The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The ultimate videogame

Posted on March 07, 2011 by

Get a load of this monstrous boss enemy. Yikes! It's a bit like if Salamander had been written by HR Giger. It'd certainly give me the heeby-jeebies at the end of a tough-level of bullet-hell shmup, or worse yet, if it came hurtling down a corridor at you in some survival-horror FPS. But do you know the most terrifying thing about it?

YOU'VE ALREADY GOT ONE OF THESE LIVING INSIDE YOU.

That's because it's a human heart. And I know this because I've just been reading up on one of the most startling, amazing things I've ever seen, and given that it's been around since 2009 I'm completely astonished I haven't heard anything about it in the gaming media before now, because what with Bulletstorm turning everyone into rapists and suchlike you'd think it'd be exactly the sort of thing they'd want to make a big song and dance about.

BodyViz is an incredible piece of computer software that converts MRI and CAT scan data into a navigable 3D model of someone's body. It's not a general-purpose simulation, but the exact innards of a specific person, that can be rotated and zoomed and steered around using an Xbox 360 joypad – perhaps because it was written by videogame programmers.

I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP.

Clearly its primary purpose is medical. Currently, surgeons operating on a patient have to make their preparations for the op by working from blobby, often-2D monochrome CAT scans and MRI images that look like something out of a Jeff Minter game, which even to the expert eye can be vague and difficult to relate to the gooey red insides of a living, breathing person. (And one that you're very much hoping to keep that way.)

By way of illustration, the pics below are CAT and MRI shots respectively.

Now I don't know about you, but I don't think I'd find either of those all that massively helpful if I had the life-or-death job of cutting a tumour out of someone, because people tend to be inconveniently three-dimensional and something like brain surgery needs to be irritatingly precise.

What BodyViz does, though, is convert all the scan data into a full 3D model, whose benefits are better explained by the following video, particularly from 1m40s onwards, than I could manage in words.

You ARE all thinking the same thing that I'm thinking at this point, aren't you?

Namely, that it can surely only be a matter of the passing of a few short years now until you can go into hospital, be plugged into a big scanner, have a laser probe inserted into a vein, handed a joypad and given the opportunity to play the most mindbogglingly incredible videogame ever invented: Super Shoot Your Own Cancer Cells 3000!

Now, obviously none of us ever wants to have cancer. But man alive, if you did wouldn't you want to have a go at the malignant little bastard yourself? It'd be a bit like when Sean Connery's James Bond played Maximilian Largo at the electric-shock ultra-Risk game Domination in Never Say Never Again, only TO THE EXTREME! (Or indeed, to the Max. A-ha ha ha.)

I, for one, hope to still be alive in the future. But if and when I should die, I'd kinda like the last thing I ever saw to be the ultimate Game Over screen, and to leave this world with my thumb on a fire button.

0 to “The ultimate videogame”

  1. itsallcrap says:

    Game Over seems a little ambiguous.  I think I'd rather have the Resi 4 style "You Are Dead". 
    Just, you know, in case I wasn't sure.

    Reply
  2. Old Sam says:

    You know who really looks like assange?  John Inman…. google it, seriously.

    Reply
  3. Jon says:

    I couldn't play it with that framerate.

    Reply
  4. Bear or bust says:

    Who thought that Microcosm would hopefully be doable in real life.

    Reply
  5. AFMG says:

    Dude, I want to play and get a 1Up!

    Reply
  6. Derek says:

    So basically you want a remake of Microcosm?

    Reply
  7. MelonManga says:

    I don't want RevStu to die!

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,990 Posts, 1,253,017 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Ach, what does food self-sufficiency and being better insulated from outside events matter anyway… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckr5yz2pqqppo It’s recommended to have 3…” Oct 23, 18:05
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “@Dan That is not a manifesto for independence, it’s a collection of bullet point assertions and facts (the veracity of…” Oct 23, 17:57
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: “I can only speak from personal experience. I (or the missus) has had Evoques, Range Rover Sports and a full…” Oct 23, 17:52
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “CC says: “People love to moan about Land Rover stuff, possibly with justification, but whenever anything’s gone wrong they’ve always…” Oct 23, 16:18
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “It’s easy to mistake a list of social, economic or cultural problems for proof of colonisation, but that isn’t how…” Oct 23, 16:15
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Chuckle at site prick Main complaining that I counted coal in the resources list. https://wingsoverscotland.com/return-of-the-fear/#comment-2778087 A day later site prick…” Oct 23, 15:48
    • Dan on Faces In Sand: “Yawn at CC’s no credible plan bs… If it’s a credible enough strategy for the UK to be run with,…” Oct 23, 15:42
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Much of it was faulty” An oft-repeated statement, but I have yet to identify what it means. My best guess…” Oct 23, 14:39
    • Spartan 117 on Faces In Sand: “To be honest I’m not sure many people *need* it explained to them, because the facts are blatantly obvious to…” Oct 23, 14:32
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: ““Half or more of the population living in or close to poverty levels” Ah Alf, as an academic you’ll understand…” Oct 23, 14:22
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “What you write is all true, Northy, but where’s the fun in being all grown up when we can be…” Oct 23, 14:11
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code, Regards Scotlands Constitutional position in a modern democracy it is to realise there is no requirement for Scotland…” Oct 23, 13:15
    • factchecker on Faces In Sand: “I know there is not an equal union. It would be both stupid and undemocratic. More importantly, nobody has been…” Oct 23, 13:09
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North Code. Again appreciate your response and keeping the debate polite and clean, They are not actually my own personal…” Oct 23, 12:37
    • Captain Caveman on Faces In Sand: ““Independence would bring political responsibility closer to voters, strengthen democratic legitimacy and allow Scotland to adapt its institutions over time…” Oct 23, 11:24
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “James, I haven’t replied to you. My earlier comment was a general observation about the modern independence argument, not a…” Oct 23, 11:10
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “Alf Baird, I suspect that the non – treaty of union issue and Colonisation issue will merge, for they become…” Oct 23, 10:53
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “MaryB: they also infected people already in hospitals by placing them in wards with uninfected patients. I remember the huge…” Oct 23, 10:48
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code. Thank you for your reply, I will answer your points one by one if I may. Firstly, We…” Oct 23, 10:43
    • Alf Baird on Faces In Sand: ““A convincing case for independence doesn’t need the colonial frame” How else can we explain to Scots: – the ‘union’…” Oct 23, 10:20
    • James Chey on Faces In Sand: “Fact checker. You are entirely correct in stating that there is no equal union, What you omitted by default through…” Oct 23, 10:10
    • Northcode on Faces In Sand: “I’ve been thinking about why the “Scotland is a colony” argument is actually counter-productive. A convincing case for independence doesn’t…” Oct 23, 09:43
    • James Che on Faces In Sand: “North code, Did not have time to respond fully to you yesterday, Which and what Sovereignty works nowadays and where…” Oct 23, 09:14
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Humza Yousaf has a new book out – just in time for Christmas – although it’s inconceivable that could ever…” Oct 23, 08:35
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Robin McAlpine claims Jackdaw will add 35 million tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere that wouldn’t otherwise have got…” Oct 22, 21:02
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Good post, Lorncal. As I’ve often observed, we should never underestimate the popularity of a government policy that enables people…” Oct 22, 20:32
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Faces In Sand: “Steven Bartlett (Diary of a CEO) extensive interview with VZ on 16 Oct 2026 www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x9dkYIRb58” Oct 22, 20:24
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “Excellent questions, Confused. Well worth repetition. How come you’re an EXPERT ON INTERNATIONAL LAW? How come you’re an EXPERT LEVEL…” Oct 22, 20:10
    • Hatey McHateface on Faces In Sand: “@Geri 1:04 I absolutely love your posts and so I’d like to help you out. Teach yourself what 24/7 actually…” Oct 22, 19:52
    • Lorncal on Faces In Sand: “H McH: it was noted post WW II that few people in any of the affected countries expressed pre war…” Oct 22, 18:47
  • A tall tale



↑ Top