The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Why metagaming is the only true gaming

Posted on June 19, 2010 by

Anyone who's been reading WoS or WoSblog for any amount of time will probably already have noticed that I have very little time for videogames that want to tell stories.

There are plenty of fields of culture available already for people who want to be told stories. Books, films, comics, TV,  theatre and even music are all ideally suited to story-telling, and frequently do a brilliant job of it. You wouldn't hire a footballer to come round and do your plumbing, so why would you look to videogames for storytelling?

But anyway. I bang on about that subject at greater length here and here, so we don't need to go through it again. What I'd like to draw your attention to instead is a glorious example of the art (dang!) of a videogame being a videogame. The unwieldily-titled Pix'n Love Rush, in fact, goes beyond being a videogame – it's a metagame. That is to say, it's a videogame that's about being a videogame.

Metagaming is a sub-genre that was to all intents and purposes kicked off by the immortal Wario Ware on the GBA (though strictly speaking the first examples came many years before, with the likes of Lazy Jones on the 8-bit home computers). It's characterised by games packed with references to other games, and tends to utilise gameplay stripped of all pretence at simulating real-world activities.

Metagames don't want you to think you're driving a racing car or saving the world from armies of evil. They want you to know that you're sitting in your house (or on the bus or in the pub) with a controller in your hand playing a videogame, and they want you to not be ashamed of it.

The genre which Pix'n Love Rush boils down to its barest bones is platforming. The game consists of two modes, a five-minute Time Attack and an endless Infinite game. Both comprise a non-stop sequence of randonly-selected short platforming levels (chosen from a range of 125) where you have to collect coins, avoid minus blocks, shoot bats with your vertically-firing gun and protect (ie not shoot) angels.

Each level can be as short as six seconds or as long as about 20 seconds, and if you complete a level perfectly you get a bonus of 10,000 times your current multiplier. The multiplier (which can be 1, 2, 5 or 10) is increased by making combos, which is to say doing the Good Things (collecting coins and shooting bats) without doing any of the Bad Things (hitting a minus block, getting an angel killed, or stupidly getting shot by your own bullet – it falls back down the screen  in a slight arc if it doesn't hit anything).

Do a Bad Thing and your multiplier goes down a level – as well as costing you a pixel of energy from your "heart", depicted at top left – but you can miss as many coins or bats as you like without damaging it. It's only when you actually cause some harm that you're penalised.

And that's pretty much it for the gameplay. Run out of energy (or in the five-minute game, out of either energy or time) and it's game over. The pace is fast and relentless and the levels are incredibly varied – some are static, some scroll horizontally (both left and right), and some scroll vertically (both up and down).

Some are speed rushes across collapsing platforms, others are intricate and mazy, some are about precision and planning – the only common factor is that you'll have to be on top form to notch a perfect. (You'll need a good few perfects to beat the built-in high scores, and you don't get an online ranking unless you've done so, which is a bit mean.)

But as particularly alert viewers will noticed from the screenshots on this page, the game has a more immediately striking feature too. In keeping with the metagaming theme, Pix'n Love Rush gets bored with its graphical style as quickly as it does of each individual stage – at frequent intervals, regardless of whether you're slap-bang in the middle of a  tricky level or not, PLR simply gives itself an instant makeover.

You might suddenly find yourself playing something that looks like an old mono Gameboy game, or something in the style of The Matrix, or the glowing pixels of Arkedo's Xbox Indie games (PLR's developers Bulkypix, or possibly partner Pastagames, are connected somehow to Arkedo but it's not clear exactly how closely), or Nintendo's infamous Virtual Boy, or my personal favourite, a deteriorating TV picture with scanlines that eventually gets so out of tune it authentically pops up the "AV1" tag.

(Don't panic – the picture sorts itself out after a few seconds, and even at its worst the game remains completely playable, and that's despite having almost exactly the same poorly-laid-out controls as Qwak. They're a fair bit less troublesome here, though, because you have to use the shoot button far less often than the jump one.)

Bulkypix promise even more "skins" in future updates (I'd love to see a ZX81 style myself, along with a three-minute Time Attack option), but while they add enormously to PLR's aesthetic appeal, it's the inventive and challenging (meta)game underneath that's the star. It costs 59p, so I'm accepting no excuses whatsoever.

 

(No, not even not having an iPhone or iPod Touch. As you must be aware by now, WoS subscribers can get one of those for £6.)

0 to “Why metagaming is the only true gaming”

  1. Hypocee says:

    Wow, you are not kidding about the controls. I propose immediate funding for research to determine and screen for the chromosomal duplication that causes people to create directional controls with no dead zone.

    Reply
  2. Whereas I can't deal with Qwak on iOS, this gem's been fine. The controls are imperfect, but I've maybe had a few 'deaths' due to them, but no more. Frankly, it's an absolute steal for 59p – hugely addictive, and one of my current favourites on the platform.

    Reply
  3. Cook says:

    Is this anything like Wiz n Liz (if you haven't tried that then I think you might like it)?

    Reply
  4. MrD says:

    Wiz 'n' Liz is on the iPhone? :O

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,253,220 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “It’s not Moon cheese. That’s the kind I’ve been conditioned to believe in. I’m sure you’re right, SBS. You do…” Oct 28, 07:47
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Compared with a 6-pack, a single bottle is easier to shoplift. Not me, I hasten to add. Not now the…” Oct 28, 07:40
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “@ Aidan If the production method to make English whisky is cheaper where savings are passed on and is just…” Oct 27, 21:19
    • Southernbystander on Faces In Sand: “Plenty of cheese in England Hatey, just saying.” Oct 27, 21:01
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “100% Yes. I’m content with a just a few of can’s of lager myself 🙂” Oct 27, 20:55
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “You do make me laugh Hatey. I can still feel the tremors of you banging your desk as you read…” Oct 27, 20:53
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “I will stick my neck out and say not a single job will be affected, Scottish whisky is unassailable” Oct 27, 20:45
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “Northcode: you are going to be hugely disappointed if and when you go down that route and try to body…” Oct 27, 20:25
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “So it has to be gloves off on our part. Make the English barsturts rue the day they ever dared…” Oct 27, 20:21
    • 100%Yes on Faces In Sand: “I do love my Bailey’s 1tre at Asda £11.” Oct 27, 20:20
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “…e.g. all those ‘democratic mandates’ ignored by the colonizer.” Oct 27, 19:39
    • Bilbo on Faces In Sand: “Had to laugh at this. https://archive.is/Az6Nl English whisky GI approved with no Scotch impact assessment I say this in light…” Oct 27, 18:29
    • Oneliner on Faces In Sand: “Members of he Nazi hierarchy were not offered financial inducement for their signed approval. Members of the Scottish nobility of…” Oct 27, 17:42
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: “International law concerning territorial alienation suggests there is no democracy for people in an annexed country.” Oct 27, 16:09
    • Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 27 October, 2026 at 1:48 pm It could be that I’ve been fraudulently enjoying mental feebleness benefits…” Oct 27, 15:49
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “The Scottish independence movement has never operated at constitutional altitude because it focused on history, identity and party politics instead…” Oct 27, 14:41
    • Aidan on Faces In Sand: “I’m not sure there’s necessarily right in the context of Scotland Northcode – you are right that there is significant…” Oct 27, 14:13
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Sorry to hear that, MH. It could be that I’ve been fraudulently enjoying mental feebleness benefits that should have gone…” Oct 27, 13:48
    • Minceheid on Faces In Sand: “Hatey McHateface says: 25 October, 2026 at 6:23 pm Mental impairment is a badge of honour these days. It brings…” Oct 27, 13:15
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Some good ideas there, Northy, but the idea that the SNP wouldn’t fight like rats in a sack to be…” Oct 27, 13:12
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Wheesht, Alf! We dinna want tae tip aff the EU aboot hoo muckle they can rinse us fer when we…” Oct 27, 12:59
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “What Independence Actually Means(my compressed version) Independence is a modern constitutional process, not a feeling or a grievance. 1. Mandate…” Oct 27, 12:14
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “The big problem from an “Indy Scot” perspective is the total dearth of political talent from its Political Class (of…” Oct 27, 11:29
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “Who Negotiates on Scotland’s Behalf After a Mandate? Once Scotland votes for independence, the negotiating team is not automatically the…” Oct 27, 10:51
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: ““The ‘money’ aspect is huge” Deid richt tae, Scots plundered £150 billion+ a year an mair by a bankrupt England,…” Oct 27, 10:35
    • 100%Yes on Faces In Sand: “Why would I join? When Alex Neil said his strategy is to get support for Independence to a constant 60%…” Oct 27, 10:07
    • Chas on Faces In Sand: “An accurate summation Northcode. The ancient history guff is for numpties. The MAJORITY of Scots have to want Independence following…” Oct 27, 10:01
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “No Scottish organisation has ever articulated the real, modern, internationally-rounded process that would govern independence negotiations. Not the Scottish Government,…” Oct 27, 09:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Good point, Xaracen. I guess the surrender signed by Germany in 1945 was voided by the allies coercion bringing them…” Oct 27, 08:24
    • William Smith on Faces In Sand: “The Irish weren’t immune to a bit if colonisation either – take Scotland, for example – the place is even…” Oct 27, 07:45
  • A tall tale



↑ Top