The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


New high score

Posted on June 01, 2013 by

Littered with bank and school holidays, and often with the first glimpse of summer luring people out of doors away from their TVs, newspapers and monitor screens, May is usually a pretty slow month in politics. (Except in election years, of course.) We’re human too, and the last 30 days saw fewer posts on Wings Over Scotland than any this year – 83 compared to the Jan-Apr average of 101.

So we’re extra-chuffed about this:

mayuv

That’s a whopping 15% increase on last month’s all-time record, and over 8,300 more unique readers. (Number of visits was also up slightly, with total pageviews marginally down as you’d expect from the decreased post count.)

As ever, thanks to everyone who makes the site worthwhile by coming here to read it. We’re taking a research day today, but no more slacking after that. There’s work to do.

28 to “New high score”

  1. Holebender says:

    I’m certainly unique! 😉

    Reply
  2. Hillbillhoilday says:

    Congratulations! Far better than my feeble efforts..
    link to stats.grok.se
    link to en.wikipedia.org

    Reply
  3. Rod Mac says:

    Referring back to Eric Joyce’s piece yesterday let us hope a lot of these 63111 are Don’t Knows .
    Congratulations it goes to show when the material is truth and reality the people respond.
    As print papers shed readers like snow off a dyke this is brilliant news.

    Reply
  4. Silverytay says:

    Well done Rev , its sites and stats like this that will ensure we get the yes vote that we all desire .
    This is now my first and last site that I visit everyday .
    As the saying goes onwards and upwards .

    Reply
  5. Weedeochandorris says:

    Excellent.  Onwards and upwards!

    Reply
  6. Quick the suns oot says:

    I started reading this site after that massive wtf moment when the swastika saltire was published. I waited in vain the day after the photo was printed for the expected condemnation from the rest of the media (we had texted bbc news, call Kaye, Sky news, etc). I was ignorant of the ‘situation’ back then heheh but it was the deafening silence from the mainstream media that made me look for others who felt the same as me. That was at the same time as the dodgy donor and legal letters, N/C going offline etc. What an introduction! Attacking freedom of speech, redefinition of the words fascist and racist, and an introduction of newer hate terms like separatist and cybernat. I had had no idea of what had been going on.

    So, I’ve been a regular visitor here since April although this is the first time I’ve commented. I think many more people will have their own wtf moment and then they too will also need to find something to help explain what the mainstream does not. We are fortunate this time around that we have the internet, if this was 1979…

    I am really cheered to hear there have been many more like me. People who were waiting but are now fully engaged! Its a wee bit ironic dont you think that it was the extreme position of the mainstream media that sent me here!

    Reply
  7. Graham Ennis says:

    more than twice the readership of the Hootsmon then……closing on the Herlad, gosh, sounds like a success!,
     

    Reply
  8. themadmurph says:

    2 of those would be me checking back while on holiday in internet shops, so it would only be a measly 63109.  That sort of inflation of the numbers will be jumped on by better together! 🙂

    Reply
  9. David McCann says:

    I never miss it- well hardly ever! Keep them coming. I regularly copy them to the BBC. Im sure somebody must read them.

    Reply
  10. Well done, Stuart. No wonder the DTP hate Cybernats! ;o)

    Reply
  11. The Man in the Jar says:

    “Wings” is definitely the best source of “Cyberammo” going!

    Reply
  12. Dee says:

    Congrats Rev, really enjoy the site and the mixed views that it attracts. 
    O/T   DTP ????  +.  Unique Visitor ?????  

    Reply
  13. Caroline Corfield says:

    Well done and goan yersel! I don’t know what I’d do without this site, the information, the discussion and the banter are the best.

    Reply
  14. Red Squirrel says:

    Congratulations and it’s well-deserved – in the absence of decent MSM reporting, I rely online forums like Wings.
    Thanks for all the articles and comments – it gives me a whole new perspective on why Yes is the only way to go.

    Reply
  15. Marker Post says:

    Many congratulations, brilliant site, a haven for us cybernats!

    Reply
  16. Breastplate says:

    Just to echo others, I look forward to the posts and comments each day. I’m amazed how prolific you are, so don’t burn yourself out or we’ll all not know what to do with ourselves.

    Reply
  17. Dcanmore says:

    Yup, brilliant site, writing and great banter. I’m sure you’ll have an Mi5 file by now! 😉
     

    Reply
  18. The Flamster says:

    Me too – I’m always reading on here and I tell everyone else I know to come on and read the truth.  You also learn so much reading everyone’s comments 🙂

    Reply
  19. Gorbals Caley says:

    Well done Rev, excellent site – onwards to 2014!

    Reply
  20. Gizzit says:

    A quality site with high calibre contributors – while I might not agree with absolutely everything posted, I am more convinced every day that Independence represents the only sane choice for the people of Scotland.
     
    Every vile, shabby, underhand trick from Westminster and the mainstream media only serves to strengthen my resolve.
     

    Reply
  21. Patrick Roden says:

    Well done Rev, won’t be long until you hit that 100,000 unique visitors mark !

    Reply
  22. widen says:

    link to telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  23. Shinty says:

    Yup, mostly what everyone has said already.
    I have to confess to being a Wings Junkie.

    Reply
  24. john king says:

    my morning begins around 5am 
    kettle on, porridge on, computer on, and check whats been said in wings over when I’ve been in bed, and never disappointed, loads to catch up on and lots of  interesting comments on great content provided by rev stu,
    its like the old days when I went to the front door and pulled the morning paper out of the letter box,
    only difference is WE make the news and noone tells us what to think
     
    RESPECT, STU:)

    Reply
  25. Seasick Dave says:

    Quick the suns oot
     
    Good to hear from you!
     
    My WTF moment came back in 1999 when Labour ran the ‘Divorce is an Expensive Option’ campaign and the BBC played it at every opportunity, complete with the sound of creaking branches snapping off trees!
     
    link to news.bbc.co.uk
     
    I went from being not interested in politics to joining the SNP and eventually becoming a swivel eyed nutter!

    Reply
  26. Dorothy Devine says:

    Excellent! Well done!
    Now that I’ve found you I won’t let go!

    Reply
  27. themadmurph says:

    folks I need some help.  I was talking to a work colleague who is currently a NO voter.  I asked him why, he said because of his Dad’s pension from Babcocks!  He believes, and I assume his Dad does too, that after independence he would lose it all.  Are there any good links which would explain it in basic terms, to put his mind to rest?
    We could add another two to the YES vote!

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “folks I need some help. I was talking to a work colleague who is currently a NO voter. I asked him why, he said because of his Dad’s pension from Babcocks! He believes, and I assume his Dad does too, that after independence he would lose it all. Are there any good links which would explain it in basic terms, to put his mind to rest?”

      Babcock is a private-sector company listed on the London Stock Exchange:

      link to en.wikipedia.org

      It operates completely independently of governments. A Yes or No vote in the referendum would have no effect on its pension scheme whatsoever. He’s no more likely to lose his pension if Scotland becomes independent than he is if Labour (or come to that, the Monster Raving Loony Party) win the next election.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,988 Posts, 1,252,585 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • am firinn on The fight about to come: “Sarah is right again. Anyone who thinks that independence must wait for a perfect Scottish Government to be achieved does…” Oct 14, 17:20
    • BLMac on The fight about to come: “Looks like the SNP have dug out the Independence Carrot from under all those Stonewall Gender Manuals. Now they’re looking…” Oct 14, 16:52
    • Aidan on The fight about to come: “Oh yeah if Scotland achieved independence at the helm they’d definitely all just resign en-mass wouldn’t they, rather than say…” Oct 14, 16:38
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “It’s so obvious, isn’t it? Why don’t the members all see it? Perhaps they do but they see no alternative…” Oct 14, 16:25
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “@ Rob, these morons will probably stay in charge until we leave the Union. They will have no hold on…” Oct 14, 16:17
    • Lollysmum on The fight about to come: “Of course Indyref2 is looming or ahead according to Keith Brown & that’s where it will always remain “ahead” as…” Oct 14, 16:11
    • Dubh on The fight about to come: “Utterly frustrating and damning in equal measure. *sigh” Oct 14, 16:04
    • Rob on The fight about to come: “It will be a cold day in hell before I would vote yes a second time while these morons are…” Oct 14, 16:01
    • Ronnie on The fight about to come: “Aye,right.” Oct 14, 15:57
    • Rogueslr on The fight about to come: “It’s like the series Seven Up, with him getting older, greyer and fatter with each passing year.” Oct 14, 15:47
    • Aidan on The fight about to come: “Shall we ‘save the date’?” Oct 14, 15:43
    • Nicky T Naquetti on The fight about to come: “Voting for “independence” (which would lead to us being being ruled by the globalist EU and IMF, the way things…” Oct 14, 15:43
    • barelybare on The fight about to come: “Will the SNP be fundraising for an indyref fund,? Surely they will need funds for it. If not, what was…” Oct 14, 15:38
    • Garrion on The fight about to come: “Boots and stamping and faces come to mind…” Oct 14, 15:36
    • Geoff Huijer on The fight about to come: “Nowadays, there’s more chance of me believing it if Gordon Brown said it.” Oct 14, 15:29
    • Stuart MacKay on Still Time To Save Her: “Teenagers can make their own health decisions at 16. Parents remain legally responsible for providing guidance until they are 18.…” Oct 14, 14:46
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “According to The Guardian, oil refineries have morphed from liabilities into gold mines, due to the shortages and hence high…” Oct 14, 14:42
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Exactly as predicted by Fanon. Ordinary, apolitical Scots, struggling with the cost of living, and fretting about The War and…” Oct 14, 14:32
    • Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “When you say “colonial law” what you mean is the law, the actual law, not the made up law which…” Oct 14, 14:08
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Still Time To Save Her: “RADICAL ‘CONVERSION PRACTICES’ MOTION SET FOR SNP CONFERENCE VOTE SNP party members are set to vote on a pro-LGBT motion…” Oct 14, 13:58
    • TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “And that is not just a western historic phenomenon, what happened thousands of years ago continues to influence the present,…” Oct 14, 11:43
    • Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “No “struck” nerves here, lad (FYI the correct expression is “touched (a raw) nerve”) You carry on making yourself look…” Oct 14, 11:17
    • Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: “Yes Turabdin, for the more privileged colonized native their oppression remains somewhat obscured via assimilation into the colonizer’s culture, an…” Oct 14, 11:08
    • TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “@alf baird TRULY, it’s an affair of dont mention the Union, the giant union jack draped dinosaur occupying the comfy…” Oct 14, 10:45
    • Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: ““the Supreme Court is a superior court” Perhaps in regard to colonial law, but according to international law it is…” Oct 14, 10:38
    • TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “southernbystander & captain caveman verily i may have struck your raw nerves on the matter…..invasion & conquest, the conquerors still…” Oct 14, 10:37
    • Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: “‘Cultural obliteration’ (Fanon) is a fundamental aspect of colonial rule, so why is Bella or anyone else all of a…” Oct 14, 10:34
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Autocorrect substituted “wanging” with “wanting”. Could have been worse.” Oct 14, 09:43
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “It’s environmentally friendly, MH. Any temporary blip in carbon emissions is compensated for thousands of times over by the removal…” Oct 14, 09:29
    • Minceheid on Still Time To Save Her: “I’m trying to work out whether burning someone at the stake would be carbon-neutral or not. These things matter, you…” Oct 14, 09:06
  • A tall tale



↑ Top