The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Dizzy heights

Posted on August 01, 2012 by

We expect next month’s Wings Over Scotland viewing figures to take a pretty big fall, as politics will still be on holiday and there won’t be any more stories about the Rangers saga to fill the gaping NewsChasm (tm) left by the summer “silly season”. So we hope you’ll allow us this toot on our stat-trumpet before the inevitable slide.

July saw yet another record-smashing month for the blog, piling almost 40,000 page views onto the previous high – a 17% increase – and boosting the number of unique visitors by an even more startling 27%, to just shy of 30,000. The running total of 986,764 pageviews since we started nine months ago means that in August we should at least be able to boast of breaking through the 1-million barrier well within our first year, which will be some small degree of consolation.

It’s traditional at this point to cough modestly and hopefully towards the “Donate” button – we’ve got just about enough cash from generous viewers now to get on with moving to a more robust server, under our “official” domain name that won’t see the blog blocked for some readers for having “game” in its address – but mostly we just wanted to say thanks once more to the people who are increasingly making Wings Over Scotland their first stop for Scottish political news with just slightly too much focus on football. We’ll try not to let you down.

10 to “Dizzy heights”

  1. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    For perspective, there were 54 posts in total over the month, of which 22 were chiefly about Rangers and 34 about our usual Scottish political issues, but despite being in the minority the Rangers-related posts took 16 of the top 20 spots, including 9 of the top 10.

    However, the month’s most-read post (“A Glebe Park Gallery”) provided fewer than 4% of the site’s total views, the lowest-ever percentage for a single post, suggesting (in conjunction with other stats) that a significant proportion of the people who came for the Rangers pieces were staying around to read other stuff.

    Remember, we’re not here to preach to the converted. Ultimately, anything that brings more viewers to the site for ANY reason puts more eyeballs on the political stories, and while that doesn’t mean we’re moving to porn and cat pictures any time soon, we unapologetically reserve the right to cover, and continue covering, subjects of indirect but real relevance to the independence campaign in order to increase the blog’s audience.

    If you think the balance has been tilted too far in that direction over recent weeks, get politicians to take shorter holidays.

    Reply
  2. mogabee says:

    Rev  You’ve got an irreverent, analytical and humerous take on all you write that is very enjoyable and refreshing.Even as a non fooball fan I’ve read all the “rangers” stuff! Many of the comments make me laugh and keep me coming back for more.
     
     Will certainly donate.

    Reply
  3. Bill C says:

    Thoroughly deserved, best political blog in Scotland by far.

    Reply
  4. McHaggis says:

    a refreshing alternative to the stomach churning bile and propaganda on other established news sites such as ‘The Scotsman’…

    I say ‘established’ only in the historical context. Clearly comparing their plummeting readership with blogs like your own, which are on the rise, must say something about both the future of newspapers in general and particularly those with such a vomit-inducing bias to Unionism and the Torys (blue and red Torys that is).

    I stopped buying The Scotsman years ago.
    I stopped contributing to their on-line ‘forum’ within the last 6 months or so
    After glancing at today’s top political and other ‘news’ stories I am on the cusp of never even going back to their on-line presence.

    If ever their was an example of a publication’s decline being entirely self-inflicted then surely The Scotsman is it.

    Reply
  5. Doug Daniel says:

    For more perspective, here are the circulation figures for the daily newspapers in Scotland from November last year.
    The Scottish Sun – 314,822
    Daily Record – 267,075
    Scottish Daily Mail – 108,047
    Scottish Daily Express – 63,601
    Daily Star of Scotland – 63,241
    The Herald – 45,646
    The Scotsman – 38,289
    Daily Mirror – 22,805
    Daily Telegraph – 20,416
    The Times – 19,042
    The Guardian – 12,936
    Independent – 7,276
    Financial Times – 3,461

    So your unique visitors tally exceeds the circulation figures of all the non-Scottish “quality” papers, and even the Daily Mirror. Probably not too long until you surpass the Scotsman’s figures too.
     

    Reply
  6. John Lyons says:

    I agree with Mogabee, it’s the perfect balance of ireverence and humour that has me coming back everyday, but it’s also the detailed knoweldge, particularly in issues which are deliberately obfuscated and complicated, like Rangers finances. You seem to be able to cut through the crap and get to the point.

    Well done.

    And keep the football in there. I think I have seen a Celtic supporters for independence page on Facebook (to go with the Labour Lib Dem and Tory ones!) Not seen a Rangers one yet, but as long as that Celtic one exists I suppose it’s relevant to talk about football on a political blog (And vice vrsa!)

    Reply
  7. cynicalHighlander says:

    #John Lyons
    link to facebook.com
    2012 germination seems to be on the up, might be the rain.

    Reply
  8. annie says:

    just want to add my “well done” i’ve been hooked for ages

    Reply
  9. Morag says:

    To be honest, I was irritated by all the football stuff, and wished it wasn’t there.  But then RevStu pointed out the traffic it was bringing to the blog, and I capitulated entirely.  But the other upside is that I read enough of it to begin to have a glimmering of an idea what it was all about, and to understand what BBC Scotland and the Herald were on about.  I wouldn’t have read it at all if the presentation hadn’t been so amusing.
     
    Roll on the new server.  I do worry a bit if our IT guys will see that “gamer” thing, and come after me.  I hope all these Twitter links don’t make it look as if I’m on Twitter – I don’t Tweet at all, I never read it and I don’t even have a Twitter account.

    Reply
  10. Seasick Dave says:

    Well done Rev!

    If you get enough in the way of donations, you may want to pay Jimbo a wee retainer.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,984 Posts, 1,252,095 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Southernbystander on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Once you become a professor in this country you become middle class whether you were before or not. Alf suggests…” Oct 2, 10:30
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Yep, I reckon Messrs. Fanon and Césaire were early pioneers of Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V.” Oct 2, 10:18
    • Craig P on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Was a Labour MSP, Colin Smyth.” Oct 2, 09:50
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Alf doesn’t have any of his own opinions, he just uses the quotes of others. That Masters or PhD must’ve…” Oct 2, 09:45
    • sam on In The Eyes Of The Law: “The police would have to pay attention to the findings of the court in considering what fresh evidence there might…” Oct 2, 09:42
    • Cynicus on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I doubt if Mr Murrell is a trustee of the fund.” Oct 2, 09:32
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “So have you donated or not, Alf? Or are you rudely derailing ANOTHER thread with your garbage?” Oct 2, 09:18
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: ““Not every day I get to pish 600 thousand up the wall”” Oct 2, 08:59
    • 100%Yes on In The Eyes Of The Law: “The fighting pot mounting up quite nicely. The SNP needs stopping and removing how anyone can talk about working for…” Oct 2, 08:44
    • Vestas on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Done. Put a few quid extra in as I have a horrible feeling I still owe you from the Kezia…” Oct 2, 08:19
    • Northcode on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Just to add one point of clarification: when a decision is sent back for lawful reconsideration, the court doesn’t direct…” Oct 2, 08:09
    • Northcode on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Yes, the court can say the original process was unlawful and require it to be done again properly — which…” Oct 2, 07:56
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Which group, oppressor or oppressed, does Fanon put Professors into?” Oct 2, 07:55
    • Minceheid on In The Eyes Of The Law: “That reminds me – who was that SNP guy that got busted for hiding a camera in the bogs or…” Oct 2, 07:18
    • sam on In The Eyes Of The Law: “You are wrong on this as well. The Court can find the decision unlawful and order a reconsideration. It can…” Oct 2, 07:11
    • sam on In The Eyes Of The Law: ““check procedure and not much else.” A judicial review of Police Scotland’s decisions might be brought on grounds that the…” Oct 2, 07:06
    • John McNab on In The Eyes Of The Law: ““This changing room’s lying empty.”” Oct 2, 06:38
    • Elmac on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Contribution made and more if required. We need justice to hold these lying corrupt sleazebags to account. If the prosecution…” Oct 1, 23:31
    • MarkerPost on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Donated. Hope the fund is ring-fenced…” Oct 1, 23:17
    • James on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““….they smelt of pubs…. and Wormwood scrubs…. …and too many right wing meetings….” What a shower of unionist twats….” Oct 1, 22:24
    • Jamie on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I have donated. Good luck to you.” Oct 1, 22:17
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Donated Stu.” Oct 1, 21:05
    • Alf Baird on In The Eyes Of The Law: “As Fanon wrote, in a colonial society “The national middle class discovers its historic mission: that of intermediary”, between who…” Oct 1, 20:48
    • crisiscult on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Don’t post much, not on Twitter/X anymore (nothing to do with Musk, just find it unusable these days), but always…” Oct 1, 20:44
    • Northcode on In The Eyes Of The Law: “My understanding is that Justice Reviews are really narrow — they don’t look at the underlying merits or reopen investigations,…” Oct 1, 19:36
    • Heaver on In The Eyes Of The Law: “£100 donated. Just ask if you need more. You might not get, because I may not have, but no harm…” Oct 1, 18:31
    • McDuff on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Done. Go get them rev.” Oct 1, 17:21
    • 100%Yes on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Reading the comments I’ve noticed unionist donating as well. This isn’t about what side of the political argument your own…” Oct 1, 17:01
    • 100%Yes on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Donated a tenner but as time goes on I’ll donate more as and when needed. I actually believe this is…” Oct 1, 16:50
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Caption competition. “Naw, ah didnae pish oan yer new trainers. Ye did it yersel.” “How’s he *that* big, min?” “Couple…” Oct 1, 16:04
  • A tall tale



↑ Top