The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Straw dogs

Posted on November 13, 2012 by

A press release on the always-positive Scottish Labour website this morning blares a wake-up call to the reckless and irresponsible Scottish Government. “IPPR Report Shows SNP Economic Policy Is Financially Illiterate”, it rages, going on to quote the party’s finance spokesman Ken Macintosh:

“This report shows that the SNP’s economic policy is financially illiterate. Not only do we get more spending than we raise as a result of being in the Union, but the SNP’s commitment to turn Scotland into a low-tax corner of Europe would see revenues plummet and public spending slashed to the bone. Scotland would be crippled by what could only be described as economic suicide.”

Oof. Strong words for sure. Hang on, though – which SNP economic policy are we actually talking about here? The preamble to Macintosh’s furious blast references “the SNP’s plans to cut Corporation Tax to 12.5%”. But the only problem with that is that the SNP doesn’t appear to have any such plans.

We scoured Google for evidence, but haven’t been able to find a single story, report or quote where the SNP has ever proposed a 12.5% rate of CT. What there are are lots of stories where journalists on Unionist newspapers note that the Nats have suggested the possibility of cutting Corporation Tax were it to be devolved to the Scottish Parliament, and in which said journalists have also claimed that Northern Ireland – where the tax is likely to be devolved to Stormont – intends to cut it to 12.5%.

We can’t, we should point out, actually find any solid evidence to support this claim either – it seems to be based purely on the fact that the tax is 12.5% in the Republic Of Ireland, and that the logical thing would therefore be for NI to set the same rate in order to compete better with its southern neighbour.

The journalists have nevertheless then put two and two together and assumed that because the SNP wants control of the tax devolved like it is in NI, and because the level there might be 12.5%, that the SNP’s plan must be to cut it to the same level in Scotland. The SNP itself, on the other hand, has never said any such thing. Examine this piece by former Labour spin doctor Lorraine Davidson in The Times all the way back in August 2011, for example:

“Alex Salmond yesterday set out his long-awaited plans for cutting the overall rate of corporation tax in Scotland — but backed away from a commitment to reduce it to 12.5 per cent, as had been widely predicted.”

Observe the use of the word “predicted”, which is a sneaky journalistic way of not-quite-admitting that you’ve got something completely wrong and that the entity you’re talking about didn’t say the thing you thought they would. And interestingly, if you dig out the IPPR report cited (but not linked to) in Labour’s press release, it only attributes the notion of a 12.5% rate to “some leading Scottish business figures”, with no mention of the SNP having put forward or even endorsed the idea.

[EDIT: an alert reader in the comments below reveals that the SNP’s actual suggested rate of Corporation Tax for Scotland is 20%, not 12.5%.]

The straw man is a key weapon in Scottish Labour’s armoury. Bereft of any policies of their own, they can’t attack the SNP by putting forward alternative proposals, so the only route left is to pretend the Nats’ policies are something other than what they really are, and then rubbish the fake policies which exist only in Labour’s own propaganda. It’s an ugly, negative tactic which conspicuously failed to work between 2007 and 2011, but the party seems too paralysed by deep-rooted tribal oppositionism to try anything else.

In the interests of fairness, we contacted both Scottish Labour and Ken Macintosh and politely asked them if they could provide a single source for the SNP actually advocating a cut in Corporation Tax to 12.5%. If they come up with one, we will of course let you know immediately.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Doug Daniel

“we get more spending than we raise as a result of being in the Union”

Wow, I had no idea the UK was unique in the world in being able to borrow money!

Unless Ken is trying to suggest that the UK does not have to borrow money and the extra spending we get (in absolute terms – we all know we get LESS in relation to the rest of the UK) is a subsidy from England, then I’m not quite sure what his point is. And if that IS what he’s suggesting, then it’s demonstrably untrue.

Lies. It’s all they have. 

Morag

As far as that point goes, Doug, I only recently realised it myself.  I think it needs wider dissemination, which to be fair I see people trying to achieve.

Angus McLellan

Evidence that the SNP had different plans might be helpful. After all, if John Swinney had talked openly about this then we might know what the SNP had in mind. If he’d done that, then we’d be able to link to his comments. Something like this maybe: link to scotland.gov.uk
Well, 12.5% and 20% are close enough that confusing the two is perfectly natural. An honest mistake then, nothing sinister about it at all.
 

Macart

@Angus McLellan

Nice link, makes a difference when you actually have what the government says in front of you.

I’d be fascinated to find out the source of their information, since Angus had a wildly different yet very official source to hand in the Scotgov web site. I’d be even more fascinated to see the results of the SG calling Mcintosh and the report’s authors out on that source.

Doug

 FMQs 4/10/12 –  another example of transference from Lamont/Labour?

Johann Lamont: The First Minister loves having straw men to cut down.”

http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28862.aspx?r=7401&i=67520&c=1368943

(other examples being the accusations of negativity, of lack of detail, of inconsistency, of “Tartan Tories” etc etc…)

ronald alexander mcdonald

“We get” means we are given our share of the debt. Nothing more. That debt relates to the annual defecit.

It would be easier for an Independent Scotland to cut  our annual defecit, without effecting ordinary people. In arears such as defence etc.    

CyBOS

This is a cynical strawman atttack to divert attention away from the disaster of a speech given by Alistair Darling, the Abominable No Man, last Friday at the John P MacKintosh Memorial Lecture in Prestonpans.

Even The Scottish Sun tore Mr Darling a new one over the ludicrous substance of the speech
link to thescottishsun.co.uk      

Arbroath 1320

Oh dear, nothing good is happening on the Bitter front so out they come with more of their lies, deceit and misinformation. Never mind there are always these stories to help balance the books a wee bit.
 
link to heraldscotland.com
 
Looks like A.s. is a popular speaker, can’t exactly say the same about Darling. Apparently there are still loads of tickets available for his interview with John Snow. Now I wonder why that is……..
 
Talking of the big featie, it would appear that he might be trying to push his influence, does he actually have any influence, over onto the Electoral Commission. Now in my mind this is more than a bit naughty of him,, but then again when has he ever cared about the rights and wrongs of what he does.
 
link to scottishtimes.com
 
Finally here’s a piece by Joan McAlpine in the D.R.  She deals a bit with the McCrone report. Joan also quotes from a Price Waterhouse report from last year.

Northern Lights, a Pricewaterhouse Coopers report published last year, reported that there was £376billion of value left in the North Sea over the next 40 years.”
 
link to dailyrecord.co.uk
 
I think this is about the third article in the D.R. this week that pours scorn over the unionists. I wonder, just the slightest of wonderings you understand, but all the same I wonder if there are one or two individuals at the D.R. who might, just might, be beginning to see the error of their ways. Only time will tell for sure but it does make for an interesting week ahead methinks.

Angus McLellan

Corporation tax is complicated. Isn’t everything?
If you read the media reporting on the Commons’ Public Accounts Committee fun with Google, Starbucks and Amazon yesterday you might be left with the impression that the Netherlands, Switzerland and Luxemburg have low rates of corporation tax. The situation in Luxemburg is complicated as there are 3 different regimes for corporate tax, but the basic one has a 28% rate. The rates in the Netherlands and Switzerland are 25%. And in the UK? That’ll be a “predatory” 23%.
Of the three companies, only Google make use of truly low-corporation tax havens. Amazon and Starbucks have much more complex setups which don’t rely on low headline rates of tax to reduce their liabilities.

Keith B

..more spending than we raise as a result of being in the Union……”


The No’s have a graphic to back this up……at this point I was going to link to a graphic from the Better Together website’s “photojournal”, but it appears to have disappeared. It showed that Scotland receives 20% more spending than it contributes. Pretty damning stuff, especially as the figures were taken from GERS.
 
The only problem was that they had appeared to have missed the full implication of their figures, as this graphic shows (the top part being the original Better Together graphic);
 
comment image
 
No wonder the original graphic appears to have been removed, but no surprise that Ken MacIntosh and Labour seem to be a bit slow on the uptake.
 
The good news is that they appear to be happy to use GERS as an authoritative source.
 

Doug

Keith B

I had some fun pointing this out to the Better Together lot, but the graphic did boil down to these explicit points, omitting the implicit (in square brackets)

“Stay in the union because you have a SCARY deficit/debt [, although the deficit would be 17% less in an independent Scotland]”

“Things are bad in Scotland, [but if you stay in the UK, you’ll have the opportunity to have it a lot worse]”

Of course, this assumes that all spending/tax etc would be identical in an independent Scotland (which is, again, manifestly unlikely to be the case).

John Lyons

12.5% or 20% it doesn’t actually matter.

Having recently read your articles on PFI, Labour have some gall to call anyone financially illiterate!

I wouldn’t trust them to correctly manage the whip round for the bus driver that took them to conference!

Arbroath 1320

Twelve and a half per cent.
 
Twenty per cent.
 
Hmm, I can see how it is an easy mistake to make.
 
Both claims start “twe” and both claims end “per cent”
 
The only problem is the middle bit, so I can see how Labour can make such a fundamental mistake. Perhaps next time they should read the WHOLE thing and not just the start and finish bits. 😀

Clachangowk

The main message that I take from Mackintosh’s statement is that he ( and labour) expect the SNP to be the future Government in an independent (and perhaps not independent) Scotland.

Labour have obviously already given up any thoughts of future Government and can only make up porkies about what the SNP will do.

I am waiting for Labour to come out and join the Tories in running down the SNP Government’s ambition to have highspeed rail between Edinburgh and Glasgow.

For me, the attack by the Tories on this ambition/vision by a Scottish Government is symptomatic of Tories’ visceral antipathy to anything Scotland does outside the parameters of Westminster. I knew the Tories were bad for Scotland  but just how bad is probably just coming home to me. They really do expect us to lie down, be quiet and wait until Westminster tells us what to do.

Angus McLellan

@Arbroath1320: Right. So the moral of the story could be “donut use predicate tea”. Or even “don’t use predictive text”.

Dubbieside

Rev Stu

To be fair to Leftfootforward they have pointed out in the article Labour are wrong about the twelve and a half tax rate.

The appropriate line is,

The only problem is that the SNP’s policy is to cut corporation tax to 20%, a position the IPPR states is “achievable”.

Their starting line is also worth looking at,

“Financially illiterate”? Scottish Labour must do better

Maybe Denis Canavan is starting to get his message across?

dadsarmy

Ken Macintosh does have quite a compelling line of logic though. It seems that the rUK contributes £500 billion of UK taxation, but receive £622 billion of UK spending.

So I guess that means Scotland is subsidising England, Wales and Northern Ireland to the tune of £122 billion a year!

Amazing what you can do with inverse figures.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,670 Posts, 1,202,849 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Republicofscotland on The Long Unravelling: “Its shows us – just how corrupt and far removed the political scene is from Scots, when Anas Sarwar the…Nov 22, 10:51
    • Mia on The Long Unravelling: “An much more distressing thought for me is that, if those disgusting individuals with absolute no principles, no morals, no…Nov 22, 10:39
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: ““as long as those parasites who claim to represent us can keep their salaries, pensions and access to subsidised bars,…Nov 22, 10:38
    • Republicofscotland on The Long Unravelling: ““Glasgow is an Indy stronghold.” Of course it is – why do you think that there are more security cameras…Nov 22, 10:28
    • Mac on The Long Unravelling: “You are on here, every day, all day, posting the same black lies that have been debunked a long time…Nov 22, 10:27
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “It’s not an “anglo-american” war though is it. Currently 41 countries are providing active support to U. All of this…Nov 22, 10:22
    • Mia on The Long Unravelling: “And paying for one shit parliament is far, far cheaper than having to pay for three: Keep Holyrood and ditch…Nov 22, 10:22
    • Andrew F on The Long Unravelling: “Devoid of facts and overflowing with bigoted bile – let alone juvenile playground insults. If anyone has a right to…Nov 22, 10:21
    • Mia on The Long Unravelling: ““It is staffed by incompetent people with no real.skills outside of being in politics” The exact same applies to Westminster…Nov 22, 10:13
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “There’s a number of facts in my post, “Mac”. You should take them on board. I’m finding that by sticking…Nov 22, 10:04
    • Gordon on The Long Unravelling: “Give up on that pish, who ever capitalised a letter in the middle of a name?Nov 22, 10:04
    • Sven on The Long Unravelling: ““These plunderers of the world” ; their appetite and greed recognise no borders.Nov 22, 09:52
    • Shug on The Long Unravelling: “I read that the SNP just lost another 3 council seats. That makes 15 now i think. Has Swinney realised…Nov 22, 09:50
    • Mia on The Long Unravelling: ““if Wingers truly believe that any enemy of ours must be given carte blanche to do as they want” A…Nov 22, 09:44
    • Zander Tait on The Long Unravelling: “It is a distressing thought that if Nikita Stalin, Evans, Wark, Garavelli, Swinney, Ruddock, Lloyd and all the others had…Nov 22, 09:37
    • Mac on The Long Unravelling: “Having a government that is consumed with an unexplained hatred for the source of cheap and plentiful energy on Europe’s…Nov 22, 09:22
    • Mia on The Long Unravelling: ““the sabotage and destruction that’s been ongoing since 2014” I like to call it British and USA’s deep states’ sponsored…Nov 22, 09:21
    • TURABDIN on The Long Unravelling: “The anglo-american Nato war by proxy in central Europe ought to be a game-changer for the bright , if there…Nov 22, 09:18
    • Mia on The Long Unravelling: “Actually, twathater, he might have been democratically elected to the post of MSP, but he was “coronated” as leader of…Nov 22, 09:03
    • Zander Tait on The Long Unravelling: “Thanks RM, So another poll showing 52% to 48% in favour of Yes. Humpster will be down in the Dumpster.Nov 22, 08:42
    • Dan on The Long Unravelling: “If energy is too expensive to buy to keep you, your family home, or business premises warm, you can at…Nov 22, 08:41
    • Mac on The Long Unravelling: “Now into telling blatant lies to justify gen0ocide and ethnic cleansing. What a repulsive individual. The world can see who…Nov 22, 08:09
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “Winter Covid’s making a resurgence, Gregor. Many don’t know when they have it. First thing to go is the sense…Nov 22, 07:52
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “Stupidity, surely. He’s standing with the burners of babies, the rapist mutilators of teenage lassies, the hostage takers, the indiscriminate…Nov 22, 07:27
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “Well, well. So you do have an ‘S’ on your keyboard. It’s just “scotland” that has to go without. Who’d…Nov 22, 07:16
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “‘This is not a case of me , you , or anyway else thinking our opinions are ” superior ”’…Nov 22, 07:07
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “Sure, Breeks. The soil of Holy Mother R is, of course, sacred. The soil of everywhere else, like U for…Nov 22, 07:00
    • Hatey McHateface on The Long Unravelling: “Falling out of windows is certainly endemic in R and its satellites. But targets and innocent bystanders can also get…Nov 22, 06:53
    • Robert Hughes on The Long Unravelling: “Yes , indeed , B . I’ve never known such levels of mendacious propaganda being spewed 24/7 by MSM &…Nov 22, 06:03
    • Oneliner on The Long Unravelling: “Yep – better to stick to an ad hominem like ‘microbe’ Do you have any mirrors in your butt an’…Nov 22, 05:21
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
114
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x