The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Stable door “to be bolted soon”

Posted on July 20, 2012 by

As we predicted a few days ago, Sevco Scotland Limited has accepted the SFA’s condition of a 12-month transfer embargo in return for the company being allowed to take over the Association membership of the old Rangers Football Club PLC. In a novel twist, though, the SFA will not enforce the sanction until AFTER the closure of the summer transfer window on September 1st, allowing the Ibrox club to sign new players for the next six weeks, despite the embargo having been imposed in May.

Despite some of the wilder conspiracy theories circulating on the internet in recent days, the agreement was always going to happen, although we’re a little surprised (only a little, mind) at how blatantly the SFA has gone easy on the club – with over 40 players available to manager Ally McCoist even with the embargo in place, the deferral makes a mockery of the notion of punishment.

(An alert reader points out to us that the club will also be able to sign players, albeit briefly, in next summer’s transfer window, because a quirk of the calendar means it’ll be open for a day after Sevco’s embargo expires. There’s nothing to stop “Rangers” negotiating transfers next summer, then doing all the actual signings on September 2nd, so the punishment only really applies to the January 2013 window. In effect, rather than a 12-month ban it’s actually a four-week one.)

But Charles Green was never going to kick up much of a fuss about the embargo anyway, because it suits him fine. A clause in his sale agreement with Duff & Phelps allowed him to back out of the purchase of the Rangers assets if the club wasn’t playing in the top division of Scottish football, but he showed no interest in activating it even after Sevco FC was sent to SFL Division 3. The embargo does him no harm, because Mr Green doesn’t want to spend a penny more on New Rangers than he has to – he’s looking to sell it for a nice profit at the first available opportunity.

Still, putting off the punishment should enable Green to add a little strength and depth to the playing squad, with a few seasoned old pros good enough to do a turn in SFL3, at pretty minimal expense. He can still plead financial circumstances as an excuse for not making any major signings, and the ruling should minimise the chances of Sevco FC failing to get out of the bottom division at the first time of asking.

That said, we still wouldn’t actually put any money on the newco club completing the season. Our view remains that Green would be perfectly happy to see a second insolvency event and sell up, either to John Brown’s fantasy consortium or to a property developer. (There’s some fascinating new information on the latter here.)

As we’ve said for weeks, he can’t lose either way – if he somehow balances the books and gets the club on a firm financial footing, he can make a fortune selling it as a going concern or by punting shares to investors and fans. If he can’t – and in our view that’s still the more likely outcome – he can make plenty of money in a fire sale, given the ludicrously low price he was allowed to pay for the assets.

Basically, today’s agreement just postpones the ultimate decision day for Sevco Scotland to a few months down the line. There are still EBTs and dual contracts to worry about, and a whole raft of other potential issues. But finally we can state with a reasonable degree of certainty that there WILL be a football club, trading under the name “Rangers” and laying claim to that club’s history, playing professional football in Scotland next season. For how long, and how many people will be watching it, are questions still awaiting answers.

.

EDIT 8.02pm: The SFA has contacted us to state that in fact the summer 2013 transfer window WILL close on August 31st, despite that being a Saturday, and that Rangers will NOT be able to sign players on the following Monday.

As you can see, we’ve sought absolute clarification, and await further response.

3 to “Stable door “to be bolted soon””

  1. jimmyarab says:

    I think I’ve finally got my head around the whole Sevco / newco/ Rangers thingymajig.
    It’s actually quite easy and just requires a good bit of lateral thinking.
    Sevco will accept a ban on buying new players and this will have nothing to do with them being the old Rangers and getting the old ban. It’s just a ban that was put in place and they decided to accept it for no reason really. Just a made up ban put in place as a penalty for getting into SFL3. A penalty picked out of thin air and accepted by Sevco.  Errr I think that’s it.

    Reply
  2. Iain MacLachlan says:

    Doesn’t that mean they are in contempt of court? After all they ask the court if it was legal. The court said no and the SFA must not do it. Sevco said that’s nice, we won. Now they are sticking two fingers up at the court. I think if I had passed the original judgement, I would be a bit miffed at this turn of events.

    Reply
  3. redcliffe62 says:

    As the old Rangers is not yet liquidated surely the monies on transferred players who never committed to the new organisation should go to the creditors who are owed millions of pounds?
    Am I missing something?  

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,987 Posts, 1,252,550 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Bilbo on Still Time To Save Her: “Funny how there are sections of our society that has called on the Supreme court ruling about women to be…” Oct 13, 21:29
    • Bilbo on Still Time To Save Her: “These constant constitutional conversations are interesting when they are done on a civil basis but the reality is that they…” Oct 13, 21:11
    • Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “As you know Alf – the Supreme Court is a superior court to the inner house (before we get into…” Oct 13, 20:09
    • Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: ““on ending the sovereignty of the Parliament of the United Kingdom over Scotland” Ignorance and wishful thinking on the part…” Oct 13, 19:56
    • Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “Agreed Northcode – happy to let others decide, we’ve put our respective cases forward” Oct 13, 19:08
    • Northcode on Still Time To Save Her: “Thanks for the exchange. I think we’re reading the judgment differently, and that’s fine — the Supreme Court’s reasoning is…” Oct 13, 16:21
    • Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “Sorry Northcode – you need to go back and read the case again in detail. What you are saying there…” Oct 13, 15:49
    • Northcode on Still Time To Save Her: “I think there’s a misunderstanding here about what the Supreme Court actually decided. The Court did describe a referendum as…” Oct 13, 15:15
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “sarah, have you tried using the “Contact” button at top of page?” Oct 13, 14:58
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Frightening that people still have belief in the criminal justice system, isn’t it. Commit a serious sexual assault on a…” Oct 13, 14:52
    • sarah on Still Time To Save Her: “Rev, please re-post on here your article of 13th October 2024, “The Giant”. It will be a comfort to true…” Oct 13, 14:42
    • Anthem on Still Time To Save Her: “I hope you’re including Reform in that H.” Oct 13, 14:39
    • Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “@Northcode – again that is objectively untrue, the Supreme Court did not say that the proposed referendum could not be…” Oct 13, 13:54
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““curtailing them as the foreigners in their own Countries” There’s only one political party in with a shout of being…” Oct 13, 13:40
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Always amusing to see Confused praising the Norwegians whilst simultaneously lambasting those who believe defense is a key government priority.…” Oct 13, 13:22
    • Northcode on Still Time To Save Her: “For clarity. Holyrood cannot legislate a binding referendum. But Holyrood can hold a consultative referendum — the Supreme Court did…” Oct 13, 13:17
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: ““most people don’t … think the boat crossings bear any meaningful comparison to the actual Norman invasion; because it is…” Oct 13, 13:05
    • Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “Oh do shut up Alf. Your wishful thinking isn’t reality (again). Yeah, must’ve imagined all those crowds in London and…” Oct 13, 13:04
    • Alf Baird on Still Time To Save Her: “Turabdin makes a valid point, that “The Union is not «celebrated» in any way”. An wha but yersels wad want…” Oct 13, 12:49
    • Confused on Still Time To Save Her: “THE TELEGRAPH RUNS THE SAME STORY about 3 times a week – a budget “black hole” which means we should…” Oct 13, 12:39
    • Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “”because it is fucking stupid. Nicely summed up. TURABDIN gives Sixth Formers a bad name, and is attempting to write…” Oct 13, 12:28
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “It is with posts like this that you reveal your profound ignorance of the people of these islands Turabdin, how…” Oct 13, 12:15
    • Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: “@Dan As I have said to you before, disagreeing with someone or pointing at the paucity of their outlandish/inaccurate claims…” Oct 13, 12:02
    • Captain Caveman on Still Time To Save Her: ““You said you’ve paid millions in taxes yet you spend a lot of your time posting on a blog about…” Oct 13, 11:51
    • willie on Still Time To Save Her: “I see Neale Hanvey ex SNP and Alba MP has made a tweet about a period of up to seven…” Oct 13, 11:32
    • James Che on Still Time To Save Her: “Hatey, It needs all the peoples to not recognise the legality of the SNP and the devolved parliament from Westminster.…” Oct 13, 10:52
    • James Che on Still Time To Save Her: “It is not Scotland protecting Nicola Sturgeon or John Swinney, Englands Westminster parliament [ Scotland Act ] is under the…” Oct 13, 10:17
    • TURABDIN on Still Time To Save Her: “My last on the soi disant Bayeux Tapestry, not technically a tapestry but a refined piece of needlework by anglosaxon…” Oct 13, 10:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Then again, James, might is right. If you believe that the SNP government is illegal, then you should really live…” Oct 13, 09:51
    • Aidan on Still Time To Save Her: “The Scottish Parliament in Holyrood is a creation of the Scotland act 1998. It is not a successor to the…” Oct 13, 09:37
  • A tall tale



↑ Top