The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The Tallinn Protocols

Posted on August 25, 2013 by

Alert readers will be aware that we like to occasionally have a bit of light-hearted satirical fun pointing out the gulf in numbers between grassroots campaigners on the Yes side of the independence debate and their counterparts in the No camp.

tataysidehouse

But we’ve been gathering evidence of a much more sinister side to the phenomenon.

It’s not entirely new. A couple of months ago we carried a report of authorised Yes activists being intimidated out of a fair near Elgin with implied threats of violence, on the grounds that the “Better Together” campaign had failed to put up any advocates of its own and the presence of Yes Scotland therefore created an imbalance.

But recently we’ve been hearing more and more from pro-independence campaigners that the same tactic – often with the support of sympathetic Labour councillors – has been deployed across the country. Unable to rustle up any supporters to argue its case, the No camp instead uses its own weakness as a weapon, demanding that Yes stands be removed (or refused permission in the first place) simply because their Unionist opposite numbers refuse to turn up.

Scottish football fans will find the scenario familiar. In 1996 the Scotland national side made the long journey to Tallinn in Estonia for a World Cup qualifying match. The Estonian team famously didn’t show, on the grounds that their FA had objected to the start time being brought forward due to fears over inadequate floodlighting, and the match was abandoned moments after the Scots kicked off.

forfeit

Under FIFA regulations, the outcome should have been clear – the awarding of a 3-0 victory to Scotland. But for reasons never properly explained (no “force majeure” had been involved, like the Estonian team coach being in a car crash or some such), the Federation instead ordered the game to be staged again at a neutral venue, where it ended up in a 0-0 draw, depriving Scotland of two precious points.

Clearly, this favourable outcome struck a chord with “Better Together”. The following are just some typical examples of the various different strategies used by No campaigners to suppress debate that we’ve been sent this month.

JOHN McGUIRE, SOUTH AYRSHIRE

“You asked for any instances where YES folk were harassed at any public events. Me and some others were challenged at Ayr Flower Show on Friday August 2nd. Three of us (with Blue waistcoats) were on the main drag through Rozelle Park, not inside the event, and an officious lady asked us to move. Our answer was no, with a smile. We then took some hassle from John Walker (the chairperson of the flower show).

We were accused of being in breach of The Representation of the People Act, (nonsense), barricading the entrance (definitely not), we were blocking the main thoroughfare (definitely not). Told that were not allowed not allowed to distribute leaflets and he was away to get the Police. They never appeared after 2 hours.

So essentially while we refused to move we were courteous and invited him to go get the police. Heard later that the Tories complained we were aggressive and rude, a complete lie.”

FAY SINCLAIR, DUNFERMLINE

“Last week we had our stall at South Dunfermline Gala cancelled with less than 24 hours notice. I had booked and paid for the stall weeks in advance, making it clear it was for Yes Scotland and would involve handing out pro-independence information about the referendum to members of the public. I was told this was fine as long as it was not party political.

The evening before the event the secretary of the organising committee (who had taken the booking) called me to say we weren’t allowed to be there. She told me it was because it wouldn’t be balanced as the other side would not be represented and that they’d received several complaints. We registered our disappointment but stayed away and focused on leafleting the surrounding area instead.

After I complained to the press about feeling pressure had been put on the committee for political reasons, I received my refund and a letter stating that the committee had taken a majority decision and that it was because it was a “children’s gala” and not political. But the way it was handled seems to be a tactic employed by Better Together across the country.

Yesterday local activists had a stall set up outside Pittencrieff Park in Dunfermline for the annual Bruce Festival. We’ve asked the past two years (last year as Yes and the previous year as SNP) to have a stall in the venue but were refused. Last year we set up a table just outside the gates and had no complaints, so decided just to do that again this year.

About an hour after setting up our stall on the street outside the park gates event security approached us and asked us to leave. We refused on the grounds that we were exercising our right to free speech and were entitled to campaign on a public street. They threatened to call police to have us removed and at one point called over a passing policeman who was very disinterested as we were clearly doing nothing wrong.

The local councillor for the area (Neale Hanvey) was there and managed to speak to the organisers, who said it was because Better Together weren’t also represented that we couldn’t be there. In the end they agreed to “let” us keep our stall outside the park gates if we agreed not to turn up on Sunday. So the gazebo will stay in the box and we’ll be out with leaflets in hand and Yes balloons to give out to the kids to hopefully flood the venue with our message. This blatant attempt at censorship will not be accepted.

We had a fantastic response from the public today with hundreds of flags given out, probably close to 1000 pieces of pro-independence literature freely taken and dozens of people signing the Yes declaration.

People want access to the facts to make an informed decision about their country’s future and while more of the scare stories peddled by the No campaign crumble by the day they are clearly running from the debate, working behind the scenes to deprive people of access to information rather than engage and present their case. It only makes activists like myself more determined to make sure people do have the information they need to vote Yes next year.”

JOHN HENDERSON, KIRRIEMUIR

“We set up a Yes shop in Kirriemuir recently to promote the cause, and in the window we display leaflets from Labour for Independence, Women for Independence, the Greens and the SNP as well as Yes materials. It’s really worth a look if you’re ever in the area. Recently, however, a local busybody has complained to the cooncil that we’ve put up a sign (a Yes campaign banner), repainted the shop ( from dull maroon to blue and white) and changed the use from shop to office, all without permission.

The cooncil have instructed us to take down the banner (done), and apply retrospectively for permission to change the colour scheme and change of use. All this will cost us £300, money we don’t have.”

BETH WATT, MUSSELBURGH

“After seeing BT leaflets displayed outside the large lecture hall in Queen Margaret University last year, I asked permission to display some Yes leaflets/literature. I was told by the gentleman in charge of this kind of thing that I would be unable to, as they do not allow political materials in the uni. When I told him that there were BT leaflets outside the main lecture hall he explained that these were left over from some conference (I have no idea what the conference was and had not seen any info on it via intranet).

I complained about them allowing the BT leaflets to be displayed (whether they were leftovers or not – rules is rules) and I was told that if I wanted to do any sort of campaigning I should ask the student union. I went straight over the the SU and spoke to the president, who told me the same thing – can’t leave any Yes stuff cos it’s not fair on the No side.”

These don’t seem to be isolated incidents. After Kirriemuir another Yes shop, this time in Dunoon, was targeted by Loyalist vandals, and when the local newspaper covered the story Orange activists attempted to incite nail-bomb attacks on its office.

yesdunoon

A regular occurrence (the most recent example we were sent happened at Davidson Mains in Edinburgh earlier this month) seems to be police being called to investigate Yes stands “blocking” streets, which invariably results in no action and officers having their time wasted as well as campaigning being disrupted.

And of course, we shouldn’t forget other attempts to use threats of prosecution to silence discussion of events “Better Together” would rather went undiscussed.

We sympathise with the No camp’s inability to motivate people to tramp the streets promoting continued Westminster rule over Scotland at a time when a UK government of unprecedented inhumanity is dismantling our post-war society and freedoms at a pace even the Telegraph can’t stomach. But it’s not an excuse for trying to subvert democratic free speech and debate by underhanded and bullying means.

As we were writing this post, we received another email from Fay Sinclair:

“We were back today with Yes balloons and leaflets but no stall and the artistic director started shouting at me (a heavily pregnant woman) in the street claiming we were ‘hijacking’ his event. When told Bruce fought for independence his response was ‘No, Bruce fought for money!’ He was very aggressive so an official complaint will be made.

Local councillor spoke to head of Dunfermline Delivers which runs the event and we’re setting our stall up outside the gates again today. A less assertive team may have been intimidated into leaving but we knew our rights and stood our ground.”

Just over a year after the farce in Tallinn, Scotland secured qualification for World Cup 1998. Estonia didn’t make it. With the anti-independence campaign already reduced to such desperate measures as these in their attempt to keep the truth from the Scottish public, we have a good feeling about a year into Yes Scotland’s future too.

189 to “The Tallinn Protocols”

  1. The Water Beastie says:

    Remembering one of the famous chants from that match (“There’s only one team in Tallinn”), it may indeed be that the comparison with on the ground support, is a valid one for the Referendum…..

    Reply
  2. Marcia says:

    You have placed her to just within her ward boundary. Well done.

    Reply
  3. sneddon says:

    I guess this is the ‘they come to fight you’ stage.  It amazes me they actually think this tactic would even work on anyone let alone a bunch of stroppy independinistas 🙂 Well done all.   Panic and fear from the onionists.  I agree I’m having a good feeling as well into the last year of campaigning.

    Reply
  4. ianbrotherhood says:

    Well done Fay Sinclair, and a’body else who stood their ground.

    Reply
  5. Hazel Lewry says:

    It’s about time all the Yes campaigners began video-ing these desperate attempts to curtail free speech on Scotland’s streets.
    Get them compiled into one documentary style film and on YouTube.
    Then we keep doing it to let the rest of the country see and fully understand just how hard UKOK are working to stifle the debate.

    Reply
  6. sneddon says:

    Just left a polite commet on the Dunfermline Delivers FB page.  link to facebook.com
     
    It also vexs me as it’s funded out of my tax money as well.

    Reply
  7. Albalha says:

    Perhaps we’ll see the headline …..
    ‘Festival director claims Bruce only cared about the loot’

    And on Kirriemuir surely YES Scotland can help them out with the £300?

    Reply
  8. jim mitchell says:

    Back in June of this year, myself and a bunch of other Nat’s set up a YES stall in Sauchie Main Street, outside of, but not blocking the entrance to, a shop, which fortunately for us was/is owned by one of our members, now I have been involved in this kind of thing for the SNP for years, for the first time ever two police officers got out of their car and asked us what we were doing and did we have permission, something which has NEVER happened before, when we pointed out that we didn’t think any was needed as we were not blocking access to anywhere or badgering people to take stuff and it was obvious that we new the rules,, they made it clear that there was no problem, when we introduced them to the man who is not only a local councilor but the council leader, they became very genial!
    I believed them when they said they were just checking, but after reading this, I can’t help but wonder.

    Reply
  9. jim mitchell says:

    Hazel Lewry, thatis a great idea, my vid/cam goes with me next time.

    Reply
  10. Jiggsbro says:

    They’re fighting dirty now and when the polls move away from them, they’ll fight even dirtier. And all the while, the MSM will be scrupulously even-handed in complaining about the dirty fighting, by making out both sides are as bad as each other.

    Reply
  11. Adam Davidson says:

    Love Hazel Lewry’s suggestion about videoing all contact attempting intimidation of Yes supporters. There is no law against this filming. Will be very effective when linked to extensively on YouTube.

    Reply
  12. David Fletcher says:

    Voice your complaints. 
    link to m.facebook.com

    Reply
  13. iain taylor (not that one) says:

    SLab did this exact thing for an independence debate run by the students at Adam Smith College in the spring. Refused several invitations to put up a panel member. Then just before the day of the debate Lindsey Roy MP (yes, SLab) tried to intimidate college management into cancelling it because the panel wouldn’t be balanced.
     
    Fife Free Press (Johnston Press, like the Hootsmoan) carried a bland story on it, ignoring Roy’s antics and the straw poll after the debate (an win for “Yes”).
    The week after they printed a letter from an SSP representative telling the whole story. Who reads the letters page in the FFP?

    Reply
  14. les wilson says:

    A must read in the Guardian today, a must read by all of us!
    link to theguardian.com
    Sorry REV, please allow the link,it is worthwhile .

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “Sorry REV, please allow the link,it is worthwhile.”

      Um, I always allow links. Although I tweeted about that particular article at about 6.30am.

      Reply
  15. Jamie Arriere says:

    One suggestion for anyone manning a stall anywhere, is to make sure there is someone with a smartphone  capable of filming any exchanges (borrow one if needs be). Any footage of this intimidation in action would be even more powerful than the Rev’s article.

    Reply
  16. seoc says:

    If the BT opposing crowd were invited to participate at such events (in writing) then if they choose not to appear it’s hardly unfair.

    Reply
  17. Heather McLean says:

    ” By popular demand, the triumphant return of Lonely Better Together Lady!”
     
    Hehehe!! Love it! ????????

    Reply
  18. HeatherMcLean says:

    I have absolutely NO IDEA why multiple question marks appear after any post I make when I use my iPhone , so apologies in advance to any grammar Nazi’s out there who may be rading this!

    Reply
  19. Macart says:

    They’re really worried now and they should be. Two years of relentless PR and our vote, far from being smashed, is beginning to creep forward. The efforts of the YES campaign in the street deserves the best of back slaps and online… Better not, he’ll only blush.
     
    What goes round, comes round.

    Reply
  20. Bella Caledonia says:

    It won’t work. The Bruce Festival was awash with Yes balloons and saltires. Great atmosphere despite the organisers. Well done to Fay and others.

    Reply
  21. Seasick Dave says:

    Heather
     
    I suppose that the iPhone put the apostrophe in Nazis as well? 🙂

    Reply
  22. Seasick Dave says:

    Bella Caledonia
     
    Any pictures that the good Rev can use?

    Reply
  23. Braco says:

    Bella Caledonia,
    just out of interest, what did you make of your editor Kate Higgins’ performance on tv the other night pressuring the YES Scotland campaign and leadership over the hacking scandal and ‘hunnergate’? Didn’t want to raise it over on Bella as it seemed rude somehow. Very interested in the Bella take on it though.

    Reply
  24. Albalha says:

    @Braco
    Sure BC can answer for themselves but think at the time they tweeted something about her ‘havering’.

    Reply
  25. Braco says:

    Albalha,
    It was a genuine question as I don’t follow twitter. It’s good to hear. Thanks
    Still like to hear from them about it though as it has gone completely unmentioned over on their Website.

    Reply
  26. Jeannie says:

    Had a similar experience earlier this year in Kirkintilloch – was asked by a female security guard to move away from the entrance to the Regent Centre shopping arcade (just me on my own) and was told I had crossed an invisible line and I had to stand outside of the invisible line, not inside.  Trying not to laugh, I moved over to the other side of the road and someone came out from a cafe and asked me to move away from there, too.  I wasn’t even at the door.  I was only handing out leaflets too.
     
    I’m also aware that our group was told to leave the Kirkintilloch Gala by the local Labour council leader – they didn’t even have a stand, were just walking about.  I understand they just ignored her. 
     
    Can’t believe how willing and complicit some people are to suppress our hard-won, democratic rights to free speech.  I’m sure people in some parts of the world would view this with disbelief.

    Reply
  27. faolie says:

    @les wilson, your link’s broken. Here it is here: link to archive.is.
     
    For those that missed the Rev’s memo, copy the link url, go to http://archive.is and paste the link into the box, hit enter, then copy the archive url. Aside from not having to visit whichever MSM rag’s website to read said article,  it also archives it, even if the rag then deletes it from their site.
     
    Good article tho. As it says: As such, the Yes campaign should simply have said the £100 was merely “expenses” and then asked if someone in the opposition campaign was guilty of handling stolen goods, a serious criminal act. Isn’t that exactly what we’re talking about here?

    Reply
  28. Hazel Lewry says:

    Re: Guardian article. Error 404 Page Not Found!
    .
    As for video recording and taping encounters – just make sure you let them know this is what you’re doing, and keep our side civil and polite!

    Reply
  29. Jeannie says:

    Took up Morag’s suggeston and bought Murray Ritchie’s “Scotland Reclaimed”.  Mr. Jeannie got to it first though, but he’s just shown me something pertinent – with respect to the 1999 Scottish Parliamentary Election, Murray Ritchie writes, “Labour strategy seems clear enough.  It is to meet each and every statement made by the SNP with an avalanche of ridicule and accusations of dishonesty.  I just wonder if this overkill will not eventually backfire”.
     
    They’re obviously falling back on former strategy – “It’s an old trick, but it might work again”

    Reply
  30. Albalha says:

    From the link in the article I’ve tried to register to read the Dunfermline Press article on the banning last week. For the life of me can’t get past the anti spam detector and its words to decipher.
    Grateful if anyone has access to it and could post it. apologies if I’m missing something very obvious from the link.

    Reply
  31. Seasick Dave says:

    Jeannie
     I’m sure people in some parts of the world would view this with disbelief.
     
    I’m in the Far East and I’m aghast!
     
    I loved the invisible line routine. You just couldn’t make it up. Thanks Kirkie Labour.

    Reply
  32. Albalha says:

    @Braco
    I don’t use twitter but now and then have a wee recce to see, at times like that, what folk are saying.

    Reply
  33. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    For those that missed the Rev’s memo, copy the link url, go tohttp://archive.is and paste the link into the box, hit enter, then copy the archive url.”

    Even easier than that – if you drag the “bookmarklet” button onto your bookmark bar, all you need to then do is press the button when reading a web page to get the archive URL immediately.

    Reply
  34. Archie [not Erchie] says:

    Dunfermline is the place of my birth and I am proud of it. Fond memories of School Gala marches into the Glen clutching white cake boxes with the obligatory foody goodies inside. Proud to be associated with King Robert the Bruce who fought for Scottish Independence.
    Reading Fay Sinclair’s piece regarding Dunfermline events makes me so sad.
    These anti-independence organisers, committees and others of the same ilk will be consigned to the midden of miscreants next year. How dare they, in their positions of self appointed authority, decide Scotland’s independence by interfering with free speech. You have shame on you and it will never be forgotten.
    Keep up the good work to Fay and others.
     
     

    Reply
  35. Seasick Dave says:

    I suppose the other side of the coin is that, if its an SNP council area, then Better Together should be welcomed in to community events.
     
    There is absolutely nothing to be gained from doing the same as them.
     
     
     

    Reply
  36. DanTDog says:

    Just deposited my own groat’s worth on the Dunfermline Delivers FB page… the more the merrier! As an exiled Fifer myself, I find the organisers’ attitude disgusting, and disturbing, if not entirely surprising.

    Reply
  37. Jeannie says:

    Do you know, I just don’t buy this argument – we can’t allow one side as the other side isn’t here – what’s that about?  Who are these people who are taking it upon themselves to act as some kind of pretendy “electoral commission”.  Why should they feel it’s encumbent on them to provide space for both sides at any cultural event or ban one side just because the other side isn’t putting in an appearance?
     
    Why are they acting as a replica electoral commission?  How did they get it into their heads that they were required to do this?  It’s ridiculous – ultimately it would mean neither side would be in a position to provide information to the public without coordinating it in advance with the other side.  How is that supposed to happen?

    Reply
  38. pmcrek says:

    Any chance we can sort out and publicise a crowd source to raise £300 for John Henderson in Kurriemuir so they can sort out their shop? Would be happy to contribute.

    Reply
  39. Albalha says:

    @jeannie
    Agreed. Utterly bizarre that we seem to have, throughout the whole of Scotland, dictatorial committees who, in many if not most cases, will be funded to some extent from public funds.
     
     

    Reply
  40. faolie says:

    @ Albalha can’t get past the anti spam detector
     
    You need to answer their wee survey first to access any article. But here’s the link to the page anyway:
    link to dunfermlinepress.com

    Reply
  41. Iain says:

    @Seasick Dave
    ‘I suppose the other side of the coin is that, if its an SNP council area, then Better Together should be welcomed in to community events.’
     
    Absolutely, with the added bonus that BT being given a chance to make their positive case for the Union usually gets a few Yes votes in the bag.

    Reply
  42. Gallowglass says:

    link to imageshack.us
     
    link to imageshack.us
     
    This is going to become more frequent. 

    Reply
  43. Jeannie says:

    @dantdog
     
    Sounds like the same sort of folk who run Aberdour Community Council.  Maybe the Yes folk in Dunfermline could exact their revenge by taking a leaf out of this guy’s book – I’ve posted this before, but it’s a great way of expressing your contempt for the local “establishment” when they get carried away with themselves.
    link to youtu.be

    Reply
  44. Gallowglass says:

    Those images above are the Davidson Mains in Edinburgh pictures taken by myself.
     
    I sent a note to the site when it happened, and I’ll be visiting all the others to see if it happens.
     
    All it takes is one phone call.  It was evident even as the police drew up that they were not blocking the pavement, yet they still spoke to the stall holders all the same.
     
    Harassment via a third party as far as I am concerned.
     
    FREE SCOTLAND!

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “I sent a note to the site when it happened, and I’ll be visiting all the others to see if it happens.”

      Man, I looked EVERYWHERE for those. Gmail is awful. Edited them in as links now.

      Reply
  45. Albalha says:

    @faolie
    Many thanks for pointing out what should have been obvious to me! Duh.
    Good to see they reported it and empty chaired the Council responsible, who may have hoped, by not commenting, they’d kill the story.

    Reply
  46. Gallowglass says:

    You should put the pics in the article Rev. for those who don’t read the comments (I don’t always it has to be said)

    Reply
  47. Weedeochandorris says:

    les wilson says:
    25 August, 2013 at 2:56 pm

    A must read in the Guardian today, a must read by all of us!
    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/25/toughen-up-scottish-nationalists-mckenna 
    The page seems to have disappeared link takes me to message 
    Sorry – we haven’t been able to serve the page you asked for!

    Reply
  48. David Smith says:

    So, according to the Torygraph today, you’re a peddler of simplistic propaganda Stu.
    Why are you trying to muscle into a market that the MSM have already cornered.
    We demand answers! 😉

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “So, according to the Torygraph today, you’re a peddler of simplistic propaganda Stu.”

      Wait, what now?

      Reply
  49. panda paws says:

    The police came out to speak to us on both occasions I’ve been at a Yes East Ren stall. We couldn’t set our stall up Cowan Park in Barrhead for their gala day – a Labour councillor had been apparently agitating against it despite it being a public park. We set up across the road, the police came and we’d a French journalist there who saw it all.

    Speaking about silencing folk, over at the Guardian a number of comments by pro-independence supporters are “disappearing” on Severin Carrell’s articles. Not modded, but literally deleted without a trace.

    Reply
  50. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    On the Dunoon shop incident I manage it and there has been some interesting fallout from it.  
    Firstly it was not the shop that was threatened with nail bombs . It was David Goodwin the editor of the excellent online Cowal Courier newspaper who had covered the vandalism in his daily news bulletin.

    We had three instances of pro union Orange Lodge leaflets being stuck to our shop window with some sort of powerful adhesive. We had to use industrial solvent to get them off. We wrote to Orange Lodge HQ in Glasgow (which address was on the leaflets) asking the lodge to remove them. A gentle man for the Orange Lodge came to talk to us and after an apology  suggested that it was nobody from the local Orange Lodge as the leaflets in question had been circulated in their thousands at marches across Scotland.

    I accepted this. He went on to say that many members of the Lodge will be voting YES.
    Since that point we have had quite a number of chaps in wearing Rangers tops getting YES car stickers and badges and I met a whole group of them coming back from Ibrox two Saturdays ago saying they were voting YES.
     
    (Ally McCoist is a YES man)
    So all is not as it seems

    Reply
  51. ianbrotherhood says:

    George Robertson – veteran of untold thousands of demos, hustings and stalls, knocker of millions of doors – demonstrates the cat-like reflexes of a genuine street-fighter. No ‘Project Feartie’, oor George –


     

    Reply
  52. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Firstly it was not the shop that was threatened with nail bombs “

    Yes, the sentence points out that it was the newspaper that got the threats.

    Reply
  53. Weedeochandorris says:

    Ok found it thanks Faolie.  Very interesting and have to say I agree that turning the other cheek is not always the best response. There is definately a time to hit back twice so you won’t be slapped again – if we’re not already at that point we soon will be.  

    Reply
  54. Rooster says:

    Surely all that needs be done to ensure fairness is to allow the other side, whoever that may be, the oppurtunity to attend. Since their attendence is outwith the control of anyone but themselves it is surely unfair to deny admittance to anyone else based on it.

    Reply
  55. Joseph Curran says:

    I think it’s becoming clear that this kind of intimidation will become worse over the next year, so is it now time that the YES campaign issued legal advice over this kind of bullying?  They should also have a legal team ready for the volunteers to contact if they have any problems setting up stalls.

    Reply
  56. Fay-Yes says:

    Thanks for all the support for our stall in Dunfermline.
    I’ll be making complaints to the organisers and press about how we were treated, particularly when there was a very aggressive man shouting in my face. I don’t think that shows the festival in a very good light to be shouting loudly “Bruce just fought for money” at a pregnant lady as people are entering the venue! It’s a shame as the Bruce Festival is a great event and is planned to be part of next year’s Homecoming Scotland. I can only hope the organisers either learn lessons or are changed for then.

    Reply
  57. Boorach says:

    Can anyone tell me how I can get my hands on some Yes leaflets?
     
    I’ve tried YesScotlland but though they were helpful all I actually got were printouts of some of their on-line publications. Fine for me but not a lot of good for distributing.

    Reply
  58. Boorach says:

    pmcrec

    Any chance we can sort out and publicise a crowd source to raise£300 for John Henderson in Kurriemuir so they can sort out their shop? Would be happy to contribute.

      
    Good idea, count me in…. any chance of you organising something Rev?

    Reply
  59. Albalha says:

    And Armed Forces Day in Stirling next year, Hammond hopes it’ll help their Unionist cause
    The national event for Armed Forces Day is to be held in Stirling next year ahead of the independence referendum.
    UK Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said the event would help underline the strength of the union.
    Scotland’s veterans minister, Keith Brown, said he was not concerned with the UK government’s motivation for bringing the event to Scotland.
     
    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  60. cirsium says:

    @pmcrek – good idea.  I would be happy to contribute.  John Henderson- Kirriemuir over to you.

    Reply
  61. gavin lessells says:

    O/T
    All is not doom and gloom at Pacific Quay.
    Ken MacDonald conducted a fair debate on the programme “Headlines” at 0900 this morning including Gerry Hassan. The existence of this site, Newsnet and Bella Caledonia were mentioned and the organiser of the latter gave an excellent interview and explanation for the success of these blogs with YES supporters.
    Unfortunately, as I sail a wee boat and have not been to a course at my local library, I am technically unable to provide a link to “Headlines”
    Perhaps some kind technocrat might do the business for me?

    Reply
  62. Ian Grant says:

    Gallowglass, thanks for posting the pictures you took of our Edinburgh West Davidson’s Mains stall. In fact, the police were very reasonable and supportive. They vindicated our right to run the stall, and said that the phone caller was wasting police time. The individual who called the police was, however, rude and threatening, and it could have been very frightening for anybody not accustomed to rabid NO supporters.

    Reply
  63. Linda's back says:

    Albalha says:
    25 August, 2013 at 5:20 pm

    And Armed Forces Day in Stirling next year, Hammond hopes it’ll help their Unionist causeThe national event for Armed Forces Day is to be held in Stirling next year ahead of the independence referendum.
     
     
    Absolutely Marvelous and it is taking place next June at the same time as the official opening of the new Bannockburn visitor centre.
    Stirling’s Provost, Mike Robbins, spoke of the city’s pride in becoming the focus of next year’s events will be in line for an OBE for services to the Union.

    Reply
  64. Albalha says:

    @gavinl
    Here it is, I thought the media discussion was good but they didn’t do very well on the hacking/Bulmer story. Even the chap from the Herald didn’t know the real story, or of course chose not to disclose it.
    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  65. gavin lessells says:

    Albalha
     
    Many thanks for that. It is the media discussion which is well worth a listen. Ken MacDonald has made it plain in two consecutive programmes of the anti Independence bias of the Scottish press. From the evidence sofar available from Pacific Quay I think he could be putting his head on the block as far as Boothman is concerned. It really should listened to without prejudice.

    Reply
  66. Albalha says:

    @gavinl
    I think we can be sure that Ken Mc is not only a YES man but doesn’t give a flyer about senior management.
    His reading out of the text about him being supportive of YES, running into a Labour bully and the programme being renamed ‘Nedlines’, priceless.

    Reply
  67. Chic McGregor says:

    @Dave Hill
    “Ally McCoist is a YES man”
    Do you mean he has come out in favour of yes to independence? or was it a punny?
     
    If he is in favour of independence then he is the first I’ve heard of those who co-signed the anti-independence letter/advert which the unionists payed to appear in the Scottish press some years ago.

    Reply
  68. Andy-B says:

    Cant leave any leaflets or have a stall promoting the YES campaign
    because it would be unfair on the BT camp who have no representation
    surely thats the fault of the no camp, for not having any representation, as for threats from the O/O despicable barely describe them and their tactics.
     
    Surely the YES should be allowed to at least hand out flyer, to people in a public area, flyers for everything from sunbed shops to carwash sites are handed out every day outside premises in Scotland.
     
    it seems BT have begun intimidation tactics across the country, using the O/O members and other pro-unionists, and yet the MSM try and make Nationalist, look like brown shirts.

    Reply
  69. Anon Sailor says:

    May I offer the services of our Yes Bouncers and Minders for indy.

    Reply
  70. Angus says:

    You should have a phone recording app on standby for these confrontational occasions just so you can prove who is doing the shouting-just passing on a lesson learned that really worked.

    Reply
  71. HeatherMcLean says:

    Boorach says:
    25 August, 2013 at 5:13 pm

    Can anyone tell me how I can get my hands on some Yes leaflets?
     
    I’ve tried YesScotlland but though they were helpful all I actually got were printouts of some of their on-line publications. Fine for me but not a lot of good for distributing.

      Try your local SNP office, they may have some that they will give you .. why not volunteer to help out when they go leafleting?Boorach

    Reply
  72. Gallowglass says:

    “Man, I looked EVERYWHERE for those. Gmail is awful. Edited them in as links now.”
     
    Hehe, no problem.  I feel a bit famous now!  Thank you. 🙂

    Reply
  73. orkers says:

    @Dave McEwan Hill
    Not all Rangers Supporters are Unionist arseholes Dave. A lot of us are football Fans who are also going to vote ‘Yes’.
    Thanks for your heartening post.

    Reply
  74. Red squirrel says:

    Sorry OT and with a health warning! Still trying to get my head around this one but the headline is 3% drop in No vote since Jan.
    link to express.co.uk

    Reply
  75. Albalha says:

    Earlier in the thread @Braco was asking what Bella Caledonia thought of Kate Higgins ITV performance. Anyway just thought I’d have a look at her blog and on the horror of the deaths off Shetland she says, the oil and gas industry is ‘at risk’, oh come on. 
     
    This weekend, four families are in mourning, thousands of co-workers are shaken and one of Scotland’s most important industries is at risk.

    Reply
  76. Murray McCallum says:

    You would hope, in addition to the internet, that the public spaces of Scotland were an equal place for willing campaigners to inform the public.
     
    As well as their strategy of draining the hope out of Scots with their constant stream of miserableness, it also seems the No campaign are trying to suck the oxygen out of free speech.

    Reply
  77. orkers says:

    @Albalha
    I signed up as a follower of her blog, but have grown so disenchanted that I’ve recently unsubscribed.
    She’s become, or perhaps always, was a bit suspect.

    Reply
  78. Jen says:

    I agree with Jeannie at 4:21, where is the requirement stated that both sides have to be present in the local community for gala and festivals.  Seems like a form of self censorship or people are feart of being seen as Yes supporters.  The Scottish Cringe in action whilst I think their is an element of prevention from Labour people within the council system and general supporters of the Union. 

    It’s like saying you can’t have a girl band at the gala day if there is no boy band. 

    In my opinion, its stopping people obtaining information that could make their mind up.  Are the Unionists afraid to state the positive case for the Union of Equals?  I think so and it shows their lack of support. 

    Reply
  79. Tony Little says:

    Just been watching the AD interview on HARDtalk.  Amazing!  If he gets flustered to such a degree from a relatively gentle interviewer, no wonder he runs scared of AS!  YES should take clips for this and get them out to a wider audience.

    Reply
  80. scottish_skier says:

    RE Angus Reid and the Express.
     
    Haven’t seen the tables yet but another poll consistent with No dropping back and Yes rising slowly.
     
    Also, within variance (+/- 3%), once again consistent with Panelbase.

    Reply
  81. HandandShrimp says:

    So the message is that because Better Together could not organise a piss up in a brewery and have no on the ground activists then Yes Scotland, which is well organised and does have activists, can’t campaign?  That doesn’t make a blind bit of sense. I think this needs to be taken to Holyrood and for some ground rules laid down here.

    Reply
  82. handclapping says:

    @Red squirrel
    You can see why they didn’t want to write about space monsters when they had their very own 848,000 (16% of 5,300,000; I presume most of those polled and answering would want to take their children with them.) exodus as a result to have to justify 🙂
    Its also worth noting that the Express could only afford a poll of 530 so the results are likely to be even dodgier than the normal.
    Way to go Rev and the Wings crowd funders!

    Reply
  83. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Chic
     
    I read fairly recently that Ally had declared for an Independent Scotland with the Queen as head of state like New Zealand or Canada.  

    Reply
  84. Albalha says:

    @ScottishSkier
    What is Angus Reid polling? A reputable organisation? 549 seems a rather small sample.

    Reply
  85. Castle Rock says:

    So will the Unionists now be demanding that there should be EDL\BNP\SDL stalls at an anti fascist protest before it can go ahead?
     
    Never thought it was possible but Unionism\Bitter Together have sunk to a new low.

    Reply
  86. scottish_skier says:

    What is Angus Reid polling? A reputable organisation? 549 seems a rather small sample.
     
    It’s a bit on the low side (error +/-4.4%) but AR are fine. Much better than Yougov or MORI.
     
    I await the tables before concluding any further than I have. 
     

    Reply
  87. Boorach says:

    Heather
     
    no such thing as an SNP office in this area and haven’t seen any street stalls etc advertised on YesScotland ergo the need to do some solo work

    Reply
  88. Murray McCallum says:

    Look, I’ve always said Scotland could have free speech.  Any country in the World could have free speech. The question for me is, should Scotland have free speech?
     
    Sorry, a bit of Darling logic for everyone.

    Reply
  89. handclapping says:

    @Albalha
    Canadians.
    Yes.
    Every poll has the chance to be completely wrong, the larger the sample the less chance of this happening. The smaller the poll the dodgier may be the results from it eg ~1000 for +- 3% on a nation of 5,000,000 but 300 for the same on a constituency of 70,000.

    Reply
  90. Albalha says:

    @Boorach
    Where do you live?
    I don’t hink it’s about an SNP office but a YES Scotland presence.
    Unless you’re somewhere like Jura I can’t believe there’s not a YES bunch of folks relatively near to you.

    Reply
  91. orkers says:

    ‘Chic I read fairly recently that Ally had declared for an Independent Scotland with the Queen as head of state like New Zealand or Canada’
    I’d be pleased beyond measure if he actually had said this. It would be a magnificent weapon on a few football forums I know.
    Can you provide some proof Dave?

    Reply
  92. Albalha says:

    @ScottishSkier
    Oh I do enjoy your analysis, let us know when you see the results.

    Reply
  93. scottish_skier says:

    +- 3% on a nation of 5,000,000 but 300..
     
    And people should remember the +/- % is precision, not accuracy. +/-3% does not mean the e.g. 34% Yes is within 3% of the actual number. What it is, is within +/-3% of what you’d get if you sampled another identical demographic sample the same day with the same question using the same methodology/weighting. Precision is how close you are to hitting the same spot each time. Accuracy is how close you are to the actual number.
     
    You can be super precise and totally inaccurate. A thermometer that measures the melting point of ice within +/- 0.0001 C is extremely precise, but if not calibrated and reading 5.0001 C, it’s inaccurate. 
     
    There is no way to know which methodology is the most accurate. For that, you’d need to sample everyone and compare how well you did with your 1000 sample approach. So pollsters wait on actual election outcomes and see how well they did.
     
    A year in advance, polls are fairly pointless. At least actual numbers are. Trends are of interest though.

    Reply
  94. Vambomarbeleye says:

    Armed forces day.
    Need to get as many veterans as possible on parade wearing YES badges above their medals.

    Reply
  95. jim mitchell says:

    So scottish_skier, re your last post, a technical analysis of this poll then would sum it up in terms of it being, more unionist mince?

    I just love it when we go into the detail

    Reply
  96. scottish_skier says:

    By pointless I mean Y/N polls. The example being MORI. They publish figures showing apparent super support for the union, but then say ‘actually, only 56% of people are set on what they want to vote with 44% still making their minds up so all to play for.’
     
    The more probing questions such as those in the WoS poll are far more interesting at this stage.

    Reply
  97. Albalha says:

    @Vambomarbeleye
    If you have any influence then I suggest you go for it. I’m absolutely not the Armed Forces type.

    Reply
  98. Boorach says:

    Albalha
     
    Am in Easter Ross and from what I see on YesScotland events listings there is little or nothing N of Inverness

    Reply
  99. scottish_skier says:

    mince
    Not mince, just not a good predictor of what will happen. Far too far out. See my note on MORI – the union favourite due to high ‘shy Yes’ factor.
     
    Unless you have info on who is dead set, who is open to changing their minds etc, then a straight Y/N on what you’d vote ‘tomorrow’ is not a great deal of use at this stage, other than for trends.
     
    The Yes was ahead of the N in 2011. It has been there before. People who support Yes have been saying no for reasons I have speculated upon before.
     
    I predict a closing of Y and N by the end of the Year / early 2014. This will mainly be due to N support dropping rather than Yes rising massively. If all goes well, then Yes will start to take off as we head towards September with a clear lead going into the referendum. 

    Reply
  100. Vambomarbeleye says:

    Why ! is any one surprised at the dirty tricks. It was all ways going to be thus. Look around at what happened in Eastern Europe and Western Europ for that matter.
    We have been lied to for years. Why would it stop now. What about the SNP guy that was found dead at Kintail in very iffy circumstances.
    Expect to be hacked, obstructed lied to etc. Do record and keep all evidence. We don’t have to stoop to their level but we do have to be able to prove what they are up to. So evidence and name and shame.
     

    Reply
  101. Vambomarbeleye says:

    @ Albalha
    Funny you should say that. I will see what can be done.
     

    Reply
  102. faolie says:

    So did anyone else who read the Express’s poll have this vision of long lines of refugees slowly making their way across the border with their goods and chattels, heading for the transit camps in Carlisle and Newcastle? Well with comments like “However, our poll suggests a sovereign Holyrood would be left in charge of around three million people who wish to remain citizens of a foreign nation.” what else are we to infer? Just hilarious.
     
    That page deserves to be archived: link to archive.is

    Reply
  103. Albalha says:

    @Boorach
    A quick search finds in Dingwall  link to my.mutterings.co.uk
    Though where exactly are you in Easter Ross?

    Reply
  104. alexicon says:

    As regards the cynical attempt by Westminster to use the arms forces day at Stirling for political reasons, wouldn’t it be a good idea for the local YES campaigners, as well as outside assistance, to have a large presence at this union flag waving jamboree. 
    To fly the Independence flag for Scotland.

    Reply
  105. sneddon says:

    ‘Need to get as many veterans as possible on parade wearing YES badges above their medals.’   I’m sure our friends over at ‘Veterans for Independence’  are already planning  to.
    Let’s be easy on the BT people eh?  They can’t get boots on the ground as they are busy on the phones compaining to the police and undertaking ‘Shouting at pregnant women’ courses.  🙂

    Reply
  106. scottish_skier says:

     “However, our poll suggests a sovereign Holyrood would be left in charge of around three million people who wish to remain citizens of a foreign nation.” 
     
    3 million really well off people. All that income from oil, whisky, power, food and drink exports etc with 2.3 million less to provide public services for.
     
    Woo-hoo!
     
    Pity the Express talks a lot of shite.

    Reply
  107. Chic McGregor says:

    Dave Hill & Orkers
    “I read fairly recently that Ally had declared for an Independent Scotland with the Queen as head of state like New Zealand or Canada.  ”
    I hope that is correct but not so much because I think he is a ‘big feather’ more because McCoist was the signee I was most surprised to see in that ad. always wondered if it was just to please his mentor Smith.  Always thopught he had that wee bit more about him smeddum-wise.
     
    BTW here is the infamous list of signees.
     
    Sir Alex Ferguson Alex McLeish Bobby Lennox Graeme SounessWalter SmithCraig BrownAlly McCoist Billy McNeill Roy Aitken Tommy GemmellCraig Levein Sandy Jardine Bertie AuldJohn Greig Gary McAllister 

    Reply
  108. PRJ says:

    When setting up your stall why not have two, the other for the No campaign. A simple sign stating “Invited but Nothing to Contribute” should suffice.

    Reply
  109. Chic McGregor says:

    cut’n’paste of the list was screwed by the comment editor, sorry.
     

    Reply
  110. Boorach says:

    Albalha
     
    Am in Tain, there is a local SNP branch (closed for summer) and last High St stall had zero info to distribute. 
     
    Thanks for the link, that event was back in Jan but I’ve gleaned a phone number from it so will give it a try first thing.
     
    Am fed up with inaction and will fly solo if necessary as I could cover Alness – Bonar Bridge/Dornoch hence need for materials

    Reply
  111. Macsenex says:

    Re Armed forces day: time for all veterans who are nationalists and those of us whose late arenas were service people and wear their medals with pride under YES banner.

    Reply
  112. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Chic
    Odd , because Craig Brown has contributed to our Saltire Newspaper and certainly made pro independence remarks in the past. I suspect the list is out of date

    Reply
  113. Albalha says:

    @Boorach
    I’m not a paid up member of YES Scotland but here’s another link
    link to yesscotland.net
    Anything to get us over the line, that’s my quest. Noy sure if the above link helps or not.
     

    Reply
  114. sneddon says:

    Chic- Thanks for posting the list.  It’s been a while but I’ve never seen a list of so many irrelevant turnip heads in one place.  I’m so happy most of them don’t live in Scotland and hopefully when we get our independnece the remainder will bugger of as part of the ‘Express’ exodus 🙂

    Reply
  115. fitheach says:

    @Boorach
    Send us an email via the contact form http://yeshighland.net/contact-main and we will put you in touch with other Yes people in your area. Volunteers always most welcome

    Reply
  116. ianbrotherhood says:

    @Boorach-
     
    Not meaning to be a doom-and-gloomer, but be careful if you’re going solo – few weeks ago, at street-stall on a very busy Ayr High St, we had a nasty one with a homeless dude (a fit-looking ex-services type, in his sixties) who went off on one when he heard us shouting about the Bedroom Tax – ‘why didn’t ye’s help me twenty-three year ago? Eh? Eh?’ He zeroed-in on one of the lads, had him backed-up against a shop-window and looked very close to head-butting him as the rest of us shifted in between them. He did leave eventually, but not before announcing exactly what he thought of us and issuing threats to each of us in turn. I don’t believe he even knew who were were, what party we represented. We just happened to be there when he was in the mood to have his buttons pushed. These guys can crop-up anywhere, and they’re dangerous. I dare say you can look after yourself, but be careful – always best to have someone else with you, for corroboration if nothing else.  

    Reply
  117. Albalha says:

    I will eat a fair few of my wide collection of hats if Ally McCoist declares openly and publicly for independence.
     

    Reply
  118. Albalha says:

    Oh and @boorach rather rank that your local Tain SNP branch shuts down for the Summer, don’t they know there’s a vote to win? And people wonder why I’ve no time for organised politics.

    Reply
  119. fitheach says:

    @Boorach
    I don’t know why my URL didn’t get converted to a clickable link in my previous post but here it is again our Yes Highland contact form

    Reply
  120. The Flamster says:

    Jeannie, I too bought Scotland Reclaimed and I am over half way through it.  Talk about DeJa Vu. I feel as if I am reading in present time as it’s the same tatics being used over and over again. Apart from people no longer with us nothing has changed. Great read though – you will enjoy it.
    Also according to book – Craig Brown is a Yes.

    Reply
  121. ianbrotherhood says:

    McCoist would be a cracker to have on-board. 
     
    Best McCoist story I’ve heard is the one (he tells, allegedly) where he and Durrant happened to find themselves in an earthy establishment in Amsterdam. 
    Durrant: How much is it for a w**k?
    Lass: Sixty Guilders (or Euros, whatever)
    McCoist: How much is it if you’re not a w**k?

    Reply
  122. Albalha says:

    @Macsenex
    If you’re a veteran and minded to vote YES then anything you can do to promote that on Armed Forces Day has to be welcomed. Hail Alba.

    Reply
  123. handclapping says:

    The 300 sample size for a constituency is an interesting number. If you go canvassing you’ll get 6 or 7 responses in an evening so a squad of 9 will get 60. With an average constituency of 60,000 in 5 wards, then 45 people spread over the wards will get a “poll” of that constituency in an evening. So not only doe you get 100 new supporters and the chance to move 130 up the Don’t Know ladder but HQ gets a real insight how the campaign is going in that constituency for free.

    Reply
  124. Thepnr says:

    Re the Kirrimuir Yes shop, I believe they may already have received any financial assistance they required through the help of LFI. See the article for 14th August here:
     
    link to facebook.com

    Reply
  125. sneddon says:

    Albalha- ‘I will eat a fair few of my wide collection of hats if Ally McCoist declares openly and publicly for independence.’
    Is that with salt n’ sauce or ketchup.  Stranger things have happend(usually at sea but you never know)  🙂

    Reply
  126. handclapping says:

    Does anybody know how the vote will be taken? Will it be by constituencies or by Councils? It will be more expensive but quicker by constituencies but slower and cheaper by Councils. Will it even be done overnight?

    Reply
  127. Boorach says:

    Albalha
     
    Thanks for all help. Wasn’t at the games but street stall on same day as mentioned earlier… pitiful.
     
    Ian
     
    Don’t worry about me, also ex services and I back down for no-one. Might well quiver in my shoes but am a thrawn b’stard! 🙂
     
    Fitheach
     
    Email on way, thanks

    Reply
  128. ianbrotherhood says:

    @Boorach-
     
    More power to ye mister. You’re team-handed anyway – loads of us right there in spirit, always.

    Reply
  129. Lydia says:

    Perhaps we should at future events offer to provide a “No” campaigner so that it’s “balanced”? Can take it in turns to hold a “No” balloon and ask ridiculous off-topic questions.

    Reply
  130. Re indy sites Vasi used to be a good link but appears to have died a death which is pity maybe someone with the ability could do something similar for Yes sites reading some of the above posts.
     
    link to twitter.com

    Reply
  131. Boorach says:

    Thanks Ian
     
    Hail Alba

    Reply
  132. alex taylor says:

    Boorach
    I picked up 6000 Independence Rally leaflets from the Yes office in Glasgow last week. Is that what you’re looking for?

    Reply
  133. Boorach says:

    @ Alex
     
    sounds like it, anything to hand out on the High Streets, start conversations and hopefully mobilise others in the area.

    Reply
  134. Edulis says:

    I was at the Glen Urquhart games yesterday and the Yes gazebo was in evidence. It got a steady stream of engaged people. I was on another stall but managed to have a chat with one of the volunteers. When I reamed off WoS as one of my must see blogs, I was surprised to find out that he had never heard of it. So there are committed Yes people who haven’t caught up with the revolution that is happening on places like Wings.

    Reply
  135. Heather McLean says:

    PRJ says:
    25 August, 2013 at 8:13 pm

    When setting up your stall why not have two, the other for the No campaign. A simple sign stating “Invited but Nothing to Contribute” should suffice
    Now that sounds like a cunning plan! 🙂 

    Reply
  136. Heather McLean says:

    PRJ says:
    25 August, 2013 at 8:13 pm

    When setting up your stall why not have two, the other for the No campaign. A simple sign stating “Invited but Nothing to Contribute” should suffice.

      Sounds like a cunning plan! I like it!

     

     

    Reply
  137. Bubbles says:

    @ Edulis
     
    i joined my local SNP branch a few months ago and I also mentioned WoS and NNS and nobody had heard of either! That was a couple of months ago though but still…. I was the most informed at that meeting. Which is sad really.

    Reply
  138. Thepnr says:

    Coming back to the original article I just wanted to say that every sane person in this country should be disgusted by any form of censorship, however that seems to be one tactic of what can only be described as very small minded people.
     
    I would also like to say thanks to those brave souls mentioned above who are willing to argue for their beliefs on behalf of all us supporters despite the aggressive opposition.
     
    Lets face it is our job to let the people of Scotland know just what is going on, it shouldn’t be too hard to persuade them that the MSM and the establishment is totally against giving them a free choice in so far as it will first try to poison their opinion through lies and deceit.
     
    I think we have to give up on hoping a Knight on a white horse will come charging into BBC and make everything fair. Lets just take up the mantle ourselves and get out there and talk to people day after after…………..

    Reply
  139. fitheach says:

    @Boorach
     
    Just received your email and sent off a reply.
     
    You should ask the Rev if he can remove your email address from this thread as otherwise you will get loads of spam.

    Reply
  140. ianbrotherhood says:

    @fitheach-
     
    I posted my e-mail address here maybe four, five times (a couple of weeks ago) while gathering names for the Glasgow meeting – didn’t get anything dodgier than the usual shite from payday-loan sharks etc.

    Reply
  141. Boorach says:

    @ Rev
     
    Could you please remove my email from above post but let Alex Taylor have it should he ask.
     
    my thanks and apologies for inconvenience

    Reply
  142. Beastie says:

    Vambomarbeleye says:
    25 August, 2013 at 7:35 pm

    Armed forces day.
    Need to get as many veterans as possible on parade wearing YES badges above their medals.

    Absolutely. Brilliant idea, and I’d be very surprised if Veterans for Scottish Independence hasn’t got a similar line on it. I am ex-military myself and have no medals, because I was only ever eligible for one and I didn’t think involvement in the second Gulf War was anything I would want to wear a medal for so I refused the campaign medal. But I’ve got a wee badge that says ‘Armed Forces Veteran’ on it pinned to my suit and that would be well augmented by a Yes badge. I’d be delighted to turn up in Stirling on Armed Forces Day next year just so Phillip Hammond could have an apoplectic fit.

    Reply
  143. Albalha says:

    Yes and I’ve posted my e mail recently on this site too, and it’s still out there in quarantine, nothing untoward has unfolded. By all means be careful but let’s not buy into scary, scary land. Reds under the beds, bogey men etc, etc. Fear of fear is a tragedy.
    If they want to get you they will and won’t be standing by the WoS website to catch you out.
    Please let’s stay real, as they say, or at least once said.

    Reply
  144. The Rough Bounds says:

    It might be a good idea if you are refused entry to anywhere to place your Yes Scotland stall (because there isn’t a Bitter Together stall) to get a Yes supporter to pretend that he/she is the No supporter and wants to set up inside the park beside the Yes stall. He/she, once they are inside the park or wherever, should then behave like an absolute pratt (which is what No supporters are) and give out a load of baloney to the punters.
    That has got to be worth a laugh.

    Reply
  145. Albalha says:

    @Bubbles
     I thought you were posting from Canada, where are you in Scotland?

    Reply
  146. Calgacus says:

    I know people who swore they would leave Scotland if we voted Yes in 1997.
    They are still here.

    Reply
  147. CameronB says:

    I am surprised that Yes activists would consider undertaking anything on their own, I would assume against the advice of the official Yes team. I would be even more surprised if the official Yes team has not issued guidance to campaigners, in terms of procedural and legal does and don’ts. If a campaign which always intended a heavy reliance on grass-roots support failed to do so, I would simply ask why?

    Reply
  148. Albalha says:

    @CameronB
    Bloody good point, if I may say so, you’d think YES Scotland would help coordinate requests …..interesting.
     

    Reply
  149. CameronB says:

    @ Albalha
    I have yet to contact my local Yes group, so I am totally unaware of what they are doing re. guidance to activists. From what I have been reading here though, it would not appear to be enough. For example, Yes sponsored events without documentary video footage as standard practice, FFS.

    Reply
  150. Jamie Arriere says:

    No real problem with the Armed Services Day in Stirling – nice of them to give the Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders a ceremonial duty to do. Might be a good idea to suggest a future SDF will have a future for the A&SH which is more than just guard-changing ceremonies and posing for tourists.

    Reply
  151. alex taylor says:

    Boorach
    Already emailed you. So, ‘let’s do a thing’.

    Reply
  152. Rusty Shackleford says:

    Rather ironic that unionists in Scotland have been complaining about roads being blocked when their compatriots have been doing the very same thing (and far worse) in Northern Ireland over the last year. 

    Reply
  153. Paula Rose says:

    I’ve registered with BT to run a stall in my area if they wish, at least they won’t be able to claim no volunteers 🙂

    Reply
  154. Doug Daniel says:

    It shouldn’t come as any surprise to us that this is going on. As soon as Blair McDougall accused Yes supporters of dirty tricks campaigns a few months back, that should have been recognised as an admission that they were indulging in dirty tricks themselves. Accusing your opponent of that which you’re doing yourself is one of the standard tactics of deceitful campaigns like Better Together, after all.
     
    Maybe people should start asking to have a stall to promote BOTH sides of the debate, and just take along a handful of BetterTogether leaflets to put on the table. Can’t think how else to get around this sneaky trick, since we can’t force them to turn up.

    Reply
  155. Paula Rose says:

    Perhaps we should encourage a grass roots bt campaign, and all get together and help them be better campaigners – after all they’re not doing very well. I could have a knit-in.

    Reply
  156. Chic McGregor says:

    @Dave hill
    ‘”Odd , because Craig Brown has contributed to our Saltire Newspaper and certainly made pro independence remarks in the past. I suspect the list is out of date”
     
    I did wonder about pa Broon because of his stout opposition to Scots playing in the GB Olympic team, he was convinced that was a real threat (via Blatter) to the Scottish national team.  Maybe that was a turning point for him, but  I never saw a definitive statement from him pro Indy.  Would be delighted if he has.
     
    Also note that Billy McNeil stood as a candidate recently for the pensioner’s party which, at least for the 2007 election seemed pro indy but not sure of their current stance.
     
    The list is certainly old (2003 election? ) but accurate.
     
    The more who are converts from it the better.

    Reply
  157. Boorach says:

    My thanks to all for your encouraging words last night. I am now in touch with folk in the area and further afield. I am also working on getting some leaflets for distribution, thanks Alex.
     
    CameronB
     
    I’m getting on in years and was around a long time before health and safety was a glimmer in the government’s eye, wouldn’t know how to start a risk assessment or whatever it’s called. We are the grassroots and if we all wait for someone else to add the fertiliser we will lose by inertia.
     
    For me ‘now IS the day and now IS the hour’ if we don’t win it this time I may not see the next referendum. I’ve faced rioters on the streets of Hong Kong, Belfast and Londonderry and spent a year in the Borneo jungle during the confrontation in the sixties so I’m damned if I’ll be faced down by anyone with opposing views on the future of my country.

    Reply
  158. ianbrotherhood says:

    @Boorach-
    No knowing where your travels will take you, but if you let us know where you’re likely to be pitching-up I’m sure I’m not the only one who’d be keen to pop along and see you. Here’s me e-mail:
    ian@stevenston4.fsnet.co.uk
    Good luck mister!

    Reply
  159. Albalha says:

    @Boorach
    Great to hear it’s all worked out and yes as @ianb says let folks know what, where you’re up to. My e mail sitting in quarantine.
    If I’m up Tain way, which happens, I’ll give you a shout. I may even help deliver a leaflet or two!

    Reply
  160. Boorach says:

    I wish you would all just shut up! I can take aggression, confrontation etc. but theres something about kindness that goes straight to the ducts. Thanks all 🙂

    Reply
  161. John Lyons says:

    Well done yes Dunfermline, I was Robert Bruce at pittencrief park and the yes badges and balloons were very noticeable inside the park, even interspersed among the 12,000 visitors as they were. Bleep up the good work!
     
    just a query, but since the park is a public place and not actually owned by Visit Dunfermline, couldn’t you just set up in the park anyway?

    Reply
  162. Albalha says:

    @JohnLyons
    Now that’s cool, ‘I was Robert the Bruce’ …… on the parks they’re local authority but outside is public and okay, if that makes sense, as long as you’re not blocking any access.
    That’s my understanding.

    Reply
  163. Barontorc says:

    Of course the answer to this;  ‘no BT stand, so no YES stand permission’ is for the local council to supply information desks/stands to represent both views of the referendum debate, which can then be manned by supporters/delegates as a public information source.
     
    The BT people seem to have no idea just how  debilitating to their cause it is to refuse to discuss their side of things. To then demand by threat and police involvement that the YES side also be silenced is farcical and political suicide. They have all but packed it in and are leaving it to the democratically corrupt MSM and BBC.
     
    Is it any wonder the strategists in YES see no reason whatsover to interrupt them and just stay watching from the side, quietly conserving their powder?

    Reply
  164. John Lyons says:

    Here’s another thought, the SNP don’t have any representation in the House of Lords. Does that mean, as it’s clearly one-sided and biased, we can just close it?

    Reply
  165. John Lyons says:

    Albaha, it’s not as glamourously as it sounds. Wear 4 stone in weight of chain mail for about five hours and pick your way through the horse apples for the jousting…. On the otherhand, having people bow as you walk past is fun. I only did it on the Sunday, as Saturdays Bruce was unable to attend, but if I’d known Fay Was being hassled I would have been unavailable too.

    Reply
  166. Albalha says:

    @JohnLyons
    Whatever else it sounds somewhat surreal, in a Fife park in August 2013! What happened to Saturday’s Bruce?
    Re the Lords it wouldn’t be Scotland’s to close, there will be quite a carry on with the life peers, I posted an analysis of it some time ago, here’s the link again interesting read imo.
    link to nottspolitics.org 
     

    Reply
  167. John Lyons says:

    Yes, it wasn’t a serious suggestion because quite obviously the British Government simply wouldn’t stand for it, but it illustrates the point, why should we?
     
    I don’t know what happened to Saturdays Bruce, I think he had a better offer and knew I’d cover him.

    Reply
  168. Dave says:

    A helmet cam is a cheap way to record these busybodies.

    Reply
  169. Morag says:

    The thing that bugs me about all this is that if the boot was on the other foot it would be all over the papers and RS, and we’d have Brewer on Newsnicht dementing on about the evil separatists using this vile underhand trick to silence their saintly opponents.
     
    All Susan Calman has to say is that someone told her someone had been a bit rude about her on the internet, and it’s practically a diplomatic incident.  And it wasn’t even true.  Wasn’t it all over the media when someone allegedly vandalised the BT offices or something?
     
    But now, even the computer hacking isn’t being pursued with any vigour, and nobody’s assuming that BT were involved and castigating them publicly or anything like that.  And this nasty little ploy to hamstring the Yes activists will just be ignored as if it isn’t happening.

    Reply
  170. John Lyons says:

    Not surreal to me. I was Robert the Bruce at Fort George Celebration of the Centuries and I was the older Robert Bruce at Aberdour as I cast my memories back and watch a Younger Robert capture in various battles. The surreal part for me is I’ve only been Bruce three times this year, but I think that might change next year…

    Reply
  171. lumilumi says:

    John Lyons, 9:45
    I only did it on the Sunday, as Saturdays Bruce was unable to attend, but if I’d known Fay Was being hassled I would have been unavailable too.
     
    Or you should’ve sprung to her defence like a knight in shining armour! 😀
    (My brother was into live role play before the kids came along and made a chainmail tunic for himself. It weighed a ton… well, 20 kg. You have to be fit to wear one of those and actually move around!)
     
    On the more serious matter of the No campaign apparently trying to suppress debate, information dissemination and free speech in the run up to the referendum. I think this is a really serious and sad development for democracy in the UK. The No campaign has the MSM on its side so their (mis/dis)information gets disseminated on a daily basis. They can’t mount a grassroots campaign and so want to deny one for the Yes side.
     
    I think the Yes campaigners should keep a record of these incidents where the Yes campaign have been denied stalls, leafleting, whatever.
     
    I’ve had a few chuckles over the idea floated in this tread and an earlier one about Yes campaigners volunteering to man BT stalls for BT’s non-existent grassroots volunteers to gain access to public events. 😀 See how kind, helpful and public-spirited the Yessers are!

    Reply
  172. Gordon Bain says:

    @ Albalha
     
    I am Canadian but I live in Scotland and come from Scottish blood (long story). I live in rural Angus, not too far from Kirrie. Speaking of which, a local company called Autoecosse recently opened a branch in Kirrie and just today I noticed they have 4 large Union jacks flying outside their building with no Saltires in evidence. If I can word it properly I’m going to fire off an email to them.

    Reply
  173. Albalha says:

    @gordonbain
    Thanks for the response. Flags are becoming more and more numerous. I travel a fair bit around Scotland and it’s interesting to see more and more saltires in gardens but also an increase in Union flags.
    I’m not sure there’s much you can do if businesses want to fly the Union flag, though you may elicit an interesting response. 

    Reply
  174. Albalha says:

    @johnlyons
    You’re right I’ve no experience of re-enactment I’d wager however, as you say, you’re going to be busier as RtheB next year. 
     

    Reply
  175. Jeannie says:

    @albalha
    @gordon bain
     
    I drove from Glasgow to Orkney last week and thought I saw quite a lot of saltires flying in Caithness.  You also see quite a lot in parts of Argyll.

    Reply
  176. lumilumi says:

    I holidayed in Scotland this summer and definitely saw more saltires than two years ago.

    Reply
  177. Molly says:

    If there is a police officer who reads this or anyone knows one could they not advise us re bi-laws if not I’m sure Mr House would be happy to give us advice to save wasting his officers time. As for the nonsense of the Better Together have to be present  , where is this written ? The Referendum is not Council business , so who came us with this notion that both sides have to be present ? It’s not party political its people supporting a campaign . If this ‘equality’ was true , every time Alistair Darling gave an after dinner speech , someone from Yes would have to be present or every time a press release is printed , you would need to have a Yes press release so Which is it ?

    Reply
  178. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Test case required here. Somebody refused a stall on the spurious grounds that NAW isn’t having one should set one up anyway and see what a the council/police can do about it. Full publicity should be planned 

    Reply
  179. John Lyons says:

    Yep, on the publicity side/ bleeping records, maybe a Facebook page would help make it all easily accessible…

    Reply
  180. Gordon Bain says:

    I see far more Satires these days than ever before Which is as it should be. Union flags too but not so many and always positioned for maximum effect. Alyth has a huge flagpole on the green and previously it’s always flow the council flag; not anymore. Now it’s a huge Union Jack! If you drive further into the village there’s a house covered in the damn things. I’m guessing its a local bull boy councillor that’s responsible.

    Reply
  181. starlaw says:

    be very careful about taking photo’s of policemen  , its illegal ,  disgruntled cooncilors , jobsworths or other busybodies , fine …. 

    Reply
  182. Rusty Shackleford says:

    starlaw says:
    26 August, 2013 at 7:23 pm

    be very careful about taking photo’s of policemen  , its illegal ,  disgruntled cooncilors , jobsworths or other busybodies , fine …. 

    Not entirely true I gather, some useful information here:
    link to urban75.org

    Reply
  183. Malcolm Kerr says:

    The local press are at it too. Wyvex Media (the Oban Times group) now intend to take no material from either Yes or No campaigners ‘in the interests of balance’, until after the referendum. The Arran Banner (part of the group) declined this week to publish a picture and short report on a recent Yes Campaign BBQ. See Yes Scotland Arran on Facebook. On enquiry about their approach to commercial advertising (e.g. to advertise an event or public meeting) it seems that these will have to be approved by head office. 

    Reply
  184. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    The Oban Times group is English owned and fiercely anti independence and has been for some time.
    They have the Campbeltown Courier and the Argyllsshire Advertiser as well.

    Reply
  185. CameronB says:

    @ Boorach
    I understand what you are saying and I admire the spirit. We are the grass roots and it is up to us to get things done. That should not mean volunteers going out on their own though IMO, whether or not they can ‘handle’ themselves. As I said, I have yet to contact my local Yes group, so can’t really comment on how they prepare volunteers.

    Reply
  186. Pat says:

     “Orange activists” and “Loyalist vandals” in Dunoon ! Is this Scotland or Northern Ireland ?

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,726 Posts, 1,215,029 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Seems that neither Sven nor Bob have anything sensible to say about the war in the east. No change there…Apr 3, 19:26
    • Robert Hughes on The Gender Of Mountains: “Of course Swinney would bend over to * accommodate * the utterly farcical ” Red Menace ” bollocks ; another…Apr 3, 16:25
    • Sven on The Gender Of Mountains: “Vivian O’Blivion @ 14.15. A senior source close to the First Minister has a brass neck to dare to even…Apr 3, 16:12
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – there is no such thing as a binary state, states can either be unitary (like the U.K.) or…Apr 3, 15:02
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““there’ll be Ruskie tanks parked in front of Hollyrood if we’re no careful” That, my dear Vivian O’Blivion, is an…Apr 3, 14:59
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““gutless pro Trump Brit Yoon NAZI appeaser” Iain treats us to another lesson on “hearts and minds”. Just in case…Apr 3, 14:47
    • Young Lochinvar on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Khmer Vert should just pull the trigger of the metaphorical gun they are holding to their own “electability” heads…Apr 3, 14:20
    • Vivian O’Blivion on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Scotland Editor of The New Statesman, Chris Deerin is full of praise for Mayor Swinney of Brigadoom. “The SNP…Apr 3, 14:15
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Yes – the ICCPR is an international obligation, however. For more information about the strength of the petition see Leah…Apr 3, 14:12
    • Dunx on The Gender Of Mountains: “The HRC And the ICCPR are different things.Apr 3, 12:54
    • MaryB on The Gender Of Mountains: “Thanks for that, Sarah.Apr 3, 12:16
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “As for the “principle of respect for the territorial integrity of states”, that can only apply to unitary states. For…Apr 3, 11:48
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Scotland Act 1998 clause 7 (2) Sub-paragraph (1) does NOT reserve – (a) observing and implementing international obligations, obligations under…Apr 3, 11:30
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “Ah, so it’s not an important matter of principle at all, then. It’s just a shoddy excuse to keep certain…Apr 3, 11:28
    • Mark Beggan on The Gender Of Mountains: ““A gutless pro Trump British yoon Nazi appeaser” as opposed to an aborted pro Faggot inbred Lefty jizz stain.Apr 3, 10:24
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “@Mary – you’re right, but the UNCRC was successfully challenged in the Supreme Court on the basis that it extended…Apr 3, 10:04
    • Sven on The Gender Of Mountains: “Iain More @ 08.15. I suspect that this will be in retaliation for the 82% Tariff which the Islands impose…Apr 3, 09:49
    • Southernbystander on The Gender Of Mountains: “Is there not a serious problem of throwing the baby out with the bath water with this endless invocation of…Apr 3, 09:44
    • MaryB on The Gender Of Mountains: “Aidan @ 6.23am Why don’t you Google UN Human Rights and ICCPR? The UK adopted the overall Human Rights Act,…Apr 3, 09:36
    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “Ok we get that you are a gutless pro Trump Brit Yoon NAZI appeaser. Thanks for letting is know.Apr 3, 09:22
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Why is this a gift for Scottish Indy, Iain? Is iScotland going to stand up to President Trump and the…Apr 3, 08:48
    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “41% Tariffs on Falkland Islands. What did they do to piss off Fuhrer Trump? I had no idea that the…Apr 3, 08:15
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “Another cunning plan based on a whole heap of made up legal arguments which no court, anywhere, is going to…Apr 3, 06:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Sacrifice: “@Zimba Regarding moral inconsistencies. I believe a meaningful debate between fair-minded individuals acting in good faith first needs some kind…Apr 2, 21:17
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “IMPORTANT: Leah Gunn Barrett attended the Public Petitions Committee at Holyrood today in order to see what would happen to…Apr 2, 19:40
    • agent x on The Gender Of Mountains: “Caroline Lucas says: “He helped transform the fortunes of the Scottish Green party – taking the party into government for…Apr 2, 18:13
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Have a wee look at her post and highlights of committee meeting today at Holyrood today, she’s a fighter, well…Apr 2, 18:08
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:04
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:00
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Soz, double post…Apr 2, 17:41
  • A tall tale



↑ Top