The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Dizzy heights

Posted on August 01, 2012 by

We expect next month’s Wings Over Scotland viewing figures to take a pretty big fall, as politics will still be on holiday and there won’t be any more stories about the Rangers saga to fill the gaping NewsChasm (tm) left by the summer “silly season”. So we hope you’ll allow us this toot on our stat-trumpet before the inevitable slide.

July saw yet another record-smashing month for the blog, piling almost 40,000 page views onto the previous high – a 17% increase – and boosting the number of unique visitors by an even more startling 27%, to just shy of 30,000. The running total of 986,764 pageviews since we started nine months ago means that in August we should at least be able to boast of breaking through the 1-million barrier well within our first year, which will be some small degree of consolation.

It’s traditional at this point to cough modestly and hopefully towards the “Donate” button – we’ve got just about enough cash from generous viewers now to get on with moving to a more robust server, under our “official” domain name that won’t see the blog blocked for some readers for having “game” in its address – but mostly we just wanted to say thanks once more to the people who are increasingly making Wings Over Scotland their first stop for Scottish political news with just slightly too much focus on football. We’ll try not to let you down.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mogabee

Rev  You’ve got an irreverent, analytical and humerous take on all you write that is very enjoyable and refreshing.Even as a non fooball fan I’ve read all the “rangers” stuff! Many of the comments make me laugh and keep me coming back for more.
 
 Will certainly donate.

Bill C

Thoroughly deserved, best political blog in Scotland by far.

McHaggis

a refreshing alternative to the stomach churning bile and propaganda on other established news sites such as ‘The Scotsman’…

I say ‘established’ only in the historical context. Clearly comparing their plummeting readership with blogs like your own, which are on the rise, must say something about both the future of newspapers in general and particularly those with such a vomit-inducing bias to Unionism and the Torys (blue and red Torys that is).

I stopped buying The Scotsman years ago.
I stopped contributing to their on-line ‘forum’ within the last 6 months or so
After glancing at today’s top political and other ‘news’ stories I am on the cusp of never even going back to their on-line presence.

If ever their was an example of a publication’s decline being entirely self-inflicted then surely The Scotsman is it.

Doug Daniel

For more perspective, here are the circulation figures for the daily newspapers in Scotland from November last year.
The Scottish Sun – 314,822
Daily Record – 267,075
Scottish Daily Mail – 108,047
Scottish Daily Express – 63,601
Daily Star of Scotland – 63,241
The Herald – 45,646
The Scotsman – 38,289
Daily Mirror – 22,805
Daily Telegraph – 20,416
The Times – 19,042
The Guardian – 12,936
Independent – 7,276
Financial Times – 3,461

So your unique visitors tally exceeds the circulation figures of all the non-Scottish “quality” papers, and even the Daily Mirror. Probably not too long until you surpass the Scotsman’s figures too.
 

John Lyons

I agree with Mogabee, it’s the perfect balance of ireverence and humour that has me coming back everyday, but it’s also the detailed knoweldge, particularly in issues which are deliberately obfuscated and complicated, like Rangers finances. You seem to be able to cut through the crap and get to the point.

Well done.

And keep the football in there. I think I have seen a Celtic supporters for independence page on Facebook (to go with the Labour Lib Dem and Tory ones!) Not seen a Rangers one yet, but as long as that Celtic one exists I suppose it’s relevant to talk about football on a political blog (And vice vrsa!)

cynicalHighlander

#John Lyons
link to facebook.com
2012 germination seems to be on the up, might be the rain.

annie

just want to add my “well done” i’ve been hooked for ages

Morag

To be honest, I was irritated by all the football stuff, and wished it wasn’t there.  But then RevStu pointed out the traffic it was bringing to the blog, and I capitulated entirely.  But the other upside is that I read enough of it to begin to have a glimmering of an idea what it was all about, and to understand what BBC Scotland and the Herald were on about.  I wouldn’t have read it at all if the presentation hadn’t been so amusing.
 
Roll on the new server.  I do worry a bit if our IT guys will see that “gamer” thing, and come after me.  I hope all these Twitter links don’t make it look as if I’m on Twitter – I don’t Tweet at all, I never read it and I don’t even have a Twitter account.

Seasick Dave

Well done Rev!

If you get enough in the way of donations, you may want to pay Jimbo a wee retainer.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,683 Posts, 1,207,103 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Andy Ellis on Once more around: “I don’t think there are in fact many countries which are or were in the situation Scotland finds itself. Generally…Jan 2, 20:45
    • gregor on Once more around: “Labour (2024): Keir Starmer’s time as Director of Public Prosecutions (CPS): “Keir Starmer was appointed Chief Prosecutor and head of…Jan 2, 20:19
    • Mia on Once more around: “What this means is that, in practice, Scotland does not care if that bottle of whisky is sold to England…Jan 2, 20:07
    • Mia on Once more around: ““How is the value of the money the same?” If the price Scotland sets for a particular bottle of whisky…Jan 2, 20:03
    • Dan on Once more around: “Port wise, dinnae forget the massive warmongering bastard tourism boost to Scotland’s economy of aw the weapons of mass destruction…Jan 2, 20:00
    • Iain More on Once more around: “He missed the touchline as Indy is also going to get well hoofed into touch by the Creepy Stalker Wokes…Jan 2, 19:41
    • gregor on Once more around: “Keir Starmer (2014): How can we prevent another Rotherham? “It’s not about individuals. Abuse scandals on the same scale will…Jan 2, 19:39
    • Iain More on And Then What?: “And there is the problem right there. Scots should back Indy regardless of who the fuckin English vote for. Indy…Jan 2, 19:38
    • factchecker on Once more around: “As I said in my comment above, the value of the money of every country is the exact same as…Jan 2, 19:28
    • Campbell Clansman on Once more around: “I give facts and statistics. You respond with something illiterate about the “next First Minster.” [sic] I’m pleased with the…Jan 2, 19:26
    • Mia on Once more around: ““Where exactly would you like to locate all the extra ports round our coastline?” I am not an expert, but…Jan 2, 19:17
    • factchecker on Once more around: “I agree – they should have had a vote. Re those unfortunates in engerland: I’m glad you can make yourself…Jan 2, 19:04
    • Dan on Once more around: “A new year and here we are on 2nd January 2025, which is 116,029 days since the union, and still we…Jan 2, 19:02
    • willie on Once more around: “Dear oh dear what absolute twaddle Campbell. You certainly get belters here below the line. Mumbo jumbo and numbers rumbled…Jan 2, 19:02
    • Mia on Once more around: ““If Scotland exports a higher %age of its exports to rUK than vice versa, it ‘needs’ rUK more than rUK…Jan 2, 18:58
    • factchecker on Once more around: “I agree with a lot of what you say. However, it’s equally true that many countries with all of Scotland’s…Jan 2, 18:49
    • Dan on Once more around: “I don’t live in a bubble so there’s no bubble burstage occurring, but do like to see honest discussion. So…Jan 2, 18:47
    • Alf Baird on Once more around: “The so-called Scottish ‘Government’ is a UK Government spending department whose allegiance/oath and that of its MSPs, Ministers and civil…Jan 2, 18:46
    • Campbell Clansman on Once more around: “In the Dec. 31st poll I cited, 22.9% of Labour supporters said they’d vote for Indy. Sorry to burst your…Jan 2, 18:40
    • twathater on Once more around: “Funny how FARTCHECKER has drawn out the big guns franchise fanny to explainerise how the rest of the wurld thinks…Jan 2, 18:39
    • factchecker on Once more around: ““England has never been part of the EU” That is factually incorrect. England’s territory was part of the EU until…Jan 2, 18:32
    • twathater on Once more around: “What happened to ALL those EU citizens who lived , worked and paid taxes in the uk but were then…Jan 2, 18:32
    • Dan on Once more around: “Hey CC, I see you’re still posting highly selective bollox. “The Ipsos poll shows that almost 40% of Scottish Labour’s…Jan 2, 18:31
    • gregor on Once more around: “NOTHING TO DECLARE: Louder Than Words: Savior: “We’re not the same Yet we still pretend we are Living in this…Jan 2, 18:30
    • Mia on Once more around: ““You’re assuming (without any evidence I can see) that the poll was just some online poll in The National” You…Jan 2, 18:27
    • twathater on Once more around: “All good words but when you invite the foxes into the henhouse and give them votes on the future of…Jan 2, 18:14
    • Dan on Once more around: “https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-case-of-the-missing-billions/ https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2019/08/21/the-gers-data-is-ludicrous-scotland-does-not-generate-60-of-the-uks-net-fiscal-deficit/Jan 2, 18:09
    • sarah on Once more around: “It is very interesting that Winnie Ewing talked in terms of the transfer being a breach of the Treaty of…Jan 2, 18:09
    • sarah on Once more around: “Sorry! Lloyd Quinan not Neale Hanvey. It was on a TASP that Lloyd said it.Jan 2, 17:59
    • gregor on Once more around: “Wow, 2 nasty anti-social-human fu**s are lurking in the shadows (like a glowing nuclear powered Neon Red sign – stuck…Jan 2, 17:56
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
266
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x