The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



Vote No for [TBC] 36

Posted on January 11, 2013 by

The final aspect of the independence debate touched on by Alistair Darling’s interview on Newsnight Scotland last night brought some more much-needed clarity to the situation. In this segment of the programme the issue being pursued by Gordon Brewer was what the Unionist parties were going to offer the Scottish electorate in the way of greater devolution in the event of a No vote.

Uncharacteristically, Darling was a little evasive when Brewer first raised the issue, but thankfully some hard facts were soon forthcoming.

Read the rest of this entry →

The Fourth Reich? 31

Posted on January 11, 2013 by

While we welcomed the definitive answer on the question of an independent Scotland’s relationship to the United Kingdom, we were a little disturbed by something Alistair Darling said about Europe in his Newsnight Scotland interview last night.

It happened at 13m 42s. See what you think. (Emphasis Darling’s own this time.)

Read the rest of this entry →

One more time for the folks at home 6

Posted on January 11, 2013 by

For goodness’ sake. Despite believing we’d laid the issue to rest once and for all, we’re STILL getting comments and tweets from readers who haven’t grasped Alistair Darling’s simple, straightforward explanation of whether Scotland’s decision in the independence referendum would be irreversible and forever, or whether we would instead quickly and inevitably find ourselves back in the Union.

Since you clearly found our previous quotes from the “Better Together” chairman inexplicably ambiguous, we’ve gone back and found a couple more from the same interview that should DEFINITELY clear things up.

Read the rest of this entry →

The (very) hokey cokey 33

Posted on January 11, 2013 by

Readers might be forgiven for experiencing a sense of deja vu on watching last night's Newsnight Scotland, which featured a rather animated interview with Alistair Darling. Because not for the first time, the No campaign chief seemed to be experiencing a considerable amount of difficulty in getting his story straight.

Let's examine a couple of intriguing snippets.

Read the rest of this entry →

Fancy a chat, Darling? 59

Posted on January 07, 2013 by

The Scotsman’s last attempt at a live webchat didn’t go too well. In fact it didn’t happen at all, and the page has now vanished entirely. So we were pleased to see them having another go today, in the shape of a well-trailed Q&A session with “Better Together” campaign head Alistair Darling. We tuned in to see how it went.

We submitted a question of our own a few hours in advance of the event, on the subject of this. It wasn’t selected. We also made a few comments during the “chat”, but none were printed. Indeed, nothing at all was published which wasn’t a prepared question – there were no apparent responses to anything Darling said, and no discussion at all, just question followed by answer followed by new question.

You can see a full transcript below (verbatim – we haven’t corrected any typos), along with our analysis of Darling’s responses in red. Did he engage in full and informative answers, or did he just dodge his way to the end? See if you can guess.

Read the rest of this entry →

Vote No for prosperity? 25

Posted on December 22, 2012 by

The core claim of the No campaign, or “Better Together” as it prefers to be called, is that Scotland is economically, politically and socially stronger as a partner within the United Kingdom. This status is defined, according to the campaign’s website, by three key factors: Prosperity, Security and Interdependence.

Each deserves scrutiny, but for now let’s focus on the first one, with reference to Alistair Darling’s recent speech at the John P. Mackintosh lecture. This was the claim that Darling made on trade and business:

“Scotland is far better represented abroad as part of the UK than we could ever hope to be as a separate state. The nationalists tell you that the UK embassies and consulates do not represent Scots. Try telling that to Scots who find themselves in trouble in a far-flung part of the world and can rely on the UK embassy to help them out. To the businesses seeking trade. They open doors for our people and businesses across the globe.

Farmers, fishermen and women, businesses big and small all reap the benefits of the UK’s global reach and global influence. Losing this influence would be a massive loss. It would be impossible to replicate it on a smaller scale.”

I’ve worked in 27 countries around the world in all six inhabited continents, so I think it’s fair to call myself a global businessman. I’m operating in a medium-sized company, but in 11 years of travel I cannot bring to mind a single case where association with Britain has differentiated our business.

Read the rest of this entry →

Captain Darling sounds a retreat 38

Posted on November 10, 2012 by

It can be a full-time job keeping up with the many inconsistencies and contradictions in the anti-independence campaign. (Labour’s professed hatred for the Tories but willingness to let them govern Scotland when Scottish voters reject them, and the Conservatives’ belief in the UK Union but deep-seated antipathy to the European one, leap out as two of the more obvious examples.) Today’s is a corker, though.

Attentive readers will recall that the “Better Together” camp has spent the five months since its launch constantly warning Scots that independence would be “irrevocable”. Here’s figurehead Alistair Darling being reported in the Telegraph as saying just that at the No campaign’s launch in June of this year (our emphasis, as usual):

“This is not about picking a government for the next five years. If we decide to go down the independence route it is an irrevocable step – you’re talking about a completely different constitutional relationship, maybe for the next 200 or 300 years.”

Pretty unequivocal, then – independence is forever, no going back in our lifetime, or that of our children, or their children, or their children. But wait. Fast-forward to last night and the former Chancellor appears to have had a radical change of heart, in a BBC story headlined “Darling predicts independent Scotland would rejoin UK”:

“Speaking as he delivered this year’s John P Mackintosh Memorial Lecture in Prestonpans, East Lothian, on Friday evening, [Darling] said the ‘most obvious problem’ with a common currency was that ‘sooner or later it takes you to economic and then political union. So Scotland would leave the UK only to end up in the same place as it began, with all the trauma that would entail.'”

Of course, if you’re a Wings Over Scotland reader you already knew the “irrevocable” line was a load of rubbish that could only be true if the core claim – and indeed, the very name – of “Better Together” was a cynical lie. But it’s nice to see Mr Darling admit it this early in the day. Which strident assertion, we wonder, will he recant next?

The point of no return? 94

Posted on October 18, 2012 by

Something’s been puzzling us for a while now, readers. We’ve been a bit reluctant to mention it before because it’s the sort of thing people can spin in misleading ways, and because it’s something we neither want to see happen or believe ever would. But purely by way of an intellectual exercise, let’s ask the question.

Ever since being unveiled as the figurehead of the anti-independence campaign, Alistair Darling has insisted that a Yes vote in 2014 would be “irrevocable”. It’s a word that crops up frequently from the No camp, in what appears to be a strange and misconceived extension of the standard-issue fearmongering approach which has characterised most Unionist campaigning to date.

(Because we very much doubt that even one person who votes for independence will be doing so with the thought “Och, if it doesn’t work out we’ll just rejoin the UK”.)

Nevertheless, if we’re really “better together”, why would it be impossible to go back?

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,802 Posts, 1,224,057 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • agent x on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Harold Wilson (Labour) closed 253 pits as against Margaret Thatcher (Conservative) 115, more than twice as many. However because there…Aug 13, 23:08
    • Lorn on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “When I said New Labour were Tories by any other name, that is what they were but in a mirror…Aug 13, 23:02
    • Alf Baird on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: ““UNIONISM is more than political, it is an exceptionalist worldview, more gut instinct than brain.” Yes, that might also be…Aug 13, 21:51
    • GM on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Ted Heath?Aug 13, 21:13
    • Hatey McHateface on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: ““the chances of England succumbing to a tyrannical dictatorship are virtually nil” They may not yet be high, but to…Aug 13, 20:56
    • agent x on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: ““Nicola Sturgeon knew she would lose independence court case – but still spent £250k of public cash on proving this”…Aug 13, 20:50
    • Hatey McHateface on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “French is the language of diplomacy – the Lingua Franca in fact. The reason is that it permits ideas to…Aug 13, 20:45
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Spot on Sally for the first 3 paras. Personally, I don’t believe a word of her PERSONAL account. She’s a…Aug 13, 20:41
    • Southernbystander on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “I have lived here all my life and I can tell you England is not collapsing. Of course I understand…Aug 13, 20:35
    • Hatey McHateface on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “@ James says: 13 August, 2025 at 6:42 pm You’ll need both hands free to check this out, but the…Aug 13, 20:35
    • Southernbystander on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “I can assure you the chances of England succumbing to a tyrannical dictatorship are virtually nil. Where do you get…Aug 13, 20:31
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Dan says: 13 August, 2025 at 7:44 pm Hmm, as stated several times already, I’m fairly sure that’s a different…Aug 13, 20:28
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Dan says: 13 August, 2025 at 7:44 pm Hmm, as stated several times already, I’m fairly sure that’s a different…Aug 13, 20:27
    • Southernbystander on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “I think Beckett wrote most if his work in French, then translated it into English. I think he liked to…Aug 13, 20:27
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Hatey McHateface says: 12 August, 2025 at 10:38 pm Perhaps more true to the actual, lived reality: Frankly, My Queer,…Aug 13, 20:23
    • Dan on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Hmm, as stated several times already, I’m fairly sure that’s a different Liz Lloyd. https://archive.is/RaImGAug 13, 19:44
    • Andy Wiltshire on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Perhaps the little blue men who live in Fearghas’ radiator all speak French.Aug 13, 19:31
    • George Ferguson on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “@Dan Thank you for enquiry previously into my health. I am doing great, a brilliant operation done by the SNHS.…Aug 13, 19:31
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Indeed. LL working for Starmer? I didn’t know that. Makes sense. She’s a good fit.Aug 13, 19:17
    • TURABDIN on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “should have read…BESIDES it is for Scotland to reclaim her sovereignty rather than for England to relinquish it, however unwillingly.Aug 13, 19:15
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “All of it. She’s a barrel scraper extraordinaire.Aug 13, 19:13
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Interesting. I don’t think they are yet divorced, but I can guarantee you they WILL be, with plenty of time…Aug 13, 19:12
    • agent x on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Was there a reason to give a French translation as opposed to Mandarin Chinese, Swahili or evens Scots?Aug 13, 19:08
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Indeed. And government disrupting society, in this way, can in some instances be called treason.Aug 13, 19:08
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “That’s it. From now on it shall be called ‘The Book of Lies’. No more apt a description yet exists.Aug 13, 19:03
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “There’s no stopping the Great Replacement. Yet 🙂Aug 13, 18:58
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Straight answers . . . you only get a straight answer from a narcissist when it’s a categorical denial of…Aug 13, 18:53
    • James on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “#SitePrick1 wrang – yet again. Ever heard of EFTA, ya dumb bastard?Aug 13, 18:42
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Frank, you’re not the only one. I feel the same way too.Aug 13, 18:37
    • Nae Need! on The Endless Evil Of Everyone Else: “Indeed. DEI is dangerous stuff.Aug 13, 18:33
  • A tall tale



↑ Top