The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Archive for the ‘analysis’


An abuse of trust 102

Posted on December 09, 2015 by

We’ve been having some trouble trying to explain the Alistair Carmichael verdict to some English chums who hadn’t been following the case previously and have now just heard about it on the news.

Lord Matthews and Lady Paton in their great wisdom concluded that Carmichael had lied about the “Frenchgate” memo, and that he had also lied to them in the courtroom, and that the first of those lies was intended to help Carmichael achieve re-election, but that somehow his own re-election was not a “personal” matter.

acwhoops

Our friends couldn’t follow the logic of that, and to be honest we weren’t able to help them much. Nevertheless, the judgement has been handed down and the case is closed. It seems unlikely the petitioners could fund an appeal even if one was to be allowed, particularly given that according to press reports Carmichael will be pursuing them for his £150,000 costs as well as their own.

However, in the process of wriggling out of his lie on an obscure legal and semantic technicality, Carmichael appears, so far as we can tell, to have explicitly implicated himself in a far more serious crime.

Read the rest of this entry →

Running on empty 154

Posted on December 08, 2015 by

The National today has a story we’ve been sitting on for several days while we tried to get some verifiable evidence in the form of links or screenshots to back it up.

juneneilson

But Labour aren’t the only people having trouble scaring up a candidate roster.

Read the rest of this entry →

The monstrous detriment of women 265

Posted on November 29, 2015 by

We were considering having a day off today, readers. There’s absolutely nothing of any note happening in Scottish politics, and the papers have been reduced to scraping up all manner of barely-reheated leftover dregs to fill their pages.

But then someone drew our attention to something in Scotland On Sunday about the ongoing Women For Independence fiasco, and we were too annoyed to let it lie.

sosowfi

Read the rest of this entry →

The conjurer’s assistants 155

Posted on November 26, 2015 by

Yesterday George Osborne treated us to an Autumn Statement in which he performed one of the most remarkable political U-turns in living memory.

The apparent need to cut £12bn from the welfare budget has long been sign-posted by the Tories as a requirement to getting us “back in the black” and on the road to a “higher wage, lower welfare, lower tax” society as part of their oft-cited “long-term economic plan”. (Or what academic economists prefer to call a risky experiment with the economy in order to score political points.)

Alert readers will recall David Cameron saying before the general election that child tax credits wouldn’t be cut in pursuit of that goal. But after the election, Osborne decided that they would. The Institute for Fiscal Studies determined that these cuts would have the worst effects on some of the poorest families in Britain.

p1

Despite widespread opposition to the cuts, Labour infamously abstained on the critical vote in the Commons. Then, when the welfare bill reached the Lords, Labour once again abstained on a Lib Dem motion that would have completely killed the bill, in favour of a Labour one which phased in the cuts over three years, but meant Osborne would have to find another £4.5bn in his budget.

The passing of the Labour motion enraged Cameron so much that he went on an extraordinary rant about a “constitutional crisis” and announced a “rapid review”.

So we were somewhat surprised to hear Osborne say yesterday that the best thing to do was “not to phase these changes in, but to avoid them altogether”.

Read the rest of this entry →

Daily Record Maths For Beginners 364

Posted on November 25, 2015 by

We tweeted this yesterday:

record30

Increasingly, the line between satire of the Scottish media and reality is non-existent.

Read the rest of this entry →

Bye bye Barnett 135

Posted on November 22, 2015 by

For over two years now, this site has been warning that the UK government will take the earliest opportunity it thinks it can possibly get away with to abolish the Barnett Formula, the funding mechanism which the No campaign sold as the biggest benefit of Scotland remaining in the Union.

formula

The Formula is hated almost everywhere else in the UK, by both politicians and the English (especially) public, who see it as an over-generous subsidy to the scrounging Jocks, and with the threat of independence theoretically removed after the referendum there’s very little protecting it.

Neither Labour nor the Tories – with just one Scottish MP each – would have much to lose politically from reducing Scottish funding by billions of pounds they could use to bribe swing voters in England instead. Barnett’s partial survival was the only solid commitment made in The Vow, but it’s set to be slashed by the Scotland Bill, and the smaller it gets the less resistance there will be to its total removal.

This week the House Of Lords made lots of headlines by highlighting the shambolic, half-baked state of the Bill, which hasn’t yet come up with a “fiscal framework” to replace the bulk of Barnett. But make no mistake – the Lords want it gone just as much as everyone else does.

Read the rest of this entry →

Chiels that ding 251

Posted on November 19, 2015 by

The Unionist media has leapt on former SNP adviser Alex Bell’s blog post about the economic case for independence this week like a starving dog thrown a sausage.

It’s been wringing articles out of it for days, the latest being Torcuil Crichton’s column in today’s Daily Record, in which the unembarrassable hack (last seen trumpeting an entirely imaginary £20bn increase in Holyrood’s budget from the Smith Commission proposals) rather audaciously takes someone else to task over an economic “lie”.

tcbs

Bell’s article is such self-evidently weak sauce that we haven’t bothered with it until now. But as it seems clear that the papers are going to talk about nothing else for the forseeable future, we may as well point out the obvious.

Read the rest of this entry →

The sacrificial bams 381

Posted on November 18, 2015 by

The Additional Member System by which the Scottish Parliament elects its MSPs is a fascinating construct. One of its functions, at least in theory, is to ensure that every party gets its best and brightest talents into the Holyrood chamber, by providing them with a “second chance” in the form of the regional lists.

The Conservatives, for example, would be hard pushed to ever get their leader elected if they could only contest constituency seats. Ruth Davidson got a pitiful 1,845 votes in Glasgow Kelvin in 2011, and whatever you think of the Tories it’s hard to dispute that she’s one of their more able operators. (Faint praise though that may be.)

bunchofcharlies

One weakness of the system is that regional MSPs are sometimes seen as “second class” members, having been personally (and in Davidson’s case, comprehensively) rejected by the electorate but still snuck in against the voters’ wishes under cover of the list. But in the current era of remarkable domination by the SNP, for the opposition it’s increasingly being chosen to fight for a constituency that’s the booby prize.

Read the rest of this entry →

The axe-persons cometh 114

Posted on November 16, 2015 by

When we commission polls we don’t like to just ask people easy questions like who their favourite member of One Direction is. We like to put them on the spot and make them actually think about stuff, and this time was no different:

The UK government is imposing severe cuts to tax credits and benefits in order to save £12 billion from its budget. Scotland’s per-capita share of the cuts would be around £1 billion.

The Scottish Government will in future have the power to compensate those who lose out, by creating new payments it’ll have to fund itself.

Which of the following is closest to your view?”

Because we thought it was unlikely any Scottish Labour MSPs would be taking our poll, we decided to discount the “magic lots of extra money out of thin air” option and only allow respondents to pick from intellectually-coherent choices.

Their answers were enlightening.

Read the rest of this entry →

Brick walls and open doors 234

Posted on November 15, 2015 by

The task facing the Scottish independence movement is to change the minds of just 6% of Scots. That’s all it would take to turn September 2014’s defeat into a victory if and when another referendum comes around, and when you put it like that it doesn’t sound like an impossible job.

brickdoor

The question for Yes supporters is where to focus their energies. A proportion of people who live in Scotland will never vote for independence no matter what, for a variety of reasons we don’t need to go into here. But we’ve always wondered exactly how big that proportion was, so in our latest Panelbase poll we just asked straight out.

Read the rest of this entry →

Lords and ladies 60

Posted on November 15, 2015 by

The House of Lords has been in the news quite a bit recently, one way and another. So in our latest poll we thought it might be fun to ask a few questions about it.

ladymone

We decided to have something for everyone.

Read the rest of this entry →

Dead air 132

Posted on November 15, 2015 by

A few weeks ago, we were told by a source that BBC Scotland’s flagship weeknight current-affairs show Scotland 2015 was recording some truly shocking viewing figures, in the region of 5,000 people a night. When we sent the BBC an FOI request for the stats, it was rejected, like almost all FOIs to the Corporation are.

deadair

We also looked into trying to get the data from BARB, but they weren’t very helpful either. So the only option we had left to get any sort of idea at all was to ask in our latest Panelbase poll.

When the results came in, we understood why the BBC wanted it kept quiet.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,852 Posts, 1,232,221 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • 100%Yes on How Far To Go, How Far: “I honestly would love to see other women and organizations put their weight behind her appeal. This needs sort and…Dec 12, 15:38
    • AdamH on How Far To Go, How Far: “I don’t know which is more unbelievable 1) That a judgement could contain so many errors 2) That even if…Dec 12, 15:24
    • holymacmoses on How Far To Go, How Far: “Make sure you’re credited for all this research and analysis Mr Wings. The judgement was bizarre if not cynical in…Dec 12, 15:19
    • DaveL on How Far To Go, How Far: “‘The laws an ass’, that’ll be regarded as a top notch compliment now.Dec 12, 15:13
    • Gordon Bain on How Far To Go, How Far: “Utterly shameful! It’s also interesting that even the Record can’t use English properly. “nurse Sandie”? FFS! Nurse Peggie, surely. As…Dec 12, 15:09
    • Stu on How Far To Go, How Far: “I mean, I’m sure no actual judge would do the following, so I’m talking about a hypothetical judge in a…Dec 12, 15:08
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell on How Far To Go, How Far: “Zounds, the irony!Dec 12, 15:04
    • Captain Caveman on Strike One: “I am the bearer of good news, Northy: No one is trying to kill you – or your imaginary Pictish…Dec 12, 14:34
    • Jay on How Far To Go, How Far: “What, if any, provisions exist for public funding of Mrs. Peggie’s costs? Will we see the day when a Judge…Dec 12, 14:12
    • Sven on How Far To Go, How Far: “Yet again, I feel the MSM are following where our host leads.Dec 12, 14:07
    • Northcode on Strike One: “Hi Marky, Try not be a humungous bore on here today… oops, too late, Marky. And I don’t hate the…Dec 12, 14:04
    • Bruce Williamson on Strike One: “Has nobody questioned what a Doctor is doing in a Nurses area in the first place. Pretty sure the pecking…Dec 12, 14:01
    • sarah on How Far To Go, How Far: “More excellent analysis, Rev. Thank you. [typo – there’s two number 3 problems.]Dec 12, 13:56
    • Southernbystander on Strike One: “Thanks NC. This is the original German: ‘Schießt um die gehörte Musik die Zeit zum strahlenden Kristall zusammen, so fällt…Dec 12, 13:48
    • Northcode on Strike One: “No problem, Jay. Your comment was very clear. I knew fine well that your comment wasn’t directed at me. I…Dec 12, 13:40
    • Giesabrek on How Far To Go, How Far: ““Scotland in 2025 is a country where pretty much nobody is actually responsible of accountable for anything” Should be “responsible…Dec 12, 13:35
    • Mark Beggan on Strike One: “Hi Northy, ‘Colonizing agents’ Seriously? It doesn’t matter how you dress it up Northy. You just can’t get that hatred…Dec 12, 13:27
    • Jay on Strike One: “Hi Northcode, Going back to spoiler alert, my reference to unconstructive comments was not directed at you but at your…Dec 12, 12:48
    • Northcode on Strike One: “I like this comment of yours, Oh, Southern one. Yes… the original German might be useful, and interesting, too. Thanks,…Dec 12, 12:05
    • James Cheyne on Strike One: “The Scottish judges may be knobbled, however due to the pre terms, conditions and articles, one of the major reasons…Dec 12, 11:41
    • Southernbystander on Strike One: “Regarding the fate of comment consigned to the silent void, as Theodor W. Adorno said about music that is written…Dec 12, 11:35
    • Captain Caveman on Strike One: “A truly astonishing read (not in a good way). Just incredible. What an utter shit show. Time to clear the…Dec 12, 11:35
    • Liz on Strike One: “They can’t blame typos as the stupid judge took notes in longhand, causing everyone to slow down with their responses.…Dec 12, 11:32
    • A2 on The ginger stepchild: “thing is , If you realise indi isn’t going to be happening any time soon, then you will prioritise things…Dec 12, 11:21
    • Northcode on Strike One: “Associating the SNP with Scottish independence and the independence movement is now a popular anti-Scots unionist tactic. There are only…Dec 12, 11:08
    • James Cheyne on Strike One: “The Scottish governance are a public Body, the Scottish judges are a public body, the NHS in Scotland are a…Dec 12, 10:53
    • James Cheyne on Strike One: “The NHS is a public Body and cannot overrule Private Rights of the subjects Scotland and neither can judges, Civil…Dec 12, 10:26
    • desimond on Strike One: “Is this outside the remit of our Justice Minister?Dec 12, 10:22
    • PC Foster on Strike One: “Let em talk- they will fade into the background when they realise you are not paying attention.Dec 12, 10:13
    • James Cheyne on Strike One: “It also fails to relate any mention/wording of supreme judgements being capable of overruling it outside the subjects of Scotland,…Dec 12, 10:12
  • A tall tale



↑ Top