The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Missing the point of a referendum

Posted on November 15, 2011 by

Scottish Labour embarrassed themselves horribly today when they jumped on comments from SNP MSP Stewart Maxwell in which he noted that the Scottish Government was only legally empowered to hold an advisory referendum on independence rather than a binding one. Not withstanding the fact that ALL referenda in the UK are only advisory, whether conducted by Holyrood or Westminster or anyone else, Labour’s humiliating blunder was in triumphantly asserting there was something new about this position, when in fact the very first sentence of the SNP’s National Conversation website – dating back over two years – says the exact same thing:

“The First Minister has outlined plans for a public consultation on a draft Referendum Bill which sets out proposals for an advisory referendum on extending the powers of the Scottish Parliament.”

But there’s another aspect to the nature of referenda that everyone seems to be inexplicably overlooking of late. The Unionist parties have recently ramped up a campaign in which they demand the SNP “clarify” every last item of policy in an independent Scotland, from currency and EU membership to renewable energy transmission costs, pension provision, and all the way down to what colour the First Minister’s going to paint Bute House’s front door. What nobody seems to have grasped is the fairly crucial point that that’s not what a referendum is for.

Referenda are not for deciding multiple policies. Nobody campaigned in the AV referendum on a platform of cutting the 50p tax rate or investing in public transport, they campaigned on whether they wanted AV or not. An independence referendum resolves one issue and one issue alone: who elects the next government.

In Scotland’s case, the referendum will determine whether from that point on it’s the people of Scotland who get to choose Scotland’s government, or (as at present) the people of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. The policies of that government – and every one that follows it – will be decided by regular elections.

The Conservative Party, for example, is against UK membership of the Euro. If Scotland votes for independence in the referendum, Scotland will not then move to join the Euro, because the referendum is not about Euro membership. What will happen is that we’ll have a general election in May 2016, parties will stand in that election on a comprehensive policy platform which will include how they feel about joining the Euro, and the people of Scotland will vote for them.

The government and Parliament that comes into being as a result of the election is what gets to decide whether we join the Euro or not – and indeed, everything else down to the FM’s door hue.

If Scotland became independent the Scottish Conservatives could, if they wanted, campaign for election on a platform that they’d immediately apply to rejoin the Union. If they won a majority, they would be perfectly entitled to pursue that policy. It would of course be highly controversial, because the opposition would claim that people had voted for them on the balance of a whole raft of reasons, and might not necessarily approve of that specific one. The Tories might retort that those were cancelled out by some voters having voted for other parties even though they supported reunification, because on balance they preferred the manifesto of those parties.

It’s a tricky dilemma, because you can’t reasonably infer someone’s position on an individual policy when what they’ve actually done is choose their overall favourite out of several 50-policy packages. Which is precisely why we occasionally have specific, single-issue referenda that determine one thing and one thing alone, and why we keep them separate from elections. Am I the only one who gets that?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Allen Aitken

well worded,

I pleased Labour won control of Glasgow city council.
Labour Must win back seats Like Glasgow Kelvin
and also Glasgow Anniesland. I am strong Labour
voter.

Appleby

That’s nice dear. Do you have a point to make or are you just pleased you and yours are not in the dole queue and have to get a proper job?


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,707 Posts, 1,212,857 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • gregor on The thickness of blood: “Trans cult in position of NHS power. What could go wrong…Feb 15, 16:55
    • Marie on The thickness of blood: “I’m a yes voter who despises the Scottish Government.Feb 15, 16:53
    • Dan on The thickness of blood: “Still doing it when I try to switch between older and new articles. Sod this, goes off to delete yet…Feb 15, 16:45
    • Hatey McHateface on The thickness of blood: “Defo some lasting damage from watching an Australian antisemitic shortarse spouting Hollywood script writer’s shite, particularly if, like gregor, she…Feb 15, 16:42
    • Marie on The thickness of blood: “We don’t have freedom of speech and we don’t live in a democracy – that’s why we don’t take a…Feb 15, 16:38
    • LondonScot on The thickness of blood: “Given that × hormones lead to osteoporosis, I wonder if Peter/Patricia’s wheelchair use is connected to that rather than fibromyalgia?…Feb 15, 16:38
    • Marie on The thickness of blood: “A trans woman who has a penis? That’s called a man.Feb 15, 16:36
    • Mark Beggan on The thickness of blood: “Brilliant Rev. The plans of rats and she/men.Feb 15, 16:29
    • Hatey McHateface on For Mridul And Sandy: “I guess naming his/her online persona after the most famous female troll in popular fiction eventually became too much of…Feb 15, 16:27
    • Muscleguy on Bricked-up windows: “The police role should be pretty much over by now. So over to the COPFS. Remember Murrell is due in…Feb 15, 16:22
    • Eddie Munster on The thickness of blood: “I have a feeling any documents that are being purposely withheld, are very likely littered with slurs against Sandie. They…Feb 15, 16:21
    • Andy Anderson on Bricked-up windows: “We are unique. In 2014 the whole campaign against us ( apart from the failed 1100 plus promises) was that…Feb 15, 16:18
    • Dan on The thickness of blood: “I’ve completed a full browser cache clear and history deleted and it’s still auto-downloading. I delete the file and clear…Feb 15, 16:18
    • Hatey McHateface on The thickness of blood: “As the malware application is reputed to be one that allows unauthorised remote control of the computer, I naturally assumed…Feb 15, 16:17
    • gregor on The thickness of blood: “The Whingers here can’t even describe Scotland’s values. They are an utter embarrassment to Scotland.Feb 15, 16:17
    • gregor on The thickness of blood: “SO WHINGERS, WHERES IS IT re. SCOTLAND’S INDEPENDENCE ??? WHERE’S THE FU**ING PLAN… #DespicableWhingerFraudsFeb 15, 16:15
    • Insider on The thickness of blood: “You, and the “trans women” should be made to learn grammatical English and correct spelling perhaps ? p.s Are you…Feb 15, 16:15
    • twathater on The thickness of blood: “The greatest wee gay parliament in the world being shown up for what it is , a sex addled, deviant,pervert…Feb 15, 16:14
    • gregor on For Mridul And Sandy: “Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree: “The following tactics proved to be losers for the Democratic Party in 2024: 1. Lawfare 2. Inflammatory…Feb 15, 16:10
    • Hatey McHateface on The thickness of blood: ““44% of people in the UK now claiming to know a trans person” That stat is misleading unless correlated against…Feb 15, 16:08
    • Muscleguy on The thickness of blood: “Apparently Sandie Peggie declined to setyle with NHS Fife as she wants a declaratory judgement. She also needs that to…Feb 15, 16:04
    • yoon scum on The thickness of blood: “I would like to present a little sernario and I’d like you lot to consider it and to answer two…Feb 15, 16:03
    • gregor on The thickness of blood: “re. “There is many within the “independence” movement who are deeply uncomfortable with freedom of speech Just look at the…Feb 15, 15:59
    • gregor on For Mridul And Sandy: “The liberal elite strongly disagree (as usual:)Feb 15, 15:48
    • yoon scum on The thickness of blood: “Okay lets go into your world of chick don’t have dicks What is the answer? Should we ban anyone who…Feb 15, 15:44
    • gregor on For Mridul And Sandy: “Anonymous disagree. Ignore them, lolFeb 15, 15:42
    • yoon scum on The thickness of blood: “There is many within the “independence” movement who are deeply uncomfortable with freedom of speech Just look at the rage…Feb 15, 15:34
    • TheParty1sOver on The thickness of blood: “Chicks don’t have dicks. Women’s changing rooms are called women’s changing rooms for a reason.Feb 15, 15:32
    • Jim Thomson on The thickness of blood: “Seems clear of any malware nonsense.Feb 15, 15:30
    • gregor on The thickness of blood: “Freedom of speech does not apply to you lot.Feb 15, 15:28
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
164
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x