The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The positive case for the [BLANK]

Posted on May 17, 2012 by

34 to “The positive case for the [BLANK]”

  1. Rolf says:

    I reckon they will go for Yes To Britain (or maybe Yes to the UK) and confuse the hell out of everyone.
    Both sides will be on the Yes side and there will be two questions on the ballot paper: 1st question. Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? – only one option to tick of YES; 2nd question. Do you agree that Scotland should remain a part of Britain? – only one option to tick of YES.
    That way both sides will win and we can all live happily ever after.

    Reply
  2. Peter A Bell says:

    They have a problem because they have to find a positive-sounding name for a campaign which is inherently negative. I’m not about to help them.

    Reply
  3. MajorBloodnok says:

    How about – “The positve case for North Britain remaining part of England.”

    Reply
  4. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “I reckon they will go for Yes To Britain (or maybe Yes to the UK) and confuse the hell out of everyone.”

    I think there’s a genuine possibility of this happening. A slim chance, maybe – ultimately I can’t quite bring myself to believe that they’re THAT stupid – but it could happen. Fingers crossed.

    Reply
  5. redcliffe62 says:

    What abut calling it Majority English Rule?

    Reply
  6. Domhnall Dods says:

    These would fit well with their campaign messages to date
    Delete “union” and add
    1) “continued generous subsidy from England”
    2) “bigger, better, world power”
    3) “1000 years of shared history”
    4) umm………
    I was discussing this in London last week with an ardent tory colleague and the essence of his argument was that centralised countries work better, the bigger the better etc. 
    So I feigned surprise and said ” you may have a point, yes you may be on to something……why not really go for it and centralise everything and have a United Europe? That would be fabulous”.
    He went into meltdown and started babbling about handing control to “foreigners” and how it was totally unacceptable for control to be somehwere “not in this country”.
    “ah” I said, “you’re a nationalist too?”
    🙂
     
     

    Reply
  7. Doug Daniel says:

    I think Rolf is probably right. It might sound daft, but it’s the kind of warped thinking they have. Just like the bizarre idea that a referendum question should focus on keeping things the same (“Do you think Scotland should remain in the UK?”) rather than changing things (“Do you think Scotland should be an independent country?”)

    Reply
  8. MajorBloodnok says:

    “The positive case for making sure we chaps can get a peerage when we’re past our political sell-by date.”

    Reply
  9. Ally says:

    The scary thing is – that people don’t realise that if Scots were to vote “no” – then do they for a naosecond believe that things WOULS remain the same? Like hell they would! 

    Reply
  10. Rolf says:

    The yestobritain.co.uk and .com domain names are still available to register so they’re either daft or it’s not that.
     

    Reply
  11. Dan says:

    Seems to me like they are not planning on running a pro union/Britain/uk campaign. They are going to run an anti independence campaign. Seems you can’t teach an old dogs new tricks. Here’s to two years of scare stories and fear mongering. In the end I think people may vote yes just to shut them up! 

    Reply
  12. Juteman says:

    Keep Englands Empire Constantly Happy.

    Say YES to KEECH! 🙂

    Reply
  13. Arbroath1320 says:

    How about one of these:
    1. Say Yes to keeping Scotland an English county!
    2. Say Yes to a retaining a North Englandshire Nuclear Weapons Dump!
    3. Vote Yes for more exravagant spending in London!
    4. If your happy and you know it clap your hands!
    Oops, sorry folks I kinda drifted off there for a minute. 😀

    Reply
  14. An Duine Gruamach says:

    Yes to Trident?

    Reply
  15. Aplinal says:

    The positive case for the continuation of 300 years of exploitation, manipulation, robbery, subjugation, and sneering suppression.  Ah yes … “our” shared history!

    Reply
  16. Doug Daniel says:

    Perhaps it’ll be TURKEYS: VOTE “YES” TO CHRISTMAS!

    Reply
  17. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    I think AS has spiked their guns in that area.
     
    He has already patiently explained the social union and that we will still be part of Great Britain, which is a geographical description and he has started to close the United Kingdom door by saying we would, until a referendum post independence presumably, retain Libby and the monarchy.
     
    These need to be banged home though.

    Reply
  18. Domhnall Dods says:

    “Yes to Union – as long as it’s not European”?
     

    Reply
  19. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Empire Loyalists For Westminster.

    Reply
  20. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Loyalists for Westminster and the Orange Order
     

    Reply
  21. Dál Riata says:

    “… has undertaken public research on what to call the pro-UK campaign” 

    Does anyone have any idea what this “public research” entailed?

    Who are those of the “public” they speak of; online responders (What website?), people on the street, postal responders perhaps? Were they sent out/read out a list of prepared names and then asked which one they preferred? Were responders asked to make up their own title and offer that? How many people took part in the  “research” … Questions, questions!

    Is there any way that the method of this ‘public research’ and its results could be made, eh… public?

    Or, is “public research” just a euphemism for ‘We decided on a name ourselves, actually, and just pretended that we asked members of the public for their opinions because it makes the process look genuine and have more gravitas’?

    Reply
  22. James Morton says:

    The positive case for Inertia?
    Nattering Nabobs against Nationalism?
    Bloviating Windbags for Stagnation?
    Belligerent Imbeciles for HeeHaw?

    You couldn’t make it up could you? A decision is taken to hide the very thing they are campaigning for because it is seen as too negative. Trouble is, they still have to define and promote their idea, how can you do that if you aren’t willing to admit your pro-union? And come the day of the campaign to launch in earnest, what will we see? A cartoonishly inept displays of belligerent idiocy, wrapped in a UK flag, trawling out images of spitfires, chintz tea cups with the queen on them, Union Jack T-towels, all the strains of Andy Stewart singing “Scottish Soldier”

    I suppose when the ideas pantry is a little bare you have little choice but to scrape through the waste-paper bin instead.

     

    Reply
  23. Suth says:

    @Ally 
     
    “The scary thing is – that people don’t realise that if Scots were to vote “no” – then do they for a naosecond believe that things WOULD remain the same? Like hell they would! “
     
    This is the most important and worrying thing for people to realise before they vote. Things will certainly not remain the same. There’s no chance in hell they will even allow for the same events to play out. They will change the rules, put the finger on the scales and make sure that any future attempt will have to go by another path. It would be a far more difficult battle or a completely different battleground next time around. And that doesn’t even start on the obvious other changes that WILL happen in the short and long term with everything else that government can get involved with (law, services, taxes, etc.).
     
    A vote for “No” is still a vote for change and not a vote for it to remain as is forever. The “No” camp are careful not to let too many people realise this as their campaigning hinges on various things of the past or present that are gone or in danger of being dismantled or undone.

    Reply
  24. william says:

    I would like to see them use “For a Greater England”, why be alone when you can be part of a Great England. It would save a lot of time and would help our Independence YES. campaign. Yes they should replace “Union” with “Greater England”. I would certainly vote Yes to an Independ Scotland.

    Reply
  25. charlie says:

    the-positive-case-for something pink and fluffy?

    Reply
  26. Seasick Dave says:

    I just think its nice that they love us so much that they don’t want us to leave.

    Reply
  27. Domhnall Dods says:

    “Vote no for something nice (but as yet undefined) which I’m afraid we can’t tell you about until after you vote no”?

    Reply
  28. Tormod says:

    A wee thought the no camp uses YES to … Folk on the ballot paper will see YES / NO what if folk instinctly vote YES when they might actual want NO?

    Reply
  29. Longshanker says:

    How about:
     
    You think we’re contemptuous of the sovereign Scots and their wee Parliament? Whit’s McAlpine’s and Salmond’s excuse?
     
    Or.
    Would you put Pinot Grigio before your duty to your country?
     
    Or
    What’s independence for when you have Leveson and Westminster to hide behind?
     
    This is an important point people. The Unionists may show contempt for independence, but I don’t think I’ve seen such brazen contempt for parliament as that shown by the Nationalists Joan and Alex.
     
     

    Reply
  30. Craig P says:

    Ah, the positive case for a negative argument. I think we have already heard the campaign slogan, which is ‘stronger together, weaker apart’. To which my response would be ‘Scots are stronger together, but weaker a part of Westminster’.

    Reply
  31. TYRAN says:

    The “No to Scotland” parties

    Reply
  32. Clawd Baws says:

    How about ‘No To Separatism’ on the basis that a double negative is a postiive?  It’s logic Jim, just not as we know it…

    Reply
  33. jake says:

    They’ve been advised by their lawyers that to use the word “union” might be challenged in the courts on the basis that it’s not a union and never was. It was annexation.

    Reply
  34. passo says:

    link to dailymail.co.uk
     
    link to independent.co.uk

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,787 Posts, 1,221,993 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • 100%Yes on According As We Need Them: “For those interested in Scotland, the message about the union is making its mark. https://menafn.com/1109571674/Scotlands-Constitutional-Status-Revealed-As-Legal-Fiction-Experts-Confirm-Basis-For-UN-DecolonisationJul 15, 08:06
    • DaveL on According As We Need Them: “‘…on the route to liberation, I reckon mime and interpretative dance are the only way to go.’ Can you explain…Jul 15, 02:20
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “Poetry is all very well if you’re into that sort of thing. But when it comes to illustrating the oppressed…Jul 15, 00:17
    • Confused on According As We Need Them: “guy charged was an “aussie”, in a kilt; maybe done an ancestry.com and got told he was “connor macleod of…Jul 14, 23:32
    • Confused on According As We Need Them: “I was never an inmate unlike yourself. Did we meet? – if they had held onto the asylums we could…Jul 14, 23:20
    • Confused on According As We Need Them: “there was a young poster on wings cheap snarky disruption his thing agent x was his name the union his…Jul 14, 23:18
    • Alf Baird on According As We Need Them: “Development of poetry in the native tongue forms a key part of the liberation process and in understanding the colonial…Jul 14, 23:01
    • agent x on According As We Need Them: “@ James What in particular did you find Excellent?Jul 14, 22:00
    • James on According As We Need Them: “Excellent, Northcode. Keep ’em coming.Jul 14, 21:50
    • James on According As We Need Them: “Funny how the unionist rag describes the removal of the stone from a thief as ‘notorious’….Jul 14, 21:48
    • Gribble on According As We Need Them: “On the subject of intimidation on the stump, the impression as often given that this is a worsening problem. But…Jul 14, 21:39
    • Northcode on According As We Need Them: “Excellent article about a young Martinican psychiatrist’s time studying with the great Francesc Tosquelles at the Saint-Alban psychiatric asylum. Thanks…Jul 14, 21:30
    • Breastplate on According As We Need Them: “John Main, You Unionists seem to routinely register your disapproval on the reliance of 300 year old documentation, but accept…Jul 14, 20:43
    • agent x on According As We Need Them: “@ Northcode I notice there has been minimal, or maybe make that no support or encouragement for your poems on…Jul 14, 20:15
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on Just Good Friends: “In case you are unaware (and for comparison): WAR O THE WARLDS By H. G. Wells – Owerset intae NOR-EAST…Jul 14, 20:11
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “Enjoying your use of iambic quadrameter, NC. And your random departures from it too. If you’re taking requests, highlights from…Jul 14, 19:49
    • Northcode on According As We Need Them: “I posted one of ma braw poems recently about the demon Nuckelavee being cawd up fae the depths o’ the…Jul 14, 19:38
    • Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: ““trying as usual to undermine anything about Scotland” You should read Rev Stu’s articles and not just jump straight to…Jul 14, 18:06
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “In this heat you need to be eating salads.Jul 14, 17:55
    • twathater on Just Good Friends: “Wow the yoonies are out in force trying as usual to undermine anything about Scotland ,they’re like wee yapping dugs…Jul 14, 17:35
    • Dan on According As We Need Them: “In a bid to disrupt mental Main’s posting stream… Related to this article, there’s a fair few quid being spaffed…Jul 14, 17:14
    • Mark Beggan on According As We Need Them: “The Gravy boat is just a woke away. Just a woke away Just a woke away Just a woke away.Jul 14, 16:55
    • Mark Beggan on According As We Need Them: “I’m getting out of here. They’re all mad!Jul 14, 16:54
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: ““can a thief be robbed?” Now I’m confused, Confused. You have stated on here many times that when it comes…Jul 14, 16:48
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: ““nothing of the colonizer’s is appropriate for the colonized” Stand out post from Professor Baird. Anybody with him on calling…Jul 14, 16:20
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: “Nice try, NC, but easily discounted, as you have failed to provide any evidence for your assertion that Scotland’s high…Jul 14, 16:01
    • Hatey McHateface on According As We Need Them: ““Scotland as a Lunatic Asylum” When Confused writes on a subject so aligned with his own, lived experience, it behoves…Jul 14, 15:51
    • Hatey McHateface on Just Good Friends: “Another post from Confused enthusing over the idea of a bankrupt and socially fractured England just south of our unprotected…Jul 14, 15:47
    • Confused on According As We Need Them: “mythology – when Edward 1 stole the stone of destiny it was to make himself legitimate, for a “true king”…Jul 14, 15:21
    • James Cheyne on According As We Need Them: “Northcode. The trouble with ignorance is that it can, if left unfettered become an indoctrination of the mind. Even if…Jul 14, 15:01
  • A tall tale



↑ Top