The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The Scotsman backs Al-Qaeda

Posted on February 29, 2012 by

It doesn’t, of course. (We have it on good authority that the old-school-Tory broadsheet considers the Islamic-fundamentalist terrorist organisation to be a bit soft on homosexuality.) But as a headline, our statement is every bit as valid as the ridiculous one the paper has rather embarrassingly chosen to run on its front page today.

“SNP backs ‘devo-plus’ for independence vote”, hollers the once-august organ, possibly causing more naive readers to imagine that the SNP might have backed ‘devo-plus‘ for the independence vote. The marginally more wary would perhaps have been further persuaded by an opening paragraph which reads “The SNP wants the devo-plus option, which would see Holyrood take control of most taxes, included on the referendum ballot as an alternative to full independence.”

But of course, no such thing – or anything remotely close to it – has actually happened. Dig a few lines deeper and what you find is that some unnamed, unquoted “Nationalists” (who may or may not be in the SNP) have allegedly said that if “a strong body of opinion lines up behind devo-plus” (whatever that actually means), the Scottish Government might agree to include it on the referendum ballot.

(Despite the fact that on last night’s Newsnight Scotland, the proponents of devo-plus, including Jeremy Purvis and Tavish Scott, said that they didn’t want the option included in the vote at all. They want it to replace the status quo as the “No” choice.)

So to recap: some people who weren’t prepared to give their names have supposedly made comments which the paper has interpreted to mean that if certain vague conditions are met in the future something else might happen, in theory, despite that thing not being desired or supported even by the people who invented it. Quite the scoop for the Scotsman’s ace reporters – and for the high journalistic standards of the Scottish media as a whole – there, I’m sure we’d all agree.

Print Friendly

    1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

    1. 29 02 12 18:47

      The Scotsman & Scotland On Sunday | Pearltrees

    4 to “The Scotsman backs Al-Qaeda”

    1. redcliffe62 says:

      The Scotsman is terribly biased. Simple as that.

    2. RevStu says:

      Well, yes. It's always been biased, and it's allowed to be biased. But this is just flat-out awful journalism.

    3. steven luby says:

      In a comment I made earlier on the Scotsman, I started with,''Regardless of the mis-leading headline,''…………………so many newspapers do it, recently i've seen it happening more often on news bulletins too……………..as you say above,it's poor journalism all round!!!!

    4. Peter A Bell says:

      As stunningly dishonest as that headline in The Scotsman is, the truly staggering thing is that we have other British nationalist propaganda citing it as if it is an official statement of SNP policy.

      But what happened yesterday? The SNP quickly endorsed ‘devo plus’ as their preferred third option on the independence ballot paper. The nationalists’ conversion from ‘devo max’ to ‘devo plus’ was as speedy as it was cynical. But it has, for now, left opponents still treading water. – Scottish Tories won't advance until they support more devolution for Scotland

      These nutters are not only lying to the people of Scotland, they are lying to themselves. And believing it!



    Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.




    ↑ Top