The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


A kind of freedom

Posted on April 15, 2025 by

Alert readers will have noticed our so-far-fruitless attempts to extract information from the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator regarding the disturbing activities of the controversy-plagued LGBT Youth Scotland.

We are far from the only people raising concerns about the charity – we know of at least 17 separate formal complaints against LGBTYS in the past year alone, yet the OSCR has declined to open any sort of formal inquiry into them. (It carried out three such inquiries in 2024.)

But despite the OSCR’s assertion that “we strive to be transparent and accountable”, when we went to find those complaints (including, of course, the one from ourselves) to link you to them, we hit a brick wall that rapidly turned into a whole new concern.

The OSCR has a Freedom Of Information page, but it contains no links to either the FOI requests it has received or its responses.

It does however state that the OSCR has adopted the Model Publication Scheme produced by the Scottish Information Commissioner, which it helpfully links to.

The first clause of the Model Publication Scheme is this:

And a few lines later it makes very clear what it means by “publish”.

In other words, that you should be able to find FOI responses on the OSCR’s website without having to email them and ask.

So we went back to the OSCR’s FOI page and clicked the link on “our FOISA policy”. It links to a document which includes a paragraph on “Our Publication Scheme”.

That points to the OSCR’s “Guide To Information”, which is a dead link. (Something of a speciality of the OSCR website, as we know.)

However, if you go back to the main Freedom Of Information page, there’s a working link to the information guide.

The guide states again that the OSCR is signed up to the Model Publication Scheme, and notes that the published information is available “on our website”, without stipulating where.

The document contains a total of 51 links, including to the OSCR’s Equalities Strategy and guidance on how charities can safely support Ukraine (which redirects to a page saying “We’re sorry, this page no longer exists”), but nothing about anywhere you can read FOI requests and responses.

The closest it appears to get is the section headed “Communications”, which simply links back to the main Freedom Of Information page.

And round and round you go in circles, without ever getting the information you want. Which just isn’t good enough, folks. So we’ve asked for an explanation, but since we already know how that goes with the OSCR, we’ve also gone straight to the Information Commissioner to alert them to the OSCR’s clear non-compliance with the Model Publication Scheme.

To: enquiries@foi.scot

I note with some concern that it appears to be impossible to locate responses to FOI requests anywhere on the website of the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR). Their “Guide To Information”, located here, makes no reference to where responses are published.

The “Publication” section of their FOISA Policy, located here, merely directs readers to the aforementioned Guide To Information, which is of no assistance, and their Freedom Of Information page, located here, does not include any link to where responses are published.

It does however claim that they adopt the Scottish Information Commissioner’s “Model Publication Scheme” with regard to FOIs. That scheme, which as you know is published here, stipulates in its first clause that:

“1. The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) requires Scottish public authorities to adopt and maintain a publication scheme. Authorities are under a legal obligation to:

(i) publish the classes of information that they make routinely available

(ii) tell the public how to access the information they publish and whether information is available free of charge or on payment.”

(It notes that the definition of “publish” is that the information must be “available to anyone to access easily without having to make a request for it”.)

The OSCR therefore appears to fall at the first hurdle, since as far as I can establish it does not tell the public how to access the information it publishes with regard to FOI requests at all, let alone “easily”. I consider myself a reasonably diligent and competent professional journalist and I’ve been trying to locate said information for an entire morning without success, merely being sent round and round in circles to pages which do not contain or link to it.

I am keen to hear the Information Commissioner’s view on this matter.

Hopefully the SIC will be more helpful and competent than the OSCR is.

0 to “A kind of freedom”

  1. Gav says:

    Excellent sleuthing Stu

    Reply
  2. MaryB says:

    Who is responsible for OSCR? Who do they answer to? Who has oversight?
    Surely there is a minister in the Scottish Parliament who is responsible for it?
    The answer(s) to these questions could be quite revealing.

    Reply
  3. Anton Decadent says:

    A cliche, I know, but keep up the good work.

    Reply
  4. MaryB says:

    The current non-executive director is a former yoga teacher who’s been on the public sector board merry-go-round. Part of the quangocracy.

    Reply
  5. Frank Gillougley says:

    Really, Stu, you are a star.

    But what on earth did you think that the civil service do all day long, other than construe labyrinthine legalese concerning how to protect, obscure and cover up their tracks and those of other government organisations on the same payroll?

    Government sinecures are a major growth industry now especially since the rise of IT which equates to a whole new generation of toilet monitors, but there’s nothing here to really bother your silly little head with. They know best. Now be a good boy and eat up your cereal. There’s a good lad.

    All bureaucracies are self-serving. End of.

    Reply
  6. David Hannah says:

    Lock these beasts up. Get them to fuck out of Scottish public life.

    Reply
  7. gregor says:

    I did a FOI request to the Care Inspectorateand got a similar response today.

    Reply
  8. Hatey McHateface says:

    “the Scottish Information Commissioner” (SIC).

    Very droll 🙂

    No doubt no pun was intended, but seriously, was there nobody in the room capable of thinking that one through?

    Reply
  9. twathater says:

    There appears to be numerous statements that the information MUST adhere to legal parameters BY LAW, the question has to be who is overseeing and REGULATING the various nonentity government departments to ensure they are complying with the law (surely that would be the Scottish Information Commissioner) which then begs the question are they deliberately ignoring these flagrant breaches of the law or has no one reported the various government departments engaging in these duplicitous illegal actions

    Reply
  10. Mark Beggan says:

    Fantasy or Reality?

    Scottish children are in Danger from LGBTQ.

    The LGBT brigade are after Scottish children because there is no chance of a future LGBT generation coming up behind to take their place. The big plan being lets brainwash boys and girls into “it’s” to Secure the Queer future. The lesbian adoption experiment in Scotland is up to it’s neck in blood. So they changed tactics.

    If this is the reason behind the criminal activity of the LGBTQ gang then the whole Scottish government,legal system is facing charges of conspiracy and collusion.

    Reply
  11. McDuff says:

    This madness is prospering at the expense of our children and you have to wonder at the silence of the MSM and that of parents.
    Thank God for the rev.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,852 Posts, 1,232,280 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • twathater on How Far To Go, How Far: “The fact that this supposed learned professional is receiving such criticism from his fellow legal professionals indicates that they can…Dec 13, 04:26
    • Cynicus on How Far To Go, How Far: “Great work again, Geoff. I highlight the points below from the journey your link led me: 1) Anya Palmer, a…Dec 13, 03:34
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Dan, I hear you, though obviously the ginger news is not read by myself, but the (war) word is fast…Dec 13, 00:08
    • Alastair Ewen on How Far To Go, How Far: “Is Judge Kemp a heavy drinker??Dec 13, 00:07
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “I will keep eye on war news to check wether propaganda or true over next few weeks, The tribunal judge…Dec 12, 23:56
    • Lorncal on How Far To Go, How Far: “So, in order to let these men have everything their own way, we have to trample on women? That is…Dec 12, 23:43
    • Lorncal on How Far To Go, How Far: “Yet, even ECHR agrees that men should not be in women’s spaces.Dec 12, 23:30
    • GM on How Far To Go, How Far: “He’s a man.Dec 12, 23:30
    • Lorncal on How Far To Go, How Far: “Of course they do, Mark. That is not the point that Michael was making. The use of the words, hierarchy…Dec 12, 23:27
    • Lorncal on How Far To Go, How Far: “Yes, AI does make mistakes, but all on one side? Methinks human intervention here.Dec 12, 23:17
    • David McAdam on How Far To Go, How Far: “So the DG had to resign from the BBC when a programme was found to have “edited” a speech of…Dec 12, 23:07
    • Geoff Anderson on How Far To Go, How Far: “Archived Times article https://archive.is/MyuviDec 12, 21:39
    • Kate L on How Far To Go, How Far: “Much like the male judge Alexander Kemp I suppose you find women’s safety and dignity acceptable sacrifices to make on…Dec 12, 21:37
    • Captain Caveman on Strike One: “Meh! Awesome Northy you made me laugh. Touche! 🙂Dec 12, 21:18
    • DavidT on How Far To Go, How Far: “I have no personal stake in this matter, nor am I aware of any transgender individuals. However, Graham Linehan and…Dec 12, 20:48
    • Dan on How Far To Go, How Far: “But James, according to polling in the recent Ginger Stepchild article; Only about 5% of Scots rate Defence and Security…Dec 12, 20:33
    • Geoff Anderson on How Far To Go, How Far: ““Wouldn’t it be so much easier if we just did what the TransCult wanted” That is what the Judge concluded.Dec 12, 20:31
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “And breathe,,….Dec 12, 20:15
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “‘Keep Rabies out of Britain’ Springs to mind, forgot about that one. What with all the other dangerous things coming…Dec 12, 20:10
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Britain and France preparing for war, we have to wait and see whom the enemy is, but France informing its…Dec 12, 20:05
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Public matters and private rights are entirely different laws in Scotland.Dec 12, 19:55
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Tribunals in Scotland are funded by a consolidated fund by the Scottish governmentDec 12, 19:49
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Private Rights of biological Women to have private spaces regardless, is matter of Internal Scots law in Article XV111 and…Dec 12, 19:39
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “It’s lower in saturated fat, sure, but for Mammie’s authentic home baking, it has to be butter.Dec 12, 19:29
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “He iis quite an interesting site on legal matters. There are a few other Barristers that I follow for points…Dec 12, 19:29
    • Hatey McHateface on How Far To Go, How Far: “Could be rabies. The precautionary principle says put them down.Dec 12, 19:24
    • James Cheyne on How Far To Go, How Far: “Stu, I presume you watch BlackBeltBarrister as he states more or less the same as you. If not then he…Dec 12, 19:19
    • Mark Beggan on How Far To Go, How Far: “The politically correct voice of the chattering class is foaming at the mouth!Dec 12, 19:09
    • Hatey McHateface on Strike One: “Channeling your inner hatstand there, Northy.Dec 12, 18:58
    • Northcode on Strike One: ““Good idea, Northy…” Yes. I thought so, too. Hey! Didn’t I just dismiss you from this place? Begone, rascal -…Dec 12, 18:54
  • A tall tale



↑ Top