The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Arithmetic for beginners

Posted on June 07, 2012 by

We would be lying if we said we were surprised by Johann Lamont’s line of attack at today’s First Minister’s Questions, but “dismayed, disappointed and depressed” would be a fair enough summary. With her finger as ever on the pulse of what really matters to the Scottish public, for some reason the Labour quasi-leader chose to repeat last week’s bewildering and incomprehensible assault about the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of England. (Possibly because it garnered her some rare good press from the Unionist section of the Scottish media.)

The situation is in fact a straightforward one, which Lamont and Labour are doing their best to complicate and obfuscate in furtherance of their own agenda. The Bank of England – which despite the name is the central bank of the United Kingdom – is an independent body, and has been since Gordon Brown surrendered Government control of it in 1997. While the Treasury retains certain emergency powers, in all normal circumstances the Bank’s activities in respect of the UK’s monetary policy are determined by the MPC, which has no Government representatives on it.

(A minority of the committee’s members – four out of nine – are appointed by the Treasury, but are all external, non-political advisers.)

The SNP’s policy is that an independent Scotland would negotiate as part of the independence process a Scottish voice on the MPC (presumably an appointee along the same lines as those of the Treasury), given that Scotland currently “owns” 8% of the BoE. At present there is nobody on the Committee specifically tasked with representing the interests of Scotland, which is an entirely unsurprising and unsinister state of affairs – as a UK body, the Bank’s responsibility is to the UK as a whole, and at such times as Scotland’s interests might conflict with those of the wider UK, the Bank’s duty is clearly, quite properly, to act in the interests of the majority at all times.

Johann Lamont, and the Unionist cause in general, has gleefully seized on an uncharacteristically sloppy choice of words by Nicola Sturgeon during BBC Scotland’s “Big Debate” last month, in which she presented Scotland’s future representation on the MPC as axiomatic rather than merely a goal. Scottish representation on the Committee would in fact be the realistic and reasonable outcome of any independence negotiations, given both Scotland’s part-ownership of the bank and the simple realpolitik of the economics that would arise from the dissolution of the Union, but it’s clearly not a done deal and Sturgeon was careless to present it as one.

Nevertheless, that does nothing to obscure the inherent disingenuousness and dishonesty of the point Lamont has spent two FMQ sessions clumsily attempting to make. The fact is that Scotland has no form of representation now on the MPC, and (more crucially) as we noted two paragraphs above, the MPC has no duty to consider the impact of its policies on Scotland specifically – indeed, if anything it has the opposite responsibility. So even in the worst-case scenario of failing to secure any representation, Scotland would be no worse off independent than it is now.

Equally crucially, and more pertinently to what passes for Lamont’s argument, the same thing applies to the Treasury. In all situations, the duty of the UK government is to the whole UK, not to any individual region of it. Regardless of the nationality of a Chancellor Of The Exchequer, if faced with a decision where the interests of Scotland and those of the wider UK were to be somehow mutually exclusive, it is ALWAYS that Chancellor’s duty to decide in favour of the UK.

Once again, there is nothing evil or wrong about this. For as long as Scotland chooses to remain inside the Union, its national interests will and must rightly be subordinate to, and subsumed within, those of the UK. Lamont’s insistence that Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling or any future Scottish-born UK Chancellor would ever abdicate their responsibilites and act against the interests of the UK simply because they happened to be born in Scotland is insulting both to the men in question and to the intelligence of the nation. (It also borders on racist, but we’ll let that slide for now.)

By definition, then, Scotland CANNOT possibly have less influence over its monetary or fiscal policy should it become independent than it does within the UK, because it currently has – and must have – none at all. It is, not for the first time, embarrassing to watch Lamont peddle this fatuous, mendacious drivel on behalf of the ever-shrinking proportion of the Scottish people who still vote Labour. They deserve better.

7 to “Arithmetic for beginners”

  1. Tris says:

    Lamont thought she had a hit on the first minister last week, for the first time ever. Indeed it certainly looked like it at the time.

    Analysis of the actuality not being her strong point, doubtless she will continue to raise the point on a weekly basis (given the deputy first minister’s unfortunate choice of words).

    I do hope Lamot reads your post and gets a slightly more mature and educated slant on the subject.

    Otherwise she is going to get very boring. OK, very more boring. 

    Reply
  2. R Louis says:

    The difficulty with Lamont, is that with issues such as banking and finance, I seriously doubt she really understands the subject.  

    She either believes what she is saying is very clever (without realising how daft she sounds) or she genuinely does not understand the subject.

    Either way, it is ineffective, as the average joe finds it tedious.  It also makes FMQ’s very easy for Salmond. 

    Reply
  3. John says:

    link to heraldscotland.com
    Bank of UK not England – Colin Donald
    “To seek to give the impression that institutions based in London are by definition unreliable when it comes to upholding the interests of all parts of the UK is not helpful to the Yes campaign’s bid to win credibility with business.”

    I think they are by definition unreliable, but that goes with being a main plank of the rotten to the core Union … However the theory that they should consider the Scottish economy rings true and therefore should not be dismissed .. no doubt it’ll be all over Question time later today.

    Reply
  4. molly says:

    Personally,perhaps the question she should be asked is why is there no representative from Scotland ,Wales and N Ireland  at the bank of the UK already ?

    Reply
  5. Tony Little says:

    The final answer by AS was the best rebuttal to the question about the MPC.  It is the FISCAL powers that are critical, and the power to manage ALL the revenue, and not play around with 8 – 18% (or whatever the figure will be after the Scotland Bill is enacted in 2016 – although with luck that bill will wither on the vine in Autumn 2014!)

    Reply
  6. Arbroath1320 says:

    If I were an advisor to wee Jimmie (thankfully I’m not! :D) I would be advising her to stay WELL clear of mentioning ANYTHING about the previous TWO incumbents of number 11.
     
    Let’s face it these guys did NOT do ANYTHING that put Scotland in a positive light. It all started with Gordy’s INSPIRED decision to sell off the U.K. gold reserve at ROCK BOTTOM prices and just continued on a downward spiral!
     
    link to youtube.com
     
    Just wondering how wee Jimmie will get on tonight, without the help of her faceless advisors. Will she be able to answer ANY question, or will we get a continual “Stronger together…….” response out of her?

    Reply
  7. Appleby says:

    It’s hard to know if Lamont is really ignorant of “Brown’s Bottom” and other flops by Labour or if she is trying really hard to avoid thinking about or mentioning it. Some brass neck to try and criticise others when there are such obvious faults in her own party that she never acknowledges or assures us are fixed somehow.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,785 Posts, 1,221,599 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “Gaun yersel Aidan, tell us aw aboot oor zero-growth unner-developed and plunnerred colonial economy aye rin bi a bunch o…Jul 8, 07:40
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “Let’s rewind back a bit, go back to any WoS post from May or earlier and the plan was very…Jul 8, 06:18
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Dangerous stuff. The more boxes that are ticked that say “ye just Cannae dae it” and that we are in…Jul 8, 05:07
    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “Brilliant!Jul 8, 01:33
    • Dunx on Too Tight To Mention: “The UK has a veto in the UN Security Council, not the General Assembly . The GA is a talking…Jul 8, 00:41
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “I suspect not MB. The problem I have with the Jacobite rebellions is the whole “using” thing the exiled Stuart’s…Jul 8, 00:24
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “LOLz 🙂Jul 7, 23:57
    • Stuart on Too Tight To Mention: “Would that be the same UN General Assembly where the UK Government can wield a veto? Why yes it is!…Jul 7, 23:21
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: “Only one page on JPTI appears relevant, Aidan, and it doesn’t say what you asserted. JPTI states on its site…Jul 7, 22:52
    • sarah on Too Tight To Mention: “Liberation’s case has to be approved by the General Assembly of the UN. That is well known. The route to…Jul 7, 22:28
    • Oneliner on Too Tight To Mention: “Not My KingJul 7, 22:27
    • Confused on Too Tight To Mention: “I like to think of it this way : an analogy Scotland is like Auschwitz (rich industrial area, but not…Jul 7, 22:10
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Too Tight To Mention: ““The foundational function of the State is the monopolistic organization of the power of the sword over a territorial cultural…Jul 7, 22:07
    • James on Too Tight To Mention: “I quite agree, “Chas” is indeed a unionist prick. Well said.Jul 7, 21:56
    • Northcode on Too Tight To Mention: “Leah Gunn Barrett has this to say about the Darien Scheme. The Darien Myth and the Origins of the Union…Jul 7, 21:53
    • Mark Beggan on Too Tight To Mention: “Pity the Jacobites didn’t win. Young English nationalists would be talking of the slaughter of London, the burning of Winchester.…Jul 7, 21:46
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Alf – I constantly praise Scotland and talk up its strengths both here and in person. Can the same be…Jul 7, 21:37
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “@Xaracen – it’s on the JPTI website. If you want the actual wording you’ll need to email JPTI or persuade…Jul 7, 21:35
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: ““they talk about our history and culture as being ancient guff but not one of them has ever presented anything…Jul 7, 21:19
    • Xaracen on Too Tight To Mention: ““The Committee on Decolonisation has said conclusively that the case of Scotland won’t even be considered in any session as…Jul 7, 21:14
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “Chas Well first because it’s interesting, second because it’s pertinent to much of the discussion going on here and lastly…Jul 7, 21:12
    • Aidan on Too Tight To Mention: “No it doesn’tJul 7, 20:59
    • Anthem on Too Tight To Mention: “Looking forward to hearing about it Sarah.Jul 7, 20:55
    • Chas on Too Tight To Mention: “Why? The past has passed.Jul 7, 20:55
    • sarah on Too Tight To Mention: “Liberation’s case to the UN continues.Jul 7, 20:43
    • Young Lochinvar on Too Tight To Mention: “I reckon with the current thread toing and froing on the subject of colonies and colonialism and the Act of…Jul 7, 20:42
    • Alf Baird on Too Tight To Mention: “““Resort to violence to keep control.” Can you give me a recent example of when The Uk Gov has done…Jul 7, 19:48
    • sam on Too Tight To Mention: “The riots in George Square 1919. These were protests about working conditions that so alarmed the UK gov that they…Jul 7, 19:46
    • agent x on Too Tight To Mention: “i find it very strange that how things have developed on here. “I am a proud Scot that demands Independence”.…Jul 7, 19:34
    • Dan on Too Tight To Mention: “One ponders how you managed to see and respond to a post within 1 minute, when it takes up to…Jul 7, 18:57
  • A tall tale



↑ Top