.
Firstly, unless you DO have a 24-hour memory span 53-47 is NOT the “biggest ever lead” for independence. Hell, it’s not even the biggest lead of summer 2020. The two previous polls, in June and July, put Yes ahead by a higher margin (54-46), and the biggest EVER lead is still the 59-41 one recorded in a survey just over four years ago.
And there was also another 54-46 the same month, so this week’s YouGov figures are actually the FIFTH-biggest lead ever.
(The National, reliably, nevertheless reacted to support going from 54% to 53% with the same “support for independence soars” phrasing that it uses for any two figures regardless of their actual sizes.)
But it got worse. Because SNP NEC member and female-penis advocate Doug Daniel popped up in the comments of the same website that once published this:
to make his own audacious attempt at usurping the World Hubris Record.
It’s worth spending a moment or two unpicking that drivel.
“There’s nothing in the UK’s uncodified constitution that compels them to give us a section 30 order, but that’s no different to the situation last time. Folk say they only granted the s30 order in 2012 because they were sure they were going to win, but that’s far too simplistic. It explains the timing, but not the act itself. You don’t fight battles you don’t need to fight, even if you’re sure you’ll win.”
Firstly, we might note how touched we are by such faith in David Cameron’s infallibility. The idea that the former PM might simply have made a misjudgement appears quite inconceivable to Mr Daniel’s analysis. But Cameron thought – as he also mistakenly did with the Brexit referendum – that holding a vote and winning it convincingly would put the matter to bed and kill off the SNP’s ability to weaponise the (valid) grievance of being denied a democratic vote.
Since the SNP had just smashed an electoral system expressly designed to prevent any party – and especially them – from getting a majority, Cameron had grounds for belief that continuing the refusals of the previous four years was only making them stronger. And since he had no way of knowing what they might do if that support kept growing – particularly with a gambler like Alex Salmond in charge – allowing a vote when Yes was barely at 30% probably seemed the least risky strategy.
But that concern doesn’t apply with Nicola Sturgeon at the helm of the party. Boris Johnson already knows what she’ll do if her demands are refused – nothing. Theresa May turned her down flat in 2017 and she did nothing. Johnson himself did the same in 2019 and she did nothing.
She did nothing for three years after the Brexit vote in 2016, now she’s doing nothing because of COVID-19, and she says she’ll do nothing until not just the pandemic but its economic aftermath is over, which is years away.
Then we get more baseless fantasy:
“Clearly, they felt they had to nip independence in the bud. That’s inconsistent with apparently being able to say “no” forever, which would mean every single person in Scotland could vote SNP and they’d just keep sticking two fingers up at us with impunity.”
Well, no, it just isn’t. Circumstances change. Something that was sensible in 2011 isn’t necessarily sensible in 2020 when the whole world’s been turned upside down in the intervening period. The UK was still in the EU in 2011. Oil was still selling for a few quid. Australia, and more alarmingly Siberia and Alaska, weren’t on fire. Donald Trump wasn’t the President of the USA and the whole planet wasn’t wearing facemasks.
Every single person in Scotland ISN’T going to vote for the SNP – at best they’re going to get a bit more than half – but it would make very little meaningful difference to Boris Johnson if they did. He will only ever grant a referendum if the consequences of not doing so are worse for him than the consequences of doing so, and it’s all but impossible to imagine a scenario where that could ever be the case.
Because what could those negative consequences be? We know that Nicola Sturgeon will never declare UDI. We know that she’ll never hold a “wildcat” referendum (partly because she’d never try and partly because it’d fail if she did, since there’s no way to bypass Unionist-controlled councils). We know that she’ll never endorse mass civil disobedience, because it’d be domestically toxic and have little practical force. And we know she’ll never go to court to establish Holyrood’s legal right to hold a vote, because if she was going to do that she’d have done it four years ago instead of wasting all the time on a futile, dishonest attempt to deny England and Wales democracy.
And nobody else is coming to help. We know from the experience of Catalonia that the UN won’t step in, and the EU certainly won’t because we’re not a member any more. So what on Earth can Sturgeon – or indeed Scotland as a whole – threaten Johnson with? A six-seat reduction in his majority? Uproar in the famously pro-indy media? An Ian Blackford speech in the House Of Commons that simply never ends?
Yet still the empty wishful thinking pours forth:
“Even Theresa May’s ‘now is not the time’ mantra conceded it was a matter of when, not if. The official lines from Tory HQ today say there’ll be no referendum, but their behaviour says otherwise. Why do they need to ‘fight for the union’ if they’re 100% in charge of whether another referendum happens or not? Why the panicky replacement of Jackson Carlaw? None of it makes sense if they can truly resist the political pressure forever.”
Weirdly, having earlier attacked indy supporters who take Johnson at his word, Daniel now does exactly the same with his predecessor in Downing St.
May said “now is not the time” because she didn’t want to openly announce that the Scots were slaves with no recourse to democracy. We all knew she meant “never”. Tories “fight for the union” because it’s their job, because it gives them something to say to gee up their own supporters and because their lives would be marginally easier if support went back down below 50%. They sacked Carlaw because he was such an idiot it was embarrassing and there’s a Holyrood election coming up that they’d rather not be humiliated in any more than they can help. There is no rocket science here.
“The thought of another SNP majority – bigger than in 2011 even – has got them in meltdown a year before the election. They couldn’t make the situation more obvious unless they started wearing t-shirts saying ‘SNP majority = IndyRef2’.”
Let’s test that. We’re happy to bet Doug Daniel £1,000 that Boris Johnson will not grant a Section 30 while Nicola Sturgeon is the leader of the SNP, unless legally compelled to do so by a court. We’ll put our money where our mouth is when it comes to our track record of analysis and prediction. Let’s see if Doug will.
Because until someone in the SNP or their loyal and obedient cheerleader squad can tell us what we actually have to threaten the UK government with, we’re going to keep pointing out the reality that independence is going nowhere.
Stu
Well thought out post. Putting your money where your mouth is always a compelling sign of belief and confidence. I wouldn’t take your bet up and I am a gambler as well.
If we promised not to sue for reparations, that might do it?
In life I have found that wishful thinking is a terrible thing, and when it comes to this, too many people are having a bit of wishful thinking. They just refuse to see what is so plainly in front of them.
Two quotes spring to mind- the old Scottish one of “he either fears his fate too much…” and a more recent one: “ever get the feeling you’ve been had?”
Meanwhile (don’t laugh, you may do yourself a mischief) –
“How George Galloway and I plan to save the Union”
link to archive.is
Also…
Huh?
I’d quite like to see a list, even if it’s toty.
Ian – Except Boris, probably!
The Bruce didn’t park the struggle during the First War of Independence when the Great Famine devastated all Europe in 1315-1317.
Scots didn’t park the struggle during the Second War of Independence when the Black Death arrived in Europe in 1347.
Sturgeon though, parked the struggle indefinitely because of covid. What a lovely bus though!
So if Stu’s correct, and I can’t think of anything that I can throw in the ring that might counter his points, except maybe a way out of this horrendous union via the Treaty of Union, and on that route I’m not sure, it basically means we’ll have another five years of Sturgeon at the helm talking a good game on independence but not actually doing anything positive to achieve it.
I’m slightly concerned that someone in the heart of the SNP is making statements that strongly imply it is pro-indy voters who are to blame here. It reminds me slightly of Labour for the last 10 years or so (we don’t need to change anything, we just need the dim voters to try harder to understand our message).
However, Rev’s post is a little dispiriting in that he lists what won’t work. I’m inclined to agree but having a referendum that council’s resist could surely be a stage in a process that ups the ante, assuming the current S30 court case fails (the crowd-funded one).
“George S Gordon says:
14 August, 2020 at 1:58 pm
Meanwhile (don’t laugh, you may do yourself a mischief) –
“How George Galloway and I plan to save the Union”
George, I’m sure Galloway once said “If you see me standing under the Union Jack shoulder to shoulder with the Tories shoot me.”
I have great admiration for Galloway’s work in Palestine and Iraq, but the man is consumed by hatred for the SNP and Scottish independence, and I’m afraid he’d now jump onto any bandwagon available just to get back into politics, pity that, he’d have been an invaluable asset at Holyrood in an independent Scotland.
All of which is why the wokerati want to keep Joanna Cherry out of Holyrood.
To be fair if I was getting £100k a year plus expenses . I would be happy to F**k about at WM for another 4 years. Since Independence is going nowhere fast.
I think the pain of a hard Brexit will awaken those with shallow pockets.
Who knows? Henry VIII Powers might just kick Nicola up the arse.
George S Gordon@1:58
Thanks for posting that link.
So George Galloway is now lunching and collaborating with Tory old Etonians. Well well.
YouGov helpfully publish a breakdown of the headline numbers. The poll this week didn’t include 16 & 17 year olds. 18 to 24 year olds stated that they would vote Yes on a ratio of 79:21. If you make two relatively safe assumptions; a) 16 & 17 year olds will turn out at the same rate as 18 year olds b) 16 & 17 year olds will vote around 80% for Yes, and run the numbers (using Population pyramid spreadsheets from the nrscotland website), the breakdown for Yes:No becomes 54:46 ( the same as the last two Panelbase polls. I’ve no idea whether Panel base poll 16 & 17 year olds.
Granted, Sturgeon won’t countenance civil disobedience, but if she shrugs her shoulders when Johnson says “No S30 order”, she would no longer be controlling events. Johnson would effectively be committing to this whole “second act of Union” nonsense with all the anti-democratic implications entailed.
16 to 24 year olds are 80% committed to Independence. In the age group 25 to 49, there’s a healthy 16% lead for Indy. A refusal to grant S30 by Johnson would only outrage a portion of the uncommitted. The numbers (from the UKs perspective) would become more stark.
So, we’re in a scenario where around 80% of the population under the age of 30 are committed to Independence. There’s another term for the population in the age group 16 to 30, and it’s “fighting age”.
George Galloway and old Etonian Jamie Blackett could form a new party. The Bedfellows Newfangled Party. Or BNP for short. Party symbol – big union jack.
I read that Bella article the other night (out of desperate boredom) – it seemed … triumphalist nonsense with the usual “lets bitch about wings” chucked in.
– not worthy of a pisstake; nice spot, the unconventional capitalisation strategy
It is just so ridiculous to have Leonard, Davidson and Rennie screaming for the head of John Swinney when not a word being said about Williamson and the lib dem/labour in Wales they made complete fools of themselves yesterday and everybody and their dog knows it.
If you want a laugh watch Leonards opening for the No Confidence vote and if you want to be impressed watch Michael Russell closing for the Government- don’t bother with Ruthie she was just having a ‘moan-fest’ – nothing new there.
Watching what is happening in England just proves to the whole country what idiots labour, lib dems and tories are in Scotland and leaves them, or should leave them with very red faces.
the 59% yes poll after the brexit vote was a complete outsider. the recent 53% poll for yes was from panel base. an unfriendly yes polster. What it did do was confirm the trend in support for indy is above 50%
“Theresa May turned her down flat in 2017 and she did nothing”
theresa said “now is not the time” to the bbc but when the actual official request came from holyrood, theresa called a ge before the 30 day period for an official reply from wm elapsed.
the snp got 38% in that election. hardly the basis for a revolution, indyref2 was sidelined because of that.
“May said “now is not the time” because she didn’t want to openly announce ”
that’s true, and the legality of the position hasnt been tested, it suits both sides for that to remain so, but peat worrier posited that the SC would come down in favour of WM. so you are probably correct in your analysis.
I pretty much agree with this article, bojo will refuse a s30 “officially”. to that end, i’m not sure why we should continue down the road demanding a referendum?
what is paramount is to convert polling figures into actual voting figures. I cant see how a referendum will do that if the councils block it and unionists boycott it
the only option i can see is to use the holyrood election. regadless of what nicola does, it will be seen by everyone as a defacto plebiscite on indy.
I would encourage the snp to adopt this as a campaign strategy.
the face off is coming, that cant be avoided now
I miss you on Twitter x
@schrodingers cat
To use 2021 as a plebiscite, wouldn’t SNP (sometime before campaigning starts) have to have escalated things? I mean the electorate right now is hearing that we just don’t have high enough polling numbers and Covid19 is the priority. They are hearing these things from the SNP. So, why would they support the sudden jump to that election being a plebiscite? Hopefuly you understand what I’m getting at and what the SNP need to start doing very soon.
@Republicofscotland
Not necessarily.
eg Were Salmond or Cherry to win Glasgow South side with an additional 10% swing to the real SNP on the regional ballot (or labour to get in between the two with 5% swing on the regional list) then Angus Robertson could become the new FM.
(which is indeed ludicrous given that the leaders of the other parties will all get in on their lists, but could work in favour of indy regardless if Nicola could be persuaded to declare indy in advance (just in case)
Hit the nail on the head :
“Karen Allan says:
14 August, 2020 at 1:52 pm
If we promised not to sue for reparations, that might do it?”.
I would suggest we all start talking about TRUTH, RECONCILIATION and REPARATIONS after indy. I want to see Johnston in the Hague for crimes against humanity.
Also if you work for MI5/6 and lie during indy then you face a post-indy trial. Politicians who lie face the same, as do yoon churnalists. If you vote but don’t live in Scotland or only have a Scottish holiday home then the pokey beckons.
If I was Glenn, Kaye and Brian I’d start having porridge every morning.
I think we must start pointing out we have ways of getting even.
Scotland’s motto :’NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT’ really means ‘no one injures us and gets away with it.’
I think it’s worth re-posting this.
Independent thinker: Boris Johnson will not grant a Section 30.
SNP loyalist: Yes he will.
Independent thinker: No he won’t as he doesn’t have to?
SNP loyalist: Yes he does.
Independent thinker: There are no rules, regulations or laws that compel him to do so.
SNP loyalist: But he will.
Independent thinker: I understand that you feel that opinion polls showing a majority in favour of independence will force him to change his mind but that is just wishful thinking.
SNP loyalist: No it isn’t.
Independent thinker: Expecting Boris Johnson to change his mind because it was the right thing to do would require him to have some integrity and he doesn’t have any.
SNP loyalist: Yes he does.
Independent thinker: He doesn’t care what Scotland thinks.
SNP loyalist: Yes he does.
Independent thinker: No he doesn’t.
SNP loyalist: Yes he does!
Independent thinker: This isn’t a debate, this is just contradiction.
SNP loyalist: No it isn’t.
Independent: Yes it is.
SNP loyalist: No it isn’t
Independent thinker: I don’t think we have anything left to discuss.
SNP loyalist: Yes we do.
———————————————————————————————
This debate has been brought to you by Monty Python.
crisiscult says:
assuming the current S30 court case fails (the crowd-funded one).
————–
i thought this case was to establish that we didnt need a s30? we already have the right to hold an advisory referendum?
————————–
To use 2021 as a plebiscite, wouldn’t SNP (sometime before campaigning starts) have to have escalated things?
———————-
no and yes,
no, people will view the holyrood election as an indy plebiscite regardless of what the snp do
yes, i hope the snp do go down this route.
bear in mind, if the snp do this and dont get 50%+ indy is over for 5 years. if they back indyref2 instead and get 45%, it still gives them momentum towards indyref2. I think they will try and do both.
—————————————
I mean the electorate right now is hearing that we just don’t have high enough polling numbers and Covid19 is the priority
——————-
really? polling numbers are the same for everyone. numbers are numbers, last 4 have indy and snp well into the 50%+ range.
focusing uniquely on covid annoys indy and unionists in equal amounts, but since support for indy/snp continues to rise for the moment it is probably the right tactic.
but i still maintain that we are coming down to the wire and a face off is unavoidable. many folk think bojo will still say no, i think they may be right, but perhaps bojo is deluded enough to believe his own rhetoric and say yes.
either way, when we reach that point, we will need a public vote of 50%+ otherwise the no from bojo will be certain
Brilliant, Rev. Says it all. I could weep. I cannot believe such naive stupidity. What is wrong with the Scots?
Astonished says:
Scotland’s motto :’NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT’ really means ‘no one injures us and gets away with it.’
————–
i prefer the modern OED translation of “Don’t Fuck Wi’ Me”
In terms of the councils all they need to do is pass a law making it illegal to impede of fail to run an election or plebiscite duly passed by the Holyrood parliament (or WM for that matter) & make the governing council group personally liable to a big fine, gaol and/or disbarment with commissioners sent in to get the poll done.
What’s to dislike or illiberal about that? It is a defence of the democratic process against wreckers in town halls. Surely it will never be necessary to use it? One on the books it won’t be. If the SNP have a majority, or they could get the ISP/Greens to help, who can stop it? Doesn’t violate human rights law.
If they really were planning for Plan B as Business for Scotland tried to persuade us recently that would have been done already in same way sedition was removed from the statutes in Scotland in advance of indyref1 just to stop it being abused.
I remember when Doug Daniel was an indy canvasser who used to post amusing Jazz Hands selfies.
It remains his best work to date.
Female-penis advocate Daniel spoke at our branch meeting. He was deeply unimpressive.
Guessing is okay , when you really have to , or for a bet , or when you’re with pals having a laugh but seriously when it comes to guessing when the SNP will start their next Scottish independence campaign guessing continuously is of no benefit , I mean let’s face it , sooner or later you are going to be wrong.
When all you say repeatedly is that SNP do not intend to have another Scottish independence referendum you are guessing and it is of no benefit whatsoever.
Everyone knows you’re guessing .
I can remember when Dougie was your bestest most loyal reader and admire,your number1 fan.He used to live in the real world. What happened to him? Did the wokus pocus,kidnap him and take him to a re-education camp in deepest darkest Donside?
@Breastplate
nice speech, however it is an argument about what bojo will do IF we win a majority????
I dont know the result of this argument but I believe campaigning to ensure we have a majority 50%+ when we eventual need to confront bojo?
or is the end of your argument really…
Independent thinker: I don’t think we have anything left to discuss.
SNP loyalist: Yes we do.
Independent thinker: no, i’m right, there is no point in even trying
SNP loyalist: Ach, yer right enough, thanks for pointing that out before i started to waste my time campaigning.
Independent thinker: aye, pointless voting snp
SNP loyalist: and Independent thinker: SCOTTISH LABOUR! aye, things can only get better… 🙂 smiles all round eh?
The answer to the question with which this article ends is perfectly simple, and why the movement has pretty much buried it is a total mystery.
As has always been the case, universally recognized even by London, though now meticulously ignored by the SNP and most of Indy, Scotland may leave the Union whenever it wishes by a majority of its MPs seceding from Westminster and constituting themselves as the parliament of an independent Scotland. Democratic legitimacy for that step would come from a majority of the votes in a general election, whether Holyrood or Westminster, on an appropriate manifesto.
So despite the SNP’s servile silence on the fact, it can turn any such election into an independence plebiscite and proceed over London’s head. That is perfectly legal, constitutional democratic and peaceful, respects the sovereignty of the Scottish people, and would be recognised by London and by the rest of the world.
It is only by seriously threatening to use that step that the Scottish Government might compel London to give permission for a referendum. But the chance only comes at election, so that means May next year or remain impotent for at least three more years after that.
The problem is very much SNP messaging …
It was NS that stated 1. The way to achieve indy is via an indyref 2. indyref need a section 30 and therefore Scottish independence needed WM consent.
We Never heard this b4 2014. And Salmond never conceded the need for a s30. But NS has not only conceded the need for a s30 but also in effect conceded the need for WM agreement to Scotland becoming independent.
NS then spend the last 3.5 years trying to stop Brexit
And will spend the next parliament using Covid as an excuse to do nothing about independence
Whose side is she on?
Re:
‘ the question of why the Scottish Government was too monumentally dim to see it coming and why it wasted a week defending the latter option before inevitably caving in and doing the sensible thing’
I think the end result was the best possible for the children in a messy situation
If ScotGov had gone for thIs solution initially ALL of the political low life would be throwing mud at the kids and belittling their achievements to gain political points.
By allowing the SQA to moderate the results and then backing down under ‘pressure’ from the low life Unionists it makes it harder (but not impossible) for the Unionists to trash the kids.
I don’t think it was a ‘cunning master plan’ by John Swinney but it has resulted in the least bad outcome for the children
SC,
It’s not a speech, it’s just a bit of satirical commentary on what I believe is actually happening right now.
To answer your question, there’s no end written because we’re not there yet.
Good article.
I think it is fair to say that every government fucked up the exams results. Don’t try pinning the blame on the respective education bodies, the governments are responsible as they signed off the moderation methods.
As to Sturgeon, I don’t think she wants the responsibility of having to lead Scotland through the turmoil that will surely arise if independence happens, given the clusterfuck that Brexit is turning out to be. Anyone who thinks there would be a smooth transition is deluded.
nobody else is coming to help. We know from the experience of Catalonia that the UN won’t step in, and the EU certainly won’t because we’re not a member any more.
————
i’m glad you said that stu, it is self evident to me that this is the case. I know that appealing to the UN/EU, a policy much loved by Robert Peffers and Breeks is likely to be a complete waste of time. Not that i would oppose such an action mind, indeed, i’d probably crowd fund such action. I just dont hold out much hope for any real result from such action.
by all means, people can try it but such actions should only run in tandem with other actions, eg CD. Plan for the worst and hope for the best etc.
@Breastplate
there is an end written, election day. it is an end in itself.
what happens the day after… is a new beginning either way..
SC,
I agree that the SNP should do all it can for some sort of plebiscite but I’m pretty sure you and I both will be disappointed come election day however I won’t be surprised.
It will also still not be the end.
SC, I should add that if I’m the one that is surprised come election day and you were right all along then I will be delighted.
On the subject of asking for a S30 again and again.
link to youtube.com
@ RevStu Agree that there’s no ideal solution to the exams situation – although I think in the SQU appeal process would have resolved a lot of the issues if it could have been stuck to. But surely the SNP have played this the only way they could? 2 options – 1.Go with moderated grades and know that if political/public pressure gets too much you have a fall back / solution in place. 2. Issue grades based on teacher estimate, get hammered for destroying credibility of results and have no way to resolve it as you can’t possibly take back the better grades. And (in theory) Option 1 should rule out Tory/Lab/Lib mounds of grade inflation. In theory.
@breastplate
if we get 50%+ and bojo says no, it will be an end. the end of the democratic road, the end of devolution.
it will be the end of this journey we have been on for the last 9 years. everything we have done, we have used the democratic process to further our aim of an independent scotland. if we finally achieve that aim and the answer is still no,
you will find it difficult to encourage folk to crowd fund flags, wbb’s, leaflets, bill boards, rally and march…
whats the point?.
it may not be THE end but it will be an end.
dont down play it breastplate, we are coming down to the wire. the moves in this chess game have had one destination.
we are very nearly there
SC,
I agree that these are crucial times regarding the independence movement, I am cynical however that we will make the best of the situation we have.
I expect that absolutely nothing will happen regarding our progress to self determination.
That’s it, nothing eventful, nothing cataclysmic just boring old nothing.
@breastplate
it isnt a question of being right, it is about weighing up probabilities, eg in the past the questions were, do we go for indyref2 and risk theresa calling a ge in the middle of it, or an euref2 happening??
these options, chess moves if you like have been used up.
there are very few moves or choices left to either side, as such, the future possibilities are also reduced
the train cant and wont wander from the track unless it is derailed
Maybe a collective gnashing of teeth at worst.
SC,
The train won’t be derailed because it’s not moving.
So what is your solution ?
Great post and doing what you do best. I agreed a fair bit with David Pratt’s column when I read it earlier but justified criticism of your own side is absolutely necessary even if it gives ammunition to the opponent’s team. The SNP is so slow in moving on anything now though even when it tries to change tack. It’s hard to believe it used to seem a nimble, oiled, political apparatus since it appears now a rusty, clogged in mire old dinosaur of a tank. Keep up with great writing like that, they need to hear it.
Breastplate says:
I am cynical however that we will make the best of the situation we have.
I expect that absolutely nothing will happen regarding our progress to self determination.
———————-
I think that, while we have made mistakes, we are in a strong position today. Catalunya made mistakes too, i wonder what their thoughts are on their own moves?
as to the future, options are limited on both sides
1. more about covid is certain
2. Oct, i think this is the cut off for some eu/uk brexit deal. If it is no deal, some irrelevant and very limited deal of some kind will be invented to cover both sides asses
3. we hold holyrood election before jan 1st or after it in may.
thats the options, there are pros and cons for either option in point 3. but it is an option open for us to decide.
beyond that, all i can say is i doubt 1st jan 2021 will be anything but boring and uneventful.
stock up on popcorn mon ami. (and bog roll etc)
Breastplate says:
The train won’t be derailed because it’s not moving.
————
nae man can tether time nor tide
Excellent interview with two renowned epidemiologists. It is a few weeks old but very relevant right now.
link to tinyurl.com
They talk about the foolish and ultimately futile strategy of total suppression (the one that is being pushed by people like devi sridhar who has huge influence over nicola and thus the SG), unless of course you plan on shutting down the country forever like NZ has done, consequences be damned. Thats why you get wild knee jerk reactions like today where nicola has been reported to have forced the UK gov to add France to the quarantine list.
@schrodingers cat says:
14 August, 2020 at 4:06 pm
“the train cant and wont wander from the track unless it is derailed”
I think you could have used a better analogy.
SC,
Here’s hoping you’re right.
I have no idea if the SNP have various scenarios planned.
Does anyone?
If they do have a plan, should they announce it now so the Brits can work against it?
Or should they keep quiet whilst the Tories are wrecking the union?
Another excellent article. This belief that some in the SNP, including Nicola Sturgeon that Boris ‘cannot refuse’ a section 30, if they are re-elected, is such hogwash.
Nicola Sturgeon has not done one single thing in six years, to advance independence. Nothing.
Yet still the SNP peddle these absolute lies about a section 30. It is such baloney.
All my life, until NS took over the SNP, it was accepted FACT, even by the Tories (and even the most extreme unionists), that for independence, all we had to do was return a pro indy majority of MP’s from Scotland to Westminster. That is the case right now, and has been for many years. So why are we not independent?? because a certain person called NICOLA STURGEON decided that such a pro indy majority was no longer acceptable.
It wasn’t the Tories who created these obstacles, it wasn’t ‘better together’, or ‘Scotland in union’, or the Labour party, or even number 10. No, the people who decided that what has been for my entire life, the accepted route to independence is no longer valid, was the SNP. Nobody asked them to do this, they did it all by themselves, for no particularly good reason.
It was Nicola Sturgeon who declared that the ONLY route to independence was via a referendum. It was Nicola Sturgeon who declared that a referendum could ONLY be held with a valid section 30 agreement.
Nicola is all talk, and NO action. Somebody above asked what side she is really on, and sadly, I now very much think it isn’t independence. Oh, yes, she talks long and hard about how much she wants independence, but anybody can say that. It is actions that count and she has done nothing, but even worse, despite her lack of action being highlighted, she has doubled down on her inaction, to do even less for independence. The latest of a long line of excuses being COVID.
Meanwhile, under her watch, Scotland is about to be forcibly removed from the EU wholly against our wishes, with absolutely enormous economic damage coming down the line, like an express train. It is as obvious as can be, that Westminster is about to use Brexit, in order to remove any and all relevant or useful powers from the Scottish parliament. What will Nicola Sturgeon do then??? I’ll tell you, Sweet f*** all. And more to the point, Boris knows it. Indeed Westminster has become emboldened BECAUSE Nicola Sturgeon refuses to take action. They know she will do nothing. Oh, she’ll moan about it, and Iain Blackford will tell the house of commons that Scotland will ‘simply not accept it’, but nothing will be done.
Power is taken, but never given. No country ever achieved independence, by meekly sitting back and asking if they can maybe have permission to hold a referendum. Westminster is NOT listening, and as RevSTU rightly points out, there is absolutely no downside for Boris to keep refusing.
I don’t know what NS is thinking about, but I do know, it is most certainly NOT Scottish independence.
@beaker
re the train, mmm it didnt occur to me but it remains
very apt
i refer to what happens on jan 1st
we have had years of experts on both sides telling us what will or wont happen.
if things are really bad, it could be used to delay or cancel he2021
but as far as i can see, holding holyrood election before or after jan 1st is the only option open to us
Someone once said. We believe what we want to believe, and once we believe something, it becomes a self-fulfilling truth.
It won’t matter how much evidence you put up in front of those people they’ll still believe that Sturgeon will bring us independence, even though her past actions, or lack of them on the indyfront say differently.
“The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you’ve got it made.”
Jean Giraudoux (or George Burns)
You’d have to be bonkers to disagree with that.
“I don’t know what NS is thinking about, but I do know, it is most certainly NOT Scottish independence.”
Well said Robert Louis, as for the above, keeping her party in power is Sturgeon’s main goal everything else comes second apart from independence, it only gets mentioned to rally the troops when an election is due. Expect to hear far more from her and her clique on independence between now and next May, after that it will once again fall off the radar.
And… more to the point. If we for a second accept that Nicola Sturgeon is sincere in her wish for Scottish independence, and that the ONLY route is via section 30 and referendum, then why isn;t she making an absolute stink about it. Why is she and all her cabinet minister not raising this over and over and over again. Why isn’t Iain Blackford and every single SNP in Westminster not rasining this and only this, in every single question?
If they were serious about wanting a section 30, they would do all of the above, but they don’t. Section 30 is an excuse, no more, no less.
When was the last time you saw NS demand a section 30? Seriously? I’ll tell you, NEVER. It just has not happened on any occasion, yet she tells us that it is vital for independence. If the SNP genuinely wanted to hold a referendum, they would be demanding a section 30 until Boris’s ears bled, but they don’t.
The SNP leadership are actually quite happy to have their preferred route to independence blocked. It suits them just fine.
This ‘play nice and good things will come attitude ‘ is so patronising when we see Trump and Johnston in power and Tory hypocrisy, backstabbing and mendacity played out and celebrated every day in our media.
Doug Daniel made a choice to publicly disavow WoS and seek affirmation with his woky pals. His cheeky chappy persona quickly falls away when he is challenged, like all the martyred footsoldiers, who think you owe them a vote because they got wet, took a selfie and put a soggy leaflet through your door.
He actually believes that he and the rest of the SNP NEC know what Independence voters want. He also thinks SNP votes are guaranteed. That is a very dangerous position to take into an election.
I see Dani Garavelli has locked her Twitter account. She appears to have assumed the role of a journo Joan of Arc to some, albeit a pathetic tremulous squeaky one. In reality she is merely the cipher for the vicious, lying, ambitious women of a faction of the SNP.
Are people not being nice about her smears and distortions?
Independence is far too important to leave to the likes of Sturgeon and her clique, the grassroots movements and AUOB movements must put pressure on her if she fails to deliver, simply putting independence into her manifesto isn’t enough. If Johnson won’t budge on the S30 she must act, and we who put her and her party in office must compel her to act.
Organised demos outside Bute House, Holyrood, her home,and her constituency until the penny drops. Change won’t come without action her credibility on the independence front is fast running out.
Robert Louis says:
Power is taken, but never given.
————–
how?
feel free to show us all how you intend to take power?
@ Denise
‘Whose side is she on?’
Yes, I think most of us have had those momentary thoughts. So much hostile intent being paraded by Westminster to the delight of tories here and the party created to fight for independence do so little and show so little fight back. Obviously something massively wrong, unless she has set a trap of some kind for them to walk into. Maybe she’s playing possum, who knows? Cherry and Salmond are also pretty quiet now as well.
The reason for giving the s30 was also because a similar court case being raised right now may have been needed then. The Edinburgh agreement makes it clear that there’s no conceding that it is a necessity simply that there’ll be no dispute about implementing the result should it be Yes.
The manifesto commitment was interesting in that it wasn’t to actually secure independence. Rather it was to seek Scotland’s permission for Holyrood to negotiate independence on its part. Technically that might simply be a transfer of power rather than a mandate to use it. So from then on Holyrood cold hold referenda on independence at any point in time and then negotiate.
An s30 is not needed to hold a referendum. It’s needed to implement the result in English Law as at that point Scots law would be fully under the control of Holyrood.
In theory the UK could evolve into a version of the EU with a tighter agreement on defence foreign policy but all laws being entirely the responsibility of it’s constituent parliaments. But that’s never going to happen and I wouldn’t believe a word any unionist said about Devo-Max or near autonomy.
ros
if bojo says no, what can nicola actually do? really? explain
i maintain if we get to this point then it isnt the job of politicians to continue the fight
its yours and mine
had ghandi even stepped on the cracks in the pavement the brits would have arrested him in a heart beat. india would today still be a colony
our politicians and reps also have to be squeeky clean give bojo an excuse and he will take it.
we on the other hand are not politicians. i represent no one but my self
same as all of you
Another thing that bugs me is The League Against Cruel Sports claims that Sturgeon’s rich estate buddies (Bennie Higgins link) are killing around 250,000 wild animals in Scotland every year. From the Hare culls to the Raven culls, to the killing of Hen Harriers and all manner of eagles, not to mention estate traps that kill hedgehogs weasels and small birds indiscriminately yet very little is done to protect our native animals which are killed so that a few chinless wonders can blast Grouse with their shotguns.
In this department alone the SNP have failed miserably.
“schrodingers cat says:
14 August, 2020 at 5:10 pm
ros
if bojo says no, what can nicola actually do? really? explain”
SC.
Just read it.
link to craigmurray.org.uk
@ SilverDarling
‘His cheeky chappy persona quickly falls away when he is challenged, like all the martyred footsoldiers, who think you owe them a vote because they got wet, took a selfie and put a soggy leaflet through your door.’
As accurate a description as I’ve seen. Never met him but going by online reactions I agree. I remember a few years ago seeing him and Mark McDonald I think it was having an argument with a woman who held her own. McDonald backed down but he kept going and afterwards said something like ‘9 years and never lost an argument on the internet yet’. I thought at the time typical arrogant immature male who thinks he’s alpha male and king of the heap. People like him, male and female, forget all the footsoldiers who’ve gone before in far harder times for the party. They came along in time to ride the cusp of a wave, they didn’t do the slog when it was hard and when it gets hard again they’ll bugger off.
More and more all the options are being taken away until all that’s left is the Irish solution…
The writing was on the wall, when Scotland voted Remain and the Scottish Parliament did not defend this beyond a few weasily words of protest.
The writing on the wall became huge graffiti when the MSPs went begging unelected Lords to respect democracy. Even though that’s quite a funny contradiction in itself.
I would not give a single current MSP of any party as much as the smell off my keech, never mind my vote for Holyrood 2021, such is my contempt for every single one of them.
“Why am I here”? I was asked yesterday. I support independence.
I won’t give my support to British colonial administrators, which is what MSPs are. (Alex Salmond’s SNP were a one-off).
The chances of indy via the Scottish Parliament from Sturgeon’s SNP are zero.
Indy supporters need to stop focusing on MSPs or MPs and instead focus on how to exit the British system of pretend democracy.
Playing the British game will never end the British game: it just keeps it running.
@schrodingers cat says:
14 August, 2020 at 4:41 pm
“but as far as i can see, holding holyrood election before or after jan 1st is the only option open to us”
I know what you meant about the train, just thought the timing was a wee bit off.
There will be no election before May next year for one reason: COVID. Any election is likely to be held in the winter months, smack bang in the middle of the flu season. Most of the restrictions would have to be lifted. Then the media will start reporting rising cases of hospitalisation (maybe flu, maybe COVID) and there will sadly be deaths. Imagine 6 weeks of that? The SNP would lose votes, perhaps enough to cripple them in the next parliament session.
I think the Greens may be in for a shock however. They are now seen as the SNP poodles much as were the Lib Dems to the Tories.
Schrodingers Cat
If you’re wrong about Sturgeon and there’s nothing in her past actions on Scottish independence to suggest otherwise, it won’t mean anything if you say I was wrong and others were right, because by then we’ll all have been sold down the river, and Scotland along with it.
There’s far too much at stake right now for Scottish independence to be left in the hands of Sturgeon, whose track record on it suggests no future movement at all.
I really, really, really hope I’m wrong and you’re right and you can give it to me rotten if that turns out to be the case, but her actions ultimately speak louder than her words on independence, and I for one see none.
@ros
I’m well aware of craigs proposal
here it is again
The Scottish Parliament should then convene a National Assembly of all nationally elected Scottish representatives – MSPs, MPs and MEPs. That National Assembly should declare Independence, appeal to other countries for recognition, reach agreements with the rump UK and organise a confirmatory plebiscite. That is legal, democratic and consistent with normal international practice.
which is fine, but it assumes other countries, eg the eu and the un will agree?
this is what stu says in this article
“nobody else is coming to help. We know from the experience of Catalonia that the UN won’t step in, and the EU certainly won’t because we’re not a member any more.”
i think he may be right, but my point is, we campaign until we reach this point.
if nicola has a public vote with 50%+ support, other countries are more likely to listen to here
this is what i posted up thread
“i’m glad you said that stu, it is self evident to me that this is the case. I know that appealing to the UN/EU, a policy much loved by Robert Peffers and Breeks is likely to be a complete waste of time. Not that i would oppose such an action mind, indeed, i’d probably crowd fund such action. I just dont hold out much hope for any real result from such action.
by all means, people can try it but such actions should only run in tandem with other actions, eg CD. Plan for the worst and hope for the best etc.”
your post was
“Organised demos outside Bute House, Holyrood, her home,and her constituency until the penny drops. Change won’t come without action”
and if bojo and the eu/un ignore you and breeks and craig murray and robert peffers.
what are you going to do to make indy happen? what can any of us do?
CD, thats what
@ros
her actions?
covid for the mo
then holyrood election. before or after brexit.
that is all she can do. her power comes from the people in a vote. i believe they will now give her a mandate.
this entire article is about what happens when we are refused. which is what both stu and craig believe will happen
if you think you have an answer or have options that nicola hasnt, then do tell, if any good, i’ll vote for you
hint
did you read my comment about standing candidates in the south region? since all the other new indy list parties have said they wont stand there, we have an open door to challenge and beat galloway. hell, I’ll even pay yer deposit
🙂
@Polly
I’ve seen him arguing that HE got Kevin Stewart elected so no one can question him. The same argument Duncan Hothersall used when he was a Labour activist in Edinburgh and his party used to win.
That group of SNP activists he is pals with who sneer on Twitter at anyone who shows a bit of righteous anger at opportunities squandered or who doesn’t agree with every bit of SNP policy do more harm than they can imagine.
That is the trouble with seeking attention – it often comes at you in the ways you don’t want.
@ros
it isnt about being right or wrong, its about our actual options,
its about looking into the near future and reviewing the now limited probable senarios
Wallace And Bruce never asked for permission to seek freedom nor did Michael Collins and they won The SNP policy seems to be if you don’t fight you never lose
@BP
the snp policy is to win a clear mandate from the sovereign people of scotland
something we have never had before.
if and when we do and we are refused by wm/un/eu,
you will get your chance to fight.
leafleting and arguing on wos will lose its allure. i promise you that
If anyone has any doubt whether Dani Garavelli approached her Alphabet women propaganda piece with a neutral view, have a watch. She believed Alex Salmond shouldn’t even have been allowed to raise money for his defence.
link to twitter.com
@schrodingers cat says:
“14 August, 2020 at 5:30 pm
“craigs proposal
which is fine, but it assumes other countries, eg the eu and the un will agree?”
I’ve read it. But I am a little surprised that he and others in favour of such an action have failed to consider the reaction of a certain important group of people – the public.
The proposal sounds like a group of noblemen and local chieftains deciding how they are going change things, without recourse to the very people they represent. Perhaps they could ask them.
SC,
You said,
“ if you think you have an answer or have options that nicola hasnt, then do tell, if any good, i’ll vote for you”.
Nicola has plenty of options, I believe some people are angry she has picked a rubbish one.
@beaker
i wouldnt dismiss craigs plan,
like you i believe we would need a mandate from the sovereign people of scotland before such actions.
I believe we may be very near to achieving this.
(57% support for snp ???)
If we do win this and we are refused.. then nothing can be considered off the table
but for the moment, until we win a 50%+ majority, everything remains hypothetical. until then we continue to increase support for indy.
the democratic road runs out at that point. we cross that bridge when we get to it, not before.
you win wars by fighting the battles in front of you, not the ones you want to fight.
if we win this election, bojo may very well close holyrood and arrest nicola, spain did it and no one even said boo.
so you may get a new leader sooner rather than later.
We did not have sufficient support for independence in the period you referred to. So had we gained a referendum in that period we and independence would be screwed.
Covid19. isn’t something that can be dismissed. It’s crucial that the population of Scotland can have confidence in our government and as a direct result we have increased our majority.
We all want independence so let’s just stay united in the fight for indy.
@breast plate
i repeat, nicola’s options, a holyrood election. before or after brexit. and hope for a 50%+ result from the people
what other option would you propose?
George S Gordon says:
14 August, 2020 at 1:58 pm
“Meanwhile (don’t laugh, you may do yourself a mischief) –
“How George Galloway and I plan to save the Union” ”
I take it that’s the same Jamie Blackett who has an estate at Arbigland in Kirkcudbrighshire and who is deputy Lieutenant of Dumfriesshire?
That Dani Garavelli link is disgraceful and STV
should never have broadcast it.
My Salmond, like everyone, is innocent unless deemed otherwise
By a jury of his piers, Not some jumped up hysterical fantasist.
He received money from me and that was my free choice, a choose this
Woman thinks I’m not entitled to.
As said earlier, people who fund raise need to reveal who they are.
As a jury made up of women decided, you would have been given money
To liars involved in a stitch up.
This pathetic soul masquerading as a journalist is only in print as she a total
Unionist and happy to script write propaganda against Scottish independence.
@bipod, 4.30
As the German Parliament won’t examine/question the disproportionate response to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Germany, these doctors want to hold an extra-parliamentary enquiry. link to youtube.com
‘And nobody else is coming to help.’
Why should they? We’ve done nothing to help ourselves. At independence we don’t need help from international organisations and States. We need recognition.
SC.
As Craig rightly puts it.
“I am sorry, but this is the fact: If you believe Scotland should only move to Independence in a Westminster-approved process, you do not really believe in Scottish Independence at all.”
“Scotland can become independent, but becoming independent is, without doubt, going to be illegal in terms of UK law – which is to say Westminster law. There will not be a route to Independence agreed with Westminster.”
“What Sturgeon said amounts to an explicit acknowledgement of UK sovereignty over the Scottish people as both legitimate and immutable. She is accepting that the Act of Union did permanently alienate the right of self-determination. Sturgeon should heed the tale of Toom Tabard as to what respect English rulers show to Scottish leaders who accept their authority. Her speech reinforced my view that she really is much too comfortable in her role of colonial governor.”
Westminster only has power over us as long as we believe they have it. You want to sit back and wait, tell me SC how long are you prepared to wait for Sturgeon to take action? A year? Two years? Ten years? Or do you even know how long?
Craig Murray is correct if we want independence we’ll need to take it, it certainly won’t be given.
I’ve genuinely wondered at what might be the cause of the party’s bizarre choice of policies and strategy, and thought the NEC must have a cunning plan informed with up-to-date intel and a particle appreciation of the law. Talk about wishful thinking.
Scotland is going nowhere other than where English Torydum demands, unless we can find leadership who respects and knows how to support the international legal order and constitutional democracy.
link to eu2019.fi
@republicofscotland,
keeping her party in power is Sturgeon’s main goal everything else comes second apart from independence, it only gets mentioned to rally the troops when an election is due. Expect to hear far more from her and her clique on independence between now and next May, after that it will once again fall off the radar.
So true, unfortunately.
Regarding the killing of wild animals and protected birds, the SNP went some way with introducing vicarious liability. I followed a case on Raptor Persecution where an attempt was made to use this law. It fell through because the real owner could not be identified behind the myriad shell companies and off-shore trusts. A simple remedy suggested btl was “a human being with a full postal address in Scotland, the UK or EU is required to register their beneficial ownership of any house or land within Scotland upon pain of paying an escalating number of civil penalties for each quarter that the requested and required information is not submitted.” I am not aware of any attempt by the Scottish Government to make the law of vicarious liability enforceable
@RM
recognition is help
but you’re right, if the people of scotland dont support this final push to win 50%+
then no help or recognition will be forth coming from anyone
thats why i find it amazing folk on here saying they wont vote snp even in the constituency. many are trolls, fare enough, but not all. delusion is strong amongst them
Isabel Cooney,
Democracy is an enactment of the majority Will of the People by our representatives.
I understand that there are varying types of democracy but that is the essence.
A referendum is an accurate measurement of the Will of the People.
Surely it’s the SNP’s job as our representatives, to enact the Will of the People whether they agree with that Will or not.
Whether you believe Westminster or the SNP are responsible for Scotland’s referendums.
Withholding the means for that measurement is undemocratic.
WOW SC fair ramping up the NS SNP vote rhetoric and PPB all well and good but here’s a wee idea that I posted earlier SC how’s about you tell queen Nicola to fuck off with her GRA and HCB and focus on indy that will allow us to vote SNP
@shrodingers cat
‘recognition is help’
Recognition is an acceptance that a nation meets the definition of statehood.
@ros
There will not be a route to Independence agreed with Westminster.”
craig is probably correct about this, maybe bojo might give in, who knows, i’m not clairvoyant.
but if you read what i posted, i am not against craigs idea. i merely point out we have an imminent chance to win a democratic mandate from the sovereign people of scotland, 50%+
we need that for what comes next, regardless of what that is, craigs option or whatever.
this has nothing to do with any system either wm or holyrood. it is written nowhere.
its common sense.
without it, with 38% of the vote, craig can start down this road if he wishes but when the britnat establishment comes for him, and they will, i will not be there to help him. nor will anyone else.
how long will i wait?
i am trying to convince people that bringing forward the he to dec 7th to wrong foot bojo.(brexit gives him all the excuse he needs to cancel the he)
if i fail then we will know on 7th may next year, if it goes ahead
@ros
Craig Murray is correct if we want independence we’ll need to take it, it certainly won’t be given.
———–
probably, but we need a 50%+ democratic mandate 1st if we wish to succeed
regardless of how that happens
@RM
Recognition is an acceptance that a nation meets the definition of statehood.
aye, it would be very helpful too 🙂
‘our politicians and reps also have to be squeeky clean give bojo an excuse and he will take it.
we on the other hand are not politicians. i represent no one but my self’
Quit with the ‘we have to do the dirty work’ will you. No we don’t and if we do we’ll be helping initiate our own downfall. Our politicians are squeaky clean and that is exactly why it has to be they who take the lead in this. If they call for mass demonstrations that’s different, then we’re obeying them. If we do anything like that on our own we’ll be called a mob, infiltrated, be accused of riot – or you will when you do it and your beloved Sturgeon will the first take aim at you with rebuke and disown you from her independence movement.
Also do you know the history of Ireland just before 1801? They were given legislative independence with the constitution enacted in 1782. They had almost 20 years where they ran their own affairs, increasing in confidence and becoming more radical until they started to want full independence ( that’s quite a theme and similar timescale happened more than once ). They were getting somewhere good then whiteboy riots made leaders uneasy, then rebellion in Ireland in 1798 failed because of informants, the leaders caught and Westminster brought up two acts to be passed in both parliaments for a new union, Ireland’s parliament refused to endorse it in 1799 but by the same bribery/threat they used for us in 1707, the second time it was passed.
For a brief period that parliament of Grattan made the conception of an independent nation seem possible but Pitt deliberately allowed or maybe even fomented a situation where corruption and frustration ensued. Then riot, crackdown, bribery and force obliterated it. The fact is it was snuffed out just as our parliament might soon be with this new act of union push from Westminster. They succeeded with Ireland for just over a hundred years after and look at the damage they did in that time. Everyone should read about the policies of that brief parliament in Ireland for they still work the same way today and certain things are repeating.
Well Stu, yet again, 100% accurate analysis!
What I despise about Sturgeon, apart from backstabbing Alex, is the way she has utterly trashed Scotlands sovsringty!
We, Scotland, that proud ancient nation, who for hundreds of years were independent, and fiercely fought for that independence, have been sold down the river by the SNP!
As An independent nation, Scotland ( however treacherously) entered u union, from which we as a soverign people can withdraw if the people so choose this!
We Do Not need Westminster’s permission to leave the Union!
What we need is a Scottish Government and SNP Furst misister to assert at every opportunity, Scotlands Soverign right as a nation!
Asking for a section 30 only adopts the subservient, weak, pathetic position of the colonial scot. A position former unio its first ministers were only too happy to personify!
How ironic that our SNP first minister is happy to continue that role.
Nicola sturgeon is in the truly unique situation of being able to give the tory unionist government, and entire british establishment such a myocardial infarction it would be on life support within a week!
The odds are on her side! However, that would take courage and defiance against her brit secret service handlers to whom she is indebted for her current position!
The sturgeon trolls here, possibly the wishart, woke and alphabet crowd, will of course challenge this, let them, they are without credit
They cannot deny your analysis stu which exposes the biggest threat to our freedom. Not from the unionists but from the enemy within. The SNP!
Remove sturgeon and her inner circle and we have a clear chance at regaining our freedom!
Keep exposing the collaborators.
@tx for the irish history lesson polly 🙂
Quit with the ‘we have to do the dirty work’ will you. No we don’t and if we do we’ll be helping initiate our own downfall.
———————
as craig murray points out, any attempt to leave the uk, even by democratic means will be blocked by wm, ergo it will become illegal.
high profile politicians can propose the people break the law by doing x y and z, but they will get arrested. see bbc tv licence etc. they can do it but they will simply get arrested.
i merely point out that politicians are for democracy. if we get 50%+ in next holyrood election and bojo says no, democracy is removed
who needs politicians… meh?
@ Cat
Aye, you might know it, not everyone does. But they’re still to be preferred than you if you know it and still insist ordinary folk have to lead the way in situations like that which will lead nowhere good.
re. the “rule of recognition” and the international legal order. Though legal theory is inadequate to resisting the cultural interpretations of the law that are regularly applied in open court, here’s some legal theory anyway. I think it at least helpful to know where one stands in relation to theory. How else can one judge the reasonableness of one’s practice?
link to journals.openedition.org
@polly
oh, not only have i read about it polly, I have seen it 1st hand when democracy was removed. not pretty.
why do you think i’m trying to convince folk that we need a 50%+ result in holyrood?
for any actions, eg legal challenges, appeals to the un etc, you need the support from the majority of the people.
without it, a country quickly descends into civil war.
@schrodingers cat 7:07pm
Recognition is essential.
Try and stop heckling. It just blocks interesting threads.
The threat has to be a simple one: grant an indyref, or the next available election we stand on a platform of UDI.
Everybody who’s anybody on Twitter is now either seeing the logic in Stu’s argument, or they’re in such deep denial, or suffering similar profound hubris, that they’re unable to join the majority of tweeters who ARE seeing what’s going on.
Splitters? don’t even go there when it’s abundantly clear who’s causing the friction and division in this movement. It’s not the ordinary public who’re calling for the most ridiculous, anti-women laws in the country, it’s not the man/woman in the street who’re falsely and disgustingly persecuting a former First Minister and those who support him. Nor is it only the general public who are deeply troubled by plans to create a bill to prevent ‘thought crime’ – most major institutions and professional bodies in Scotland are aligned with us. It’s not ordinary Scots attacking and blocking tweeters for questioning the role many MPs are undertaking – or not – in Westminster, it’s those lazy, settled-in MPs who’re doing the blocking. How dare we question their superior judgement?
For all those tweeters in such deep denial; we’ll wait for you to come round, it might take some time, sure, but we’ll still be here, waiting for that lovely Tory-permission for a second referendum.
it seems Scotland’s got all the time in the world when it comes to self-determination. No hurry.
@ Cat
God knows what you’re trying to convince anyone of since all here want 50+ anyway and always have hoped for it. Keeping repeating it to folk already agreeing doesn’t further your cause. And a UN appeal or legal challenge will not lead to civil war but protests on the street where infiltrators could cause trouble to be blamed on us will lead to denunciation and a crack down which could spiral and that will definitely be a possible civil strife scenario. That’s why I say whiter than white politicians are the ones to be doing something not ordinary people.
@ john rose
‘The threat has to be a simple one: grant an indyref, or the next available election we stand on a platform of UDI.’
Yes I agree with this. I only wish they would take some action.
I see someone mentioned this in a post above – Henry VIII powers.
Can someone please explain to me how Henry VII powers, which only applied to the English Parliament, can be applied to the Parliament of the UK – given the Parliament of England was shut-down by the Act of Union of 1707 – 160 years after Henry’s death.
Polly says:
all here want 50+ anyway and always have hoped for it.
——–
half the folk on here say they wont vote snp ever again.
but im glad you support the idea
@ cat
If as you say Sturgeon is playing a blinder and the polls are so fantastic – and also that Wings has gone to the dogs and leaching readers as you’ve claimed – then why are you worried about what the few left here think? As I said once before you’re all over the place. Pick one logical position and follow it through and your arguments won’t need to keep being reiterated as you do now. Have a good night, I plan to.
This ain’t rocket science for me – pull all SNP MPs out of Westminster now, never to return.
Simple.
The English will do the rest. They’ve had enough of democracy deniers.
Return a 50/50 in Holyrood next May and our friends to the South will back us to the hilt.
Boris’ hand will be forced.
Who dares wins.
Has DD accepted the bet yet?
Mind you, he doesn’t read WOS any more, does he? – could someone please let him know?
😉
Socrates MacSporran
“Can someone please explain to me how Henry VII powers, which only applied to the English Parliament, can be applied to the Parliament of the UK – given the Parliament of England was shut-down by the Act of Union of 1707 – 160 years after Henry’s death.”
It only works if you apply the same liberal interpretivism to legal theory and practice, that would enable men to claim to be women in the true sense of legal “being”. This is the sort of politics that considers itself above the law, and is supportive of cultural narcissism, misogyny and totalitarian authoritarianism (see Brexit).
Socrates, I think that was John Walsh’s point further up. Utilization thereof is offensive to Scotland’s sovereignty and should (in theory) result in a metaphorical placement of a foot upon Ms Sturgeon’s posterior.
@Socrates Mc Sporran,
Henry 8 power is a bit of a misnomer. They refer to the power of the Executive to legislate in times of crisis of emergency without consulting parliament. Just like Trumps Executive orders in America.
In the UK they have been used before and even after the Treaty of Union.
It was remember Boris who tried to prorogue parliament using Executive powers. Ms Cherry proved it was a non starter because of Scottish rights.
My legal theory is very, very, rusty, but I do know that you get yourself into all sorts of bother is you start playing fast and loose with the “Rule of Recognition”.
link to repository.law.umich.edu
@shrodingers Cat
“half the folk on here say they wont vote snp ever again.”
And whose fault is that?
With GRA, the HCB, stalling on Indyref2, and acting as if it were the Scottish Mandate Party rather than the SNP it’s no wonder people are reluctant to vote for the SNP.
How can we be expected to vote for a party which has prominent members who have appalling views on women? FFS their Woman’s Convener won’t sign a pledge to back Woman’s rights because it excludes men from Women’s safe places.
sorry….if you start….
link to academia.edu
Breeks has previously made very good points on legal issues which should affect Scotland. The problem is that many of our rights have been eroded by Unionist politicians representing Scotland and failing to challenge those pieces of legislation which affected our rights. Ie The Supreme Court.
The public knowing no better accepted these things as a fait accomplie. Their loyalty was to a political party rather than a country.
Me Cherry proved twice, beyond any doubt, we still have rights in Scotland. We just need someone to enforce them better.
Once Brexit is complete the Tories have a secret plot to oust Aldi and Lidl from the UK.
(that’s as good a rumour as any to start)
.
Hi Polly,
You are right about Cat.
Now I just scroll by that weird ident he/she/it has: the one of a cat’s facial reaction after sitting on a cactus.
When he/she/it resurfaced here, and I read a few of that Mastur Baiter’s trolling efforts, the syntax, grammar, textual idioms were all over the place. As if there were at least three cats behind that ID. Polly you are spot-on about Cat being all over the place. I believe it is because there are multiple people working in shift rotation from that ID that you have noticed the multiple personality traits emanating from the obsessive compulsive need for it to leave Cat turd comments all over this website.
Then there is the bizarre pollution of 30% of a thread with posts from this one account.
Conclusion? He/she/it is a 77th Bridage or an SNP/HQ/McWoke SPAD trolling professionally.
How on earth can one person spend 14 hours a day posting 120 comments on a single thread?
Logic states that Cat is a multi-user account with some form of disruptive agenda.
Either that, or the Cat is an incredibly sad and lonely person, likely surrounded by 39 stray cats. He/she/it typing alone from their bedroom in order to waste the time and lives of others.
—————————————————-
Polly says:
14 August, 2020 at 7:47 pm
@ cat
If as you say Sturgeon is playing a blinder and the polls are so fantastic – and also that Wings has gone to the dogs and leaching readers as you’ve claimed – then why are you worried about what the few left here think? As I said once before you’re all over the place. Pick one logical position and follow it through and your arguments won’t need to keep being reiterated as you do now. Have a good night, I plan to.
Couldn’t agree more that under the current leadership independence is going nowhere.
Another few months and we’re totally out of Europe and a few months after that the Scottish Parliament will have it’s powers reduced to that of a Parish Council.
Indeed, in relation to what is about to befall us, the First Minister has only this week declared that she will serve the next full term as First Minister. Yes that’s right, another five years as leader of a devolved and soon to be decrepit Scottish Parliament. Just give her and the comfortable one more mandate.
Couldn’t agree more with your analysis Rev Stu. And neither do tens of thousands of dissatisfied SNP members and the wider electorate.
.
Grouse Beater,
Sorry to hear you are unwell.
That article you posted is a very elegant way to say thankyou you our Scottish National Health Service.
Get well soon Grousy.
george wood says:
@shrodingers Cat
“half the folk on here say they wont vote snp ever again.”
And whose fault is that?
————-
take that up with polly, it was here who said everyone here will vote snp
RE: the court case to determine is a s.30 is required before Holyrood can legislate for a referendum on independence:
Holyrood can legislate for any and as many referendums as it likes. BUT, they cannot legislate on reserved matters, and the constitution is a reserved matter. So, can the two be combined so that Holyrood can legislate (to make it ‘legal’) for a referendum that would change the constitution (independence)?
That isn’t certain, and isn’t known – hence the court case. There are arguments either way (because of woolly wording on the Scotland Act).
Whatever the outcome of the case, it will be useful – we should already know this stuff, it’s been in limbo for too long as it is – you need to know this to be able to have any kind of strategy (ref:Plan B). So to plan the strategy – if it’s a ‘no they canny’ then we look to one of Craig Murray’s options (international law legal route) backed by a majority signed covenant (lots of hard work, but worth it) – if it’s a ‘aye they can’ ,,, well, what is the SNP waiting for?
Now the case is going ahead, the Scottish Government has asked to drop out and remain ‘neutral’ – a very strange move, but may have a reasonable explanation behind it.
O/T
I caught the Kaiser report on RT yesterday and there was an bit on an author discussing a book he wrote on the tech industry in the US. The obvious point he made was that the big US tech companies were selling services at no cost so they make money on advertising and nudge behavioural algorithms that pushed you towards these advertisers. Also mentioned was that the real war between the US and China is about AI whereby in China, they are leading because vast amounts of information can be collected whereas in the West numerous data protection laws stops the Us tech corporations from competing in the AI race with China in a level playing field.
This got me thinking. There was a recent news report about Ben & Jerry’s posting a tweet about the UK government stopping migrants from coming across the English channel. Most likely that company tweet wasn’t created by somebody in the company but outsourced by an advertising company who used an algorithm to generate a tweet that would trend highly in most persons results when they log into the application. Given the latest topic is BLM and racism in general, it is hardly surprising that such a tweet made by B&H would be popular. It isn’t hard to do, here is a link here:
link to blog.hootsuite.com
It might sound a good idea to bash the Tories but what happens when the trend conflates BLM and racism towards nationalism? There are different forms of nationalism and Scottish nationalism is more political orientated rather than towards skin colour or place or birth. It is so easy to game Twitter and other social media systems to place Scottish nationalism in a negative light.
The question is how do we deal with it?
Of course Scots have rights, it’s just that British constitutionalism does its best to ignore this fact of law. We simply appear to lack leadership that recognises a legally defensible identity, is the source of one’s ability to claim access to legal rights.
Westminster articulates English legal culture and, subsequently, consider itself impervious to international law. So there’s nothing really to limit a legal culture that considers itself superior, and Scots legally inferior.
THE POLITICS
OF THE
COMMON LAW
Second Edition
PERSPECTIVES, RIGHTS, PROCESSES, INSTITUTIONS
link to docshare01.docshare.tips
Am I the only one who finds it sadly ironic that Doug Daniel was the leader of the Aberdeen contingent of the Wings ‘team’ during 2014? How people change when they drink the SNP Cool Aid. (Not the first time I’ve seen that happen.)
Stick to English politics you clearly hate the SNP the only party that can deliver Independence and if you are so sure they can’t then offer an alternative instead of constantly bitching. Surely what happens in Bath should be of more concern after all you do live there!
Paul says: 14 August, 2020 at 9:28 pm
Are you so prejudiced that you don’t accept opinions outside of Scotland?
Getting back to the “Rule of Recognition”. Please feel free to fill your boots.
link to academic.oup.com
Stu, have you ever had your IQ tested,
the way you can take facts and figures and make a fairly accurate future prediction from them smacks of a very high IQ,
IQ Classification
130–144 Gifted or very advanced
120–129 Superior
110–119 High average
90–109 Average
45-89 Scottish Labour voter
25-44 Scottish Labour politician
04-24 Kezzy Dugdale
00-03 All Torys
@paul,
Thanks for that insight. It was_____insightful.
@Pac Man,
I imagine Paul would have said the same to Prince Charlie in France.!!
You can come up with all the scenarios you want, you can join the ‘I Hate Rachel Green Club’. the simple fact if the SNP can’t achieve over 50% of the vote at the next election then you can wave goodbye to any chance of independence.
Westminster will dismiss any other parties:
Greens – really a environmental party loosely aligned to independence.
ISP – anti GRA party, disaffected SNP members breaking away about woman’s rights above independence.
Name any party and I can produce a reason why they are not independence parties as their primary aim, it’s easy. And there is not going to be a viable alternative independence party before next May, unless AS is playing a deception blinder.
You can believe any split in the independence vote won’t be jumped on by the Britnat establishment, I’m not so confident about that.
Bob Mack says:
14 August, 2020 at 9:38 pm
He’d have a haemorrhage about all those tourists who came here and said Scotland is a fine country and can’t understand why the Scots would want to control their own affairs.
That`s it in a nutshell rev.
I really am left scratching my head at the majority of posters in the National who think independence is in the bag if we would all just be patient and back NS who is doing the job of a world class leader and people who criticise her are nasty trolls.
Are they just thick or belong to a fireside knitting circle and have absolutely no idea what is going on out there. To see them get giddy and come over all unnecessary at the news that we are on a supposed high of 53% when the last two polls had us on 54% is frightening.
I despair.
@revstu Nice post and I fully agree with the analysis and generally agree with your line of thinking that if a legal challenge is undertaken (no matter the outcome) it would likely speed up the prospect of a Referendum to occur. Whether such efforts, if undertaken now, would have favourable support of the general public is possibly debatable.
I just had a separate thought though. I wonder if there will ever be a point in time where it’s so clear that Scotland wants to be Independent that the moderate English conservative leaning voter is no longer comfortable with their government (con or lab) denying the Scots a say. At the moment it’s not actually too hard for me to imagine. I think the English would be uncomfortable with this at some point and I don’t think the majority of them like being seen as unfair and undemocratic oppressors. There’s a certain pride or superiority complex that they have that seems to reach from the general populace to the highest levels of government. For them to be seen on the world stage denying a democratic say to Scotland who lets say for argument has over 60% indy in polls and/or seats in Holyrood would cause some level of embarrassment I think. Especially after all the lecturing the government is doing to China in regards to democracy for Hong Kong. I also don’t think moderate English conservatives voters or MP’s themselves would enjoy a parallel drawn between them and what the Spanish have done. I think they want to think of themselves as democratically superior to those Spaniards.
I think even Brexiteers would become uncomfortable with a hard line at some point, the argument “Imagine Brussels said you couldn’t have a referendum” seems pretty effective even though the idea would’ve been practically unrealistic. I don’t think they’d like to be seen as worse than Brussels.
The idea that this hard line taken by the Tories will always wash, in the face of a clearly measurable majority for Independence does seem at least a little unlikely to me. Although I have to admit this is the first time I’ve considered this and most of the time I’m usually just bored, pissed off and impatient as everyone else.
Hello Stuart- I am sure you have been asked this before, but why don’t you just ask Nicola Sturgeon the questions you pose on your website? Why not ask her rather than making assumptions about her aims and her motives? It would be a very interesting exchange I am sure and could be conducted like the one with Alec Salmond. I am not that much of a fan of Nicola Sturgeon myself, but I have always felt that she answers questions honestly. So, rather than doing big £1000 challenge gestures to some guy Doug Daniel, why not ask Sturgeon for an interview? Maybe you have asked for one and been refused (and you could let us know about that), but if you don’t ask you don’t get. I, like you, aren’t that keen on many SNP policies, I don’t like the way the NEC works either but being publicly critical of the party without actually asking them about the things that interest you is a bit lame.
Yesterday you again raised the issue about wasted votes and a list party – something you have been doing for a very long time. Why don’t you just do it? Why do you keep harping on about the sense behind it and Gavin’s analysis? Why can’t you just do it? I am sure many on this website are waiting for this announcement. By launching now we could all get an idea of how the Wings brand is favoured in the polls. If it is reasonable then those interested in it could get behind it and perhaps attract others. If it is a lame duck then we could put the idea to bed and get behind the overarching aim of independence rather than waste time arguing over the philosophical, political and policy differences that can be discussed and voted on after independence.
Very clever win-win there Stu.
You either get £1,000 or we get an indy referendum.
Can’t see the downside to be fair :0)
Personally, I think the independence movement needs to reset and restart. Trying to apply a quick fix might kill it off for decades. The SNP needs new leadership but more than that it needs discipline. It’s not there, and it stems from the arrogance of having huge majorities.
The untouchables.
Look at John Mason for example. How many times has he upset the public with his comments? In one incident it required the intervention of Sturgeon to force him to apologise. Mhairi Black is the same, having a go at her constituents yet has never apologised, leaving poor John Swinney to deal with the fallout.
Then there are the councillors in Glasgow and Edinburgh. Christ knows what they are up to. Alyn Smith’s leaked email should have resulted in an instant dismissal from the party. The NEC seems to be a law unto itself, trying to parachute Robertson into a seat he has little if any connections with, all in the name of blocking a perceived threat in Joanna Cherry.
A list party might be the best way, although with so many floating around only one is needed. Winning a few seats might just be the catalyst to sort out the SNP.
But ffs do not even think about going down the route of “civil disobedience”. That is the start of a very slippery and dangerous slope.
In other words we’re screwed, I know I’ll never see Independence under this current administration therefore if the party isn’t reformed before the election then for me they’re not worth voting for, I’ll live in hope that as well as a new list party there will be a new constituency party otherwise I’ll only be using one vote.
I feel…
that (I hope) the SNP upper echelons have been wargaming over the past six years and have a number of options in reserve.
I think, particularly of the pronouncements in the HoC that Scotland would not be dragged out of Europe, against her will.
Why make such statements, unless you’re sure of your position – or unless your blustering?
Between now and November, I expect SOMETHING that will have the MSM all over the place, or else, we the Scots, represented by our Holyrood government and our Westminster MPs, will have to accept that we have been betrayed and independence is off the table for the forseeable future.
Beaker,
The SNP has real discipline and that discipline, self discipline is in the members.
In any other party the discontent within the rank and file would have ripped the party apart. But those of us who are true SNP will do everything in their power to keep the party together in the shared experience of pursuing the goal of independence. That is the difference between us and other parties. We have common cause that we believe in.
The current party leadership have however played on that loyalty, and we are now at the stage where if the leadership do not bend and change track then we will be bend them , out of existence.
Independence is our core, it is what we believe, it is what we live for. We do not live for another five years of devolution and a Tory Government. Sturgeon plays a dangerous game with her disinterest in independence. We will get rid of her before we get rid of the party.
There are enough now within the ranks who feel strongly enough to do this. They have made their voice heard and then some. They will do everything to get the party back on track and away from the jobsworths who see the SNP as a way to making a living. Time therefore that Nicola changed tack or retired with grace. Mrs Murrell and her coterie will not win.
@Helen Yates (10.03) and BDTT (10.27) –
It’s very unlike either of you to sound gloomy so just stop it! If you don’t I’ll come round there and do Shakin’ Stevens impersonations right outside yer hooses!
It’s only *checks diary* August. That means there’s *checks diary again* pure months and months till the SG election. The wokies and their mysterious false-tash-twirling backers are already bricking it because there’s no way they could’ve anticipated the general knowledge of what they’re up to spreading so quickly. But it has.
It’s hard to be exact cause the whole covid thing plays such tricks with memory of recent events but I’d hazard a guess that, say, a year ago, most SNP members and Yes/indy activists hadn’t a clue what the whole TRA/GRA stushie was about. Well, a lot of them do now, eh? And who’s to thank for raising it as an issue many months before it was on anyone else’s radar? (I wont name him – it’ll just give him a big heid.)
That whole NEC debacle just helped get more light on it all, and that’s what these characters hate – it seems plain now that they were trying to abuse procedure in order to clear the way for their preferred candidates to stand. But they’ve been rumbled. They *knew* that what Stu has been saying re list voting was correct but they pooh-poohed it in the hope that most SNP branch members would just stick with the SNP 1&2 mantra, thus allowing their weird pals a better chance. And now it’s backfired big-time – not only has their plan been exposed, but its drawn attention to them and that’s what they really fear. (Why else would Alyn Smith be taking his eyebrows for a Michael Jackson moonwalk back out the fuckin door just t’other day?)
And there’s still another *checks diary* nine full months before the election? Can you even begin to imagine how much more is going to come out about these bellends in that time? And what the SNP branch members will have to say about it all?
So verily I say unto thee – let us be of good heart friends, and drink long into the night!
Hoots all!
😉 🙂 😉 🙂 😉
OT
If you want a break from the serious stuff
Check out #ScottishScienceFiction
Invasion Of The Boaby Snatchers, anybody.
@ BDTT: I’d like to share your cautious optimism that there is a cunning secret plan but whenever I have emailed or spoken to my senior SNP MP I have never received anything to encourage that optimism. It has always been – we need 60% in the polls – and the constitution is reserved – i.e. no hint of any organisation in preparation for e.g. the calling of the Convention as suggested by Craig Murray.
I suggested years ago that the SNP should work with key elements of the Yes movement such as the Rev, Craig Murray, Paul Kavanagh, but got no response. I have also pointed out the urgent necessity of action given the type of people in UK government in recent years. But have never had a response that matched my thinking.
The trouble is that we and the wider public have grown to assume that it is up to the SNP to pursue independence and we can do nothing except wait to be asked for a vote. But is that the way it worked e.g. in the French Revolution – or was it the masses who pushed the agenda on the parliament?
It should be us holding a Convention and presenting a covenant [or whatever] to Holyrood that demands our sovereignty be implemented. Holyrood should be acting as a sovereign body by our rules, not accept the limitations imposed by Westminster.
The Smith Commission recognised our right so that should be sufficient to ensure the Scottish Government can act as our national independent government. It makes my blood run cold to hear Nicola Sturgeon say she will do nothing until the economic effects of Covid are over.
People nod sagely in agreement when it is said the government is required to govern for everyone, not for their supporters. So the Scottish govt says it must not talk about, nor take steps, for independence because that is party political.
Well that is not the case. If it were the case then every government would be saying that certain subjects could not be affected by their policies – they would be neutral or require cross-party support e.g. education, welfare. But this doesn’t happen – a party gains a majority and it is that party’s policy that determines what happens.
So the current Scottish government is perfectly entitled to talk about, and prepare for independence, no matter that there is a public health issue going on. We need to make the government listen to us and do what we say, if we can show a large enough number of supporters.
We already have the SIC and several other groups. Are they large enough together to be the Yes movement’s voice?
WT @ 9.53pm:
Good suggestion about The Rev asking Nicola Sturgeon for an interview.
But, don’t hold your breath waiting. There is simply no way Nicola would ever allow herslef to be exposed to the Rev’s forensic line of questioning.
She will quite happily deal with the Unionist media, but, will never allow the Rev or Wings to be considered worthy of her attention.
Wouldn’t it be interesting if Rev Stu asked Nicola for an interview and she declined?
A whole new page opening up…
With an election coming up next year, there are a lot of candidates to question and scrutinise before they are adopted.
Do you support the GRA and Hate Crime Bill legislation ?
Please answer yes or no.
If they do not answer NO on both counts please bin these candidates along with Angus Robertson and Alyn Smith. Fake Independence supporters !!
If the Scottish government is serious about its response to covid-19, then it needs to take account of global health law, IMHO. Allowing Scotland to be removed from the EU’s legal jurisdiction, will seriously impair our ability to access our rights to health and a healthy environment. That’s part of the Tory desire to ‘re-gain control’ from a ‘restrictive’ EU.
@ Cat
‘take that up with polly, it was here who said everyone here will vote snp’
I said nothing of the sort. I said “since all here want 50+ anyway and always have hoped for it”.
Even the folk who are so scunnered by your high priestess of inaction on independence and bad action on other things, even those that feel they can no longer vote for her party would still love there to be a huge majority for independence. As other folk have said who could blame them if they didn’t vote for the present party. I will vote for it but do so in spite of them, in fact I’ll do it almost to spite them because I think they don’t want independence. I will not be voting for them because of them or anything they have done.
Why don’t you learn to argue better then you won’t be so annoying.
@ Hugh Wallace
‘How people change when they drink the SNP Cool Aid.’
Isn’t it more a bad trait of human nature generally? Looking out for number one especially if it can lead to preferment, advancement or acclaim? They’re the same kind of people that Mr Pickwick described when he spoke of situations where if there’s a mob shouting then shout along, if there’s two competing mobs then shout with the loudest. Fair weather friends.
Now here is someone who BELIEVES IN THE CAUSE OF INDEPENDENCE and is willing to do something about it
link to twitter.com
@polly
i was having a good evening, tx
I agree with a lot of this but disagree on two substantive points. Firstly, there is no such thing as “wildcat” referendum. There is nothing in any part of the Scotland Act or indeed the principle of Devolution that “that which isn’t retained is devolved” that stops the Scottish Government from holding a perfectly valid and legal referendum on independence. There is only the argument that it would not be legally BINDING on the UK government to accept the result of such a vote. Indeed, there is nothing in the Edinburgh Agreement, the previously accepted legal framework for a referendum that requires the UK to offer a fair and equitable deal with Scotland on what independence means or what structures would be put in place following a Yes vote. In short, they agreed to “respect” such a vote, not to capitulate to every point within the White Paper. This is evidenced with their stated refusal to countenance a currency union post independence. The only restriction is that the Scottish Government could not unilaterally alter the constitution of the United Kingdom in the event of a Yes vote following a referendum. There are many arguments around the international furore that would or could occur if they refused to recognise such a vote, not least in terms of their commitments under the UN charter, but they could just as easily say they recognised the vote and offer such a ridiculously one sided “deal” that the Scottish Government would be bound to refuse it and be left in the position of a No Deal scenario just like the “advisory” EU referendum. They would, however, no longer be able to deploy the argument that there was no appetite for independence.
The second point of contention is that Unionist councils would somehow refuse to engage with and enact such a vote if mandated by Holyrood, their Parliament, to do so. There would be no legal grounds on which they could refuse to hold the vote and this will no doubt be proven by the People’s S30 case currently going through the courts.
The Scottish Government could and should hold an advisory referendum on independence at the earliest opportunity and give the Scottish Parliament the right to negotiate independence with the UK government. Where we go from there is far less certain, but no less so that being granted a section 30 only for the result of that vote to be subject to the same wrangling and arguments for years as the Brexit vote was over what KIND of independence we get. Doing nothing is no longer an option.
@willie says:
14 August, 2020 at 10:32 pm
“The SNP has real discipline and that discipline, self discipline is in the members.”
I think I should have been more specific. I’m not having a pop at the rank and file, as the discipline can be seen on AUOB marches and with the canvassers in the street.
I am talking about certain politicians who should be setting an example, not abusing their position by pursuing and promoting their own narrow agendas.
If the politicians won’t set a good example, then the rot will set in.
Human nature.
Re. Recalcitrant Council compliance on indyref2.
Maybe not an insurmountable barrier.
Give them an out, and watch attitudes shift by every % point we gain, until all see which way the wind is blowing.
THere is a Point of No Return.
😉
The Carrot.
The make up of every Council will remain exactly the same at the given hour for indy, only difference being who they work for!
Elections in due course.
Post transitional MSPs & councillors will obviously need to ditch being someone else’s bitch, and form proper autonomous parties/groupings.
Just imagine, parties would be able to ditch the prefix ‘Scottish’.
No more sniggers, no more fear of phrases such as ‘branch office’,or ‘Leader’!
Post indy, Holyrood will sorely need to be a broad church.
Bring ’em all in, because it’s in all our own intere$£$ after all.
The Stick
If you want to stay, given the trend in %s, show it. Or you’ll suffer the consequences.
I’d think it’s not unfair to assume there would be social, safety & financial fall out for Local representatives seen to be playing silly buggers.
Parachute MSPs can hide, do a Ruth.
Let those who want to stay British demonstrate their passion, not hide behind, and rely upon, a sordid undemocratic fix.
Or else.
’79 in reverse.
Manifesto pledge to dissolve the Union if elected to govern. The people are sovereign.
Sworn in by Queenie herself on the day of victory. Is Westminster going to go against the sovereign and sovereign will of the people?
Probably, but not from a position of legality or strength.
The FM will like this.
link to globalresearch.ca
She will not like this.
link to globalresearch.ca
CBB bot
You wrote “If the Scottish government is serious about its response to covid-19, then it needs to take account of global health law, IMHO. Allowing Scotland to be removed from the EU’s legal jurisdiction, will seriously impair our ability to access our rights to health and a healthy environment. That’s part of the Tory desire to ‘re-gain control’ from a ‘restrictive’ EU.“
I think that is the 17th time you have posted the exact same comment.. and still no one responds!
Off topic, out of time, out of touch and irrelevant .
I disagree with the second part of this article, the bit about how Boris is never going to grant a section 30 so it’s daft to say he might.
I think what the article says is dangerous and counterproductive. If even the Yes movement talk down the relevance and legitimacy of a Holyrood election in making another referendum happen, what hope do we have to persuade others who need to support that mandate that it is, indeed a mandate for exactly that? If we go into May 2021 saying ‘this is basically irrelevant- he’s not going to grant a referendum, it’s not going happen, forget it’, then if a pro-Indy mandate DOES emerge, so what? No one said it was about independence, no one expected there to actually be another ref… we all just muddle on.
If, on the other hand, the SNP and the wider Yes movement say, in the run up to the election, ‘yes, of course this is the democratic mechanism that exists for us to demand an independence referendum. And we fully expect our right as a democratic country to have our democratic choices respected’, then a pro-indy majority post-election situation takes on an entirely different hue.
It would put very clear pressure on BJ to respect that mandate, or to try to explain why he might choose not to do so. And if you fall into Stuart’s camp of thinking that BJ will simply never say yes (which might be the case), it means that any Plan B (which I actually think NS would have to implement in such circumstances) would have infinitely more legitimacy and support from those (eg international community) whose support we would then need.
David Hooks @ 2.28am
I agree that there is no such thing as a wildcat referendum, but your assumption that ‘there is nothing in the Scotland act’ etc is wrong – why bother with the court case if it was that clear cut? It isn’t – Sewell intended for the Scotland Act to ensure a Scottish Government couldn’t legislate on constitutional matters, I.e. Hold an independence referendum (‘legally’) – but in fact, the legislation is badly written and doesn’t necessarily do what was intended – hence it going for judicial review.
I will repeat:
“RE: the court case to determine is a s.30 is required before Holyrood can legislate for a referendum on independence:
Holyrood can legislate for any and as many referendums as it likes. BUT, they cannot legislate on reserved matters, and the constitution is a reserved matter. So, can the two be combined so that Holyrood can legislate (to make it ‘legal’) for a referendum that would change the constitution (independence)?
That isn’t certain, and isn’t known – hence the court case. There are arguments either way (because of woolly wording on the Scotland Act).
Whatever the outcome of the case, it will be useful – we should already know this stuff, it’s been in limbo for too long as it is – you need to know this to be able to have any kind of strategy (ref:Plan B). So to plan the strategy – if it’s a ‘no they canny’ then we look to one of Craig Murray’s options (international law legal route) backed by a majority signed covenant (lots of hard work, but worth it) – if it’s a ‘aye they can’ ,,, well, what is the SNP waiting for?
Now the case is going ahead, the Scottish Government has asked to drop out and remain ‘neutral’ – a very strange move, but may have a reasonable explanation behind it.”
If you read the supporting arguments in the case first brought forward & crowdfunded by forward as one, you get an understanding of why it isn’t clear, and why it needs to be clarified. I don’t think it helps anyone to boldly state something as fact when we just don’t know yet. YET. Do please donate to the crowdfunder, and you may be able to boldly state the facts soon enough.
Sensibledave @ 8.24am
Leave CBB alone, some of like reading his alternative take on things, whether you think it relevant or not, and whether we reply or not.
I’m SICK of this ‘no debate’ culture. Evryone has their own view, let them express it.
Beaker @9.57
Careful what you wish for.
The Salmond farce aside, party stalwarts and vile cybernats hitherto cast aside in response to opposition tittle tattle will have their own perceptions of the party’s rather perverse approach to discipline but when you factor in the advocation of severe punishment for any top flight football players having had the temerity to ease the pain of a significant defeat with a night out or, perhaps outrageously, having spent a night playing away in Europe, the long term damage might end up being so pervasive that the beautiful dream of independence will evolve into the nightmare of men of independent mind needing to apply for an English passport in order to retain any hope of being free in the traditional sense.
What’s dave wittering on about now? He’s an Englishman who rejects John Locke, and who clearly struggles with supporting the concepts of limited government and natural rights. Yet he thinks he’s the man to explain how liberal constitutionalism works, for the benefit of us uneducated northerners. Well, he’s the voice of English Torydum, innit.
EU Human rights, democracy and rule of law:
from concepts to practice
link to fp7-frame.eu
CBB, have you posted much on this:
“In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person’s choice to deny reality as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth. Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of a historical experience or event, when a person refuses to accept an empirically verifiable reality.”
That is from Wiki. (I’ve copied this over from someone else’s post)
Contrary
Thanks for the support, but I wouldn’t call my view of the world an “alternative take on things”. I’ve simply been trained in an approach to the law that isn’t compromised by cultural baggage and, subsequent, legal prejudice. Remember, Scots already suffer from a lack of access to human rights, which Brexit merely entrenches in constitutional law. That’s not how liberal constitutionalism works, and certainly not one that involves the political union of equal nation states. Allegedly.
Democracy and human rights are two sides of the same coin
link to wfd.org
All this talk on gaining over 50% of the vote if we have another Scottish Parliament election means little if there aren’t specifically worded manifestos from the Parties involved so the electorate are properly informed on what they are actually voting for.
Plus, as there are “supposedly” multiple Pro-Indy Parties there would need to be commonality in aspects of their policy, or a memorandum of understanding between them, that should the Constituency and Regional List votes cast for them produce an overall majority then it gives validity to moving forward with a specific action.
With Sovereignty being discussed, Jim Fairlie Jnr produced a trilogy of articles recently which are worth a read.
12th June
link to thenational.scot
3rd July
link to thenational.scot
28th July
link to thenational.scot
Contrary
I’m pretty sure I’ve already posted something similar.
Delusions and Belief Formation: A Cognitive Neuropsychiatric Approach
link to orca.cf.ac.uk
So the new but absent Tory branch manager in Scotland Douglas Ross tweeted happy 73rd anniversary on independence to Pakistan, independence is good for every other country but not ours it seems.
Meanwhile Boris Johnson is to rip down all EU flags on EU funded projects and replace them with the Butchers Apron (Union Jack). On top of this Johnson has given orders that the Butchers Apron needs to be more visible across Scotland and the UK as a whole. Expect a lot more in your face union jackery in the near future.
2020 is just going to go on and on and …..
Dear White Vegans, Stop Appropriating Food
link to archive.is
It is after 9am on Saturday.
I really need a laugh.
Where is Holiday Boy when I need him?
Contrary says:
15 August, 2020 at 8:31 am
…That isn’t certain, and isn’t known – hence the court case. There are arguments either way (because of woolly wording on the Scotland Act).
The Scotland Act did not change one single word in the 1707 Treaty of Union. I remain confused why altering (or clarifying) the terms of the colonial Scotland Act should demand such attention when we have a perfectly serviceable Sovereign Constitution making our people sovereign, and by explicit implication, free to make collective decisions (through referenda or any other means), which nobody has the sovereign authority to overrule. We are sovereign. We are our own arbiters. Why do we prevaricate?
There is a very poignant question which needs an answer, and that is why Scotland’s elected “Government” has forsaken Scotland’s Sovereign Constitution and now grovels before the colonial Scotland Act as if it was the sacred gospel. The Scotland Act is an extension of Westminster’s rule over Scotland; it is a colonial beachhead which endeavours to strengthen the foothold and accepted‘convention’ of UK Parliamentary Sovereignty.
Westminster is playing hardball simply because “they” know they are dealing with a Scottish Government which is inept, confused and constitutionally illiterate when it comes down to the potency and status of Scotland’s constitution. They literally don’t know their own Constitutional strength, so Westminster is exploiting that frailty and stealing their sweeties and lunch money.
If the Scottish “Government” requires an answer to the vexing question of whether a Section 30 Agreement is required to hold a referendum, perhaps they should set aside the Rule book of the colonial Scotland Act which didn’t even exist before 1998, and apply themselves to the sovereign Constitution of the Nation which has existed since 1320, and was neither altered nor diminished by the 1707 Act of Union, as evidenced by the Claim of Right… and indeed by Joanna Cherry’s “subjugation“ of Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue the Westminster Parliament.
If Scotland’s “Government” is absolutely determined to make itself irrelevant and impotent through slavish regard for the colonial Scotland Act, and the corresponding disregard for the Scottish Nation’s Constitution, then it strikes me, Holyrood elections become a farce. We are just electing our ‘preferred’ Gauleiter to liaise with Westminster on our behalf. We should stop calling the Scottish Government the “Government” , and reserve such accolades for a TRUE Scottish Parliament which has as it’s founding principle, respect for the sovereign constitution of the Nation.
Of course, supporting genderwoowoo in law, calls for a particular delusional view of the world. One that is actually held as true belief by a tiny minority. Unfortunately, the effects of “pluralistic ignorance” means that these zealots have a disproportionate influence on society. Pretty much like British nationalists in Scotland. 🙁
link to frontiersin.org
Correct Stu – “She will do nothing”.
She currently has a live mandate for indy ref 2. That expires in exactly 8 months! She isn’t using that mandate, so Boris knows she won’t use the new one in 2021.
Sturgeon has already given that mandate away, because she stated :” Indy Ref 2 will be in the 2021 manifesto”. So that is her conceding that she needs a new mandate. The question is , Why?
What does she want it for. Has she got a bulging trophy room in Bute House that she shows off at house parties.” Check out my mandates guys”! “Wow Nicola have you ever used one?” ….”Naw they are like classic cars, nice to have but not very practical. I just like having them”
Seriously though. Why does anyone think she has the wit or the balls to actually do something with a new mandate.
We need a new leader….please Jo challenge this charlatan.
Thought provoking article again Stu. Boris isn’t going to grant an S30 so we need alternatives.
The crowd funding to pay for the court case to show that the Scottish government doesn’t need permission to hold a independence referendum from Westminster has reached the half way point.
Bear in mind that on three separate occasions the Scottish government has tried to block this from happening Forward As One has reached the £159,000 pounds mark.
Ask yourselves this question if you dare, why hasn’t the Scottish government done this months, if not years ago,if Sturgeon wants independence with every fibre of her being as she put it, she would’ve surely found a way to do it, unless of course she already knows the answer, and that answer is not conducive with her plans.
Surgeon’s Twitter tells you everything. She hasn’t posted about the Westminster power grab for a couple of months. That’s not worth talking about so it seems. But she’s gushingly tweeted or retweeted about favourite author Ali Smith no less than 8 times in the last fortnight.
You think it’s only indyref2 Sturgeon is disinterested in? She should be rallying Scottish opinion about Johnson’s power grab. But she isn’t.
Breeks @ 9.36am
I agree with all you say.
As for “The Scotland Act did not change one single word in the 1707 Treaty of Union. I remain confused why altering (or clarifying) the terms of the colonial Scotland Act should demand such attention when we have a perfectly serviceable Sovereign Constitution making our ,,,”
Well, your point about the ineptitude of our scotgov goes some way to answering that – and, whatever might be the reality of our constitutional rights – the main point it – HOW are you going to demand them? What mechanism is there? The politicians aren’t – as you stated – so where is the backing to uphold these rights?
To make it a reality, there needs to be backing – the majority of people demanding them vociferously, politicians demanding it, anyone or group with clout demanding them, even an army to back it up – I don’t think we have any of these, so it remains a theoretical endeavour – so then the best route is via the Scotland Act, as the most expedient. That’s the one scotgov adheres to – so let’s clarify it, and hope it is in our favour so the scotgov is forced to take action.
This is a practical way of trying to achieve our goal. I would be very happy to see some real move to upholding our constitutional rights – just knowing they exist doesn’t mean they will be used though.
(I wish the cartoon would hurry up and arrive)
With all the British Nationalist flags and plaques being promoted across Scotland I am tempted to prepare a stencil with an amusing message to overlay these Unionist British Nationalist symbols. Perhaps the word “fail”.
BTW did I mention British Nationalism which I find very colonial and colonal.
Any other suggestions to “mitigate” the evil British Nationalist Unionist propaganda?
I do find it hard to believe the FM truly believes in the Scottish electorate’s democratic right to determine our constitutional future. If the SNP wasn’t the Scottish government, would they be able to recognise and call on international law? Or have they simply become a party of Westminster minions, and closet BritNats?
A cognitive account of belief: a tentative road map
link to frontiersin.org
Last night I tweeted that I’m blocked by Doug Daniel and don’t know why (which is true).
Cue dozens of replies from others who are blocked and didn’t know, many asking who the fuck he is.
So, the wokies are using some kind of list aimed at Yes supporters, specifically readers of this place?
Not very keen on spreading their message are they? Who on earth might that be?
Hmmm…
Check out the replies here:
link to twitter.com
‘Why on earth’!, although ‘who on earth?’ also appears frequently…
😉
Religion, but not as we know it.
link to spiked-online.com
It’s pure Manichaeism Jim.
I have always been in favour of lockdown as I believe a surge of unmanageable deaths
would rage across the country.
With the virus now 9-10 months old we still see new cases each and every day in the
Land where it developed.
There could be no more stringent enforcement than that applied in China and yet there virus there
Cannot be wiped out.
The Tories are handing out billions in contracts to companies that support them in return.
SNP are using it as an excuse not to progress independence and Trump trying to stop any
Election that would put him out of power.
There is no stopping this virus without a vaccine and despite the Tory claims of ordering billions of vaccines from different sources non are proven to work.
So many strange statists from around the globe.
It seems that Sweden with double our population and without lockdown has double our death rate?
Australia that had done so well in containing the virus now seems to have a stronger 2nd wave.
Poverty prevents countries like Brazil, India and Mexico from offering much in the way of resistance
To the virus and rioting and starvation look likely to kill large numbers.
link to drive.google.com
I have seen people repeat the ‘forever after’ clause in the Treaty of Union, but it only referred to the Kingdom, it makes no such claim when referring to the parliaments.
It also doesn’t not refer to the parliament as sovereign, it also does not state that in any parliament set up in Scotland the UK parliament will be sovereign over it, that is in complete contradiction of the sovereignty of the people of Scotland.
So if the people of Scotland vote to increase the power of the Scottish parliament then within the Treaty I can’t see what they can object to, it meets the constitutional requirements. The proviso is as yet we have never voted to do this by a majority.
Is Doug Daniel Woke of the Week?
The woke perspective is derived from black and third-world feminism, so it does not deny biology, but it does value epistemic integrity. Western politics is becoming infested with “radical trans-activists”, who aim to abolish the legal settlement between the sexes, of “equal but different”. They want it replaced with the legal settlement of “the same but unequal”, just like British constitutionalism intends for Scotland.
link to digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca
What is British nationalism?
link to research.edgehill.ac.uk
kapelmeister @ 10.09am
Not just over-tweeting re Ali Smith but also plugging an interview of favourite author Ali Smith by favourite “award-winning” “journo” Garavelli who, to judge from the trailers, will be making herself part of the “story” when (enabled by BBC Radio 4) she reveals how she has become a “target” for writing sympathetically about the alphabet sisters.
Tory power-grab? Independence? What’s that?
Victory over Japan 75th anniversary,
a lot of atrocities committed on soldiers and civilians by the Japanese Imperial Army,
15 – 20 million Chinese killed,
if China had surrendered it would have given Japan a massive industrial and manpower base that would have made it almost invincible in the far east,
from that base they could have attacked Russia which would mean Russia fighting on two fronts which would mean less troops to fight off the Germans, (no D Day ?),
China`s hard won role in halting the Japanese is the greatest pivotal point in WW2.
Pacman @ 8.59 14th August
Re AI, algorithims and – how do we deal with it?
We use humour and we use info graphics/posters.
We use posters in windows – cars/houses/work, bumper stickers, T shirts and home made billboards, we print off our own posters and we stick them on wheelie bins.
If we are really smart about it we pick one theme every 2 months so the whole of Scotland gets the message.
Remember one of our demographics to change from No to Yes is our pensioners, and the other – is tories (I know, not everyones cup of tea, but hey). Both those groups of voters won’t want to – or won’t be able to pay for private health care… which is coming very very soon without Indy.
And we campaign, we campaign and campaign, and we make it so that Indy is an unstoppable force – with or without Nicola.
Batak Obama used presidential executive powers like he was addicted. All presidents have recourse to that option.
There are too many wingers swallowing media propaganda on Trump.Yes he may be an asshile but fucking Biden for fucksake you would have to be blootered to vote for him.
The red arrows were obscured by cloud so no British Nationalist Unionist show today!
VJ day when we remember the donkeys who threw a huge Scottish army under the Japanese bus in Singapore. God Save the Queen.
Barak. computer misspells his name. The Devil protects his own.
Famous 15 do you think it was only Scots in the 14th Army.
Well done for remembering VJ Day .
Dogwhistle knows about US politics not.
Kamala will keep “Sleepy Joe” awake enough to end the “amazing” career of the lunatic Trump.
That reminds me we were discussing strange beliefs. 🙂
Self-Deception as Omission
link to static1.squarespace.com
Sturgeon the vacuous virtue signaller has much in common with G Galloway the Mark 1 virtue signaller. He could oatronize the hell out of Scots as he does with Black people.
Young ,gifted and Scots
Dogwhistle ,sure there were even Anzacs too and the donkeys were educated on the playing fields of Eton.
Now we’re cooking with gas, 😉
REALISM, INDIVIDUALISM, AND PLURALISM: THE METAPHYSICS AND ETHICS OF WILLIAM JAMES
link to etheses.whiterose.ac.uk
Kanaka Harris and her affair with an old married powerful man when in her twenties is no surprise as politics is full of pimps and whores .
If you support the corrupt Democrats then yours scoundrel.
Famous shrivelled scrote what is Sturgeons plan for Independence you political geniuse?
Why do I call him the great Trumpian “dogwhistle”? Google it!
Just noticed dogwhistle called the Democrat running mate “Kanaka” which is deeply offensive racism.
Dogwhistle be ashamed, be very ashamed!
Kamala computer doesn’t want to spell her name correctly either.
You’re being duped by the so called ‘left’
Barak Obama started the Libyan War the Syrian War he tried to set fire to Egypt .
He also personally ordered the deaths of American citizens by drone strike. You bent over fucking virtue signallers think the sun shines out of your leaders arse .Its time to grow
up and wise up.
Harris is a box ticking exercise.A few months ago she accused Biden of being a nonce now she’s happy to work with him? Away and fuck yourself Famous.
Talk of the S30 and the Scotland Act is all well and good. But I think people always miss some basics; that everything in the UK (incuding Scotland) is currently government by convention and the Scotland Act (1998) confers no powers whatsoever on Scotland, or its Parliament.
The reason the Scottish Government keeps being called an Executive, is because all power is reserved. Holyrood administers Westminster legislation and all – every single part – is reserved to Westminster (or the Crown by Order in Council) to alter, amend, rescind, or otherwise abolish as it sees fit.
The Scotland Act 1998 explicitly says so, severally.
The UK is also among a very small number of countries which still operates ex post facto legislation (most constitutions do not allow for that) So even beyond the fact that every single power is reserved to Westminster, its ability to ‘amend’ is also the ability to retroactively amend.
The only way to attack Westminster – to harm it (to make the conequences worse) is to attack its source of power and that source of legislative power – its ‘constitution’ – is the ‘Crown’.
Any legal dancing on the heads of pins in a court to gain an S30, will have to probe at the Crown in the form of Parliamentary Sovereignty; but they won’t directly, because they don’t have the bottle.
To attack the legislation, attack the power, attack the Crown directly and gain all.
Parliamentary Sovereignty is their only Achilles heel; which means severing the Union of Crowns or, literally replacing the Scottish Crown, or abolishing the Crown – by instructing the Scottish Crown.
It is not the sole prerogative of Westminster to invoke the powers of and to instruct a single Crown (Henry VIII powers of the English Crown) nor indeed is there a sole Privy Council. Other Crown Commonwealhs have used their own Orders in Council and caused constitutional ‘crisis’ before. Notwithstanding, the UK Government itself is no stranger to creating ‘constitutional crisis’, as the case of the Chagos Islanders attests.
The reason the phrase ‘constitutional crisis’ gets bandied about so much anent Scottish independence; is because everyone and their dug knows it must attack the Crown(s) not necessarily the Union of Kingdoms. The Crown(s) is the rock upon which the power of the unwritten constitution is based – its legislative power.
The only way to show that Scotland can lawfully hold a referendum if it chooses; is to show that the Crown of England’s writ does not run, the Scottish Crown does not dictate and that Westminster’s Parliamentary Sovereignty is not sound – to have the right to instruct the Scots Crown in Council.
It is not done by engaging some farcical charade over the implied meaning of a mere part of a section of the Scotland Act – because that will always fail – like Scotland’s ‘EU Continuity Bill’ – which failed because the Crown was not attacked. It could only ever fail and any similar attempt to wrest an S30 will fail, for the self same reason.
Any ‘victory’ on some moot point of UK law, may see the offending legislation amended, the decision overturned and done so ex post facto. All that power derives from the Crown.
If you can show that power does not apply, if you have the right to instruct your ‘Crown’; then there is no requirement to settle for a temporary transfer of power (S30) for all power has been won.
Not instant independence, not a severing of any Treaty, it wins the instant independence of the Scottish Parliament and with it the power to ‘Act’
There is not even any particular requirement to venture near a court to do so and the only defence, is for the Scots Crown to dictate matters otherwise…
*Awaits ‘talking shite’…
Dogwhistle I could offer you a course in anger management but they require proof of mental health.Sorry.
Trump will romp home in November I don’t think the Democrats can allow cities to be torched by their supporters without consequences at the election.
Dems threw dolly out their prom when the were beaten last time .
Famous do you actually know whats going on anywhere. Pissed up lunatic.
I’m angry because your first minister is a useless cunt.
And In sure I speak for many you’re fucking lucky we’re not face to face silly cunt.
Fuck your mother traiter
The American National Geographic magazine has a current special entitled Atlas of the British Empire. It’s pretty basic stuff but dived in scanning for any ref. to the Union treaty, the thing that put zing into BE. Nope not a mention.
Did it happen? Was it a bad dream?
There is literally no arguing with people who have TDS.
If he wins in November it’ll likely delay WW3 by another four years, so I will take that. It’s bigger picture stuff that matters for me (I really don’t care about internal US policies, why should I, I don’t live there) but the fact he walked into N Korea and shook hands (de-escalating regional tensions) and stood up to the hawks with being drawn into a war with Iran, is enough for me to see past the ‘noise’.
If Obama had done the former, he would’ve got the Nobel peace prize for that alone. What bothers me is that people champion BO simply because he is black (and that is quite worrying) – the man literally reneged on the non-proliferation treaty with Russia – and no one noticed.
easy, dogwhistle, and maybe make a few apologies.
Both Trump and BoJo represent the temporary victory of post-truth right-wing populism, but both administrations are unleashing a toxic politics of narcissistic exceptionalism.
link to ase.tufts.edu
jfngw says:
15 August, 2020 at 10:47 am
I have seen people repeat the ‘forever after’ clause in the Treaty of Union, but it only referred to the Kingdom, it makes no such claim when referring to the parliaments.
Marriage has a ‘forever after’ clause, – ‘til death do us part’, yet plenty marriages end in divorce.