I keep on thinking of the myth of Babel and the sheer voluminous cacophony all this kerfuffle generated, the wholly fallacious reasoning of confirmation bias, the mass scamming and consequent mutilations and the endless queue of institutions and dullard politicians all signing up for this nonsense that said THEY were God!
That is some mess that is all going to have to be cleaned up. Psychotherapists will be engaged for aeons to come. Ker-ching. How sad. How sad it truly is for all concerned.
“Psychotherapists will be engaged for aeons to come”
You are not wrong Frank, for there is always a pathology associated with colonialism (Cesaire) which evidently has a significant impact on the colonized group psyche, as well as on the colonizer (Memmi; Fanon); indeed, colonialism ‘is based on psychology’.
Well, as everyone who follows hand-egg (which America insists on calling football) knows the Bears come from Chicago, which has a pretty big Roman Catholic population. So the answer to your question is “Yes.”
Cracking cartoon today. I only woke up ten minutes ago so it took me a few seconds. Then the house shook as I laughed.
As you imply, Scot, an imperial supreme court is seldom an appropriate place to consider opinion on self-determination of subordinated peoples and colonial territories. But then, the SNP elite appears ignorant of that fact as they have ‘never undertaken a reasoned study of colonial society’ (Fanon).
On the matter of a colonized people assuming another national identity as a key aim in the colonial hoax; yes, Indians, Kenyan’s, Irish, Scots and many other ‘peoples’ were made to think of themselves as British, and some still do. But as the author of ‘Culture & Imperialism’ Professor Edward Said explained, this is a ‘cultural illusion’, and for Scots a ‘false persona’ (Purves).
Here we return to the realisation that colonialism ‘is based on psychology’ and that among every colonized people there are those who “suffer from a dependency complex, who are psychologically made for dependence, who need dependence, they crave it, demand it” (Cesaire). There is no shortage of such people in Scotland, as in any colony, and who oppose thay’re ain leeberty an haud doun thay’re ain fowk.
And there was me thinking it was based on nasty people with more or better weapons invading, destroying, slaying, imprisoning and evicting the rightful occupants.
Truly every day a school day on Wings BTL!
But let’s get the message out to the rightful occupants of that Eastern European country, currently in its fourth year of being colonised.
Tell them it’s all psychological messing in their heids!
The conflict you refer to occurred because, among other reasons, U imposed the U language on the R speaking community mainly in the east of the country and banned teaching R language and imposed restricted public usage of the R language in U.
Such linguistic imperialism is about imposing oppressive cultural change which in turn impacts the psyche of the oppressed group and in time alters their national identity.
Scots (and other colonized peoples) believing they are British/English is a case in point, and likewise arguably a consequence of cultural and linguistic imperialism. Hence as you say, “psychological messing in their heids”, and the condition known as ‘colonial mindset’.
Aye, Alf, “they had it coming” continues to be a staple of a certain cadre of the Indy supporters.
The central belt of Scotland is hoaching with English speakers. Many of them of recent English descent. Yet you frequently post on here that we in an independent Scotland must all read, write and speak Scots.
To be consistent then, you’ll have to support England when she invades, wrecks a quarter of the country, kills a few hundred thousand of us and kidnaps our kids to take them south of the border, so they can be taught their native country is an artificial construct with no right to exist.
I’ll be charitable and say you really haven’t thought this through. But only because it’s you.
The evisceration of the deluded, wonderfully demonstrated, without any words required.
Robert Burns wrote that “Facts are chiels that winna ding”,
and three facts are
The Pope is a Catholic
Bears shit in the woods
A woman is an adult human female.
It says that something is amiss in our collective consciousness, when it was necessary to petition the highest court in the land in order to affirm the last of those three facts.
Brilliant
Some paid a high price in this insanity. Real bravery is standing up to the cult. Precious few so called representatives of the people showed that courage.
I wonder where all the righteous indignation from the straight, middle class Trans allies are when the outcome of this ruling is that the small number of Trans people have to use unisex toilets in the workplace (which most likely considering the small number of them, they and their team will be moved to the same floor which has them) and the hospitality industry offers something similar?
Question:
If Trannies are to be afforded the expensive luxury of their own toilets, then what ISO Standards approved pictograms will the door sign have? A teapot??
Why? It’s only very recently that most people have come to realise that gender identity theory is based on what gender you FEEL you are on any given day, hour, week, month. That’s why the ideology destroys the entire concept of safeguarding of women and girls. No surgical operation is required.
Brilliant depiction of the imbecility of the politicians that this needed to be shown to them, well done Chris
As a SOVEREIGN Scot I demand that EVERY POLITICIAN who voted for this abhorrent despicable GRA in HR RESIGN IMMEDIATELY for their REFUSAL to accept their abject stupidity and for the gross financial and socialogical impact this lunacy has wrought on Scottish society , are you listening Alex Cole scuttle “I DID IT FOR BETH” you moronic piece of shit
Female Toilets. The Tranny’s favourite place until Wednesday. Have no fear Man in Skirt Swinney The Ass licker is crawling about the excrement as we speak.
A former civil servant who played a key role in drafting the Equality Act has said the supreme court’s ruling about the legal definition of a woman contradicted the act’s original intentions.
Melanie Field, who oversaw its drafting and passage through Westminster in 2010, said the legislation was meant to give transgender people with gender recognition certificates (GRCs) the same legal status as biological men or women.
She said that treating trans women with GRCs as women in relation to sex discrimination protections was “the clear premise” of the policy and legal instructions to the officials who drafted the bill.
The supreme court’s ruling on Wednesday that the legal definition of “woman” referred only to biological women was “a very significant” reinterpretation of parliament’s intentions when it passed the Equality Act 2010 and the Gender Recognition Act 2004, she said.
Straight from the horses mouth.
While this ruling was caused by a policy of the Scottish government, it was actually caused by Westminster by allowing woman’s safe space to be accessed by Transwomen.
But the Scottish government love the GRA 2004 so much that they would reduce the age to 16 and remove the obligation to have medical input!
That’s what an Independent SNP Government would have been able to do without challenge.
Let’s imagine two scenario’s.
One with the what happened with the GRA level in place at Westminster level and one where the GRA legislation wasn’t introduced.
Which of these scenario’s do you think would make it easier and less political damaging for the SNP to introduce their legislation at Holyrood?
Lets imagine another scenario, the one you described under an independent Scotland. How much easier and less political damaging would it be for any political party to introduce the legislation without having the crutch of using another legislative bodies framework?
“While this ruling was caused by a policy of the Scottish government, it was actually caused by Westminster by allowing woman’s safe space to be accessed by Transwomen.”
—————————————————
The Supreme Court Judgment specifically states that the relevant Acts did NOT allow trans to access single sex places.
The horses mouth in this case did not understand the law that she drafted.
“(23) Invalidity of the Scottish Government’s Guidance
266. For all these reasons, we conclude that the Guidance issued by the Scottish
Government is incorrect. A person with a GRC in the female gender does not come within
the definition of “woman” for the purposes of sex discrimination in section 11 of the EA
2010. That in turn means that the definition of “woman” in section 2 of the 2018 Act,
which Scottish Ministers accept must bear the same meaning as the term “woman” in
section 11 and section 212 of the EA 2010, is limited to biological women and does not
include trans women with a GRC. Because it is so limited, the 2018 Act does not stray
beyond the exception permitted in section L2 of Schedule 5 to the Scotland Act into
reserved matters. Therefore, construed in the way that we have held it is to be construed,
the 2018 Act is within the competence of the Scottish Parliament and can operate to
encourage the participation of women in senior positions in public life.”
————————————–
The Scottish Government interpreted the Equality Acts WRONG.
How much, in the round, has been spent on this crap in the“UK” ?
As a whole?
How many public funded posts, so called “charities”, quangos, NHS funded operations cost and the list goes on and on.
Then how much have “UK” wide political parties benefitted from funding from lobbying organisations promoting this guff?
I’ll bet the latter is less than the former but wouldn’t it just be good to know how many “greenbacks” have changed hands over the course of this bourach and who the financial beneficiaries have been..
Politicians all claim they are transparent, so come on, and put away the redacting hidey-hole black pens eh?!
We’re waiting; elections coming up (here at least) an’ that..
Personally I applaud the WFS doing a Samson act and pulling their rotten temple down around their ears!
I see the First Cuck has convened a conference to highlight the threat of the ‘far right’. That’s something else I will file under ‘imaginary threats and distractions’.’ Perfectly in keeping with authoritarian regimes to manufacture fictitious enemies to distract from their own failings mind you.
If we are going to have special toilet facilities for biological men who believe they are women, what about other people who believe they are something they are not?
If I believe I’m actually Louis XIV of France will there be a golden chamberpot provided with a servant to wipe my reeking fundament?
What about other people who have delusions? Will they get special facilities too?
Historically we did have special facilities, they called them asylums.
Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The majority of Scots cared about their religion back then, Mark. Only a declining minority care today. Within the burgeoning…” Sep 21, 08:46
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “It’s a simple fact, discoverable by thought alone, that no revolution can ever be finished. It’s at the moment that…” Sep 21, 08:29
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “FFS, don’t encourage him, 100%Yes. “Perhaps the main difficulty with the dominant national party leadership” is that they’re collectively thick,…” Sep 21, 08:11
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““Those serious about independence desire only peace” Aye, right, Alf. Never an asthmatic peep out of you when those regulars…” Sep 21, 07:55
Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “BILL ROLSTON: IRELAND, COLONIALISM AND THE UNFINISHED REVOLUTION Bill Rolston on his new book, co-authored with Dr Robbie McVeigh ‘Anois…” Sep 20, 23:31
Xaracen on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Hi, James; The date you cite for the dissolution of the Scottish parliament has the wrong year. From 1600 Scotland’s…” Sep 20, 22:26
Northcode on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “@Sam – 19 September, 2026 at 1:48 pm I’ve only just noticed your comment, Sam. And you pose a couple…” Sep 20, 22:26
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““he was the best we had” Indeed so. Perhaps the main difficulty with the dominant national party leadership, according to…” Sep 20, 19:23
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The UN stuff is a changing cymbal, an empty vessel making a lot of noise yet achieving and signifying nothing.…” Sep 20, 19:19
Spartan 117 on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “As usual, Alf deliberately avoids answering the point, instead dressing up his “reply” in a load of psuedoacademic wibble full…” Sep 20, 19:09
Alf Baird on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: ““hypocrisy is indeed off the scale” Hatey, as regular cheerleader here for England-as-UK supporting the Pales**ne bombing and gen*cide, as…” Sep 20, 19:08
Mark Beggan on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Remember what happened to the last Charles when he tried to impose the Jiggery Popery on the Scots. It ended…” Sep 20, 19:01
Aidan on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “So TH LOVES benefits but HATES business. Is that because a private employer is likely to frown on drunken ranting…” Sep 20, 18:54
Southernbystander on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Yes, the island group was ‘colonised’ but in the basic sense of the word in simply colonising an uninhabited place,…” Sep 20, 18:32
twathater on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “So in FACT you are NOT a factchecker YOU are just another LIAR posting LIES in the manner of the…” Sep 20, 18:22
twathater on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “And let us NOT forget Dan the amount of “IN WORK BENEFITS”being paid out by successive governments People who are…” Sep 20, 18:16
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “It’s Sunday, Alf. Take the night off, why don’t you. If you give it a rest until the morn, maybe…” Sep 20, 18:13
100%Yes on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Salmond wasn’t perfect and some of the crap that came out of his month I questioned. Salmond isn’t a hero…” Sep 20, 18:02
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “If you think Scotland has been a republic for a number of years, and you think the union is a…” Sep 20, 18:02
Hatey McHateface on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “I’ve been critical of you before, Bob, but fair’s fair. You got the capital ‘S’ spot on there when you…” Sep 20, 17:58
robertkknight on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “A quick search shows no opinion polls in Scotland during the period 1980 to 2022 (Elizabeth’s death) showing a majority…” Sep 20, 17:27
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Colin Alexander, I apologise for your misspelt name above, the tech equipment is old and pleases it self. My apologies.” Sep 20, 17:05
Colin Alexander on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “My view is that the core foundation of the Scottish independence cause is Scottish sovereignty – the sovereignty of the…” Sep 20, 17:00
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Robertknight. Indeed the monarchs popularity is waning down south, he too seems to be afflicted as a king gone mad…” Sep 20, 16:55
James Che on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Colon Alexander. I have no idea why Alex Salmond favoured the English monarch when talking to him he never explained…” Sep 20, 16:35
robertkknight on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “The SNP has never been Republican in its outlook, despite the feelings amongst a sizeable minority of members. The popularity…” Sep 20, 16:22
Colin Alexander on A Thousand Islands In The Sea: “Did Alex Salmond ever give a credible explanation for swearing fealty to King Charles, despite the King’s UK Govt refusing…” Sep 20, 15:59
Mr Cairns just gets better and better.
Now this trans rubbish has been defeated,I would like to know why did so many high profile women stayed silent?
They followed Nicola’s lead……
He does, doesn’t he.
Brilliant
Women are adult human females
Bears do nasty things in the woods
The Pontiff is the head of the Church of Rome
Coming soon:
Alex Salmond was stitched-up by redactions.
And the scottish media is a bunch of worthless slithering lying mercenaries.
?? Brilliant
That’s a cracker.!!!
Who knew eh?
I keep on thinking of the myth of Babel and the sheer voluminous cacophony all this kerfuffle generated, the wholly fallacious reasoning of confirmation bias, the mass scamming and consequent mutilations and the endless queue of institutions and dullard politicians all signing up for this nonsense that said THEY were God!
That is some mess that is all going to have to be cleaned up. Psychotherapists will be engaged for aeons to come. Ker-ching. How sad. How sad it truly is for all concerned.
“Psychotherapists will be engaged for aeons to come”
You are not wrong Frank, for there is always a pathology associated with colonialism (Cesaire) which evidently has a significant impact on the colonized group psyche, as well as on the colonizer (Memmi; Fanon); indeed, colonialism ‘is based on psychology’.
link to yoursforscotlandcom.wordpress.com
Same shite as usual Alfie boy.
Plus the 736th link to some mince written by a closed, one track mind.
Change the record.
Thanks for the cartoon, Chris
Thanks for the link, Alf
Same shite as usual Chasie dick , still nothing constructive to contribute just like yir fellow yoonies fuckwit
It IS truly sad.
The damage that has been done.
The mess that has been created, for no ‘need’, only the ‘want’ of a few.
Shocking!
Very good!
Brilliant
Very supple Chris!
Well done.
Are Bears Catholic? lol
Well, as everyone who follows hand-egg (which America insists on calling football) knows the Bears come from Chicago, which has a pretty big Roman Catholic population. So the answer to your question is “Yes.”
Cracking cartoon today. I only woke up ten minutes ago so it took me a few seconds. Then the house shook as I laughed.
Next up for Supreme Court,
Can you ,in reality, be both British and Scottish,
can you exist in two different places at the same time,
or is that cognitive delusion and not based on fact.
As you imply, Scot, an imperial supreme court is seldom an appropriate place to consider opinion on self-determination of subordinated peoples and colonial territories. But then, the SNP elite appears ignorant of that fact as they have ‘never undertaken a reasoned study of colonial society’ (Fanon).
On the matter of a colonized people assuming another national identity as a key aim in the colonial hoax; yes, Indians, Kenyan’s, Irish, Scots and many other ‘peoples’ were made to think of themselves as British, and some still do. But as the author of ‘Culture & Imperialism’ Professor Edward Said explained, this is a ‘cultural illusion’, and for Scots a ‘false persona’ (Purves).
Here we return to the realisation that colonialism ‘is based on psychology’ and that among every colonized people there are those who “suffer from a dependency complex, who are psychologically made for dependence, who need dependence, they crave it, demand it” (Cesaire). There is no shortage of such people in Scotland, as in any colony, and who oppose thay’re ain leeberty an haud doun thay’re ain fowk.
Colonialism “is based on psychology”.
And there was me thinking it was based on nasty people with more or better weapons invading, destroying, slaying, imprisoning and evicting the rightful occupants.
Truly every day a school day on Wings BTL!
But let’s get the message out to the rightful occupants of that Eastern European country, currently in its fourth year of being colonised.
Tell them it’s all psychological messing in their heids!
The conflict you refer to occurred because, among other reasons, U imposed the U language on the R speaking community mainly in the east of the country and banned teaching R language and imposed restricted public usage of the R language in U.
Such linguistic imperialism is about imposing oppressive cultural change which in turn impacts the psyche of the oppressed group and in time alters their national identity.
Scots (and other colonized peoples) believing they are British/English is a case in point, and likewise arguably a consequence of cultural and linguistic imperialism. Hence as you say, “psychological messing in their heids”, and the condition known as ‘colonial mindset’.
Aye, Alf, “they had it coming” continues to be a staple of a certain cadre of the Indy supporters.
The central belt of Scotland is hoaching with English speakers. Many of them of recent English descent. Yet you frequently post on here that we in an independent Scotland must all read, write and speak Scots.
To be consistent then, you’ll have to support England when she invades, wrecks a quarter of the country, kills a few hundred thousand of us and kidnaps our kids to take them south of the border, so they can be taught their native country is an artificial construct with no right to exist.
I’ll be charitable and say you really haven’t thought this through. But only because it’s you.
“support England when she invades”
England has been here for ower three hunner year, after annexing Scotland in 1707. Why did you think Scots want independence?
It’s cargo culture Alf.
Ignore the trolls..
Young Lochinvar says:
“Ignore the trolls when they post awkward facts”
Sah! Yes sah!
Is that the recently defined Dempsie Paradox? , being in 2 different postcodes at the same time?
simply superb
bravo chris
Love it!
The evisceration of the deluded, wonderfully demonstrated, without any words required.
Robert Burns wrote that “Facts are chiels that winna ding”,
and three facts are
The Pope is a Catholic
Bears shit in the woods
A woman is an adult human female.
It says that something is amiss in our collective consciousness, when it was necessary to petition the highest court in the land in order to affirm the last of those three facts.
Politicians are captured entities. And democracy is a fallacy.
An we’re a’ doomed.
Brilliant
Some paid a high price in this insanity. Real bravery is standing up to the cult. Precious few so called representatives of the people showed that courage.
His best yet. ?
How come nay rocket surgery?
I wonder where all the righteous indignation from the straight, middle class Trans allies are when the outcome of this ruling is that the small number of Trans people have to use unisex toilets in the workplace (which most likely considering the small number of them, they and their team will be moved to the same floor which has them) and the hospitality industry offers something similar?
They can clear out the disabled toilets that were being used as storage.
LOL!!!
Thanks, I needed that laugh today! Pure brilliant!!
Very good Chris, thanks for the laugh!
Naked Emperor just out of shot.
Question:
If Trannies are to be afforded the expensive luxury of their own toilets, then what ISO Standards approved pictograms will the door sign have? A teapot??
A garden shears probably covers most variations.
Why? It’s only very recently that most people have come to realise that gender identity theory is based on what gender you FEEL you are on any given day, hour, week, month. That’s why the ideology destroys the entire concept of safeguarding of women and girls. No surgical operation is required.
“Mhairi Black: Misogyny underpins this ‘protecting of women and girls”
link to thenational.scot
——————————————–
Oh dear – failed SNP MP is not happy.
Good.
Correction – “failed Ex SNP MP”.
Who?
Brilliant depiction of the imbecility of the politicians that this needed to be shown to them, well done Chris
As a SOVEREIGN Scot I demand that EVERY POLITICIAN who voted for this abhorrent despicable GRA in HR RESIGN IMMEDIATELY for their REFUSAL to accept their abject stupidity and for the gross financial and socialogical impact this lunacy has wrought on Scottish society , are you listening Alex Cole scuttle “I DID IT FOR BETH” you moronic piece of shit
As a SOVEREIGN Scot I demand more money, a bigger house and some wheels powered by a V8.
I guess I will be just as disappointed as you, TH.
For now then, I’ll settle for some of what you’re drinking. Slainte Mhath!
Female Toilets. The Tranny’s favourite place until Wednesday. Have no fear Man in Skirt Swinney The Ass licker is crawling about the excrement as we speak.
Outstanding. Laughed so hard.
It doesn’t look good for those in support of Trans
link to archive.is
Straight from the horses mouth.
While this ruling was caused by a policy of the Scottish government, it was actually caused by Westminster by allowing woman’s safe space to be accessed by Transwomen.
Oh dear PacMan
That’s not going to go down too well with the John Bull constants on here 🙂
And James McBull, don’t forget the McBulls
Pacman, AFAIK, that’s why we now really need the GRA 2004 to be repealed. The GRA 2004 was installed under Tory watch, I believ
I’m sure I’ll be corrected if I’m wrong.
This is what Ruby who used to post here said all along.
It was brought in under Labour but the Tories could have replead it but haven’t. Both are culpable.
As to this current debacle, it was caused by the pretendy parliament in Holyrood, overseen by it’s colonial masters in Westminster.
But the Scottish government love the GRA 2004 so much that they would reduce the age to 16 and remove the obligation to have medical input!
That’s what an Independent SNP Government would have been able to do without challenge.
Yes, you are wrong.
Labour was in power from 1997 till 2010. Both the GRA (2004) and Equality Act (2010) were their shambles.
agent x says: 19 April, 2025 at 8:49 pm
Let’s imagine two scenario’s.
One with the what happened with the GRA level in place at Westminster level and one where the GRA legislation wasn’t introduced.
Which of these scenario’s do you think would make it easier and less political damaging for the SNP to introduce their legislation at Holyrood?
Lets imagine another scenario, the one you described under an independent Scotland. How much easier and less political damaging would it be for any political party to introduce the legislation without having the crutch of using another legislative bodies framework?
“While this ruling was caused by a policy of the Scottish government, it was actually caused by Westminster by allowing woman’s safe space to be accessed by Transwomen.”
—————————————————
The Supreme Court Judgment specifically states that the relevant Acts did NOT allow trans to access single sex places.
The horses mouth in this case did not understand the law that she drafted.
“(23) Invalidity of the Scottish Government’s Guidance
266. For all these reasons, we conclude that the Guidance issued by the Scottish
Government is incorrect. A person with a GRC in the female gender does not come within
the definition of “woman” for the purposes of sex discrimination in section 11 of the EA
2010. That in turn means that the definition of “woman” in section 2 of the 2018 Act,
which Scottish Ministers accept must bear the same meaning as the term “woman” in
section 11 and section 212 of the EA 2010, is limited to biological women and does not
include trans women with a GRC. Because it is so limited, the 2018 Act does not stray
beyond the exception permitted in section L2 of Schedule 5 to the Scotland Act into
reserved matters. Therefore, construed in the way that we have held it is to be construed,
the 2018 Act is within the competence of the Scottish Parliament and can operate to
encourage the participation of women in senior positions in public life.”
————————————–
The Scottish Government interpreted the Equality Acts WRONG.
How much, in the round, has been spent on this crap in the“UK” ?
As a whole?
How many public funded posts, so called “charities”, quangos, NHS funded operations cost and the list goes on and on.
Then how much have “UK” wide political parties benefitted from funding from lobbying organisations promoting this guff?
I’ll bet the latter is less than the former but wouldn’t it just be good to know how many “greenbacks” have changed hands over the course of this bourach and who the financial beneficiaries have been..
Politicians all claim they are transparent, so come on, and put away the redacting hidey-hole black pens eh?!
We’re waiting; elections coming up (here at least) an’ that..
Personally I applaud the WFS doing a Samson act and pulling their rotten temple down around their ears!
Tick tock degenerates; you’ve been rumbled..
Oh, VERY good, Chris.
Clever.
Thank you.
🙂
I see the First Cuck has convened a conference to highlight the threat of the ‘far right’. That’s something else I will file under ‘imaginary threats and distractions’.’ Perfectly in keeping with authoritarian regimes to manufacture fictitious enemies to distract from their own failings mind you.
First kuck
Replace the k with a c the 3rd letter c with an n and the last letter with a t
Sorted
Yassssssss!! Think that’s the first time I’ve properly laughed out loud at a print cartoon
Excellent work from holiday boy
When will it sink into the few genuine Transvestites that they have been completely and utterly used by the Scottish government for it’s own purposes.
Whatever else you think of this site, the cartoons are bloody excellent.
If we are going to have special toilet facilities for biological men who believe they are women, what about other people who believe they are something they are not?
If I believe I’m actually Louis XIV of France will there be a golden chamberpot provided with a servant to wipe my reeking fundament?
What about other people who have delusions? Will they get special facilities too?
Historically we did have special facilities, they called them asylums.
Chris, I just saw this and I think this is the funniest piece of political satire I have EVER seen. I’ll be laughing all day.