Well, according to the very informed sources on the BBBC Scotland news site who are commenting about the referendum, we are broke, very very stupid, not capable of anything, have not a clue about voting rights, are very biased about english people, are wrong all the time, barely able to communicate, very uncivilised, extremely ungrateful, can’t count ever, should never be believed as we are compulsive lie’ers, not really capable of breathing without instruction, and proberly have’nt washed in generations.
Have I missed anything ??? oh yes, if we vote for independence we are not playing fair. At least we know what they really think of us.
It’s interesting, because if the above is accurate (no reason to doubt it) it tells me that the unionists think they’ll win.
My opinion is that there will be a yes vote approx 60/40. We appear to be fast approaching the end of the process period. That means the real debate has yet to begin. For us who favour Independence it will mean having to keep cool heads. Make no mistake we are about to witness the full, ugly lying machine of the British establishment.
It would be remiss of the British government if they didn’t try some kind of divide and rule in the next two years. Hopefully there will be a vision of internal devolution offered to the likes of the borders and the islands to counter any whitehall attempts at clinging on to Shetland, Dumfries, etc. More and stronger local government is a principle I want to see anyway in Scotland.
I have to admit that I don’t have a clue what the result will be. There is too many variables and lots of things can and will happen in the next two years. The media is very hostile to independence, however newspaper sales in Scotland seem to be plummeting. The BBC are bad, they ignore good things that happen in Scotland and have been backing up Lamont over universal benefits. On the other hand, I think they have lost some credibility in the last few decades. The unionist politicians, such as Lamont, have been getting personal with the SNP’s leadership recently, but there is only so much of this you can do before people get alientated with your negatively. The Yes campaign need to find a way to turn the more powers voters into definite Yes voters and say what the consequences of a No vote are, e.g a continual cut in the grant block, and no substantial fiscal and welfare powers etc.
I think the no campaign jumped the shark with Davidsons late entry. I always thought it odd, that as they do down Scotland – do they ever consider what it is they are actually saying? If any of the comments about Scotland being too poor etc etc – were even true for a second – who in Scotland would ever vote for Indy? No one would – by that yardstick – who in England would vote for Union? If it’s true what do the long suffering English get out of it. To listen to some comments, it’s certainly not a warm fuzzy glow by helping out an unfortunate neighbour. What does it say about this 306 year old Union that implies that Scotland has not advanced within the Union but acutally regressed?
In the end I reckon the no camp is simply about fear of change, fear of no longer being relevant, no longer having influence or power. Fear of it to the point that they can’t see the irony in their position and arguments.
I like to think of it now as Old Union Blues: People who are so obsessed with the past that they can’t see the present, much less the future, for what it is. They stare into the what-was as the reality of the what-is continues on around them. Tempted by their past, confused by the present and terrified of the future.
They started their arguments early not appreciating that this was the phony war. They have declared war on the status quo they had sought to protect and proceed to hackdown every pillar that supported the Union in the first place.
Their Union is dead – they just don’t know it yet.
Had a look at some of the comments on the BBC website. They’re disgusting all right, but I think they will do more to turn people off the unionist cause than persuade people to join them. You have to wonder what sort of a person would feel comfortable in the same camp as them.
Unionists have managed to convince themselves that Scotland cannot be a state. This ideology has, and been allowed to, develop over centuries and in essence that is its strength. I think we are seeing a realisation of this from them at present and they are struggling very badly to find coherent, rational arguments why Scotland should not be a fully self-governing country. I reckon the bitterness the unionists are displaying is part of this. Also, it is only really from the activity of SNP over the last 50 years or so, since the 1960s, that the unionists have had to face a challenge. At present, with the independence referendum looming, it is no longer a challenge but a threat. They have never had to deal with this threat before and are worried and are consequently lashing out at very good journalists and their opponents. Essentially they don’t know how to deal with it.
I wonder if the unionists will stop going on about these things now that they’re settled. For some (mysterious and yes, possibly mystical) reason, I can still imagine politician and tweeter alike continuing to complain about not getting their way. Their way which they’re not getting partly because the Scottish Government can dance around the unionists, but mostly because Scotland did not elect the unionists.
I’m just saying, some still think Rangers FC exists…
Partition of Scotland? Did those fools learn nothing from cutting the north of Ireland from the rest of the island of Ireland? Or indeed what it costs the world to keep the Korea’s apart; Cyprus? How many lives and livelyhoods lost there? and I’m sure if I really gave this some thought I could come up with some more.
Someone said something about only a fool doesn’t learn from history….
Jennifer – you’re right, only a fool doesn’t learn from history.
Which doesn’t say much about the people who voted for the Tory party, despite all warnings from the rest of us that they hadn’t changed. It’s particularly important that people who are not sure about independence but do want increased powers learn from that particular Tory government, when we hear cries of “vote NO and we’ll give you more devolution” from the unionists.
Alec Douglas-Home was lying then, and David Cameron is lying now. Let’s show the rest of the UK why Scotland was the only nation on this island not to be stupid enough to go back to the Tories after what they did the last time…
I just don’t understand why people in Scotland clearly recognise how awful the Tories are and therefore wouldn’t dream of giving the Tories power over them at Holyrood, but at the same time accept being governed by them from Westminster. Do they think the Tories are different down there or something?
It could be that they feel our distinct Scottish institutions (parliament and NHS and stuff) are a significant enough shield, though that sure does not seem like a long-term counter-measure to me. Weathering the storm until Labour are back in government is not exactly…in any sense different at all, now if it ever was. Especially if powers end up being snatched back from Holyrood.
To paraphrase Burns,
Awa’ Tories, awa’! Ye”ll do nae gude at a’.
Thank you Ritchie. That’s the quote I was looking for. The sad thing is these lunatics in London know the past and still want to repeat it. A quote from The West Wing I liked is “the first sign of madness is repeating the same action and expecting a different outcome.
With the No campaign being led by Lamont and Davidson and some other chap, Rennie I think his name is. And all three of them becoming increasingly desperate just to think of something to say (mostly the wrong thing) I think Eck’s tactic of playing the elderly boxer who takes all the punishment from his opponent for 11 rounds and then comes out in the 12th (2014) to deliver the knockout punch are working beautifully.
Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.
TURABDIN on A matter of class: “A MATTER OF OPTICS, a Spectator message from the former Polish ambassador «to London», https://archive.ph/bG0Qa Should have gone to spec…” Dec 27, 13:26
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “The irony that both the sets of politician in Scotland and England disclaim king James as nothing but a pretend…” Dec 27, 13:25
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Colin Alexander, If you go into the Irish parliaments old records you will find the Anglo- Irish treaty 1800. That…” Dec 27, 13:00
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Colin Alexander. The UK constitution is that of the parliament of England and Ireland, not Scotland. 1: because there is…” Dec 27, 12:26
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Nice neat Dicey theory, Except the Monarch of England was the Monarch of England passed by the laws of parliament…” Dec 27, 12:04
factchecker on A matter of class: “James says the UK Parliament says ”We did not ask the Scots to join, because in all probability they would…” Dec 27, 11:56
Alf Baird on A matter of class: “….and consequently, (as we see in Peggie v NHS Fife and in so many other instances) all institutions in a…” Dec 27, 11:56
Northcode on A matter of class: “” It is certainly not something that the international community would either welcome in a newly independent Scotland or accept…” Dec 27, 11:45
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Scotland is a Colony by deceit, not Due to it actually being a Colony, but because the propaganda knew Scottish…” Dec 27, 11:33
Colin Alexander on A matter of class: “ChatGpt: “Dicey’s claim of unlimited parliamentary sovereignty rests on long-standing judicial obedience to Acts of Parliament, not on any explicit…” Dec 27, 11:28
Northcode on A matter of class: ““Civic nationalism DOES represent the silent majority” If it’s silent how can it possibly be known if civic nationalism forms…” Dec 27, 11:23
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Due to the many records wrote down to make a Union puzzle theory fit the narrative that they wished to…” Dec 27, 11:17
Dan on A matter of class: “Franchise Fanny says: “Just like the troons and their allies in the TWAW debate you’ve actually convinced yourselves somehow that…” Dec 27, 11:13
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “The people in Scotland need to pay more attention to research and records of what has passed behind closed doors…” Dec 27, 11:06
Aidan on A matter of class: “Indeed Andy and as far as I am aware there isn’t a single example of a country anywhere in the…” Dec 27, 10:49
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “Westminster parliament in England is fully aware that their actions in Scotland over Centuries wobble on a axis and pivotal…” Dec 27, 10:45
James Cheyne on A matter of class: “And all this going on while Westminster parliament Hansard records in the Select Committee make Statements like the following in…” Dec 27, 10:36
Andy Ellis on A matter of class: “So what values would you prefer Scot? You’d prefer to live under the benevolent rule of Uncle Vlad or Chairman…” Dec 27, 10:16
Dan on A matter of class: “Stuff going on in Scotland. https://www.isp.scot/december-20th-december-26th-2025/” Dec 27, 10:00
Andy Ellis on A matter of class: “@Bilbo 8.02pm Civic nationalism DOES represent the silent majority though Bilbo. No amount of self referential posting by Professor Baird…” Dec 27, 09:47
Bilbo on A matter of class: “The third article was excellent and a lot I agree on, particularly Covid being used as a sort of ‘Jubilee’…” Dec 27, 08:27
Bilbo on A matter of class: “Ah, the one referred to as Franchise Fanny. You paint two extremes then push your narrative under a voice of…” Dec 27, 08:02
willie on A matter of class: “Absolutely Scott Finlayson. Germany. like in the 1930s is in absolute full swing rearming to the absolute hilt. The white…” Dec 27, 01:57
Saffron Robe on A matter of class: “A trio of very interesting articles, well worth reading – if a tad depressing!: www.ronpaulinstitute.org/europe-is-about-to-commit-financial-self-immolation-and-its-leaders-know-it/ www.brusselssignal.eu/2025/12/the-eu-could-be-gone-in-four-years-a-revolutionary-eruption-is-coming/ www.off-guardian.org/2025/12/23/land-of-confusion-the-great-reset-in-motion/” Dec 27, 00:12
Northcode on A matter of class: “I’ve opened all my pressies. I’ve had my Christmas meal. I’ve watched some Christmas telly, But now I really feel.…” Dec 26, 22:21
Northcode on A matter of class: ““I’m not a colonising colonist… I’m a civic nationalist,” said the colonising colonist.” Dec 26, 21:18
agentx on A matter of class: “For God’s sake how false can people on here be? All this Peace and Goodwill to all men. Why can…” Dec 26, 20:11
Anne on The Valley Of The Dolls: “Alex Salmond would have remained in charge of the SNP if we had won the referendum and this would have…” Dec 26, 19:38
Scot Finlayson on A matter of class: “European empire builders have r@ped and plundered the planet for centuries, turned the Earth red with the blood of `foreigners`,…” Dec 26, 19:35
Alf Baird on A matter of class: “So called ‘civic nationalism’ reflects this in the finding that (Bond 2015): ‘Many of those who contributed to the decision…” Dec 26, 18:59
Well, according to the very informed sources on the BBBC Scotland news site who are commenting about the referendum, we are broke, very very stupid, not capable of anything, have not a clue about voting rights, are very biased about english people, are wrong all the time, barely able to communicate, very uncivilised, extremely ungrateful, can’t count ever, should never be believed as we are compulsive lie’ers, not really capable of breathing without instruction, and proberly have’nt washed in generations.
Have I missed anything ??? oh yes, if we vote for independence we are not playing fair.
At least we know what they really think of us.
Vote YES, Vote SCOTLAND.
Alba Gu snooker loopy!
Yes, you missed the one (was it only one?) saying we’re too lazy.
Maybe need to add that to the mantra, except it sort of loses its snappiness.
It’s interesting, because if the above is accurate (no reason to doubt it) it tells me that the unionists think they’ll win.
My opinion is that there will be a yes vote approx 60/40. We appear to be fast approaching the end of the process period. That means the real debate has yet to begin. For us who favour Independence it will mean having to keep cool heads. Make no mistake we are about to witness the full, ugly lying machine of the British establishment.
The truth will prevail. Onwards and upwards.
It would be remiss of the British government if they didn’t try some kind of divide and rule in the next two years. Hopefully there will be a vision of internal devolution offered to the likes of the borders and the islands to counter any whitehall attempts at clinging on to Shetland, Dumfries, etc. More and stronger local government is a principle I want to see anyway in Scotland.
I have to admit that I don’t have a clue what the result will be. There is too many variables and lots of things can and will happen in the next two years. The media is very hostile to independence, however newspaper sales in Scotland seem to be plummeting. The BBC are bad, they ignore good things that happen in Scotland and have been backing up Lamont over universal benefits. On the other hand, I think they have lost some credibility in the last few decades. The unionist politicians, such as Lamont, have been getting personal with the SNP’s leadership recently, but there is only so much of this you can do before people get alientated with your negatively. The Yes campaign need to find a way to turn the more powers voters into definite Yes voters and say what the consequences of a No vote are, e.g a continual cut in the grant block, and no substantial fiscal and welfare powers etc.
I think the no campaign jumped the shark with Davidsons late entry. I always thought it odd, that as they do down Scotland – do they ever consider what it is they are actually saying? If any of the comments about Scotland being too poor etc etc – were even true for a second – who in Scotland would ever vote for Indy? No one would – by that yardstick – who in England would vote for Union? If it’s true what do the long suffering English get out of it. To listen to some comments, it’s certainly not a warm fuzzy glow by helping out an unfortunate neighbour. What does it say about this 306 year old Union that implies that Scotland has not advanced within the Union but acutally regressed?
In the end I reckon the no camp is simply about fear of change, fear of no longer being relevant, no longer having influence or power. Fear of it to the point that they can’t see the irony in their position and arguments.
I like to think of it now as Old Union Blues: People who are so obsessed with the past that they can’t see the present, much less the future, for what it is. They stare into the what-was as the reality of the what-is continues on around them. Tempted by their past, confused by the present and terrified of the future.
They started their arguments early not appreciating that this was the phony war. They have declared war on the status quo they had sought to protect and proceed to hackdown every pillar that supported the Union in the first place.
Their Union is dead – they just don’t know it yet.
Had a look at some of the comments on the BBC website. They’re disgusting all right, but I think they will do more to turn people off the unionist cause than persuade people to join them. You have to wonder what sort of a person would feel comfortable in the same camp as them.
“You have to wonder what sort of a person would feel comfortable in the same camp as them”.
Scottish Unionists
Unionists have managed to convince themselves that Scotland cannot be a state. This ideology has, and been allowed to, develop over centuries and in essence that is its strength. I think we are seeing a realisation of this from them at present and they are struggling very badly to find coherent, rational arguments why Scotland should not be a fully self-governing country. I reckon the bitterness the unionists are displaying is part of this. Also, it is only really from the activity of SNP over the last 50 years or so, since the 1960s, that the unionists have had to face a challenge. At present, with the independence referendum looming, it is no longer a challenge but a threat. They have never had to deal with this threat before and are worried and are consequently lashing out at very good journalists and their opponents. Essentially they don’t know how to deal with it.
I wonder if the unionists will stop going on about these things now that they’re settled. For some (mysterious and yes, possibly mystical) reason, I can still imagine politician and tweeter alike continuing to complain about not getting their way. Their way which they’re not getting partly because the Scottish Government can dance around the unionists, but mostly because Scotland did not elect the unionists.
I’m just saying, some still think Rangers FC exists…
Partition of Scotland? Did those fools learn nothing from cutting the north of Ireland from the rest of the island of Ireland? Or indeed what it costs the world to keep the Korea’s apart; Cyprus? How many lives and livelyhoods lost there? and I’m sure if I really gave this some thought I could come up with some more.
Someone said something about only a fool doesn’t learn from history….
Jennifer – you’re right, only a fool doesn’t learn from history.
Which doesn’t say much about the people who voted for the Tory party, despite all warnings from the rest of us that they hadn’t changed. It’s particularly important that people who are not sure about independence but do want increased powers learn from that particular Tory government, when we hear cries of “vote NO and we’ll give you more devolution” from the unionists.
Alec Douglas-Home was lying then, and David Cameron is lying now. Let’s show the rest of the UK why Scotland was the only nation on this island not to be stupid enough to go back to the Tories after what they did the last time…
I just don’t understand why people in Scotland clearly recognise how awful the Tories are and therefore wouldn’t dream of giving the Tories power over them at Holyrood, but at the same time accept being governed by them from Westminster. Do they think the Tories are different down there or something?
@Jeannie
It could be that they feel our distinct Scottish institutions (parliament and NHS and stuff) are a significant enough shield, though that sure does not seem like a long-term counter-measure to me. Weathering the storm until Labour are back in government is not exactly…in any sense different at all, now if it ever was. Especially if powers end up being snatched back from Holyrood.
To paraphrase Burns,
Awa’ Tories, awa’! Ye”ll do nae gude at a’.
Jennifer & Doug
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”
Too many people in Scotland (and UK) with short memories keep voting Labour.
Thank you Ritchie. That’s the quote I was looking for. The sad thing is these lunatics in London know the past and still want to repeat it. A quote from The West Wing I liked is “the first sign of madness is repeating the same action and expecting a different outcome.
“Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.” Albert Einstein
Clearly he had met a Unionist…
Rev
It’s actually 4-0 to the SNP given that the Unionists dinnae really want ANY question.
With the No campaign being led by Lamont and Davidson and some other chap, Rennie I think his name is. And all three of them becoming increasingly desperate just to think of something to say (mostly the wrong thing) I think Eck’s tactic of playing the elderly boxer who takes all the punishment from his opponent for 11 rounds and then comes out in the 12th (2014) to deliver the knockout punch are working beautifully.