The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


A thing we just noticed

Posted on July 22, 2012 by

In the debate over whether the SPL buys the broadcast rights to SFL games featuring Rangers, we’ve just spotted a rather interesting quirk. Sevco Scotland Limited was accepted to the SFL as an Associate Member, and will not be eligible for full Member status for four years. Rule 19 of the SFL Constitution says:

“An Associate Member shall have no financial interest in the assets of the League and shall not be accorded any voting rights.”

We assume “the assets of the League” include its media rights. (Indeed, as far as we can see those would be pretty much the only assets jointly owned by the League.) Rule 19 would seem to suggest that if the SFL does want to sell “Rangers” games to the SPL – or indeed to anyone else – not only will the newco not be entitled to a vote on the matter, but it won’t be entitled to any of the money either.

We haven’t seen anyone else mention this. It seems quite significant.

(EDIT 23-7-12: See comments for SFL response.)

15 to “A thing we just noticed”

  1. Seb Co says:

    Or maybe your ‘assumption’ is just incorrect.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “Or maybe your ‘assumption’ is just incorrect.”

      Feel free to suggest why.

      Reply
  2. andy_ek says:

    the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL”

      Pay attention, Andy. SFL membership != SFA membership. I know it’s all a bit hard to follow (follow), but try to keep up, eh?

      Reply
  3. Jim Torbett says:

    Err you seem to be forgetting our membership was transfered. We are not a new club.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Who is “we” in this case, Jim? I ask because you’ve given a “celticfc.net” email address, and also because NOBODY’S membership has been transferred anywhere as yet.

      Reply
  4. Appleby says:

    Amazing to see the passion and intrigue that this game inspires. And the gamer/computer geek types are meant to be bad but football seems worse. Rev Stu  makes a comment about a new team and the financial failings and drama of an old one and people take it very much personally.

    Reply
  5. FCF1983 says:

    Rangers are dead and don’t ever forget it ! Ha ha !

    Reply
  6. Christian Wright says:

     
    andy_ek says:
    July 22, 2012 at 3:05 pm

    “the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL “

    Clearly that is demonstrably false. Below is the first sentence of the statement released by Scottish Football League chief executive David Longmuir. A link to that statement is thoughtfully provided in the article. The truth shall set ye free, and is but a click away. I commend it to you.

    “The member clubs of The Scottish Football League have today voted to willingly accept The Rangers Football Club as an associate member of The Scottish Football League.” (the emphasis is mine)

     

    Reply
  7. jimmyarab says:

    Newco are being treated as oldco by the SFA ( 12 month transfer ban etc) so I don’t think it’s worth getting excited about any further trangressions that occur.
    Newco shouldn’t even be in the SFL.
    Until the ‘leaders’ at the SFA and SPL resign then it’s not really worth following Scottish football as it’s totally corrupt and a dark stain on our country. A total waste of money.
    I watched the Open golf today and saw true sportsmanship and integrity.

    Reply
  8. Barbarian says:

    A few people (not here) are making the assumption that Newco will race up the leagues and get into the SPL in 3 years. They need to win Div 3 first…….

    Reply
  9. charlie says:

    i can’t see them doing that at the moment (and i suspect ‘coistie’ can’t either). I wonder how fast the fan base will evaporate on the second season in that division, I know Hibs would be in trouble if we hadn’t gone straight back up when we went down.

    cheers charlie

    Reply
  10. McHaggis says:

    Some of you obviously don’t watch too much div 3 games… I’ve seen Cowden through div 3, 2 and 1 and am fairly certain that the new Rangers will stroll div 3 and probably 2 as well. Div 1 will be tougher but by that time with spl just around the corner and a team being constructed for that purpose, it is likely they would be challenging at the top.

    Div 3 is very much a different game, but a combination of talented youth and one or two old guard should see them through. Seriously, div 3 is not that much better than the huffing and puffing fat part timers i see hoofing the ball in the Sunday league in my local park.

    Reply
  11. Doug Daniel says:

    “Seriously, div 3 is not that much better than the huffing and puffing fat part timers i see hoofing the ball in the Sunday league in my local park.”
     
    That just makes it even worse that Aberdeen have regularly been punted out of cup competition by such sides. How Aberdeen lost to Queen’s Park a few years ago I’ll never know.

    Reply
  12. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    I dropped the SFL a line this morning asking them to clarify Rule 19. They replied saying that “The ‘assets of the League’ relate to any financial assets should the SFL be wound up”. For super-extra clarity I mailed back saying “So not the media rights, then?”, and got another response reading “Wouldn’t have thought so”.

    Probably best if we file that one under “semi-authoritative”, then.

    😀

     

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,989 Posts, 1,252,667 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““Still read the rag though” Me too, the online version. Some good journalism occasionally, although hell will freeze over before…” Oct 17, 11:13
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “Yeah, got some sympathy with this, the way what are not unreasonable calls for at least recognition of past crimes,…” Oct 17, 10:32
    • James on The fight about to come: ““Prick”?” Oct 17, 10:21
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Many Scots who are related to the descendants of the thieving, genociding Scottish colonisers of the Canadian province of Alberta…” Oct 17, 09:54
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““turn German into inhuman gibberish” In our own time, we see the same (quite successful) attempts to turn English into…” Oct 17, 09:04
    • Willie on The fight about to come: “Small diversion on a Saturday evening. Now we know budgets are tight and we know that transport for some children…” Oct 16, 22:44
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “« The Nazis were only too anxious to secure the lustre of Thomas Mann’s presence and the prestige that mere…” Oct 16, 21:00
    • sam on The fight about to come: “I should have added that GERS is produced independently of Scottish ministers.” Oct 16, 19:37
    • sam on The fight about to come: “Who knows Mr Swinney’s feelings? Margaret Cuthbert was on the panel responding to that Committee inquiry into GERS. Here is…” Oct 16, 19:33
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “What glass house pray am i supposed to inhabit? A purely rhetorical matter forsooth. & All depends on the provenance…” Oct 16, 19:00
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “Indeed you are quite confused, confused. Jesus was a Jew, orthodox by today’s standards. Perhaps you are a Marcionist and…” Oct 16, 18:49
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Wasn’t he that bloke who was considerably to the left of Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell?” Oct 16, 18:38
    • factchecker on The fight about to come: “A good question, Sarah. Possibly one factor is because John Swinney remembers this Holyrood committee meeting where he was sitting…” Oct 16, 18:06
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Ah! But of course, wilfully blind, crass hypocrisy comes as standard with these permanently affronted “types”. Expecting moral consistency is…” Oct 16, 17:56
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “I bet you’ve suspected for years that yer Dad’s nae yer real Dad. False flags, eh?” Oct 16, 17:44
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““you do seem a cohort of embittered personages eyes reddened by a surfeit of prejudice” Seriously? Yet you have nothing…” Oct 16, 17:41
    • Lorncal on The fight about to come: “Indeed, Northcode, I agree with you on your use of anomaly as it applied to Mr Salmond, the person, not…” Oct 16, 17:22
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “Happily the SSRG Conference is on youtube so we can listen to some very sensible, intelligent, informed people speaking. The…” Oct 16, 17:18
    • J Robertson on The fight about to come: “Really ? what could possibly go wrong ?” Oct 16, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Meh. Well, your garden’s looking a tad shite from where I’m standing TURABDIN. Glass houses and all that. 😀” Oct 16, 16:25
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “@Capt Caveman, Hatey, Northcode, On the basis of observation you do seem a cohort of embittered personages eyes reddened by…” Oct 16, 14:43
    • Confused on The fight about to come: “describing zionism as “racism” is pretty mild – I mean if you “really want to go there” tribalists, being tribal,…” Oct 16, 13:14
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “An interesting article about the crisis tearing the English Greens apart: https://unherd.com/newsroom/greens-zionism-row-could-tear-the-party-in-two/ The author essentially claims that it’s the Corbynist…” Oct 16, 12:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Easy for you to say, SBS, but then you’re forgetting just how much grift and lucre there is to be…” Oct 16, 12:24
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the map of this island looks rather different come 2100” There’s defo gonna…” Oct 16, 12:10
    • Minceheid on The fight about to come: “Hatey McHateface says: 15 October, 2026 at 6:47 pm Dinna fash, MH, I’m in no position to draw my lines…” Oct 16, 11:42
    • Dick Wall on The fight about to come: “A stopped clock is right twice a day. The continued shambles that is the UK today could build support for…” Oct 16, 11:32
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “Everything from the past effects the present but people pick and choose what matters. How many on here would agree…” Oct 16, 11:22
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Aww, “Hatey’s Middle East friends”. I wonder who they might be. Surely not the people who have done more for…” Oct 16, 08:27
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““protofascist” I believe that to be a new word on Wings BTL. I’m certain it’s just another of those words…” Oct 16, 08:11
  • A tall tale



↑ Top