The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland



Madman Of The Year 59

Posted on August 31, 2012 by

We’ve mentioned previously that one of the core tactics the No camp appears to be utilising in the referendum debate is that of attrition through extremism. It’s a strategy borrowed from the terrifying American right wing, and has two main goals.

One is to recalibrate the perceived centre-ground by abandoning any kind of moderate position and instead arguing positions so self-evidently ludicrous and dishonest that the listener is nudged towards assuming that they must be true purely on the grounds that nobody would dare to present such an audacious lie with a straight face. The other is to simply exhaust your opponents by forcing them to constantly battle over even the most basic and obvious facts, long before you get to the real debating points.

It’s a nihilistic but clever ploy, particularly effective in broadcast media where time is often very limited and such obfuscatory stalling can completely prevent the serious issues from being addressed at all. So far it seems to be pretty much the only weapon in Scottish Labour’s armoury, not just in respect of the referendum but also politics generally – a good example being the party’s absurd claims about the cost of knife crime during the 2011 election campaign.

It applies at the macro level as well as at the top end of the scale. When we started this blog we subscribed to the Twitter accounts of lots of prominent Labour activists in a naive attempt at engaging in genuine constructive debate, but were gradually forced to the realisation that the primary (or only) point of their dialogue was to deliberately waste our time and exasperate us into submission, and unfollowed them all.

So rather than be drawn into attempting to intelligently and forensically deconstruct three of the most recent outpourings of (calculated) lunacy from some of the No camp’s leading mad old men, we’re going to treat them with the amount of respect they deserve. Read the three articles below, then use your skill and judgement to decide (via the poll over in the central column) who’s the most barking-mad mental.

Michael Kelly in the Scotsman, insisting that an independent Scotland having its own defence forces is a hilarious joke

Alan Cochrane in the Telegraph, burbling about Alex Salmond sacrificing the referendum in return for more powers

Ian Smart in his shed, banging his worn-out drum of how Salmond doesn’t want to have a referendum in the first place

Vote now!

The Big Lie and the many small lies 18

Posted on April 02, 2012 by

We’ve referenced “The Big Lie” before on Wings Over Scotland. As that link explains, it’s a propaganda technique invented by Adolf Hitler in order to convince people of particularly enormous untruths. It’s one often employed by the Unionist parties, especially Labour – to name but one example, their persistent labelling of the SNP as “Tartan Tories”, despite the independently-assessed facts that the SNP are considerably to the left of Labour on the political spectrum, and that on an equally impartial policy-convergence test it’s Labour who are by far the closest of all Scotland’s parties to the Conservatives in terms of ideology.

But while in the internet age the Big Lie is harder to get away with, recently Labour and its ever-compliant friends in the Scottish media have begun to utilise a subtle twist on the method – the Big Lie Made Up Of Many Small Lies. This new variant can be seen most clearly in this weekend’s co-ordinated, manufactured outbreak of outrage about the Scottish Government’s consultation on the independence referendum.

Scotland On Sunday went with the story first, in an embarrassingly transparent and incoherent piece from Tom Peterkin, and the Scotsman clearly thought the “scandal” good enough to also lead with it on today’s front page, under the gibberish headline “Nationalists anonymous spark new referendum dispute“.

(Is “Nationalists Anonymous” some sort of support group for Labour, Lib Dem and Tory members who back independence? If so, their name is a proper noun and really ought to have both of its words capitalised.)

The Herald also runs a front-page lead on the same topic, entitled “Salmond accused of rigging poll feedback“, and it was the main item on The Sunday Politics Scotland, with Scottish Labour’s de facto leader Anas Sarwar given lots of airtime to attack the SNP’s increasingly effective Stewart Hosie on the allegations (who comported himself extremely well, and is fast becoming one of the party’s most reliable assets).

But the reason the Big Lie Made Up Of Many Small Lies is an effective technique is that it makes it considerably harder for the victim of the lie(s) to refute it/them, simply because it’s hard to know where to start. To illustrate the point, let’s see if we can break down this particular Big Lie (“The SNP are rigging the consultation!”) into just some of its component parts.

Read the rest of this entry →

Poor wee Scotland 5

Posted on March 11, 2012 by

The Unionist parties aren’t completely stupid. While we all know that one of their core arguments against independence is that Scotland is too wee, too poor and too stupid to survive without the rest of the UK, they’re not quite daft enough to be caught coming out and bluntly saying it in those terms.

So they were faced with a tricky dilemma with the release of the latest GERS figures last week, which showed that Scotland contributed over £2bn more to the UK economy in the 2009/10 fiscal year than it got back in UK Government spending. (And that figure itself neglects a number of large discrepancies in the figures, where money considered as “Scottish spending” isn’t actually spent in Scotland at all, such as almost a billion pounds on defence alone.)

One approach is to get friendly journalists to print unchallenged quotes and then use them in your headlines. The other, not-unrelated strategy is to spin the figures in such a way that Scotland subsidising the rest of the UK somehow sounds like the exact opposite – or as the Herald’s story put it, “Labour, Tory and Liberal Democrat politicians claimed the report proved Scotland was better off within the UK.”

The job of explaining this remarkable distortion of the truth fell to the unfortunate Ken Macintosh, finance spokesman for Scottish Labour, who was shoved onto Newsnight Scotland on March 7th to explain why Scotland having more money on the plus side of its books would be a bad thing. It was a tough line to push, and poor Ken was forced to begin by trying to convince viewers that he didn’t understand the basic concept of how arithmetic works. Let’s break down his comments and see how he did, and what it tells us about the Unionist vision of Scotland, starting with his opening gambit.

Read the rest of this entry →

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,758 Posts, 1,217,964 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Attention is drawn particularly to the DEFINITIVE KEYNOTE SPEECH BY PROFESSOR ROBERT BLACK KC starting at 1.46.35 into youtube version…May 19, 11:11
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “The “Cookie Law” does not cover cookies that are used for the normal functioning of the site – login sessions,…May 19, 10:57
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “My point sailed in one ear and out the other. I posted a link about the American constitution – you…May 19, 10:51
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““always wish to close down the treaty of union topic by any means possible, even threats to Scotland” Hmmmm. I’m…May 19, 10:42
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Hatey McHateface, I recognise your point on how vunerable infrastruture is especially wire,cables and pipe lines, This does seem to…May 19, 10:24
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Englands parliament will manage to end the so called union, merger annexation by its presumptive arrogance, It does not need…May 19, 09:56
    • Breastplate on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Make sure to check under your bed before going to sleep tonight, John.May 19, 09:49
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “If you say so, James. I’m not really understanding who is threatening who. YL Sah! seemed to be suggesting that…May 19, 09:43
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “If the Act of union was never signed does imply that the UK and intel are an illegal entity, that…May 19, 09:31
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Your statement at 7.36 am regards resources and assets is helpful to the independence supporters in confirming that Scotland is…May 19, 09:11
    • David on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “The haters gonna hate! It never fails to amaze me the amount of hate mail you get from all different…May 19, 07:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““How about a draft constitution? A set of well defined rules” How about you explain why any Sovereign Scot should…May 19, 07:42
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““these resources are only vulnerable if we are independent” It’s not exactly rocket science, YL Sah! At the moment these…May 19, 07:36
    • Young Lochinvar on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “You are left to (academically) wonder how the comfortable status quo for UK/US might alter completely if; 1. Dump the…May 19, 03:01
    • Skip_NC on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Aw come on, I thought that was quite good for a Saturday morning before I’d had my coffee. In my…May 19, 01:35
    • Iain M. Conochie on Well, this is a little embarrassing: ““This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyse traffic. Your IP address and user agent…May 18, 23:42
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “This is a (very) long but, interesting read, https://sonar21.com/the-constitution-is-dead-long-live-the-constitution/ It gives you an insight on how constitutional-fundamentalists in America -…May 18, 19:06
    • robertkknight on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Back to business… youtube.com/live/Z2lVgoA6UHQ?feature=shared Fantastic and illuminating. Makes you realise, if you didn’t already, what a dead horse the SNP…May 18, 17:02
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Care to elaborate?May 18, 16:35
    • Chas on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I strongly disagree with the first 3 words in your latest piece of drivel.May 18, 16:22
    • diabloandco on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Yeah Rev , take your own advice and ignore trolls. He’s obviously desperate for attention – a bit like Trump…May 18, 15:17
    • Hatey McHateface on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Well, James, I guess that 318 years and counting is a mere eyeblink in geological terms. In human terms though,…May 18, 15:00
    • 100%Yes on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “@ Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh Thanks, added your site to my bookmarks. It would help if Wings updated Pro-Indy bloggers on his…May 18, 13:59
    • 100%Yes on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “I believe David Henry was saying that the wording of the treaty of Union has recently been changed to say…May 18, 13:44
    • Eagle on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Kelly of course is so full of self righteous anger that he forgets that actually watching it and voting is…May 18, 13:04
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “If anyone has a problem with the above URL link, try this alternative path: SCOTTISH SOVEREIGNTY RESEARCH GROUP CONFERENCE (17…May 18, 13:02
    • James Cheyne on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “100%Yes.. I will away and watch it just now, thanks for the information, I am looking forward to the piece…May 18, 13:00
    • Stuart MacKay on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “Ha, ha the saga of Kelly-gate goes on and on and on. Now we have the prime antagonist lambasting the…May 18, 12:17
    • Angry Weegie on Echoes from history: ““You know the next four words, right?” I (re)read “A Letter from Quebec” and it almost reduced me to tears,…May 18, 12:17
    • Skip_NC on Well, this is a little embarrassing: “James Kelly as a spook-paid disruptor? No, I don’t see it. He’s just an overblown windbag. He’s been spouting the…May 18, 11:55
  • A tall tale



↑ Top