The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Turning a blind eye

Posted on July 24, 2012 by

As we’ve said before, we really don’t see much point in getting worked up about opinion polls when we’re still more than two years out from any public vote on anything.  A new poll by Panelbase has some fairly standard results – the SNP well in front in Holyrood voting intentions (up 2% overall on the 2011 result, with Labour and the Greens both up 1%, and the Tories and Lib Dems down 1.5% each), independence trailing by 9% in a two-way vote with 20% undecided, and the three options (including greater devolution) neck-and-neck when set directly against each other (independence 30, devo-X 29, status quo 28).

While we’re encouraged by these numbers at the height of the Great 2012 Festival Of Britishness, they essentially mean nothing at this point, and don’t tell us anything we haven’t known for months or years already. But what IS mildly interesting is seeing how the Scottish print and online media handles them.

The poll was conducted for the Sunday Times, and presumably appeared in it. (Not being website subscribers we don’t know, and by the time we discovered the poll’s existence it was Monday and too late to go out and buy the real paper.) Better Nation was first off the mark to report it, slightly oddly focusing on the pretty rational seat projections the SNP attached to the figures and crowbarring in a sour, gratuitous and misleading dig at the Scottish Government over the equal-marriage consultation.

(Slightly startlingly, we were actually allowed to post comments pointing that out.)

Scot Goes Pop!, meanwhile, highlighted the continuing gulf in support for independence between men and women, which enabled it to spin with the headline “Majority of men support independence”. The Herald took a similar angle in its coverage, choosing instead the more neutral but slightly curious description “Female vote key to the Union”. (Curious because strictly speaking we’re having a vote on independence, not the Union.)

The paper also ran an interesting analysis on the subject, oddly penned by its Literary Editor rather than a political columnist, which had the rather slanted title of “It’s a good job women are so cautious” but in fact contained a rather more thoughtful assessment in the actual copy, concluding that women aren’t so much opposed to independence as waiting to be convinced by arguments aimed more at an emotional response than an economic one.

As for the rest of the Scottish media and blogosphere, the most telling aspect of their reporting of the poll was that there wasn’t any. Read the Scotsman, the Record or any of the UK broadsheets and blacktops and you’d never know the survey had taken place, unlike recent polls showing lower support for independence which have been front-page splashes all over the Unionist press. We can only assume all their political correspondents are off on their summer holidays. Yes, that must be it.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
R.Louis

Surely the BBC on pathetic quay will have covered it, no??

ronald alexander mcdonald

Bang on the money Stuart. For what there worth the polls are looking ok, considering the vote will be in 2 years time. If a week is a long time in politics et al?

To me it demonstrates the degree of panic within the Unionist camp, considering their media puppets will not report the full picture. Coupled with their willingness to participate in blatant scaremongering, means the Union is as good as dead.

Campbells and McDonalds united! How can we lose?         

fitheach

“Campbells and McDonalds united! How can we lose?”
What? Tins of soup in a burger chain!

@Rev Stu
“blacktops”
Is that an official term or did you just make that up?
All the opinion polls that are published have as much validity as the ones conducted by cat food manufacturers which begin “9 out of ten owners who expressed a preference…”. Polls which include the Devo(.*) option are particularly suspect as that option looks increasingly likely never to appear in the referendum. Including the Devo(.*) option seems to be the refuge of the Unionist as it makes their postion look more popular. Make it a clear choice between independence and no change and things wouldn’t look so rosy for the Unionists.

John Lyons

These polls don’t mean anything two years ahead of the vote, but they will be used by politicians to see which route their campaigns may take.

On the one hand I see the YES campaign saying to the undecided and the Devo anything supporters “These Unionists have demanded there is no second question. The only way to get more powers for Scotland, the additional powers you want is to vote YES”
The Unionists should be saying. “You can’t have a devo option on the referendum. We know you want more powers for Scotland, but not full independence so vote agaist independence which is one way of getting more powers and we’ll think about giving you some. Maybe.”

The second is a much harder sell and the Yes campaign should find it much easier to attract support from those in the middle ground.

That might lead to the Unionists allowing a second question and hoping to defeat full independence and then drag out the process of delivering the additonal powers.
That’s worst case scenario for me.

I simply can’t see a straight question ending in a no victory.

I can see maybe a three way question ending in a no win, which would be a nightmare, or a Devo win, which would then take decades to drag additional powers out of Westminster and leave us in an uncertain limbo which could be even worse than a straight no.
After a straight no, we would wait twenty or thirty years and try again. Under a no with Devo, every time the Scots get a little bit rebellious Westminster will produce another Scotland bill, promising more powers, turn it on it’s head, lose it in the Lords for two years, Let Michael Forsyth Pee all over it, and eventually give us something way less than first promised and expect us to be quiet for another fifteen years or so. And they could probably keep that up indefinately, or at least until the oil runs out.

Nightmare.

John Lyons

LOL.

British tabloids provide their readers a heady concoction of gossip, entertainment and news.

Nice how news is bottom of the agenda….

Reminds me of David Cameron, what was he said about the referendum “Legal, binding and fair.” Struck me at the time that fairness was last on his agenda.

fitheach

 
Rev. Stuart Campbell says:
“blacktops”
link to buzzle.com

You just “Googled” that one 😉
I will add that to my lexicon. All I need now is a replacement collective term for “broadsheet” as it doesn’t seem appropriate anymore.

Peninsula

I posted a comment in the Herald regarding the Scottish media ignoring the Panel Base/Sunday Times survey.I contrasted this with the blanket coverage of the Ipsos mori poll a few days ago.I also posted a breakdown of the poll.

As I expected it never got published.The Herald are getting worse and worse at this. 

They appear to give the aggressive rantings and ravings of a certain M Mckeown free reign, but not allow valid comments about opinion polls and the media.

I’v also challenged Mckeown’s comments and more often than not, they never appear.

Adam Davidson

Challange the Herald on it. I had a similar problem, emailed them, although it took a couple of try’s, and got a call from someone who sorted it out.

Appleby

It’ll be very interesting to see how things change once the current insane British Media Blitz winds down to a dribble. 2013 should be a good political battle ground and 2014 should see things swing around to the Yes camp on advantages. It’s 2013-14 is when the polls will get more interesting.

Morag

Adam, how did you get it sorted out?
 
I’ve given up even reading the Herald comments, because I know any foam-flecked rants under the name McKeown will be published, and anything I post maybe 50/50, who knows.  And I don’t post unless I have something of substance to say.
 
How do you sort that out?  Keep copies of the posts?  Hassle them for an explanation of why they don’t appear?  I would have doubted that it would have been worth the effort.  What line did you take with them?

Peninsula

To Morag & Adam

It seems the Herald mods have come to their senses, my comment referred to above has now been published, about 8 hours after I wrote it!

Morag – I actually wrote a post specifically for the Herald mods this afternoon.

 In short I said there was talk on the blogosphere about their moderating policy, and specifiically mentioned that Mckeown seems to get away with writing lots of inflammatory rubbish, but if you challenged it, you’d often find your response wasn’t published.

Then this evening I found my Panelbase/Sunday Times poll comment was up.

Probably just a coincidence, but they’re ya go.
 

douglas clark

morag et al,
 
I am curious why McKeown (West Midlands) appears to write on near enough every Herald politics thread. I’ll stand corrected, but he rarely, if ever, has the dreaded ‘edited by a moderator’ comment against his name. Who exactly is this guy? Enquiring minds in Auchtermuchty demand to know!

Morag

My feelings also.  I have also, now and again, written posts I suspected might not see the light of day, but for the satisfaction of knowing that at least the moderators would have to read them.  I’m not aware of this having any effect.
 
I also would love to know who this guy is.  I know posters on NNS have suggested he is actually a Herald plant, put there either just for the purpose of stirring the pot, or specifically to belittle the independence movement.  I really don’t know what to think.  I do know he seems to be absolute teflon.  Never seen a post edited, and some have contained much more inflammatory comments than posts of mine which have been edited.  Of course we can’t know if he has posts rejected, but he has so many accepted that I can’t imagine there would be many.
 
I also note that he seems to sit there in the early hours, waiting to get the first barbed, nasty, negative comment in right under the article.  One morning I actually noticed the timing of his post (after a while this becomes obscured, as it’s just noted as so many days ago) and commented about this habit.  My comment wasn’t posted.  One has to wonder about someone in England behaving quite so obsessively on the web site of a Scottish newspaper.  Wouldn’t he be happier cheerleading Severin Carrell in the Grauniad?
 
Decades ago, when I wrote to the Herald, they published my letters unedited.  Always.  More recently, they have been edited in ways to slant my meaning, and apply an obvious editorial bias.  This annoys me, so I stopped writing.  I thought the web comments might be an acceptable alternative, because surely web comments that were literate and non-abusive would not be edited to apply an editorial bias?  But that is exactly what is happening.  Unless you’re McKeown, when any bile you feel like spewing will be faithfully reproduced, it seems.
 
I seldom go to the Herald web site now.  McKeown annoys me too much, and I know I won’t be accorded the right of free reply to him.  I still buy the actual paper, but I wonder for how much longer.  I read the letters page nowadays, and I think, but what did these people actually write?  I don’t know.
 
It’s pernicious, and I wish they would rediscover the honesty I think they had in the 1970s.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,678 Posts, 1,205,059 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • twathater on Keeping the fire burning: “I’d donate tae that Ian and we could advertise it on air b&b with only mad Jock parties acceptableDec 14, 03:55
    • twathater on Keeping the fire burning: “Who the fuck do you think you are trying to demean someone because of their financial situation, the Rev has…Dec 14, 03:46
    • sarah on Keeping the fire burning: “Gove, of all people, doing the right thing. Isn’t it hate speech to say a GRC holder is still what…Dec 13, 22:08
    • Ian Brotherhood on Keeping the fire burning: “Here’s another worthy fundraiser… Why don’t we Scots raise enough to buy a big house in one of England’s ‘loveliest…Dec 13, 21:57
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Keeping the fire burning: “A ‘CHILLING ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH BY MEDIA REGULATOR IPSO    « The Spectator has defended the freedom of speech of…Dec 13, 21:37
    • Geri on The Wage Thief: “Besides not being indy yer not even Scottish. An interloper from over the border no doubt. It’s very simple to…Dec 13, 21:18
    • Southernbystander on Keeping the fire burning: “I like the Co-op tortilla chips. If slumming it I go for the cheese puffs or onion rings.Dec 13, 21:04
    • Southernbystander on Keeping the fire burning: “For the fact this site has provided me with many interesting insights, a few quid donated.Dec 13, 20:23
    • Geri on The Wage Thief: “Sorry, replied to the wrong post lol. Reposted.Dec 13, 19:48
    • Geri on The Wage Thief: “Cunty MY TAXES MacCuntface cheered on three of the biggest cons going that Thatcher peddled. Capitalism, colonialism & warmongering. Three…Dec 13, 19:45
    • Geri on The Wage Thief: “They need their mitts on all that rare mineral wealth to prop up their empire but things aren’t exactly going…Dec 13, 19:13
    • twathater on The Wage Thief: “Just think Cunty MacCuntface you and yer pals including the franchise fanny (the heid white flighter) encouraged and promoted the…Dec 13, 18:50
    • Jay on The Wage Thief: “Should one assume that you know about that excruciating experience? Your obsessions (Krafft Ebing style) are difficult to explain.Dec 13, 18:41
    • Geri on The Wage Thief: “You aren’t indy so piss off with yer pish. Colonisers aren’t in the business of granting independence. We see that…Dec 13, 18:34
    • sarah on Keeping the fire burning: “There’s always the Donate button – you can donate by debit card. I did it that way being antediluvian. :…Dec 13, 18:29
    • twathater on The Wage Thief: “Aye Geri what a state Los Angeles and other famous landmarks are in with the homeless and poverty spiralling, but…Dec 13, 18:21
    • Muscleguy on Keeping the fire burning: “I can’t subscribe on twitter since you have blocked me.Dec 13, 18:11
    • Geri on The Wage Thief: “More propaganda shit. I’ll tell you what boggles my mind. Fuckwits cheering on the most corrupt neo nhazi regime in…Dec 13, 18:04
    • gregor on The Wage Thief: “You’re too kind (blushing)… Greatness: “The quality or state of being important, notable, or distinguished.”: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/greatness Wonderful: “Excellent; great; marvelous.”…Dec 13, 17:57
    • gregor on The Wage Thief: “Stop hiding and step into the public ring you spineless sissies, otherwise we’ll continue holding the Forever-Champions Cup – And…Dec 13, 17:32
    • gregor on The Wage Thief: “Nope – I’m serious, Hatey – Should you persist being a dickhead – I’ll strip you stark naked (without touching…Dec 13, 17:08
    • Nae Need! on The Wage Thief: “Indeed.Dec 13, 17:03
    • gregor on The Wage Thief: “Sizzla: Overstanding: Solid As A Rock: “Oh ah oh ah yay! Oooh oooh oooh oooh oooh, yeah ay yeah ay!…Dec 13, 16:38
    • Shauny Boy on Keeping the fire burning: “I too am quite la-de-dah now amd appreciate the shoutout for co-op sea salt and chardonnay crisps, they’re the businessDec 13, 16:37
    • Hatey McHateface on The Wage Thief: ““MODERN IRREGULAR WARFARE” Wait! Wait! I know this one. I’ve seem them advertising on TV. You’re talking about LoveHoney, aren’t…Dec 13, 16:28
    • Hatey McHateface on The Wage Thief: “And then there’s another ethnic habit getting an airing right now, while so-called “progressive” politicians wish fervently it would go…Dec 13, 16:23
    • gregor on The Wage Thief: “Would you like me to continue ripping your integrity to pieces, Hatey Not a team-player ?Dec 13, 16:15
    • gregor on The Wage Thief: “Interesting link, MacDec 13, 16:09
    • gregor on The Wage Thief: “Only 2 anti-human Deep-State Butt-Plugs disagree ? If they had the courage (balls) to face me – I’ll utterly destroy…Dec 13, 16:08
    • Hatey McHateface on The Wage Thief: ““Hohahahaha” At last! A post from you we can all understand 🙂 It’s somebody laughing, right? Great work, gregor, that…Dec 13, 16:06
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
325
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x