The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


More empty threats at your expense

Posted on August 02, 2014 by

The UK government is about to put another taxpayer-funded leaflet through every door in Scotland, laden with dire warnings about the consequences of independence.

Boiled down to just five bullet points – one of which is the meaningless “best of both worlds” – it presents the case for the UK as amounting to keeping the pound (which Scotland can do either way), higher public spending (omitting the fact that Scots pay over the odds for said spending), jobs with UK companies (which would be unaffected because EU law demands freedom of employment) and lower energy bills.

onshorewind

The latter is based on the oft-repeated claim that fuel bills would rise in Scotland because the rUK would no longer pay to import subsidised Scottish renewable energy. But an article in The Ecologist this week, by two respected academics from Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, blows that argument out of the water.

We recommend reading all of it, but we’ve pulled out a key passage.

UK’s threats to Scotland defy logic

The UK government has long threatened that in the event of a ‘yes’ vote for Scotland’s independence, it would source its electricity from France, the Netherlands and Ireland instead of Scotland, to the extent it was cheaper.

Not only is it already relying on these European interconnectors for about 5% of its power, the argument goes that it will get more in future through plans to build new links over the next few years.

In reality, expanding this network further is fraught with difficulties. These include cost, planning, technical challenges and complex legal agreements. As Ofgem said last year,

Great Britain is not the only European country expecting de-rated margins to fall in the next six winters. France, Ireland, Germany and Belgium are also facing security of supply challenges.

So security of supply constraints are also becoming very prevalent in the markets that supply power via interconnectors. This will reduce what they can sell over the English Channel.

Buy Scottish power, or the lights will go out

In all likelihood, a rump UK would have no choice but to buy Scotland’s electricity generating surplus of around 25%. The UK government is significantly underplaying the important role that Scotland’s electricity plays in keeping the lights on across the UK.

And while the English may baulk at effectively subsidising Scotland’s green power sector, there is the consolation that purchasing this spare power will actually make very good commercial sense for Westminster.

Compared to both English offshore wind and new nuclear build, Scottish onshore wind is much cheaper. Carrying out the threat in the energy paper would be as clear a case of cutting off your nose to spite your face as one can imagine.”

The UK government is still having some trouble balancing its approach to the referendum between “lovebombing” and demanding compliance with menaces. “Your bills will go up, you’ll lose your jobs and public spending will be slashed” is a funny sort of positive case, no matter how many smiling families prancing through the Highlands you put pictures of on it.

But those who know what they’re talking about, and have no dog in the independence fight, are almost unanimous in their assessments. Whether it’s energy bills or currency or EU membership or oil revenues or just about anything else, they all tell a remarkably consistent story – Westminster is bluffing.

The parties of the Union very much don’t want to lose Scotland, for all sorts of reasons – economic, military and political. But the one thing they can afford even less than losing Scotland is to have a hostile relationship with an independent one.

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 02 08 14 13:41

    More empty threats at your expense | Scottish Independence News

158 to “More empty threats at your expense”

  1. Croompenstein says:

    When are they sending this pile of crap? I thought we were in the monitored part of the referendum, how much is this costing us? Democracy Uk style tick tock Brittania tick tock

    Reply
  2. Grouse Beater says:

    In getting bluff and bluster challenged the British government and its conglomerate funders betray why they want to keep Scotland controlled and docile.

    Reply
  3. AnneDon says:

    The other part of this, of course, is that energy companies are private, and the Westminster government can no more order them to source their energy from elsewhere than it can order them to reduce prices for the benefit of consumers.

    Reply
  4. Barry Blust says:

    When they become just another customer in the queue, will we give them a wee savings for old times? Maybe… but if they keep up with all this pish, they my find Putin more friendly.

    Reply
  5. Will the Scottish Government be sending out any leaflets to balance this barrage of “facts”?

    Reply
  6. They’re all making an arse of wind energy link to savestraitonforscotland.com

    Reply
  7. Liquid Lenny says:

    I never received the first one, who do I complain too?

    Reply
  8. Short changed says:

    It’s pathetic, on energy especially. The big six wont invest in new generating capacity and UK Ltd is too skint to build its own power stations so they go to China for funds and strike a deal that will see consumers paying well over the odds for their power.

    Reply
  9. McV says:

    Stand by for the pedantic accusations that you are misleading readers by using the word “keep” in relation to the pound.
    When they say “keep” they mean “own”. When we say we can keep the pound we are accused of not knowing the difference between a currency union and sterlingization. (did I use the right word?)
    Westminster is the one doing the misleading as always. They’re careful not to say “Scotland cannot use the pound” on tv and in newspapers, but their letters to households saying independence means walking away from the pound is a flat out lie.

    Reply
  10. handclapping says:

    Not as good as a Cairnstoon but it’ll do. 🙂

    As all they have offered us as reason for staying, they should remember that the reason for the takeover in the first place was the worry about having a possibly hostile neighbour to the North.

    Reply
  11. Ghengis D'Midgies says:

    The funny thing is the Westminster government is behaving like a hostile foreign government anyway. Lying about our wealth, pushing the subsidy myth which damages our health and confidence and even secretly moving sea boundaries to remove major oil fields from Scotland’s accounts to reduce our GDP. That’s on top of the many threats and is probably only the tip of the iceberg.

    North sea boundary move:
    link to craigmurray.org.uk

    Propaganda against Scotland plus deficit:
    link to craigmurray.org.uk

    Reply
  12. Tattie-bogle says:

    yay new YES coasters. scissors at the ready

    Reply
  13. YESGUY says:

    More of the usual guff.

    It seems to me that the “scare “tactics are all that the unionists have left. Why cant they come out with positives for the union rather than playing on folks fears ?

    To look back over the year and see the abuse and fear hammered out to fellow Scots has sickened me. Our Govt have bullied and smeared us, used state propaganda and MSM to lie and twist every fact.

    Why would anyone want a govt that does that to it’s own?

    Desperation. They have no argument. They have lost the trust of people. They only have bitter threats and they don’t scare us anymore.

    In the run up we will see much more of this and i believe we will hear many more voices crying YES. No one bullies us Scots and gets away with it.

    For one day we will have the power to change everything. And all we have to do is mark a big X in the YES box and the scares and smears will stop forever.

    Keep faith . We are winning

    Reply
  14. handclapping says:

    As history is all … Doh!

    Reply
  15. StuY says:

    This always appeared to be wrongthink to me. How can Westminster claim that power from iScotland would be more expensive than the power that will be generated from the new Chinese/French nuclear plant that has a stike price that will make it the most expensive in the world.

    Also will the EU not have something to say about the shortage of renewables in the rUK energy mix? Are there not fines for that sort of thing?

    Reply
  16. Maria says:

    Thanks to your website for all the up to date information. I read wings about 5 times a day but I’ve never posted a comment before (so not sure if I’m doing this right), but I just wanted to say thank you for another great article that proves, what a load of rubbish we are constantly being fed by Westminster. I tell everyone to read this site, I love it

    Reply
  17. Croompenstein says:

    @David Whannel – some of the BTL links on your article inevitably lay the blame at Alex Salmond and the SNP’s door but in the decision letter a couple of lines immediately jump out..

    The application was lodged on 27 April 2005

    SEPA responded 7 June 2005 and did not object to the application.

    I don’t think Alex or the SNP were in Government in 2005

    Reply
  18. Peter Mirtitsch says:

    Hey..that is the windfarm just up the road from me near Ardrossan. Lovely pic…

    Reply
  19. Tattie-bogle says:

    I love the Von Jocks strolling in the country or holidaying in the country as we have no obvious infrastructure.
    High on a hill with a lonely voter yeedalllayyyy eh ayyyy

    Reply
  20. joe kane says:

    The amount of windfarms and wind turbines that can been seen from various viewpoints in and around Wishaw and Motherwell is something else.

    I think I’ve actually ran out of sarcastic things to say about the Better Together campaign. They refuse point-blank to be embarrassed or ashamed about their serial bare-faced unrelenting naked lies and distortions. They’ve astroturfed me to a standstill.

    Reply
  21. Desimond says:

    Have you sneaked a peak at Flippers speech for this weeks debate as this covers all the bases bar beloved brave Armed Forces and TeamGB in Rio

    Reply
  22. jon esquierdo says:

    Laura Vivanco Will the Scottish government be sending out any leaflets to counter the barrage of facts

    Yes I spoke to Nicola Sturgeon two weeks ago about the government sending them out and she said that the Scottish government were also going to send them out

    Reply
  23. Ken500 says:

    It’s nonsense. Scotland pay more than the rest of the UK for fuel and energy which Scotland produces. Scotland pays 10% more (higher cost pro rata) because it is colder for the energy produced on it’s doorstep. It also pays more (inclusive cost) to transport the energy it produces south. Scotland also loses the corporation tax for the energy it produces with is paid by international UK based Companies through the City of London. Scotland also loses out on (£Billion?) renewable Grants from the EU which Westminster blocks, while Scotland subsidies higher cost for nuclear in the South.

    An Independent Scotland would be able to tax or sell the future energy it produces. £Quids in.

    Reply
  24. I did say they were all making an arse of it, strange of SNP’s Fergus Ewing shadily overruling a council decision days after East Ayrshire refused 50 in the same area due to the Dark Sky Observatory tourism which these will also affect, and south Ayrshire had just refused a further 9. Perhaps we’ll still be in Europe and can hope something will still stand.

    Reply
  25. heedtracker says:

    Its interesting watching much almost same BettertogetherBBC propaganda at work in regions like Wales and Scotland. They think they have the power to make people vote how they want but news still varies

    link to bbc.co.uk

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  26. Yesitis says:

    Oh I keep all this stuff.

    In a few years I`ll look back on it with friends and say “Remember this?”

    I mean…really, they said that?

    Reply
  27. Croompenstein says:

    @David – I was only pointing out that the myth of wind farms being all about Alex Salmond is rubbish. I don’t know too much about Dersalloch or how visible it will be from the village but I can only assume that after almost ten years all the pros and cons have been weighed up although as I say I don’t know all the facts.

    Reply
  28. Cindie says:

    Yet another reason to vote yes. No more ‘better together’ leaflets paid for by us.

    Reply
  29. Thanks, Jon!

    Reply
  30. Col The Viking says:

    Same old, same old!

    Main challenge is to work hard, talk to people and get the message across, the logic will drop, maybe not immediately but pretty soon.

    It is still too close to call but defo winnable!

    May the force be with us!

    Reply
  31. HeehawBaws says:

    I don’t think that family are so sure about all this. They look a bit uneasy to me. Their smiles are slightly forced.

    Reply
  32. Had a right laugh earlier reading about Eck’s ‘happiness guru’ Claire Howell:

    “Howell stresses the need to use positive, optimistic language in political campaigning, and has banned the SNP from using the word “freedom”. She has urged Salmond and SNP MSPs to use words such as “exciting”, “historic” and “transformational”, and coached SNP candidates by fining them for using negative language during training sessions”

    Pahahahahaaaa! There’s more:

    “… Her firm REDco, the Really Effective Development Company, has a 10 point strategy which lists “the magic of change” and “open your mind” … If we know what we want, then we can use the power of our imagination to create detailed mental images of our new reality.”

    Just incredible stuff. I can see it now, Salmond dressed up like a Hare Krishna, using the “power of imagination” to make a currency union, EU membership, etc. a reality.

    Con men.

    Reply
  33. Defo says:

    “When routine bites hard,
    And ambitions are low,
    And resentment rides high,
    But emotions won’t grow,
    And we’re changing our ways,
    Taking different roads.”

    Love will tear us apart, but we will still be friends. Right ?

    Reply
  34. galamcennalath says:

    Why do they keep pushing the same guff, including electricity ‘subsidy’? Two possibilities, they believe it works, maybe even have polling evidence it works. Or, since the Union is indefencible, that approach is all they have.

    If there was some truth to it all, then it would be a fair tactic. It’s lies and deceit and designed as such!

    I know, I know, YES must try to remain positive, but it is about time a counter directly challenging every Unionist assertation drops through every door. Several times, if necessary!

    Reply
  35. Jimbo says:

    They won’t buy Scottish renewables but they are willing to pay £ billions to build a massive wind farm on Eire’s Great Bog of Allen to supply renewables to England?

    Aye, right.

    link to theguardian.com

    Reply
  36. BigRik says:

    Just the usual lies… higher energy bills? Unlike the insanely cheap bills we have been paying since Thatcher sold off OUR assets? The power companies don’t want green energy , you can’t blame massive price hikes on the wholesale cost of wind rising.

    Reply
  37. Cuilean says:

    The last leaflet I received from BT, I simply marked on it, “Return to Sender” and put in the nearest post box. Every YES voter should do that. I’m sure the [privatised against its will Scotland] Royal Mail would be happy to oblige.

    Reply
  38. caz-m says:

    The Telegraph reporting that the Scottish Government has a couple of surprise announcements to come out next week.

    What could they be?

    link to telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  39. Croompenstein says:

    @Charlie – Touching cloth Charlie? Your old boy Flipper is gonnae need more than a guru to help him, maybe flowers of the union could step in and sing him a wee song 🙂

    Reply
  40. caz-m says:

    Newsnet Scotland:

    “Radical Independence stepping up efforts in Labour ‘heartlands’ with Mass Canvass”

    link to newsnetscotland.com

    Reply
  41. panda paws says:

    “Best of both worlds” was a Star Trek TNG two parter where we were introduced to the Borg.

    The Borg greeted everyone with “Resistence is futile, you will be assimilated”.

    Just saying.

    Reply
  42. Dick Winchester says:

    And on defence… link to independent.co.uk

    Reply
  43. martincoull says:

    Sorry – O/T but what IS going on in Shetland? Massive unreported Oil find? Clandestine visits from Cameron & Oil exec cronies… link to facebook.com

    Reply
  44. Paula Rose says:

    Is the “threat” to pensions no longer being used?

    Reply
  45. Katherine hamilton says:

    Nemo me impune lacessit.

    Reply
  46. heedtracker says:

    You never hear about it here in BBC UK world, but Ireland is desperately worried about nuclear waste pollution in the Irish sea and ofcourse the threat to Ireland itself. BBC/MSM propaganda machine no likee reporting any of it though.

    Ireland’s really worried about continual pollution from Sellafield in particular but the protests are completely ignored by teamGB, who tell them to piss off basically. And the £70+ billion Sellafield decommission costs don’t count when it comes to Westminster energy planning. Green energy spoils views, nuclear is some other suckers problem somewhere down the road.

    link to belfasttelegraph.co.uk

    link to stopnewnuclear.org.uk

    Reply
  47. galamcennalath says:

    @panda paws

    BritNats always struck me as a bit more Klingon, you know … glorification of war, superiority complex, no desent tolerated, democracy is for weaklings, and so on.

    Reply
  48. Croompensation, aye they’re hardcore against Salmond some of it laughable but it would almost put off yes voters for a good cause.

    Reply
  49. Derick Tulloch says:

    Energy related so more or less on topic. Er.

    I am sure Douglas Young of Yes Shetland won’t mind me sharing this! Smiley thing

    WORLD’S LARGEST OIL FIELD NOT FOUND

    You may remember the Prime Minister came to visit Shetland under the tightest secrecy ever seen in Shetland and the national press knew nothing about it. Nor the local press.

    Mr Cameron came to Shetland to say absolutely nothing about anything and allowed the local media 6 minutes of questions. Which he did not answer.

    Now you are all wondering why the PM made a very rushed, and hugely expensive trip to Shetland, missing his cabinet meeting, and just making it back to Glasgow for the Games.

    It is certainly nothing to do with the news that a drilling rig, not on contract to BP, and not in any way near the Clair Field did not suddenly de-man and send all the workers home and they are not on full pay.

    Nor has anyone on the Auld Rock overheard the rig manager say “Come back in September and don’t speak to anybody or you’re sacked.”

    The rig did not of course discover “sweet oil”, the most highly-prized stuff for turning into petroleum spirit, nor was it in shallower water than the normal 150m some of the other Clair oil is lurking at.

    Nor did it find it in quantities so large that “biggest” and “world” could be used in the same sentence. Definitely not.

    And we may not guess that Mr Cameron did not request the oil companies keep this massive wealth hidden from the Scottish electorate until after the referendum.

    He would never do that.

    Paul B Loyd Jr. h and t and t and p://www.rigzone.com/data/offshore_drilling_rigs/641/Semisub/Transocean_Ltd/Paul_B_Loyd_Jr
    (lat. 60.629° long. -2.603°)

    Shout it from the rooftops. The West of Shetland Oil makes the North Sea look like a puddle.

    Reply
  50. Mealer says:

    Westminster is a cesspit of sleaze and corruption.Nobody should believe a word they say.

    Reply
  51. gerry parker says:

    Water off a ducks back.

    But I still object to me paying for the shower putting this bilge out.

    Reply
  52. galamcennalath says:

    Paula Rose says:
    Is the “threat” to pensions no longer being used?

    Perhaps that one has too much potential to backfire. Southern tax payers won’t like the idea that Westminster is responsible of the pensions of everyone who has retired and has paid UK NI, no matter where they live. France, Australia … or iScotland. [Unless, post YES, TeamScotland negoitaes to take over that responsibility.]

    Reply
  53. Timorous Beastie says:

    @martincoull
    That appeared on my Facebook newsfeed this morning, probably based on the same source. I’d be wary of setting too much store in it at the moment.

    Reply
  54. martincoull says:

    Nice one Derek – that’s exactly what I’m on about…

    Reply
  55. thoughtsofascot says:

    Dig out that freepost address again and snd it right back to them.

    Reply
  56. martincoull says:

    Timorous Beastie – yes good point but can anyone on here do some digging? If the story is true, then it’s massive!

    Reply
  57. Marian says:

    Westminster must be really worried if they are bringing out another leaflet so soon after the last one.

    Things cannot be looking so rosy for them after all according to their private polling .

    How come they are allowed to get away with doing this anyway when all the participants in the referendum had to register and have their spending limits approved by the Electoral Commission?

    The cost of the first leaflet was put at £750,000 and now we have this one at unspecified cost paid for by taxpayers, but we can be sure that the combined costs of both will be way above what any other registered participant can spend.

    Its a poor consolation that the precedent has been set for the Scottish Government to do the same because the Westminster one will be shouted about from the rooftops by the BBC and newsprint media whilst we’ll never hear a cheep from them about the Scottish Government one.

    Reply
  58. Derick Tulloch says:

    A lot of rumour swirling around re West of Shetland.

    We do know that the crew of Paul B Loyd Jr. are stood down on full pay. Not often that happens.

    And we know that Clair Ridge (already proved) has at least 40 years of production ahead

    Whatever Paul B Loyd Jr. has found is additional to that.

    Reply
  59. wingman 2020 says:

    link to theguardian.com

    A menagerie of BTL trolls desperate to hurt Salmond.

    Reply
  60. BigRik says:

    Yes Wingman , i guess BT must be reading the runes to come away with the mince they predict , or maybe Mr Broon is using a Witch Doctor 🙂

    Reply
  61. BigRik says:

    Maybe the new leaflet will be Private Fraser telling us we are all DOOMED.

    Reply
  62. HandandShrimp says:

    If it transpires that yet another oil report was hushed up to prevent Scotland leaving the Union then I think we should have a re-run of the vote. Firstly so that people can vote with the full information to hand and secondly so that people can pass judgement on those that sought to hide such news.

    If such a thing involved BP and others I would also consider holding those people to account too. The bankers are facing fines and jail around the world, no reason why other corrupt business executives should not do likewise.

    Reply
  63. Drunken Hobo says:

    They keep pushing this “best of both worlds” nonsense, where they’re referring to having both a UK & Scottish Parliament.

    If it is the case where this genuinely is “best of both worlds”, then why did it take them 292 years to actually give us a Scottish Parliament, and why did they block it in the 1970s, ignoring the democratic vote in favour of it?

    All they’re saying is that it took them nearly three centuries to actually give Scotland what they think is the best deal. Why the hell would I want to be governed by people who think that’s a good thing?

    Reply
  64. Cag-does-thinking says:

    I’m sure there must be polling evidence that suggests that just threatening like this works or they wouldn’t use it but it surely looks something that Scotland would react badly to. Mind you, an oil producing country that can’t find somebody to give it’s energy to seems a unique problem. After all they just started building an electical interconnector from SW Scotlands to Wales a few weeks back. Don’t they intend to use it? I think this gets filed with the Danny Alexander back to the future vision of calamity. I just object to paying for it to be made and distributed and the hypocrisy of councils that are quite happy to make a political statement by naming streets after Keir Hardie but feel that a wee Yes sticker on a sign is likely to cause revolution in the streets as a “political” act.

    Reply
  65. galamcennalath says:

    Just been googling and reading around this potential Shetland oil find. Something is going on! I’m not sure what would be a more effective persuader to vote Yes … more oil … or the story that Westminster are involved in a coverup!

    The news, both ways, has to break before the 18th Sept.

    Reply
  66. panda paws says:

    @Thoughtsofascot says:

    Dig out that freepost address again

    Here it is.

    Better Together
    FREEPOST RTAU-ZCRB-TELS
    5 Blythswood Square
    Glasgow
    G2 4AD

    Reply
  67. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Could Cameron and the Viceroy have had secret meeting with the head of the Shetland Council and promised them a copious bounty if they secede and join rUK?

    How far off Shetland is the Claire field?

    Reply
  68. Molly says:

    Lordy Charlie Murphy, do you think it’s the same outfit who are trying make us imagine Johann Lamont is a stateswoman or even the Labour Party are socialists- con men indeed!

    That’s takes happiness into the realms of delusional

    Reply
  69. BigRik says:

    No no… don’t use freepost , just send in an envelope to the address ,they will have to pay 🙂

    Reply
  70. JimnArlene says:

    Lies, damned lies and more damned lies.

    Reply
  71. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Sill me, just googled it and it is 75KM from Shetland.

    So it would be in Scottish waters if Shetland seceded, because Shetland would be considered as being an enclave just like the Channel Islands and France.

    Reply
  72. donald anderson says:

    Will this be before they privatise the Post Office?

    Reply
  73. Les Wilson says:

    I read at some time that the SNP was considering exporting power to Europe via Norway.

    If that is indeed the case and our power enters the European grids, Westminster would still be buying our power and likely paying more for it?

    Reply
  74. Jim Murphy – Lecture tour to Dunoon.

    Fantastic disinterest in No Thanks message in the town Yesterday. Virtually no leaflets taken by public at all.

    Speech delivered to activits only. Had to move position 3 times to try to find an audience.

    Nae Luck Jimbo.

    It’s yer negative message that stinks bud.

    Reply
  75. Defo says:

    Re the rumours surrounding a big new oil find.
    The rig in question is reported as active/drilling, and is on hire to BP for $440,000/day. Add in operating costs, and that would be one hell of a lot of moolah BP would be spending to have a rig doing nothing, until after the 18th.

    I don’t believe in an interventionist God, but for those amongst us who do, you know the drill.

    link to offshore.no

    Reply
  76. muttley79 says:

    Another leading trade unionist in Scotland is supporting a Yes vote next month:

    link to yesscotland.net

    Reply
  77. Iain (orri) McCord says:

    Wonder if the coaching Salmond is getting is to help him deal with questions he’s heard for the umpteenth time as if they’re brand new and the questioner is genuinely interested in asking them?

    Have started finding myself getting a wee bit snappy and wonder if that’s been the plan all along. Need to be patient and not condescend. Treat them as reasonable fears and give the answers I have. On questions like the EU if pushed it’s worth mentioning that the as things stand Westminster could settle the issue once and for all but choose not to.

    If Salmond gets the balance right I’m sure Darling is going to make a complete fool of himself.

    Reply
  78. Liquid Lenny says:

    Les Wilson

    I heard Mr Salmond being interviewed on the Radio the other year, he said that he wanted to build an Interconnector to Norway, when the wind is blowing here, we pump their water up the hill (they have more hydro schemes than us) and when the wind is not blowing we can release the water and provide instant power in Scotland.
    We could also use it as a massive pump storage system for excess Tidal and Wave generated power as well.
    Obviously if the Interconnector is there then we can export electrickery to anywhere that Norway has interconnectors.

    Reply
  79. dan huil says:

    Rev, please find out more about oil discovery west of Shetland and, if true, give it top billing.

    Reply
  80. ken says:

    2 respected academics from Robert Gordon University… Is that an oxymoron?

    Also nice to see the writer is an expert on European law. I wonder if he could elaborate on the freedom of movement and the exclusion of those that have moved to England, only to be disenfranchised…

    Reply
  81. Muscleguy says:

    @Liquid Lenny

    The EU is looking into building a continent spanning HV DC superconducting spine, that can itself store electricity, and one limb is slated to run up the middle of the North Sea. The idea is that when the wind blows and waves get up and the rain fills hydro schemes we can send power south and when the sun shines on solar thermal plants in Spain and the Maghreb they can send power north, almost without loss.

    Scotland will be well placed to plug into that. But of course doing it in the union means we will have to help pay for it but Westminster will reap the benefits, those that don’t go to poorly regulated power companies of course.

    BTW I really hope the Herald on Sunday runs with the Clair oil field story.

    Oh and my No supporting wife reacted with fury to the news that we have a new oil field. All of a sudden she is worried for the planet. Usually she tries not to think about it as she commutes long distance and flies for work. I pointed out that just because the oil is there doesn’t mean we have to exploit it at all and secondly if we do then we don’t have to do so at full tilt. But no dice.

    This is the sort of thing we are up against. Good news for Scotland cannot be good. As for this being hidden from voters before the referendum, no comment from her.

    Reply
  82. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    Westminster isn’t bluffing ,Stu. It’s lying

    Reply
  83. Defo says:

    Re the ‘mothballed’ oilrig, again.

    It’s contracted to be there until 03/15.

    link to klenergypublishing.com

    Reply
  84. Dave McEwan Hill says:

    ken says at 3.01

    “those that have moved to England, only to be disenfranchised…

    What? In England where they actually live? Surely not.

    Reply
  85. David Smith says:

    On the subject of renewables; is there not an element of tidal generation incorporated into the Clyde Barrage proposal?

    Reply
  86. Papadox says:

    This bunch of thugs, thieves, liars, con artists, and scumbags that are the establishment who manipulate GB to their own selfish advantage. They have the rights and privilege to terrify, bully and scare the elderly, poor and frightened into handing over their lives to this scum by outright lying.

    If the bullying and scares don’t work then they promise to give you a kicking and rub your nose in it to show their love for Scotland and the Scots, then they’ll steal your money by mugging you and piss all over you.

    What a lot of shit they are. Just because they have smart suites ENGLISH accents and the EBC to shove their lies for them we are supposed to feel inferior to a bunch of gangsters and snobs.

    If we want to run our own lives they promise all sorts of nasty retribution and evils will be visited upon Scotland. THESE are the people who profess love for us. IS ANYBODY IN SCOTLAND THAT F****** STUPID. They will heap vengeance upon us for trusting them.

    When you talk of west of Shetland or the Atlantic shelf, they avoid it like the plague. Because they know the story and provided they don’t knowing tell lies then that’s ok, best way round that is to not mention or engage in it till after the referendum and even then the least the better.

    Too wee – no. Too poor – definitely no Too STUPID we’ll see that’s an open question.

    Reply
  87. bookie from hell says:

    Huge new poll before tues debate

    http://scotgoespop.blogspot.co.uk

    Reply
  88. seanair says:

    Liquid Lenny
    I never received one either, which annoyed me because I was going to “return to sender” and cost BT money. Now allegedly another is on the way so I’ll get my wee bit of pleasure.
    Meanwhile, along with hundreds of others, I am delivering copies of the booklet “Your Choice” all round the country, and a Yes newspaper is promised soon. No boys from Derby/Liverpool involved.

    Reply
  89. cirsium says:

    So, we have

    1. the Investors’ Chronicle reporting that the UK Government is

    deliberately downplaying the potential of the UK Continental Shelf (UKSC) ahead of September’s referendum on Scottish independence

    2. Mr Cameron pays a strictly unofficial visit to Shetland

    3. rumours circulating about a massive oil find

    4. the drilling suspended on the rig which is linked to the rumours

    5. the rig in question is on hire to BP whose CEO (or is it Chairman) Robert Dudley has already spoken out against independence.

    The UK government has already replayed all the scare stories from the 1979 referendum so is this McCrone 2.0?

    Reply
  90. heedtracker says:

    One incredible way of reducing Scottish CO 2 green house gas pollution is to reforest Scotland’s vast and empty wilderness.

    Well it’s not an empty wilderness. In a couple of weeks time, the glorious 12th of August comes and Scotland’s hills and mountains become an open air abattoir for the upperclass teamGB elite to shoot everything and anything they can. Their men have already shot and poisoned hundreds of birds of prey and everything else living, flora and fauna is burnt off the hills, year after year so the shooting is unimpeded by stuff, like trees etc.

    The highland slaughter makes a few landowners a lot of money but when you consider the potential of an actual healthy ecosystems in terms of tourism alone, once again Scotland gets raped and pillaged by the rich.

    How about a pair of guns for your average blood sports man and woman?

    link to purdey.com if you need to ask, you certainly can’t afford. And it’s long way from whatever your average Scottish worker earns too, try 5x, and double it.

    Salmon fishing used to be incredible in Scotland but same maniacs have fished Scottish wild salmon to extinction and now they blame whales and dolphins, I shit you not.

    Reply
  91. Defo says:

    You find interesting stuff, in the strangest of places.
    See page 6

    link to seafish.org

    BP are currently laying 22″ oil, and 9″ gas pipelines from the area that the ghost rig is operating, to connect into the mains Clare pipe.

    Reply
  92. Derick Tulloch says:

    Defo – that pipeline is for the existing proved Clair ridge field. The one referred to above is a new discovery.

    ‘Biggest in the world’ is pushing it, but it’s clearly a significant discovery. So much so that it’s being kept quiet. Bit of fail on that front: it’s not 1979 and the BBC is not the only source of news any more.

    Attracting a fair few ‘No voters’ on here I see. Ho ho!

    Reply
  93. muttley79 says:

    @Paradox

    We are trying to build an inclusive movement here. Is it really necessary to mention ‘English accents,’ when we have the likes of Jim Murphy, Johann Lamont, Ruth Davidson, Ian Davidson, Douglas Alexander etc to contend with?

    Reply
  94. Grendel says:

    My reply to this article:
    link to savestraitonforscotland.com
    So a No vote in September will end this? Dream on! A change of government or a rejection of independence will not be enough to stop developments like this stone dead. An amendment to the 2006 Planning Act Scotland, surprisingly submitted by the Green Party, allowing third party right of appeals against windfarms was rejected by a coalition of Labour, Conservatives and Lib Dems. In the long term EVERY main party (and the Lib Dems) are committed to greener, cleaner energy, and damn anything that gets in the way.

    If you think it’s bad just now, then why not Vote No, and sit back and wait for them to start fracking in Scotland. Control over this was devolved, but secretely pinched back by the House of Lords so they could start issuing licences to their chums.

    A cowardly No vote is a green light for Westminster to crack on with emasculating the Scottish Parliament and extending the English and Welsh National Planning Guidelines to this country. If you thought objecting to these developments was hard now, what will it be like after a No vote?

    Reply
  95. Defo says:

    BTW A 22″ pipe carries 178,000 Barrels/day

    link to sama.sk.ca
    (Page 6)

    Getting the picture yet ? At 50% tax take, on $100/barrel, gives nigh on $9m odd/day to help pay off the banksters debts.
    Not to mention leaving a few £££ for the party, and the old boys.

    link to gov.uk

    Reply
  96. kininvie says:

    From Defo’s link above, the Paul Loyd is located on block 206/9a – which is part of the Clair field WoS. Although we don’t know exactly what it was drilling, it was probably involved in BP’s work on appraising/developing Phase 3 of Clair. Hence it is unlikely to have found an entirely new oil field, but may have made some additional discovery with the (440 sq km) Clair field.

    There are a couple of things which make me suspicious though:

    If a significant discovery is made, which may affect the share price, a public company, such as BP is duty bound to announce it to the stock market. Of course, there’s a bit of leeway while the company evaluates its data and agrees the timing of any announcement with its partners. The management of BP (a global company) simply would not/could not countenance govt pressure to delay announcing.

    If such a discovery is made, the last thing the company would wish to do is to send its workforce off the rig, because the chances of a leak and a false market in the shares would be increased.

    A more likely reason is that there may have been pressure/temperature issues in the well which challenged the rig’s parameters, and the well may have been suspended while to operator works out what to do.

    As for DC flying to Shetland – he’s not going to learn anything there that he can’t get directly from BP’s HQ.

    Reply
  97. Defo says:

    Derick Tulloch. As you say, it’s for a new discovery. It’s being laid as we speak, to the area where the ghost rig is operating.

    Reply
  98. Papadox says:

    Muttley79 3:43

    Sorry to upset you. I was referring to the Westminster establishment and the EBC English accents which are very prevalent at the GLASGOW commonwealth games.

    Reply
  99. JWil says:

    Anas Sarwar was in in a shopping car park in East Kilbride today with his campaign bus and his bunch of merry men. I managed to get a word to him, that they were causing an obstruction.

    Reply
  100. Defo says:

    kininvie, glad to see we have industry expertise here.
    Over to you guys (and the Dear Leader, if there’s substance to it all obvs), my amateurish work is done.

    Reply
  101. wingman 2020 says:

    link to flightradar24.com

    Watch the helicopters in and around the NE… a few days ago there was one going around in wide circles for hours, about 50 – 80 miles off of Wick

    Nothing but scheduled flights at the moment.

    Reply
  102. wingman 2020 says:

    @Defo

    What are the coordinates for this ‘ghost rig’?

    Reply
  103. heedtracker says:

    The management of BP (a global company) simply would not/could not countenance govt pressure to delay announcing.

    And yet they all, UK.gov, BP, Shell, withheld the McCrone report from Scotland as easy as pie.

    link to oilofscotland.org

    Reply
  104. Croompenstein says:

    @kininvie – As for DC flying to Shetland – he’s not going to learn anything there that he can’t get directly from BP’s HQ

    I dunno kininvie something stinks, why was he there then? The PM of GB does not drop everything to go to Shetland for a jolly

    Reply
  105. Peter A Bell says:

    The key phrase in the UK Government’s threat to stop buying electricity from Scotland and obtain it from France instead is “to the extent it was cheaper”. It doesn’t take a genius to work out that it couldn’t possibly be cheaper as increased demand would inevitable increase the price of an already strained supply.

    Like every “argument” that the British nationalists come up with this one doesn’t stand up to so much as a moment’s casual scrutiny.

    Reply
  106. Andy-B says:

    Read this pathetic attempt at scaremongering in the Evening Times, no doubt its more taxpayers money wasted on those lying leaflets.

    link to eveningtimes.co.uk

    Reply
  107. David S Briggs says:

    bookie from hell says:

    ‘Huge new poll before tues debate’

    Might be nothing to do with the debate. Surely it would be a Poll of the audience prior to and after the debate.
    Putting forward a survey that includes tricksy questions designed to ellicit a looked for response that favours either side would be a step to far for STV, but in all likelihood not for the BBC.

    Would STV play dirty with the SNP who are after all involved in the discussions over what form the programme will take? Personally I think it’s more than their reputation is worth.

    Reply
  108. Ken500 says:

    Cameron and Osbourne wandering about the UK handing out public money to private companies (bribe) for political gain. It’s illegal.

    Reply
  109. Inbhir Anainn says:

    The new leaflet coming through your letter boxes will contain the following (guff from the HM Government):

    Here are five ways we’ll benefit by staying in the United Kingdom.

    Keep the pound.
    The pound is one of the most strongest and stable currencies in the world. Staying in the UK is the only way Scotland can keep the strength of the Bank of England and the pound as we have now. Setting up a new currency for an Independent Scotland would be costly and risky.

    More support for public services.
    Currently, Scotland benefits from public spending per person that is around 10% higher than the UK average. Taxpayers across the UK help fund the vital public services we need such as health and education. The long-term financial benefit of staying in the UK is worth up to £1,400 a year* to each person in Scotland.

    One economy, more jobs.
    Scotland trades more with the rest of the UK than with the rest of the world combined. Hundreds of thousands of Scottish jobs are connected to trade with the UK. A new international border and a different currency system would make trade harder and cost jobs at a time when the UK economy is recovering.

    Cheaper bills
    The UK’s financial standing keeps interest rates low. That means cheaper mortgages and loans. Plus our greater size makes household bills cheaper. Staying in the UK would keep future energy bills for Scottish households up to £189 a year lower.**

    Best of both worlds
    The Scottish Parliament already decides important matters like health and education, and more powers for Scotland are guaranteed. And, as part of the UK family, we benefit by sharing resources and pooling risks. By staying together, we can have more decisions taken here in Scotland backed by the strength, stability and security of the UK.

    * Bource: Scotland analysis: Fiscal policy and sustainability, HM Government, May 2014.

    ** Source: Scotland analysis: Energy, HM Government, April 2014.

    Reply
  110. Ken500 says:

    The Scottish Gov was voted by a majority of voters on a manifesto to hold a Referendum funded by taxpayers money.

    No one in Scotland or the UK voted to allow BT to use taxpayers money to canvass against a YES result in the Scottish Referedum. BT was not elected.

    In fact politicians in Westminster who oppose a YES vote in the Referedum, stated that it was a matter for the Scottish people not them.

    A Westminster politician who fronts BT, Alistair Darling lives in London, and will not have a vote. Yet is having a major negative say about the Referendum.

    Reply
  111. The Last outpost of FibDems on Shetland get a Tory PM and presumably the Security Services holding Shetland in LOCK-DOWN until after Sept18th ?

    The Sec of State for Scotland – Gagged?

    Diddy-Danny Alexander, Treasury Minister – gagged

    Mundell, his humiliation relieved by ennoblement – KNOWS his place – junior to fibdem Carmichael.

    Charles Kennedy – SILENCED. (WITH A WEE HAUF )?

    We Scots must rid ourselves of all these LIARS who serve no-one but themselves.

    If these revelations about a new find of Massive Oil Reserves are true – the people, the electorate must be told.

    I suggest we keep a close eye on RT, Al JAZEERA or the American tv and Media – for info that applies to Scots ?

    Another despicable betrayal by BT

    Reply
  112. Croompenstein says:

    @Wanton – Charles Kennedy – SILENCED. (WITH A WEE HAUF )?

    Not quite, here he is selling his country down the river for his Tory masters, probably got a wee doch and doris for this..from 9:30 in the PMQ’s

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  113. Defo says:

    Wingman.
    I can’t find exact coordinates, only the block no.
    I need to do real life stuff right now, but i’ll have another swatch later.

    Reply
  114. Derick Tulloch says:

    link to rigzone.com

    (lat. 60.629° long. -2.603°

    Reply
  115. Robert Peffers says:

    @Les Wilson says:2 August, 2014 at 2:29 pm:” If that is indeed the case and our power enters the European grids, Westminster would still be buying our power and likely paying more for it?”

    Err! Les, I don’t think you quite understand how electricity grids work. It goes like this – imagine, if you will, that the grid is a great big Water Tank. It has some big pipes at the top filling the tank up and each filling pipe comes from a different stream. At the bottom are lots of wee pipes going out to different places to smaller tanks. So the water going in is measured and paid for by the big tank’s owners. The water going out is measured and the water going out is paid for by the users to the tank’s owners. So, by being connected to the existing grid, that extends already to the continent, Scotland is already able to export energy to continental countries. If English consumers don’t buy it doesn’t matter as the grid has already paid for it and gets its profit from whoever does buy it.

    Reply
  116. Auld Sandy says:

    Regarding the leaflet and ‘UK’ jobs, here’s my job history – worked for UK company now Swiss owned, worked for UK company now German owned, worked for UK company now Belgian owned, worked for UK company now US owned. There’s more but you’re probably bored and have the picture already.

    The loss of UK ownership of these companies was a direct result of Maggie Thatcher’s policies and this was then followed by job losses from all of these overseas-owned companies in the UK during Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s periods in charge.

    Job security by staying in the UK? No chance – Vote YES

    Reply
  117. Ken500 says:

    C Kennedy’s love in with Gove on QT. Puke

    Reply
  118. ken says:

    Oh my goodness, nobody here does their research. Also, the word ‘allegedly’ crops up far too much. Wild salmon is not extinct. Stop talking about renewables, its not going to happen in the next 30 years. There are lots of oil fields that have been found and are been drilled to assess probable oil, its not a secret! Do some reasearch on the stock exchange and you will find the companies doing it…allegedly

    Reply
  119. Robert Peffers says:

    @Andy-B says:2 August, 2014 at 4:26 pm:

    “Read this pathetic attempt at scaremongering in the Evening Times, no doubt its more taxpayers money wasted on those lying leaflets.

    link to eveningtimes.co.uk

    Whit! You guys have been cheatet – We Fifers got a BT leaflet with 10 lies Err! Err! Ahem! Promises on it.

    Reply
  120. Croompenstein says:

    @ken – please provide some links for your ‘alleged’ assertions

    Reply
  121. ken says:

    Auld sandy… Clearly you have had so many jobs because you have been fired for stupidity…allegedly. You plan to vote yes so you don’t have to live in a capitalist society… Has someone told you that an independent Scotland will be a socialist eutopia where no company is owned by a foreigner? Maybe you should just stop applying to companies owned by foreign companies? PS, not quite sure I follow your Thatcher argument….. Seems flawed

    Reply
  122. Defo says:

    Don’t bite ffs. It’ll go away hungry.

    Reply
  123. Paula Rose says:

    Auld Sandy – are there any major manufacturing companies in the UK still owned here, and some later commenter said you wanted to live in a eutopia, but I don’t know what that is.

    Reply
  124. ken says:

    As for renewables… We can’t even store the energy created from wind turbines… It does really make it easy to plan future energy resources now, does it?

    Reply
  125. Black Douglas says:

    oh goodie we have a new 👿 to play with or an old one with a new name? 😀

    Reply
  126. ken says:

    Paula… Eutopia E U topia. Presumably the irony is lost on you

    Reply
  127. Davy says:

    And todays Gold Medal for being a Troll-Twat, goe’s to “ken”, of course he has proberly won this award under various other names in the past (Dugie, Hothersall, Smart, Alexander) etc.

    Reply
  128. Paula Rose says:

    This whole energy thing is very important – it is controlled by the Scottish government isn’t it?

    Reply
  129. Paula Rose says:

    Oh – and Auld Sandy is the US in the EU?

    Reply
  130. ken says:

    No, but Germany is, and Belgium, allegedly

    Reply
  131. ken says:

    Eww, please don’t play with me

    Reply
  132. Paula Rose says:

    Anyone ken what is going on? There are some weird comments appearing.

    Reply
  133. Oui Things says:

    I was going to scan one and e-mail the pics Rev, looks like you’re on it.

    Reply
  134. D'jeelius Chinokiooo says:

    Whether the US was in the EU, it would not validate his argument, the western world is capitalist. Nobody tell him that only one of the super-majors operating in Scotland is British

    Reply
  135. Croompenstein says:

    @Auld Sandy – My dad used to drive lorries he started out in an old Albion then a Commer, Scammel, AEC, ERF, GUY and a Leyland Marathon. What happened to all these British manufacturers? Cars used to be made by British companies too

    Reply
    • donald anderson says:

      Croompenstein

      I once sailed from Sheildhall, Glasgow and the cargo was; Leyland buses, made in Scotstoun, Sewing machines-Clydebank, Scotch whisky and ammunition from goodness knows where in Scotland. You can tell how long a go that was. If the Bitters could make “Scotch” elsewhere they would.

      Reply
  136. Phil Robertson says:

    There is a paradox at the heart of the SG aspirations for electricity.

    The healthy state at present both in terms of output and cost is very dependent on nuclear and fossil fuels. From the latest figures 70pc still comes from these sources and they remain the cheapest as well.

    Reply
  137. Papadox says:

    Has anyone asked David Cameron, BP, or any other relevant government department what is known about exploration and results of any exploration/evaluation or indications of oil/gas/condensates in the Atlantic margin especially west of shetland.

    Are there any other positive indicators in any other part of UK waters? Does HMG or any of its departments have any of this information available to it?

    Is HMG or any of its departments secreting any such information?

    HMG AVOIDS any mention of any resources outside the “North Sea” which seems to be in some strange places. I AM A SYNIC about anything these thugs have a hand in.

    Reply
  138. Croompenstein says:

    @Phil – have you actually read the links Stu provided?

    Reply
  139. Paula Rose says:

    Croompenstein dear – he can hardly spell, I doubt multi-tasking is within his skill set.

    Reply
  140. thedogphilosopher says:

    A Ken Troll?

    Reply
  141. Croompenstein says:

    @donald – All that was before the union died, all we have to do is drive the stake through it’s heart 🙂

    Reply
  142. callum says:

    I sailed past the Netherlands wind farms in the North Sea a few weeks ago, stopped counting when I reached 200 of these enormous double-the-size windmills. An awesome sight.

    Reply
  143. Croompenstein says:

    @callum – better not tell the folk from Straiton that

    Reply
  144. Phil Robertson says:

    Croompenstein
    Don’t see anything in the links to gainsay the two facts that I mentioned. Most of Scottish electricity still comes from nuclear and fossil fuel generation and those are still markedly cheaper than electricity from the renewable technologies.

    Paula rose
    I’d be interested to know what you think is wrong with the spelling in my post.

    Reply
  145. Paula Rose says:

    e

    Reply
  146. Paula Rose says:

    Just between you and me Phil – do you actually have a good reason why we should keep the UK?

    Reply
  147. Paula Rose says:

    Ok Phil – in public – do you actually have a good reason why we should continue as the UK?

    Reply
  148. macart763m says:

    So right on the coat tails of the Investors Chronicle’s claim that HMG was lying its ass off on the profitability of the oil industry, we have this?

    Oh Jeez. 😀

    I still don’t get it. Why on earth would anyone vote to retain a governmental system that serially abuses the trust of its own electorate? We’re better than that and we can do better ourselves.

    Reply
  149. Auld Rock says:

    Once again just pop it in any old envelope, make sure your name is not on it, and address to:-

    Better Together
    FREEPOST
    RTAU-ZCRB-TELS
    5 Blythswood Sq
    GLASGOW
    G2-4AD

    Remember that every letter returned has to be paid for and accounted for in their expenses. This address is also useful to send back all rubbish e.g. ‘two faced flags’ etc, oh take off stick first, uneless you fancy sticking it somewhere that the sun doesn’t shine, LOL.

    Auld Rock

    Reply
  150. Auld Sandy says:

    To those confused by my earlier post, I should maybe have pointed out that almost all of the UK companies I worked for were based in England (only 1 in Scotland and 1 in Wales) and my point was that there is NO increased guarantee of job security by sticking with the current UK arrangement, as claimed by the UK Government in their leaflet, as the decisions are made by company owners who do not necessarily have any great commitment to the UK, except, in some cases, as a route to the European market
    For ken’s benefit, I was never fired from any job, but occasionally moved to better jobs, until the industry I worked in had largely disappeared from the UK and what was left was mainly foreign owned. During Thatcher’s reign she encouraged profiteering in the Stock market leading to companies driving for higher share prices in the short term, at the expense of longer term re-investment in their own organisation. Eventually you can only maximise your return on this by selling your shares – and in many cases in the UK the most likely buyers were from overseas. Only the recent attempted takeover of the Anglo-Swedish Astra Zeneca seems to have made the UK government aware of the dangers of this approach.
    Further clarification for ken – I won’t vote Yes because I still live in England and don’t have a vote, I have no problems with old fashioned capitalism, being a shareholder and having savings in stocks and shares ISA’s etc. I expect to be personally worse off if Scotland votes Yes, but, Proud Scot that I am, am convinced it is the right thing for Scotland and its present and future residents – and I’ll maybe one day move home and allow my rUK pension to be taxed in Scotland to help pay for a better fairer society, even if it’s not quite Utopia!

    Reply
  151. Caroline Corfield says:

    Hehe. Goan yersel Auld Sandy, heaven forfend that we refuse to wear the stereotypes they have made for us!

    Reply
  152. Caroline Corfield says:

    Found this earlier too;

    Report from 2013.

    link to drillingcontractor.org

    “Investment in offshore oil and gas projects is forecast to rise to a record level of at least £13 billion (US $19.6 billion) this year, up from £11.4 billion (US $17.3 billion) last year. “As a result, thousands of jobs are now being created across Britain, and the production of UK oil and gas and resulting tax revenues can now confidently be expected to rise over the coming years,” the survey stated. The recent surge in investments is also expected to lead to a significant upturn in production over the next three to four years, rising to approximately 2 million bbls of oil equivalent/day by 2017.”

    “In contrast, exploration and appraisal for gas is “almost dead at this moment in time. The truth of the matter is that the UK gas space in exploration and appraisal drilling has been appalling recently.” So far this year, there has been no exploration and appraisal drilling in the historically strong southern gas sector. “The trend of recent years has been pretty poor. In 2008, there were 18 exploration and appraisal wells, which dropped to six in 2009. There were 14 overall in 2010, seven in 2011, two in 2012 and so far none this year. We generally look at it as not a healthy trend. It’s still a major gas production area and probably about half a dozen or so fields still under development by a number of operators, but E&A has much diminished.””

    Reply
  153. Derick Tulloch says:

    The Laggan and Tormore gas condensate fields are located approximately 125km north-west of the Shetland Islands, on the edge of the continental shelf. {Owners : TOTAL E&P UK Ltd & DONG E&P (UK) Ltd}

    DECC estimates that approximately 17% of the remaining UK Oil and Gas Reserves are located in the WoS region.

    Edradour, Total’s latest UK development to receive sanction will tie in to our infrastructure.

    The produced hydrocarbons will be transported to Shetland via 2 x 143 km 18” import flowlines at a peak gas rate of 500 MMscfd.

    Processed gas will be exported via the SIRGE System (234km 30” pipeline) to the existing FUKA pipeline. Peak capacity = 665 MMscfd.

    Capacity in SIRGE earmarked for Laggan-Tormore and future developments of Rosebank and Clair Ridge.

    During peak construction there are likely to be over 2000 people employed on site. The total development cost of the project will be in the order of £3.3 billion.

    The Laggan-Tormore project represents a strategic investment, opening up the West of Shetland for future development

    link to laggan-tormore.com

    Reply
  154. Derick Tulloch says:

    Solan oil field lies in block 205/26a of production license P164 located in the UK North Sea. It is located west of the Shetland Islands in 135m deep waters. Premier Oil is the operator of the field with 60% interest. Chrysaor owns the remaining 40% interest.

    The Field Development Plan (FDP) for the Solan field was approved by the UK Government in April 2012. First production from the field is expected towards the end of 2014. Initial production rate is expected at 24,000 barrels of oil each day.

    The field has an estimated life of 20 years.

    link to offshore-technology.com

    Reply
  155. Derick Tulloch says:

    And this (8 storey high) baby intended for Solan was off-loaded aff Lerwick last week.

    link to shetlandtimes.co.uk

    There is a shit load of oil West of Shetland which even with those fields that have been publicly announced – will last until at least the 2050s. This is why Sullom Voe Terminal is currently undergoing an £800,000,000 upgrade.

    Reply
  156. Derick Tulloch says:

    Incidentally. Follow the ‘Marine Traffic AIS’ link on the Shetland Times website, zoom out and just Northwest of Foula is the Paul B Lloyd Jr – hover over the blue icon and the name and speed of the vessel is shown.
    link to marinetraffic.com

    Reply
  157. Andy says:

    20% of an independent Scotland’s GDP would be made up of hydrocarbon exports. Scotland would be a net exporter of hydrocarbons and rUK would be an importer.

    Under these conditions, what is the sense in using Sterling, a currency that would respond to exogenous shocks in a way completely inappropriate for an independent Scotland?

    Suppose the world oil prices rose sharply due to geopolitical events in the Middle-East: this would be economically beneficial for Scotland, supporting its balance of payments, easing its fiscal constraint, leading to more investment in oil extraction and creating more demand in the largest industrial sector. But at the same time, this would worsen the balance of payments in the UK and lower domestic demand. Under most governance arrangements for the Bank of England, this scenario would be more likely to lead to lower rather than higher interest rates. This would be the opposite response to what would be needed in Scotland. Having lower interest rates at a time that the economy is growing strongly would add to the real exchange rate appreciation.

    link to niesr.ac.uk

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,718 Posts, 1,214,035 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on The tint of rose: “Your interpretation does not mesh with reality, Xaracen. In reality, if the vote was intended to separately determine the fates…Mar 14, 06:37
    • sarah on Off-topic: “I gave that slogan to Swinney during the general election when he visited a nearby heritage site that was central…Mar 13, 23:24
    • sarah on The tint of rose: “@ Mia at 7.30 p.m. Very well explained, Mia – comprehensible to the meanest understanding, one would think.Mar 13, 23:13
    • Xaracen on The tint of rose: “Hatey said; “We voted Remain by 62% on a turnout of 67.2%. By the inexorable laws of maths, we can…Mar 13, 22:58
    • Tinto Chiel on Off-topic: “Stuart McHardy cuts through the crap re The Jacobites: www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx7fJY1hr98 Remember history is usually written by the victors unless the…Mar 13, 21:18
    • Hatey McHateface on The tint of rose: “Boo hoo, Mia gurnin aboot being “forced oot o the EU agin oor will” again. Hindsight is, of course, a…Mar 13, 20:38
    • Mia on The tint of rose: ““I cannot see anything which would suggest that the treaty intended to retain two separate sovereign states with their respective…Mar 13, 19:30
    • Hatey McHateface on Signal and noise: ““she hates the English with a venom” Are you sure? Has she tried to get them jailed on trumped-up sexual…Mar 13, 18:52
    • Hatey McHateface on Signal and noise: “Good point, Lorn. Still, part of living your best trans life requires somebody to take a (hopefully sharp) knife to…Mar 13, 18:47
    • agent x on Signal and noise: ““what are the odds on Sturgeon running for MP in the UK Parliament at the next opportunity?” Zero chance -…Mar 13, 18:31
    • diabloandco on Signal and noise: “Oops! Sorry Rev!Mar 13, 18:10
    • agent x on Signal and noise: “Eric Trump at Bute House with Swinney today.Mar 13, 17:11
    • sarah on Signal and noise: “Nothing is happening politically – not for independence nor as competent government. Holyrood currently is a toxic puddle – gone…Mar 13, 17:00
    • diabloandco on Signal and noise: “He had a more black and white view of diversity.Mar 13, 16:26
    • diabloandco on Signal and noise: “He had a more black and white view of diversity.Mar 13, 16:21
    • Xaracen on The tint of rose: “Aidan said: “in context of over 300 years of union governance, I think we have to see the fundamental principles…Mar 13, 16:12
    • Sven on Signal and noise: “Charles (non R one) My money would still be on her looking for a post with the EU or UN.…Mar 13, 15:55
    • TURABDIN on Signal and noise: “Signals & Noises in a land far, far away….. RWANDA, new «enriched» kid, thanx2UK, on the neo imperalist block… https://archive.is/k4YGa…Mar 13, 15:24
    • John McGregor on Signal and noise: “Ave no priblem way men dressing as womem but as long as they have awe their bits they are MEN…Mar 13, 15:04
    • Charles (not the R one) on Signal and noise: “Don’t forget this – the only reason the SNP is able to behave like this, is because so many Scottish…Mar 13, 14:58
    • willie on Signal and noise: “Why should we worry about the country that Scotland has become. We allowed it to happen. Economic stagnation over the…Mar 13, 13:37
    • Lorn on Signal and noise: “Well, Hatey, you are going to have to explain that one to the four (at the last count) ‘men’ who…Mar 13, 12:54
    • Aidan on Signal and noise: “In another turn of events Sarah is partially right and Stuart is partially wrong. Designation as a non-self governing territory…Mar 13, 12:29
    • Marie on Signal and noise: “I agree but we need to fight for Scotland’s historical legacy as an epicentre of enlightened thinking. Political parties that…Mar 13, 11:13
    • diabloandco on Signal and noise: “I used to be proud of Scotland but now I see it as a land of misogyny, perverted beyond belief…Mar 13, 09:43
    • Dave G on Signal and noise: ““Scotland’s top gender law specialist” as ITV dubs her is actually an English barrister (she has a Scottish father) who…Mar 13, 09:30
    • TURABDIN on Signal and noise: “«all within the law, none outside the law, none against the law» pace Benito MUSSOLINIMar 13, 09:11
    • 100%Yes on The evolution of fairness: “Sara, Your correct the UN Decolonisation of Scotland is a winner for so many reason. Its progress, when all we…Mar 13, 08:59
    • Frank Gillougley on Signal and noise: “Maggie Chapman was born in the wrong body and she is also a time-traveller. She was born as Lavrenty Pavlovich…Mar 13, 07:26
    • Hatey McHateface on Signal and noise: ““Don’t you want an independent Scotland to be the first islamic country in the EU?” I want the Islamic leader…Mar 13, 07:10
  • A tall tale



↑ Top