“In the fall of 2009, I found myself in Korea with a collection of suit–and-tie-wearing hotshots. On a panel sat Takatoshi Kato, then the deputy managing director of a powerful institution. Before the panel discussion, he gave us a rapid PowerPoint presentation showing his and his department’s economic projections for 2010, 201, 2012, 2013, and 2014.
“… Listening to Kato’s presentation, I could not control myself and flew into a rage in front of two thousand Koreans – I was so angry that I almost started shouting in French, forgetting that I was in Korea. I ran to the podium and told the audience that the next time someone in a suit and tie gave them projections for some dates in the future, they should ask him to show what he had projected in the past – in this case, what he had been forecasting for 2008 and 2009 (the crisis years) two to five years earlier, in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. They would then verify that Highly Venerable Kato-san and his colleagues are, to put it mildly, not very good at this predictionizing business. And it is not just Mr. Kato: our track record in figuring out significant rare events in politics and economics is not close to zero: it is zero.”
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Antifragile, p. 134, emphasis added.
why does the Treasury have an Office for Budgie Responsibility? If it keels over do we know the UK’s fucked?
It’s a bit like the ravens at the Tower of London (if they fly away, the crown falls and Britain with it). If the budgie flies up the leg of Aunty Mary’s drawers, Scotland will become independent. So they keep a close eye on it.
O/T I have only just seen this, which begs the question, ‘why do these things not circulate effectively?’
if you have not seen it, the 900 or so comments really lift the spirit.
Change
Not sure their methodology is as sophisticated as a crystal ball.
More like wetting the finger and holding up. When I was a researcher for the Central Research Unit of the old Scottish Office, the Treasury generally deemed a project’s budget to have been acceptable if it was within plus or minus 50% of forecast. I’m not sure if this is still the standard.
P.S. Can the BoE tell us what the exchange rate for sterling will be, against a basket of currencies, at the end of the month?
A good friend of mine works at the Bank of Finland. He’s got a Master’s degree in economics, he’s a smart guy, and great fun, but he will not understand (or admit) the fact that economic predictions are mostly informed guesses. They can theorisize a lot after the fact but their predictions have a fatal flaw: they assume people behave in a rational manner.
People do not behave in a rational manner (as amply demonstrated by the NO Better Together campaign).
Ask almost any flat/house buyer. The home they bought was the one (within their price range) they fell in love with. They’re not giving much thought to resale value etc. They just want that particular home, and often pay a bit more than they thought they could afford.
People buy all kinds of unnecessary junk just because it’s “nice to have them”, or even because “it’s nice to buy”. That’s not very rational, is it?
About 15 years ago my brother was thinking of setting up an online grocery shop in Lissabon (he lived there at the time) and I told him, it’s no go. Nobody would buy tomatoes without seeing and feeling them first. He and his business partner went on regardless, and the venture didn’t last long. They’d thought it maked perfect rational sense but forgot the irrational human behaviour.
So I take any economic predictions with a pinch of salt, and politically motivated predictions, like the OBR’s, with the whole salt cellar. OBR has been so wrong about oil&gas, I’d rather take the projections of the people who actually work in the industry. Their projections are wildly different from OBR’s. They just don’t get headlined or even reported in the Scottish MSM. McCrone, anyone?
Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.
TURABDIN on Just Good Friends: “FALSE FRIENDS. DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS fail when people with ability don’t have authority and people with authority don’t have ability What…” Jul 12, 12:45
Aidan on Just Good Friends: “Have you done any polling on how important the issue of the formation of the union in 1707 is to…” Jul 12, 12:13
Alf Baird on Just Good Friends: “Yes Hatey, if we “look at voting preferences against geographical areas in recent times” what we find is that the…” Jul 12, 11:49
Dan on Just Good Friends: “Things going on in Scotland… (Not that anybody here seems to give a shit) https://www.isp.scot/july-5th-july-11th-2025/” Jul 12, 10:23
Northcode on Just Good Friends: ““It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t…” Jul 12, 09:52
Northcode on Just Good Friends: “Naebody wid hae thocht hit possible tae uise ersecheeks tae blaff oot Inglis lees oan a keybuird an hae whit…” Jul 12, 08:38
James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Alf Baird. I apologise for late reply as busy thinking about re- locating.” Jul 12, 08:33
James Cheyne on Too Tight To Mention: “Alf Baird. ” Thus the old Scottish parliament members became [English parliamentarians]when they entered the continued English Westminster parliament resting…” Jul 12, 08:30
DaveL on Just Good Friends: “What the fuck are you talking about? What’s a ‘Da Dews’? I’ve never heard of it. While I’m here you…” Jul 12, 00:28
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: “I was confident you were going to morph onto Da Dews there, Confused, but you didn’t. Well done you. Bit…” Jul 11, 23:55
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: “@Alf I must hae colonised masel! Partition is a possibility if the kind of eejits currently ruling the roost at…” Jul 11, 23:45
Confused on Just Good Friends: “Deviants are blackmailable. Makes them easy to control. They go to “young leaders” shindigs all round the world and are…” Jul 11, 22:40
Dunx on Just Good Friends: “The SNP might also like to consider whether sixteen year old children are mature enough to vote in any future…” Jul 11, 22:01
Alf Baird on Just Good Friends: “” I think that any kind of extreme dehumanizing and/or hatred of any group of people is a form of…” Jul 11, 20:31
Mark Beggan on Just Good Friends: “Craig Murray? wasn’t he one of the Merry Pranksters in the Koolaid Acid Test.” Jul 11, 19:26
Lorn on Just Good Friends: “I absolutely agree on the alignment. Both groups utilize the exact-same tactics and their aims are very similar. The official…” Jul 11, 18:31
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: ““continually displayed abhorrent behaviour and used derogatory language to describe other fellow humans” Check out the synthetic outrage from Dan.…” Jul 11, 18:15
agent x on Just Good Friends: ““Scottish Government to consult on changing minimum marriage age THE Scottish Government has confirmed it will launch a consultation on…” Jul 11, 18:14
Alf Baird on Just Good Friends: “Manipulation, divide and rule, paternalistic colonialists, and finally partition when all else fails – all are part of the colonizer’s…” Jul 11, 18:12
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: “That’s blethers, TH, even for you. If we have a People’s Assembly to sack politicians who don’t do as the…” Jul 11, 17:56
Dan on Just Good Friends: “@Lorn says : “I think that any kind of extreme dehumanizing and/or hatred of any group of people is a…” Jul 11, 17:50
twathater on Just Good Friends: “And THAT is where a REAL people’s assembly would EXPOSE and destroy the REAL purpose of these deviants and perverts…” Jul 11, 17:39
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: “You still here, TH? I thought you were near the head of the queue for “assistance”.” Jul 11, 17:38
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: ““partly to make the Scottish government look good (just being different even if that amounted to nothing at all)” Damned…” Jul 11, 17:35
twathater on Just Good Friends: “I very seldom agree with anything you post Mark unionist Beggan but that comment is right on the money” Jul 11, 17:27
twathater on Too Tight To Mention: “OH no someone else has unveiled Bastard Tax MOAN’s real agenda,undermine and deride everything about Scotland and Scots and beg…” Jul 11, 17:21
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: “That’s a very fetching picture you conjure up there It’s 4-5 years until Chairman Murray returns from the UN…” Jul 11, 17:04
Lorn on Just Good Friends: “Hatey: you are absolutely correct. It was never about the women and girls. Always about the men in frocks. Personally,…” Jul 11, 17:03
Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: “@Lorn That’s another reasoned, eloquent and sane post from you. Beats me how you manage to post on here without…” Jul 11, 16:54
That and oil futures.
“Real Pea Souper in there.”
Have any of their forecasts been anywhere close to reality? Serious question as I have only ever seen their corrections Maybe I’ve missed something
Not sure their methodology is as sophisticated as a crystal ball.
That crystal ball should be replaced with a shite laden tombola.
Roll up! Roll up! Come & have a go on Gideon’s amazing shite filled tory tombola!!
“In the fall of 2009, I found myself in Korea with a collection of suit–and-tie-wearing hotshots. On a panel sat Takatoshi Kato, then the deputy managing director of a powerful institution. Before the panel discussion, he gave us a rapid PowerPoint presentation showing his and his department’s economic projections for 2010, 201, 2012, 2013, and 2014.
“… Listening to Kato’s presentation, I could not control myself and flew into a rage in front of two thousand Koreans – I was so angry that I almost started shouting in French, forgetting that I was in Korea. I ran to the podium and told the audience that the next time someone in a suit and tie gave them projections for some dates in the future, they should ask him to show what he had projected in the past – in this case, what he had been forecasting for 2008 and 2009 (the crisis years) two to five years earlier, in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. They would then verify that Highly Venerable Kato-san and his colleagues are, to put it mildly, not very good at this predictionizing business. And it is not just Mr. Kato: our track record in figuring out significant rare events in politics and economics is not close to zero: it is zero.”
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Antifragile, p. 134, emphasis added.
This fortune teller clearly doesn’t have the foresight of such esteemed members of society as Terry Kelly.
I know about canaries in coal mines but why does the Treasury have an Office for Budgie Responsibility? If it keels over do we know the UK’s fucked?
OBR
Old Bollocks Regurgitated.
why does the Treasury have an Office for Budgie Responsibility? If it keels over do we know the UK’s fucked?
It’s a bit like the ravens at the Tower of London (if they fly away, the crown falls and Britain with it). If the budgie flies up the leg of Aunty Mary’s drawers, Scotland will become independent. So they keep a close eye on it.
..O/T…..Mel Smith (Not the Nine Oclock News ), has just died of a heart attack
I think wee Geordie Osborne is underneath the table (standing up) kicking the wummin’s shins shouting “Wrong answer! That ball never fails for me!!”
O/T I have only just seen this, which begs the question, ‘why do these things not circulate effectively?’
if you have not seen it, the 900 or so comments really lift the spirit.
Change
Looking to the future, I wonder what slant the two Wallace TV shows planned for next year will take?
link to guardian.co.uk
@ HandandShrimp
Not sure their methodology is as sophisticated as a crystal ball.
More like wetting the finger and holding up. When I was a researcher for the Central Research Unit of the old Scottish Office, the Treasury generally deemed a project’s budget to have been acceptable if it was within plus or minus 50% of forecast. I’m not sure if this is still the standard.
P.S. Can the BoE tell us what the exchange rate for sterling will be, against a basket of currencies, at the end of the month?
A good friend of mine works at the Bank of Finland. He’s got a Master’s degree in economics, he’s a smart guy, and great fun, but he will not understand (or admit) the fact that economic predictions are mostly informed guesses. They can theorisize a lot after the fact but their predictions have a fatal flaw: they assume people behave in a rational manner.
People do not behave in a rational manner (as amply demonstrated by the NO Better Together campaign).
Ask almost any flat/house buyer. The home they bought was the one (within their price range) they fell in love with. They’re not giving much thought to resale value etc. They just want that particular home, and often pay a bit more than they thought they could afford.
People buy all kinds of unnecessary junk just because it’s “nice to have them”, or even because “it’s nice to buy”. That’s not very rational, is it?
About 15 years ago my brother was thinking of setting up an online grocery shop in Lissabon (he lived there at the time) and I told him, it’s no go. Nobody would buy tomatoes without seeing and feeling them first. He and his business partner went on regardless, and the venture didn’t last long. They’d thought it maked perfect rational sense but forgot the irrational human behaviour.
So I take any economic predictions with a pinch of salt, and politically motivated predictions, like the OBR’s, with the whole salt cellar. OBR has been so wrong about oil&gas, I’d rather take the projections of the people who actually work in the industry. Their projections are wildly different from OBR’s. They just don’t get headlined or even reported in the Scottish MSM. McCrone, anyone?