The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The lockout

Posted on May 12, 2015 by

There was an interesting line in The National yesterday:

“The monthly Scottish Questions in Parliament looks set to be an odd affair.

Under the current system the Secretary of State for Scotland will answer six questions from the Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland, while 56 SNP MPs watch on from the back benches and are allowed to ask one question.”

In other words, business as usual.

Both the new Scottish Secretary, David Mundell, and his new shadow, Labour’s Ian Murray, were interviewed on today’s Good Morning Scotland. Mundell ruled out full fiscal autonomy, and indeed any suggestion that the SNP landslide had represented an expression by Scottish voters of a desire for more in the way of devolution than the feeble Smith Commission proposals.

Murray, meanwhile, stated his intent as being to oppose both the Tories and the SNP, refusing several times when asked to say that he’d work constructively with the MPs holding 95% of Scottish seats. (Indeed, despite reiterating his own opposition to the renewal of Trident, he wouldn’t say whether he’d actually vote against it.)

So Scotland knows where it stands. Two MPs from parties with just 3% of Scottish seats between them both plan to spend their time blocking the aims of a party with 95% of seats. Indeed, that party will barely even be allowed to be heard in the single brief Parliamentary session devoted to Scottish matters each month.

To onlookers, it seems that Scottish Questions will continue much the same as it did for the last five years – Labour setting up softball anti-SNP questions to give the Tories a chance to bash the Nats while both parties’ MPs sit on the government and opposition benches hooting and jeering in open contempt.

(Or simply drowning out the debate entirely with disrespectful chatter as they wait for the much more important business of Prime Minister’s Questions which follows it.)

The policies Scotland voted overwhelmingly for, in other words, will be sidelined and blocked by two parties who were both humiliated last Thursday with their lowest vote shares of all time, teaming up against the party which secured 120,000 more votes from Scots than any party has ever done at any election in history.

Are you feeling the love yet, readers?

4 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 14 05 15 18:49

    Westminster – Reform SNP voice distribution of new MP’s from Scotland | ShaunyNews - You are here now, why not comment?

  2. 14 05 15 18:52

    Ace Breaking News | Westminster – Reform SNP voice distribution of new MP’s from Scotland

507 to “The lockout”

  1. Rock says:

    Paula Rose,

    “@ Rock – do you have a problem with democracy?”

    Paula, “honey”, “dear”, do you believe that a Westminster election where millions of votes are wasted votes is an exercise in democracy?

    Reply
  2. Paula Rose says:

    I was referring to the democratic structure of the SNP and the Green Party – neither are top down, leader-knows-best systems.

    The FPTP voting system used for UK general elections is profoundly undemocratic and needs reform, something that the majority of parties that stood would agree on, but unfortunately the biggest two do not.

    Reply
  3. Rock says:

    Paula Rose,

    “The FPTP voting system used for UK general elections is profoundly undemocratic and needs reform, something that the majority of parties that stood would agree on, but unfortunately the biggest two do not.”

    Paula, “honey”, “dear”, surprise, surprise, we are of the same view on that.

    But that doesn’t make me any less angry about Patrick Harvie and the Scottish Green leadership for acting as spoilsports in the Westminster election.

    Patrick Harvie is a known SNP and Alex Salmond hater who didn’t miss any opportunity to criticise them during the referendum campaign.

    I wonder how Greens like yourself could be happy celebrating the SNP victory while posting on this site when your leaders’ stance could have easily hindered more than the one they almost certainly did.

    Reply
  4. Fred says:

    Hate disagreeing with Paula but Rock’s right about Clatty Pat, I’m as green as the next man but support for independence comes first and always.
    He didn’t like Salmond possibly because Salmond didn’t abide fools gladly and the business about appearing at Holyrood looking like Stig of the Dump is pathetic.

    Reply
  5. Morag says:

    I think Patrick’s nose is still out of joint over not being in coalition in 2011, and possibly being Deputy First Minister. This was after all widely predicted and I think even the SNP were anticipating it – possibly even hoping for it, not believing they could get an overall majority on their own.

    When the SNP got 69 seats, leaving no necessity for a coalition partner, he was reportedly quite disappointed. Especially as his party got far fewer seats than anticipated.

    Reply
  6. Paula Rose says:

    Patrick Harvie is not the Green Party folks, I thought I’d explained it all – but never mind I’m not going to dwell on this.

    Reply
  7. MrObycyek says:

    I am a bit disappointed that a previous post I made was not shown. In it, although it was off topic slighty, I attempted to answer Dr Ew in regards to his question to Brian Powell about JFK and Scotland.
    I have read the rules of this site but am not quite sure why it was not shown.

    Also, in The National on Tuesday it mentioned that the leaked memo inquiry is still ongoing according to official sources. Deary me. If as it has previously been stated the leak was from one individual and that individual is known to the powers that be then why is it taking so long to get the information out to people? This whole sorry episode stinks worse than my toilet after curry night, and that is honking I can tell you!

    Reply
  8. Rock says:

    Fred,

    “Hate disagreeing with Paula but Rock’s right about Clatty Pat”

    Morag,

    “I think Patrick’s nose is still out of joint over not being in coalition in 2011, and possibly being Deputy First Minister.”

    That is exactly what I have been pointing out but have been accused my many here of causing division and being a troll.

    If we want independence, the bitter truth will have to be expressed.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,869 Posts, 1,234,700 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Lorna Campbell on Yelling at the tide: “No legislation in existence, in Scotland or the UK, gives any man the right to enter female spaces, even where…Jan 21, 16:31
    • Northcode on Yelling at the tide: “And you, Father, are a total embarrassment… period. Not least because of your over-reliance on the exclamation mark and the…Jan 21, 16:00
    • Northcode on Yelling at the tide: ““Give up son…” No, Father… I will never give up, I will never surrender. And know this, oh giver of…Jan 21, 15:52
    • holymacmoses on Yelling at the tide: “Perfect:-)Jan 21, 15:34
    • Insider on Yelling at the tide: “Christ ! What an utter clown you are “Northcode” Give up son ! You’re a total embarrassment to the Indy…Jan 21, 15:15
    • Northcode on Yelling at the tide: “Here’s anither yin taken fae the online “Dictionars o the Scots Leid”: SIN, adv., prep., conj. Also syn, sen, san(e),…Jan 21, 14:58
    • Alf Baird on Yelling at the tide: ““the Scottish Legal System operates in a context free vacuum” The basic principle of any colonial justice system is that…Jan 21, 14:51
    • lothianlad on Yelling at the tide: “stick with it warrior Stu! Thank you for all you do for truth and justiceJan 21, 14:49
    • Northcode on Yelling at the tide: “” We knew you would not disappoint us…” I wonder who the “we” and “us” are. Must be aw its…Jan 21, 14:32
    • Andy Wiltshire on Yelling at the tide: “In reply to your letter, we undertake to give a response immediately after the conclusion of Operation Branchform.Jan 21, 14:16
    • sarah on Yelling at the tide: “The plot thickens. Very well done, Rev, and thank you once again for trying, directly, to improve public standards in…Jan 21, 13:53
    • Ian Smith on Yelling at the tide: “Bear in mind that AI can be prompted to agree with the type of query it is presented with. If…Jan 21, 13:50
    • sam on Yelling at the tide: ““I would bet money that is at the heart of the Kemp fiasco.” Me,too. And “correspondence”? What part did this…Jan 21, 13:35
    • Northcode on Yelling at the tide: “God Almighty the colonialists on here are thick. And their reading comprehension of the English language appears to be wanting,…Jan 21, 13:26
    • Cynicus on Yelling at the tide: ““If you are satisfied that Judge Kemp did not derive them from generative AI, are you equally satisfied that the…Jan 21, 13:12
    • sam on Yelling at the tide: “Scrutiny of the tribunal findings from Genspect. “The Tribunal maintains on the one hand that “having the protected characteristic of…Jan 21, 13:10
    • Confused on The Secondhand Amendment: “let’s remember the facts of our own situation; historical interlude … the union, when you look into what happened, is…Jan 21, 13:00
    • Ian Smith on Yelling at the tide: “Surely Judge Kemp must have read these landmark rulings by himself and noticed that his judicial colleague was talking nonsense.…Jan 21, 12:57
    • Confused on The Secondhand Amendment: “no iranian cleric ever stole your country’s oil, resources, made you second class citizens/white n1ggers, spilled your blood for nothing,…Jan 21, 12:57
    • Confused on The Secondhand Amendment: “it’s called the speculative society and its a drop your keks, grab your ankles and bite down on this ……Jan 21, 12:56
    • Northcode on Yelling at the tide: “sin [s?n, s?n] adv. Since, ago, from now, from that time. prep. Since, from the time of, after. conj. Since,…Jan 21, 12:43
    • sam on Yelling at the tide: “I think it likely that the matter of correspondence with a judicial colleague will be raised in the EAT to…Jan 21, 12:43
    • Dave Hansell on Yelling at the tide: “Sadly, for the poster known as Northcode, an award claimed immediately by a post which implies, if not effectively argues,…Jan 21, 12:30
    • Hatey McHateface on Yelling at the tide: “Sure about that, Alf? My innate knowledge of Scots, backed up by a check in the Scots dictionary, shows “sin”…Jan 21, 12:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Yelling at the tide: “Given that Shona is to be replaced by Susan, it would be interesting if some forensic journalist were to dig…Jan 21, 12:05
    • Lorna Campbell on Yelling at the tide: “Strangely enough, for a nationalist, and a Scottish nationalist at that (though not SNP) I do not believe that this…Jan 21, 12:04
    • Lord_Humblecroft on Yelling at the tide: “Stu, The judicial colleagues are in all likelihood the lay members of the tribunal: Court docs show: Employment Judge A…Jan 21, 11:54
    • jim Thomson on Yelling at the tide: “I gave up holding my breath for such results a long time ago. The Establishment will, undoubtedly, close ranks again…Jan 21, 11:52
    • James Cheyne on The Secondhand Amendment: “Sam, Indeed this did go on, if the pay was right and rewards of land or titles could be Acquired…Jan 21, 11:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Yelling at the tide: “Wow, Northy, Off Topic by comment # 11. Surely a new Wings BTL record. As for self-identifying as shit, that’s…Jan 21, 11:47
  • A tall tale



↑ Top