Scotland In Numbers
Posted on
February 17, 2026 by
Rev. Stuart Campbell
Cost of keeping vital rape crisis services in Glasgow operating: £500,000.
Amount of money wasted by the Scottish Government fighting and losing court cases to try to remove women’s rights: £1.14 million.
Angry yet?
It’s about time we gave up and let the bees take over
Cameron Lochiel says:
18 February, 2026 at 12:04 am
“It’s about time we gave up and let the bees take over“
=====
Are you sure? We already let the B s who take over the SG!
And I thought all candidates for the Raving Looney Party wore top hats.
Looks like they are wearing yellow and black rosettes these days.
Add in the money wasted in persecuting Salmond, paying off the man dressed as a woman that they put in charge of r*pe crisis Scotland and the costs associated with NHS Fife trying to justify a male doctor using a women’s changing room and we could have afforded 100 members of staff in the crisis centre.
Absolute Dicks Fannying around with tax payer’s hard earned taxes.
SG obviously hates women.
The true cost of supporting WOMEN. Heartbreaking. BTW where’s Brindley now??
When Scotland takes it on board and it eventually sinks in, that the parliament of Great Britain dissolved [Scotland ] one of its foundation creators in 1707 – collapsing and ending the parliament of Great Britain.
No parliament of Great Britain,
No political parliamentary union.
All this stupidity will come to an abrupt end also.
But it will continue as long as Scots keep pretending they have a Scottish parliament sent up to Scotland from the Westminter parliament of England.
That has no Scottish parliament in it.
Somebody better be a bit quicker to learn, cos I’am leaving here this week coming , and you’ll end up cursing yerselfs for being so slow to read the recorded records.and slow in letting the penny drop.
James Che says:
“I’am leaving here this week coming”
Please, dear God, let this be true !
Wow. I was never aware of your theory before. Come to think of it, I maybe have, but only about 5,000 times. It was boring and mince the first time and continues to be exactly the same.
I don’t think there will be too many people upset when you finally and thankfully depart Wings. Maybe Mr Swinney could declare a national holiday?
Well done Glasgow. Meanwhile the wizard book lady is still fully funding and operating the rape crisis centre Beira’s Place in Edinburgh, where traumatized women aren’t even at risk of meeting their assailant in a natty wig in the loos.
“Angry yet?”
Speaking on behalf of all those Sovereign Scots, many of them women, who intend to go out in May and vote SNP 1 & 2, the answer is a resounding “Meh”.
“Anybody see the problem yet?”
Anger doesn’t cover it. And at a time where rape and sexual assault is increasing in Glasgow. Scottish Government figures reported (for year to September 2025):
-Raoe and attempted rape: 513 – up from 440 the previous year and 340 in 2021 ie an increase of 50% in last 5 years.
-Sexual assaults reported as up 31% over the same 5 year period
Yet another example of this SNP government’s contempt for women when most vulnerable.
“Yet another example of this SNP government’s contempt for women when most vulnerable”
Like the statistics for ill health, unemployment, homelessness, law breaking, prison incarceration, etc. etc. ad infinitum, these numbers are meaningless without first being broken down along ethnic lines.
And that’s why the people in charge won’t ever do it.
The entire Great Replacement relies on us not seeing the way in which mass immigration from incompatible cultures is adversely affecting every metric that matters to ordinary people.
Women, men and Scotland were sacrificed in order to turn Scotland in to the first fully blown LGBTQ+ only Country.
Women have had to fund these court case themselves in order to make the SG see sense and abide by the law, which they have still to do.
So basically women winning these judgements against the SG. women have to pay the price with the shutting down of rape crisis unit in Glasgow.
What angers me even more, is why are women who support the SNP and are members of the SNP not up in arms about the SNP attitude toward heterosexual women.
People have a very short memory but after the referendum all of the MSM was constantly attacking Sturgeon and all of a sudden it all stopped, WHY? It’s simple she STOPPED Independence in its tracks so their wasn’t any reason to keep attacking her when she become part of Scotland problem, so why didn’t the wider Indy movement notice and take action.
All road in Scotland case doesn’t lead to Rome they all lead to Nicola Sturgeon and to make matters worse the SNP would elect her as FM again tomorrow and that’s a freighting thought.
“….women who support the SNP and are members of the SNP not up in arms about the SNP attitude toward heterosexual women.”
=========
Not just heterosexual women. Lesbians too. I have one such pub acquaintance with an earthy, colourful but highly amusing turn of phrase.
On this subject, however, the furious violence of her diatribes against trans activists would make a squad of Black Watch troopers blush.
An interesting article by Former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis on why the UK should not join the EU:
link to unherd.com
Varoufakis has been on an interesting journey, having switched sides since the EU referendum.
If nothing else, he knows at first hand how small countries that can’t or won’t toe the line fare under Brussels rule.
HINT: Not very well.
Of course, Scotland’s putative membership of the EU as an “independent” nation has been academic for near 4 years now.
But with Starmer increasingly flirting with rejoining as a last gasp, final chance for him to save his premiership, the EU question is climbing to the head of the agenda.
The second time around, the UK won’t get the cut price membership the “hated Thatcher” insisted on last time. And for those Scots eternally claiming that it’s Scotland’s colonially raped wealth that underpins the UK economy, maybe even they will be able to do the math and see how Scotland will be footing the bill for the UK’s seat at the Brussels table.
Not that that will stop them enthusing about once more being able to walk through the EU lane at passport control. Joined Up thinking doesn’t go that far.
Again , the answer is staring the SNP in the face, EFTA , but again their intransigence kicks in and it’s their way or the highway.
It’s all about getting the cult to believe impossible things.
Varoufakis’ journey is one I’ve gone on too.
Interesting, though you have to subscribe to read the bulk of it. I am in broad agreement with him. I voted remain but had some sympathy with the old leftist objections to the EU and they seem more pertinent than ever now. If there were another chance to choose, I would be very torn now.
There is no doubt that leaving the EU has harmed the country economically though, so it isn’t black and white. And ironically it has significantly increased immigration from countries outside Europe, a backfire for everything UKIP were on about. Who would they rather have – hardworking Poles or ‘refugees’ or ‘needed’ workers from North Africa? They would say neither I am sure (though with no real strategy to replace the migrant workforce) and Farage would never take any responsibility for that, of course, because when he has to face legitimate tough questions, his apparent honest, straight-talking persona disintegrates, and he simply belittles and insults the questioner, demeaning whatever organisation they work for, just like Trump.
I do not think Starmer is going to try and take GB back into the EU – he would need a referendum anyway (which may well be lost) and it would almost certainly guarantee a Reform government and the ruination of Labour (I mean he has proved himself the maker of some pretty bad calls recently but I think that one is beyond even him).
On the other hand, Starmer is trying to re-forge some old and useful ties with the EU which I agree with – there is no reason to not look at those in the interests of the country, especially of its younger people. It does not mean re-joining the EU and that kind of ultra-hard Brexit mentality that says it is, is purely ideological and against the interests of the country.
“no real strategy to replace the migrant workforce”
I suggest you type “how many UK citizens rely entirely on benefits” into a search engine.
The starting point for developing a real strategy can arguably be found from consideration of the answer to that question.
Around 35 million Brits get more from the state than they put in. So half the population is, to a greater or lesser extent, living off the sweat of the other half.
Would it be too much to ask for the country to declare a National Contributor Public Holiday for one day a year?
All the workers could have a day off while the grifters put in a shift. It would only be for one day, FFS! The snowflakes would have 364 other days to get over it.
This makes good sense, in theory.
Did you ever see that programme where a Lincolnshire farmer was asked to employ ‘willing’ unemployed locals to pick soft fruit on his farm rather than relying so much on migrant workers (who had traditionally done it for years – the locals in Boston were always complaining about them ‘taking our jobs’)? The results were as expected – they couldn’t hack it. Only one of them did good and was permanently employed, the rest drifted off of on their own accord (too hard, start too early, hours too long, conditions cold or too hot and unpleasant, pay not enough), or were ‘let go’. The migrant workers were miles better and for them, the pay was still good compared to what they might earn at home.
Tied up in all of that are loads of issues but if, say, the unemployed were more or less required to do this kind of work or lose benefits, one of the major problems is that they would be useless.
Absolutely, H. McH. That ship has sailed. It would be economic and social and political madness to resurrect the EU for us or even for the UK, as a whole. The thing is, the SNP and much of the independence movement is wedded to this idea of rejoining the EU without seeing that most of the ‘progressive’ and financial mess we are in today is attributable directly to the EU. I voted Remain. Never again. I once voted SNP. Never again.
Spain has just granted citizenship to around one million illegals.
Thus effectively unleashing them on all the other EU member countries.
And guaranteeing that in a very few years, Spain will once more have another million illegals.
One of the more annoying aspects to this lunacy is that there are still people referring to it as the Great Replacement THEORY.
Insider,
Your ignorance on the matter must be bliss, to wantingly work to remain ignorant is your own wish.
One of the reasons I am retiring from Rev Stu’s site.
There are very little left that had held that old enthusiasm to learn more than what they told, as the people that were on this site up till 2015.
Nowadays its just reactionary posts to headlines that are waited on for Stu’s site to provide, like gold fish waiting to fed a the top of the tank.
There are but a few left of the old calibre.where everyone gave and shared their information and other went to look it up to see if it was true,
Without AI corrupted.
STU,
I think you were a brave man with a lot of integrity and tenacity to come through all that applied pressure constantly placed on you by the establishment.and their media.
You’re excellent journalism was unquestionable
Thank you Stu, for being there at the beginning to give Scotland a voice,
Anyone who’s been critical of Sturgeon/SNP has been dealt with by a fist of Jury. This is indicative in these groups women, Cybernats, Keyboard warriors, Mark Hirst and Alex salmond to name but a few have all dealt in a manner of an authoritarian style of justice. She then went out of her way to destroy the Independence movement only because like these others in these groups we decide to question the SNP actions under Sturgeon reign and make no mistake Sturgeon is still in charge of the SNP and running Scottish government policy.
I would presume people within the SNP high hierarchy quickly realised it was a mistake to question Sturgeon on anything she was involved with, just ask one barrister.
The British state didn’t need to turn Sturgeon she did it herself as soon as we the Independence movement question her actions was a huge mistake and now Scotland is paying the price along with these other groups.
“The British state didn’t need to turn Sturgeon she did it herself”
Not quite. Postcolonial theory tells us the colonizer aye has a role to play in a colonial society, for “without the colonizer there would be no colonized” (Memmi).
A colonized people do not live in a vacuum, their actions are always influenced by the needs, interests and threats of the dominant colonizing power:
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
Alf,
It is worth noting the role of King James I and VI. He used Scots to try to seize Lewis while simultaneously using Scots to colonise Ireland.
Border Reivers like the Armstrongs ( many of whom are to be found in Fermanagh) were given the choice of being hanged or moved to Ireland.
Those that moved to the North of Ireland, dispossessed the Irish of their land. They were described by their own Ministers who went with them as “the scum of the earth”.
They became and remain, a buffer between the English elite and the Irish.
The GFA will not allow the decolonisation of Ireland without the agreement of the people of NI.
I find the fact that Neil Armstrong could claim descent from Scottish Border Reiver ancestors on his father’s side is one that makes me immensely proud of my country and my people.
Of course, the ideological purists, with which the Indy movement is infested, will always find something to greet and gurn about.
Always, without exception.
Hatey,
The 1801/1802 –
United kingdom parliament of England and Ireland, agreement, thats “Starmers parliament”
No Scottish parliament in it since 1707
The UKG could shutdown Holyrood today and blame the SNP and lets be honest they would have a good reason for doing it, but they won’t because the SNP isn’t a threat anymore to the UK or the British government.
She kept us all dangle on a very short piece of string, on the believe she was going to bring Independence when she knew it was never going to happen.
The loss to the movement was Alex and Iain Lawson to name but a few, but Nicola Sturgeon departure is a welcome blessing but not all see it.
Indeed , a massive loss.
100%Yes,
If they had gone down the route in the beginning of Recognising Scotland was dissolved from the treaty of union and hence the parliament of Great Britain in 1707,
The other court cases could never and would never came about,
The faux way in which the Scotland was supposedly in a treaty was the way out without begging the Anglo- Irish parliament for referendums or section 30s
As it was then and is now today provided full with recorded historical evidence wrote by Westminster parliaments own fair hand.
Alex, joanna Cherry, and SNP to name but a few, delayed Scottish independence because of the route they choose to take, and created further problems for themselves
Asking, begging for permission from the Anglo- Irish parliament was never going to freely say yes.
Proving you were not in that particular parliament because you were was dissolved in 1707 was much easier.
Disgusting
That is a huge lawyers ‘welfare’ bill. One million plus on that one issue alone. Is there anything practical to show for it, other than lots of words on sheets of paper all now bound for that great cupboard in the sky?
There is just that burgeoning exclusive class of people who dont actually produce anything for society and feed parasitically on the easy touch that is the fat cadaver of the bureaucratic State. They remind me of that other coterie calling themselves politicians. Come to think of it, they are just the same coin.
‘Is there anything practical to show for it…?’ Yes. The right people still get invited to the right dinner parties.
Well done J K Rowling.
Beira’s Place still functions in Edinburgh. It is funded by Ms Rowling.As well as Ms Rowling, the Board of Beira includes former prison governor Rhona Hotchkiss, previous Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont, GP Margaret McCartney, and director of For Women Scotland, Susan Smith.
I think the Rape Crisis Centre is also open in Edinburgh.
Brindley departed her post recently and a new head, Alev Taylor is in post.
Here’s a stick that could be used to beat every politician into oblivion, whether it’s the SNP (we hate women), Labour (we hate women too, unless they’re wearing a hijabe), Tory (we don’t care), or Reform (we especially don’t care). But will it?
Alternatively, maybe if they just tried to “Be nice” a little harder, then everything will be just fine.
Partly, it’s spreading monies too thinly and partly punishment. I had a fair inkling that, if the UKSC Ruling was applied anywhere, all women’s services would be made to suffer. The facts are that women receive a far smaller proportion of overall UK and Scottish income for female-based services, and that covers health, as well. I used to have the figures for this, but can’t find them now.
The menz in frocks were siphoning off women’s allocations by entering female spaces and services right across the board, including sports. Where these services were run by charities, this was a scandalous misuse of funds because all charities have constitutions that set out in detail what any funds must be used for and what they must not be used for, and any deviation without sanction is fraud, with committee members being personally liable.
The same applies to government funding, and the SG, if it sanctioned the access of men into rape crisis centres, without permission of parliament, it was breaching its own rules and in breach of the law (both civil and criminal). If the SG has any legal advisers, and if those legal advisers advise properly according to the law, and the SG continues to breach the law, then it is acting ultra vires – beyond its powers. That can lead to the fall of the SG.
It is utterly sickening that women and women’s groups have to take the SG to court, using donations from the public, just to try and enforce existing law, the aim of the SG (and the UKG, in other cases) is to exhaust women’s patience, resources and determination. Basically, both governments are at war with women in Scotland and in the UK. That is the bare truth. We need to turn our attention to charities and to the big global companies behind the ‘trans’ lobby and other ‘woke’ enterprises that are sinking our country and the UK. No use applying that to just Scotland because the UKG is every bit as bad, and UK law applies to us, too, while we are part of the Union.
@ Lorna– I think that we need to recognize that Westminster prevented the GRA. Also nurses in England seem to have been more successful than our Sandy Peggie at getting justice.
we are doing so badly, there’s a waiting list for the r4ping these days
link to archive.ph
– maybe they could open up a branch in govanhill, to be close to the service users; vertical integration I think this is, as an adjunct to horizontal penetration
if I was a young woman these days I would always carry a wee strip of bacon to wipe my fanny with in case these ethnics got a bit curious and declared a sexual emergency; owning a dog is also a good idea. Or you can always carry a koran and as they approach, hold it up with the cigarette lighter fired … any closer and the bad poetry of a paedophile gets it. If they charge, burn the koran and make your escape while they attempt to put the flames out.
– creative solutions, its what its all about. Thinking of which, dual use items; I laughed one time about this lad getting huckled one friday night down at the hamilton palace after closing – the cops picked him up carrying a chisel; his brief, and I would like this guys number, argued successfully that the young man was an apprentice joiner, the chisel was a tool of his trade and he had forgotten he was so eager for his night out … (this is why we love the law)
Old gamers will remember Fallout, and if you went for a melee build, the best weapon to have was the “combat chainsaw”, a small handheld skin shredder. Amazingly, you can buy these on amazon, and they can just about fit into a big handbag. Better than seeing your daughter enriched (front and back) by diverse gentlemen, who may grow up to be brain surgeons, concert pianists and theoretical physicists (says the BBC). Just make sure you get her registered as an apprentice tree surgeon.
I always think that solutions do exist to any problem (unless mathematically impossible), but its just we wont do it as we dont like the solutions.
– there is something odd about the “mutilated cock”-crowd; it sends you nuts. Consider – rotherham – p4ki rape gangs, and now the big story right now – “epstein island” – i.e. jewish r4pe gangs (with added blackmail), all about “schtupping the shiksa”.
Quite an amusing post, Confused. As always, a quibble:
“the big story right now”
Naw. The voracious news cycle has moved on. Check out the MSM. Of course, there will be future flare ups, but for now, the long term click-bait game plan is best served by allowing apathetic reader’s numbness to wear off. We can’t remain permanently outraged, jealous, envious, etc.
OK, 2 quibbles:
So what if Epstein was Jewish? It’s just your bigotry that attempts to make that a relevant fact.
Trafficking in sex slaves has been going on forever. As with the slaves you would want only for doing back breaking manual work, the market has long since been sewn up by the adherents to the religion of peace.
ACADEMIC: ‘ERASING BIOLOGICAL SEX FROM RESEARCH UNDERMINES ACADEMIA’
A prominent academic has urged his colleagues to stand against the “quiet disappearance” of biological sex in research data collection.
Sir Anthony Finkelstein, who is President of City St George’s, University of London, warned that replacing the default category of biological sex with gender identity causes “whole domains of policy analysis” to become “weaker and less reliable”.
The academic, who was previously a Government advisor on national security, made the comments during a discussion about Professor Alice Sullivan’s recommendations on accurate data collection of sex and gender identity.
‘LONG-TERM DANGER’
Sir Anthony stated: “In recent years, there’s been growing unease about recording sex as a basic variable, and pressure — sometimes explicit and sometimes ambient — to replace it with or collapse it into gender identity.”
The academic noted that although biological sex has become “politically uncomfortable”, there is “a long-term danger of governing the degraded data and discovering too late that we are not describing the world we inhabit”.
He emphasised that “sex correlates strongly with capital, health, mortality, fertility, violence, incarceration, employment, caring responsibilities”.
Sir Anthony noted that gender identity “may be an important subject study”, but “not as a substitute for a foundational demographic category”.
BULLYING
Last year, university staff and students across the UK reported suffering “extreme personal consequences” for upholding the reality of biological sex.
A report on ‘Barriers to research on sex and gender’, led by Professor Sullivan, analysed 130 responses to a call for evidence by University College London.
Overall, 58 per cent reported “self-censorship and chilling effects”, followed by “bullying, harassment and ostracism” at 42 per cent, and “barriers to publication” at 39 per cent.
(The Christian Institute, 18 Feb 2026)
link to christian.org.uk
“58 per cent reported “self-censorship and chilling effects”, followed by “bullying, harassment and ostracism” at 42 per cent, and “barriers to publication” at 39 per cent”
What a coincidence, Fearghas.
Exactly 139% responded No when asked if they understand percentages.
Could it be the same people?
It is Stalinism/totalitarianism, Fearghas, and deliberately so pour encourager les autres. I think we really need to ask what is behind all of this stuff? Apparently, the dark web is now awash with PDfiles, so much so that one police officer has said that all the prisons in the UK, emptied of their current inmates, would not be able to hold them. Another officer does not believe that many of these men are true PDfiles, but are pushing the boundaries to breaking point. Rapes and sexual assaults have increased massively in the past few years, too, and not all the blame can be laid at the door of young men from places where women rank below the average beasts in the field. The picture is the same everywhere, in every part of the globe, in every race and ethnicity. Something big is happening.
It has to be internet access to a large extent, extreme pornography and a gradual slackening off of the rules around sexual assaults and women and children. However, it will never be enough just to shake our heads and say, isn’t this awful? It is way beyond time that we started to ask what is actually behind it all because something most definitely is. Some major shift has taken place, and it seems to have been pushed by humans rather than evolution. Part of the answer lies, of course, in the fact that women and children (and animals, because, apparently, they, too, are being used in bestiality in far greater numbers than ever before) are much more vulnerable than males.
It has always been a source of mystification to me that males have so much more strength on average, that they are so much driven by testosterone, but evolution in primates is what it is. It doesn’t, though, make sense for human females to be so much weaker and less able to protect themselves and their children (although they are not perfect in this area, either). On every other level, except madness and genius, men and women are more or less equal. Only physical strength really gives men any advantage. I wonder whether evolution will, one day, even the odds? Just a thought.
I suspect that power-hungry, porn-driven men in the tech and pharmaceutical industrial complex are trying to push evolution themselves. Will they come a cropper? I suspect so. Just when you think you have conquered Mother Nature, she comes back and sinks her teeth in your nethers. Jeffrey Epstein has learned that lesson – if he’s still around, that is, and not trying to wheedle his way out of the lower levels of Hell with Ghislaine in tow.
Lorna Campbell says:
18 February, 2026 at 1:48 pm
“It is Stalinism/totalitarianism”
=========
You perfect analogy. Under Stalin, the charlatan geneticist Lysenko’s pseudoscience was allowed, for ideological reasons, to replace the genuine science of the great Gregor Mendel.
The consequence of applying his theories to grain breeding caused the deaths of millions in both Stalin‘s USSR and Mao’s China.
It defies belief that academic science should replace the scientific category of sex in important databases with gender, again under pressure from a fashionable ideology.
Unless Professor Sullivan is heeded, the West’s own Lysenko style catastrophe is, I fear, slowly underway.
(For the arithmetically illiterate, professor Sullivan‘s percentages are not of mutually exclusive categories – hence the failure to total 100%)
Lorna, I invariably read and appreciate your contributions.
The perennial question in this instance would seem twofold: “Are there any moral absolutes?” If so, “What is their origin?”
Okay, that no doubt has been the basis for verbal and written treatises and pontifications since the beginning of humanity. So I pose the conundrum here respectfully but rhetorically, this not being the place for subtle elaborations on the imponderable. My own view, folk will have picked up by now, is Dooyeweerdian Christian.
However, for general interest, the issues are briefly focussed on in this description by Justin Brierley of an exchange he had with Richard Dawkins in 2008. Brierley writes:
« MORALITY
« Perhaps the most controversial point in my interview with Dawkins was the admission on the fact that his naturalism does not allow for moral absolutes. It was this area of whether a fixed morality exists, or whether belief in the atheistic evolution of morality commits us to arbitrary moral beliefs, which for me was the most interesting part of my conversation with Dawkins. Here is the nub of our conversation on the audio in this respect:
———
Exchange:
JB: When you make a value judgement don’t you immediately step yourself outside of this evolutionary process and say that the reason this is good is that it’s good. And you don’t have any way to stand on that statement.
RD: My value judgement itself could come from my evolutionary past.
JB: So therefore it’s just as random in a sense as any product of evolution.
RD: You could say that, it doesn’t in any case, nothing about it makes it more probable that there is anything supernatural.
JB: Ultimately, your belief that rape is wrong is as arbitrary as the fact that we’ve evolved five fingers rather than six.
RD: You could say that, yeah.
———
(Brierley writes) « This admission from Dawkins (although as you hear on the audio it’s a bit of a mumbled admission) is somewhat controversial and something that I don’t think the debate brought out as strongly as John Lennox may have wished.
« Obviously the context is important – Dawkins is not saying that “rape is ok” – he believes it is wrong from within his evolutionary perspective. However, he does admit that the belief itself is essentially arbitrary given that we could have evolved different morals – and that there can be no overarching moral fact that rape is wrong, as this would suggest values etc. that eclipse his strict naturalism. »
link to bethinking.org
Lorna
HG Well’s “The Time Machine” appears to have accurately predicted the rise of the dissolute degenerate androgynous Eloi.
Evolution; Well’s time traveller’s jaunt further into the future saw the next “evolution” to hopping hare types..
“For the arithmetically illiterate, professor Sullivan‘s percentages are not of mutually exclusive categories”
Sez you!
For the simply illiterate, perhaps you could point out where in Fearghas’ original post it says that.
Perhaps, having failed in that challenge, you could tell us, based on your superior knowledge, what percentage of the 130 responses reported no consequences whatsoever.
I’ll wait, because this should be good.