The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


New high score

Posted on June 01, 2013 by

Littered with bank and school holidays, and often with the first glimpse of summer luring people out of doors away from their TVs, newspapers and monitor screens, May is usually a pretty slow month in politics. (Except in election years, of course.) We’re human too, and the last 30 days saw fewer posts on Wings Over Scotland than any this year – 83 compared to the Jan-Apr average of 101.

So we’re extra-chuffed about this:

mayuv

That’s a whopping 15% increase on last month’s all-time record, and over 8,300 more unique readers. (Number of visits was also up slightly, with total pageviews marginally down as you’d expect from the decreased post count.)

As ever, thanks to everyone who makes the site worthwhile by coming here to read it. We’re taking a research day today, but no more slacking after that. There’s work to do.

28 to “New high score”

  1. Holebender says:

    I’m certainly unique! 😉

    Reply
  2. Hillbillhoilday says:

    Congratulations! Far better than my feeble efforts..
    link to stats.grok.se
    link to en.wikipedia.org

    Reply
  3. Rod Mac says:

    Referring back to Eric Joyce’s piece yesterday let us hope a lot of these 63111 are Don’t Knows .
    Congratulations it goes to show when the material is truth and reality the people respond.
    As print papers shed readers like snow off a dyke this is brilliant news.

    Reply
  4. Silverytay says:

    Well done Rev , its sites and stats like this that will ensure we get the yes vote that we all desire .
    This is now my first and last site that I visit everyday .
    As the saying goes onwards and upwards .

    Reply
  5. Weedeochandorris says:

    Excellent.  Onwards and upwards!

    Reply
  6. Quick the suns oot says:

    I started reading this site after that massive wtf moment when the swastika saltire was published. I waited in vain the day after the photo was printed for the expected condemnation from the rest of the media (we had texted bbc news, call Kaye, Sky news, etc). I was ignorant of the ‘situation’ back then heheh but it was the deafening silence from the mainstream media that made me look for others who felt the same as me. That was at the same time as the dodgy donor and legal letters, N/C going offline etc. What an introduction! Attacking freedom of speech, redefinition of the words fascist and racist, and an introduction of newer hate terms like separatist and cybernat. I had had no idea of what had been going on.

    So, I’ve been a regular visitor here since April although this is the first time I’ve commented. I think many more people will have their own wtf moment and then they too will also need to find something to help explain what the mainstream does not. We are fortunate this time around that we have the internet, if this was 1979…

    I am really cheered to hear there have been many more like me. People who were waiting but are now fully engaged! Its a wee bit ironic dont you think that it was the extreme position of the mainstream media that sent me here!

    Reply
  7. Graham Ennis says:

    more than twice the readership of the Hootsmon then……closing on the Herlad, gosh, sounds like a success!,
     

    Reply
  8. themadmurph says:

    2 of those would be me checking back while on holiday in internet shops, so it would only be a measly 63109.  That sort of inflation of the numbers will be jumped on by better together! 🙂

    Reply
  9. David McCann says:

    I never miss it- well hardly ever! Keep them coming. I regularly copy them to the BBC. Im sure somebody must read them.

    Reply
  10. Well done, Stuart. No wonder the DTP hate Cybernats! ;o)

    Reply
  11. The Man in the Jar says:

    “Wings” is definitely the best source of “Cyberammo” going!

    Reply
  12. Dee says:

    Congrats Rev, really enjoy the site and the mixed views that it attracts. 
    O/T   DTP ????  +.  Unique Visitor ?????  

    Reply
  13. Caroline Corfield says:

    Well done and goan yersel! I don’t know what I’d do without this site, the information, the discussion and the banter are the best.

    Reply
  14. Red Squirrel says:

    Congratulations and it’s well-deserved – in the absence of decent MSM reporting, I rely online forums like Wings.
    Thanks for all the articles and comments – it gives me a whole new perspective on why Yes is the only way to go.

    Reply
  15. Marker Post says:

    Many congratulations, brilliant site, a haven for us cybernats!

    Reply
  16. Breastplate says:

    Just to echo others, I look forward to the posts and comments each day. I’m amazed how prolific you are, so don’t burn yourself out or we’ll all not know what to do with ourselves.

    Reply
  17. Dcanmore says:

    Yup, brilliant site, writing and great banter. I’m sure you’ll have an Mi5 file by now! 😉
     

    Reply
  18. The Flamster says:

    Me too – I’m always reading on here and I tell everyone else I know to come on and read the truth.  You also learn so much reading everyone’s comments 🙂

    Reply
  19. Gorbals Caley says:

    Well done Rev, excellent site – onwards to 2014!

    Reply
  20. Gizzit says:

    A quality site with high calibre contributors – while I might not agree with absolutely everything posted, I am more convinced every day that Independence represents the only sane choice for the people of Scotland.
     
    Every vile, shabby, underhand trick from Westminster and the mainstream media only serves to strengthen my resolve.
     

    Reply
  21. Patrick Roden says:

    Well done Rev, won’t be long until you hit that 100,000 unique visitors mark !

    Reply
  22. widen says:

    link to telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  23. Shinty says:

    Yup, mostly what everyone has said already.
    I have to confess to being a Wings Junkie.

    Reply
  24. john king says:

    my morning begins around 5am 
    kettle on, porridge on, computer on, and check whats been said in wings over when I’ve been in bed, and never disappointed, loads to catch up on and lots of  interesting comments on great content provided by rev stu,
    its like the old days when I went to the front door and pulled the morning paper out of the letter box,
    only difference is WE make the news and noone tells us what to think
     
    RESPECT, STU:)

    Reply
  25. Seasick Dave says:

    Quick the suns oot
     
    Good to hear from you!
     
    My WTF moment came back in 1999 when Labour ran the ‘Divorce is an Expensive Option’ campaign and the BBC played it at every opportunity, complete with the sound of creaking branches snapping off trees!
     
    link to news.bbc.co.uk
     
    I went from being not interested in politics to joining the SNP and eventually becoming a swivel eyed nutter!

    Reply
  26. Dorothy Devine says:

    Excellent! Well done!
    Now that I’ve found you I won’t let go!

    Reply
  27. themadmurph says:

    folks I need some help.  I was talking to a work colleague who is currently a NO voter.  I asked him why, he said because of his Dad’s pension from Babcocks!  He believes, and I assume his Dad does too, that after independence he would lose it all.  Are there any good links which would explain it in basic terms, to put his mind to rest?
    We could add another two to the YES vote!

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “folks I need some help. I was talking to a work colleague who is currently a NO voter. I asked him why, he said because of his Dad’s pension from Babcocks! He believes, and I assume his Dad does too, that after independence he would lose it all. Are there any good links which would explain it in basic terms, to put his mind to rest?”

      Babcock is a private-sector company listed on the London Stock Exchange:

      link to en.wikipedia.org

      It operates completely independently of governments. A Yes or No vote in the referendum would have no effect on its pension scheme whatsoever. He’s no more likely to lose his pension if Scotland becomes independent than he is if Labour (or come to that, the Monster Raving Loony Party) win the next election.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,849 Posts, 1,232,080 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Northcode on Spoiler Alert: “Where the fuck are all the dim-witted colonialists hiding today? Come out, come out wherever you are… Northcode wants to…Dec 11, 12:02
    • Northcode on Spoiler Alert: “I don’t believe there is any such thing as a ‘Scottish judge’ anymore, AlfDec 11, 11:29
    • Northcode on Spoiler Alert: “Are you gay? I can’t post a single fucking comment on here without you sniffin’ aboot ma erse trying to…Dec 11, 11:25
    • Geoff Anderson on Spoiler Alert: “Interesting “tell”. https://x.com/OldRoberts953/status/1998785687085265288?s=20Dec 11, 11:19
    • Alf Baird on Spoiler Alert: ““A jury of ordinary Scots found him not guilty but the BBC and many journos of the press found ways…Dec 11, 11:13
    • Hatey McHateface on Spoiler Alert: “Then again, Alf, some societies are simply run by thickos. Some of these societies are democratically run by thickos, regularly…Dec 11, 11:06
    • Hatey McHateface on Spoiler Alert: “Yet again, Northy, a wonderful opportunity for you to take the lead! Incidentally, and yet more evidence of your inability…Dec 11, 10:54
    • Bilbo on Spoiler Alert: “Lorncal Why are we so upset with government interference in the judiciary yet have no problem whatsoever with interference by…Dec 11, 10:28
    • Achnababan on Spoiler Alert: “The coordination and spinning of this risible judgement reminds me very much of the Salmond trial. A jury of ordinary…Dec 11, 09:59
    • Achnababan on Spoiler Alert: “This is standard treatment by the BBC. Geissler, had wanted to inform, would have consulted a legal expert. But his…Dec 11, 09:53
    • Dan on Spoiler Alert: “@ Doug Well I suppose such a project would create yet another handy trickle up revenue stream from the less…Dec 11, 09:38
    • Sven on Spoiler Alert: “willie @ 01.08. Again, like our esteemed host, you speak plain, common sense Willie, however I doubt that any of…Dec 11, 09:23
    • Northcode on Spoiler Alert: ““Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!” Ozymandias knew it. And, of course, Rameses II knew it, too. Perhaps…Dec 11, 07:38
    • Cynicus on Spoiler Alert: ““Credit should be apportioned to Stuart Campbell, proprietor of the Wings Over Scotland website, for identifying that several of the…Dec 11, 03:33
    • Jill on The Valley Of The Dolls: “I hope that Sandy Peggie has the reserves of strength needed to carry on. What she’s been put through already…Dec 11, 03:16
    • willie on Spoiler Alert: “What amount of wrong doing does one need to do to have sanction levied on the wrong doer. Biological man…Dec 11, 01:08
    • Doug on Spoiler Alert: “it looks like mass litigation is going to be the only thing that breaks the stonewall ideology grip on our…Dec 11, 00:11
    • Marie on Spoiler Alert: ““Lowly employment judges”. Lowly indeed. Lowly and cowardly.Dec 10, 23:23
    • joolz on Spoiler Alert: ““The tribunal’s logic would justify installing smoke alarms only after the fire has started.” Spot on! I’ve been telling TRAs…Dec 10, 22:38
    • holymacmoses on Spoiler Alert: ““One of the most troubling passages asserts there is insufficient evidence that a male person poses greater risk than a…Dec 10, 22:18
    • 100%Yes on Spoiler Alert: “Geoff Anderson, I apologize I got you confused with someone else.Dec 10, 21:04
    • 100%Yes on Spoiler Alert: “Its funny you’ve got a voice today, well done. Because on the constitutional question the SNP has you pissing your…Dec 10, 20:48
    • Jay on Spoiler Alert: “Frearghas, thank you for making me think further than before. Returning to practical circumstances, if there were a channel of…Dec 10, 20:12
    • Geoff Anderson on Spoiler Alert: “Times Sandie Peggie case Stu given credit Archived https://archive.is/SK4CvDec 10, 19:56
    • Craig on Spoiler Alert: “https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c75v1d6npr1o Not in the habit of posting a BBC website link but Baroness Falkner is saying exactly what Rev said…Dec 10, 19:42
    • Aidan on Spoiler Alert: “Quite 100% Yes, it might be different if Liberate were a genuine challenger to the SNP, but 6 months out…Dec 10, 19:14
    • Lorncal on Spoiler Alert: “I really think it goes way beyond that now, Marie. Some are openly hostile to women’s rights and biased towards…Dec 10, 18:45
    • agentx on Spoiler Alert: “On BBC Reporting Scotland tonight – Robin Moira White (“I was the first barrister to transition from male to female…Dec 10, 18:44
    • Lorncal on Spoiler Alert: “Lord Hodge, soon to retire, is a Scottish judge in the Supreme Court, James, and the For Women Scotland case…Dec 10, 18:42
    • 100%Yes on Spoiler Alert: “So explain to us all how voting for liberate Scotland and the SNP remaining in power benefit Scotland and how…Dec 10, 18:29
  • A tall tale



↑ Top