The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



The Captain’s Abyss 190

Posted on November 30, 2013 by

The realisation that the No camp’s reaction to the independence White Paper has been based on a massive, scarcely-believable misunderstanding/misrepresentation of reality has thrown a new light on all sorts of things from the past week.

bhole12

The most recent “BLACK HOLE!” story is a case in point.

Read the rest of this entry →

The Holey Bible 104

Posted on November 20, 2013 by

Keen media watchers could have been forgiven for stifling a yawn this week as the Scottish press leapt eagerly on a think-tank report which bravely professed itself able to see no less than half a century into the future of the Scottish economy.

bhole1

The Scotsman’s take was fairly typical. But it had a certain ring of deja vu.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,915 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Does it not dawn on you, Geri, that it IS possible to have a legitimate concern for, and indeed “a…” Oct 21, 16:26
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “So, James Che, no Scottish Commissioners, no Scottish Jurists drafting the Scottish Treaty, no Queen Anne as titular head of…” Oct 21, 16:23
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Facts about: 1. the economic drain from Scotland because of the “Union”; 2. the legal proof that the “Union” is…” Oct 21, 16:07
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “John Swinney has today commented “Successive UK Governments have failed to establish a dedicated sovereign wealth fund using North Sea…” Oct 21, 15:37
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Geri – I can’t imagine what demons you’re fighting (or actively embracing) which would cause you to write something like…” Oct 21, 15:16
    • Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 21 October, 2026 at 1:47 pm I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll…” Oct 21, 14:49
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “without even doing the slightest research, there are any number of possible reasons why the albertans voted that way -…” Oct 21, 14:15
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Sam was this case not related to holding slaves in Scotland i.e Knight himself who had been brought here by…” Oct 21, 14:00
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “I’ll tell you what’s likely within the next 30 years. You’ll be deid and forgotten. As for Canada being annexed…” Oct 21, 13:47
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Attaboy, James. Don’t you let Geri and Confused steal all the glory.” Oct 21, 13:37
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “give us your insights about alberta then, arse-piece. Looking further ahead, due to climate change cold northern lands will become…” Oct 21, 13:20
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “with the SNP in charge of “independence”, why would you need propaganda anymore – they are winding up the operation,…” Oct 21, 13:18
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, It is true that we are able to hold legal witness to the annexation of Scotland in 1707.…” Oct 21, 13:17
    • James on Faces In Sand: “Prick.” Oct 21, 13:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““shovelling yoon propaganda” Calm, mature reflection would lead one to consider that if that is true, and it is also…” Oct 21, 13:08
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Both Scotland and England supposedly remain as the Sovereign Countries that lend to the foundation of the State of Great…” Oct 21, 13:04
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Nobody has much to say about Alberta’s thumping rejection of Indy. All that oil, King Charles on their banknotes, and…” Oct 21, 12:54
    • Confused on Faces In Sand: “propaganda conduit, BBC Scotchland-shire, is being gutted – I hope all those journos have been made aware of their options…” Oct 21, 12:31
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “Our findings have already been confirmed by expert legal opinion too, James. Scotland’s unlawful annexation and takeover (i.e. colonization) by…” Oct 21, 12:27
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Legal establishment issues: see caltonjock’s piece today about Lady Dorrian.” Oct 21, 12:15
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “Thank you Northcode – that is exactly right!” Oct 21, 11:48
    • Oneliner on Faces In Sand: “No, it should read ‘United Kingdoms’ As in United States; United Arab Emirates etc.” Oct 21, 11:46
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “OK. If anything, I think my eyes are out on stalks. I have to go out now. I’ll keep my…” Oct 21, 11:37
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code. Scotland remains a sovereign country signed up to a voluntary union with and as does England if you…” Oct 21, 11:36
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aha! So “with one bound, Scotland was free”, morphs into “with one (encumbered, hence smaller) bound, Scotland was away, laden…” Oct 21, 11:32
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Scotland is no longer a minor player, it has become a Catalyst Country.” Oct 21, 11:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Logically” There you go, Northy, I’ve pinpointed the flaw in your post. No other cant is prepared to use logic.…” Oct 21, 11:23
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Hatey, Your eyes seem to be closed to what is happening with protests, riots and objections to the wrong direction…” Oct 21, 11:19
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “Correction: “Untied Kingdom” Should read: “United Kingdom” A Freudian slip, perhaps.” Oct 21, 11:15
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Perhaps you could answer a question for me, Alf. If you take yourself off into an empty room with your…” Oct 21, 11:11
  • A tall tale



↑ Top