The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Our friends, in the South

Posted on February 23, 2012 by

It’s tempting to be taken in by the performances of Westminster politicians when they come to Scotland. David Cameron was full of self-effacement and humility in Edinburgh last week, and Michael Moore talks in soft and moderate tones of seeking only to “help” the Scottish Government whenever he speaks to the Scottish media. But if you want to see how our partners in the Union REALLY feel about us, it’s best to watch how they behave when they’re safely back at home.

The contempt for Scotland, and the Scottish Government in particular, just leaps off the screen. The Secretary of State for Scotland is supposed to be Scotland’s man in the government, not the government’s man in Scotland. It’s a post that the Lib Dems said they would abolish altogether in their 2010 manifesto (which is doubtless why in 2012 the job is not only still in existence under the coalition, but occupied by a Lib Dem). And it’s supposed to be a representative figurehead through which the opposition can challenge the UK government’s policies relating to Scotland.

But in the entire half-hour, only one notable question is actually directed by Labour (in the shape of Margaret Curran, who must have been ill) to Moore about his own administration’s conduct. Rather, the rest of the time he’s invited by members of Labour, the Lib Dems and the Tories to offer his opinion (which invariably concurs with theirs) on the actions of another body, which is not permitted any opportunity to answer back. The proceedings can be accurately summarised thusly:

RANDOM MP, ANY SIDE: “Does the Secretary of State agree that the SNP are simply ghastly, and that they smell and all their mums are ugly?”

SECRETARY OF STATE: “Yes. Yes I do. But the Honourable Member should rest assured that this government is doing everything in its power to put the jumped-up little Scotch oiks in their place.”

(Repeat ad infinitum.)

The sheer disrespect in which Scotland is held by the Commons is demonstrated by the constant hubbub of noise over which some questioners fight to be heard, and which the Speaker repeatedly but ineffectually attempts to silence. The volume of contempt rises significantly if any SNP member rises from their seat to speak, only to be all but drowned in jeering, catcalling and hooting from all sides of the House.

When you’re implored over the coming years to remain in our “shared home“, never forget what our position in that home is. We’re not the husband or the wife, nor even a slightly sulky teenager or a new-born and wanted child. We’re the dog. And a dog that keeps making a mess on the carpet, at that. Vote No in 2014  and we’ll have our faces rubbed in it for a generation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Morag

Honestly, I know a lot of very well-cared-for and indeed pampered dogs.  Dogs whose owners are so fond of them, they care for the dog's welfare above their own.
 
You must know some very abusive dog owners.  Maybe I could give you the email address of the SSPCA?  I have to say I'm struggling to think of a normal family analogy for what is going on.  The only really analagous relationships (including the canine kind) are abusive ones.

Morag

Well, when you put it that way….

Alex Grant

Exactly my thoughts Stu.If you could ensure the `"Scottish voter" were presented with a sample of this performance we would win the referendum hands down. And if the boot were on the other foot and Holyrood treated the English in this fashion the BBC would be presenting it ad nauseum! And as you say if we vote No the above performance will look polite.! If only the MSM were honest!

Morag

I could only watch about the first minute.  An English MP suggesting that the national debt should be shared out according to the Barnet formula.
Now I don't know if that is even a feasibile proposition, but it clearly wasn't a serious one.  It was nothing but point-scoring.  Moore answers that he doesn't think Scotland will become independent anyway.  "Stronger together weaker apart."  (He'll bring in "hard-working families" any minute now.)  Then he seemed to be drawing breath to give vent to some argument suggesting that he will be bang alongside Westminster in loading as much debt on to his own country as possible – I don't know, I turned off then.
It's bananas.  There's only one answer to that, and that is that the apportioning of assets and liabilities will be a matter for negotiation, which will undoubtedly be fairly complex, and not amenable to sound-bites in the Commons.  Is Moore going to say that?  Of course not.  The whole thing is a waste of time they could all be using to play "Angry Birds" or something.

Morag

Bercow's pic, at the top of the article.
 
He stood as the Conservative candidate for Motherwell in 1987 (I think), and published a leaflet declaring "Ravenscraig is now profitable and its future is safe in our hands".  I remember sending it to the Herald when the Tories closed Ravenscraig in 1992.  It was published in Tom Shields Diary.
 
I only realised it was the same guy because the Herald dredged the thing up out of their files and remarked on it when he became Speaker.

Jeff

link to youtube.com

Full video here

Siôn Eurfyl Jones

Morag, I am ashamed to say that the little shitt suggesting the debt shoul be subject to the Barnett formula was Alun Cairns, a Welsh Tory (very rare species).

Longshanker

"The sheer disrespect in which Scotland is held by the Commons is demonstrated by the constant hubbub of noise."
 
Sorry RevStu, but you sound like a wee angry man with a chip on both shoulders. It seemed like fairly standard Commons fair to me. Especially when you consider that the chamber was filling up for what appeared to be PMQ.
 
Part of the speaker's remit when 'Gorbals Mick' was ousted was to stop this type of behaviour in the Commons. So, getting all hot and bothered, just because it's Scottish Questions and the mythical "us" that were involved, is at best thin skinned and at worst paranoid ignorance.
 
"We’re the dog."
 
You can only feel like that if you grant your consent.
 
"Vote No in 2014 and we’ll have our faces rubbed in it for a generation."
 
I remember a No vote which resulted in our faces being rubbed in it for 18 years. Go figure.

Longshanker

I know you wouldn't stop my comments, so any reason why my comment on this piece isn't getting through?

Morag

Longshanker. several of us have experienced problems getting comments through on other posts.  It may be an over-sensitive spam filter.  Try typing something short and new, without using the cut-and-paste function.

Longshanker

Thanks Morag
First attempt failed
Trying again

Longshanker

Not just cut and paste
Appears to be double carriage return as well
 

charlie

Any news on why the ‘MP for Farrkirk’ aff the news got barred from parliament? I would have thought Labour wid gain support from drappin the heid on tory cunts. Has either of the Millibads ever smacked anyone or told Cameron tfo?

Politics ignores the working class and assummes we’re all stupid and behave like sheep

whatever

Shodan

The Westminster club have always shown contempt for their Scottish colony. There have been far too many examples of this behaviour and worse. It's another nail in the coffin and another good reason for divorce. This marriage has long been an abusive and unhealthy one. Divorce ASAP is the only sensible route.

Morag

Longshanker, what actual "no" vote was that, would you care to explain?  It woudln't be the referendum where 51.6% voted "yes", would it?

Longshanker

Morag
I'm being flippant and facetious of course, but the reference is to the No confidence vote of 79.
Boring I know, but nevertheless an unignorable part of Nat heritage.

Morag

Who's ignoring it?  History is always interesting.

Longshanker

1) Check your definition of flippant and facetious.  
2) Check the context regarding the language used.
3) Add lack of nous regarding humour to your readiily apparent lack of nous regarding irony.
4) Replace snide with 'mildly mocking'.
5) Reappraise 'semantic nit picking' as your game. Your reply, ironically, confirms it.
6) Get over yourself. Being right all the time is a pathology which severely diminishes your credibility. You should reappraise your attitude – you do, after all, have a talent and voice worthy of consideration.
Regardless of the above, you have much more form than me at 'semantic nit picking' and you don't need to be an 'ace investigative journalist' to uncover the evidence which backs up the assertion.

Erchie

Yeah RevStu!

I mean, Longshanker is wrong all of the time and he has MUCH more Credibility than you!

MajorBloodnok

….anyhoo…  Michael Moore … wouldn't or couldn't answer the question?  What are they up to?  Why do they think they can get away with it? And OMG, the sheer impertinence of the SNP asking him to explain what the UK Government actually had in mind (apart from empty soundbites for the benefit of a compliant press).

douglas clark

I think RevStu runs an interesting site Longshanker.
Do you, Longshanker,  run an interesting site?
Just asking
 
 

Longshanker

 
I think RevStu runs an interesting site Longshanker.
Read the second half of no.6 in my post above.
Do you, Longshanker, run an interesting site?
You're going to have let me know the point you're trying to make with the question. I think I know where you're going, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Spell it out for me.
 
 

douglas clark

Longshanker,
I did try to do this sort of thing myself about  year ago. It didn't work out for numerous reasons. I went back to being a reader and occasional commentator.
There are quite a number of web sites that I read fairly regularily. This one is a new addition to my daily read. I was surprised that you chose to say this:
<blockquote>Sorry RevStu, but you sound like a wee angry man with a chip on both shoulders.</blockquote> That was not the general impression that I got from my reading of the site.
As I said, I think it raises useful points, etc. Perhaps you too have a web site that I could read and decide whether or not it is my cup of tea?
Or perhaps not.
 

Longshanker

"This one is a new addition to my daily read. I was surprised that you chose to say this:"
If you're in tune or agree with RevStu, douglas, on any of his points, his writing style is powerful and convincing – even when some of his posts are as insipid and dull as the 'honey dripping beehive'.
Disagree with him however and you see a different kind of creature that does no-one, especially himself, any favours.
This post by RevStu is petty parochialism at its worst. The yah boo of neddy 'Wee Scotlander' divisiveness. I think the online referendum/independence debate can do without this kind of nonsense. Anyone familiar with televised Commons debates ought to have had the nous to realise that Scottish Questions was pretty tame by normal Commons standards.
Strangely enough douglas, RevStu, has inspired me to put a blog together. But it wont be able to match his for scope and depth – he plainly has a lot more time on his hands than I have.
Once I hit the fifth blog post I'll ask RevStu for permission to post a link here. Don't expect too much in the way of Independence opinion though, I really am at a loss regarding which way to vote when the referendum comes.

douglas clark

Longshanker,
 
I'll look out for it!

Longshanker

Cheers douglas
RevStu said:
"You wilfully miss the point"
Not at all. I've seen all sides of the house attacking the SNP and the Liberals on separate occasions. This didn't look or feel any different. Granted, it was unusual to see Labour, Tories and Liberals jeering from the same hymnbook over such a sustained period. But, correct me if I'm wrong, I took your point to be that Scotland, the Scottish Government and the mythical "us" were being treated with contempt during this debate
.
As it's you who decides who the mythical "us" are, it can be discounted as irrelevant.
 
Of course the Commons, in general, has contempt for the Scottish Government in the context of Independence/referendums. But, correct me if I'm wrong, there were at least three SNP MPs in the House. They're big boys with thick skins and I thought Mike Weir conducted himself more than competently.
 
As for Scotland being treated with contempt – ?????. I didn't see anything different from standard Commons fare other than it being a bit tamer than normal. To take offense citing it as contempt against Scotland is nothing less than faux offense. My reading of Scottish Questions in this example was that the Big Bad Unionists are running scared. Why else would they appear so united and play the "does the minister agree with me" game?
 
Oh! And third parties who can't reply being attacked in the house is fairly regular practice – take the European Parliament for example.

Kenny Campbell

What could be more petty and parochial than posting on a site dedicated to Scottish politics as Longshanker….By all means take the high ground and to some extent I agree on the general rabble on the commons. However  please don't pretend you are just on here to ensure fair play….

Longshanker

@kenny campbell
"What could be more petty and parochial than posting on a site dedicated to Scottish politics as Longshanker…"
Ah. I see. Argumentum ad hominem. Sorry Kenny, I don't recognise the validity of your point – explain please.
However please don't pretend you are just on here to ensure fair play…
I've only every offered my opinion – no pretense involved.

Longshanker

 

"You might be mythical, but I'm pretty sure I'm not."
Yet, depressingly, your willfuly obtuse obfuscation does kinda prove your predictability – if nothing else.
And there's nothing faux about my offense.
You're ludicrously easily offended then. You need to be thick skinned for political commentary. Consider withdrawing to protect your thin skin.
When did all three main parties ever devote an entire parliamentary session to mocking and attacking the European Parliament?
Where did I say that an entire parliamentary session was devoted to it?
 

Shodan

Same pattern every time with these trolls. Nothing good comes of them. Still, RevStu has had better ones than this. I wonder how many of them are the same one or two crackpots as I know he's had some really strange or unstable ones stalking him for long periods at times and inventing all manner of weird ways to pester him.

Longshanker

@shodan
Same pattern every time with these trolls.
Sweeping generalisations now – bless.
 
Nothing good comes of them.
So, nothing good comes from providing an alternative opinion? I thought that was what democracy and online debate was about.
 
I wonder how many of them are the same one or two crackpots as I know he's had some really strange or unstable ones stalking him for long periods at times and inventing all manner of weird ways to pester him.
 
I assume you're talking about yourself here. I fail to see any reasonable justification for its inclusion otherways.
At best it makes you sound like a dribbling sycophant, at worst a posturing catamite.
If you want to diminish someone's opinion or argument don't indulge in stupid name calling coupled to fantasy scenarios. You only fulfil the stereotype of an intolerant cybernat.
 

Longshanker

"Where did I say that an entire parliamentary session was devoted to it?"
Then it's not the same thing, is it?
 
By your own admission, the entire session of Scottish Questions wasn't devoted to attacking and mocking the Scottish Parliament either. Margaret Curran had a go at the coalition administration – as mentioned in your body copy – and I distinctly remember at least 3 SNP MPs having their say. So the point of your question is?

Longshanker

 "Does the fact that 24 minutes rather than the full 26 (or whatever) were spent attacking the SNP change the underlying point one iota?"
Apology accepted. Not so hard really – is it?

Siôn Eurfyl Jones

I know it is dangorous to intervene on family arguments, but can I point out  to lonshanker that he has not contributed anything of any iterest or value to this thread? 

Longshanker

Siôn Eurfyl Jones
 
Can I point out that three spelling mishtakes in one rambling sentence contributes even less.

 


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,655 Posts, 1,198,631 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • George Ferguson on Two Spaces: “In my region I pay 62.02 standing charge versus 38.05 in London. Explain? An Ofgem ruling. Connection charges for renewable…Oct 11, 21:43
    • George Ferguson on Two Spaces: “https://metro.co.uk/2024/03/13/uk-really-risk-power-blackouts-everything-know-20449855/#:~:text=Last%20month%2C%20there%20were%20also,a%20worst%2Dcase%20scenario’. 2024 Energy Secretary wanting to build new gas fired power stations to prevent blackoutsOct 11, 21:19
    • Robert Louis on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “So the first pic, Sturgeon and her coven,discussing how to make a career from doing nothing. Mibbes pretendy ‘professor’ Kezia…Oct 11, 21:05
    • George Ferguson on Two Spaces: “https://www.cityam.com/revealed-brits-are-paying-the-highest-electricity-bills-in-the-entire-world/ Depends on your sourceOct 11, 21:05
    • 100%Yes on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “it wasn’t a gathering for MEN.Oct 11, 21:05
    • 100%Yes on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “I take it Sturgeon got the good news she was hoping for.Oct 11, 21:03
    • 100%Yes on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Peter’s at home washing the dishes and doing the ironing it takes his mind of other matters whiles Mrs Murrell…Oct 11, 20:54
    • Geri on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “NI is power share – they can’t invite one without the other or there’d be a war lol This facade…Oct 11, 20:52
    • Young Lochinvar on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Meant to say; assuming this coven took place in the house of SHE who shall not be named (and whose…Oct 11, 20:49
    • 100%Yes on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Was Indy ever on the table?Oct 11, 20:49
    • Muscleguy on Two Spaces: “It hinges on whether Murrell is guilty. If he is so proven then attention falls on the other two who…Oct 11, 20:46
    • Dan on Two Spaces: “Was doing a bit of reading on maintaining Grid Inertia / Frequency, and the issues with increasing amounts of asynchronous…Oct 11, 20:34
    • Southernbystander on Two Spaces: “British energy is indeed expensive but in fact Denmark and Germany have higher electricity prices than GB in Europe in…Oct 11, 20:27
    • Young Lochinvar on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “So.. Andy Burnham has achieved his mid term aim: on a parity with countries FMs. He’ll be even more insufferable…Oct 11, 20:22
    • Geri on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “They’re pissed at the UKs complicit actions in Palestine & blocking security council resolutions.. They’ve also joined BRICS. UAE sells…Oct 11, 20:18
    • Mia on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Was Sue Gray even in Scotland? I am wondering if that new “role” of hers is just an excuse for…Oct 11, 20:17
    • Mia on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Representation of Scotland in England-as-the-UK parliament: 8.8% Representation of Scotland in Sir Kid and Elderly Starver’s council of nonsense: 5.6%…Oct 11, 20:12
    • Ian McCubbin on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “The word Quisling should be in not quizmasterOct 11, 19:52
    • Ian McCubbin on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Starmer left with a police and MI5 escort. Guess he was so concerned about independistas and Pro Palistine protectors that…Oct 11, 19:51
    • Robert Hughes on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Fckn revolting , the lot of them . Useless , self-satisfied , clueless-about-everything , other than their own fantasy self-image…Oct 11, 19:45
    • Dave Llewellyn on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “And somewhere in front of Colonial House came the call. Starmers envoys MI5 MI5 MI5 Starmers envoys MI5 And likely…Oct 11, 19:43
    • Ted on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “What it shows is how unserious Gray is unless it’s to negotiate her inflated settlement.Oct 11, 19:31
    • Willie on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “If I may change the topic from the witches convention and the bewitched John Swinney has anyone picked up on…Oct 11, 19:21
    • Geri on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “1. Jakeys discussing how to be loser over Lidls special buy. 2. Lidls special buy gate crashing an English do.…Oct 11, 19:18
    • Confused on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “And relegating your country’s status to some approximation of an english borough … Some nationalists would see Scotland on the…Oct 11, 19:11
    • Confused on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Worst. Mature. Lesbian. Porno. Ever.Oct 11, 19:06
    • Callum on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Two vomiting inducing pics which reveals that Scotland is truly fecked.Oct 11, 18:58
    • Republicofscotland on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “Council of Nations and Regions – an idea by House Jock Gordon Brown – is just another layer of colonialism…Oct 11, 18:48
    • Willie on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “First picture some might describe as what used to be called dykes. The second listing certainly exposes Swinney as someone…Oct 11, 18:46
    • Tinto Chiel on The King And Queen Of Cringe: “The mindless, adolescent Selfie Generation strikes again. Pic 1: Go Taylor, go! and other Grate Thotts. Pic 2: Scotland’s real…Oct 11, 18:37
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
78
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x