The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Minding your own business

Posted on April 05, 2012 by

Pretty much every newspaper and media source ran with a particular statistic as their headline from the published conclusions of the UK government's consultation on the independence referendum. More or less everywhere led with the 75% of respondents who wanted a single Yes/No question, which is mildly curious because it's not really news – the stated preference of every party and MSP in the Scottish Parliament, and the Scottish Government itself, is already for a single question.

The Secretary of State for Scotland loudly proclaimed that the consultation had therefore delivered a mandate to get on with the referendum on the UK government's terms, meaning a single question as quickly as possible and no votes for 16/17-year-olds. But the respondents to the consultation actually presented a much more significant demand: a similarly large majority of them – 72% – expressed the view that what they really wanted the UK government to do was butt the hell out altogether and give the Scottish Government the power to get on with it.

For some reason, Moore and the Scottish media weren't so keen to draw attention to that particular finding. But it would appear to mean that the electorate overwhelmingly want the Scottish Parliament – the only body which has an actual democratic mandate to hold a referendum on independence at all – to handle the entire matter without interference from Moore and his coalition colleagues.

We look forward, therefore, to the Scottish Secretary and his chums – having made their point and stated their views – keeping their noses out from now on, waiting for the Scottish Government to conclude its own (far more popular) consultation, and make its own decisions about the number and wording of the questions, the timing of the vote and the extent of the franchise. As democrats, we're sure they'll happily comply with the wishes of the people.

2 to “Minding your own business”

  1. Doug Daniel says:

    Another figure that seems to have been missed (or maybe it hasn't – I've been ill the past few days so I'm not as on top of the news as usual) is that 71% of those who responded to the question on the voting franchise agree with the Scottish Government (and the UK government, apparently) that it should be based on residency, like the Scottish Elections, rather than the Westminster election franchise. Only 4% back the ridiculous idea of letting everyone in the UK vote on it. So, assuming the Scottish Government's consultation backs this up, then hopefully those two particularly pathetic arguments can be put to bed.
     
    Not only that, but it shows opinion is completely divided over votes at 16 (44% for, 47% against – although they still manage to point out that "more" were against it), so it will be very interesting to see what the figure is in the Scottish Government's consultation (i.e. the REAL consultation).
     
    One final observation – responses from the public are as moronic as you might expect. I hope they're better in the real consultation; and true to form, Westminster are excellent at spinning neutral responses to sound like they back their point.
     
    Oh, and the fact that A Boyd Tunnock of the outspokenly unionist Tunnocks (not sure why Salmond continues to offer people caramel wafers with their tea) thinks the referendum needs to be as quick as humanly possible does not hold much sway with me. And I don't need to know how fat he is either ("As a reasonably large employer in Scotland…") I also don't care about members of the public parroting lines they've heard on the news about "the damaging uncertainty" – this adds nothing.
     
    A final point – look at the list of respondents, and look for the political parties. SNP (various branches), Scottish Labour (wow, Jim Sillars' defunct party has been resurrected?) and Scottish Liberal Democrats. No Greens, no SSP, and most importantly, the only Tory response is from the London Scottish Conservative Club.
     
    So the Scottish Tories didn't even respond to their own consultation. Unbelievable.

    Reply
  2. Tony Boaks says:

    There was a far easier way of discrediting the UK consultation. Less than 3000 responses in a country of 5 million is 0.06%. So any figure of 75% is 75% of 0.06% of the population: 0.045%.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,918 Posts, 1,243,523 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Bob Johnston on Pandora’s Campervan: “I thought Grace Mugabe, sorry Peter Murrell, look quite untroubled in court. Then I remembered the missing quarter of a…Jun 2, 18:13
    • Terry on Pandora’s Campervan: “Woo hoo! Just seen you on stv news. Fantastic! If ever there was an embodiment of the saying “the truth…Jun 2, 18:10
    • Dan on Pandora’s Campervan: “Well, I can recall with interest Craig Murray stating there may have been something bigger in the mix when the…Jun 2, 18:07
    • Alf Baird on Pandora’s Campervan: ““this stupid guy is in charge of a Country!” Correction, he is heading up a colonial administration which by its…Jun 2, 17:47
    • Bilbo on Pandora’s Campervan: “More important than all of this. PayPal Kavanagh is off sick again. Dig deep and click on that donate button…Jun 2, 17:38
    • agentx on Pandora’s Campervan: “He told reporters that there had been a “colossal breach of trust”. Swinney said that while the party’s systems were…Jun 2, 17:16
    • Tenruh on Pandora’s Campervan: “Got the answer above at 2.23Jun 2, 17:14
    • Tenruh on Pandora’s Campervan: “Heard today that Murrell and Swinney have been friends since childhood,any truth in that?Jun 2, 17:08
    • AdamH on Pandora’s Campervan: “That Tommy Sheppard article He (now) knows exactly what went wrong yet seems to have no recognition of being 1…Jun 2, 16:48
    • Anne on Pandora’s Campervan: “Is it not more likely that this excess of pointless bling purchasing and overspend on office refurbishment is a way…Jun 2, 16:34
    • Ebok on Pandora’s Campervan: “It’s difficult to put into words the appreciation for, and admiration of, the sheer volume and depth of work being…Jun 2, 16:16
    • agentx on Pandora’s Campervan: “Why embezzle a camper van and never use it?Jun 2, 15:34
    • Ian on Pandora’s Campervan: “Incidentally, when those figures for ‘audio visual’ came out, I remember trying to compile a realistic invoice for a conference…Jun 2, 15:30
    • agentx on Pandora’s Campervan: “Murrell was CEO of SNP from 2001. Murrell married Sturgeon in July 2010 The offences started 12 August 2010. ———————————————–…Jun 2, 15:25
    • Alf Baird on Pandora’s Campervan: ““The Brits are past masters in dirty trickery, subversion, great gaming” Indeed, and especially so in the ‘strategic’ colonies where…Jun 2, 15:25
    • Ian on Pandora’s Campervan: “Given that the motor home was never used, and stuffed full of ‘luxury’ goods, you can’t help thinking that Murrell…Jun 2, 15:23
    • 100%Yes on Pandora’s Campervan: “What ever surplus money the SNP got he or them just spent it on what ever they wanted, wither it…Jun 2, 14:53
    • Cynicus on Pandora’s Campervan: ““Begs the question, why did the Crown feel they had to agree to a deal? Could they not have proved…Jun 2, 14:44
    • 100%Yes on Pandora’s Campervan: “Sturgeon forced to answer for herself on national TV, with crocodile tears, only to turn round and say what have…Jun 2, 14:37
    • Rogueslr on Pandora’s Campervan: “With only 4 miles on the camper van it should make a good price at auction. But, I am left…Jun 2, 14:34
    • BigJay on Pandora’s Campervan: “There was an interesting article in the Sunday Times, part of which outlined the Swinney/Murrell connection from their schooldays, church…Jun 2, 14:23
    • Cynicus on Pandora’s Campervan: “absolutely!Jun 2, 14:22
    • agentx on Pandora’s Campervan: “PUBLIC FUNDS £8,143,658.37 in Short Money from the House of Commons £2,437,821.47 in policy development grants from the Electoral Commission…Jun 2, 14:21
    • Iain Ross on The View From Row Z: “The van should be shown in the Balance Sheet at cost price (ex VAT) less accumulated depreciation. Not sure what…Jun 2, 14:19
    • Andy Wiltshire on Pandora’s Campervan: “Exactly! Come on Wingers, there must be a lawyer here who can address this vital point.Jun 2, 14:13
    • RobertG on Pandora’s Campervan: “I also wonder if the deliberate own goal decision to go to the Supreme Court over indyref2 was part of…Jun 2, 14:12
    • Rocky on Pandora’s Campervan: “Who were the Sloggi knickers for?Jun 2, 14:09
    • Jim Anderson on Pandora’s Campervan: “Getting interesting as the extent and timing of the control failures by Beattie and Sturgeon that favoured Murrell’s criminality are…Jun 2, 14:05
    • barelybare on Pandora’s Campervan: ““I’ve been through the 107 pages of items bought by Peter Murrell” Keep in mind that BBC list excludes all…Jun 2, 13:59
    • Al-Stuart on Pandora’s Campervan: “. Hi Stuart. Thanks for your excellent Pandora’s Box article. I’ve been through the 107 pages of items bought by…Jun 2, 13:49
  • A tall tale



↑ Top