The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Lamont offers Scots [BLANK] tomorrow

Posted on January 31, 2012 by

We're supposed to live in an age where politicians are trained to within an inch of their lives by media advisers, in order that they can spout bland pre-programmed soundbites about any given subject at a second's notice. (With the infamous nadir of the phenomenon being represented by Ed Miliband's toe-curling broken-robot impression at the time of the public-sector strikes.) So perhaps we should be happy on the rare occasions when we discover a couple of elected representatives still willing to appear like clueless idiots in front of the public.

First came a few comments in the Scotsman from the leader of the SNP group on Glasgow City Council, Alison Hunter. With the SNP hoping to take control of the Labour stronghold this May – or at least deprive Labour of its majority – she was asked which policies she would seek to implement if her party pulled off such a titanic feat. Hunter's scarcely-believable and less-than-inspiring response was "I haven’t thought about that yet. Actually, I’m not an out-there leader. I’m a team leader. So we haven’t actually thought about that yet."

Before you ask, we have no idea what the difference between an "out-there leader" and a "team leader" is either, and we imagine Ms Hunter will soon be leaving SNP HQ with a well-skelped erse and a disinclination to say anything quite so stupid out loud ever again. In her defence, however, we suppose we could offer up the fact that she's highly unlikely to ever have to consider such a scenario – with Labour currently holding 45 seats (out of 79) to the SNP's 22, even denying Labour a majority in Glasgow this time round would be a huge and significant achievement for the Nats. Winning outright or even plurality control this year is surely beyond its reach.

We're not sure what Johann Lamont's excuse is, though.

Lamont is the leader of the opposition in the Scottish Parliament, with ambitions to be the First Minister of Scotland (go on, picture it). She leads a party which has formed the government as recently as five years ago. She's the figurehead (in Scotland, certainly, albeit largely by default) of the No campaign for the independence referendum – the side which is starting out well in the lead. In that latter battle at least, you'd have to say that she had a plausible chance of victory.

Her much-asserted position is that she and her party oppose both the status quo and independence. Lamont insists that Scotland needs greater devolution, but that (for some reason) the middle option cannot be part of the referendum. Devolution, says Labour's leader, is a "separate path" (does that make her a separatist?) rather than a point on a line, and the people of Scotland must first reject independence before they can be allowed greater powers within the UK.

So what ARE these powers with which Lamont hopes to tempt the electorate? They must be pretty attractive, you'd think, if they're going to persuade Scots to vote for the deeply unpopular status quo in autumn 2014 and trust Labour to create a better alternative at a later date. So when Lamont stood beside Ed Miliband in Glasgow yesterday and was asked to outline her vision for the future of Scotland, her reply – as reported by the Guardian – was all the more startling:

"Given that Labour lost the election last year, it would be presumptuous to have a firm answer to that now. [We want] to consult on this, particularly with business."

Sorry? Lamont's already-opaque position has been derided in the press previously as offering "jam tomorrow", but it appears that now she isn't even committing to anything that specific. Is it in fact jam that Labour's offering us tomorrow? Is it marmalade? Peanut butter? Economy lemon curd? Low-fat vegetable-oil spread? Week-old cat-vomit? In fact, are we getting any toast at all? (And when, actually, is tomorrow?)

Labour recently spent 14 months in the Calman Commission, formulating (alongside the Lib Dems and Tories) its official views on how to move forward with Scottish devolution. The outcome of these lengthy deliberations was the toothless, vague and increasingly doomed-looking Scotland Bill. So what are we to believe? That Labour was holding back on its true thoughts about constitutional developments all that time, but has now forgotten what they were and has to start again?

Lamont's response is an absolutely extraordinary display of both intellectual bankruptcy and arrogance. What does losing the election have to do with Labour's position on the constitution? Isn't that supposed to be a matter of principle? Why do you need to "consult", and who with, to know what you believe in? Why is it business, rather than Labour members or voters, who get to have the biggest influence on where Labour stands? How do you know that independence is the wrong choice if you don't even know what your alternative is?

We were distinctly unimpressed with Alison Hunter last week, but Johann Lamont occupies a position of far greater responsibility and has fumbled that responsibility much more dismally.  She might not have noticed, but the referendum campaign has started. If she still doesn't even know what she's arguing for, we're not sure how she hopes to persuade the people of Scotland.

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 01 08 14 10:24

    The Eternal Promise of Jam Tomorrow | We'll never be fooled again!

4 to “Lamont offers Scots [BLANK] tomorrow”

  1. Rolf says:

    "Vote Labour, go nowhere."
    They can have that slogan for free. Any more and I'll invoice them.

    Reply
  2. Subrosa says:

    Don't encourage Ms Lamont and her colleagues to form a strategy please. The independence cause is profiting well from her current stance.

    Reply
  3. An Duine Gruamach says:

    How do you know that independence is the wrong choice if you don't even know what your alternative is?
    Brilliant.

    Reply
  4. Shodan says:

    "If they want it then that's enoug for us to be against it!"
     
    In that mindset you don't need alternatives. I just wish Sottish Labour and other voters would wake up to this farce.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,790 Posts, 1,222,569 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • sarah on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Rob, independence is a dead duck only if we all give up. I know it is depressing when the cause…Jul 24, 11:18
    • Stuart on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““ But perhaps most of all “the colonizer hates theory”, for theory (such as postcolonial theory) ultimately reveals the colonial…Jul 24, 11:10
    • Northcode on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““But perhaps most of all “the colonizer hates theory…” Indeed so, Alf. As is plain for all to see here…Jul 24, 11:09
    • Captain Caveman on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Constructive criticism – even if robustly or incredulously asserted – isn’t “trolling”, mate. Are you and your ilk such snowflakes…Jul 24, 10:58
    • Captain Caveman on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “‘… Sometimes the response to a particularly stupid attempt at making some useless point or other by a singularly dim-witted…Jul 24, 10:55
    • Dan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Well worth a read. https://dearscotland.substack.com/p/why-nuclear-power-in-scotland-isJul 24, 10:39
    • Alf Baird on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “As Memmi wrote, and as we can see in oor ain laund an among oor ain fowk, a “Colonized society…Jul 24, 10:24
    • Aidan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “I will give it to you Northcode, that is quite an amusing post, and a spirited defence of what you…Jul 24, 10:07
    • Rob on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “I know that I have never “attacked” Alf Baird. Like a number of folk on here I just think he…Jul 24, 10:02
    • Chas on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Why is it that the fantasists and cranks assume that any one commentating on the repetitive, self centered dross produced…Jul 24, 09:55
    • Northcode on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “A staunch unionist (colonialist?), and a proud Ingle tae boot, on here has just re-stated almost the entirety of a…Jul 24, 09:46
    • Marie on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “My thoughts exactly!!!Jul 24, 08:09
    • Callum on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “The BIG questions. Should any doctor who is incapable of determining the sex of their patients be allowed to practice…Jul 24, 07:42
    • Young Lochinvar on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Quality Doctor eh.. . Did she pass basic biology? Doctor! Doctor! Road traffic accident casualty just in and it looks…Jul 24, 06:02
    • Young Lochinvar on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Aha!! P3nisbreath McP3nisbreathface is back after an absence no doubt at Langley and.. T A..v. And upset about a Barbie…Jul 24, 05:51
    • Willie on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Reading the various comments it does seem that Alf Baird has very much become the focus of coordinated attack from…Jul 24, 05:19
    • Hatey McHateface on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““You’re all afraid and it shows” Sure. I’m forever shitting ma kegs at the idea that TH and ‘Mrs James’…Jul 24, 03:57
    • Hatey McHateface on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““There’s barely a comment posted here by a unionist (colonialist?) that is anything other than childish insult, threat, lies, diversion,…Jul 24, 03:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““What does tomorrow hold – an accusation of genocide?” Well, to be fair, the bar for that is being lowered…Jul 24, 03:26
    • Young Lochinvar on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Lorn @ 11.32 This deviant crap has been about in Europe for ages. Remember the early 90s Harry Enfield/ Paul…Jul 24, 01:25
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Ah! I didn’t know Bill Rolston had died. Tá sé anois ar shlí na fírinne, as the Irish say. Ar…Jul 24, 00:37
    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “I agree, even if I don’t agree with every word Alf says. He is a distinguished academic and researcher and…Jul 23, 23:45
    • aLurker on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “@Fearghas Thankyou for that Bill Rolston video, Indeed very interesting to hear the distilled observations from his book: “Ireland, Colonialism,…Jul 23, 23:43
    • Jay on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Rob does not think ‘gender woo woo’ was really imported therefore he/she must be able to cite at least some…Jul 23, 23:40
    • Lorn on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Mark Began: Scottish, British, European, Scandinavian, Commonwealth, American governments all culpable. Perhaps it is time that we stopped to wonder…Jul 23, 23:32
    • Jay on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “Rob does not think ‘gender woo woo’ was really imported therefore he/she must be able to cite at least some…Jul 23, 23:08
    • agent x on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: ““Mark Beggan says: Which brings us back to the Scottish government.” ——————————————– No – equality training courses started after the…Jul 23, 21:55
    • Mark Beggan on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “‘equality training courses ‘ Which brings us back to the Scottish government.Jul 23, 21:19
    • Captain Caveman on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “‘… Alf Baird puts forward a coherent and convincing argument based on sound and methodical academic research.’ He has done…Jul 23, 21:16
    • agent x on Everybody’s Normal Nowadays: “they’re organs but not as we know them Jim.Jul 23, 21:04
  • A tall tale



↑ Top