The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The days ahead

Posted on January 02, 2013 by

We were going to get 2013 up and running with a piece on how we’d like to see the independence debate approached in the coming year, but Ewan Crawford has rather kindly done the job for us in The Scotsman, in a snappy 113 words:

“Labour has decided to mount a campaign based primarily on a combination of all-out personal attack against the First Minister and an assault on what they characterise as Scotland’s “something for nothing culture” typified by free personal care for the elderly and the abolition of university tuition fees.

In 2013 they should feel free to get on with this to see if this is indeed the platform that people in Scotland have been crying out for from a potential party of government.

The overwhelming focus of the independence campaign should instead be about a sense of possibility and a conversation with people concerned about jobs and the economic prospects for themselves and their families.”

In an ideal world, the last paragraph on its own would probably have sufficed. But it’s vitally important to understand the opposition’s position not just on the superficial political level, but also what it tells us about the consequences of a No vote.

If there’s one truth the independence movement really needs to get across to the people of Scotland in the next 12 months if it’s to build towards victory, it’s that there will be no additional powers for Holyrood within the UK should Scots reject the opportunity to run their own affairs. Indeed, the opposite is likely to be the case.

Helpfully, the message compresses down neatly to just four words – words the Yes movement must, for all its positivity, drum into the minds of the Scottish people if it wants them to fully understand the choice they face in 2014: Vote No, Get Nothing.

32 to “The days ahead”

  1. Bill C says:

    I think Ewan Crawford is a gret ambassador for independence. He always comes across as very thoughtful, intelligent and reasonable. His summary of Labour’s campaign tactics are spot on and will hopefully they will be rejected by the vast majority of Scots and turned into YES votes.

    Reply
  2. Peter Mirtitsch says:

    The thing is, that while a “Yes” vote gives us all of the pros and cons, a “No”. vote gives us less than nothing. In fact we may end up with the Scottish Government having REDUCED powers in certain areas. This is quite possibly more than mere scaremongering. Consider that although the Scottish Government is democratically elected after being democratically set up, its powers are there at the behest of Westminster. They can reduce or even totally eradicate them…remember the NI parliament which was repeatedly suspended?

    Reply
  3. David McCann says:

    Completely agree Rev. The Yes campaign should commission large posters with the simple message.
    Vote No. Get 0. Zilch. Nowt.

    Reply
  4. Bill Fraser says:

    Unfortunately the outcome in the event of a no vote is a lot worse than  ‘get nothing’ . The cuts to the Barnet formula because of the austerity policy’s and the recommended changes to the formula to be based on a skewed claim of need ( which alone will result in cuts of £4.5bn or £1, 600 per person) and the likelihood that power will be stripped from our parliament  will make life a lot harder for a majority of us. The message that has to be got across is ghat a no vote will NOT maintain ths status quo. 
     

    Reply
  5. Bill C says:

    First written mistake of 2013.  My post should read “I think Ewan Crawford is a gret ambassador for independence. He always comes across as very thoughtful, intelligent and reasonable. His summary of Labour’s campaign tactics are spot on and will hopefully be rejected by the vast majority of Scots and turned into YES votes.”

    Reply
  6. Derick says:

    Bill – ‘gret’ is fine in Scots!

    Reply
  7. AndrewFraeGovan says:

    @Derick, Bill
    Bit dubious about “His summary….are” though! 

    Reply
  8. G H Graham says:

    Refreshing to see that there remains thinkers still allowed to contribute & publish their work for comic titles such as The Scotsman and The Herald.

    Regrettably, it won’t make any difference because their rare, balanced assessments are overwhelmed by the daily tsunami of sneering, peurile, illogical rants from the army of mad men & dogs who must surely be amazed that they are still allowed to craft whatever juvenile propaganda their lazy journalistic talents conjure up.

    I urge all of you to avoid reading these rags so that they end up in the archive drawers of the Mitchell Library as soon as possible. Independent Scottish journalism doesn’t exist so no point in wishing for its resurrection. We never had it in the first place.

    Reply
  9. Davy says:

    First, may I wish everyone a Happy New Year for 2013, and then second I fully agree with that last paragraph, I would like to see the YES campaign and our Scottish government look at methods of further increasing universal benefits for Scotland in the future.

    lets show how a positive  outlook is the way forward for our country and its people, lets have goals and dreams to aim for. No more should Scotland feel it has just to stand there and accept whatever Westminster hands out, lets show the unionist parties the real meaning of positive independence.

    vote no, get nothing.

    VOTE YES, FOR “NAE LIMITS”.

    VOTE YES, FOR A SCOTTISH FUTURE. 

    Hail Alba Gu snooker loopy!

             

    Reply
  10. Juteman says:

    It’s pretty obvious that the NO campaign is being run by folk who don’t ‘get’ Scotland.
     We Scots tend to push back hard when we are written off as no hope underdogs.
    Long may the NO’s continue with their current strategy. I can see a lot of folk voting YES as a ‘get it right up ye’ statement.

    Reply
  11. douglas clark says:

    Juteman,
    Ain’t that the truth.
     
     
     

    Reply
  12. Christian Wright says:

    Surely Labour must be private-polling and focus-grouping the effectiveness of this scorched earth strategy. I guess it must be working with their target demographic (or they wouldn’t continue) though I see no major shift in public polling that evinces this. 
     
     
    .

    Reply
  13. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Unfortunately the outcome in the event of a no vote is a lot worse than  ’get nothing’”

    All of that’s covered by the posts in the new tag, and indeed in the penultimate paragraph of the post itself. But it’s a much less snappy slogan.

    Reply
  14. JLT says:

    Just listened to ‘Call Kaye’ this morning, and it was a tad interesting. Her guests were a lady from Finland, a Scot who lives in Sweden (Stockholm), and a Professor from Norway. She also had Iain McWhirter from The Herald.
    When Kaye asked why Scotland should adopt the Scandinavian model, I think she was thrown by ALL of her guests, as to ‘why not’. Even Iain from The Herald said that by being a small nation with a small population, it made things easier to control when raising tax, or see what your money is being spent on.
    The Scandinavians highly praised our NHS, and wish that they had such a brilliant system.
    Kaye after an hour or so is now scrambling. No one is condemning the Scandinavian model. In fact, the Scandinavians are actually saying that with the current setup that Scotland has, by adding to it with Scandinavian values, Scotland would be seriously enhanced.
    Kaye panicking now, asks the Scandinavians that if it is so good …why did they leave there to live here in Scotland. And they pointed out that they wanted to see the world. They love Scotland, and think we’re brilliant, but they pointed out, that if Scotland did do teh Scandinavian model, then what a country we would be. Even Iain, who was slightly more guarded on this, basically endorsed it. You could hear Kaye swearing in her mind that the show has not gone according to plan. At that point, she ended the show so she could post a recording of an interview with the Scots boy from the film, The Angels Share. 

    Not a great morning for Kaye herself. For Independent minded folk … a brilliant show !!! 

    Reply
  15. mato21 says:

    Nae Limits sung by Hazel Lewry  (Weegiewarbler)

    link to youtube.com

    Reply
  16. Iain says:

    @Bill C

    Agree with you re. Ewan Crawford. The contrast between him  and the raddled and somewhat spirituous Simon Pia on Newsnicht recently was stark.  

    Reply
  17. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Vote No – Get Nowt is probably sharper.

    Juteman is right. They don’t understand Scotland. This is hugely to our advantage. We now have a ridiculous situation that the officials of Scotland’s unionist parties are probably sending self serving nonsense to their London leaders who want to believe it and they are determining their media campaign on the back of this.
    You are drowning when you start to believe your own spin. The grass roots of these parties know they are being expected to serve up this mince and are walking away. The media in fact is unwittingly complicit in the imminent implosion of Scotland’s Labour Party by helpfully distributing rubbish on Labour’s behalf.

    Has anybody else noted the huge amount of TV exposure the LibDems are getting?
    We are seeing more of Wullie Rennie than we are of Davidson and Lamont (and indeed of Salmond and Sturgeon). This probably means two things. The media have realised  that Davidson and Lamont are bust. And the LibDem vote has been the one that has done most damage to the SNP vote in the past and needs to be brought back into play to save the union.

    Reply
  18. muttley79 says:

    Yes, a No vote is unfortunately going to be worse, probably significantly, than the status quo at present.  We would almost certainly have to privatise the NHS in Scotland, no additional powers for Scotland, and ironically, a likely withdrawal from the EU.  Given that the Tories are already looking to privatise the police in England and Wales, the No parties, (given that the Tories and Labour are now so close), would no doubt look to do the same thing here.

    Reply
  19. JLT says:

    In fact, when I think about it ….I don’t think I’ve ever heard ‘Call Kaye’ shut down a topic at 10am, and then spend the last 30 minutes of her show, with a pre-recording of an interview done days earlier. It was almost as if this was ‘Plan B’ if the topic did not go well for the Unionist Station.
    As I said, she certainly was spitting the dummy out when she practically demanded of the Scandinavians ‘If it is so GOOD …why did you LEAVE Scandinavia?’.
    Like I said – hilarious, especially when the Scandinavians quietly replied that they left as they wanted to see what the rest of the world was like, and when they came here, they absolutely fell in love with Scotland and its people. They held us seriously high regard! And then they added that what a place Scotland really could be if it adopted the Scandinavian system, and added it onto the best bits of Scottish life (free tuition, brilliant NHS, etc).
    You could hear Kaye screeching in her head at what was meant to be a question to stump the Scandinavians, but ended up actually backfiring and walloping the Unionist Station right between the eyes !!!  

    Reply
  20. muttley79 says:

    @JLT

    Kaye Adams, like the rest of the No campaign, does not want the people of Scotland to think about new possibilities, vision for their country, new political parties. This is because they have nothing to offer, no vision, no ideas to improve Scotland, just the same tired old Westminster, first-past-the-post, unelected House of Lords etc system.

    Reply
  21. JLT says:

    Muttley,

    It was hilarious mate. I already knew her show was a massive fan of the ‘No’ campaign. I listen to her nonsense show each day in the van as I travel from site to site fixing PC’s. That’s why it was such a brilliant show today as she tripped over her own questions. The Scandinavians on the show hold Scotland in such a high regard, that they seem to think that we are very much like them, historically and culturally, and that we should be part of the Nordic setup. They mentioned about how they value community spirit, but what astonished them was just how much better our community spirit is. It was way better than theirs as they said that we were more open, while they felt that their own cultures were slightly more reserved. They praised our sense of equality, and how we value it. 
    Honestly, they only had high praise for us. They want us to go our own way, and join them in a trading and cultural society that is equality based. So, it was no surprise that ‘Call Kaye’ killed the show at 10am instead of 10.30 by playing a pre-recorded tape. They’ve never done that before !!!

    Reply
  22. Training Day says:

    Unionists who occasionally appear on this blog have been asked repeatedly what is their positive vision for Scotland under the Union post a No vote?  They have repeatedly – and conspicuously – failed to provide any answer.  Well, let me do their job for them.

    The plan is that the Scottish Parliament must never again be allowed to pass meaningful legislation which diverges from the Westmnister agenda or, heaven forfend, propose another referendum.  Therefore, under the guise of improving accountability and promoting democracy, the Unionist parties will amend the electoral system to Holyrood to ensure no abolute majorities are possible again, and thus stymie the Parliament.  It will gradually become – and be perceived as – a pointless talking shop, making the transition of such reduced powers as exist at that point to the dead hand of Labour municipalism via agglomerated local authorities much more presentable to the electorate.

    It isn’t much of a plan, as it presupposes that a Unionist coalition will be elected in 2016 (hence, though, the ‘amendments’ to the electoral system above).  It also does not take account of how an existing Nationalist majority which has 18 months to run in the Parliament might react in the aftermath of a No vote.  But it’s all they’ve got.   

    Finally, it is almost a year since I asked Angus Robertson MP in a public meeting whether there was an intention to spell out publicly the consequences of a No vote.  His answer was evasive, saying it was a ‘good point’ before moving swiftly on.  I trust the thinking in the Yes camp has advanced since then.

    Reply
  23. muttley79 says:

    @JLT

    I can guess what her reaction would be!  😀  I find it very annoying, if amusing in a way, that the No campaign is so vehement that we cannot afford universalist benefits, but can afford Trident, wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, bankers bailouts etc.  It is almost as if they have completely the wrong priorities… 😀

    Reply
  24. JLT says:

    Muttley,

    Exactly mate …exactly… 

    Reply
  25. JLT says:

    Training Day,

    I don’t think that scenario will truly happen. I have a feeling that even if the No vote wins, that this will not go away – not this time. I think the cat is truly out of the bag. What can Westminster do. Say the SNP win by another huge majority in 2018, I bet the first thing they will do is make noises about a new referendum  – especially if it is a Tory/UKIP coalition from 2015 onwards. Scots could be so sick of Tory rule, that they might jump at the second asking.
    This is not 1979, and this time, I can’t see what Westminster can do to stop this Nationalist feeling. Scots Law would block them again and again. If they tried to end our Parliament, then I think Scotland would go nuts. 
    I could be wrong, but I think we’ve moved on too much since the Parliament was built – there is no way we are going back to a Tory dominated 1980’s Scotland.  

    Reply
  26. Training Day says:

    @JLT

    I agree that it’s unlikely to succeed (my point about the 18 months remaining for the present Government), but nevertheless it really is the extent of Unionist planning and ‘vision’.   To get into the impoverished mindset of the Unionists you have to think like them, even be like them for a while..

    Now I’m off for a shower 😉

    Reply
  27. Craig P says:

    ‘vote no – get nothing’ could easily be misinterpreted as ‘get nothing new’, i.e. everything stays the same, when we can guess that is unlikely. The slogan should be:
     
    ‘Vote No – Barnett Goes’

    Reply
  28. Morag says:

    Vote yes, Barnett goes as well.  It’s not much of a slogan.

    Reply
  29. Craig P says:

    Still better than ‘vote no, get nothing.’ 

    What about ‘vote no – NHS goes’ ? Doesnt scan quite as well but conveys the dangers of a no vote  

    Reply
  30. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Still better than ‘vote no, get nothing.’ 

    What about ‘vote no – NHS goes’ ? Doesnt scan quite as well but conveys the dangers of a no vote”

    Feel free to choose your own slogans for your own website.

    😀

    Reply
  31. Craig P says:

    Ach I’ve got my own site – nae politics allowed though 🙁

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,787 Posts, 1,221,996 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • sam on According As We Need Them: “The Bubblyjock by Hugh MacDiarmid It’s hauf like a bird and hauf like a bogle And juist stands in the…Jul 15, 09:37
    • James Cheyne on According As We Need Them: “100%Yes. Additional info to contribute to the illegal fiction of the union, which refers to the monarch of England and…Jul 15, 09:29
    • James Cheyne on According As We Need Them: “There was many a ballad ,poem or prose written in Scots language about the condition of Scots and Scotland in…Jul 15, 08:55
    • 100%Yes on According As We Need Them: “For those interested in Scotland, the message about the union is making its mark. https://menafn.com/1109571674/Scotlands-Constitutional-Status-Revealed-As-Legal-Fiction-Experts-Confirm-Basis-For-UN-DecolonisationJul 15, 08:06
    • DaveL on According As We Need Them: “‘…on the route to liberation, I reckon mime and interpretative dance are the only way to go.’ Can you explain…Jul 15, 02:20
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “Poetry is all very well if you’re into that sort of thing. But when it comes to illustrating the oppressed…Jul 15, 00:17
    • Confused on According As We Need Them: “guy charged was an “aussie”, in a kilt; maybe done an ancestry.com and got told he was “connor macleod of…Jul 14, 23:32
    • Confused on According As We Need Them: “I was never an inmate unlike yourself. Did we meet? – if they had held onto the asylums we could…Jul 14, 23:20
    • Confused on According As We Need Them: “there was a young poster on wings cheap snarky disruption his thing agent x was his name the union his…Jul 14, 23:18
    • Alf Baird on According As We Need Them: “Development of poetry in the native tongue forms a key part of the liberation process and in understanding the colonial…Jul 14, 23:01
    • agent x on According As We Need Them: “@ James What in particular did you find Excellent?Jul 14, 22:00
    • James on According As We Need Them: “Excellent, Northcode. Keep ’em coming.Jul 14, 21:50
    • James on According As We Need Them: “Funny how the unionist rag describes the removal of the stone from a thief as ‘notorious’….Jul 14, 21:48
    • Gribble on According As We Need Them: “On the subject of intimidation on the stump, the impression as often given that this is a worsening problem. But…Jul 14, 21:39
    • Northcode on According As We Need Them: “Excellent article about a young Martinican psychiatrist’s time studying with the great Francesc Tosquelles at the Saint-Alban psychiatric asylum. Thanks…Jul 14, 21:30
    • Breastplate on According As We Need Them: “John Main, You Unionists seem to routinely register your disapproval on the reliance of 300 year old documentation, but accept…Jul 14, 20:43
    • agent x on According As We Need Them: “@ Northcode I notice there has been minimal, or maybe make that no support or encouragement for your poems on…Jul 14, 20:15
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Just Good Friends: “In case you are unaware (and for comparison): WAR O THE WARLDS By H. G. Wells – Owerset intae NOR-EAST…Jul 14, 20:11
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “Enjoying your use of iambic quadrameter, NC. And your random departures from it too. If you’re taking requests, highlights from…Jul 14, 19:49
    • Northcode on According As We Need Them: “I posted one of ma braw poems recently about the demon Nuckelavee being cawd up fae the depths o’ the…Jul 14, 19:38
    • Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: ““trying as usual to undermine anything about Scotland” You should read Rev Stu’s articles and not just jump straight to…Jul 14, 18:06
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “In this heat you need to be eating salads.Jul 14, 17:55
    • twathater on Just Good Friends: “Wow the yoonies are out in force trying as usual to undermine anything about Scotland ,they’re like wee yapping dugs…Jul 14, 17:35
    • Dan on According As We Need Them: “In a bid to disrupt mental Main’s posting stream… Related to this article, there’s a fair few quid being spaffed…Jul 14, 17:14
    • Mark Beggan on According As We Need Them: “The Gravy boat is just a woke away. Just a woke away Just a woke away Just a woke away.Jul 14, 16:55
    • Mark Beggan on According As We Need Them: “I’m getting out of here. They’re all mad!Jul 14, 16:54
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: ““can a thief be robbed?” Now I’m confused, Confused. You have stated on here many times that when it comes…Jul 14, 16:48
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: ““nothing of the colonizer’s is appropriate for the colonized” Stand out post from Professor Baird. Anybody with him on calling…Jul 14, 16:20
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “Nice try, NC, but easily discounted, as you have failed to provide any evidence for your assertion that Scotland’s high…Jul 14, 16:01
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: ““Scotland as a Lunatic Asylum” When Confused writes on a subject so aligned with his own, lived experience, it behoves…Jul 14, 15:51
  • A tall tale



↑ Top