The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The phantom referendum

Posted on November 08, 2011 by

The theoretical possibility that the UK Government could usurp the Scottish Government and hold its own referendum on Scottish independence is one that's been kicking around ever since the SNP won its historic majority at Holyrood back in May. But one question that nobody seems to have asked is "So what?"

Much of conventional wisdom has it that only the UK Parliament has the ability to grant Scotland independence, and that the Scottish Parliament can't legally bring about the dissolution of the Union. This is essentially a fallacy, based on misunderstanding of the sovereign nature of the Scottish people, but is generally held to be an academic technicality anyway – should a referendum conducted by Holyrood indicate the desire of the Scottish electorate for independence, the idea of Westminster even attempting to refuse would in practice be unthinkable.

But were Westminster to conduct its own vote, would the situation be any different? It's hard to see how. It was recently claimed by the Tories' Lord Forsyth that Alex Salmond had told George Osborne the SNP would boycott any Westminter-led referendum. This would throw up a pretty interesting constitutional brouhaha by itself, but let's assume the referendum went ahead in 2012, the SNP did indeed refuse to collaborate in it, and let's say for the sake of argument that as a result it delivered a resounding "No" vote on a very low turnout. What then?

The UK would continue business as usual (assuming there hadn't been a civil war), and soon enough would arrive at 2015. At which point the SNP would table the referendum for which the Scottish electorate gave them an overwhelming mandate, and invite the UK Government to try to stop it.

It's difficult to identify any legal grounds on which Westminster would be able to block a referendum which the Prime Minister had repeatedly acknowledged was Holyrood's to hold. Short of Cameron sending in the tanks, the second referendum would go ahead regardless of the result of the first. The constitutional sovereignty of the Scottish people would remain unchanged, as would the unthinkability of any refusal by Westminster to accept the result. Once again, beyond military conflict there simply wouldn't be any way to keep the Union together.

(It's not even as if there isn't extremely recent precedent on these very islands for having two referenda on the same subject in the same country in close succession. Less than 16 months separated the people of the Republic Of Ireland's rejection of the Lisbon Treaty from a second vote in which it was accepted.)

So we're going to go ahead and say with some confidence that there will be no Westminster-conducted referendum on Scottish independence. That it would be democratically outrageous ought to be reason enough, let alone that it would likely be highly counter-productive, but more importantly it would be also completely pointless. Only Holyrood has a mandate for a referendum, and only Holyrood – on Holyrood's own terms – will conduct one.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,674 Posts, 1,203,623 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Young Lochinvar on What Went On: “Another faux ball and chain to add to our ankles to say we just canae cut it..Nov 30, 01:16
    • G m on What Went On: “Aye, sure Robert. Sure it is.Nov 30, 01:05
    • G m on What Went On: “I would not dicht my shuch with the paper on which it is written.Nov 30, 00:56
    • G m on What Went On: “Why weren’t we encouraged to fill the space around St Giles cathedral? With sound provided outside for the crowds? It…Nov 30, 00:36
    • George Ferguson on What Went On: “Careful it was the heritage and skills of English craftsmen that were prevalent in the restoration of Notre Dame .…Nov 29, 23:46
    • gregor on What Went On: “The Beatnuts (Featuring Greg Nice:) Take It Or Squeeze It. No Escapin’ This: “Pass the mic to big Psych, the…Nov 29, 23:36
    • Robert Matthews on What Went On: “Seems like latent homosexuality on your part Nae Need, all your talk of “violent desires/compulsions” and “cocks in frocks”. Maybe…Nov 29, 23:05
    • Shug on What Went On: “I thought she did a good job during covid. However perjury, perverting the course of justice, cover ups lying redacting…Nov 29, 22:57
    • Mark Beggan on What Went On: “It could just be a phantom pregnancy.Nov 29, 22:47
    • SteepBrae on What Went On: “Well done to France. National pride. Time we got ours back.Nov 29, 22:39
    • SteepBrae on What Went On: “Yes, it’s a nightmare at times. Everyone is different but, from experience, I have no doubt that when someone feels…Nov 29, 22:31
    • Ian Brotherhood on What Went On: “And who’s to say they won’t find a way to stop Trump taking office? Neo-cons don’t give a fuck about…Nov 29, 22:08
    • Mac on What Went On: “Speaking to nurses in this field about that… they say that some days they think it is worthwhile and others…Nov 29, 21:51
    • Mac on What Went On: “Well as someone living this nightmare I will disagree. It starts off with you thinking this is manageable but I…Nov 29, 21:27
    • Mac on What Went On: “(Apologies mods screwed up the email address yet again) Pity I would have liked to read that. The guy Nima…Nov 29, 21:08
    • SteepBrae on What Went On: ““I support it in principle (as I do abortion) because people with severe dementia and other horrible diseases have negative…Nov 29, 21:07
    • Breeks on What Went On: “OT But something positive for once. Congratulations France, and a worthy salute to your Tradesmen and Professionals as Notre Dame…Nov 29, 21:06
    • meg merrilees on What Went On: “Naw, yir a’right BL Mac – the First Meenister says men cannae get pregnant!Nov 29, 20:25
    • George Ferguson on What Went On: “I grew up with 3 strong men ruling the street. Now anything goes or at least that’s what Holyrood thinks.…Nov 29, 20:19
    • meg merrilees on What Went On: “Sadly, Mac, what will happen is that palliative care and care homes will receive even less funding and as more…Nov 29, 20:17
    • Republicofscotland on What Went On: “Godley was akin the Val McDermid – a good buddy of Sturgeon the Judas, that’s why the foreign media in…Nov 29, 20:17
    • Nae Need! on What Went On: “I couldn’t agree more, George. Except men have been coerced (socially and legally) into feeling terrified of the consequences of…Nov 29, 20:05
    • Dan on What Went On: “Don’t be dissing Karens in Bimmer X5s too much. They do a valuable service to society as the ridiculously wide…Nov 29, 20:02
    • John H on What Went On: “And some ruthless relatives will try to use it too.Nov 29, 19:57
    • Nae Need! on What Went On: “Watched this too. I did post a very long reply but moderation gobbled it up like a hungover alkie, eating…Nov 29, 19:43
    • Dan on What Went On: “Logan’s Run Carousel managed to enthuse folk to celebrate the idea of “renewal” at a much earlier age. www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG_0hhckDSU After…Nov 29, 19:39
    • BLMac on What Went On: “I’m deeply concerned at discovering men can be come pregnant. Should I demand my wife wear a condom?Nov 29, 19:39
    • BLMac on What Went On: “Would this be a good time for the court to rule that the earth is flat, Pi =3, and that…Nov 29, 19:36
    • George Ferguson on What Went On: “A madness that nobody in Scotland can escape. For those of you that have Grandaughters. This is a big worry.…Nov 29, 19:29
    • Mac on What Went On: “It makes sense though… we have an aging population because of abortion. So the obvious solution is start killing the…Nov 29, 19:23
  • A tall tale



↑ Top
260
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x