The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The quality press

Posted on September 08, 2014 by

You have to laugh.

hoots

Anyone would think WE were the ones who’d had to remove, apologise for and pay compensation for defamatory articles about THEM.

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 08 09 14 11:02

    The quality press | FreeScotland

49 to “The quality press”

  1. Do they still accept links to the wee blue book?

    Reply
  2. Joseph says:

    LOL just soooo typical of the press, the sooner were free the sooner we can sort out our own media and punish them

    Reply
  3. R-type Grunt says:

    They’ll be gone soon.

    Reply
  4. Betty Boop says:

    Censorship – the Establishment at its best.

    Reply
  5. farrochie says:

    In the Scotsman you couldn’t say “shit” but you could say “sh1t”; “keech” was also an acceptable term.

    Reply
  6. Feil Gype says:

    They did that with Newsnet Scotland a long time ago….nae surprise they are doing it now.

    Reply
  7. Grant says:

    Use a tinyurl.

    Reply
  8. bunter says:

    O/T

    Very sorry. New royal baby on the way hahahahaha.

    Reply
  9. bookie from hell says:

    Alan Cochrane 08/09/2014

    Gordon Brown will concentrate in his barnstorming, nationwide tour beginning today.

    Alan Cochrane 09/06/2014

    Whose side are you on Gordon? The question must be posed in the wake of some wholly divisive interventions by the former prime minister.

    Reply
  10. Breastplate says:

    Do they allow independence or must it be called separation.
    I suppose it’s only fair as I call the “news” in The Scotsman ” bullshit”.

    Reply
  11. gillie says:

    John McTernan must be $hitting himself over at the Hootsmon.

    Reply
  12. NODROG says:

    How much longer will it take before the Establishment realise that their assumed moral authority has gone. The TRUTH is only a mouse click away and Truth will be victorious over deceit. Maybe a YES vote on the 18th will be the final nail in their coffin. I truly hope so.

    Reply
  13. Stoops says:

    They’re sulking. Tick tock.

    Reply
  14. gillie says:

    I keep hearing rumours that a number of Scottish Labour MPs, MSPS and assorted councillors will be voting Yes.

    Anyone else heard of this?

    Reply
  15. 1971Thistle says:

    Screw ’em.

    Just use a shortened URL, don’t mention website by name.

    Reply
  16. dennis mclaughlin says:

    Aye,Ian Davidson has his finger in the dyke and IF anyone makes a move he’ll gie them a doin’ or stick them with his trusty bayonet.

    DON’T PANIC!!

    Reply
  17. desimond says:

    Tomorrow in The Scotsman

    Rev. Stu Campbell is a Truth Teller.

    Reply
  18. bookie from hell says:

    REV—any comment on this–pure lying bile

    link to mirror.co.uk

    Reply
  19. Luigi says:

    The Reverend Stuart Campbell:

    Him who must not be named!

    Reply
  20. Ken MacColl says:

    Stopped buying the Hootsman about five years ago after reading it from the days when the front page was covered with small ads -early fifties?
    Stopped reading it online about two years ago.
    Stopped reading about it more recently when I could avoid it but still occasionally see snippets in the blogosphere.
    The drop in its standards has been relentless but I understand it is now on the verge of terminal decline and is likely to disappear soon.
    Sic transit Gloria mundi.

    Reply
  21. Tamson says:

    @gillie:

    I think an Inverclyde Labour councillor has already come out for Yes.
    If any more do, they’ll time it for next Sunday’s papers to maximise impact (in their opinion)

    Reply
  22. Clootie says:

    I think most of us just go onto their sites for fun.
    The public don’t read these rags anymore.

    Post the referendum vote they will wither and die. Unfortunately good people will suffer because their unionist owners consider their jobs a price worth paying for a NO vote.

    Reply
  23. galamcennalath says:

    If you google something like “role of the media in a democracy” you’ll find all sorts of links to lots of grand words about how a free press and broadcasting media can hold politicians to account, educate the population, etc etc.. All positive and wholesome.

    Then you look at the reality of the UK in the 21st Century. The MSM and broadcasters have become something quite different. Highly partisan, supporters of the elite and the establishment, instruments of propaganda, subverters of the democratic process. They set out to create news, rather than report it. Balanced and impartial? You don’t know whether to laugh or cry!

    In iScotland we should demand a quite different MSM and broadcasters. Ones which fulfil the role they are supposed to.

    Reply
  24. Betty Boop says:

    The quality press – aye, we wish.

    How about this disusting offering from The Scotsman linking the fate of the Scottish hostage with a Yes vote.

    If you don’t want to contribute to the rag’s coffers, this is the link to the archived version of the “story”:

    link to archive.today

    Reply
  25. Oneironaut says:

    Try writing it as “W1ng5 0v3r 5c0t14nd”.
    If nothing else, it’ll wind them up, hehe 😉

    Reply
  26. Craig P says:

    First rule of Establishment Club – don’t mention the truth.

    Reply
  27. Luigi says:

    Another 10% pay rise in the offing for our hard-working MPs?

    Not a great week to remind people just what a corrupt and self-serving institution the self-proclaimed “Mother of Parliaments” has become.

    Oh look, here comes the heavy cavalry (or should I say the “Lightweight Brigade”), featuring those well-known, and even better paid, Labour MPs, charging north to save the union. I hope Scotland gives them the welcome they deserve.

    Aye, it’s all coming together nicely. The perfect storm.

    Reply
  28. Betty Boop says:

    Apologies – link to archived version of Scotsman hostage story:

    link to archive.today

    Reply
  29. Frankie goes to Holyrood says:

    Indeed. It is a token attempt at a block as you would guess, but is pathetic.

    I just successfully posted this on the Scotsman:
    ====
    Reality check…

    Have a look at the Wee Blue Book from W.ings over Scotland!

    SOURCE
    link to weebluebook.info

    Reply
  30. Oneironaut says:

    I think someone at The Scotsman has noticed the way the wind is blowing though.

    The last few sentences of this article with the repeated use of the word “we” to refer to Yes campaigners, strikes me as a rather feeble attempt to say: “Yay, we really believe in you Yes guys! We’re with you!”

    link to scotsman.com

    Wonder if that’ll salvage their newspaper sales after independence?

    Reply
  31. donnywho says:

    just wasted the morning battling unionist trolls on the Scotsman. I know i shouldn’t but i am a bit like a fly to a light. On about the currency meltdown. It is all Salmonds fault, nothing to do with the rejection of a currency union. Nothing to do with an oil-less petro-currency, nothing to do with balance of payments or the astronomical debt. No it is all because Salmond is a fat eating egotist and it serve us right.
    Their oy that Scottish institutions are falling on the stock exchange is just a further example of “proud jockary”. They are a sad bunch and i hope most are not resident Scots.
    Still you have to fight their lies and smears, even if the dung-heap smells

    Reply
  32. the great elbe says:

    do the hootsmon pay the britnat trolls on there rag of a site or is it gchq? ps i see proud brit scot craig reedie venting his unionist spleen again courtesy of the said publication, anyone would think they were all in it together to undermine scotland………………

    Reply
  33. Macart says:

    We’ve got a quality press? 😀

    Reply
  34. Onwards says:

    @donnywho

    I have a go on the Scotsman forums as well.
    It is obvious they have a handful of obsessive / paid posters with multiple ids, ticking each other up.

    Depressing stuff, but I don’t think it is a good idea just to ignore it at this time, and leave it a unionist only voice preaching to the undecideds that come along.

    Annoyingly, they still have many thousands of readers, especially online.

    Reply
  35. Albert Herring says:

    “We’ve got a quality press?”

    We’ve got a press?

    Reply
  36. No no no...Yes says:

    Donnywho 11.14am

    I was in a trap as well. They are trying to wind you up and keeping you distracted.
    6 weeks ago, I shouted at the TV, swore at papers and argued online. I gained nothing other than frustration and increased blood pressure.

    I pushed myself outside my comfort zone, because the referendum is so important.
    Being active in the YES campaign has been transformational. Speak to your local group, there are so many ways to help, which can be tailored to you. You will feel so much better doing something positive.

    Reply
  37. HandandShrimp says:

    I think it is a health and safety thing. If the words WoS appear on the Hoot Euan comes out in hives.

    🙂

    Reply
  38. Fireproofjim says:

    Oneironaut
    To be fair, Leslie Riddoch has always been a comitted yes campaigner. Evn when writing in the Scotsman. (a paper which has deteriorated sadly in recent years)

    Reply
  39. Jacqueline says:

    Was it something you said

    Reply
  40. Jamie Arriere says:

    Quality press? Is that anything like the Quality Polis?

    link to alturl.com

    Reply
  41. tig says:

    just use tinyurl to change the name of the link to get round their shenanigans

    Reply
  42. Iain (orri) McCord says:

    Probably covering their asses in case their moderators are too slow to act on defamatory comments posted in their fora.

    Reply
  43. Allan Thomson says:

    To think I used to buy the Scotsman. Oh well better late than never!

    Reply
  44. Zen Broon says:

    Only 10 days left to save The Scotsman.

    Reply
  45. Finnz says:

    Think I’ll continue to wind them up on every opportunity with references to the Wings site.

    They may need to ban the words ‘Scotland’ and ‘over’ eventually.

    Reply
  46. Mary Bruce says:

    “Anyone would think WE were the ones who’d had to remove, apologise for and pay compensation…”

    They paid out compensation? Yes!

    Reply
  47. Wee Jimmy says:

    I wonder if “w-egg-ings over Sc-egg-otland” would get through their cunning filter 😉

    Reply
  48. JimnArlene says:

    Toys out the pram…..

    Reply
  49. Tom Foyle says:

    Supposing you just wanted to insult WoS? Supposing you wanted to call them a bunch of selfish bastards who only want what’s best for the people of Scotland? How are you supposed to slag someone off if you can’t even mention the NAME of the slagee?
    They’ve now scraped the bottom of the barrel so hard and for so long, that there’s a HOLE in the bloody thing – and yet they’re STILL scraping away!

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,984 Posts, 1,252,118 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • sam on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Not so sure about this claim, Alf. There were many armed uprisings in colonial Ireland against English rule. The 1715…” Oct 2, 17:21
    • Dave on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Wow, the fund is filling up fast, excellent news! I, for one, cannot wait to see the miscreants sweating on…” Oct 2, 17:18
    • agentx on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Why it is considered secure • Direct Lawyer Payouts: Funds do not go to the individual starting the page. Money…” Oct 2, 17:16
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “@Alf – No, those of us who learn read the theory then use it to put it into practice and…” Oct 2, 16:54
    • James on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Keep ’em coming, ‘Confused’. Larry, curly and Moe bite every time. Speaking of stooges I wonder when the fragrant ‘Adrian’…” Oct 2, 16:53
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Who had Freire on their Bingo card?” Oct 2, 16:39
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I’m assuming “sparky” refers to “Spartan”, if I can read correctly through your blurry alcohol-fuelled stupor, 8 Ace. “tell (sic…” Oct 2, 16:30
    • Alf Baird on In The Eyes Of The Law: ““uses the quotes of others” This is nothing new for academics who logically base their research first on the available…” Oct 2, 16:17
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “You are right Confused! Your unhinged idiocy is truly legendary., even here. Very conversation-worthy, personally I find it incredible. Always…” Oct 2, 16:04
    • sarah on In The Eyes Of The Law: “@ douglas – you can reduce the tip, even to zero.” Oct 2, 16:01
    • douglas on In The Eyes Of The Law: “happy to contribute, not happy with crowdjustice. Imposing an extra 20% and calling it a tip is taking the p.…” Oct 2, 15:44
    • lothianlad on The Turning Point: “The SNP leadership have actively working FOR the british state. Sturgeon is the greatest traitor to Scotland in the modern…” Oct 2, 15:22
    • lothianlad on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Well done Stu! They are rattled! Only those with integrity should be allowed power.” Oct 2, 15:20
    • Confused on In The Eyes Of The Law: “The only thing worse than being talked about, is NOT being talked about … I seem to have the WORST…” Oct 2, 15:13
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “James likes to label anyone he disagrees with as “Unionist” or “Yoon”. A bit like Confused’s rantings when its necked…” Oct 2, 14:44
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Cesaire wrote about “goitrous academics”. I don’t think he was being complimentary, although I do recommend that anybody interested should…” Oct 2, 13:57
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I’m not going anywhere, Fatty. Enjoy.” Oct 2, 13:34
    • James on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Unionist shill; **** off. There’s a good chap.” Oct 2, 13:03
    • Knuckle_Heid on In The Eyes Of The Law: “£100 donated – go get ’em Rev!” Oct 2, 12:13
    • Connor on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Why no paypal option ? Sorry I do not feel safe having to give my card details to all, paypal…” Oct 2, 11:39
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I respect anyone who gets up for work every morning, goes to work, pays their own way, pays their taxes…” Oct 2, 11:28
    • crisiscult on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Middle class, working class, etc have become a bit meaningless in how they are used today, the terms often being…” Oct 2, 11:09
    • Lollysmum on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Donated-keep up the good work Stu.” Oct 2, 10:55
    • Southernbystander on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Once you become a professor in this country you become middle class whether you were before or not. Alf suggests…” Oct 2, 10:30
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Yep, I reckon Messrs. Fanon and Césaire were early pioneers of Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V.” Oct 2, 10:18
    • Craig P on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Was a Labour MSP, Colin Smyth.” Oct 2, 09:50
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Alf doesn’t have any of his own opinions, he just uses the quotes of others. That Masters or PhD must’ve…” Oct 2, 09:45
    • sam on In The Eyes Of The Law: “The police would have to pay attention to the findings of the court in considering what fresh evidence there might…” Oct 2, 09:42
    • Cynicus on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I doubt if Mr Murrell is a trustee of the fund.” Oct 2, 09:32
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “So have you donated or not, Alf? Or are you rudely derailing ANOTHER thread with your garbage?” Oct 2, 09:18
  • A tall tale



↑ Top