I was surprised & happy James Cook put the positive case in his tweet, instead of the ‘warning’ & dooms laden headlines we’ve been used to lately. First time I’ve seen that way round.
And nothing will change all the way till Sept 18. It will be so important that people will be able to access online research with links to independent facts and figures, which we know are out there, that proves to NO’s and undecided’s that we can indeed be independent.
I saw a site simplify2014.com a few months ago which would do just that, and of course Wings is evidence based.
It will be more difficult to get to those who don’t do internet, but I guess that’s where the YES ground campaign comes in.
James Cook’s an alright guy. I quite like the way he sticks up for himself on Twitter as well. I certainly wouldn’t have him on the “List of BBC folk who should be sacked on the spot”.
Even ignoring the source, that pretty much is the entire debate.
Westminster says we can’t, Holyrood says we can.
Add in a wee bit of pepper (pensions, currency, EU etc) and you have yourself what David Cameron probably thinks is a debate. Having watched PMQ’s a couple of times, I can imagine how he believes debate is run. Say something stupid, then shout down anyone else saying you’ve said something stupid.
Finding a penny of a footpath can be categorised as a “recovery” when the entire western world is almost bankrupt from a self-induced collapse in its economic system.
Bunter, simplify2014 has as good as nothing on it at the moment and if they are just starting to put it together now it wont be complete before the referendum.
Would it not be interesting if AFTER a YES vote, and negotiations are complete and Independence day has passed.
That the Scottish Government of the day sue the BBC for going against their own charter in an International Court?
While trying to prevent Scottish democracy.
Just a thought!
The Bannockburn commemorations being held at Bannockburn Battlefield, Stirling, on Saturday 28 and Sunday 29 June are in danger of being diminished due to the MoD insisting on holding Armed Forces Day at the same time in the same City.
Appearing in front of the same committee, an official from the council revealed that the MoD named Stirling as the venue for armed forces day and insisted it be held on the same weekend as Bannockburn.
In view of the success of the 2013 March and Rally for Scottish Independence (circa 30,000 of us turned up – link to wingsoverscotland.com), and seeing as the 2014 March and Rally for Scottish Independence has been cancelled, hows about we use the Bannockburn venue as an unofficial independence rally?
Get your Saltires back out of storage and turn up at Bannockburn – Then, when the MOD do their fly-over of Bannockburn Battlefield they’ll see that London’s attempt to thwart the Bannockburn event has failed completely.
So, will the blatantly biased BBC now leave the CBI? Or will they just come clean, and formally join with the CBI in campaigning for a vote against the restoration of democracy and Scottish independence?
As for Robert Gordon’s University, what does ‘suspending membership’ of the CBI ACTUALLY mean??? Or is it just spin? Devil is in the detail.
@Jimbo
If you look at the registration and payment page for Bannockburn they expressly state that campaign badges, posters, flags etc and campaigning for either side in the referendum will not be allowed in.
Jimbo, totally agree with your comments, a bad state of affairs. Ref the MOD, this, for sure, would have been a Westminster instruction. It is purely to try and belittle an important part of our history.( they do not want us to have any pre union history!) Whoever is really responsible should be put in stocks at Bannockburn and had rotten eggs thrown at them.
Barney Thomson – saw that. Sally Magnusson having to announce BBC/CBI membership position still to be responded to by BBC, really did stick in her craw – coughing through gritted teeth.
If BBC don’t resign or, as RGU have done, suspend their membership of CBI until after the ref.,then shurely they can no longer be allowed to cover indy.
No way we could afford tickets to Bannockburn, but could prob be in Stirling on the day…is there a law saying we can’t wear our YES badges then? I might print a couple of saltires onto my white troosers as well…
Just to check I am not going mad, you can not take a saltire to Bannockburn celebration day ?
But you can take a union flag to armed forces day, on the same day, during a referendum build up because one flag is showing political bias and the other somehow does not ?
Imagine if Robert the bruce was told if he turned up to face the English at Bannockburn and was told, “sorry mate, you cannot come here dressed like that…..move on nothing to see here”
The flag of our nation banned from a historical event in our nation’s history.
Those union flags on armed forces day will presumably be banned if the Scottish part of the design is not removed then ?
I know their is a fundraiser for 10,000 Saltires, on the go, but can’t remember where. Perhaps the idea behind that is to flood Bannockburn with Scottish flags. And why not? If they tried to arrest all of us for waving OUR flag at Bannockburn celebrations – very, very, very bad BT publicity for their WW1 celebrations. After all, was WW1 not supposed to be a fight for our freedom?
Just looked up the Bannockburn site and read that the Bannockburn celebration can’t be held on the actual date (24th June) because the National Trust are having the new Centre opening event on that day. Naturally that is a more important event than the 700th Anniversary of the battle. The date of the opening obviously can’t be moved but the date of the battle can. By an amazing coincidence, Armed Forces Day (wasn’t that Gordon Brown’s invention) is to be held in Stirling on exactly the same wrong date as the Bannockburn celebration. Armed Forces day marks the 70th anniversary of D Day and 2014 marks the outbreak of WW1 so many flags will be in evidence. I look forward to seeing the pics!
STV quit the CBI 4 days ago. The BBC are still thinking about it. Why didn’t they resign from it immediately? Rhetorical question – we all know the answer.
“If BBC don’t resign or, as RGU have done, suspend their membership of CBI until after the ref.,then shurely they can no longer be allowed to cover indy.”
Logically this is absolutely correct, and the Electoral Commission should be alerted to this if BBC still have not resigned after the official campaign starts. However I can’t find any reference to broadcasters in the EC website, so yet again it looks like the state has it all sewn up.
I smell something rotten in the National Trust, pressure put on them to alter dates and I would not go to the Armed Forces Day for that very reason. This is terrible that no Saltires are allowed, allowed for god’s sake at the site of the most important battle in our history. Robert Bruce will be turning in his grave, there will be an earthquake at the Abbey in Dunfermline.
@ Helena Brown
The National Trust is chaired by Sir Kenneth Calman, dad of Susan Calman, and formerly chief Medical Officer of Scotland and England. So perhaps there was no need to apply very much pressure? I would expect Stirling council is also very happy to combine these two prestigious events into one weekend – the wrong one.
“If you look at the registration and payment page for Bannockburn they expressly state that campaign badges, posters, flags etc and campaigning for either side in the referendum will not be allowed in.
So your suggestion is a non-starter.”
I have been all over the Bannockburn site and the ticket soup terms & conds . I can not find the info that you have posted above. Would you mind posting a link as I would like to take a flag (just a plain saltire) .
It’s probably the case that there’s no Yes Campaign (or Better Together) stalls at the event – knowing Stirling Council, it was probably a condition of the licence – but there’s nothing stopping paying customers turning up with whatever they want (except weapons, dogs, barbecues, professional video equipment etc as stated in the conditions)
You people are obsessed with claiming the BBC (and everyone who isn’t biased towards your opinions) is biased.
They aren’t, they are probably one the least biased news sources (cue snorts of indignation).
The guy tweeted two separate Yes and No arguments, how on earth can he be more unbiased?
The BBC is obsessed with avoiding criticism and treading lightly, seems like Scottish nationalists manage to be so sensitive – or maybe disingenuous – that they can never be “balanced” enough, unless they are “balanced” in favour of the Yes argument and against anything that seems a bit Londonish.
Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.
Willie on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Excellent article Mr Campbell. Summarises very well how the wheels have now been taken off the insanity bandwagon. The transcripts…” Jul 20, 08:50
stuckdoonhame on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Massive kudos to you, Lorn, not only for your ever sensible analysis of this nonsense but for your correct use…” Jul 20, 02:20
stuckdoonhame on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Massive kudos to you, Lorn, not only for your ever sensible analysis of this nonsense but for your correct use…” Jul 20, 02:13
Rob on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Its perfectly obvious that NHS Fife are trying to find something, anything, to blacken Peggies character t try and salvage…” Jul 20, 00:26
Lorn on The Pillars Of Sanity: “The National is a disgrace as a national newspaper. Its pages are in vested with ‘trans’ dogma and its support…” Jul 19, 23:23
dearieme on The Pillars Of Sanity: “James VI decided, later in life, that he’d been wrong about witches. They weren’t bad, they were mad. He supported…” Jul 19, 22:43
Alf Baird on The Pillars Of Sanity: “UKSC, Court of Session and ScotGov and other state institutions all serve the English (as British) Crown, i.e. they do…” Jul 19, 20:25
agent x on The Pillars Of Sanity: “@ Kelpie If they withdraw their defence then it becomes a default judgment and every point raised by the clamant…” Jul 19, 20:03
agent x on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Notice also that Upton is described as “she” despite having a cock and bollocks.” Jul 19, 19:34
Aidan on The Pillars Of Sanity: “@Kelpie – you are exactly right, that is definitely what they are planning to do” Jul 19, 19:22
Aidan on The Pillars Of Sanity: “@Alf – how does that relate specifically to the comments raised?” Jul 19, 19:20
Kelpie on The Pillars Of Sanity: “There are plenty of legal types on X saying that NHS Fife can totally end this right now by basically…” Jul 19, 19:15
agent x on The Pillars Of Sanity: “The National barely mentions the Sandie Peggie case but yesterday published: “Sandie Peggie denies making racist comment as new allegation…” Jul 19, 19:09
Alf Baird on The Pillars Of Sanity: “In the colonial situation there is only colonial governance: which implies “a government and a judicial system fed and renewed…” Jul 19, 19:04
Dave Hansell on The Pillars Of Sanity: ““The days when police forces across the UK acted as pet goon squads for every misogynist incel with a grudge,…” Jul 19, 18:39
Dave G on The Pillars Of Sanity: “As a matter of strict law the Northumbria Police judgement does not apply in Scotland since the jurisdiction of the…” Jul 19, 18:30
James on Points Into Prongs: “Dave L; yep, they don’t call he/she/it the Site Prick for nothing….” Jul 19, 18:19
agent x on The Pillars Of Sanity: “@ Alf “On 8 December 2023, the Outer House of the Court of Session, part of Scotland’s highest civil court,…” Jul 19, 18:15
Confused on The Pillars Of Sanity: “balance is restored to the force www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAbIL8C2JJ0” Jul 19, 18:12
agent x on The Pillars Of Sanity: “16 APRIL 2025 – VICTORY #1 Arguably (we’ll come to that later) the most crucial victory of them all was…” Jul 19, 18:11
Andy Storrie on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Come on, Campbell. You just canny help yourself, son. Let it go. This bullshit is yesterdays propaganda, lad!” Jul 19, 17:33
Aidan on The Pillars Of Sanity: “@Alf – but isn’t that exactly what has happened, look at who are the hero’s in this story. The U.K.…” Jul 19, 17:27
William G Walker on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Dear Rev, I’m pleased that your “report of victories” got a first-class response from all your fans! It must take…” Jul 19, 17:21
Lorn on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Great piece, Rev. I do hope that you, with all the other people who placed their heads above the parapet…” Jul 19, 17:13
Alf Baird on The Pillars Of Sanity: “A widna haud ma breith on any UK state quango protecting the rights of Scots, though she may learn something…” Jul 19, 17:06
Peter McAvoy on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Well done to everybody who refused to accept and challenged this woke fascism and to the deserved victories you have…” Jul 19, 16:22
Ian le coup on The Pillars Of Sanity: “DEI Diversity Equality Inclusivity is an absolute and utter con, created by the woke by the woke. DEI must DIE!!!” Jul 19, 15:57
sarah on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Somewhere, over the rainbow… there is a happy land of sanity where children and women, and their supporters, can live…” Jul 19, 15:53
Marie Clark on The Pillars Of Sanity: “Well done Stuart, you’ve been in this fight for a long time and it’s nice to see the outcome now.…” Jul 19, 15:49
panda paws on The Pillars Of Sanity: “However deranged this week has been, I have every faith that next week will be the gift that keeps on…” Jul 19, 15:47
I was surprised & happy James Cook put the positive case in his tweet, instead of the ‘warning’ & dooms laden headlines we’ve been used to lately. First time I’ve seen that way round.
Haha, I thought this was going to be the post with the collection of all the best bits from the last 2 years…
James Cook is worth following on twitter, he probably is the most balanced voice that the BBC has in the debate.
Parallel universe theory in action ?
And nothing will change all the way till Sept 18. It will be so important that people will be able to access online research with links to independent facts and figures, which we know are out there, that proves to NO’s and undecided’s that we can indeed be independent.
I saw a site simplify2014.com a few months ago which would do just that, and of course Wings is evidence based.
It will be more difficult to get to those who don’t do internet, but I guess that’s where the YES ground campaign comes in.
If anyone thinks James Cook is the most balanced then it just highlights how bad the rest are if it makes him look “balanced”.
Scottish nation statehood will not happen, end of.
Yours honestly, the BBC.
I’ve always found Alan Little to be well balanced and perhaps leaning towards YES. He gave Flipper a roasting on Hardtalk at link to bbc.co.uk
OT: It looks like RGU is now out of the CBI: principal’s blog (last paragraph)
James Cook’s an alright guy. I quite like the way he sticks up for himself on Twitter as well. I certainly wouldn’t have him on the “List of BBC folk who should be sacked on the spot”.
Meanwhile the wee bauchle’s oot her bunker again…
I thought the Sun’s chief political correspondent made some interesting remarks on the debate earlier too:
link to twitter.com
Even ignoring the source, that pretty much is the entire debate.
Westminster says we can’t, Holyrood says we can.
Add in a wee bit of pepper (pensions, currency, EU etc) and you have yourself what David Cameron probably thinks is a debate. Having watched PMQ’s a couple of times, I can imagine how he believes debate is run. Say something stupid, then shout down anyone else saying you’ve said something stupid.
Normally the media isn’t nearly that balanced
I thought recent Daily Express (pensions) headlines were perfectly balanced.
O/T
link to bbc.co.uk
Don’t they want to be Better Together?
@Sandy Brownlee
Nice one. As I’ve said before, the CBI – the gift that keeps on giving.
James Cook tweeted the excellent National Collective Daily Express pensions photo-montage the other day. Just sayin’.
“Economic recovery?”
Finding a penny of a footpath can be categorised as a “recovery” when the entire western world is almost bankrupt from a self-induced collapse in its economic system.
Bunter, simplify2014 has as good as nothing on it at the moment and if they are just starting to put it together now it wont be complete before the referendum.
James Cook has a piece on line just now, regarding the BBC and the CBI
Hey, this laddie Cook…going up in my estimation
link to bbc.co.uk
Brave!
My post disappeared but James Cook has a piece on BBC online raising the issue of the BBC and CBI – hats off to you!
Sorry if this is a duplicate
My post disappeared too.
This dude’s as balanced as all BBC in Scotland “broadcasters” are eg. link to bbc.co.uk
So here we go and straight from BBC college of journalism/propaganda honours graduate we have “insisted, denied” as much as BBC online space allows-
“Alex Salmond has insisted, He insisted a “yes” vote would be, Mr Salmond denied that his plans, He insisted that the real, danger” and so on.
And then from same BBC ligger for Con/Dem/UKOK Carmicheal, or just one more pledgesigner on NO student fees etc Cooke writes,
“Responding to Mr Salmond’s speech, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said HS2 was an argument for remaining in the UK.”
Bish bosh vote no.
Aha, James Cook lifts the lid on the BBC and the CBI. Even better.
Would it not be interesting if AFTER a YES vote, and negotiations are complete and Independence day has passed.
That the Scottish Government of the day sue the BBC for going against their own charter in an International Court?
While trying to prevent Scottish democracy.
Just a thought!
Sincere apologies for going OT here:
The Bannockburn commemorations being held at Bannockburn Battlefield, Stirling, on Saturday 28 and Sunday 29 June are in danger of being diminished due to the MoD insisting on holding Armed Forces Day at the same time in the same City.
Appearing in front of the same committee, an official from the council revealed that the MoD named Stirling as the venue for armed forces day and insisted it be held on the same weekend as Bannockburn.
link to tinyurl.com
In view of the success of the 2013 March and Rally for Scottish Independence (circa 30,000 of us turned up – link to wingsoverscotland.com), and seeing as the 2014 March and Rally for Scottish Independence has been cancelled, hows about we use the Bannockburn venue as an unofficial independence rally?
Get your Saltires back out of storage and turn up at Bannockburn – Then, when the MOD do their fly-over of Bannockburn Battlefield they’ll see that London’s attempt to thwart the Bannockburn event has failed completely.
Further info here: link to bannockburnlive.com
Too many comments…can’t keep up…RGU has finally left CBI?
The BBC next up for shaving?
Is James Cook’s apparent neutrality his own doing, or has the BBC put him up to it, to try and give the impression of some balance.
RGU have ‘suspended’ their membership until the referendum. Didn’t one of their high heidyins have some links with the CBI?
Hoi Rev, pay your bills!
link to bbc.co.uk
Why have The Royal Bank of Scotland and Clydesdale Bank not resigned from the CBI?
Is this the official position of the banks – they support the NO campaign?
So, will the blatantly biased BBC now leave the CBI? Or will they just come clean, and formally join with the CBI in campaigning for a vote against the restoration of democracy and Scottish independence?
As for Robert Gordon’s University, what does ‘suspending membership’ of the CBI ACTUALLY mean??? Or is it just spin? Devil is in the detail.
@Jimbo
If you look at the registration and payment page for Bannockburn they expressly state that campaign badges, posters, flags etc and campaigning for either side in the referendum will not be allowed in.
So your suggestion is a non-starter.
Jimbo says:
Jimbo, totally agree with your comments, a bad state of affairs. Ref the MOD, this, for sure, would have been a Westminster instruction. It is purely to try and belittle an important part of our history.( they do not want us to have any pre union history!) Whoever is really responsible should be put in stocks at Bannockburn and had rotten eggs thrown at them.
Business for Scotland’s pressure on the BBC over the CBI has just been on Reporting Scotland!
Sally nearly coughed up her capuchino.
@ Muscleguy:
Thanks for the info.
OK, forget the Saltires – we could still turn out en masse to make this event the success that London’s puppet masters hope it won’t be.
Barney Thomson – saw that. Sally Magnusson having to announce BBC/CBI membership position still to be responded to by BBC, really did stick in her craw – coughing through gritted teeth.
Jimbo is a WOS / national collective t shirt ok?
Jimbo is a WOS/ national collective t shirt ok?
If BBC don’t resign or, as RGU have done, suspend their membership of CBI until after the ref.,then shurely they can no longer be allowed to cover indy.
Has a petition been started yet? No sense having more than one on the go – will the guy who did the RGU one get it on the go?
RS/James Cook running it now on the news…here we go.
‘The BBC has yet to comment.’
Re Stirling
Go with Saltires and support our armed forces day. Might counter all the union flags if enough turned up?
@ Molly
I don’t see why not, Molly. Ill be wearing my WOS T shirt.
You can buy them here: link to cafepress.com
@Macandroid , quite aggree there, & make sure you’s are
in numbers around the Camera’s positions.
No way we could afford tickets to Bannockburn, but could prob be in Stirling on the day…is there a law saying we can’t wear our YES badges then? I might print a couple of saltires onto my white troosers as well…
The Westminster Gov will always pay pensioners their pension what that monies will be worth is a diffrent matter.
Actually, I think I prefer Macandroid’s suggestion – and have Saltires outnumbering all the others.
Just to check I am not going mad, you can not take a saltire to Bannockburn celebration day ?
But you can take a union flag to armed forces day, on the same day, during a referendum build up because one flag is showing political bias and the other somehow does not ?
Imagine if Robert the bruce was told if he turned up to face the English at Bannockburn and was told, “sorry mate, you cannot come here dressed like that…..move on nothing to see here”
The flag of our nation banned from a historical event in our nation’s history.
Those union flags on armed forces day will presumably be banned if the Scottish part of the design is not removed then ?
I know their is a fundraiser for 10,000 Saltires, on the go, but can’t remember where. Perhaps the idea behind that is to flood Bannockburn with Scottish flags. And why not? If they tried to arrest all of us for waving OUR flag at Bannockburn celebrations – very, very, very bad BT publicity for their WW1 celebrations. After all, was WW1 not supposed to be a fight for our freedom?
Just looked up the Bannockburn site and read that the Bannockburn celebration can’t be held on the actual date (24th June) because the National Trust are having the new Centre opening event on that day. Naturally that is a more important event than the 700th Anniversary of the battle. The date of the opening obviously can’t be moved but the date of the battle can. By an amazing coincidence, Armed Forces Day (wasn’t that Gordon Brown’s invention) is to be held in Stirling on exactly the same wrong date as the Bannockburn celebration. Armed Forces day marks the 70th anniversary of D Day and 2014 marks the outbreak of WW1 so many flags will be in evidence. I look forward to seeing the pics!
STV quit the CBI 4 days ago. The BBC are still thinking about it. Why didn’t they resign from it immediately? Rhetorical question – we all know the answer.
“If BBC don’t resign or, as RGU have done, suspend their membership of CBI until after the ref.,then shurely they can no longer be allowed to cover indy.”
Logically this is absolutely correct, and the Electoral Commission should be alerted to this if BBC still have not resigned after the official campaign starts. However I can’t find any reference to broadcasters in the EC website, so yet again it looks like the state has it all sewn up.
Deliberate, or what?
I smell something rotten in the National Trust, pressure put on them to alter dates and I would not go to the Armed Forces Day for that very reason. This is terrible that no Saltires are allowed, allowed for god’s sake at the site of the most important battle in our history. Robert Bruce will be turning in his grave, there will be an earthquake at the Abbey in Dunfermline.
They cannot stop people with Saltires. No chance.
@ Helena Brown
The National Trust is chaired by Sir Kenneth Calman, dad of Susan Calman, and formerly chief Medical Officer of Scotland and England. So perhaps there was no need to apply very much pressure? I would expect Stirling council is also very happy to combine these two prestigious events into one weekend – the wrong one.
@ Muscleguy
“If you look at the registration and payment page for Bannockburn they expressly state that campaign badges, posters, flags etc and campaigning for either side in the referendum will not be allowed in.
So your suggestion is a non-starter.”
I have been all over the Bannockburn site and the ticket soup terms & conds . I can not find the info that you have posted above. Would you mind posting a link as I would like to take a flag (just a plain saltire) .
Cheers C
Full terms & conditions of Bannockburn Live
link to ticketsoup.com
Nothing there about banning saltires, political banners etc
@Jamie Arriere
Having a huge YES banner I could see causing some issues , but a plain saltire ! It is still the flag of Scotland after all .
If Muscleguy could enlighten me with a link, I would appreciate it .
It’s probably the case that there’s no Yes Campaign (or Better Together) stalls at the event – knowing Stirling Council, it was probably a condition of the licence – but there’s nothing stopping paying customers turning up with whatever they want (except weapons, dogs, barbecues, professional video equipment etc as stated in the conditions)
WTF? GET ME OUT OF HERE (UK)
Barclays approved higher bonuses despite a 30% fall in profits. link to bbc.in
You people are obsessed with claiming the BBC (and everyone who isn’t biased towards your opinions) is biased.
They aren’t, they are probably one the least biased news sources (cue snorts of indignation).
The guy tweeted two separate Yes and No arguments, how on earth can he be more unbiased?
The BBC is obsessed with avoiding criticism and treading lightly, seems like Scottish nationalists manage to be so sensitive – or maybe disingenuous – that they can never be “balanced” enough, unless they are “balanced” in favour of the Yes argument and against anything that seems a bit Londonish.
“The guy tweeted two separate Yes and No arguments, how on earth can he be more unbiased?”
I don’t think anyone used those tweets as evidence of bias.
@Tom – We’re not obsessed just observant
link to wingsoverscotland.com
link to tinyurl.com