The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Stable door “to be bolted soon”

Posted on July 20, 2012 by

As we predicted a few days ago, Sevco Scotland Limited has accepted the SFA’s condition of a 12-month transfer embargo in return for the company being allowed to take over the Association membership of the old Rangers Football Club PLC. In a novel twist, though, the SFA will not enforce the sanction until AFTER the closure of the summer transfer window on September 1st, allowing the Ibrox club to sign new players for the next six weeks, despite the embargo having been imposed in May.

Despite some of the wilder conspiracy theories circulating on the internet in recent days, the agreement was always going to happen, although we’re a little surprised (only a little, mind) at how blatantly the SFA has gone easy on the club – with over 40 players available to manager Ally McCoist even with the embargo in place, the deferral makes a mockery of the notion of punishment.

(An alert reader points out to us that the club will also be able to sign players, albeit briefly, in next summer’s transfer window, because a quirk of the calendar means it’ll be open for a day after Sevco’s embargo expires. There’s nothing to stop “Rangers” negotiating transfers next summer, then doing all the actual signings on September 2nd, so the punishment only really applies to the January 2013 window. In effect, rather than a 12-month ban it’s actually a four-week one.)

But Charles Green was never going to kick up much of a fuss about the embargo anyway, because it suits him fine. A clause in his sale agreement with Duff & Phelps allowed him to back out of the purchase of the Rangers assets if the club wasn’t playing in the top division of Scottish football, but he showed no interest in activating it even after Sevco FC was sent to SFL Division 3. The embargo does him no harm, because Mr Green doesn’t want to spend a penny more on New Rangers than he has to – he’s looking to sell it for a nice profit at the first available opportunity.

Still, putting off the punishment should enable Green to add a little strength and depth to the playing squad, with a few seasoned old pros good enough to do a turn in SFL3, at pretty minimal expense. He can still plead financial circumstances as an excuse for not making any major signings, and the ruling should minimise the chances of Sevco FC failing to get out of the bottom division at the first time of asking.

That said, we still wouldn’t actually put any money on the newco club completing the season. Our view remains that Green would be perfectly happy to see a second insolvency event and sell up, either to John Brown’s fantasy consortium or to a property developer. (There’s some fascinating new information on the latter here.)

As we’ve said for weeks, he can’t lose either way – if he somehow balances the books and gets the club on a firm financial footing, he can make a fortune selling it as a going concern or by punting shares to investors and fans. If he can’t – and in our view that’s still the more likely outcome – he can make plenty of money in a fire sale, given the ludicrously low price he was allowed to pay for the assets.

Basically, today’s agreement just postpones the ultimate decision day for Sevco Scotland to a few months down the line. There are still EBTs and dual contracts to worry about, and a whole raft of other potential issues. But finally we can state with a reasonable degree of certainty that there WILL be a football club, trading under the name “Rangers” and laying claim to that club’s history, playing professional football in Scotland next season. For how long, and how many people will be watching it, are questions still awaiting answers.

.

EDIT 8.02pm: The SFA has contacted us to state that in fact the summer 2013 transfer window WILL close on August 31st, despite that being a Saturday, and that Rangers will NOT be able to sign players on the following Monday.

As you can see, we’ve sought absolute clarification, and await further response.

3 to “Stable door “to be bolted soon””

  1. jimmyarab says:

    I think I’ve finally got my head around the whole Sevco / newco/ Rangers thingymajig.
    It’s actually quite easy and just requires a good bit of lateral thinking.
    Sevco will accept a ban on buying new players and this will have nothing to do with them being the old Rangers and getting the old ban. It’s just a ban that was put in place and they decided to accept it for no reason really. Just a made up ban put in place as a penalty for getting into SFL3. A penalty picked out of thin air and accepted by Sevco.  Errr I think that’s it.

    Reply
  2. Iain MacLachlan says:

    Doesn’t that mean they are in contempt of court? After all they ask the court if it was legal. The court said no and the SFA must not do it. Sevco said that’s nice, we won. Now they are sticking two fingers up at the court. I think if I had passed the original judgement, I would be a bit miffed at this turn of events.

    Reply
  3. redcliffe62 says:

    As the old Rangers is not yet liquidated surely the monies on transferred players who never committed to the new organisation should go to the creditors who are owed millions of pounds?
    Am I missing something?  

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,958 Posts, 1,247,642 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Red on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “and as a nationalist here my problem Aa a nationalist, your problem is that the SNP hates you, and wants…Jul 25, 00:06
    • Red on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Let’s get rid of them. Hook, crook, or chased into the sea. I don’t care.Jul 24, 22:29
    • robertkknight on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Rip it up and start again. SNP is lost to the Woo-Woo brigade. They’re welcome to it!Jul 24, 22:26
    • sarah on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “O/T but very relevant to the overall theme of why the SNP hasn’t made any progress in restoring Scotland’s independence…Jul 24, 21:53
    • Alf Baird on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““Sometimes I wonder where Scotland would be if we weren’t “colonised” Probably aroond aboot £150 billion a year better aff,…Jul 24, 21:29
    • Hatey McHateface on The Wheels Of Industry: ““No one is talking about expunging people” Oh yes they are. Just about weekly. You ignore it, Northy, because you…Jul 24, 20:48
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “All very well, sam, but what does Cuthbert know of Fanon, Cesaire, Memmi and the rest? That’s the yardstick by…Jul 24, 20:38
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Cheers, James! Although your obsession with my tackle does raise a few red flags. But hey, a child could see…Jul 24, 20:29
    • Southernbystander on The Wheels Of Industry: “Just needs a ‘like’ really as I cannot disagree with much. Just one thing, ‘recover’ is a bit of a…Jul 24, 20:16
    • sam on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Jim Cuthbert has a M.A. in mathematics and economics. A M.Sc. in mathematics and statistics and a D Phil in…Jul 24, 20:01
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Onlooker An analysis of Confused’s posts suggests you missed one: Confused’s parent’s home. How else to explain his recurring, extreme…Jul 24, 19:56
    • Dan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@ factchecker Thanks again for confirming the significant and negative predicaments Scotland endures whilst being in a Union with the…Jul 24, 19:27
    • Onlooker on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Lorncal says: “There has never, to my knowledge been a matriarchy in human history…” Wrong. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-ancient-traditions/ancient-cultures-matriarchal-society-0011588 https://historified.in/2024/12/24/matriarchy-a-historical-and-cultural-perspective/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/angela-saini-patriarchy-matriarchy-gender-equality https://www.maloriesadventures.com/blog/the-forgotten-matriarchal-societies-that-still-exist/Jul 24, 19:26
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Thank the Good Lord ScotGov doesn’t have control of North Sea licensing, eh? They’d have shut in the entire place…Jul 24, 19:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Good post, FC. You’re understanding why, outside of the UK, Scotland is as likely to split apart as it is…Jul 24, 19:10
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““tartaned up and kilted bourgeoisie strutting about” Crivens, help m’boab! Some cunning cant maist hae telt them they were aboot…Jul 24, 19:01
    • factchecker on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Nothing inadvertent almost it, Dan – just a statement of the obvious. Please name me a democratic union of formerly…Jul 24, 18:20
    • Dan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Well aye, guilty as charged Judge Mark, but when one’s talking about the proper sensible governance of an entire country…Jul 24, 18:17
    • Mark Beggan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““we have to grow our tax revenues…” You have to pay some Tax in the first place. Talking of which,…Jul 24, 18:17
    • 100%Yes on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Dan, The funny thing is the Scot hater who where born in Scotland, when abroad call themselves Scottish and when…Jul 24, 18:04
    • Mark Beggan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “For a wee guy you talk really big. You and the rest of the pure Yessers are going to do…Jul 24, 17:53
    • Dan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “^^^ That’s a very lame post, but I guess Mark jist tried to squeeze in as many derogatory digs as…Jul 24, 16:53
    • factchecker on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Fair enough, sam; but you are quoting the opinion of Jim Cuthbert, a single civil servant, albeit a well-informed one,…Jul 24, 16:40
    • Lorncal on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “I’m not into male-female rivalry, Mark/H McH. There has never, to my knowledge been a matriarchy in human history because,…Jul 24, 16:39
    • Lorncal on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Proselytise means to aggressively push your religion/ideology/whatever on to others, not to give them a wee lecture and a couple…Jul 24, 16:21
    • sam on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Factchecker says: “Please note: Analysts from the Scottish Parliament Information Centre concluded that the fiscal changes set out in the…Jul 24, 16:16
    • Dunx on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “And there was me thinking that you couldn’t sink any lower.Jul 24, 15:34
    • factchecker on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “100%Yes says: 24 July, 2026 at 1:36 pm Scotland had a referendum in 2014, I know the Unionist mention it…Jul 24, 15:24
    • Mark Beggan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Colonial. This word is getting thrown about here as if it has some sort of special powers. Just add “colonized”…Jul 24, 14:15
    • 100%Yes on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Scotland had a referendum in 2014, I know the Unionist mention it all the time. The day before the referendum…Jul 24, 13:36
  • A tall tale



↑ Top