The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



Picking up the gauntlet 116

Posted on July 21, 2017 by

We’ll be honest with you here, readers – even though it’s only July, when it comes to sheer ham-fisted, tin-eared, clown-shoed, foot-shooting idiocy we didn’t think anything in Scottish politics in 2017 could possibly top the SNP’s decision that the surefire way to win back voters after a poor election result was literally mutilating puppies.

After all, that’s the sort of thing you say as a self-evidently ludicrous and hyperbolic joke: “Ha ha, the SNP are so dominant in Scotland these days that the only way they could lose an election would be if Nicola Sturgeon went on telly and started hacking the tails off week-old puppy-dogs without anaesthetic! LOL!!!!!”

It couldn’t even be defended as a grotesque but cynically cunning attempt to win votes from the rural hunting-and-fishing lobby – they did it right AFTER the election, when all those people had just gone out and voted Tory anyway.

But bless their hearts, Scottish Labour never once saw a low bar that they didn’t try to slither under, and today they pulled off the seemingly impossible.

Read the rest of this entry →

The Decency Charter 374

Posted on April 23, 2017 by

This site has spoken a few times, usually in jest, about forming its own political party and contesting elections. But as the UK heads for the biggest democratic trainwreck in its history – a vote which, depending on where you live, is really either a proxy Brexit referendum, a proxy independence referendum, a judgement on the personal character of Jeremy Corbyn or any of half-a-dozen other things – we found ourselves thinking again about what, on the fundamental ideological level, we’d stand for.

It’s a question that existing parties find it remarkably hard to answer. Labour used to define it clearly in its key “Clause IV” – a clear statement of commitment to socialist principles like public ownership and wealth redistribution – before Tony Blair junked it in the 1990s for some woolly neoliberal rubbish from an aspirational Facebook meme.

For the SNP, clearly its primary defining goal is always the democratic pursuit of independence for Scotland. What you might call its day-to-day policies have, like most parties, varied and evolved over time, but it’s always had that one clear unifying and overriding aim. It may have won electoral success through decent governance, but its purpose was never merely competent administration for its own sake.

In the case of the Conservative Party, the turn-of-the-20th-century US economist John Kenneth Galbraith summed up their position pithily and accurately:

“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”

(And lest an offended Tory should seek to instantly dismiss him as some flavour of pinko tree-hugging bleeding-heart lefty, he also said: “Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it’s just the opposite.”.)

The Liberal Democrats, of course, stand for being in the middle of Labour and the Conservatives, whatever that means on any given day. (They did briefly experiment in the 2000s with being to the left of Labour, partly because it was hard NOT to be, but the coalition scuppered that and now they’re basically Tory wets.)

But what about us?

Read the rest of this entry →

We need to talk about the oil 255

Posted on January 21, 2017 by

The link between the rise of modern Scottish nationalism and the production of North Sea oil is pretty indisputable. Both took off in the early seventies, with that decade’s campaigns powered by the slogan “It’s Scotland’s Oil” and it’s still a given in media circles that the desirability or even the feasibility of Scottish self-government depends principally on the spot price of Brent crude.

I’ve always found that argument a bizarre one, firstly because it takes no account of people’s emotional attachments to either the UK or Scotland, and secondly because as this site has repeatedly pointed out Scotland is both a producer and consumer of hydrocarbon fuels, so low or high prices are neither an unalloyed good or an unalloyed bad thing for her citizens.

petrolprice

What is incontestable is that the revenue from 45 years of North Sea production has not been well managed by the United Kingdom in comparison to the other states who have benefited from this bounty.

So far so uncontentious.

Outside of constitutional questions, party politics in Scotland revolves around health, education and jobs, with every party more or less in favour of all three. But what if there was an existential threat not just to this trinity but to our entire way of life? Where would that fit in to our politics?

Read the rest of this entry →

The unhappy 11% 299

Posted on September 18, 2016 by

The Sunday Times has a new Panelbase poll out today, and it borrows a question that was first asked by this website (via the same pollster) 14 months ago. These were the results this month:

idealeu

They broadly show little change from when we asked last year (for the five options the changes are +1, 0, -3, +8 and -5), suggesting that the main practical upshot of the EU referendum campaign was to halve the number of Don’t Knows, which was achieved by shifting almost all of them straight onto the Leave side with the Remain camp’s abysmal recreation of Better Together’s “Project Fear”.

Nevertheless, the chart is a fascinating and pertinent one. Because while there’s only one of the four non-DK groups in the list who definitely can’t get what they want, there’s another one whose decision will be a lot harder than Yes supporters would like.

Read the rest of this entry →

Soapbox: From your tether unwind 333

Posted on January 23, 2016 by

Governments, of all political stripes and nations, are often accused of being control freaks bent on constructing and enforcing a “nanny state”, where citizens’ freedoms are arbitrarily curtailed under a pretence of it all being for their own good.

Things from banning smoking and routinely snooping on private emails to forbidding people from wearing certain types of hats or expressing unpopular opinions (or even popular ones simply deemed unacceptable by a self-selecting elite) are justified for all sorts of social and economic reasons.

sweetsugar

But where, if anywhere, should the line be drawn?

Read the rest of this entry →

Unscheduled day off 269

Posted on October 10, 2015 by

Because this isn’t the fairer, better, equal Scotland we’re fighting for.

quotas

See you tomorrow, readers.

The Tory who voted Yes 211

Posted on August 08, 2015 by

“In an independent Scotland, we’ll never have to worry about Tory governments again”, said the man on my doorstep, his YES badge gleaming in the sunshine.

“I am a Tory,” said I, watching with some amusement as the man’s jaw dropped.

toryballoons

“But I’ll still be voting Yes,” I added.

Read the rest of this entry →

The end really is nigh 146

Posted on July 18, 2015 by

This week, as the UK’s new Conservative government brought forward a bill to impose tax on renewable energy projects, just seven Labour MPs turned up to oppose it.

labrenew

You know these guys that you used to see wandering round the city centre with a sandwich board telling us “THE END IS NIGH”? It seems they were right.

Read the rest of this entry →

Soapbox: On A Boat 70

Posted on June 28, 2015 by

I was on my way to work in London the other morning when I heard someone talking on his mobile phone. He was a white English man in his thirties, wearing builder’s gear, presumably on his way to work too. We were heading in the same direction, so I listened to his end of the conversation as we walked along.

He was in mid-rant when I first clocked him, complaining about drug addicts and alcoholics living on benefits, while he had to get up and go to work. “I’m on my way to work too,” I thought, and the only thing that bothers me about the thought of drug addicts and alcoholics lying around at home or still asleep on the streets is the utter waste of human lives it involves.

onaboat

But of course, I was on my way to a job I love, and even though I would happily write comedy whether or not I was paid for it, I’m guessing that my job probably pays a lot more than his does. And from the tone of his voice, I don’t think he was looking forward to his day’s work nearly as much as I was looking forward to mine.

Read the rest of this entry →

Soapbox: The Hangman’s Lottery 351

Posted on February 14, 2015 by

In September 2011, a group of US state employees took a man called Troy Davis from his prison cell in Atlanta, Georgia to a small room and strapped him to a gurney. They inserted a needle into one of his veins, hooked it up to some tubes connected to a machine and pressed a button on the machine, knowing that it would cause lethal chemicals to be pumped into his bloodstream until he died of asphyxiation.

These people – every one of whom doubtless considered themselves an ordinary, decent, caring member of society – participated willingly in the killing despite knowing that there was an enormous degree of doubt as to whether Davis was in any way responsible for the death of the man in whose name he was being executed.

Bafflingly, very few people found this behaviour at all odd.

Read the rest of this entry →

Soapbox: Happy hours 371

Posted on February 07, 2015 by

So, an experiment. Here on Wings we don’t tend to deal very much in specific political issues, other than independence. We’re not aligned to any party, and our primary goal is to see Scotland become a national democracy in which all voices can be heard. We happen to be on the left of the political spectrum, but that’s neither here nor there while Scotland’s politics are at the mercy of the whims of voters elsewhere.

But just for a change of pace at the weekends, when there tends not to be much happening, we thought we might try having a space where broader ideas can be debated outwith the framework of the constitutional debate or party politics. If there’s something you’d like to talk about in front of a sizeable audience, drop us a line.

soapbox1

To give you an idea of what we mean, we’re going to start off by outlining a personal pet idea we’ve had for years, and which is an attempt to tackle one of Scotland’s most toxic problems – alcohol abuse. It’s a simple concept, it’s cheap to implement, it doesn’t punish the innocent and it seems like it’d work. See what you think.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,719 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • agent x on Too Tight To Mention: ““Police preparing for Donald Trump to visit Scotland The Scottish government said it was working with the UK government to…Jul 9, 17:49
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Too Tight To Mention: “See following Wings over Scotland article ‘Death from above’ (March 13, 2012). Stu writes: « We have a paid subscription…Jul 9, 17:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Midgies tae. When oor junkies and jakies start being stealed an a’, we’ll ken we’re in the end game.Jul 9, 17:45
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “@AndrewR Sorry, but when it come to that kind of people, being heartless is the only language they understand. We’ve…Jul 9, 17:42
    • James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Captain caveman, 12:04 pm. Actually the programme I am watching is How to Save England, -. The word England being…Jul 9, 17:03
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Does any left of centre politician care about the young people born in the UK, sam? Much of the evidence…Jul 9, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “TL;DRJul 9, 16:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Sae true, NC, the scribblin is oan the wa. In fact, it’s only going to be (checks notes) 4-5 years…Jul 9, 16:40
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “When you don’t know what you think you know. Cambridge Journal of Economics Cover Image for Volume 44, Issue 2…Jul 9, 16:36
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “I’ve just run a couple of searches on ChatGPT for for similar search criteria. Which is helpful and revealing because…Jul 9, 16:32
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Not many people agree with you. https://www.derby.ac.uk/blog/margaret-thatchers-legacy/ Survey results In January and February 2019, researchers at the University of Derby…Jul 9, 16:28
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Great stuff sam. Now do the type of “personality” that posts interminably about pricks, penises, wanking, shirt lifting, glory holes…Jul 9, 16:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “James says: “Brexit” Aw, we need to crowdfund the boy a dictionary. Turn doon the page corner on the letter…Jul 9, 16:16
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Heh. So you couldn’t back up any of your earlier bullshit claims then. Imagine my surprise. Whatever, dick.Jul 9, 16:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Too Tight To Mention: “Aren’t we gonna be keeping the Pound, Confused? How does that fact fit into your fevered fantasies?Jul 9, 16:10
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Yet more bollocks. Give it up, pal. No-one is listening.Jul 9, 15:58
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “@Aidan; “@Xaracen – you beautifully highlight the major challenge with AI. Because people like yourself are filling the internet with…Jul 9, 15:45
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Your quoted post fails to consider the alternative under Michael Foot’s Labour. I think we can safely assume it would’ve…Jul 9, 15:38
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “Scott-Samuel et al “The aggressive promotion of free market policies under Thatcher was accompanied by the growing influence of business…Jul 9, 15:15
    • Confused on Too Tight To Mention: ““here’s what you could have won … ” https://archive.is/mHvKx “- they are doing well enough, but imagine how great these…Jul 9, 15:03
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: ““An Intolerant Personality Type is someone who displays a very limited tolerance for differences in opinions or beliefs. They tend…Jul 9, 14:57
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “intolerance. “…we discuss the psychology of three understandings of intolerance that are concealed within the literature: (a) prejudicial intolerance based…Jul 9, 14:53
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: ““@CC – well exactly, does anyone think a website like this would be tolerated in the PRC?” Yes, exactly Aidan,…Jul 9, 14:30
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “In reply to P3nisbreath @ 3.11 am (yes 3.11am!!!!) And your point is caller, “whanging oan” yet again about the…Jul 9, 14:25
    • Captain Caveman on Too Tight To Mention: “Whoosh. Way to miss the point, pal, with your straw man boilerplate pish. I didn’t say “James” had to be…Jul 9, 14:23
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@CC – well exactly, does anyone think a website like this would be tolerated in the PRC?Jul 9, 13:48
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Xaracen – you beautifully highlight the major challenge with AI. Because people like yourself are filling the internet with nonsensical…Jul 9, 13:44
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “Aw, thank you – we are indeed blessed by the munificence of the unionists! Thank you for inclusion in the…Jul 9, 13:34
    • AndrewR on Too Tight To Mention: “Hatey, have a heart. (Heartey!) Did you never do anything stupid, aged 15? Maybe not as stupid as going to…Jul 9, 13:26
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “This morning I asked three different AIs the following question; Has the JPTI/Salvo Petition to the UN been rejected? None…Jul 9, 13:09
  • A tall tale



↑ Top