The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Minding your own business

Posted on April 05, 2012 by

Pretty much every newspaper and media source ran with a particular statistic as their headline from the published conclusions of the UK government's consultation on the independence referendum. More or less everywhere led with the 75% of respondents who wanted a single Yes/No question, which is mildly curious because it's not really news – the stated preference of every party and MSP in the Scottish Parliament, and the Scottish Government itself, is already for a single question.

The Secretary of State for Scotland loudly proclaimed that the consultation had therefore delivered a mandate to get on with the referendum on the UK government's terms, meaning a single question as quickly as possible and no votes for 16/17-year-olds. But the respondents to the consultation actually presented a much more significant demand: a similarly large majority of them – 72% – expressed the view that what they really wanted the UK government to do was butt the hell out altogether and give the Scottish Government the power to get on with it.

For some reason, Moore and the Scottish media weren't so keen to draw attention to that particular finding. But it would appear to mean that the electorate overwhelmingly want the Scottish Parliament – the only body which has an actual democratic mandate to hold a referendum on independence at all – to handle the entire matter without interference from Moore and his coalition colleagues.

We look forward, therefore, to the Scottish Secretary and his chums – having made their point and stated their views – keeping their noses out from now on, waiting for the Scottish Government to conclude its own (far more popular) consultation, and make its own decisions about the number and wording of the questions, the timing of the vote and the extent of the franchise. As democrats, we're sure they'll happily comply with the wishes of the people.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Doug Daniel

Another figure that seems to have been missed (or maybe it hasn't – I've been ill the past few days so I'm not as on top of the news as usual) is that 71% of those who responded to the question on the voting franchise agree with the Scottish Government (and the UK government, apparently) that it should be based on residency, like the Scottish Elections, rather than the Westminster election franchise. Only 4% back the ridiculous idea of letting everyone in the UK vote on it. So, assuming the Scottish Government's consultation backs this up, then hopefully those two particularly pathetic arguments can be put to bed.
 
Not only that, but it shows opinion is completely divided over votes at 16 (44% for, 47% against – although they still manage to point out that "more" were against it), so it will be very interesting to see what the figure is in the Scottish Government's consultation (i.e. the REAL consultation).
 
One final observation – responses from the public are as moronic as you might expect. I hope they're better in the real consultation; and true to form, Westminster are excellent at spinning neutral responses to sound like they back their point.
 
Oh, and the fact that A Boyd Tunnock of the outspokenly unionist Tunnocks (not sure why Salmond continues to offer people caramel wafers with their tea) thinks the referendum needs to be as quick as humanly possible does not hold much sway with me. And I don't need to know how fat he is either ("As a reasonably large employer in Scotland…") I also don't care about members of the public parroting lines they've heard on the news about "the damaging uncertainty" – this adds nothing.
 
A final point – look at the list of respondents, and look for the political parties. SNP (various branches), Scottish Labour (wow, Jim Sillars' defunct party has been resurrected?) and Scottish Liberal Democrats. No Greens, no SSP, and most importantly, the only Tory response is from the London Scottish Conservative Club.
 
So the Scottish Tories didn't even respond to their own consultation. Unbelievable.

Tony Boaks

There was a far easier way of discrediting the UK consultation. Less than 3000 responses in a country of 5 million is 0.06%. So any figure of 75% is 75% of 0.06% of the population: 0.045%.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,693 Posts, 1,209,272 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • George Ferguson on Poisoning The Unwell: “The Poisoner April 30 2021. Towards the end of the article Sturgeon poisoned the Yes movement to the extent the…Jan 19, 11:18
    • Dan on The same old tricks: “Aye, how hard can it be in this modern tech filled world to simply allocate genuine numbers to actual amounts…Jan 19, 10:39
    • G m on Poisoning The Unwell: “Aye, same here Marie. I always thought it had the feel of a holiday home in a strange location for…Jan 19, 10:31
    • Marie on Poisoning The Unwell: “I’ve always found that Uddingston house very strange. It minds me of a stage set – bought for the purposes…Jan 19, 10:22
    • Dan on The same old tricks: “Could be but who knows for sure. Over the years there has been a steady stream of btl posters that…Jan 19, 10:12
    • G m on Poisoning The Unwell: “The argument of incompetent government goes both ways.Jan 19, 09:47
    • Mia on The same old tricks: ““For somebody that is often such a pedant in matters of btl law discussions, it’s odd that you should then…Jan 19, 09:45
    • Dan on The same old tricks: “For somebody that is often such a pedant in matters of btl law discussions, it’s odd that you should then…Jan 19, 09:39
    • Mia on The same old tricks: “Scotland’s parliament can be recalled at any time. The only thing we need is for our so called “Scotland’s” MP…Jan 19, 09:35
    • PacMan on Poisoning The Unwell: “She’s plainly under the influence. Any decent journalist worth their salt would follow this up.Sturgeon can’t be permitted to just…Jan 19, 09:34
    • Mia on The same old tricks: “I clicked on the link and this is what it says: “In the ONS’s Regional Accounts, the UK continental shelf is not allocated…Jan 19, 09:08
    • Aidan on The same old tricks: “No the two parliaments cannot be recalled, the last representatives of those parliaments have long since died and the constitutional…Jan 19, 08:17
    • gregor on Poisoning The Unwell: “BBC (2025): Murrell property sale ban during police probe: “The former SNP chief executive and recently-separated husband of Nicola Sturgeon…Jan 19, 08:12
    • Aidan on The same old tricks: “I’ve literally just posted the link above showing the two ways GERS accounts for oil and gas revenue (I.e. population…Jan 19, 07:39
    • yoon scum on Poisoning The Unwell: “I think that the best that could happen to scotland be for a competent Scottish government be that yoon or…Jan 19, 05:11
    • Mia on The same old tricks: “Ahh!!! GERS, that magic con-trick with the power to apply the miracle of the fish and the bread in reverse…Jan 19, 02:16
    • Mia on The same old tricks: “Hopefully the local authority will do something about it. Can you get other neighbours to back you up on this…Jan 19, 02:15
    • Mia on The same old tricks: “Thank you.Jan 19, 02:03
    • Mia on The same old tricks: ““The two parliaments who enacted the treaty no longer exist” But they can be recalled. The only thing that is…Jan 19, 01:35
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The same old tricks: “Thanks Mia. And for all your own very helpful and encouraging contributions. I would add that, since I can no…Jan 19, 00:29
    • sarah on Poisoning The Unwell: “I couldn’t find that article by the search button. Could you remember which year it was so that I can…Jan 18, 23:22
    • sarah on Poisoning The Unwell: “I missed that bit about the registering of judges’ interests being stopped by Sturgeon. Now why would she do that?…Jan 18, 23:07
    • Mia on Poisoning The Unwell: “Thank you Sarah. The grousebeater article is most interesting. Mmm. 1996/97 is quite close to the devolution referendum for comfort,…Jan 18, 22:59
    • Aidan on The same old tricks: “The two parliaments who enacted the treaty no longer exist, and haven’t existed for hundreds of years, so the problem…Jan 18, 22:47
    • Mia on The same old tricks: ““but in your fantasy, there is no way of amending the UK’s constitutional structure to give effect to that termination”…Jan 18, 22:32
    • Aidan on The same old tricks: “GERS provides figures for oil and gas revenues on both an illustrative geographic share and a population share basis. Why…Jan 18, 22:24
    • Dan on The same old tricks: “May be a helpful explanation of the asymmetry within the union. https://consoc.org.uk/the-constitution-explained/devolution/ I used to have an article bookmarked but…Jan 18, 22:16
    • sarah on Poisoning The Unwell: “Hard to believe, isn’t it? LOLJan 18, 22:10
    • Aidan on The same old tricks: “That should read “administrative structures of the EU”Jan 18, 21:55
    • Aidan on The same old tricks: “Treaties can be terminated for the purposes of international law (I note that is one legal principal that you do…Jan 18, 21:36
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
468
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x