The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Some sort of charity

Posted on September 27, 2012 by

Scottish Labour mouthpiece the Daily Record is currently running a long series of horror stories about Atos “Healthcare” and their appalling persecution of the sick and disabled. We heartily and sincerely commend the Record for doing so, even if it usually fails to note that Atos were unleashed on the poor and vulnerable by a Labour government, and occasionally just outright lies about it.

You might expect, then, that the valid concerns of the Record and its readers would be earnestly reflected by the nation’s Labour MSPs when the Scottish Parliament debated the issue of Atos’ conduct of Work Capability Assessments yesterday.

You’d be wrong, of course.

The SNP desks in the chamber were fairly well populated for a member’s-business session, with MSPs attending in double figures and numerous speakers.

Over on the Tory/Lib Dem benches, Conservative MSP Alex Johnstone was perhaps understandably alone, with nobody else from the Scottish branches of the UK’s ruling parties wishing to be associated with defending the indefensible.

And for Labour? One.

We don’t just mean Jackie Baillie was the only Labour MSP to speak in the debate. Although not present at the beginning, she was the only one who bothered to show up at all, and she stood surrounded by empty seats as her party colleagues instead ran around defending Johann Lamont’s plans to subject Scotland’s poor and disabled and elderly to means-testing in order to keep receiving personal care and prescriptions.

We were about to be shocked and disgusted, until we remembered the words of Scottish Labour MP Tom Harris a little under a year ago, as approvingly quoted by the Telegraph’s arch-Tory columnist Alan Cochrane:

“We weren’t set up as some sort of charity to help the poorest in society – the long-term unemployed, the benefit dependent, the drug addicted, the homeless.”

We’re feeling a little bit sick ourselves now, readers, but please don’t tell anyone about it. Because we don’t want Atos “Healthcare” coming after us next.

20 to “Some sort of charity”

  1. Wullie B says:

    goews to show , the SNP and pro independence parties are the only ones to care aboput the Disabled in Scotland ,more now than never do we need independence

    Reply
  2. Holebender says:

    Gobsmacked! (You’d think I’d have learned by now, but Labour’s callous disregard of their core electorate continues to amaze me.)

    Reply
  3. panda paws says:

    Of course Labour were running about trying to defuse the Lamont bomb. It’s really really important to ensure a No vote in the referendum and to ensure the C listers keep their places at the Holyhood trough. After all, if it’s Yes, then some of the “A” listers might not get parachuted into rUK seats and be forced into Holyhood and were would that leave the C listers.
    Anyone would think Labour was set up for the working classes and the defenceless and to help those who need help. Oh right.
     
     

    Reply
  4. Vermin.

    Reply
  5. Erchie says:

    Elsewhere yesterday, Westminster Labour are promising a review on the WCA. We’ll see.
     
    Though Labour’s attitude to date has been a wonderful comparison to make on the benefits of deciding these things for ourselves

    Reply
  6. Macart says:

    There are not enough sweary words in the dictionary to describe Labour leadership’s actions of the past few days.

    They soooooo deserve what comes next at the ballot. 

    Reply
  7. Really I have no words to describe how I feel about Lamont and her cronies.I only am certain of this without independence all that was fought for by previous generations will be lost.
     

    Reply
  8. EdinScot says:

    Be aa breath of fresh air come independence to concentrate on tackling the many ills that  afflict our society instead of wasting all our energies on the laughingly called Labour party.  When you have the tory loving hootsman singing a so called Labour leaders praises, the writing is well and truly on the wall.  I hope its a quick 2 years til we vote YES.

    Reply
  9. Macart says:

    Its maybe worth noting they chose this particular week and the absence of the FM to drop these bombshells. Maybe they thought Nicola would be easier to handle at FMQs.

    Some hope. 😉 

    Reply
  10. MajorBloodnok says:

    Nicola is FM material, that’s for sure.

    Reply
  11. JBS says:

    Dear Undecided Voter –
     
    Vote Yes in 2014 to protect Scotland from the ravages of the neoliberal consensus.

    Reply
  12. Davy says:

    I would like to say nothing labour does surprises me anymore, but after tuesday’s speech, I can’t.

    I also watched FM’s question time today and watched Nicola skin the arse off both Lamont and Davidson with the greatest of ease, though I would have like to have seen the camera’s pointing at the labour seats when Ruth Davidson thanked labour for their support for their policys, (resulting in fast toilet break). We have a worthy Deputy Leader for Scotland.  

    Reply
  13. Arbroath 1320 says:

    Nice to see the Tories, of either colour, were in FULL support of the Health debate.
    Boy I bet their supporters were WELL impressed with their attendance…..NOT!
     
    If we DON’T have a YES win in 20124 then, in my view, we could be looking at this happening a few years later.
    I know I DON’T want this!
     
    link to bbc.co.uk

    link to guardian.co.uk

    Reply
  14. Macart says:

    @MajorBloodnock

    I get the feeling it won’t be that far in the future either. 

    Reply
  15. Cuphook says:

    I’m sure that many of the sick and disabled are capable of some sort of work if supported properly. Many of them would probably appreciate the opportunity to participate more fully in society. But this is not the way to go about it.  

    I’ve a friend who has excellent IT skills and is logical, intelligent and imaginative – for six months of the year. The other six – not so much (I actually did lol there). I always find it a shame that no one has found a way to use his talents when he is capable. He’d like to work and have colleagues and office parties with kissing in the copy room.  

    No doubt ATOS will find him fit for work and he will then be presented with ludicrous opportunities.          

    Reply
  16. james morton says:

    @cuphook what kind of work could they do? The real issue is not what work it prevents them from doing, thats usually self evident. It’s finding that *opportunity” werr their disability would not be an issue. But it doesn’t begin and end there. There is the how he gets to work…is transport a problem, will access be a problem. Is the actual workspace safe for this person. Adequate facilities present on site? Will the employer even want to hire said disabled person – bearing insurance costs and liabilities. Are they able to do a full day or half a day, can they be left on their own or will they need assistance or a minder to keep an eye on them.
    The problem is that ATOS doesn’t support disabled people into work – it simply kicks them off the support system and throws them into the unknown. They don’t give a shit at this point. If its your friend they will find him capable and when he fails to find employment and reapplies for assistance, ATOS get to do it to him again – kaching! – another cash bonus for them.
    I am relativley lucky – I have crohns disease which is in remission so I can work. But when it was doing its absolute worst to end me, I was effectively unemployable for about a year. I am employed by the government and so had generous sick leave, without which i would have found myself out of work while still desperately ill. I count my lucky stars that I fell ill when I did. When the tories were not in government, and New labour were not the vile sh*ts that that they are today.
    If you can genuinely help a disabled person into some sort of work – thats fine and dandy but you have to be honest and compassionate enough to accept that perhaps, you simply can’t help this person. What you don’t do is harass them, hound them, attack them in the press, and generally behave like a vile tory shit towards them.
    If ATOS had appeared when the tories took over, I would not have been surprised, but it was labour who enabled these nasty vile ratfucks to prey upon the most vulnerable in our society. The tories must have been sick from laughing at the opportunity this contract gave them to do what they do best…be complete and utter bastards

    Reply
  17. Appleby says:

    It’s got to the point where part of me feels that if Scotland and the Scottish people aren’t sensible enough to vote YES on 2014 that they frankly deserve the likely dystopian nightmare that will follow from it. It’s just a shame that me and mine will also be dragged into that nightmare, so I can’t simply give into fate or despair. The effort’s still on to avoid that possibility!

    Reply
  18. Holebender says:

    If Scotland’s voters vote NO in 2014 they deserve everything that’s coming to them, and I won’t be sticking around to witness it. I’ll find a proper independent democracy to live in.

    Reply
  19. Erchie says:

    Cuphook

    I believe you have said similar things before and been corrected

    The current system takes someone who is weak from Chemo to combat their cancer, tells them they are fit to work and tells them if they do not work shelf stacking for a rich company in exchange for that benefit they will lose it,

    Unlike earlier schemes there is no help towards transport costs or a top up to the benefit.

    It is not a mere matter of presentation, about a fair system unfairly vilified, it really is a fucking horror with the “Health Professionals”, e.g. a physio nurse, being pressured to find folk fit to work who should be inpatients at hospitals

    Reply
  20. Appleby says:

    Atos and its kind represent the kind of world we used to look down upon in the world or back on in dark histories from sadder times. I’ve yet to meet anyone who things these things are good, so how have they been getting away with pushing it all so far?

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,984 Posts, 1,252,127 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Tried to depose German Geordie and replace him with the rightful heir to the throne. There, fixed that for ye.…” Oct 3, 00:02
    • willie on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Great support for this absolutely essential court action. It is an outrage that £700k can be solicited to be ring…” Oct 2, 22:58
    • daibloandco on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Donated and keep ’em worried!” Oct 2, 21:43
    • Frank Gillougley on In The Eyes Of The Law: “50 in with pleasure and appreciation.” Oct 2, 21:11
    • Alf Baird on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Yes Hatey, dealing effectively with the colonial ‘condition’ requires difficult treatment; liberation is the only remedy and takes effect through…” Oct 2, 20:38
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Sell some of your tea towels and you could donate more.” Oct 2, 20:07
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: “How come you’re immune to the pathology then, Alf? The vaccinations aren’t available on the SNHS. Did you pay to…” Oct 2, 19:50
    • Alf Baird on In The Eyes Of The Law: ““Those of us with an open, questioning and independent mind” That’s perhaps a rather theoretical assumption, Spartan, especially for a…” Oct 2, 18:50
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: “BS, sam. 1715 and 1745 were dynastic and sectarian uprisings. Attempts to depose the Protestant Hanoverian royal line and replace…” Oct 2, 18:50
    • sam on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Not so sure about this claim, Alf. There were many armed uprisings in colonial Ireland against English rule. The 1715…” Oct 2, 17:21
    • Dave on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Wow, the fund is filling up fast, excellent news! I, for one, cannot wait to see the miscreants sweating on…” Oct 2, 17:18
    • agentx on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Why it is considered secure • Direct Lawyer Payouts: Funds do not go to the individual starting the page. Money…” Oct 2, 17:16
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “@Alf – No, those of us who learn read the theory then use it to put it into practice and…” Oct 2, 16:54
    • James on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Keep ’em coming, ‘Confused’. Larry, curly and Moe bite every time. Speaking of stooges I wonder when the fragrant ‘Adrian’…” Oct 2, 16:53
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Who had Freire on their Bingo card?” Oct 2, 16:39
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I’m assuming “sparky” refers to “Spartan”, if I can read correctly through your blurry alcohol-fuelled stupor, 8 Ace. “tell (sic…” Oct 2, 16:30
    • Alf Baird on In The Eyes Of The Law: ““uses the quotes of others” This is nothing new for academics who logically base their research first on the available…” Oct 2, 16:17
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “You are right Confused! Your unhinged idiocy is truly legendary., even here. Very conversation-worthy, personally I find it incredible. Always…” Oct 2, 16:04
    • sarah on In The Eyes Of The Law: “@ douglas – you can reduce the tip, even to zero.” Oct 2, 16:01
    • douglas on In The Eyes Of The Law: “happy to contribute, not happy with crowdjustice. Imposing an extra 20% and calling it a tip is taking the p.…” Oct 2, 15:44
    • lothianlad on The Turning Point: “The SNP leadership have actively working FOR the british state. Sturgeon is the greatest traitor to Scotland in the modern…” Oct 2, 15:22
    • lothianlad on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Well done Stu! They are rattled! Only those with integrity should be allowed power.” Oct 2, 15:20
    • Confused on In The Eyes Of The Law: “The only thing worse than being talked about, is NOT being talked about … I seem to have the WORST…” Oct 2, 15:13
    • Spartan 117 on In The Eyes Of The Law: “James likes to label anyone he disagrees with as “Unionist” or “Yoon”. A bit like Confused’s rantings when its necked…” Oct 2, 14:44
    • Hatey McHateface on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Cesaire wrote about “goitrous academics”. I don’t think he was being complimentary, although I do recommend that anybody interested should…” Oct 2, 13:57
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I’m not going anywhere, Fatty. Enjoy.” Oct 2, 13:34
    • James on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Unionist shill; **** off. There’s a good chap.” Oct 2, 13:03
    • Knuckle_Heid on In The Eyes Of The Law: “£100 donated – go get ’em Rev!” Oct 2, 12:13
    • Connor on In The Eyes Of The Law: “Why no paypal option ? Sorry I do not feel safe having to give my card details to all, paypal…” Oct 2, 11:39
    • Captain Caveman on In The Eyes Of The Law: “I respect anyone who gets up for work every morning, goes to work, pays their own way, pays their taxes…” Oct 2, 11:28
  • A tall tale



↑ Top