The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


You are all idiots

Posted on August 19, 2015 by

Not our judgement, you understand, but that of Scottish Labour spokesclown Michael Kelly, former Lord Provost of Glasgow, speaking on today’s Good Morning Scotland:

(Good Morning Scotland, BBC Radio Scotland, 19 August 2015, 2h 47m)
.

Appearing with a clearly embarrassed Stephen Purcell – the party’s former leader of Glasgow City Council who’s now in the running for the job again following the departure of Gordon Matheson – Kelly echoed the view of right-wing commentators like STV’s Stephen Daisley, the Spectator’s Alex Massie and Chris Deerin of the Daily Mail that the Scottish electorate is in the grip of a kind of quasi-religious mania, hoodwinked out of all reason by the dastardly brainwashing SNP:

“At the moment we’ve got a Teflon-covered SNP and Scottish Governmnent that appears to be able to do no wrong… Nothing sticks, they can get away with all of these things and people still fall over themselves to vote for them.

That’s why I think it’s an irrational kind of voting, and until voters come to their sense and actually look at the arguments again, and appreciate them, the Labour Party’s going to have a very very tough time in Scotland.”

So there you go. You’re just a bunch of thick morons who haven’t appreciated the arguments for the last eight years and need to come to your senses and vote Labour again. We trust you’ve all learned your lesson.

3 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 19 08 15 16:43

    You are all idiots | Speymouth

  2. 21 08 15 16:41

    You are all idiots | Politics Scotland | Scoop...

  3. 15 09 15 07:28

    Boss Kelly’s diagnosis | We Ourselves

278 to “You are all idiots”

  1. baronesssamedi says:

    They don’t get that the SNP is only temporary state of affairs, a means to a better democracy

    Reply
  2. jackie g says:

    Yeah, that will be right.

    Bloody cheek.

    Reply
  3. MolliBlum says:

    Hahahaha… “until voters come to their senses…”
    Aye. Right. Thanks for the heads-up!

    Reply
  4. Lesley-Anne says:

    You are all just a big bunch of bullies! BOO HOO!

    You won’t do what WE tell, you. BOO HOO!

    WE are the party that you need. BOO HOO!

    WE can save you all from this nasty SNP party. BOO HOO!

    You have all been infiltrated by the nasty Cypbernats. BOO HOO!

    Just wait till your father get home. BOO HOO!

    You’ll be laughing on the other side of your face in a minute. BOO HOO!

    Where’s my dummy? BOO HOO!

    What do you mean I am the dummy? BOO HOO!

    I want my mammy! BOO HOO!

    😀 😀 😀 😀

    Reply
  5. Betty Boop says:

    Well, that will have folk flocking to vote Labour!

    Reply
  6. Helena Brown says:

    Hardly likely in my case Mr Kelly, I looked at your Party in 1968 and found it wanting then, if anything the Labour Party has sunk even lower in my opinion and looks like most others. It really is time that you were held to the same sort of scrutiny that you and your mates in Labour BBC use on the SNP.

    Reply
  7. CageyBee says:

    I almost did my self an injury in the shower this morning as this drivel came on and my first reaction was to jump out and change the channel before the radio was sent flying out the window

    Reply
  8. david agnew says:

    You can personalise attacks of your political opponents – that’s to be expected when you can’t compete with that party’s vision or popularity. Members of the electorate can have a go at each other, that’s just par for the course.

    But the big no no. The one thing you must never, ever do when you are a politician. Is to attack the electorate you are trying to win over.

    Reply
  9. tombee says:

    Kelly seems to aspire to the view, that the Scottish electorate are fools, to be so enamoured by the SNP government. A government he maintains is a failing Scottish SNP Government. Stating they fail at everything they do. He also implies that the same electorate have no right to vote for the SNP, and should only provide votes for Labour. His is the arrogance of entitlement. He believes in his own self right to the status of permenancy. A position that should never be questioned by any of the electorate. If they do so, they must be cretins.

    Reply
  10. Steve Bowers says:

    I was pishin masel laughing when he said that, what a numpty

    Reply
  11. frogesque says:

    In a democracy if I choose to be a ‘thick moron’ I will.

    Not so thick that I would consider SLAB as anything other than a bunch of opportunistic liers though.

    Reply
  12. frankieboy says:

    Nothing sticks, they can get away with all of these things and people still fall over themselves to vote for them. Labour- 1950-2014…RIP

    Reply
  13. ScottieDog says:

    Confirmed I am an idiot.

    Reply
  14. Jock McDonnell says:

    I couldn’t believe he said it.

    I have a recurring ironic image in my head of him & Caesar, tattered UJ in hand, running to the barricades to defend the union.
    Makes me smile.

    Reply
  15. heedtracker says:

    Wonder what that “wheel” is meant to be. SLabour think they own Scotland and it must be rather frustrating right now. 70+ years right to reign over their Scotland region and every 21st century Scottish/UK election has seen them slide further and further down the UKOK drain.

    Can BBC creep show really stop people voting SNP? no pressure lads n lasses of Pacific Quay, no pressure at all:D

    Reply
  16. Fred says:

    The sooner that crew are chucked out of the city chambers & we get a look at the books, the better!

    Reply
  17. jimnarlene says:

    “That’s why I think it’s an irrational kind of voting, and until voters come to their sense and actually look at the arguments again, and appreciate them, the Labour Party’s going to have a very very tough time in Scotland.”

    It is because the voters have came to their senses, and stopped voting for councillors promoted above their pay grade that, the Labour party is having and will continue to have a very very tough time in Scotland.

    That and they’re a bunch of useless, careerist, opportunistic, vainglorious tractors to the working class.

    Reply
  18. Tackety Beets says:

    I heard it live and nearly pranged ma car !

    Meant to ping you an e-mail to alert you…..only stopped laughing as I eat lunch now !

    As always yer on da button Rev , well done.

    It the voters fault ………

    Reply
  19. John Moss says:

    Wow.

    It’s this robotic even mindless denial of reality which is consistantly being promoted by unionists that amazes me.

    The public have made their voting wishes clear yet not one unionist recognises this.

    It just beggars belief.

    Reply
  20. Lollysmum says:

    How to make friends & influence people Scottish branch of UK Labour style.

    Wonder how many voters they’ll persuade to return with performances like this.

    This is Day 3 of Kezia’s reign & it’s not going too well is it 😉

    Carry on-loving it!

    Reply
  21. Stoker says:

    Purcell = Another disgraced coke-head.

    Kelly = A nugget who’s been lying to the people of Glasgow for more than 40 years. A person who, along with other friends and family, almost bankrupted and destroyed Scotland’s largest and most successful football club. Who emptied the biscuit tin, Kelly?

    Nope, there is absolutely no reason to trust in anything any of these two twats have to say. They are Slabber through and through!

    Reply
  22. count jegster says:

    He seems to think we are all stupid. Typical labour no wonder their extinct

    Reply
  23. Capella says:

    Another instance of Brecht’s advice: time for Labour to dissolve the people and elect another one.

    Reply
  24. No no no...Yes says:

    Je suis stupid.

    Why, oh why does the BBC give this man airtime?

    I’m sure Ms Dugdale will have words with him, “Well done Michael”

    The all-new improved mega shiny Labour cabinet is a hoot. I’m putting my money on James Kelly to be the first to make an impact with voters.

    The SNP Govt need an effective opposition, but it is not Labour, Tories or Libdems.
    Will it be the Green Party? What is the Green Party view on indyref2?

    Reply
  25. Tinto Chiel says:

    Wow! He’s good, isn’t he? Can’t we have him on every morning, perhaps in tandem with McTernan, in a slot called Why Youse Is All Eejits, By The Way?

    I still say there are secret SNP agents: nothing else explains their loony behaviour.

    Reply
  26. Andymac says:

    Well, even if Michael Kelly can’t see it, since the General Election, “Glasgow’s MILES Better” 🙂

    Reply
  27. Camz says:

    Different when they were getting 41 MPs in 2005 and 2010 for fucking up Iraq, Afghanistan, MPs’ Expenses and many, many more.

    They didn’t listen and now we have the reality of what happens when a party with little mandate ignores their electorate time and again. Their arrogance is still palpable.

    Labour no more.

    Reply
  28. Marie Clark says:

    I came to my senses a long time ago. That’s why I don’t vote Labour.

    Boo feckin hoo Kelly, get over yourself. Eejit!

    Reply
  29. Calum says:

    What a load of rubbish. SNP are the only party that are willing to move Scotland forward labour and the others are holding Scotland back.

    Reply
  30. Macart says:

    Oooor, it could be we do understand and appreciate the arguments only too well and that after due consideration and deliberation our decision as an electorate is as follows.

    That Labour failed us on every conceivable level. They lied to us, stole from us, turned us against each other with premeditation and with personal gain and political profit their only object. That Labour used/abused the positions of trust and power WE placed them in. That Labour and their media support are guilty of naked and malicious manipulation of their own electorate for self serving political ends, because it sure as shootin’ wasn’t to any clear fucking benefit of ours.

    That when we needed them most to be the party of the people, the poor, the working man and woman, the common folk. When we needed a Labour party that could work with others in government and be still proud to do so in our name, THEY ABANDONED US in favour of focus groups, spads, marginal seats and ELECTAFUCKINGBILITY.

    Reply
  31. Lesley-Anne says:

    For a wee bit of added hilarity folks try this:

    FORMER social justice minister Jackie Baillie is to spearhead the opposition attack on the SNP Government in the forthcoming Holyrood election campaign.

    This is in today’s Hootsmon. Sorry I can’t link to it, don’t want to link to actual page and I don’t have the archive thingy up on my new hard drive yet. 😉

    Reply
  32. Willie John says:

    I believe that Labour could indeed form a Scottish Government, and that Ms Dugdale may indeed become the First Minister – but it wont be until at least 10 years after Scotland becomes independent!

    Reply
  33. Cuddis says:

    Ha! I listened to this too. It was great. In a few sentences Mr Kelly gave substance to the fag end of Labour’s ideology, rendered souless by triangulation, a twisted and stunted thing you couldn’t sell on eBay let alone to the electorate. And now with it’s head so far up its own bahookie it may yet prove impossible to extract.

    Quel dommage!

    Reply
  34. The Hairy Caber says:

    It’s a shame he couldn’t name any services that are a devolved power that is funded by the block grant – NHS, Education, Justice. If you cut the funding to those services, of course they are going to suffer; so lets do away with Free Prescriptions and see how popular that would make the SNP. Or perhaps Mr Kelly would like the SG to cut the 80p in every £1 block grant Glasgow Council gets, to fund its services; forcing them to raise council tax on their residents?

    Reply
  35. Andy-B says:

    Michael Kelly and Stephen Purcell, two very good reasons not to vote Labour.

    Reply
  36. Roddy Nicoll says:

    Anyone just seen the Headline on the Mail online?

    Of all the Ashley Madison emails leaked there happens to be , shock, Horror….. An SNP MP!

    What in 1.2 Million members who details have been leaked the only one of any note that the Mail could find was an SNP MP??

    Reply
  37. Stoker says:

    Haw Kelly, save yer breath, man!

    Our very own village idiot on here wouldn’t even vote for Slabber, how fecking idiotic is that, eh! How will us mere peasants survive? The mind boggles! Where would we be without the likes of you and Purcell, eh! You’ll soon see how thick we truly are when we rid Glasgow of your ilk.

    Watch this space. Idiots-R-Us right enough.

    Reply
  38. heedtracker says:

    It it was me in charge of their “vote SLab ya ingrates and diddies” campaign, I’d take a leaf out of the Vote anyone but SNP electioneering book, by Edwardian butcher’s boy impersonator and future Lord Murray of Morningside, in his triumphant 2015 general election campaign. so, just NEVER EVER NEVER mention Labour ever again in any kind of shape or form, to anyone, anywhere in your Scotland region, ever.

    link to bbc.scotlandshire.co.uk

    Future Lord Ian of Morningside, Embro, last great bastion of Corbynite Labour Party socialism, mentioned the Labour Party once but he thinks he got away with it.

    Reply
  39. raineach says:

    the people have forfeited the confidence of the government and can only win it back by redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier for the government to dissolve the people and re-elect another? [Brecht]

    Reply
  40. Sandra says:

    The SNP hardly need to campaign with foot shooters like Kelly around. Bravo to BBC Scotland for giving the moron maximum airtime so as many Scots as possible get the message.

    Reply
  41. Lollysmum says:

    O/T now on Livestream

    Tommy ShepherdSNP from Edinburgh YES Cafe
    link to livestream.com

    Reply
  42. Grouse Beater says:

    We arrive at that time of the year when we compare dimwit coonsillors to stand-up comedians at the Embra Festival of Arts, vying for a Perrier Award.

    Kelly should be short-listed. No doubt about it.

    Let’s get up his nose with an annual Referendum Day:
    link to grousebeater.wordpress.com

    Reply
  43. Colin says:

    “The electorate need to come to their senses” Pot, Kettle and Black comes to mind here !!

    Reply
  44. proudscot says:

    When the first SNP gains start to be announced after the next GCC election, the sound of the document shredders going at full tilt will be deafening, as Kelly and his crew frantically try to destroy the evidence of dodgy deals and corrupt practises over their time in office.

    Meanwhile, is “NHS shambles” the latest soundbite thought up by Jenny Marra, in another futile attempt to give Eleanor “NHS IN CRISIS” Bradford yet another non-fact-based attack on the SNP Government?

    Reply
  45. David S. Briggs says:

    @Stoker

    ‘Scotland’s largest and most successful football club’.

    I wasn’t aware he had anything to do with Rangers FC?

    Reply
  46. Irena says:

    So happy to be a ‘thick moron’ – and I’ll keep on being a ‘thick moron’ until, and beyond, the time everyone of these vainglorious tossers is thrown out of office.

    Attacking the people you want to win over……who’s the ‘thick moron’??

    Reply
  47. Jimbo says:

    Reminds me of Curran’s Freudian slip when she said the electorate had to regain Labour’s trust.

    These London Labour erselings really do believe they have a divine right to own all the votes in Scotland.

    Reply
  48. Soda says:

    Heard this this morning getting the kids ready for school… put a smile on my face all day lol

    Reply
  49. msean says:

    I’m sure I heard “police running amok”. Can’t see that myself,and I can say that the NHS in Scotland is doing a great job as far as I can see by recent experience.

    Unionists couldn’t complain anyway,they voted NO after Labour and their bettertogether best pals told everyone that everything is fine just under a year ago.

    Reply
  50. heedtracker says:

    SLab will always have hypocrisy red and blue tory The Guardian style, yesterday Graun said

    “The new Turner prize bus tours reek of tartan fetishism
    Jonathan Jones”

    “But nationalism cannot leave it there. Nationalism is a toxin. It is viral. Once it gets in the cultural bloodstream its petty attitudes corrupt everything.”

    link to theguardian.com

    Today, Putin, Nazi’s, Nicola Sturgeon all in their UKOK oner.

    Rancid Graun says

    “imagine if Nicola Sturgeon posed in a bathyscaphe as she descended into the North Sea to prove the antiquity of Scottish fishing rights in a future cod war with England – it is important to recognise how astonishingly effective such propaganda has been”

    Our imperial are displeased/morons.

    Reply
  51. Scottish Lass says:

    He was quite happy when people followed Labour blindly….

    Reply
  52. We need more Labour Party apparatchiks and former apparatchiks to come forward to trumpet this message. It has worked so well to date.

    Exquisitely textured hubris of this quality should not be hidden away. Deny Boss Kelly no platform to display it so that he might to demonstrate to 60% of the Scottish electorate that he has the requisite vision, and that they are as thick as two short planks.

    Michael Kelly, dispositive evidence that absence of a cerebral cortex is no barrier to advancement in the Labour Party.

    Reply
  53. Embradon says:

    Where did all the money go when you were running Celtic, Michael?

    Reply
  54. Fiona says:

    I truly do not understand the labour party. They have been wiped out in Scotland, and still it does not appear to occur to them that they are in any way responsible for that outcome.

    I get that those in Westminster can live in their neoliberal bubble, and remain unaware of just how they are coming across elsewhere: but Mr Kelly does not have that excuse, even.

    I get that sometimes it is important to recognise a “50,000 flies” argument: the electorate are not always wise and not always right on every issue and principle must of course sometimes result in real leadership: that is direct challenge to the views of the majority and a recognition that the principle must be defended even when unpopular. But that applies to particular issues, and is not in play here. The electorate is not wrong about what it wants: it is like telling someone that he honestly does not prefer dark chocolate to milk chocolate, not matter what he says: it makes you look foolish

    I doubt anyone who votes SNP agrees with every policy they adopt. That is also true for voters who support other parties. It is in the nature of party politics that compromise is made, and the voter weighs up the various policy options and chooses the party which best reflects his or her views. With the exception of some very vital single issues, which may be “red lines” for an individual, what one really votes for is a party which shares one’s view of the kind of society you want to live in, as a general thing. At least I think that is true.

    This is the essence that they don’t seem to grasp. Those of us who want to live in a social democracy have been abandoned by the labour party. They no longer share that aspiration in principle or in practice. Only the SNP currently represents that strand in our electorate. Mr Kelly and his party may not think that is a true or a fair perception, but the evidence is there in Labour’s adoption of the neoliberal stance at every turn.

    I am not irrational. I know what I want from a government, and Labour do not offer it. They oppose it, and in doing so they work with the tories to make society worse in every way that counts.

    Since Thatcher’s victory in 1979 the things I care about have been undermined. Even the things neoliberals value are worse than they were prior to the shift in economic priority from pursuit of full employment to pursuit of low inflation. We have higher unemployment as a policy choice; we have lower growth; we have greater inequality. All of that is perfectly demonstrable, and it is not a law of nature. It is a direct and predictable result of their policy choices.

    There is no labour party any more. It really is as simple as that. And every time they open their mouths the re-affirm that truth.

    I am sad to see the demise of labour but it happened long ago and I no longer grieve. And this, too, they need to understand. Many have come to that conclusion later than I did: and if Corbyn wins, and if he can do what he says he wants to do, some may return to the labour fold. But even if he wins, he is surrounded by saboteurs: he has less chance than Syriza, for he will face the global elite, and he has the added disadvantage of being beset by their agents within his party.

    Only a truly clean break with the Blairites can save labour: only a clean break with the union can save Scotland. That is how I see the situation and I do not think it is me who is irrational. I think that it is Mr Kelly and his kind who are.

    Reply
  55. Seppington says:

    @ David S. Briggs:

    He said “Scotland’s largest and most successful football club”

    not

    “Scotland’s deadest football club who’s tribute act are followed by Scotland’s biggest bunch of gullible idiots”

    Reply
  56. Calum Craig says:

    “Cutting your throat to feed yourself”??!!

    Reply
  57. mike cassidy says:

    Those were the days my friend.

    link to thedrum.com

    Reply
  58. liz says:

    He makes me really angry. I think it was when lab were in power at WM, they introduced the ridiculous charge system where power stations in less populated areas had to pay the national grid to take their/our excess energy.

    And even if they didn’t they made no effort to change it.

    Since Scotland has a low population density, this was discrimination.

    As a direct result of that Longannet will close but its OK cos a new power station is opening in Kent.

    Its the likes of that eejit and his party that keep Scotland in poverty and cause migration

    Reply
  59. Frank says:

    “.until voters come to their sense[……] the labour party’s going to have a very very tough time”.

    We are stupid and they are entitled? Dear God in Heaven! I voted this mob for 30 years. I am an arse!

    Reply
  60. Luigi says:

    Angry rosette monkey, he say voters are thick, but actually what he mean to say is:

    “It’s no fair – the voters are smarter than me!”

    Reply
  61. Geoff Huijer says:

    Ah, so I take it the whole ‘we need to listen to the electorate’ thing has all been well & truly flushed doon the cludgie then?

    Reply
  62. Luigi says:

    If they took off those unionist, BritNat blinkers for just one second, they would realise that the vast majority of people supporting Scottish independence are neither starstruck, nor blinded, nor hypnotised idiots. They are just ordinary folk who can think for themselves.

    Reply
  63. Kennedy says:

    Are labour blind or stupid? genuine question.

    They just dont get that the electorate has taken politics back from the conmen. We will no longer just do what they tell us. They have to appeal to us or we will not vote them in.

    If we do vote someone in we will now be watching them very closely and vote them out if they under perform. Teflon has nothing to do with it. Labour are shite, thats why people vote for the SNP.

    Reply
  64. john king says:

    Mr Christian I’ll hang you from the yardarm sir!
    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  65. ahundredthidiot says:

    I am NOT an idiot!….

    …..oh wait……

    Reply
  66. David McCann says:

    Here’s why Mr Kelly.

    This from a Labour voter following defeat at GE.

    “I wish I could go back and undo my vote for Labour yesterday. They really are taking the proverbial.”

    And this from last week.

    Anyone But Corbyn

    Reply
  67. ronnie anderson says:

    Oh Doctor doctor heal thyself, whit ! your no that kind of doctor, well go tae the ither doctor & take the meds he prescribe’s, free curtesy of the SNP Gov.That may stick in yer craw.

    Kelly,s slipped doon the Totem Pole, but he likes tae keep his hawn in lol.

    Reply
  68. Lesley-Anne says:

    Kennedy says:

    Are labour blind or stupid? genuine question.

    Yes!

    Next question please. 😀

    Reply
  69. Grouse Beater says:

    Geoff on Michael Kelly’s dismissal of the electorate’s will:

    “I take it the whole ‘we need to listen to the electorate’ Labour thing has all been well & truly flushed doon the cludgie then?”

    Spot on!

    Reply
  70. Jim Mitchell says:

    Now that’s what you call a real Labour branch office spokesperson, whether you mean old or new Labour, start of by insulting all those voters you want to win back, yes that should do the trick!

    Reply
  71. Gavin Greig says:

    @Fiona: Fantastic comment.

    Reply
  72. Mealer says:

    Labour really don’t have much to offer.

    Reply
  73. heedtracker says:

    “Labour is seeking legal advice to ensure its leadership election is being conducted according to party rules, amid fears that the contest is being infiltrated by people who oppose the party.”

    Are they red tory boys red or blue? This is rancid The Gruan under photo of Harriet Harman, looking suspicious. Harman looking suspicious and not, Harman looking suspicious.

    What on earth will red tory Slabour do when ye Labour man of England JC, gets to the dispatch box and starts saying actual old style leftie stuff?

    BBC vote SLab Scotland will go even more madder now, trying to keep in red SLabour toryboys by attacking, Nic Sturgeon and Jezza Corbyn. Cant wait:D

    Reply
  74. Dr Jim says:

    @Baronessamedi

    SNP temporary ? in what way do you mean ?

    Reply
  75. call me dave says:

    As a couple of us commented two threads ago that these labour folk continue to pop up on the BBC Scotland media, like a bad penny to howl down the SG.
    Folk see through their paper thin arguments and generally ignore the fuzzy noise. BUT…

    Gordon Wilson’s ‘SNP bad quotes to go’ for the MSM. A gift to the Hootsman and the Record. That’s three times this month counting today.

    Did someone in the SNP do him a bad turn in times past. He’s entitled to his view but everything in moderation surely.

    A whillygoleerie and no mistake! 🙁

    Reply
  76. Chris says:

    Never mind Jeremy Corbyn, Michael Kelly is the man to lead the Labour party, he’s bound to win back Scotland with this sort of rousing speech. He’s got my vote because I am just a irrational simpleton with a democratic deficit between my ears who votes in the same way as I play pin the tail on the donkey.

    Reply
  77. Martin says:

    O/T: The public break up of erstwhile lovers Daisley and the Rev is heartbreaking.

    Reply
  78. JayR says:

    Blind Unionist Scots like Kelly and his ilk hate democracy when their party isn’t in power, seek to bad-mouth and damage Scottish democracy and our public institutions (i.e. health service, police, education etc.) in cheap, bitter attempts to regain that power and seem to be embarrassed by the very existence of Scotland and the Scottish people.

    Vote the way the want, reset the clocks to 2006! We’re all idiots if we don’t!

    Reply
  79. Robert Louis says:

    ‘Labour Spokesclown, Michael Kelly’. Mwahahahahahahaha 🙂

    Seriously though, I always thought I voted for the SNP because of their competence in Government, the fact they fight Scotland’s corner, and agree with me, that the decrepit, stinking, unwanted, one-sided, undemocratic union with England needs to end.

    Now, having listened to the irrefutable ‘wisdom’ of that Labour party ‘oracle’, Michael Kelly, I have realised the folly of my ways, and realise I just vote SNP because I am too thick to see through the hype, and because I inwardly believe Nicola Sturgeon can walk on water – she can can’t she?

    Seriously Labour, I give up.

    Reply
  80. Lesley-Anne says:

    For anyone who is interested, and I know the vast majority are not 😉 , the latest bit of the new floating football park … to be named H.M.S. Prince of Wales. at some dim and distant point in the future, is currently South East of Wick heading for Rosyth.

    link to marinetraffic.com

    Reply
  81. galamcennalath says:

    “people still fall over themselves to vote for them.”

    Half of Scots voting SNP? A sensible choice given recent unionist incompetence and behaviour.

    Everyone should remember that half of English voted for Con+UKIP ie parties way out on the extreme right. Now that really is inexplicable – we can only presume they definitely have been hoodwinked out of all reason!

    Reply
  82. Robert Louis says:

    Fiona at 436pm

    Quote “Only a truly clean break with the Blairites can save labour: only a clean break with the union can save Scotland. That is how I see the situation and I do not think it is me who is irrational. I think that it is Mr Kelly and his kind who are.”

    That is it in a nutshell. Labour can witter on as much as it wants, and even elect Corbyn, but we the Scottish electorate have moved on. Labour in Scotland died many, many years ago, all that is left is a rotting corpse and some maggots.

    Reply
  83. Deborah Shearer says:

    so yet again, it is only democracy if you vote the way they tell you, anything else is apparently total muppetry and rebellion. I hate to be the one to tell them but what passes for the Scottish Labour Party are the muppets at the moment, and the show just keeps going.

    Reply
  84. Donald MacKenzie says:

    The difficult thing to get your head round is that they actually seem to believe that. Naughty, naughty voters!

    Reply
  85. mogabee says:

    If SLabour are Unionist as Kelly states, then why will they not say it out loud?

    I think they are big fearties! 😀

    Reply
  86. K1 says:

    Eloquent and nuanced comment as ever Fiona. And an utterly accurate synopsis of the problem with the Labour party. Brilliant.

    Reply
  87. call me dave says:

    You know what Scottish labour just doesn’t exist in the MSM daun Sarf! Had a turn through the usual suspects and not even a whisper about Kezia’s reshuffle.

    But a comment about Gordon’s rant here from Mr White. 🙂
    ————————————————————–
    Will the sermon, for it was close to being one, make any difference to the looming landslide? Possibly not in such heady days. Brown’s own career had taught him five lessons, he concluded: Labour activists must seriously seek power, but also listen, they must go beyond sloganising and address problems, they must offer hope, but also vote, not as a protest, but to help the neediest.

    It’s not like clicking “like” on Facebook, he told them. Facebook, eh? Does Jeremy do Facebook?

    link to archive.is

    Reply
  88. K1 says:

    Och Martin they were only flirting…hardly lovers 🙂

    Reply
  89. Bill McDermott says:

    That’ll be the Irish nationalist who believes in a united motherland but sooks up to the Britnat establishment. I can’t work it out.

    Well done Rev for picking it up. I knew you would.

    Reply
  90. Caroline says:

    Is this the same Michael Kelly that was in charge of Celtic Football Club at the time of the biscuit tin fiasco?

    Reply
  91. call me dave says:

    Michty! 30p no more for your Irn Bru bottle. Big news on BBC News Drive with a wee discussion.

    No SNP spokeperson was invited to comment and labour didn’t put up a candidate either, that’s political balance then. 🙂

    Footie links Glasgow teams KO soon.

    link to myp2p.ec OR

    link to mytvlive.me

    Reply
  92. steveasaneilean says:

    O/T I know Stu but are you going to do anything on the DR coming out for Corbyn?

    Putting his pro-Union to the side does this mean the DR is now anti-Trident, pro renationalisation of the public utilities, etc.

    If not how can they be supporting him?

    Reply
  93. Gerry says:

    the problem for SLab is that they have never had to go chasing the electorate here before and they quite simply don’t know how to do it. Somebody above spoke about how the big no no was to attack the electorate – and they’re right. It’s politics 101 and actually just common sense really. Not surprising then that Slab fail to meet the mark.
    The saddest thing is that these people STILL believe that they have a God given right to govern Scotland. If these people want to remain subservient to Westmonster then that is a matter for them and their party. That they believe that the scottish people will get back in their box and happily follow them back down that road is a matter that requires some serious therapy on their part.
    Slab is in essence asking the electorate to change their views in order to accommodate labour policy and fall back in line. Therein lies the arrogance that is the foundation of the labour party in Scotland. This interview confirms to me just how far beyond repair the labour party is. Delighted.

    Reply
  94. Lesley-Anne says:

    Stand by your beds folks.

    Oh on second thoughts it may be better if you are either sitting down … preferably on the floor for what you are about to read here.

    Please keep all laughter down to a dull roar … PLEASE! 😀

    link to newsshaft.com

    Reply
  95. heedtracker says:

    If not how can they be supporting him?

    Daily Record are the most cunning out there, they’ve decided, so at a guess I’d say those freaks think that JC is the man to take away SNP voters that used to vote SLab, but I could be wrong.

    Maybe the brilliant Crichton Torquil will tell us.

    Reply
  96. chris kilby says:

    Scottish Voters have come to their senses. That’s why we stopped voting Labour.

    (Always nice to have your worst suspicions confirmed. Labour isn’t useless after all. We’re just stupit.)

    Reply
  97. Fiona says:

    @Steveasanalien

    I think it is quite simple. They think he will win back Scottish voters to labour. They may be right: certainly labour’s best chance. They do not care about policy, it is just to dish SNP.

    Reply
  98. chris kilby says:

    “Better to remain silent and have the world think you a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”

    (Abraham Lincoln)

    Or, as an old, dear friend who is no longer with us* used to always say:

    “If yoo keep yer mooth shut, only yoo ‘n’ me’ll know yer stupit.”

    (* He’s no longer with anyone.)

    Reply
  99. Brian Doonthetoon says:

    Tonight, I have watched the Grampian news at 6 (I know, showing my age), followed by Reporting Scotlandshire on the BBC.

    The phrase “Labour Values” must have been uttered around 8 times, over the two programmes, including by Glen Campbell on the BBC.

    The thing is, I don’t know what these “Labour Values” are, because no explanation was given. Are they Labour (Scotlandshire Branch) values, or Jeremy Corbyn values, or Liz Kendall values, or Tony Blair values?

    Does anybody know?

    Reply
  100. john king says:

    “O/T: The public break up of erstwhile lovers Daisley and the Rev is heartbreaking.”

    Well?
    dont stop there!

    Reply
  101. Brian Doonthetoon says:

    Cue the sad fiddle, John…

    Reply
  102. chris kilby says:

    @ steveasaneilean:

    “O/T I know Stu but are you going to do anything on the DR coming out for Corbyn?

    “Putting his pro-Union to the side does this mean the DR is now anti-Trident, pro renationalisation of the public utilities, etc.

    “If not how can they be supporting him?”

    I expect Stu is still trying to process that information. I know I am.

    Reply
  103. Bob Mack says:

    If Mr Purcell was embarrassed by the remarks that is something.This guy had a permanent white top lip, (figure it out),and was known for hanging out with some famous ganglang figures whilst he was leader of Glasgow Council.

    Now Mr Failed Kelly is telling everybody where we are going wrong. It would never dawn on these narcissists that they are being rejected for being completely inept.

    Reply
  104. thomaspotter2014 says:

    Please excuse the slightly O/T Rev.
    But I just watched BBC REPORTING LABOUR love-in .You gotta check out the 6.30 show.
    Jings Bejeezus and crivvens Kes and her new (see old) team are gonna save Scotland from herself…….again!!!
    Whooooosh.
    Priceless!!!

    Reply
  105. mike cassidy says:

    Here’s the ‘intellectual Tory’ equivalent of Kelly’s idiot claims from Prof Tomkins.

    link to notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    SNP are peaking, and then there is only down – ie voters will return to ‘sensible’ unionist voting.

    Do you think someone should tell him there is more chance of Celtic and Rangers sharing a stadium?

    Reply
  106. chris kilby says:

    So how does Kelly explain the quasi-religious “Corbynmania” currently sweeping his own party…?

    Reply
  107. hamish says:

    Bert Brecht mocked a party functionary who expressed the same views as Kelly in this poem

    link to mrzine.monthlyreview.org

    Reply
  108. call me dave says:

    @Lesley-Anne 🙂

    Business Manager:James Kelly an oxymoron surely… and where is

    The Truth Commission promised by Johann?

    Reply
  109. Cath says:

    We’re going to have a tough time until you come to your senses, you idiots.

    And they really can’t see that’s why they’re losing voters hand over fist.

    Reply
  110. john king says:

    Gabby Logan on a trailer for another mindless britnat shit program says
    RELEASE THE SHEEP!
    says it all really.

    Reply
  111. scottieDog says:

    This stupidity virus affecting us is very infectious judging by the number of people supporting Jeremy Corbyn!

    Reply
  112. heedtracker says:

    Usual propaganda blast from BBC Scotland

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Top half says-

    “Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale announces new frontbench team”

    Bottom half-

    “By Glenn Campbell, BBC Scotland political correspondent
    If Labour’s new team looks a lot like the old team assembled by Jim Murphy, when he was leader, then that’s because it is.

    The names and faces are mostly the same.

    One exception is that Hugh Henry has stood down as justice spokesman, to be replaced by former police chief, Graeme Pearson.”

    Interesting stretching of written BBC English there, “mostly the same” one change in BBC propaganda speak.

    Why don’t Glen Campbell and co just stand for SLab frontbench, who could tell the difference.

    Extraordinary bunch cheats in that mob.

    Reply
  113. chris kilby says:

    I am an idiot.

    But I’m still not daft enough to vote Labour.

    Reply
  114. Lesley-Anne says:

    call me dave says:

    @Lesley-Anne 🙂

    Business Manager:James Kelly an oxymoron surely… and where is

    The Truth Commission promised by Johann?

    Don’t worry CMD that is in hand … honestly. 😛

    As soon as John Chilcot has completed and published his report into Iraq, due any second now 😀 , he will be right on the case. 😀

    Reply
  115. Hoss Mackintosh says:

    Here is a good quote from Jeremy Corbyn: “There’s no God-given right for political parties to exist – they have to mean something to people”.

    Looks like Labour in Scotland is an extinct party then – Dead as a dodo – like Lally.

    Reply
  116. Andy Drynan says:

    Will they never see the wood for the trees ????

    Reply
  117. Kevin Evans says:

    I know we all poke fun at kezzy and Scottish labour and how, well, there a bit thick.

    But image labour actually won and kez was first minister and had to mingle and stuff with other world leaders. Imagine kez sitting talking to Putin.

    How scary is that huh!

    Reply
  118. Iain More says:

    I might be nae wise but I am no a daftie, well no enough of a daftie to vote for any Brit Nat Party or its stooges.

    Reply
  119. Dr Ew says:

    @Fiona, 4.36pm

    Spot on. Labour was complacent, high-handed and small-minded in government but in opposition even worse – utterly peevish, pusillanimous and pea-brained.

    Without effective opposition, however, that same kind of complacency may begin to creep into SNP attitudes, indeed some might say there are already signs of it. With all the best will in the world, people can and do get confused about personal or political expediency and loyalty to the party and lose focus on the bigger picture and building a consensus for the cause.

    Building that consensus is a long, difficult job but more possible than ever, especially if it builds on the fabulous broad-based grassroots movement that was Yes. Yes was not the SNP, nor should it have been, so I hope people will bear in mind; the SNP is not the sole vehicle for independence and indeed cannot achieve it on its own. I hope too people will bear that in mind at the Holyrood elections next year – eye on the bigger picture and the long road to winning the consensus.

    A genuine opposition led by a Yes-supporting party would achieve far more for the quality of government in Scotland AND for independence politics in the long-term.

    Reply
  120. heedtracker says:

    Nice impartial BBC unbiased Glenn Campbellesque display via Jim Naughty this time, sneering, malice dripping, knocking the UKOK stuffing out of SNP Scots.gov at 7am yesterday, kicks off 0.54. You have to some sympathy for Constance here, a raging cringer at 6.45am:-(

    Fair to say Naughtie OBE not a YES vote, retiring the way that one old fraud started and very much enjoying the last, fingers crossed, ever SLabour MP in Westminster, they look like the could be related too.

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Naughty

    link to twitter.com

    Murray

    link to theguardian.com

    Reply
  121. Clootie says:

    “I’m sorry for blaming you for everything I just couldn’t do.”
    ? Christina Aguilera, Christina Aguilera: “Back to Basics”

    Reply
  122. De Valera says:

    @ Bill McDermott

    I totally agree. I have never been able to get my head around these Irish Republican/British Nationalists. I used to work alongside one, it made for many an interesting debate!

    Reply
  123. Gary45% says:

    One of the many reasons past and present members of the Labour party will always side with the union is, they are “ALL TROUGHERS”.
    Come hell or high water they will cling on to any lie, scare story or anything they can say to try and fleece the electorate.
    They have no principles, no decency and will eventually realise they have been found out, because Scotland has woken up.

    Reply
  124. Robert Peffers says:

    @Brian Doonthetoon says: 19 August, 2015 at 6:54 pm:

    ” … Are they Labour (Scotlandshire Branch) values, or Jeremy Corbyn values, or Liz Kendall values, or Tony Blair values?

    Does anybody know?”

    More to the point, Brian, does anybody care?

    Reply
  125. Grouse Beater says:

    Here’s the ‘intellectual Tory’ equivalent of Kelly’s idiot claims from Prof Tomkins.

    Last year at this time it was, “there’s no more than 30% support for independence.”

    Third rate academics like Tomkins get paid for talking nonsense because they have ‘professor’ as a handle.

    Reply
  126. Cordite used to detonate Corbinites.

    link to twitter.com

    Reply
  127. Tam Jardine says:

    Lesley-Anne 5.53pm

    Fitba park? The new carriers are each about the length of the palace of Westminster – slightly shy of 3 pitches long by slightly more than a pitch wide.

    The contract for both is £6.2 billion, but then you’ll need some shiny new warplanes to go with it, otherwise what’s the point? It is not my area by any stretch but from what I’ve read, they will be able to carry amongst other things, 40 Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II ‘stealth multirole fighters’.

    It seems there are 48 of these aircraft on order- struggling to find exact costs but it looks like about £100 million per plane.

    Now this was a programme where it was seriously discussed punting or mothballing the second carrier but it turned out cancelling the contract wasn’t cost effective. This suggests to me that the government thought 2 carriers of this class were unnecessary.

    So here we are in the UK of 2015- we are closing the vice around those unfortunate enough to be reliant on the state whilst simultaneously building an aircraft carrier and a spare aircraft carrier, the construction and the procurement of one type of aircraft alone (there are choppers and all kinds of other munitions to consider) is costing £11 billion.

    If IS decide to construct a navy we will be able to take it down no bother.

    And if the Russians start sniffing about near Europe’s largest arsenal situated, as it is on the doorstep of our largest city, we will have these 2 vast carriers that can travel at 25 knots from wherever they are to intervene.

    I suppose the cost of these 2 beasts will mean that other naval vessels will be sucked in to defend them… concentrating the navy and reducing the spread further. Luckily for us, they don’t bother devoting any vessels to protecting the Scottish coastline so we’ll hardly notice the difference.

    Funny thing about the Royal Navy website- they justify all this because 95% of Britain’s economic activity depends on the oceans. Yet we were constantly told during the indyref that the vast majority of our exports were to the rest of UK!

    That’s me done. Apologies for any inaccuracies. Wake me up when we’re independent.

    Reply
  128. One_Scot says:

    It’s funny but just when you think UK politics can’t get any more ‘effed’ up, it just goes and does it.

    Reply
  129. Alan Mackintosh says:

    Tam Jardine, don’t forget that the new aircraft, which arent even going to be there for years yet, 2020 if I recall correctly are actually pretty crap. They’re multi-role which means they’re not actually very good at any of the individual roles. From memory, stealth capability means no external pylons thus limited payload for bomber. Limited loiter time, so no use as ground support and so on.

    Reply
  130. Robert Peffers says:

    There is absolutely nothing about Kelly’s performance on BBC Labour Radio that is in any way strange. The Labour Scottish Branch Office have been spouting their own particular brand of propaganda for as long as I can remember, (and that memory goes as far back as WWII).

    Their present problem is that the only people who now actually believe it are Labour themselves. Idiots like Kelly actually do genuinely believe it is the electorate who are wrong and Labour who are right and they lack the basic intellect to figure out that, as there are far more voters who do not accept the Labour mantras than who subscribe to them, then the probability is the voters are right and the Labour party, (branch office), who are wrong.

    No one should ever begin to believe their own propaganda.

    Reply
  131. Lenny Hartley says:

    Re f35’s for the carriers, there was a report on Russian RT news the other day which
    Claimed that their was an American report that said that the F35’s did not have the capability to compete against Russian fighters from the 80’s never mind modern fighters.

    Remember it was crash Gordon who signed the order for two carriers with cancellation clauses so severe it is cheaper to build one and mothball it rather than cancel.

    What did that song say again – Gordon is a moron

    Reply
  132. Tam Jardine says:

    Alan Mackintosh 

    Aye- when I was reading up on it (briefly) there were phrases like  “inferior acceleration, inferior climb, inferior sustained turn capability” cropped up. I feared mission creep- there is a much bigger article to be written on this.

    Reply
  133. Tam Jardine says:

    Lenny Hartley

    Indeed – I think this is the link to that report:

    link to archive.is

    Reply
  134. Dave the idiot jock squirrel says:

    Lmao.

    More of the utterly petulant, complacent, derisory, sneering elitist shite that got Labour in this mess in the first place. Very very thick-skulled people, with an aural cavity that starts in one ear and progresses to exit straight out the other, bypassing the brain entirely, assuming there is one in there at all.
    A party that is conspiring to destroy its own massively-popular leadership candidate with the added help of the most-unwelcome senile dinosaur that is Gordon why-won’t-you-just-bore-off-already Brown.
    And they think they can offer advice to the Scottish electorate?
    What a totally horrendous trainwreck. I hope the Tories paid off the Blairite hardcores well for their services, because they are dead and buried up here, courtesy of their own spades no less.

    The Labour Party. Like Tories, minus the smarts.

    P.S. Know something. In the short term I’ve kind of drifted away from thinking about independence. I think it’s inevitable; it’s just a matter of guessing how long away it is. So with regards to my repeated SNP vote. I like them. They mess up some stuff; they’re good at other things. Ho hey. The reason they get my vote is that each and every one of them genuinely looks like they’re aspiring to be good public representatives. Nobody’s perfect. They do a competent job and make full use of a devolved parliament. That’s why I vote for them.
    So ironically, post-referendum-fury, I stand by them more than ever.

    Reply
  135. Lesley-Anne says:

    I do admit to being *ahem* economical with the truth re the football pitch Tam. 😀

    As far as the 48(ish) Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II ‘stealth multirole fighters’ are concerned Tam I would suggest that 40 would be, as you say, intended to used on board the carrier. The remaining 8 will I suspect be intended to used as two seat trainers etc for aircrew training.

    No doubt there will be some Merlins on board the sea going flat top as well as the F35’s but at the end of the day these are one hell of a size of flat top for around 60 – 70 aircraft, in my view. Thanks Broon the Loon ya MUPPET!

    One thing we can not forget either Tam is that these *ahem* aircraft will not become fully operational until AFTER 2020.

    In terms of once they become *ahem* operational Tam then this may be the make up, possibly, of the Carrier Battle Group that we may see in peacetime:

    1 QE class carrier
    1 type 45 Destroyer
    1-2 type 23/26 frigates equipped with towed array sonar
    1 Astute class SSN
    1 Tide class tanker/supply ship

    Obviously when we next go to war under Cameron, any day now I suspect, then this CBG will be increased.

    I wouldn’t worry about protecting Scotland’s coastline Tam, remember we have Scotland’s fishermen, Twitter and Facebook to rely on for OUR defence. Let’s face it the Scottish fishermen, Twitter and Facebook are definitively MORE reliable than anything pushed out by the M.O.D. in London!

    Reply
  136. Lesley-Anne says:

    Lenny Hartley says:

    What did that song say again – Gordon is a moron

    That would be this song you are referring to then Lenny? 😀

    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  137. Lesley-Anne says:

    Tam Jardine says:

    Lenny Hartley

    Indeed – I think this is the link to that report:

    link to archive.is

    Reading that first sentence Tam brought back memories of when the Tornado F3 first entered service.

    The pricey new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter?—?the main new warplane for the U.S. military and many of America’s closest allies?—?can’t turn fast enough to defeat other jet fighters in close aerial combat.

    They had gone over to Norway to fly in a joint air exercise and lo and behold this sentence almost replicates exactly what the thoughts were back then. Nice to see nothing has changed in 30 years. 😀

    Reply
  138. Tam Jardine says:

    Lesley-Anne

    CBG? Who ARE you?

    Reply
  139. Tinto Chiel says:

    “cynicalHighlander says:
    19 August, 2015 at 8:55 pm
    Cordite used to detonate Corbinites.”

    Thanks for all those tweets, CH. It seems Labour is in meltdown on both sides of the dyke, what with Kooky Kelly blaming the electorate up here and The Party banning union members down there. It’s a party which long ago forgot its purpose but I just wish it would do us all a favour and hurry up and do the decent thing.

    Oops, silly me! The very idea!

    Reply
  140. Robert Kerr says:

    The question that must be asked is why the QE2 class carriers can only fly the F35B, a variant of one aircraft from one manufacturer? Nothing else.

    What a situation to be in. Why? Who?

    This is not funny at all!

    Reply
  141. Chic McGregor says:

    @Lesley=Anne
    “FORMER social justice minister Jackie Baillie is to spearhead the opposition attack on the SNP Government in the forthcoming Holyrood election campaign.”

    Baillie probably did more to erode Labour’s credibility than any other Slabber. and that is some achievement.

    Reply
  142. Tam Jardine says:

    Sorry for derailing the thread somewhat but there is only so much to say about Michael Kelly

    Reply
  143. caledonia says:

    ha ha their biggest problem now is they have lied as much during the referendum that even if the snp do fail on something like the police no one is going to believe them

    Its their own bloody fault all people who cried wolf

    Reply
  144. Tam Jardine says:

    Robert Kerr

    That isn’t the case from what I’ve read. Take a look at the Wikipedia entry – there’s a list of aircraft it is designed for, planes and choppers

    Reply
  145. Lesley-Anne says:

    Tam Jardine says:

    Lesley-Anne

    CBG? Who ARE you?

    Sorry Tam … I just couldn’t be bothered writing out Combat Battle Group out in full … AGAIN! 😀

    As for who I am … well I could tell you … but then I’d have to kill you! 😀

    To be fair Robert I believe the QE2 carriers could launch a Harrier type aircraft if only WE had some. I wonder whatever happened to all those Harriers we once had … oh that’s right some bozzo P.M. sold the whole kit and caboodle, including ALL the spares, to … the U.S. Marines at a KNOCKDOWN price! 😀

    I have to admit Chic good old Kezia has some real dooby doo’s in her *ahem* NEW *cough* OLD front bench team. What can I say except FMQ’s is going to be a real joy to watch. Make sure you are well stocked up with pop corn and cold drinks every Thursday folks! 😀

    Reply
  146. @Robert Kerr says:

    The question that must be asked is why the QE2 class carriers can only fly the F35B, a variant of one aircraft from one manufacturer? Nothing else.

    Propulsion of take off systems electric or rubber bands.

    Reply
  147. Onwards says:

    Maybe that’s Labour’s election slogan for next year:

    “Hey morons, Have you come to your senses yet?”

    Reply
  148. Robert Kerr says:

    Yes, harriers no more. USMC has them all.

    How about choppers versus Sukhoi Su-35s?

    I stand by my statement. There is only the F35-B that can use the carriers.

    The F35-B has only one real customer. The USMC. A legacy of Guadacanal!

    Reply
  149. Fred says:

    Just watched the profile of Brian Wilson on Alba, if all political careers are doomed to failure it’s certainly true of Wilson. Rejected repeatedly by the people of the west coast, who he identified with, he found a safe Ayrshire seat but it was a case of “Smart Boy Wanted, but not too Smart”. For a man whose favourite words are I, Me & My it was difficult to make common cause with anybody. Labour back-stabbery & factionalism (sounds familiar) saw Oor Brian hit the glass ceiling and the retired socialist now concentrates on laying expensive tweed on the backs of the rich rather than clothing the poor.

    A full supporting cast of clapped-out Unionist has-beens, Crichton, Galloway, Forsyth, Darling & Alexander contributed to this rather strange exercise in failure. It was almost an obituary. Needless to say, the elephant in the room, the SNP, were not consulted.

    Reply
  150. HandandShrimp says:

    Maybe that’s Labour’s election slogan for next year:

    “Hey morons, Have you come to your senses yet?”

    A John McTernan classic if ever I saw one

    🙂

    Reply
  151. Tam Jardine says:

    Robert Kerr

    Sorry Robert I read that entry again and you are right on that. A bizarre business. And like I say there is an article to be written on this but mibbe by one of our many Wingers expert in this field.

    Reply
  152. @Lesley-Anne

    Regarding the need for behemoth Aircraft Carriers,whatever happened to the technology behind the vertical take off Harrier Jump Jet.

    Instead of two massive sitting ducks you could have more smaller faster frigates that could each carry vertical take off fighter jets and various helicopters.

    You could have maybe eight jet carrying frigates for the price of two Carriers with runways.

    The MOD seems to be gearing up for 20th century wars in the 21st century.

    Reply
  153. Dr Jim says:

    Michelle Thompson’s coming in for the usual Britnat vile filthy abuse on the web tonight over this dating web site thing that she was never a part of

    Bile pouring out of folk who haven’t even heard of her just because she’s one of ours, needless to say they manage to work in the First Ministers name into as well

    I wont even link it but it’s the Guardian of course

    Reply
  154. FergusMac says:

    I am sure, Michael, that your ancestors are so proud of you for aligning yourself so closely with the Orange Order and the state that sent the Black and Tans into Ireland.

    Reply
  155. smithie says:

    The F-35B, never mind the software problem which is huge and may never be resolved, there’s this.
    link to archive.is

    Reply
  156. Effijy says:

    We have Blair, Brown, and now Blunket all decrying Corbyn, their duly elected Fellow Labour Party Member.

    We also have all three leadership candidates demonising Corbyn.

    Every branch of the UK’s corrupt media ridicule Corbyn.

    The Tory party cock a snoot at Corbyn.

    You just know that you have got to vote for Corbyn if his politics are diametrically opposite these sycophantic gangsters.

    Just for good measure we have Lord Loser Kinock and his Jobs for all the family scheme telling Labour how to win?

    Surely every one of these anti-democratic bullies must sever all ties with the real Labour Party, if Corbyn wins?

    If Corbyn doesn’t win, surely he, his fellow MP supporters and their Trade Union supporters must sever all ties with New Red Tory Labour?

    Reply
  157. call me dave says:

    The Glasgow contenders waiting in the wings.

    link to archive.is

    How the hairy Leftie went from rank outsider to odds-on favourite and what it means for Scotland

    link to archive.is

    Reply
  158. Grouse Beater says:

    Fred said: “Just watched the profile of Brian Wilson on Alba

    Excellent post. 🙂

    The new blacklist: ‘Are you now, or have you ever been, a socialist’

    link to grousebeater.wordpress.com

    Reply
  159. Tackety Beets says:

    Heedtracker @ 8.02 pm

    That Naughty link should have a health warninig .
    Thats a bloody awful interview .
    Naughty , the coupon a mither wid slap !
    On a +ve Angela Constance ,to her credit , was very good at holding steady.

    Ian Murray link , yuk , couldna look.

    Nochty’s Book , it will soon be in the Dump Bins @ £3 along with Federal Broon’s

    Just been viewing a few other sites tonight , seams like trouble@mill , ASDA feeling the heat .
    Sounds like loads of folk, inc me , still boycotting .

    I’m really starting to think the “YES” movement as such has indeed had a massive effect on a lot more than Labour Politicians.

    Well done to you all .

    Reply
  160. Lesley-Anne says:

    The problem you have Scot with the suggestion about flying Harrier type aircraft off the decks of Frigates is that to do so does tend to severely limit the aircraft’s range and/or capabilities. This is why when WE had Harriers they never took off vertically, they always used the Ski Ramp.

    The problem is, as it has always been, getting the aircraft airborne. Once they are airborne then things get easier, allegedly.

    In order for any fixed wing jet fighter to be effective then it really needs as much fuel as possible with as much stores as possible. This can only be achieved either from a fixed runway or a Ski Ramped carrier.

    Reply
  161. Ian Brotherhood says:

    Many words spring to mind when Jackie Baillie is mentioned. For most people, ‘spearhead’ is not one of them.

    Never mind. Good luck to her in her ‘new’ post, and to all her colleagues. Credit where it’s due, eh? – they’ve done well to survive the veritable tsunami of young and ambitious talent clamouring to join Labour’s North Britain outlet.

    Reply
  162. K1 says:

    LA, yer soundin’ less and less like the village idiot…(ah knew it wiz aw a ruse 😉 )

    Reply
  163. Alan Mackintosh says:

    Tam, a resume of the F35 from the designer of the A10 (warthog) and the F16 (Falcon) Pierre Sprey with the reasons behind its inception.

    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  164. potter says:

    Glesga Labour,you go to love them
    link to corruptglasgow2014.com

    Reply
  165. Lesley-Anne says:

    K1 says:

    LA, yer soundin’ less and less like the village idiot…(ah knew it wiz aw a ruse 😉 )

    Wheest K1. Do you want everyone to know my wee *ahem* secret? 😉

    Oh wait a minute it’s not you … it’s me. Think I’ll shut up and crawl back under my wee cozy stone. 😀

    Reply
  166. CameronB Brodie says:

    Does this interview support the theory that although we all share the same umwelt (the environment in it’s broadest sense), we all inhabit our own individual umwelten (environments/bubbles)? I think it does.

    We may share the same locality in time and space, yet perceive a vastly divergent reality to one another. I’m beginning to wonder if Mr. Kelly might be dyslexic or such, so is unable to intemperate the signposts in front of him. Either that, or has he completely distanced himself from reality and doitered up the wrang dreel? 🙂

    Reply
  167. Scotspine says:

    @Tam Jardine

    Re Wikipedia entry on QE2 class carriers.

    The only fixed wing aircraft the carriers can fly is the F35b variant.

    This variant requires the ramp at the end of the deck to aid take off for the short take off F35b.

    The UK Govt initially decided on f35b variant, then realised that it can’t carry much of the internal payload that gives the conventional variant its stealth characteristics.

    They changed their minds in favour of conventional f35 variants, but realised that in order to fly a conventional f35 off the deck, they would need steam powered catapults.

    The carriers were by now way over budget and it was going to cost another billion per carrier to install some kind of catapult, so they decided to go back to f35b with the ramp at the end of the deck.

    This, despite the US going on record to say they would share the new catapult design they are fitting to their carriers….and bear a lot of the cost.

    So, the RAF\Fleet Air Arm are now stuck with an aircraft that can carry less, has a lesser range and is less stealthy. Oh, and the f35b is more expensive than conventional f35.

    The carriers are designed as strike carriers for strike aircraft to carry out operations from. The other helicopters you see listed on Wikipedia are support aircraft for carrying troops and doing anti sub patrols round the carriers to protect them (aside from the Apache helicopters, which are of course slow flying helicopter gunships)

    By the way, the US have also gone on record stating that UK would be better off spending defence money on conventional armaments rather than nukes.

    In short, UK govts are desperate to sit at the top table in military terms on a shoestring budget. It’s all smoke and mirrors.

    Reply
  168. scotspine says:

    Oh, and sorry to sound like such an anorak.

    Reply
  169. Lesley-Anne says:

    scotspine says:

    Oh, and sorry to sound like such an anorak.

    No need to apologise about being an anorak SP anoraks are useful don’t you realise it is raining outside?

    Oops … sorry … wrong type of anorak! 😀

    Reply
  170. smithie says:

    Ach Scotspine you’re only an anorak if you’ve got the hood pulled up, dinnae fash yersel

    Reply
  171. Legerwood says:

    This discussion about aircraft for the carriers is all very interesting but surely the major problem with the carriers is that the RN does not have enough surface ships to protect them. The carriers are sitting ducks without frigates, destroyers etc. to protect them.

    The RN does not have enough ships to protect the UK’s coastline let alone form two carrier groups.

    This issue was covered in a CH4 Despatches programme some months ago and the lack of surface ships to protect the carriers was one of the issues raised with no apparent solution other than the suggestion that if the carriers were required to go into action the UK might be able to ‘hure’ ships from some other countries. I am not sure if they were being serious with that idea.

    Reply
  172. heedtracker says:

    Tackety Beets says:
    19 August, 2015 at 11:24 pm
    Heedtracker @ 8.02 pm

    On a +ve Angela Constance ,to her credit , was very good at holding steady.

    They can say what they like about the SNP but they certainly have Zen like powers of patience with twerps like Naughty. If his book, The Madness of July is a bad as his title, we’re all fcuked/voting SLab.

    Only BBC sized egos could think anyone would go for The Madness of July, right up there with one of the greatest novels ever written, Faster Than the Speed of Love, by Brian Griffin. JK Rowling must be green with envy.

    Reply
  173. scotspine says:

    Aye, walked the dog in it earlier and found the waterproofing has gone!

    Reply
  174. Hazel Lewry says:

    The voters have got it wrong; is that like the wrong kind of leaves on the rail tracks?

    Reply
  175. smithie says:

    A floating football pitch? how big a target is that? one missile-SUNK

    Reply
  176. Scotspine says:

    @legerwood.

    Indeed. The number of destroyers on order were reduced and there is a lot of debate ongoing whether the pending order for 13 replacement type 26 will be reduced too.

    The only RN ships regularly in Scottish waters (subs aside) are unarmed fishery protection patrol boats (not actually RN) or the unarmed small cabin cruiser type training patrol boats used by university naval cadet types and the RN reserve.

    Reply
  177. heedtracker says:

    link to theguardian.com

    Libby Carrell of rancid The Graun back from hols. If Scotland’s oil so worthless, hand it all back to Scotland teamGB, pretty please, with ribbons on, dear imperial masters.

    Reply
  178. K1 says:

    Right enough Hazel, where are they gonnae find aw the ‘right’ voters to replace aw the ‘left’ wans…oops I mean ‘wrong’ voters! 😉

    Reply
  179. Lesley-Anne says:

    smithie says:
    A floating football pitch? how big a target is that? one missile-SUNK

    So true Smithie now if onlywe could find out who might have a suitable missile … oh that’s right WE do … Coulport and Faslane any one? 😀

    Reply
  180. Rob James says:

    If there’s one thing that pisses off the electorate, it’s being told that they are thick, but the likes of Kelly and the rest of the labour eejits are so far up their own arseholes that they assume that they know best. As their coffin is lowered into the ground, I’m sure we shall hear the fading cries, “We’ll listen next time.”

    Sorry labour, there will be no next time. It’s over, finito. Even with wall to wall coverage from BBC Scotlab, the ‘new’ shadow cabinet will continue to utter the same mince as before. They just can’t seem to recognise that only having the one policy (SNP Bad) doesn’t appear to cut it with the thick electorate.

    Re the Aircraft Carrier. I had the fortune,(or misfortune) to be present when Betty and Phil popped by Rosyth to name our governments new toy. I was extremely annoyed when Alec Salmond was booed by sections of the workforce, whose jobs would have been under threat had we voted for Independence. (or so they were informed by Babcock) How pleasing it is that many of them are to be replaced by Polish workers. Must be something to do with that pooling and sharing.

    As some have already pointed out, the F35B’s (Four of them) will be available 2020 at the earliest. The aircraft is crap. Easily outmanoeuvred, short on range and with a reduced payload, it can hardly be described as state of the art. Oh, and just one other thing, we don’t have any pilots.

    Talking of pooling and sharing, it would appear that the government has arranged a funding package to the tune of £1.34million to facilitate the removal of jobs from Fraserburgh to Young’s premises in Grimsby. It appears that they may have breached EU aid rules, which do not permit the funding of private companies.

    The term fresh fish takes on a new meaning after a 400 mile road journey, unless of course they plan to land the catches directly at Grimsby, but that would also breach EU law, and they need our fish. Perhaps we should set up a company in direct competition, owned and based in Scotland.

    It’s high time we started playing them at their own game. We need a central bank, our own electricity grid (and we’ll charge them accordingly for the power we supply) and a competitive direct RoRo link to the continent, not forgetting our own independent broadcaster.

    This deliberate attack on our economy will be their downfall.

    Reply
  181. Lesley-Anne says:

    Just so we are clear regarding the *ahem* massive size of the Royal Navy here is a wee snippet from Wiki detailing the breakdown of the surface/sub surface fleet that is currently commissioned. 😉

    The Royal Navy is the principal naval warfare service branch of the British Armed Forces. As of 1 August 2015, there are 76 commissioned ships in the Royal Navy. 19 of the commissioned vessels are major surface combatants (six guided missile destroyers and 13 frigates) and 10 are nuclear-powered submarines (four ballistic missile submarines and six fleet submarines). In addition the Navy possesses a landing platform helicopter, two amphibious transport docks, 15 mine countermeasures vessels, 22 patrol vessels, four survey vessels, one icebreaker and two historic warships (Victory and Bristol).

    link to en.wikipedia.org

    I’m thinking that H.M.S. Victory and H.M.S. Bristol may yet be re-commissioned any day now. 😀

    Reply
  182. Scotspine says:

    With you 100% Rob James.

    Jobs going at Fraserburgh to make way for new jobs doing the same work in Grimsby.

    Power stations being closed in Scotland because the subsidies paid to generating companies nearer to SE England make Scots ones non viable.

    Daily attacks on Scottish public services (NHS, Schools, Police) through the Unionist media.

    The only nugget of comfort I take from your post is the hope that it was those who booed Alex Salmond who lost their jobs.

    Its about time some of these pricks at BBC Scotregion lost their jobs.

    Reply
  183. smithie says:

    Rule Britannia if only we can get the aircraft aligned to the ships then what a killing machine we could have, then we would demand some respect (What?) Yea right.

    Reply
  184. Scotspine says:

    @ Lesley-Anne

    As some disgruntled fellow I once knew said:

    “At this rate, the navy will soon consist of three rubber dinghys and a marching band”.

    Meanwhile, here in Scotland. We don’t even have a marching band.

    Reply
  185. call me dave says:

    Seems the Herald is not scared off by the recent threats issued by M. Mone. It pursues her Wiki page changes.

    link to archive.is

    Money Money Money. Hey that’s close to Mone above but not connected. 🙂
    link to archive.is

    Reply
  186. call me dave says:

    @Rob James

    Bravo! I agree with all that.

    Reply
  187. Dal Riata says:

    Once upon a time, in a galaxy far away… the Guardian used to be my regular go-to online for news, sport, opinion pieces, etc. That was before the SNP won by a majority the right to form the Scottish government in Holyrood…

    From that time onward, as the Guardian became ever more hostile to Scotland, as an entity in itself, never mind Scottish independence, it didn’t take long to realise I’d been hoodwinked, made a fool of, cheated.

    You see, I’d naively believed that the Guardian was, and its editor and writers were, as they themselves still claim to be, “left-leaning”…

    What a fool was I.

    Their being a willing part of the Better Together scam enacted upon the people of Scotland exposed them as being just one more of the British state’s right-wing propaganda outlets.

    To the present.

    The Guardian is now blatantly right-wing. Oh, it can’t bring itself to go full-fat Tory – yet – but they’ll say ‘Vote Lib Dem!’, or ‘Vote Labour!’ (as long as they stay Blairites and Tory-lite) to salve their comfortably-off, English middle-class, Oxbridge educated consciousness, but their underlying right-wing beliefs are coming ever more to the fore.

    See their increasingly biased articles and editorials against the SNP and the Scottish government. See them giving discredited Labour henchmen lots of space to spew their lies and smears. See them getting more desperate by the day to smear the left-winger Jeremy Corbyn.

    And then there is today’s disgrace, where the Guardian (and the racist Daily Mail) has decided that of all the many thousands of names on a hacked dating website, SNP MP Michelle Thompson’s is the one they must highlight on their website. It is not even certain whether she was or wasn’t using the website, or whether her e.mail address was compromised, yet they have gone ahead with a smear article and a smear “married SNP MP” headline. And, of course, open for comments, allowing the haters and trolls to pour out their bile BTL.

    So then, when you think there are no more sharks to jump the Guardian outdo themselves once again.

    The Guardian, a newspaper/website I used to have some respect for? Not now. Fuck the Guardian. They are now no better than any of the downmarket, gutter-dwelling red-tops. Fuck them and their pseudo-intellectual, up-their-own-arses aren’t we so right-on bullshit. Fuck them and their liberal lefty pretence, while being hardcore UKOK unionists in reality. Fuck them and their Scottish independence, the SNP, Scottish culture, Scotland in general – BAD; Britnats R-Us, Westminster, the British Establishment, God Save the Queen – GOOD!…..

    Coz I’m done with it… and them.

    Reply
  188. Lesley-Anne says:

    Scotspine says:

    @ Lesley-Anne

    As some disgruntled fellow I once knew said:

    “At this rate, the navy will soon consist of three rubber dinghys and a marching band”.

    Meanwhile, here in Scotland. We don’t even have a marching band.

    😀

    I somehow think we are actually slightly better off SP … WE have Scottish fishermen and having watched many a T.V. programme about OUR fantastic fishermen I would NEVER go up against any of them … so gimme £500 on the fishermen! 😀

    Reply
  189. GrahamB says:

    Just back from Scandinavia and ma heid’s nippin’.
    Started with McTernan while sitting in Helsinki Airport then on to Kelly (Michael then Jamesy) at Stockholm and when I get home it’s all about aircraft carriers!
    Do we really need to bother about these balloons, is anybody listening to them, does Wings give them the oxygen they crave if the DR and BBC forget them?
    Took Tom Devine’s book (The Scottish Nation) with me on holiday as I’ve had it for a while and never got round to more than dipping in to it but got through a fair chunk of the early part of it covering the times prior to and following the Union and was amazed at the similarities he describes of the shennanigans among the aristocracy and the anti-Jock sentiments then and just recently.
    Anyway it was great, but expensive, to get some insight into how Scandinavia, that a lot of us aspire to, go about their social democratic agenda – not perfect but *considerably* better than our current ‘blame the poor for the bankers’ and NewLabour’s mistakes’ agenda being gleefully promoted by the Tories.

    Reply
  190. EddieMunster says:

    Talking about aircraft, the Indian Air Force and the RAF recently took part in training exercises.

    The IAR in dogfight training, shot down all RAF aircraft, with no loses.

    The IAF fly russian built aircraft.

    Reply
  191. Dal Riata says:

    @heedtracker at 12:43 am

    “Libby Carrell of rancid The Graun back from hols. If Scotland’s oil so worthless, hand it all back to Scotland teamGB, pretty please, with ribbons on, dear imperial masters.”

    Berzactly!

    Isn’t that Libby Carrell ‘farticle’ just another example of the scorched-earth verbal diarrhea he/she/they used to vomit out day after day after day during the independence campaign?

    Dearie, dearie me, that’s just so 2014!

    Oh, but wait a minute… Wasn’t that useless Scottish sludge suddenly black gold that helped the UKOK Britnats R-Us economy grow by 1.something % (cannae mind the exact figure)…?

    Scottish oil, worthless. Britnats R-Us oil, priceless.

    Another lovebomb from Better Together: ‘What’s yours is ours, and what’s ours you’re not getting it, GTF!’

    Reply
  192. Lesley-Anne says:

    EddieMunster says:

    Talking about aircraft, the Indian Air Force and the RAF recently took part in training exercises.

    The IAR in dogfight training, shot down all RAF aircraft, with no loses.

    The IAF fly russian built aircraft.

    WHIT?

    WE give India £ millions in aid every year and THEY have the damned audacity to shoot down OUR magnificent men in their flying machines by their even more magnificent, apparently 😉 , men in their flying machines. Well that just is not cricket (whatever that is 😉 ) 😀

    Reply
  193. Jim says:

    Jeremy Corbyn is there to counteract the SNP and to give credence to the illusion of an opposition which has never existed in my lifetime.

    Do not be fooled; they are giving you what they think you want, you have been warned!

    Reply
  194. Jim says:

    EddieMunster says:
    20 August, 2015 at 1:55 am

    Talking about aircraft, the Indian Air Force and the RAF recently took part in training exercises.

    The IAR in dogfight training, shot down all RAF aircraft, with no loses.

    The IAF fly russian built aircraft.
    ___________________
    Aviation experts also pointed to an exercise when RAF fighters decimated the ranks of the visiting IAF pilots, prompting the then Air Chief Marshal of the RAF, Stephen Dalton, to comment: “Well, they lost.”
    _______

    The moral of the story; do not believe everything you read.

    Reply
  195. john king says:

    Commander Lesley-Anne says
    “Sorry Tam … I just couldn’t be bothered writing out Combat Battle Group out in full … AGAIN! :D”

    Eh?
    Carrier Strike Group surely commander?
    A bit behind the times aren’t we C.A.G.?

    This aint the gulf of Tonkin, this aint the USS Franklin D Roosevelt and this aint Vietnam 1968 sailor! 🙂
    ___________________________________________________________
    Lesley-Anne (again) 🙂
    “Make sure you are well stocked up with pop corn and cold drinks every Thursday folks! :D”

    Ive got my season ticket for the front and middle row in the public gallery in the chamber! 🙂
    ____________________________________________________________
    Tackety Beets says
    “Just been viewing a few other sites tonight , seams like trouble@mill , ASDA feeling the heat .
    Sounds like loads of folk, inc me , still boycotting .”

    Hahahaha
    The only reason the wife and I go into ASDA now is to wait for the security alarms to go off (about once every three minutes) and tell the poor idiot it has embarrassed that we don’t go in there any more for that very reason, and point is its because their staff are so poorly trained they cant be arsed to deactivate/remove security tags!
    ____________________________________________________________
    Ian Brotherhood says
    “Never mind. Good luck to her in her ‘new’ post, and to all her colleagues. Credit where it’s due, eh? – they’ve done well to survive the veritable tsunami of young and ambitious talent clamouring to join Labour’s North Britain outlet.”

    Oooh thats gonna leave a mark, ouch. 🙂
    ____________________________________________________________
    Scotspine says
    “Oh, and sorry to sound like such an anorak.”

    Whats that on your top lip?
    Either its a milk moustache or you’ve been getting just a little TOO friendly with Gideon Osbourne. 🙂
    ______________________________________________________________
    Legerwood says
    “months ago and the lack of surface ships to protect the carriers was one of the issues raised with no apparent solution other than the suggestion that if the carriers were required to go into action the UK might be able to ‘hure’ ships from some other countries. I am not sure if they were being serious with that idea.”

    Amount of surface ships (capable of defending an aircraft
    carrier)in the Royal Navy):

    Over the course of the 1990s and the 2000s, the navy began series of projects to improve its fleet, with a view to providing enhanced capabilities, although many programmes were reduced in scale. This has led to the replacement of smaller and more numerous units with fewer, but larger, units. The main examples of this are the replacement of thirteen Type 42 destroyers with six Type 45s and the replacement of the three 20,000 tonne Invincible-class aircraft carriers with two operational 65,000 tonne Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers.

    So six type 45s that’s it!
    6 ships capable of defending those two carriers never mind the duties that the current 13 type 42’s have to carry out just now which has them stretched to breaking point and the carriers aren’t EVEN in service yet!

    Oh and before I forget there are about 40 admirals in the royal navy that’s about 5 for every ship. I would put a smiley but that’s REALLY not funny!

    ps have a look at just how many ships were in the carrier group that sailed to the Falklands
    link to en.wikipedia.org
    admittedly a great many of the ships were there to form part of the assault group but the carrier screen was massive in contrast!

    heres a picture of the home fleet in 1953
    link to tinyurl.com
    _____________________________________________________________
    @Hazel Lewry
    As long as the Weegie Warbler is still here all is right with the world,
    Keep on truckin Hazel 🙂

    Reply
  196. AndyH says:

    People should start phoning in to BBC radio Scotland’s Morning calls on a daily basis regardless of the topic just to get in the Bias points.

    Radio crash their show as a form of protest!

    Let them know what the people are really thinking and stick a spanner in the cogs of the propaganda machine.

    Reply
  197. Tam Jardine says:

    john king

    Amazing how the Royal Navy has contracted during that period. What’s the solution? Replace the nuclear submarines at breathtaking expense.

    The SNP were panned during the indyref for putting forward the notion of a Scottish defence force with navy, army and airforce as if such a notion was absurd. Cringe was set to maximum… All very white heather club.

    And yet it strikes me that a small country building modern armed forces to suit our purpose of defending our territory and assisting allies/UN other countries when necessary is not ridiculous at all.

    40 admirals just about sums it up. We had the chance to start from scratch (with our share of resources from the current armed forces) and create something that suited Scotland instead of attempting to project empire without actually having an empire.

    Defence has been viewed as a strength by unionists in the debate but I think it is an area where we can really attack seeing as we’re stuck with this delusional imperial baggage which is clearly affecting the decision making process.

    This is what I love about Wings by the way John – Reading informed posts about defence procurement on a thread about some labour dough ball telling the Scottish voters they are stupid for voting SNP

    Reply
  198. Joemcg says:

    I’m certain this Kelly character has written some humdinger loony tune columns for newspapers in the past so anything he says should not be given credence. Further to other posters comments, that really is a strange phenomenon indigineous to mainly west coasters the peculiar Irish Nationalist/ Republican/ Brit Nat Scot. They are legion too. Maybe someone can explain the reasoning and thinking behind it as it’s a total contradiction. Hypocrisy world champs.

    Reply
  199. Macart says:

    Wee Ginger Dug getting tore in aboot IDS in today’s National.

    Its a beezer. 🙂

    Reply
  200. Macart says:

    @Fiona 4.36pm

    Absolutely right on the nail Fiona.

    Very well put and very well said.

    Reply
  201. galamcennalath says:

    The new carriers might end up like the do call nuclear deterrent – neither being about to be operated independently but only with the cooperation of other countries.

    The carriers may only be sensibly deployed as part of a larger NATO group.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if any ideas of the UK being able to put together a small independent battle group is just a pipe dream.

    Reply
  202. Tinto Chiel says:

    “It’s high time we started playing them at their own game. We need a central bank, our own electricity grid (and we’ll charge them accordingly for the power we supply) and a competitive direct RoRo link to the continent, not forgetting our own independent broadcaster.

    This deliberate attack on our economy will be their downfall.”

    Well said, Rob James, a great shopping list.

    And Dal Riata, your thoughts on The Grauniad chime exactly with mine. The mask has slipped to reveal the viscerally anti-Scottish attitudes which it holds. Even George Monbiot seems be out of touch now with Scottish affairs. What do groovy, organic quinoa-munching Modern Studies teachers read now? Hope it’s The National, for all its faults.

    The attack on Michelle Thompson, a charming woman and very articulate speaker, is transparently an attack on the SNP too. She is not alone of course, Radio 4 dutifully continuing the anti-Semite smears against Corby Baby this morning. What a wonderful institution the British Brainwashing Corporation is, and a snip at £145 a year.

    Reply
  203. fletch49er says:

    On that basis, Mr Kelly’s rhetoric could be applied to every Labour voter in Scotland for the past 50 years?

    Reply
  204. Legerwood says:

    John King @ 6.49 am

    Thank you for all the details about the ships – or lack thereof – to form a protective shield – or not – for the carriers.

    Reply
  205. Glamaig says:

    What do groovy, organic quinoa-munching Modern Studies teachers read now? Hope it’s The National, for all its faults.

    My sister, a lifelong organic knitting and leftie Gruaniad reader, has start reading the National! So theres some progress.

    @Fiona 4.36pm
    As others have said that’s a classic post. Some day when I have the time it would be good to trawl through the archives and put together a collection of outstanding posts, and there are loads.

    Reply
  206. Muscleguy says:

    @Fiona

    “Those of us who want to live in a social democracy have been abandoned by the labour party. They no longer share that aspiration in principle or in practice. Only the SNP currently represents that strand in our electorate.”

    Not strictly true, the Greens are Social Democrats too and the SLP are as well, just with a bit more oomph to it. How SLAB should be.

    Reply
  207. Big Jock says:

    Does anyone suspet the non story about the SNP mp and the adultary website. Was placed on the BBC to create distortion and then report the facts later on. They go on to say that 100’s of MP’s emails have been hacked.

    But they choose to report the SNP one!

    This is project smear all over again. At the end of the day even if it were true is it anyones business. Is it newsworthy.

    Reply
  208. call me dave says:

    Overheard on GMS “But Mr Gray, surely labour had 50 years to close the gap”

    The answer was lost in translation as I stepped into the shower and applied the soapy stuff to my ears.
    Good old labour, same every day.

    Reply
  209. Craig P says:

    Legerwood – I’m not going to defend UK defence policy, but numbers of boats aren’t everything – for example, the latest frigates (Type 45) have more anti-aircraft capability each than the entire 1982 Falklands fleet, whereas Argentina has not modernised its airforce to nearly the same extent.

    The number of UK admirals in relation to the size of the navy is ridiculous though.

    Reply
  210. NN says:

    At their heart these short sighted types of commentators are not true believers in democracy at their core. They only tolerate it as long as you obey or vote as they think you should. They’d much rather go back to the days of feudalism where they could tell you peasants what to do and think. Self serving to the core and lacking any evidence to back up their case.

    Thier inner belief comes bubbling up in the form of this sort of absurd gibberish about cults and mass brainwashing across a country (something repeated over and over again by several of their kind), all because people didn’t do what they “ought” to have done if they listened to their column-writing “betters”. There’s no reasonable evidence or case made, they simply repeat the same sort of nonsense we’ve heard for months or longer, sharing hymn sheets when they get stuck for the words to the song.

    Reply
  211. ronnie anderson says:

    Spearheid Jackie Baillie noo there,s ah vision tae conjure wie,wull that no lit awe the wind oota her.

    Reply
  212. heedtracker says:

    My sister, a lifelong organic knitting and leftie Gruaniad reader, has start reading the National! So theres some progress.

    My English teacher at my bog standard comp in Aberdeen always said read all the broadsheets, all the time.

    Last night, rancid The Graun broke major shock news that Scotland has no oil left, this which we did not know, thank the Lord Scotland is still controlled by England, rejoice, give thanks to a bountiful Union.

    And Ofcourse rancid olde Graun in conjunction with the daily Heil go massive on SNP MP exposed as an adulteress. You can just feel them getting it nastier and creepier, day by UKOK day.

    At least the BBC have a bit more class than rancid Graun, if only.

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Another day of how the great noble British media smears Scottish democracy.

    Thanks again proud Scot buts.

    Reply
  213. So Kelly and Lamont are in the same camp – we are all too thick / too stupid / too wee / not programmed properly etc. etc. Ah well I for one can live with the name calling just so long as at the end of the day we get to run our own country and the SNP get to run Glasgow council – Hail Alba

    Reply
  214. Grouse Beater says:

    “The attack on Michelle Thompson, a charming woman and very articulate speaker, is transparently an attack on the SNP too”

    Was only a matter of time somebody in GCHQ would construct a smear on an SNP MP. Marvel why Corbyn isn’t included – oh wait! They have him an ‘anti-Semite’.

    They began their SNP attack on Sturgeon – remember?

    Anybody observing Thompson last two years saw a woman with barely a minute to visit the toilet let alone nip off to the Bahamas for an illicit affair between canvassing, domestic duties, and now full-time MP. Sheesh.

    Reply
  215. Freedom Lover says:

    It is kinda funny listening-watching all these arrogant pin-head unionists swivel & swithering like crazy upon untenable points of rationalization & excessive over-compensation. Its comical. Kelly et al are all just thinking in crude stereotypes & unexamined assumptions- they see imaginary demons of their own projection everywhere they look & accusing their opponents of shortcomings that they pathologically suffer from. If Kelly wasn’t so obnoxious you would have to pity his pathetic state of mind. But the likes of Kelly, Wilson, Baillie etc are unredeemable; I believe they have sold themselves long ago & are now in a soulless state of rigid automatism that condemns them to repeat the same malicious reactionary soundbites over & over. Its kinda sad, really. They’re playing an old tune the world no longer hears as the world has moved on- the really depressing aspect of it is how the likes of the BBC still give obsolete relics like Kelly or McTiernan oxygen to parrot the fossilized reactionary slogans as if it was prescient social commentary.

    Reply
  216. Gordon McAllan says:

    Ther is a long-overdue need for a full, headlights-on, rigorous investigation of the past 50 years of local government incompetence, mismanagement, nepotism and preferment, and the influence of vested interest on personal and group-political status. I’m sure that these two gentlemen would encourage such an enquiry.

    In the absence, meantime, of any such institutional enquiry, where are our finest, truly-investigative journalists? We need you now.

    The anthem of the New Scottish Enlightenment should be The Who’s “Won’t get Fooled Again”.

    Reply
  217. handclapping says:

    Their world is falling apart; now money isn’t everything! Run up to GE15, UKIP gets £2mil+ SNP £10,000 SNP gets 56 seats UKIP 1

    Reply
  218. handclapping says:

    The Edstone probably cost more than £10,000! 😀

    Reply
  219. NN @1021am.
    The only mass brainwashing that has been done is by the Westminster establishment over the past three hundred years. Aided of course by their pet poodle, our main enemy, the M.S.M.

    Reply
  220. heedtracker says:

    “The attack on Michelle Thompson, a charming woman and very articulate speaker, is transparently an attack on the SNP too”

    Just google, “MP Ashely Madison” specifically leavIng out Michelle Thompson and there’s already hundreds of UKOK press stories smearing away at Thompson, like only the malice dripping creeps we have come to feel nauseous each time they slime in.

    So top of Google list here, Daily Heil, then rancid Graun, then BBC, the. independent, viewers in other search engines may find differing results . MSN yahoo, exact same as Google. UKOK tricks mob really getting going now.

    The question really is the overall electoral effectiveness of UKOK fraudsters like the BBC, the Guardian, the independent and the Mail, in Scotland now and for the next five years.

    Reply
  221. Brian Powell says:

    heedtracker

    Then we compare to Chilcott Report into Iraq war. 6 years and £10million cost for the ‘report’ and no one is going to be named.

    Reply
  222. Rob James says:

    Craig P @ 10:11

    In the early 1990’s, shortly after the demise of the Soviet Union, the Russian Destroyer ‘Sovremenny’ docked in the Solent. Contrary to previous propaganda by the UK MOD, it was discovered that every crew member was at least bilingual, and was capable of performing several jobs to a very high standard. This would have been a tremendous advantage in a war situation, should certain personnel have been wounded or killed. This ability to rotate would have allowed the ship to continue to function as normally as possible, unlike the Royal Navy, who would have become sitting ducks.

    Around the same time, the battle cruiser ‘Kirov’, was the most heavily armed vessel on the planet, with six different missile systems.(More than our navy had in total)

    Rear Admiral Lesley Anne

    I don’t know how you managed to submit so many comments in the time it took me to submit one. I hope you’re not pulling rank.

    Reply
  223. heedtracker says:

    BetterTogether Slovenia branch manager here explains in great excitement, just how they intend to win the next and last referendum and above all, get SNP out of office within the next 5 years at least, maybe a little longer, pending how much hard Swinney falls into his cunning UKOK fiscal PAYE bear trap-

    link to notesfromnorthbritain.wordpress.com

    “With 56 MPs and perhaps as many as 70 MSPs, this is as good as it can ever get for them. And after you’ve reached your peak, the only way is down.

    And what will bring the SNP down is their record in government. By the time of the next-but-one Holyrood election (assuming it takes place in 2021) the SNP will have been in power, continuously, for 14 years. If Scotland’s schools haven’t improved by then it will be no-one but the SNP’s fault (and, so far, Scottish education has got worse, not better, under the SNP).

    If the Scottish health service is still in the mess in 2021 that it is in now, it will be no-one but the SNP’s fault. Moreover, well before 2021 the new tax and welfare powers agreed by the Smith Commission and currently being legislated for in the Scotland Bill will be fully in force.

    Mr Swinney made a complete hash of the first tax devolved to him (stamp duty) and, when he takes charge of income tax in Scotland, which he soon will, his job will get a whole lot harder. Especially when he has a Cabinet Secretary for Welfare urging him radically to increase spending on social security provision in Scotland.”

    Just another UKOK huckster lawyer, but its all laid out here by our fellow countryman, from Kent.

    Reply
  224. chris kilby says:

    Still no word from Stu yet re: The Record backing Jeremy Corbyn? He’s probably still in shock.

    (I know how he feels. It’s a wonder Murray Foote can walk with brass balls that size. A brass neck an’ all…)

    Reply
  225. Anagach says:

    heedtracker

    “Mr Swinney made a complete hash of the first tax devolved to him (stamp duty)”

    The BetterTogether Slovenia branch manager is off his heid.

    Swinney made stamp duty progressive, neutral and rebalanced to help the poor a little and burden the rich a little.

    Then suddenly Osborne had to do the same except Osbourne then added a £ 70 million tax subsidy to undercut the levels Swinney set at.

    Funny how quick Westminster moves when people are able to see it done better.

    Reply
  226. gus1940 says:

    Here is a list of the ships in The RN in 1954 from a copy of the Ian Allan abc Of British Warships retained from my boyhood:-

    Battleships – 5
    Fleet Carriers – 7
    Light Fleet Carriers – 9
    Aircraft Ferry Carriers – 4
    Cruisers – 27
    Minelayers – 3
    Monitors – 2
    Destroyers – 95
    Fast A/S Frigates – 21
    Frigates – 161
    Ocean Minesweepers – 62
    Submarines – 55
    Fast Patrol Boats – 80
    Seaward Defence Boats – 18
    Fast Gunboats – 1
    Motor Launches – 57
    Seaward Defence Launches – 13
    Submarine Depot Ships – 4
    Destroyer Depot Ships – 2
    Heavy Repair Ships – 3
    Maintenance Ships – 11
    Fleet Auxiliaries – 8
    Radar Training and Trials Ships – 2
    Surveying Vessels – 2
    Boom Defence Vessels – 72
    Boom Working Vessels – 18
    Netlayers – 2
    Coastal Minelayers – 2
    Trawlers – 34
    Motor Minesweepers – 72
    Inshore Minesweepers – 54
    Coastal Minesweepers – 60

    Now that was a Navy.

    Reply
  227. starlaw says:

    During ww11. Westminster created a black propaganda unit nicknamed The Ministry of Disinforation. It was so successful it was kept in place fronted by BBC and GCHQ. I have been listening to foreign news for years to learn what was really going on in the world.

    Reply
  228. call me dave says:

    Kezia break BBC! We don’t deserve her, truly we don’t. 🙂

    link to archive.is

    FMQ’s next month let ‘the heartaches begin’ for those who thought Kezia was being truthful saying ‘I’m changing’ or, on reflection, Marmalade tomorrow.

    I prefer Marmalade to the Jam anyhoo!

    Who will folk trust… no contest.

    Reply
  229. K1 says:

    The only good thing to have come out of this UKLabour leader contest is the exposing of their dirty tactics in attempting to ban people from joining the party to vote for Corbyn. It seems the template letter of ‘rejection’ is being widely circulated on the twittershpere by more and more people who have been lifelong Labour voters.

    Can you imagine the uproar if the SNP were doing this? Stasi SNP headlines across the whole of UKOK media. The Labour party are walking into oblivion with this behaviour irrespective of Corbyn win.

    Patting down the electorate before letting them join, yes a core socialist ‘principle’ at work right there! Labour™

    Reply
  230. David Wardrope says:

    @ chris kilby

    Mr Foote’s brass neck will be his downfall, as he’s unable to turn his head to see DRs demise running in his direction

    Reply
  231. Glamaig says:

    First line in Prof Tomkins blog:

    This time last year I was terrified that we were about to lose our country.

    Mr Tomkins geography isn’t very good. He needs the Peffer treatment.

    Reply
  232. Big Jock says:

    K1 It kind of begs the question. Why is Corbyn even in the Labour party. They are clearly all paranoid and anti democratic.

    I expect he will win the contest and Labour will split into left and right. Clearly they will not be able to defeat the Tories with a split party.

    That’s why all this talk of yessers going back to Labour makes me laugh. Ultimately this will give the SNP more supporters as the only relevent opposition with a chance to change Scotland. Trying to change the UK is a busted flush.

    Reply
  233. gordonbrownstuff says:

    Unionists and their press corp can only cry wolf so many times before people start getting wise to the bullshit they spout ad nauseum daily. If the oil is so worthless as they say why dont they just hand back the proceeds? Think we know the answer to that…..

    Reply
  234. orri says:

    The problem isn’t that the SNP are Teflon it’s that Labour are trying to paint a whole room with a tin of non drip meant for something a whole lot smaller. So in order to do so the mix it with water and then complain that it doesn’t do what it says on the tin.

    A better analogy might be that there might actually be somethingin the mud they throw that might stick but before they give it a chance to set they throw even more so diluted with pish that it washes it of. It’s also a bit of a mugs game as they risk it all getting blown back in their face.

    If the electorate are “stupid” it’s because there’s been so much aimed at the SNP that’s turned out to be crap that we’ve simply come to adopt the attitude that Labour as simply low grade bullshit merchants who might as well be ignored.

    Reply
  235. AndyH says:

    Amen Big Jock!

    Some cannot see this though.

    Reply
  236. Robert Peffers says:

    @Glamaig says: 20 August, 2015 at 12:23 pm:

    ” … Mr Tomkins geography isn’t very good.”

    Neither is his history, maths, English or political history.

    ” … He needs the Peffer treatment.”

    Oh! Whit! He/she/it has had the Peffers treatment several times but, unlike water of the proverbial duck’s back, the treatment doesn’t run off the prof, the water soaks in much like water on a dehydrated sponge.

    In soaking up water the sponge just swells up and the water makes it very soggy. There can be fewer things worse than a soggy, self proclaimed expert, (that is one with watered down professed views).

    Reply
  237. Fiona says:

    Muscleguy says:

    Not strictly true, the Greens are Social Democrats too and the SLP are as well, just with a bit more oomph to it. How SLAB should be.

    You are correct, Muscleguy. I try to be quite accurate in what I say, but on this occasion I overstated the point I was trying to make. It is quite true that there are other parties who believe in social democracy and they have honourable platforms and honest positions which we can debate

    Dr EW is also correct in stating upthread that strong opposition at Holyrood is desirable, perhaps even necessary, as a counter to the corrosive effects of too much power. The points are related, and I accept them both

    What I will say, though, is that SNP are currently the only party which represents that strand in a truly effective way. That is not the fault of the smaller parties, from my point of view. It is rather a consequence of our voting traditions, whereby we are accustomed to the outcomes of FPTP and so expect a very few, very strong parties. I know that many will point out that Holyrood is not elected under that system, and that is important. But it is not yet embedded in the public mind, I don’t think. We are not (yet) persuaded by the actual effect of PR as seen in europe where a great many parties get a share of the seats and where the compromise referred to in my post can be less influential

    As some here will know, I am not so persuaded by PR as most independence supporters. There is an argument to be had, and I do not think it is obvious why some system of PR is necessarily better than FPTP: but I am not decided on the issue and I hope we will have that debate after independence and have it seriously.

    However we are where we are, and I believe a Holyrood in which PR worked properly would weaken the Scottish government in its dealings with a FPTP Westminster: as was clearly intended.

    For the moment, I think that a great part of the electorate who would otherwise support Greens, or SLP or even tories, understand that. They vote SNP for a variety of complex reasons, but I suspect that one of them is a clear appreciation of the value of a strong voice from one position at both Holyrood and Westminster. As ever, I think that the electorate are correct in their analysis when it comes to the big picture, and so I take issue with unionists who believe that this is the result of our failure to understand the system.

    I have no fears of the corruption of SNP in the short term: they have a clear aim and they have the wit and the discipline to further that aim using existing structures. That is an impressive achievement, and not likely to be undermined in the near future.

    Inevitably their support will fall over time, and that does not really depend entirely on their record, or even on the beh of the mainstream parties: folk get bored, to put it crudely, and that will happen. But not yet, I think.

    After independence all those other parties will emerge stronger, and there is no doubt in my mind that politics will be stronger and more engaging because there will be real choices to make. Even if we got FFA, that would be true, though less so, I believe.

    For now, and without wishing to pretend that all of those who vote SNP wish for independence (they don’t, IMO), I think SNP represents the wish for an alternative to neoliberalism which is actually achievable. While I respect those parties you mention, I do not think they do, as yet.

    I am sorry if I left the impression that I do not recognise the stance of those parties or do not value it

    Reply
  238. Legerwood says:

    Now it appears Mr Murdoch is backing Mr Corbyn.

    Reply
  239. Macart says:

    @Glamaig

    Mr Tomkins, the Scotland Offices’ expert on constitutional matters…. nuff said.

    True blue, UK right or wrong, wrap me in the flag unionist and a believer in the order of things. No logic, no reasoning, no measure of empathy will ever reach such an individual. Whatever appalling austerity policies or cuts are enacted by the Westminster government, to the likes of such a believer they will always be simply in our best interests.

    Reply
  240. DerekM says:

    Its astonishing after all that has happened they still dont get it.

    And if they think letting some arse loose on TV or radio to call us all morons or idiots is going to save them they are living in cloud cuckoo land.

    As for the other numpties that think we will all go back in the box and vote Labour again,here is the reason we will not,you had your chance we gave you decades to do something to improve Scotland no ifs or buts you failed,now we idiots plan to give the SNP that same chance.

    You can use your project fear pish all you want the end result will be your downfall as a political entity in Scotland,you have been rumbled by the electorate and we are not amused.

    tick tock

    Reply
  241. K1 says:

    Agreed Big Jock, Labour are in implosion mode, even if Corbyn does win, there will be a coup, it’s going to destroy UKLabour. As well as bolstering SNP position, it’s going to bolster the Tories too…those ‘shy’ tories won’t be shy in 2020…leading to greater majority at Westminster.

    There won’t be a ‘better together’ strategy involving Labour, left, by the time we are going for Indyref2. I’m eager to see whether SNP put it in their manifesto for 2016, in light of the developments after Labour leader contest and the fall out?

    There’s a lot to be said for capitalising on the weakness of one of the ‘establishment’s’ political ‘pillars’ collapsing internally. We can advance through that exposed flank, especially if the ‘right wing’ coup within the Labour party is successful: the direction of travel (in the UK) is going to be much less opaque to those who have stuck with Labour in the belief that they are somehow ‘oppositional’ to Tory policies.

    We have the ‘Corbyn’ effect to thank for this, I suppose, but this effect was only possible on the back of Scotland’s renewed political engagement of which the SNP are the beneficiaries in real terms of much increased support.

    There’s a lot to be positive about from an Independence point of view.

    Reply
  242. woosie says:

    Has Nicola Sturgeon got the easiest job in the world? She hasn’t been in the news for weeks, and the SNP following gets bigger every day!

    Do the likes of Kelly never learn? They tried smear and fear during indyref and it nearly kicked them in the face ( I believe only some imaginative arithmetic saved them ). They repeated it during the ge, and SNP returned 56 mp’s. They’re now trying it direct with the voters, and there can only be one response.

    They’re also rubbishing Corbyn, so much that he’s now a certainty for the leader’s job. Don’t they see that these labour passengers are so mistrusted that anyone will do the opposite to their advice – even idiots?

    Do they really not care that industries like Longannet are being strategically removed, so that, come the next, and final, referendum, Scots will look around and think “we need england, because there’s nothing up here”.

    I’m not interested in Corbyn, and I’m sure he cares less about us; still, it’s very amusing to watch these fools shoot each other in the feet.

    Reply
  243. john king says:

    Craig P says
    “Legerwood – I’m not going to defend UK defence policy, but numbers of boats aren’t everything – for example, the latest frigates (Type 45) have more anti-aircraft capability each than the entire 1982 Falklands fleet, whereas Argentina has not modernised its airforce to nearly the same extent.”

    One missile one ship sent to the bottom,
    put all you anti aircraft capability in one ship rather than a dozen isn’t the smartest thing you can do!

    Reply
  244. heedtracker says:

    Mr Tomkins geography isn’t very good. He needs the Peffer treatment.

    Prof Tomkinski co-authored historic Smith Commission fraud but he should really stand for election now. He’s not a UKOK civil servant or even a life Lord, not yet anyway. Let the electorate decide how UKOK democracy could work.

    The historic The Vow fraud begged Scotland to vote NO for devo-max and a federal UK. And Prof Tomkins is what we actually got. A spivy law lecturer from Kent and his spivy plan to destroy SNP Scots.gov, all backed up by the whole of the English media in Scotland.

    Prof Tomkins says he nearly lost his country but if his cunning plan does work out, who really suffers? Prof T’s North Britain. But that’s fine for rule britannia britnats in Scotland, anything is, just as long as England keeps control of Scotland.

    Check Prof T’s use of “force” in his North Britain blog. A UKOK hatchet man in action.

    “If the Scottish health service is still in the mess in 2021 that it is in now, it will be no-one but the SNP’s fault. Moreover, well before 2021 the new tax and welfare powers agreed by the Smith Commission and currently being legislated for in the Scotland Bill will be fully in force.

    Reply
  245. Big Jock says:

    Yes we also must remember that Corbyn is going to be the leader of a failed opposition party. He is not going to be changing anything, other than the furniture.

    The right wing Labour mp’s will not back him at Westminster. They will do what they always do and sit on their hands. The SNP and Corbyn’s lefties will try and oppose bills. Without the Labour whip Corbyn will be lucky to muster 50 of his mp’s in support.

    It is in Westiminster that the fragmentation of Labour will occur. Corbyn will be put in an untenable position and end up resigning. He will take his supporters and form a new socialist Labour party. The other Blairites will continue the Tory light policies.

    Mark my words the end is coming for Labour and Corbyn will be the key catalyst in it’s demise.

    Reply
  246. ArtyHetty says:

    Glamaig@12.23

    Re Prof Tomkins being ‘terrified’.

    I and many others were terrified we were about to lose our integrity with a no vote.

    Added to that, the thought of losing large amounts of our so called budget from westmonster and suffering the horrendous consquences of their deliberate attacks on our most vulnerable, was terrifying. It still is.

    These people do not care about anyone but themselves. The ones making the decisions about peoples’ lives, tory and labour, are the most terrifying being on the whole an incredibly cruel and uncaring
    bunch.

    Reply
  247. Dr Jim says:

    Nicola Sturgeon must act, The SNP must do something

    The Labour Party are a laugh aren’t they, for around fifty years they sold Scotland the politics of Apathy and Depression, this is your lot get on with it nothing we can do about the bad English Tories, and then we never had it so good, thing is they always did OK didn’t they

    But now, they want to talk about our country, we gave Scotland Devolution Blah Blah, heard it

    Corbyn Miliband Kinnock, whoever,……

    Tell you what I think “Show me the Money” or shut your lying Effing Mouths

    Too Little Too Late, Too Often Scotland’s been Labours ash tray left for us to empty

    In defence of the Union is it? How many times did we see workers march, strike, work to rule at the behest of Labour Union shop stewards, only to have a wee secret meeting and then say OK boys that’s it sorted, back to work because everything’s going to be fine now

    How often was it fine then?
    That must mean it’s fine now eh?

    I really don’t like being Englands fag end

    This isn’t about Mr and Mrs English person they don’t have a clue because they’re sold the same lies in reverse
    even the posh ones sipping their Gin and Tonic of which BTW 70% of is made in Effing Scotland

    Jeeez

    Reply
  248. Robert Peffers says:

    @orri says: 20 August, 2015 at 12:41 pm:

    ” … If the electorate are “stupid” it’s because there’s been so much aimed at the SNP that’s turned out to be crap that we’ve simply come to adopt the attitude that Labour as simply low grade bullshit merchants who might as well be ignored”.

    The salient point, orri, is that Labour have now become as irrelevant to the majority of the Scottish electorate as the long irrelevant Tories.

    You do not need a giant intellect to realise that as the Unionists propaganda has long succeeded in conflating the terms UK, Britain and England as mutually interchangeable terms, and as Scots cannot really identify themselves as English, then the voters in Scotland have become increasingly alienated with all things connected to, “The Establishment”.

    Note how the majority of Scots now identify the Scottish Branch office of the Westminster Labour Party as, “Red Tories”, and regard the LibDems as no better than Tories with their brains removed to prove the point. Note also the many Scottish Labour Unionist pontifications that claimed, “If the Scots vote for independence they will cease to be British”.

    Quite obviously these numpties actually do conflate the United Kingdom and Britain as exactly the same thing. Then, as they also conflate the terms, “England”, and, “Britain”, then it follows they believe that we are all really just a branch of England.

    Don’t just take my word for it. Did not, David Mundell, (“The Hecht Heid Ain”, of the Conservative & Unionist Party in Scotland), quote from a UK Government commissioned paper thus : – “The Treaty of Union extinguished the Kingdom of Scotland and renamed the Kingdom of England as the United Kingdom”.

    That paper was produced during the pre-referendum debate and seems now rather much buried amid official document titles in the Westminster archives. (I do, though, have a copy of it filed away on a computer).

    The document is long and rambling but does indeed express the official views that the three country Kingdom of England of 1706/7 did indeed absorb Scotland and not, as the actual treaty reads, join with an equally sovereign kingdom. Their problem is they have not, after 408 years, managed to persuade the Scottish electorate of its veracity.

    Methinks they never will. The very title, “United Kingdom”, gives the lie to the idea of a legal English takeover. Fact is, though, the reality of Westminster is that it is the de facto Parliament of the Kingdom of England but is masquerading under the title of, “The Parliament of the United Kingdom”, and that’s without the very idea of, “EVEL”.

    Reply
  249. HandandShrimp says:

    I can’t take a word Tomkins says seriously. He is so over the top in his Col Blimp unionist nonsense he reads more like one of the more deranged Telegraph below the line reactionaries.

    That said anyone that calls my country North Britain is hardly going to get much of a hearing.

    With regards 2021 the backdrop will the utter shambles that the Tories have wrought on public services and UK international relations. I think the SNP will look pretty damned good by comparison.

    Reply
  250. No no no...Yes says:

    Prof Tomkins could very well be touting himslef as a potential Tory MSP candidate given the forthcoming retirement of many of the current bunch.

    Reply
  251. Lesley-Anne says:

    john king says: at 6:49 am

    Commander Lesley-Anne says
    “Sorry Tam … I just couldn’t be bothered writing out Combat Battle Group out in full … AGAIN! :D”

    Eh?
    Carrier Strike Group surely commander?
    A bit behind the times aren’t we C.A.G.?

    This aint the gulf of Tonkin, this aint the USS Franklin D Roosevelt and this aint Vietnam 1968 sailor! 🙂

    Well to be fair John I was trying, and obviously failing 😉 , NOT to Americanise too much what might eventually pass as a floating football pitch and a couple of team buses. 😀

    Boy, I love a wee side discussion these days. I get promoted from Village Idiot to Commander to C.A.G. (Commander Air Group) to Rear Admiral all in the space of 24 hours! 😀

    Thanks John and Rob for my multiple promotions I’ll try and keep up my high, or should that be LOW standards, in future. 😛

    Don’t worry though folks I’ve left my books at the back of the class … I won’t be *ahem* front and centre for too much longer. 😀

    Reply
  252. heedtracker says:

    Prof Tomkins could very well be touting himslef as a potential Tory MSP candidate given the forthcoming retirement of many of the current bunch.

    He wants to close down Holyrood and turn it into a Travel Lodge. Anyway his whole Tory thing is scrapping everything Scotland, so MSP Tomkins not likely. Lord Adam Of Kent and Glasgow is the holy North Britain goal and why not, lady Mone’s set the bar very high for that ghastly outfit membership.

    Reply
  253. Tinto Chiel says:

    ArtyHetty, the “incredibly cruel and uncaring bunch” you describe were forensically dissected and analysed by one of our greatest 20th century Scots in his most famous address. I used to have a newspaper facsimile edition of it on my classroom wall, for the edification of the tinies. When I returned after a short period of absence, it had disappeared, which I took to be a compliment.

    Macart’s mention of it on another blog brought it all back. It is as fresh and relevant now as it was forty years ago. Mrs Balls was wrong to talk about the politics of the past when referring to socialism: the notions of fairness, equality and justice are never out of date and indeed drove most of the Yes campaign. In this respect I think we are way ahead of the English people at the moment.

    link to scottishleftreview.org

    Reply
  254. louis.b.argyll says:

    Robert Peffers at 1:51pm

    Spot on as ever.. Thankyou.

    ..quote from a UK Government commissioned paper thus : –

    “The Treaty of Union extinguished the Kingdom of Scotland and renamed the Kingdom of England as the United Kingdom”

    There we have it. I’m getting it on a t-shirt. With an ‘explicit lyrics’ warning tag!

    Reply
  255. Glamaig says:

    1:34pm

    “Mark my words the end is coming for Labour and Corbyn will be the key catalyst in it’s demise.”

    Then sometime before the GM in 2020 hopefully many more Labour-voting Scots will see that the Tories are likely to control the UK for decades, are going to continue in the planned destruction of Scotlands economy and democracy, and the only way out is independence. The longer the Tories are in power the more corrupt and vicious they become. We’ve seen it before.

    Reply
  256. dakk says:

    Labour have been exposed as the fake/champagne socialists they are.

    Fat cat Council cronyism and public sector nouveaux riche was their last hurrah.

    Michael Kelly should take a good look in the mirror and join the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party.

    Either that or just ‘cut his own throat and feed himself’. 🙂

    Reply
  257. heedtracker says:

    On you are all idiots topic, hard core Toryboy Press and Journal give Keiza Dugdale a massive full page boost today. It’s been over 24 hours since the last UKOK blast from those sneaky shits but it’s still a bit of a creepout watching hard core Tories boosting SLabour to victory and beyond.

    Keiza says vote SLabour because she’s a Quine from the North East. As good a reason as any other red and blue Tory freak out. Usual better together stuff after that, local girl for local issues, SNP bad, rule Britannia. UKOK propaganda writes itself really and all of it free gratis from hard right, roylas grovelling, Holyrood hating P&J.

    Also there no oil left now says P&J at front of their organ, slide further in to their crapola of Britishness and all their oil industry stuff is How Norway’s oil and gas construction sector is booming. Funny that.

    Reply
  258. Lesley-Anne says:

    heedtracker says:

    Keiza says vote SLabour because she’s a Quine from the North East. As good a reason as any other red and blue Tory freak out. Usual better together stuff after that, local girl for local issues, SNP bad, rule Britannia. UKOK propaganda writes itself really and all of it free gratis from hard right, roylas grovelling, Holyrood hating P&J

    I have one, or is it two, question(s) here HT. 😉

    If she is a *ahem* local girl for local issues etc why then did she stand, as a list candidate I believe, in GLASGOW in 2011 and why is she now standing in EDINBURGH in 2016? 😀

    Surely as a local girl for local issues she should be standing where she is *ahem* local … in the NORTH EAST!

    Reply
  259. Iain More says:

    @Glamaig

    Now that the Tories have a majority there is nothing to stop them driving through the Electoral reforms they wanted to enact the last time, the ones that the Fib Dooms blocked when they realised they would lose a pile a seats on the reduction of MP numbers and the subsequent boundary changes.

    The Tories will be locking everybody out of Govt not just for decades to come but probably the rest of the century.

    Labour will never win another election in my lifetime though I live by some miracle to be a 140 which would just about take me to the end of this century. The Brit Nat Press and Media will try to create the impression that Labour can though to keep the grasping Brit Nat mitts round our Scottish throats.

    Reply
  260. Macart says:

    @Tinto Chiel

    Its the only politics I have Tinto and its all in that speech. The values and aspirations expressed in that address will never grow old, no matter how hard others try to convince you of their impracticality in todays politics.

    Reply
  261. Anne Bruce says:

    Tinto Chiel @ 2.36pm.

    Re: Jimmy Reid’s Rectorial Address. It’s worth reading over and over again.

    Thanks for reminding me of it. So true.

    Reply
  262. Chic McGregor says:

    @Tinto Chiel

    Jimmy was also the first person I heard say “I did not leave the Labour party, they left me.”

    At Stuart McMillan’s adoption night some years ago.

    Think I still have it on VT somewhere.

    Reply
  263. Robert Peffers says:

    @louis.b.argyll says:

    20 August, 2015 at 2:38 pm

    Robert Peffers at 1:51pm

    Spot on as ever.. Thankyou.

    ..quote from a UK Government commissioned paper thus : –

    “The Treaty of Union extinguished the Kingdom of Scotland and renamed the Kingdom of England as the United Kingdom”

    There we have it. I’m getting it on a t-shirt. With an ‘explicit lyrics’ warning tag!

    Thanks for the complement, louis.b, but the paper in question is very long and couched in legal terms by a couple of the U.K’s tame Professors. These two claim to be experts in International Law. However, it is so clearly not as they depict it, as to make their learned paper very clearly a work of pure fiction.

    The actual Treaty of Union could not be clearer. The wording is unambiguous and a fairly bright primary one pupil could not fail to understand it. Here are articles I & III, (Article II only concerns the monarchy’s succession and accession).

    I. THAT the two Kingdoms of Scotland and England shall upon the first day of May next ensuing the date hereof, and for ever after, be united into One Kingdom by the Name of GREAT BRITAIN; And that the Ensigns Armorial of the said United Kingdom be such as Her Majesty shall appoint,, and the Crosses of St Andrew and St George be conjoined, in such manner as Her Majesty shall think fit, and used in all Flags, Banners, Standards and Ensigns, both at Sea and Land.

    III. THAT the United Kingdom of Great Britain be Represented by one and the same Parliament to be stiled The Parliament of Great Britain.

    It could not be any clearer when the reader knows the Kingdom of England of 1706/7 was composed of an England that had already annexed the former sovereign states of Wales and all Ireland.

    However, in 1688, the legal system of the Kingdom of England had changed from, “Divine Right of Kings”, into that of, “A Constitutional Monarchy”, after the English Parliament deposed King James II and imported King Billy & Queen Mary but removed from them the royal veto over the English Parliament.

    The above quote clearly unites two equally sovereign kingdoms and there isn’t a single mention of countries in the entire document. Which is the very easy to understand reason that the resultant union is entitled, “The United Kingdom”, and not either, “The Kingdom of England”, nor referred to as a single country of any kind.

    Reply
  264. call me dave says:

    Scotland’s population reaches a new high. 🙂

    link to nationalrecordsofscotland.gov.uk

    PS:
    Good for a laugh on a quiet day.

    One of James Kelly’s finest moments.
    He’s on Kezia’s team you know.

    “That’s not the point” he says. We say “James it is the point”!

    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  265. heedtracker says:

    Surely as a local girl for local issues she should be standing where she is *ahem* local … in the NORTH EAST!

    Well its a full vote Keiza blast from P&J with lovely photo of Keiza, next to lovely ladies, lovely but endless loveliness of lovely Keiza, who’s lovely say Press and Journal, who’s also lovely, really really lovely.

    Actually for fairness, Kaiza says headline is “I’m a north-east quine who will speak up for Scotland” which is lovely. This lovely loveliness is actually an interview with lovely Keiza in the Punjabi cafe Leith, Embro.

    More of all new and lovelier than ever lovely Keiza in TOMORROW’s lovely Press and Journal, when lovely Keiza “talks of her passion for education.”

    Its just me but has Bliar McBloater and his idiot side kick Macternan moved to Aberdeen Journals lately.

    Five more years of this red and blue tory fraud Scotland, five more yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaars:D

    Press and Journal also farted likes of toryboys Michael Gove and Jim(The Madness of July)Naughty into the universe, so that’s all you probably need to know about these toryboys.

    Reply
  266. Tinto Chiel says:

    To Macart, Anne Bruce and Chic McGregor: amen to all that. I go back to this speech when I am fed up and things seem pretty dark and it restores my hope for the future. There is a better way of living and we can do it here in Scotland, if we can drain the swamp of the Union and break free. I think we all feel that on here.

    @call me dave

    Dearie, dearie me, cmd! Has he been taking lessons from from Kooky Kelly? As Bugs Bunny used to say, “What a maroon!”

    Reply
  267. Robert Peffers says:

    Glamaig says: 20 August, 2015 at 2:41 pm:

    “Then sometime before the GM in 2020 hopefully many more Labour-voting Scots will see that the Tories are likely to control the UK for decades, are going to continue in the planned destruction of Scotland’s economy and democracy, and the only way out is independence.”

    Personally I concluded, after the GE vote, that the Labour Party were already finished – wi the mauks a’ready crawling aa ower the mankit bouk o the aince great pairty.

    The residue of those, elected to office members at Holyrood and local council level, were already dead men, (and women), walking. They just have not realised they are dead yet.

    Reply
  268. call me dave says:

    Kezia probes the SG about new powers says Hootsman.

    ‘There are more questions than answers’ from Kezia which is strange as the SNP are always stealing their clothes, allegedly.

    Hey Kezia! What are the labour party plans for using the new powers and all the rest…Answers on a post card.

    link to archive.is
    ————————————————————-

    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  269. Lesley-Anne says:

    So she plans to *ahem* “Shake up the establishment” then does she CMD? 😉

    I wonder, would that be:

    1) Labour HQ, London
    2) Labour HQ (Branch Office), Glasgow
    3) Labour party in Holyrood
    4)The Orange Order

    😀

    Reply
  270. Richardinho says:

    The wheel WILL turn, but whilst it is true that the only sure thing is that things change, what they never do is change back to the way they were. Just as it’s hard to imagine the SNP being in power at Holyrood indefinitely, it’s equally hard to imagine going back to state where Labour have a monopoly of power in Scotland.

    Quite simply, the Nationalist party has became the national party of Scotland.
    Ironically that’s in the wake of a vote of the Scottish people to stay part of Britain, and it’s interesting to speculate as to whether the SNP’s success is due to an out and out desire for independence or because even unionists see that Scotland needs a powerful voice within the union and Labour was not providing this.

    Maybe Scotland will settle down within the United Kingdom but this will only be because Scotland’s concerns are answered, not dismissed as ‘grievances’ by those down south. Quite simply the likes of Michael Kelly need to acknowledge this.

    Of course Michael Kelly will no doubt simply die rather than ever do this and it will be left for the next generation of Labourites to deal with the issue.

    Reply
  271. wee jamie says:

    Although I am not a celtic fan,Many years ago a mate of mine had a spare ticket for a mid week European game at parkhead, and asked me to attend.During the half time interval, a bemused and terrified urban fox ran onto the pitch, and the home support immediately started to sing “There’s only one Michael Kelly”. Even back then they had him pegged for what he is !

    Reply
  272. Tinto Chiel says:

    A previous post went missing, apologies.

    @Macart, Anne Bruce, Chic McGregor: amen to all that. I go back to this speech whenever I get a bit fed up with our situation and it gives me hope for the future. We can have a better way of living in Scotland, everyone on here feels that. However, we need to drain the swamp of this Union and break free from its malign influence.

    @call me dave. 3.33

    Dearie, dearie, me, he’s not very good is he? He must have been taking lessons from Kooky Kelly. As Bugs Bunny would say, “What a maroon!”

    Reply
  273. heedtracker says:

    Richardinho, the referendum changed Scotland permanently and the really great teams prepare the next winning generation. Its a universal thing in a lot of things. Just look at how New Labour collapsed and before that the empty Major years that dribbled down the drain.

    Sturgeon hit the UKOK ground running, so hopefully Swinney’s another Salmond.

    Reply
  274. Grouse Beater says:

    O/T The Lottery ticket, the tax by another method, the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, the sop for the poor to give us false hope, the one that was to be a £1 a ticket and no more is not £2. Can anybody tell me which political party had that increase in their manifesto?

    Reply
  275. Fiona says:

    Lottery is not a tax: you do not have to pay it. It is a for profit business some of whose profits are diverted for public purposes, because it is run as a franchise

    I think it is important to keep a clear distinction between tax and these other arrangements. The mantra that tax is a bad thing is all pervasive, by design, and so govts do go to great lengths to raise money by other means. Another example is PFI. But that is not a tax either, nor is govt dependent on raising money in order to finance spending: all of that narrative is wrong and needs to be challenged at its root

    If we accept that such things are tax we collude with the underlying fiction, and that leads to the austerity agenda. It is regressive in its effect and so as a metaphor it is legitimate to describe it as a “tax on desperation” but it is not a true tax, and the price of a ticket is not under direct govt control. You have not seat on the lottery board, and there is no representation accompanying payment, so it is fundamentally at odds with democratic conceptions of the legitimacy of tax

    Reply
  276. michael diamond says:

    Just another example of the utter contempt liebor hold for the electorate in scotland. Jeez i hate these b******s even more than i hate the tories, and thats saying something.

    Reply
  277. Bryan Mitchell says:

    So many country’s fighting and dieing for independence as Scotland did in its past and 55% of its people voted it down. 55%!!! Pox on ’em! Ya feckin turds! Unfortunately most people are reactionary and thoughtless. The SNP is at the top now but as soon as something goes awry it will be the red headed stepchild and people will turn against them rather than trying to fix it. Thinking people question, nonthinking people just knee jerk react. It is the same old psychological ploy, ‘truthiness’, if not downright lies to mislead those who don’t question. But then that’s politics, pray on the ignorant.

    Reply
  278. Nathaniel Hamilton says:

    HAA!! I’m only a wee Half wit. Who’s the Moron now? Every politician should line up so I can kick them in the teeth. Warning from America, the parties are Garbage. The democratic system is a complete failure. Government will only work if the people can call to vote any time on any member or law. As far as British should be concerned, their business is whether or not Scottish residents agree to secede. Its not their place to be involved in any other aspect of an election.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,726 Posts, 1,215,008 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “41% Tariffs on Falkland Islands. What did they do to piss off Fuhrer Trump? I had no idea that the…Apr 3, 08:15
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “Another cunning plan based on a whole heap of made up legal arguments which no court, anywhere, is going to…Apr 3, 06:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Sacrifice: “@Zimba Regarding moral inconsistencies. I believe a meaningful debate between fair-minded individuals acting in good faith first needs some kind…Apr 2, 21:17
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “IMPORTANT: Leah Gunn Barrett attended the Public Petitions Committee at Holyrood today in order to see what would happen to…Apr 2, 19:40
    • agent x on The Gender Of Mountains: “Caroline Lucas says: “He helped transform the fortunes of the Scottish Green party – taking the party into government for…Apr 2, 18:13
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Have a wee look at her post and highlights of committee meeting today at Holyrood today, she’s a fighter, well…Apr 2, 18:08
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:04
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:00
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Soz, double post…Apr 2, 17:41
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – to understand why the geographic separation requirement is so important you have to look back at the context…Apr 2, 17:31
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Was & still am a follower of the Rev, but starting to question myself why, isn’t it about time he…Apr 2, 17:27
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Was & still am a follower of the Rev, but starting to question myself why, isn’t it about time he…Apr 2, 17:27
    • twathater on The Gender Of Mountains: “Another piece of evidence to EXPOSE the continued ongoing lunacy that we must find some way to address https://open.substack.com/pub/iainmacwhirter/p/trans-cat-msp-cleared-of-non-crime?r=5catlo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=emailApr 2, 16:38
    • Zimba on The Sacrifice: “First off, apologies for essentially posting the same (or similar) comment twice. I’m not a frequent poster here (or anywhere…Apr 2, 15:59
    • Zimba on The Long Future: “This is not a portrait of what Scotland’s politicians alone have become. The malaise is sadly European generally and is…Apr 2, 15:21
    • Mark Beggan on The Gender Of Mountains: “Is Greer related to Chapman. Strange shaped head sneering mouth with studs for teeth and eyes that sit suspiciously in…Apr 2, 14:35
    • Mark Beggan on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Teletubbies have to say bye bye Dipsy. Dipsy likes bouncing on his bottom. But now Dipsy has a sore…Apr 2, 13:45
    • Hatey McHateface on The Sacrifice: “Ah, Zimba, always good to hear from the kind of poster who believes that any number of dead men, women,…Apr 2, 13:17
    • Zimba on The Sacrifice: “Good job, Hatey, our kindly bombs and bullets can help them learn to see their own moral failings before it’s…Apr 2, 12:14
    • Zimba on The Sacrifice: “Good thing, Hatey, our bombs and bullets are there to help them see their moral failings while being clinically slaughtered.Apr 2, 11:57
    • Andrew scott on The Gender Of Mountains: “Good news the green gnome is standing down as co co chair scot greens BAD NEWS NOT STANDING DOWN FROM…Apr 2, 11:40
    • Louise Hogg on The Long Future: “ALBA Party exists: 1. So voters HAVE a genuinely pro-Independence option to vote for on the ballot paper. As Young…Apr 2, 11:15
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Hear, hear. The Rev is doing a great job in not letting this all go unreported.Apr 2, 11:04
    • Louise Hogg on The Gender Of Mountains: “Absolutely agree, Lorn. This utter infestation of porn-addict driven filth needs cleared out of any organisation directly or indirectly receiving…Apr 2, 10:40
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “@Aidan; No, Aidan, I’m not trying to argue that a ChatGPT summary overrides the explicit language of a UN declaration.…Apr 2, 08:49
    • Alf Baird on The Gender Of Mountains: ““‘jellyfish legislation’” The Welsh term for jellyfish is ‘wibli wobli’, which seems to well describe this type of legislation.Apr 2, 08:49
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Just two? You’re not paying enough attention 🙂Apr 2, 08:37
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “While many in the world are celebrating the “end of woke”, the legions of woke, fully insinuated into positions of…Apr 2, 08:33
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““Colonialism is over” But wait, Geri. Haven’t you to duly punish them at the ballot box first? You’re trying to…Apr 2, 08:21
    • Chas on The Gender Of Mountains: “I suspect that Geri and Billy Carlin are the same person, with two user names?Apr 2, 08:19
  • A tall tale



↑ Top