The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Were we watching the same game?

Posted on July 26, 2012 by

The headline above (and slight variants thereof) is a time-honoured response to reports of any event at which the reader’s interpretation of proceedings might differ significantly to that of the writer. Today’s press provides a striking example of the phenomenon.

While the 2012 London Olympics don’t “officially” start until tomorrow, they in fact got underway yesterday with a number of matches in the women’s football competition. Some of them took place at Hampden Park in Glasgow, where ticket sales had been extremely disappointing, in common with the other football venues but in striking contrast to the rest of the Games.

The Scotsman’s take on the opening day was unremittingly positive. Under the headline “A damp squib? Nae chance as Games belong to sunny Glasgow”, it reported a glowing reception in Scotland’s biggest city.

“After all the doubts and fears expressed over the past seven years that the Games would do little for those swathes of Britain north of Watford, the carnival atmosphere in the streets of Glasgow’s southside yesterday was a fitting riposte.

Following several days of unrelenting rain, the sun made a welcome and overdue appearance to greet thousands of visitors pouring in to watch USA play France, followed by Colombia versus DPR Korea, in the women’s football event.”

Sounds like a grand old party down Mount Florida way, doesn’t it?

“In the lead-up, there were fears that Hampden’s seats would be emptier than during the dark days of Berti Vogts’ reign over Scotland’s national side. Organisers reportedly gave away as many as 34,000 tickets for the opening tie in a stadium boasting a capacity of 52,000.

In the event, there were plenty of empty seats. But the 6,000 or so who bought tickets were jubilant to be in Glasgow, many having travelled far.”

It’d be hard to think of how anyone could put a more positive spin on the fact that barely 10% of the available tickets for the event had been sold. But still, with 6,000 tickets bought and 34,000 given away for free in a stadium holding 52,000, and glorious sunshine bathing all of Scotland for the first time in weeks, at least we’d be assured of an impressive 40,000 crowd for the great spectacle, right?

No official attendance figures were released, but we’re going to go ahead and confidently assert that the picture above indicates Hampden operating at rather less than 80% of capacity. The Scotsman’s description of “plenty of empty seats” is technically accurate, but something of an understatement. The Herald carried more details of the crowd figures in a piece by Robbie Dinwoodie that seems to have vanished from the face of the Earth since we read it early this morning, but another report in the same paper suggested that:

 “An estimated 12,000 spectators, many of whom had been given free tickets at the last minute, arrived at Hampden for the kick-off of the game between the women from the USA and France at 5pm.”

That seems a fair guess to us, based on the TV pictures, but filling even 20% of the ground was something of a peak. Later in the evening when Colombia played North Korea (in a game whose kickoff was admittedly delayed by an hour due to an embarrassing cock-up over flags), the vast bulk of those spectators had drifted away, despite the pleasant evening conditions. The Daily Record put the number remaining at just 1,000 and this image taken at half-time seems to back that assessment up:

(The BBC commentator described the attendance as “a reasonable crowd”. If you don’t believe us, or doubt that that’s really a half-time shot, you can check for yourself.)

All we’re saying is, when in future you read The Scotsman reporting on the mood and/or popularity of an event, whether it be an independence rally or a Scottish Labour conference, keep this sort of thing in mind.

11 to “Were we watching the same game?”

  1. pa_broon says:

    Thank god for school kids, I got the distinct impression they were also pedalled out for the olympic flame carry on too. What self-respecting child would to turn down a free half day away from school?

    That last picture looks  as if there are more players and officials than spectators.

    I would also say; ‘…jubilant to be in Glasgow…’ If you say so. And I rather suspect those who ‘travelled far’ were the players.

    😉

    Reply
  2. TheeForsakenOne says:

    Since the torch was running past my place of work I was able to see it without having to leave the office. I was quite surprised at the size of the crowd… until I walked by the local bus station at lunchtime just after it and saw six or eight coaches parked there. It seems Locog were unsurprisingly not against bussing in the crowds.

    On topic, I’m surprised the Scotsman of all people is pursuing that line. I expect that sort of patter from the BBC.

    Reply
  3. Tris says:

    It reminds me of the day that the torch went to Edinburgh, and a BBC woman standing in front of 3/4 empty stands on the castle esplanade declaring that Edinburgh had turned out in force to see the torch. I expect she must have believed that the population of Edinburgh was around 250.

    The venues in London of course will be far busier, as they will be putting on stuff that someone might reasonably want to see, and then filling the venues with free tickets for the sponsors.

    Unfortunately in the aqua stadium 2400 seats have no view of the diving boards and a further 600 have only partial view (despite them having been sold at between 30 and 50 pounds a piece!)

    Scot Goes Pop has photographs of the stadium, which James took himself, showing how empty the place was..
     

    Reply
  4. Doug Daniel says:

    If it was any other type of event, they’d have moved it to somewhere with a more suitable capacity. The Toryglen Regional Football Centre next door, for instance?

    Using a 52,000 seater stadium for a football match with just 1,000 spectators seems like an awful waste, and I suspect it’s not Coca Cola and McDonalds who are paying the stadium costs. 

    Reply
  5. Arbroath 1320 says:

    Oops! 😀
     
    Oh dear, they seem to have had fewer spectators than at a Gretna 2008 game 😆 (I’m not having a go at Gretna you understand)
     
    Mind you I don’t think it helps them very much when the organising committee (LOCOG) can’t even get the correct flag put up on the video they sent up to Hampden! JEEZ! Who are this bunch of no hopers?

    I do love a good comedy routine but this one is just plain ridiculous. 😆

    Reply
  6. Holebender says:

    pa_broon, aren’t the schools on holiday where you are? Or in Glasgow?
     
    I know they’re on their Summer holidays in Aberdeenshire and I’m pretty sure it’s the same throughout Scotland.

    Reply
  7. Juteman says:

    I’m surprised the BBC haven’t blamed Cybernat hackers for the flag cock-up.

    Reply
  8. pa_broon says:

    They are just now but weren’t for the flame when it was bestowing its hallowed glow on our benighted country.

    My point was, they bussed in school kids for the torch thing then gave away free tickets to school kids for the football, hence, thank god (if you believe in that sort of thing) for a steady supply of warm bodies to fluff the numbers up a bit.

    (As an after thought, one wonders if the schools hadn’t been on holiday, would special dispensation be given to attend the football games?)

    Reply
  9. Holebender says:

    Ahhh… OK then. I misunderstood you the first time round. Mea culpa.
     
    To answer your afterthought, probably. I’m sure the Lord Coe Almighty himself would have issued the orders!

    Reply
  10. Juteman says:

    Jim Murphy blames Scotland for the flag fiasco. My earlier post was almost correct.

    link to snp.org

    Reply
  11. shosn says:

    link to dailymail.co.uk
     
    link to thesun.co.uk

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,989 Posts, 1,252,662 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Willie on The fight about to come: “Small diversion on a Saturday evening. Now we know budgets are tight and we know that transport for some children…” Oct 16, 22:44
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “« The Nazis were only too anxious to secure the lustre of Thomas Mann’s presence and the prestige that mere…” Oct 16, 21:00
    • sam on The fight about to come: “I should have added that GERS is produced independently of Scottish ministers.” Oct 16, 19:37
    • sam on The fight about to come: “Who knows Mr Swinney’s feelings? Margaret Cuthbert was on the panel responding to that Committee inquiry into GERS. Here is…” Oct 16, 19:33
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “What glass house pray am i supposed to inhabit? A purely rhetorical matter forsooth. & All depends on the provenance…” Oct 16, 19:00
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “Indeed you are quite confused, confused. Jesus was a Jew, orthodox by today’s standards. Perhaps you are a Marcionist and…” Oct 16, 18:49
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Wasn’t he that bloke who was considerably to the left of Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell?” Oct 16, 18:38
    • factchecker on The fight about to come: “A good question, Sarah. Possibly one factor is because John Swinney remembers this Holyrood committee meeting where he was sitting…” Oct 16, 18:06
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Ah! But of course, wilfully blind, crass hypocrisy comes as standard with these permanently affronted “types”. Expecting moral consistency is…” Oct 16, 17:56
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “I bet you’ve suspected for years that yer Dad’s nae yer real Dad. False flags, eh?” Oct 16, 17:44
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““you do seem a cohort of embittered personages eyes reddened by a surfeit of prejudice” Seriously? Yet you have nothing…” Oct 16, 17:41
    • Lorncal on The fight about to come: “Indeed, Northcode, I agree with you on your use of anomaly as it applied to Mr Salmond, the person, not…” Oct 16, 17:22
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “Happily the SSRG Conference is on youtube so we can listen to some very sensible, intelligent, informed people speaking. The…” Oct 16, 17:18
    • J Robertson on The fight about to come: “Really ? what could possibly go wrong ?” Oct 16, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Meh. Well, your garden’s looking a tad shite from where I’m standing TURABDIN. Glass houses and all that. 😀” Oct 16, 16:25
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “@Capt Caveman, Hatey, Northcode, On the basis of observation you do seem a cohort of embittered personages eyes reddened by…” Oct 16, 14:43
    • Confused on The fight about to come: “describing zionism as “racism” is pretty mild – I mean if you “really want to go there” tribalists, being tribal,…” Oct 16, 13:14
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “An interesting article about the crisis tearing the English Greens apart: https://unherd.com/newsroom/greens-zionism-row-could-tear-the-party-in-two/ The author essentially claims that it’s the Corbynist…” Oct 16, 12:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Easy for you to say, SBS, but then you’re forgetting just how much grift and lucre there is to be…” Oct 16, 12:24
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the map of this island looks rather different come 2100” There’s defo gonna…” Oct 16, 12:10
    • Minceheid on The fight about to come: “Hatey McHateface says: 15 October, 2026 at 6:47 pm Dinna fash, MH, I’m in no position to draw my lines…” Oct 16, 11:42
    • Dick Wall on The fight about to come: “A stopped clock is right twice a day. The continued shambles that is the UK today could build support for…” Oct 16, 11:32
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “Everything from the past effects the present but people pick and choose what matters. How many on here would agree…” Oct 16, 11:22
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Aww, “Hatey’s Middle East friends”. I wonder who they might be. Surely not the people who have done more for…” Oct 16, 08:27
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““protofascist” I believe that to be a new word on Wings BTL. I’m certain it’s just another of those words…” Oct 16, 08:11
    • Luigi on The fight about to come: “Sigh. Do these so-called independence “leaders” not realise that their promises, their BS, their lack of action, lack of ambition,…” Oct 16, 08:03
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““Allowing rUK a reasonable time to relocate them might bring some rent to offset debt” Of course it will, sam.…” Oct 16, 08:00
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “SALVO digital newsletter: ‘Territorial Alienation’ https://indd.adobe.com/view/713e7419-f745-461a-b79e-a061397e7638” Oct 15, 23:31
    • Northcode on The fight about to come: “I’m with the Captain on this one – Turabdin’s (I don’t do all-caps words or names unless I’m shouting at…” Oct 15, 23:07
    • Northcode on The fight about to come: “anomaly (noun) something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected. I’d say the intelligent, well-read, erudite, honest and…” Oct 15, 22:50
  • A tall tale



↑ Top