The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Dizzy heights

Posted on August 01, 2012 by

We expect next month’s Wings Over Scotland viewing figures to take a pretty big fall, as politics will still be on holiday and there won’t be any more stories about the Rangers saga to fill the gaping NewsChasm (tm) left by the summer “silly season”. So we hope you’ll allow us this toot on our stat-trumpet before the inevitable slide.

July saw yet another record-smashing month for the blog, piling almost 40,000 page views onto the previous high – a 17% increase – and boosting the number of unique visitors by an even more startling 27%, to just shy of 30,000. The running total of 986,764 pageviews since we started nine months ago means that in August we should at least be able to boast of breaking through the 1-million barrier well within our first year, which will be some small degree of consolation.

It’s traditional at this point to cough modestly and hopefully towards the “Donate” button – we’ve got just about enough cash from generous viewers now to get on with moving to a more robust server, under our “official” domain name that won’t see the blog blocked for some readers for having “game” in its address – but mostly we just wanted to say thanks once more to the people who are increasingly making Wings Over Scotland their first stop for Scottish political news with just slightly too much focus on football. We’ll try not to let you down.

10 to “Dizzy heights”

  1. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    For perspective, there were 54 posts in total over the month, of which 22 were chiefly about Rangers and 34 about our usual Scottish political issues, but despite being in the minority the Rangers-related posts took 16 of the top 20 spots, including 9 of the top 10.

    However, the month’s most-read post (“A Glebe Park Gallery”) provided fewer than 4% of the site’s total views, the lowest-ever percentage for a single post, suggesting (in conjunction with other stats) that a significant proportion of the people who came for the Rangers pieces were staying around to read other stuff.

    Remember, we’re not here to preach to the converted. Ultimately, anything that brings more viewers to the site for ANY reason puts more eyeballs on the political stories, and while that doesn’t mean we’re moving to porn and cat pictures any time soon, we unapologetically reserve the right to cover, and continue covering, subjects of indirect but real relevance to the independence campaign in order to increase the blog’s audience.

    If you think the balance has been tilted too far in that direction over recent weeks, get politicians to take shorter holidays.

    Reply
  2. mogabee says:

    Rev  You’ve got an irreverent, analytical and humerous take on all you write that is very enjoyable and refreshing.Even as a non fooball fan I’ve read all the “rangers” stuff! Many of the comments make me laugh and keep me coming back for more.
     
     Will certainly donate.

    Reply
  3. Bill C says:

    Thoroughly deserved, best political blog in Scotland by far.

    Reply
  4. McHaggis says:

    a refreshing alternative to the stomach churning bile and propaganda on other established news sites such as ‘The Scotsman’…

    I say ‘established’ only in the historical context. Clearly comparing their plummeting readership with blogs like your own, which are on the rise, must say something about both the future of newspapers in general and particularly those with such a vomit-inducing bias to Unionism and the Torys (blue and red Torys that is).

    I stopped buying The Scotsman years ago.
    I stopped contributing to their on-line ‘forum’ within the last 6 months or so
    After glancing at today’s top political and other ‘news’ stories I am on the cusp of never even going back to their on-line presence.

    If ever their was an example of a publication’s decline being entirely self-inflicted then surely The Scotsman is it.

    Reply
  5. Doug Daniel says:

    For more perspective, here are the circulation figures for the daily newspapers in Scotland from November last year.
    The Scottish Sun – 314,822
    Daily Record – 267,075
    Scottish Daily Mail – 108,047
    Scottish Daily Express – 63,601
    Daily Star of Scotland – 63,241
    The Herald – 45,646
    The Scotsman – 38,289
    Daily Mirror – 22,805
    Daily Telegraph – 20,416
    The Times – 19,042
    The Guardian – 12,936
    Independent – 7,276
    Financial Times – 3,461

    So your unique visitors tally exceeds the circulation figures of all the non-Scottish “quality” papers, and even the Daily Mirror. Probably not too long until you surpass the Scotsman’s figures too.
     

    Reply
  6. John Lyons says:

    I agree with Mogabee, it’s the perfect balance of ireverence and humour that has me coming back everyday, but it’s also the detailed knoweldge, particularly in issues which are deliberately obfuscated and complicated, like Rangers finances. You seem to be able to cut through the crap and get to the point.

    Well done.

    And keep the football in there. I think I have seen a Celtic supporters for independence page on Facebook (to go with the Labour Lib Dem and Tory ones!) Not seen a Rangers one yet, but as long as that Celtic one exists I suppose it’s relevant to talk about football on a political blog (And vice vrsa!)

    Reply
  7. cynicalHighlander says:

    #John Lyons
    link to facebook.com
    2012 germination seems to be on the up, might be the rain.

    Reply
  8. annie says:

    just want to add my “well done” i’ve been hooked for ages

    Reply
  9. Morag says:

    To be honest, I was irritated by all the football stuff, and wished it wasn’t there.  But then RevStu pointed out the traffic it was bringing to the blog, and I capitulated entirely.  But the other upside is that I read enough of it to begin to have a glimmering of an idea what it was all about, and to understand what BBC Scotland and the Herald were on about.  I wouldn’t have read it at all if the presentation hadn’t been so amusing.
     
    Roll on the new server.  I do worry a bit if our IT guys will see that “gamer” thing, and come after me.  I hope all these Twitter links don’t make it look as if I’m on Twitter – I don’t Tweet at all, I never read it and I don’t even have a Twitter account.

    Reply
  10. Seasick Dave says:

    Well done Rev!

    If you get enough in the way of donations, you may want to pay Jimbo a wee retainer.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,252,942 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: ““the only real path to independence is democratic legitimacy” There is no democracy possible for a people whose territory has…” Oct 22, 10:12
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “I watched Professor Alf Baird’s speech on territorial alienation at the recent SSRG Conference. He makes some valid sociological points,…” Oct 22, 09:45
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “He gets on tae the laptop when his maw gangs oot. I guess she has no alternative to leaving him…” Oct 22, 09:42
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “The SNP pretending it is Sovereign In Scotland regarding laws to do as it pleases is a laugh, whilst it…” Oct 22, 09:41
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Dan, I’ve worked on vehicles with electric handbrakes from 2 manufacturers, Vauxhall and VAG. In both cases, the calliper motor…” Oct 22, 09:27
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “He’s learnt how to copy and paste and now he thinks a letter is on its way from Mensa. Generally…” Oct 22, 09:04
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: ““Regularly seeing cars in an aquaintence’s scrap yard at 10 years old now when a vehicle used to make 20…” Oct 22, 09:02
    • Willie on Faces In Sand: “It’s not a matter of the Scottish Government just saying that they’ve written to the health boards to ‘ reinforce…” Oct 22, 08:16
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “SANDIE PEGGIE URGES NHS SCOT TO ENFORCE SINGLE-SEX SPACES Nurse Sandie Peggie has urged NHS Scotland to follow NHS England…” Oct 21, 23:37
    • Insider on Faces In Sand: “Pished again, fatso ?” Oct 21, 23:02
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “One ponders where Robin thinks the jet fuel for his foreign holidays comes from if he is such a fan…” Oct 21, 22:55
    • James on Faces In Sand: ““…Poor fuckwit main, even when he tries to “be clever” he just makes a fool of himself….” “….on a Scottish…” Oct 21, 22:12
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Thanks for the link, Fearghas.” Oct 21, 22:06
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““We do not protest, challenge or contest any action taken by WM” Ah, c’moan noo, Lorncal, you’re ignoring the tea…” Oct 21, 19:53
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Seemingly I’m here 24/7, Chas. Geri is only just back. If she went private for her treatment, I hope she…” Oct 21, 19:43
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Aw, partan, I didn’t ken ye cared. You’ll have been expecting this one and all. And yes, conscientious objectors do…” Oct 21, 19:28
    • Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “That dippy wifie is apparently Hannah Mary Goodlad, the MSP for Shetland. Here’s a link to her speech, should you…” Oct 21, 19:14
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Hook, line, sinker. Knew you wouldn’t resist. Imagine being so sad as to be hanging about all day posting comments.…” Oct 21, 18:49
    • Chas on Faces In Sand: “I think it has been 4 or 5 weeks since I last visited the comments section on Wings. After all,…” Oct 21, 18:41
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “FFS Spartan. You said you were done. Why can’t you keep your word, you being so self-identified morally superior?” Oct 21, 18:33
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “Available on ‘IndyScotNews’ site: www.youtube.com/@indyscotnews” Oct 21, 18:25
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “Oh, I have nothing but contempt for the Communist dictatorship that cooked it up, be assured of that. Our “leaders”,…” Oct 21, 18:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Nah. He’s just wanting the wealth fund to be banked in Sovereigns. Makes a lot of sense actually, price of…” Oct 21, 18:10
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Careful, Aidan. The servants of the Nephilim may have been summoned to this thread.” Oct 21, 18:07
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “C’moan noo, MH. Within a small number of years of being Independent, we’ll be rich beyond the wildest dreams of…” Oct 21, 18:02
    • James on Faces In Sand: “Where did they find you?” Oct 21, 17:02
    • Onlooker on Faces In Sand: “Who’s the idiot looking smug and pleased with herself as she babbles on about the name of Scotland being the…” Oct 21, 16:49
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “Does it not dawn on you, Geri, that it IS possible to have a legitimate concern for, and indeed “a…” Oct 21, 16:26
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “So, James Che, no Scottish Commissioners, no Scottish Jurists drafting the Scottish Treaty, no Queen Anne as titular head of…” Oct 21, 16:23
    • sarah on Faces In Sand: “Facts about: 1. the economic drain from Scotland because of the “Union”; 2. the legal proof that the “Union” is…” Oct 21, 16:07
  • A tall tale



↑ Top