The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The Sealand Gazette

Posted on January 28, 2013 by

Readers as alert as this site’s will no doubt have already noticed our latest addition, signified as it is by the rather jarring appearance of a Union Jack over in the central links column – The Sealand Gazette. It’s a Scoopit news-aggregator like Peter Bell’s fine Referendum 2014 (and others), but with a rather different theme.

The Gazette, simply put, records the many reasons why Scotland can no longer afford to stay in the Union. It was founded back in June 2012, then neglected for a bit, then taken up again, and then we belatedly realised that it had a greater relevance than its original purpose and gave it a bit of a brush-up.

If you ever forget what we’re fighting for (or against), it’ll remind you.

18 to “The Sealand Gazette”

  1. Cyril Matvech says:

    Hear that Mr Unionist? That is the sound of inevitability! The sound of your impending death. Goodbye Mr Unionist. With apologies to the Matrix.

    Reply
  2. Wullie MacRae says:

    So this is nothing to do with the Principality of Sealand, then?

    Reply
  3. Amanayeman says:

    Just had a look at the Sealand Gaz. Ergch! Now I’ll have to go and scrub my brain, If I have night terrors I’m blaming you Rev.

    Reply
  4. Bill C says:

    Rev- Not for the first time do I doff my cap.  The Sealand Gazette could be a very powerful weapon in our armoury.  Although it is a negative, scary place to be, it also explains why many of us want to govern ourselves.  I think the more people who visit it the better.  It could provide vital ammunition for independenistas in tens of thousands of conversations over the next 20 months. I salute you sir!

    Reply
  5. Fiona says:

    completely O/T
    I see that the new HS2 line will be costing £32.7billion at least and it only gets to Leeds. That works out at over £500 per head- well taking into account that Danny Alexander recently terrified us by stating it would cost us all £1 a head for independence does this now mean that we will actually all be £499 better off with independence according to Westminster figures- which we all know are a bit of a stranger to the truth anyway.
    Better Together must be some sort of centipede or else they would have run out of feet to shoot themselves in by now.

    Reply
  6. Vronsky says:

    O/T
     
    Here’s tae us, wha’s like us.  Well, San Francisco, actually.
     
    link to activistpost.com

    Reply
  7. Scott says:

    I see Alan Cochrane is spouting his usual drivel again

    link to telegraph.co.uk

    Reply
  8. Callum says:

    O/T sorry for daft question, but surely Scots aren’t footing 9% of the HS2 costs?  

    Reply
  9. James McLaren says:

    Callum

    Probably most of it by way of the unexplained hole that are taxes taken from Scotland for UK projects and costs [cost like Embassies and wars and other overspends]   

    Reply
  10. MajorBloodnok says:

    @Callum
     
    Yes, Scotland contributes over 9% of the UK tax base so technically we are paying for 9% of HS2, which would be fine if at least 9% of that investment could be in Scotland or benefit Scotland directly, which is clearly won’t:  I would be very surprised if the economic modelling they have done for HS2 shows any significant benefit stretching as far north as Scotland.
     
    This is only one example of where we pay taxes but do not gain from the use of said taxes and where we only get back what Westminster decides we should have.

    Reply
  11. Marcia says:

    Cochrane’s rant should have been titled; Press furious attacks on Nats shows their desperation.

    Reply
  12. EricF says:

    And, of course, you’d never find any such thing as criticism of the BBC in the Daily Telegraph:

    link to telegraph.co.uk

     

    Reply
  13. Philip says:

    Have you been keeping an eye on this particular example of the crap the empire is still doing? Just wondered if anyone had any thoughts:

    link to guardian.co.uk

    Reply
  14. Craig P says:

    Sealand Gazette looks like a good stick to go with the pro Yes carrot!

    As for HS2, I’ve never understood why it has to start in London. A triangle or v could more cheaply and quickly made between Manchester, Birmingham and Leeds, bringing huge benefits of interconnectedness to the north of England. Why does everything have to be set up to benefit London? Because if it starts there, HS2 will just suck more business London’s way.  

    Reply
  15. Amanayeman says:

    No,No, No. You haven’t been paying attention. As Channel 4 news told us the HS2 will benefit the North of Britain away up as far as Leeds and bring prosperity to the United Kingdom. Honestly, you cybernats

    Reply
  16. Cameron says:

     
    As I understand things, HS2 will be the realisation of an old European Transport Plan, which aims to “eventually” link Dublin to the continent. As usual with such ambitious projects, its implementation will, by necessity, be incremental. Also by “necessity”, the more peripheral European regions will be required to wait for their jam, which may or may not come tomorrow.

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,983 Posts, 1,252,019 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “@ am firinn says:30 September, 2026 at 8:58 pm “Exactly what legislature do you think passed the Scotland Act 1998?”…” Sep 30, 21:32
    • am firinn on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Exactly what legislature do you think passed the Scotland Act 1998?” Sep 30, 20:58
    • am firinn on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Remind me what institutions “Scotland” had to raise against these sections in 1998?” Sep 30, 20:57
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Apologies to Mark Beggan. I was 2 minutes later than you.” Sep 30, 20:05
    • agentx on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Adopting Alternative International Frameworks The review is explicitly tasked with examining alternative Law Officer models used in other jurisdictions. The…” Sep 30, 19:57
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “And he’s back. And he’s put the cracked record on again. Readers new to this saga might not know that…” Sep 30, 19:37
    • Ross on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Playing devil’s advocate… Who will the Lord Advocate be accountable to if not the Govt? The Parliament?” Sep 30, 19:34
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “When required to register for the daily attendance allowance. Just like in the HoL.” Sep 30, 19:07
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““This really is a “made in England” problem” Of course it is. How many times must we be told? Scotland…” Sep 30, 19:05
    • Alf Baird on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““which is what puts the Lord Advocate above the law” Indeed, which also tells us that it is not the…” Sep 30, 19:04
    • agentx on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “No major institutional or governmental objection was raised by Scotland against section 44(1)(c) of the Scotland Act 1998, which makes…” Sep 30, 18:36
    • am firinn on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “It’s all very well the Scottish Government consulting on this. However, s44(1)(c) of the Scotland Act 1998, which establishes that…” Sep 30, 18:01
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “« They will attend meetings of the Scottish Government cabinet only when required. »” Sep 30, 17:39
    • Mark Beggan on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““…only when required..” Required for what? Not that we don’t trust a word they say.” Sep 30, 17:37
    • Spartan 117 on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Hmm. To quote Mr. Spock, “Fascinating”. Entirely disconnected to certain recent going on, I’m sure.” Sep 30, 17:18
    • agentx on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Coincides with Murrell having legal aid withdrawn.” Sep 30, 16:40
    • robertkknight on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Must be an election in a couple of days and our rancid SNP Government needs to appear, I stress appear,…” Sep 30, 16:18
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “As a matter of fact, Andy, Memmi predicted exactly this in one of his publications. But I’m not telling you…” Sep 30, 15:45
    • Hatey McHateface on Whatever Can Have Happened?: ““the former judge leading the review is himself a former Lord Advocate” I see. Everybody else must have been already…” Sep 30, 15:37
    • Sean Duffy on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “There will be no meaningful change. The politicians have the police and the judiciary firmly within their grasp. They won’t…” Sep 30, 15:34
    • Willie on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Interesting nugget Colin Dawson about arrangemnts not so long ago being considered as ” appropriate “. Well according to Big…” Sep 30, 15:28
    • Stuart MacKay on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Sadly no. You forgot a pithy quote from a prominent intellectual who was working with the CIA.” Sep 30, 15:16
    • Andy Wiltshire on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “It’s colonialism! Am I the winner?” Sep 30, 14:50
    • Colin Dawson on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “In March 2026, just two months ahead of the last Holyrood election, the Scottish Government published an initial internal report…” Sep 30, 14:30
    • Willie on Whatever Can Have Happened?: “Cannot for the life of me guess why this has arisen Rev. Maybe Big John of the Independent minds she’s…” Sep 30, 14:15
    • Hatey McHateface on The Turning Point: “@Aidan You can see why it’s so important to sell the “colony” lie. Real former colonies don’t have to shoulder…” Sep 30, 13:52
    • Hatey Mchateface on The Turning Point: “Farage comes out swinging: “The state pension is not a handout, nor an act of government charity. It is a…” Sep 30, 13:34
    • Aidan on The Turning Point: “Yes and you could always take the view that since Scotland would be a new state, it cannot have any…” Sep 30, 13:26
    • Spartan 117 on The Turning Point: “A default and “clean start” would be utterly catastrophic and yet, arguably, the only remaining option for iScot to break…” Sep 30, 13:25
    • Spartan 117 on The Turning Point: ““Westminster has finally lost control” I’d argue we are already there, have been for several years and that most onlookers…” Sep 30, 13:20
  • A tall tale



↑ Top