The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


A thing we just noticed

Posted on July 22, 2012 by

In the debate over whether the SPL buys the broadcast rights to SFL games featuring Rangers, we’ve just spotted a rather interesting quirk. Sevco Scotland Limited was accepted to the SFL as an Associate Member, and will not be eligible for full Member status for four years. Rule 19 of the SFL Constitution says:

“An Associate Member shall have no financial interest in the assets of the League and shall not be accorded any voting rights.”

We assume “the assets of the League” include its media rights. (Indeed, as far as we can see those would be pretty much the only assets jointly owned by the League.) Rule 19 would seem to suggest that if the SFL does want to sell “Rangers” games to the SPL – or indeed to anyone else – not only will the newco not be entitled to a vote on the matter, but it won’t be entitled to any of the money either.

We haven’t seen anyone else mention this. It seems quite significant.

(EDIT 23-7-12: See comments for SFL response.)

15 to “A thing we just noticed”

  1. Seb Co says:

    Or maybe your ‘assumption’ is just incorrect.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “Or maybe your ‘assumption’ is just incorrect.”

      Feel free to suggest why.

      Reply
  2. andy_ek says:

    the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL”

      Pay attention, Andy. SFL membership != SFA membership. I know it’s all a bit hard to follow (follow), but try to keep up, eh?

      Reply
  3. Jim Torbett says:

    Err you seem to be forgetting our membership was transfered. We are not a new club.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      Who is “we” in this case, Jim? I ask because you’ve given a “celticfc.net” email address, and also because NOBODY’S membership has been transferred anywhere as yet.

      Reply
  4. Appleby says:

    Amazing to see the passion and intrigue that this game inspires. And the gamer/computer geek types are meant to be bad but football seems worse. Rev Stu  makes a comment about a new team and the financial failings and drama of an old one and people take it very much personally.

    Reply
  5. FCF1983 says:

    Rangers are dead and don’t ever forget it ! Ha ha !

    Reply
  6. Christian Wright says:

     
    andy_ek says:
    July 22, 2012 at 3:05 pm

    “the membership will be TRANSFERRED! So wont be associate membership, they have a current full membership under SPL and that full membership will be transferred to SFL “

    Clearly that is demonstrably false. Below is the first sentence of the statement released by Scottish Football League chief executive David Longmuir. A link to that statement is thoughtfully provided in the article. The truth shall set ye free, and is but a click away. I commend it to you.

    “The member clubs of The Scottish Football League have today voted to willingly accept The Rangers Football Club as an associate member of The Scottish Football League.” (the emphasis is mine)

     

    Reply
  7. jimmyarab says:

    Newco are being treated as oldco by the SFA ( 12 month transfer ban etc) so I don’t think it’s worth getting excited about any further trangressions that occur.
    Newco shouldn’t even be in the SFL.
    Until the ‘leaders’ at the SFA and SPL resign then it’s not really worth following Scottish football as it’s totally corrupt and a dark stain on our country. A total waste of money.
    I watched the Open golf today and saw true sportsmanship and integrity.

    Reply
  8. Barbarian says:

    A few people (not here) are making the assumption that Newco will race up the leagues and get into the SPL in 3 years. They need to win Div 3 first…….

    Reply
  9. charlie says:

    i can’t see them doing that at the moment (and i suspect ‘coistie’ can’t either). I wonder how fast the fan base will evaporate on the second season in that division, I know Hibs would be in trouble if we hadn’t gone straight back up when we went down.

    cheers charlie

    Reply
  10. McHaggis says:

    Some of you obviously don’t watch too much div 3 games… I’ve seen Cowden through div 3, 2 and 1 and am fairly certain that the new Rangers will stroll div 3 and probably 2 as well. Div 1 will be tougher but by that time with spl just around the corner and a team being constructed for that purpose, it is likely they would be challenging at the top.

    Div 3 is very much a different game, but a combination of talented youth and one or two old guard should see them through. Seriously, div 3 is not that much better than the huffing and puffing fat part timers i see hoofing the ball in the Sunday league in my local park.

    Reply
  11. Doug Daniel says:

    “Seriously, div 3 is not that much better than the huffing and puffing fat part timers i see hoofing the ball in the Sunday league in my local park.”
     
    That just makes it even worse that Aberdeen have regularly been punted out of cup competition by such sides. How Aberdeen lost to Queen’s Park a few years ago I’ll never know.

    Reply
  12. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    I dropped the SFL a line this morning asking them to clarify Rule 19. They replied saying that “The ‘assets of the League’ relate to any financial assets should the SFL be wound up”. For super-extra clarity I mailed back saying “So not the media rights, then?”, and got another response reading “Wouldn’t have thought so”.

    Probably best if we file that one under “semi-authoritative”, then.

    😀

     

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,991 Posts, 1,253,514 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: “How odd, Spartan! Your posts get longer and longer as you care less and less.” Nov 6, 18:37
    • Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: ““think outside the box constructed for us” As I recall, constructed by no less a personage than the late, great…” Nov 6, 18:31
    • Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: “Michty! Friday comes aroond quick. James hame all alane again. Hope yer maw’s left ye a puckle o’ denners in…” Nov 6, 18:04
    • Aidan on Vibecoding A Better World: “Thanks James – really interesting comment.” Nov 6, 17:52
    • Connie Davidson on Vibecoding A Better World: “I watched the debate on the National You Tube channel between Alf Baird and Robin MacAlpine and I was enraged…” Nov 6, 17:33
    • James on Vibecoding A Better World: “But Adrian, as anyone above the age of 6 reading ony of your posts can tell – you lack ony…” Nov 6, 15:40
    • James on Vibecoding A Better World: ““Prick”.” Nov 6, 15:37
    • Spartan 117 on Vibecoding A Better World: “Well Sam, we can look at several factors. The insistence on alignment with the myriad of EU rules, despite being…” Nov 6, 14:41
    • MaryB on Vibecoding A Better World: “Robin is behaving according to Alf’s thesis, as part of the middle class political class who, like the SNP, are…” Nov 6, 14:34
    • Spartan 117 on Vibecoding A Better World: “Ah, so you’re retired then. Or semi? That explains the amount of time you waste on here and why you’re…” Nov 6, 14:24
    • James Che on Vibecoding A Better World: “Agentx, May I refer you to The Law Society of Scotland of ratification of the 1707 treaty of union being…” Nov 6, 14:03
    • 100%Yes on Vibecoding A Better World: “I’ve said for a long time that their are individuals within the YES/Independence movement more interested in Money than the…” Nov 6, 13:47
    • Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: ““he’s not daft” Crivens! Where could this possibly lead us if we but had the courage to follow? “it doesn’t…” Nov 6, 13:02
    • Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: “Very wise, MH. Too much risk of encountering a muckle, bearded loon self-identifying as a spoon. I’d be a bit…” Nov 6, 12:49
    • Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: “Cheers Spartan. My lowly spirits are always uplifted when somebody as important and busy as you takes time out of…” Nov 6, 12:40
    • Hatey McHateface on Vibecoding A Better World: “So true, Mary. Robin needs to extend the olive branch to Lavrov. Maybe praise him as a peacemaker? Perhaps that…” Nov 6, 12:32
    • sarah on Vibecoding A Better World: “Thanks for the heads-up, MaryB. Robin’s attitude is inexplicable – he’s not daft and he is pro-independence so why criticise…” Nov 6, 12:25
    • Captain Caveman on Vibecoding A Better World: “Indeed, Spartan, we are agreed once again. Like you no doubt, if there’s one thing I cannot stand, it is…” Nov 6, 11:40
    • MaryB on Vibecoding A Better World: “Now on Salvo and Liberation Scotland Facebook.” Nov 6, 11:37
    • Spartan 117 on Vibecoding A Better World: “Don’t forget Stormont, which has the full 5 Bananas rating on the Banana Republic scale. While we’re at it, the…” Nov 6, 11:26
    • Spartan 117 on Vibecoding A Better World: “Agreed CC. The Dutch model is the most workable and with the best outcomes. The US is great if you…” Nov 6, 11:23
    • Spartan 117 on Vibecoding A Better World: “No Hatey, I’m not in a strop thanks. Much more important things to worry about than what some random on…” Nov 6, 11:18
    • agentx on Vibecoding A Better World: “The Ratification Timeline The political process that legally bound the two nations followed a specific sequence: • 22 July 1706:…” Nov 6, 11:05
    • Minceheid on Vibecoding A Better World: “Hatey McHateface says: 5 November, 2026 at 8:55 am I see nothing stopping “muesli eater” becoming a valid, protected identity…” Nov 6, 10:30
    • James Che on Vibecoding A Better World: “One would surmise seeing as there is NO treaty of Union between the old parliament of Scotland and the parliament…” Nov 6, 10:19
    • MaryB on Vibecoding A Better World: “There’s a very good debate hosted by The National (maybe someone could put up the link), between Robin McAlpine and…” Nov 6, 10:14
    • James Che on Vibecoding A Better World: “The parliament of Great Britain as a new created united state could only come into being for its projected conclusion…” Nov 6, 09:51
    • Captain Caveman on Vibecoding A Better World: “The NHS really does serve to demonstrate to the establishment of the world: “This is how NOT to do universal…” Nov 6, 09:39
    • James Che on Vibecoding A Better World: “As stated many times, Scotlands old parliament, never agreed or entered a 1st May 1707 treaty of Union with the…” Nov 6, 09:21
    • James Che on Vibecoding A Better World: “North Code, Then narrative is that the Scottish parliament was closed, ended, made void, dissolved, Sine Die, on the 28th…” Nov 6, 09:11
  • A tall tale



↑ Top