The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



Joining the dots 242

Posted on November 23, 2013 by

So we’re pretty embarrassed that we’ve only just put these two things together. We’ve been spending a fair bit of time recently pointing out that there’s almost no chance of the Barnett Formula – in essence, a mechanism for returning to Scotland some of the excess money it sends to Westminster in the form of oil revenue and tax receipts – being retained after the next UK general election.

We’ve also spent a good six months highlighting that the possibility of Holyrood being given “more tax powers” after a No vote is actually a trap, not in reality offering more power at all, but more responsibility. (Because it does you no good to have to collect your own tax revenue – the power lies in deciding how your tax revenue is spent.)

dottodot

And duh, it’s taken us till now to see the connection. Boy, is our face red.

Read the rest of this entry →

Quoted for interest 95

Posted on November 21, 2013 by

Here’s the Labour First Minister of Wales, Carwyn Jones, one year ago:

“Asked if he could see Barnett reformed without touching the current generous allocation of funds to Scotland, Mr Jones said:

‘It would be difficult to envisage a situation where there would be widespread Barnett reform with an independence referendum pending in Scotland, and with a Scottish Chief Secretary to the Treasury I think that’s unlikely. The problem has been in years gone by that you can’t address the Barnett Formula unless you address the whole of it.’

The First Minister said it was difficult to predict a timescale because there was no timetable for the first step – Barnett reform. Asked whether he got a sense from Danny Alexander that he had an appetite for reform, Mr Jones said:

‘No, I don’t – and I can understand why. He’s a Scottish Chief Secretary to the Treasury. Reforming a system that wouldn’t help Scotland is not something that would be high on his agenda. I certainly can’t see it happening before 2014 and the Scottish referendum.‘”

Jones is all over the papers today with his bizarre delusions-of-influence assertion that he would have some sort of veto over a Sterling currency union between the rUK and an independent Scotland (“Wales could block efforts by an independent Scotland to join a pound-sharing pact”, reports the Scotsman).

For perspective, imagine Alex Salmond being given a veto over the result of a UK referendum to leave the EU. Stop laughing, the article’s not finished yet.

Read the rest of this entry →

It’s a trap! 106

Posted on November 01, 2013 by

Blair McDougall, director of “Better Together”, Dundee University, 30 October 2013:

“UK ministers are not going to fall into the trap of acting against Scotland until Scotland decides to leave the United Kingdom”

blairsdu

You heard it straight from the horse’s – well, let’s be kind and say “mouth”, folks.

Read the rest of this entry →

Quoted for proof 154

Posted on September 26, 2013 by

Because we keep telling you what a No vote really means:

“That is why I am talking quite passionately about getting English Labour MPs back up the road and for me, sitting down with Neil [Findlay] and Richard [Simpson] and Rhoda [Grant] and others and saying, let’s get health policies that can be consistent across England, Scotland and Wales.

Wouldn’t that be a good thing, pulling in the same direction as opposed to pulling our separate ways?

Devolution, in its early days, was about doing something different and it needs to enter a different phase where we start talking again more about a UK-wide policy because in the end, that helps everybody.”

That’s Labour’s shadow health secretary Andy Burnham talking to Holyrood Magazine this week, in comments strangely unpublicised in the rest of the Scottish media.

Read the rest of this entry →

Throwing mud in glass houses 114

Posted on September 24, 2013 by

There’s been a certain amount of hoo-haa within the independence camp this morning about a Telegraph piece reporting comments by Labour’s shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran in which she appears to cast doubt on whether devolution has been a good thing for Scotland at all.

curran

We’re not sure why, because they’re nothing we weren’t telling you almost a year ago.

Read the rest of this entry →

The thieves of devolution 58

Posted on October 16, 2012 by

It’s probably fair to say that the opposition parties in the Scottish Parliament have reacted badly to the SNP’s victory in two consecutive Holyrood elections, especially the 2011 one in which the nationalists secured an unprecedented overall majority. Scottish Labour in particular has never really fully come to terms with its rejection by the electorate in a place where it has regarded power as a birthright for half a century, as can be seen by its constant demands to be consulted over legislation despite the voters unequivocally choosing to exclude the party from government and placing their trust in the SNP alone until at least 2016.

Despite enacting some highly controversial policies in its first 18 months as a majority (minimum pricing, the anti-sectarianism bill and equal-marriage legislation), polls consistently suggest that if anything, the gap in popularity between the SNP and Labour is growing as Johann Lamont’s party indulges in factional infighting and alienates its core voters by adopting neoliberal policies from its UK parent.

Meanwhile, the Tories continue to flatline in Scotland as they’ve done for most of a generation, and the Lib Dems suffer the consequences of a massively unpopular Westminster coalition and a third successive leader who seems more consumed by hatred of the SNP than any commitment to seeing his own party’s policies advanced.

So it shouldn’t come as a great surprise to any passing neutral observer that the Scottish opposition has all but given up on any hope of defeating Alex Salmond democratically at the ballot box, and quietly embarked instead on a new strategy: to steal power from the nationalists by bypassing Holyrood altogether.

Read the rest of this entry →

One nation under St George 60

Posted on October 03, 2012 by

We’d be getting a little nervous at the moment if we were citizens of Northern Ireland who wanted to stay part of the United Kingdom. Because over recent weeks and months, the concept of the UK has been increasingly pushed aside, in favour of that of Great Britain. (A construct which, of course, excludes the entire island of Ireland.)

The home team at the London Olympics, lavishly celebrated at the Labour conference yesterday, was branded “Team GB”, rather than “Team UK”, and although there are three devolved administrations and parliaments within the UK, only two of them were featured at the same conference’s “Better Together” session.

The situation in Northern Ireland is none of this site’s concern. But it’s not just the Unionists across the sea who ought to be worried. Because on the strength of what Ed Miliband said in his keynote speech yesterday afternoon, Scotland and Wales face a future of being absorbed, in every practical sense, into a Greater England.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,666 Posts, 1,201,471 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Republicofscotland on How it happened: “We’ll get a glimpse of what direction Trump is taking when this appointment is made. So who will replace that…Nov 7, 18:39
    • Skip_NC on How it happened: “Not only is it hypocritical, but I feel it helped Trump in 2016 and again this week. The constant bashing…Nov 7, 18:29
    • Neil Singleton on How it happened: “Trump met Epstein once and afterwards stated that he wanted nothing to do with him. Epstein invited Trump to his…Nov 7, 18:26
    • Hatey McHateface on How it happened: “Western weaponry has been exposed as obsolete and ineffective… (mostly) Phew, that’s a relief. There will be no threats of…Nov 7, 18:23
    • Campbell Clansman on How it happened: “It was voted on by the Convention of Estates—NOT parliament. The “Conventione” [sic] was not, BTW, an elected body. It’s…Nov 7, 18:18
    • Republicofscotland on How it happened: “The madness continues – the hatred for Trump knows no end – of course like Harris and Biden, Trump is…Nov 7, 18:12
    • Hatey McHateface on How it happened: “a complicit native elite in Scotland, including elected Scottish representatives I’m very happy indeed to concede you have that right,…Nov 7, 18:08
    • Ian Smith on How it happened: “Trump was a Democrat for about three decades before switching. Oprah talked about running on a joint ticket with him…Nov 7, 17:54
    • gregor on How it happened: “Does this look like your granny… Rudy Ayoub: Anthropomorphic Analysis: Plausible Theory (Instrumental): https://tinyurl.com/bdcw2b6nNov 7, 17:50
    • Alf Baird on How it happened: ““The “Claim of Right” was NOT passed by parliament” You mean the Claim of Right ‘Act’ 1689 passed by the…Nov 7, 17:50
    • Alf Baird on How it happened: “Westminster’s power to legislate for Scotland is ‘conditional’: (1) on Scottish representation at Westminster, and; (2) on the requirement for…Nov 7, 17:33
    • sam on How it happened: ““Nah….” I guess you mean most public health researchers. It has been known for centuries that scioeconomic conditions affect healthNov 7, 17:12
    • Robert Matthews on How it happened: “…from your Gallowgate jakey bench.Nov 7, 16:31
    • Hatey McHateface on How it happened: “Look abody, James is using two-syllable words! Bless.Nov 7, 16:22
    • Hatey McHateface on How it happened: “Thanks for your reply. I’ve searched it and can find no references to “neoliberal” or “neoliberalism” – the cause of…Nov 7, 16:17
    • James on How it happened: “Turning a bit like the Daily Heil online here today. The Site Prick will be foaming at the mouth by…Nov 7, 16:13
    • gregor on How it happened: “The Lego Movie: Everything Is AWESOME!!! “Everything is better when we stick together Side by side, you and I are…Nov 7, 16:05
    • James on How it happened: “Elon Musk. Free speech. ROTFLMFAO.Nov 7, 16:03
    • James on How it happened: “Obviously. As always.Nov 7, 16:02
    • James on How it happened: “House!Nov 7, 15:58
    • James on How it happened: “There’s a few appeared out of the woodwork today….Nov 7, 15:56
    • James on How it happened: “Oh C*rist here’s this yin started noo. lolNov 7, 15:48
    • Hatey McHateface on How it happened: “Is that your granny you’re quoting there? Only if it’s somebody with a bit more plausible authority, you need to…Nov 7, 15:45
    • James on How it happened: “You’re no Scots then, eh? What a surprise.Nov 7, 15:44
    • James on How it happened: “Aaaand… Troll 4.Nov 7, 15:43
    • James on How it happened: “Troll 3.Nov 7, 15:43
    • James on How it happened: “And here’s another yin.Nov 7, 15:42
    • James on How it happened: “Troll alert. This bollocks has been debunked on here over and over again. ‘Aidan’ is a Yoon troll. Ignore.Nov 7, 15:41
    • Toby Lerone on Bespoilers Of Graves: “Nice findNov 7, 15:37
    • Chas on How it happened: “So what?Nov 7, 15:37
  • A tall tale



↑ Top