The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The independence debate at a glance

Posted on April 24, 2014 by

Three years summed up in two tweets:

As a rule, only one of these stories would get printed.

(We’re kidding, of course. Normally the media isn’t nearly that balanced.)

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 24 04 14 12:53

    The independence debate at a glance | FreeScotland

64 to “The independence debate at a glance”

  1. I was surprised & happy James Cook put the positive case in his tweet, instead of the ‘warning’ & dooms laden headlines we’ve been used to lately. First time I’ve seen that way round.

    Reply
  2. Mary Bruce says:

    Haha, I thought this was going to be the post with the collection of all the best bits from the last 2 years…

    James Cook is worth following on twitter, he probably is the most balanced voice that the BBC has in the debate.

    Reply
  3. Kenneth Shaw says:

    Parallel universe theory in action ?

    Reply
  4. bunter says:

    And nothing will change all the way till Sept 18. It will be so important that people will be able to access online research with links to independent facts and figures, which we know are out there, that proves to NO’s and undecided’s that we can indeed be independent.

    I saw a site simplify2014.com a few months ago which would do just that, and of course Wings is evidence based.

    It will be more difficult to get to those who don’t do internet, but I guess that’s where the YES ground campaign comes in.

    Reply
  5. Clootie says:

    If anyone thinks James Cook is the most balanced then it just highlights how bad the rest are if it makes him look “balanced”.

    Reply
  6. heedtracker says:

    Scottish nation statehood will not happen, end of.

    Yours honestly, the BBC.

    Reply
  7. GrahamB says:

    I’ve always found Alan Little to be well balanced and perhaps leaning towards YES. He gave Flipper a roasting on Hardtalk at link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  8. Sandy Brownlee says:

    OT: It looks like RGU is now out of the CBI: principal’s blog (last paragraph)

    Reply
  9. Doug Daniel says:

    James Cook’s an alright guy. I quite like the way he sticks up for himself on Twitter as well. I certainly wouldn’t have him on the “List of BBC folk who should be sacked on the spot”.

    Reply
  10. heraldnomore says:

    Meanwhile the wee bauchle’s oot her bunker again…

    Reply
  11. LB says:

    I thought the Sun’s chief political correspondent made some interesting remarks on the debate earlier too:

    link to twitter.com

    Reply
  12. Peter Macbeastie says:

    Even ignoring the source, that pretty much is the entire debate.

    Westminster says we can’t, Holyrood says we can.

    Add in a wee bit of pepper (pensions, currency, EU etc) and you have yourself what David Cameron probably thinks is a debate. Having watched PMQ’s a couple of times, I can imagine how he believes debate is run. Say something stupid, then shout down anyone else saying you’ve said something stupid.

    Reply
  13. Luigi says:

    Normally the media isn’t nearly that balanced

    I thought recent Daily Express (pensions) headlines were perfectly balanced.

    Reply
  14. Jill P says:

    O/T
    link to bbc.co.uk

    Don’t they want to be Better Together?

    Reply
  15. MajorBloodnok says:

    @Sandy Brownlee

    Nice one. As I’ve said before, the CBI – the gift that keeps on giving.

    Reply
  16. Mary Bruce says:

    James Cook tweeted the excellent National Collective Daily Express pensions photo-montage the other day. Just sayin’.

    Reply
  17. Grouse Beater says:

    “Economic recovery?”

    Finding a penny of a footpath can be categorised as a “recovery” when the entire western world is almost bankrupt from a self-induced collapse in its economic system.

    Reply
  18. MJ says:

    Bunter, simplify2014 has as good as nothing on it at the moment and if they are just starting to put it together now it wont be complete before the referendum.

    Reply
  19. Molly says:

    James Cook has a piece on line just now, regarding the BBC and the CBI

    Reply
  20. Jamie Arriere says:

    Hey, this laddie Cook…going up in my estimation

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Brave!

    Reply
  21. Molly says:

    My post disappeared but James Cook has a piece on BBC online raising the issue of the BBC and CBI – hats off to you!

    Sorry if this is a duplicate

    Reply
  22. Jeannie says:

    My post disappeared too.

    Reply
  23. heedtracker says:

    This dude’s as balanced as all BBC in Scotland “broadcasters” are eg. link to bbc.co.uk

    So here we go and straight from BBC college of journalism/propaganda honours graduate we have “insisted, denied” as much as BBC online space allows-

    “Alex Salmond has insisted, He insisted a “yes” vote would be, Mr Salmond denied that his plans, He insisted that the real, danger” and so on.

    And then from same BBC ligger for Con/Dem/UKOK Carmicheal, or just one more pledgesigner on NO student fees etc Cooke writes,

    “Responding to Mr Salmond’s speech, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said HS2 was an argument for remaining in the UK.”

    Bish bosh vote no.

    Reply
  24. MajorBloodnok says:

    Aha, James Cook lifts the lid on the BBC and the CBI. Even better.

    Reply
  25. Les Wilson says:

    Would it not be interesting if AFTER a YES vote, and negotiations are complete and Independence day has passed.
    That the Scottish Government of the day sue the BBC for going against their own charter in an International Court?
    While trying to prevent Scottish democracy.
    Just a thought!

    Reply
  26. Jimbo says:

    Sincere apologies for going OT here:

    The Bannockburn commemorations being held at Bannockburn Battlefield, Stirling, on Saturday 28 and Sunday 29 June are in danger of being diminished due to the MoD insisting on holding Armed Forces Day at the same time in the same City.

    Appearing in front of the same committee, an official from the council revealed that the MoD named Stirling as the venue for armed forces day and insisted it be held on the same weekend as Bannockburn.

    link to tinyurl.com

    In view of the success of the 2013 March and Rally for Scottish Independence (circa 30,000 of us turned up – link to wingsoverscotland.com), and seeing as the 2014 March and Rally for Scottish Independence has been cancelled, hows about we use the Bannockburn venue as an unofficial independence rally?

    Get your Saltires back out of storage and turn up at Bannockburn – Then, when the MOD do their fly-over of Bannockburn Battlefield they’ll see that London’s attempt to thwart the Bannockburn event has failed completely.

    Further info here: link to bannockburnlive.com

    Reply
  27. Ian Brotherhood says:

    Too many comments…can’t keep up…RGU has finally left CBI?

    The BBC next up for shaving?

    Reply
  28. Indy_Scot says:

    Is James Cook’s apparent neutrality his own doing, or has the BBC put him up to it, to try and give the impression of some balance.

    Reply
  29. Minty says:

    RGU have ‘suspended’ their membership until the referendum. Didn’t one of their high heidyins have some links with the CBI?

    Reply
  30. Desimond says:

    Hoi Rev, pay your bills!

    link to bbc.co.uk

    Reply
  31. Clootie says:

    Why have The Royal Bank of Scotland and Clydesdale Bank not resigned from the CBI?

    Is this the official position of the banks – they support the NO campaign?

    Reply
  32. Robert Louis says:

    So, will the blatantly biased BBC now leave the CBI? Or will they just come clean, and formally join with the CBI in campaigning for a vote against the restoration of democracy and Scottish independence?

    As for Robert Gordon’s University, what does ‘suspending membership’ of the CBI ACTUALLY mean??? Or is it just spin? Devil is in the detail.

    Reply
  33. Muscleguy says:

    @Jimbo
    If you look at the registration and payment page for Bannockburn they expressly state that campaign badges, posters, flags etc and campaigning for either side in the referendum will not be allowed in.

    So your suggestion is a non-starter.

    Reply
  34. Les Wilson says:

    Jimbo says:

    Jimbo, totally agree with your comments, a bad state of affairs. Ref the MOD, this, for sure, would have been a Westminster instruction. It is purely to try and belittle an important part of our history.( they do not want us to have any pre union history!) Whoever is really responsible should be put in stocks at Bannockburn and had rotten eggs thrown at them.

    Reply
  35. Barney Thomson says:

    Business for Scotland’s pressure on the BBC over the CBI has just been on Reporting Scotland!

    Sally nearly coughed up her capuchino.

    Reply
  36. Jimbo says:

    @ Muscleguy:

    Thanks for the info.

    OK, forget the Saltires – we could still turn out en masse to make this event the success that London’s puppet masters hope it won’t be.

    Reply
  37. TJenny says:

    Barney Thomson – saw that. Sally Magnusson having to announce BBC/CBI membership position still to be responded to by BBC, really did stick in her craw – coughing through gritted teeth.

    Reply
  38. Molly says:

    Jimbo is a WOS / national collective t shirt ok?

    Reply
  39. Molly says:

    Jimbo is a WOS/ national collective t shirt ok?

    Reply
  40. TJenny says:

    If BBC don’t resign or, as RGU have done, suspend their membership of CBI until after the ref.,then shurely they can no longer be allowed to cover indy.

    Reply
  41. Ian Brotherhood says:

    Has a petition been started yet? No sense having more than one on the go – will the guy who did the RGU one get it on the go?

    Reply
  42. Ian Brotherhood says:

    RS/James Cook running it now on the news…here we go.

    ‘The BBC has yet to comment.’

    Reply
  43. Macandroid says:

    Re Stirling
    Go with Saltires and support our armed forces day. Might counter all the union flags if enough turned up?

    Reply
  44. Jimbo says:

    @ Molly

    I don’t see why not, Molly. Ill be wearing my WOS T shirt.

    You can buy them here: link to cafepress.com

    Reply
  45. ronnie anderson says:

    @Macandroid , quite aggree there, & make sure you’s are

    in numbers around the Camera’s positions.

    Reply
  46. hetty says:

    No way we could afford tickets to Bannockburn, but could prob be in Stirling on the day…is there a law saying we can’t wear our YES badges then? I might print a couple of saltires onto my white troosers as well…

    Reply
  47. fairiefromtheearth says:

    The Westminster Gov will always pay pensioners their pension what that monies will be worth is a diffrent matter.

    Reply
  48. Jimbo says:

    Actually, I think I prefer Macandroid’s suggestion – and have Saltires outnumbering all the others.

    Reply
  49. geeo says:

    Just to check I am not going mad, you can not take a saltire to Bannockburn celebration day ?
    But you can take a union flag to armed forces day, on the same day, during a referendum build up because one flag is showing political bias and the other somehow does not ?

    Imagine if Robert the bruce was told if he turned up to face the English at Bannockburn and was told, “sorry mate, you cannot come here dressed like that…..move on nothing to see here”

    The flag of our nation banned from a historical event in our nation’s history.
    Those union flags on armed forces day will presumably be banned if the Scottish part of the design is not removed then ?

    Reply
  50. TJenny says:

    I know their is a fundraiser for 10,000 Saltires, on the go, but can’t remember where. Perhaps the idea behind that is to flood Bannockburn with Scottish flags. And why not? If they tried to arrest all of us for waving OUR flag at Bannockburn celebrations – very, very, very bad BT publicity for their WW1 celebrations. After all, was WW1 not supposed to be a fight for our freedom?

    Reply
  51. Capella says:

    Just looked up the Bannockburn site and read that the Bannockburn celebration can’t be held on the actual date (24th June) because the National Trust are having the new Centre opening event on that day. Naturally that is a more important event than the 700th Anniversary of the battle. The date of the opening obviously can’t be moved but the date of the battle can. By an amazing coincidence, Armed Forces Day (wasn’t that Gordon Brown’s invention) is to be held in Stirling on exactly the same wrong date as the Bannockburn celebration. Armed Forces day marks the 70th anniversary of D Day and 2014 marks the outbreak of WW1 so many flags will be in evidence. I look forward to seeing the pics!

    Reply
  52. galamcennalath says:

    STV quit the CBI 4 days ago. The BBC are still thinking about it. Why didn’t they resign from it immediately? Rhetorical question – we all know the answer.

    Reply
  53. Alan Gerrish says:

    “If BBC don’t resign or, as RGU have done, suspend their membership of CBI until after the ref.,then shurely they can no longer be allowed to cover indy.”

    Logically this is absolutely correct, and the Electoral Commission should be alerted to this if BBC still have not resigned after the official campaign starts. However I can’t find any reference to broadcasters in the EC website, so yet again it looks like the state has it all sewn up.

    Deliberate, or what?

    Reply
  54. Helena Brown says:

    I smell something rotten in the National Trust, pressure put on them to alter dates and I would not go to the Armed Forces Day for that very reason. This is terrible that no Saltires are allowed, allowed for god’s sake at the site of the most important battle in our history. Robert Bruce will be turning in his grave, there will be an earthquake at the Abbey in Dunfermline.

    Reply
  55. haud on the noo says:

    They cannot stop people with Saltires. No chance.

    Reply
  56. Capella says:

    @ Helena Brown
    The National Trust is chaired by Sir Kenneth Calman, dad of Susan Calman, and formerly chief Medical Officer of Scotland and England. So perhaps there was no need to apply very much pressure? I would expect Stirling council is also very happy to combine these two prestigious events into one weekend – the wrong one.

    Reply
  57. craig watt says:

    @ Muscleguy

    “If you look at the registration and payment page for Bannockburn they expressly state that campaign badges, posters, flags etc and campaigning for either side in the referendum will not be allowed in.
    So your suggestion is a non-starter.”

    I have been all over the Bannockburn site and the ticket soup terms & conds . I can not find the info that you have posted above. Would you mind posting a link as I would like to take a flag (just a plain saltire) .

    Cheers C

    Reply
  58. Jamie Arriere says:

    Full terms & conditions of Bannockburn Live

    link to ticketsoup.com

    Nothing there about banning saltires, political banners etc

    Reply
  59. craig watt says:

    @Jamie Arriere

    Having a huge YES banner I could see causing some issues , but a plain saltire ! It is still the flag of Scotland after all .

    If Muscleguy could enlighten me with a link, I would appreciate it .

    Reply
  60. Jamie Arriere says:

    It’s probably the case that there’s no Yes Campaign (or Better Together) stalls at the event – knowing Stirling Council, it was probably a condition of the licence – but there’s nothing stopping paying customers turning up with whatever they want (except weapons, dogs, barbecues, professional video equipment etc as stated in the conditions)

    Reply
  61. wingman 2020 says:

    WTF? GET ME OUT OF HERE (UK)

    Barclays approved higher bonuses despite a 30% fall in profits. link to bbc.in

    Reply
  62. Tom says:

    You people are obsessed with claiming the BBC (and everyone who isn’t biased towards your opinions) is biased.

    They aren’t, they are probably one the least biased news sources (cue snorts of indignation).

    The guy tweeted two separate Yes and No arguments, how on earth can he be more unbiased?

    The BBC is obsessed with avoiding criticism and treading lightly, seems like Scottish nationalists manage to be so sensitive – or maybe disingenuous – that they can never be “balanced” enough, unless they are “balanced” in favour of the Yes argument and against anything that seems a bit Londonish.

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “The guy tweeted two separate Yes and No arguments, how on earth can he be more unbiased?”

      I don’t think anyone used those tweets as evidence of bias.

      Reply
  63. Croompenstein says:

    @Tom – We’re not obsessed just observant

    link to wingsoverscotland.com

    link to tinyurl.com

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,761 Posts, 1,218,387 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Andy Ellis on The shifting sands of memory: “The boundary change is a red herring. Until and unless Scottish voters grow a pair and take their independence rather…May 24, 15:53
    • Andy Wiltshire on The shifting sands of memory: “My tongue-out-of-cheek point is that either a newly independent Scotland (brought into existence by a court declaring the 1707 Act…May 24, 15:45
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “@Mia – “Korea” isn’t a “binary state”May 24, 15:45
    • AndrewR on The shifting sands of memory: “I’ve got a more sensible post below, but I was struck by the same point as Andy Wiltshire. I don’t…May 24, 15:31
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “Absolutely, James Cheyne. Which also brings up another question: if the UK of Great Britain and NI was a unitary…May 24, 15:06
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““Can you give me a give example of where the concept of a binary state is recognised in intentional law…May 24, 14:57
    • James Cheyne on The shifting sands of memory: “Dan, Having had a quick reminder after reading the link you provided, Question, if each territorial state remains in tact…May 24, 14:36
    • Dan on The shifting sands of memory: “Smith Commission report stated… “nothing in this report prevents Scotland becoming an independent country in the future, should the people…May 24, 13:08
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “Can you give me a give example of where the concept of a binary state is recognised in intentional law…May 24, 12:43
    • Dan on The shifting sands of memory: “I’m sure in a change from arguing about “ancient irrelevant guff” the unionists will be along any minute now to…May 24, 12:25
    • Xaracen on The shifting sands of memory: “A meaningless hypothetical question, Aidan, and one designed to confuse and deflect the unwary and the uncertain! You are constructing…May 24, 12:03
    • Captain Caveman on The shifting sands of memory: “You can bloody talk Park Bench Buckie Boy.May 24, 11:53
    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: ““Imagine there’s no countries.”May 24, 11:27
    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: ““time” “Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day. You fritter and waste the hours in an off-hand…May 24, 11:24
    • James on The shifting sands of memory: “*Sigh*…. Trolls gonna troll.May 24, 11:21
    • Captain Caveman on The shifting sands of memory: “A: Alf, with his faithful yet entirely imaginary ghostly cohorts of Memmi and Fannon ever present at his side will…May 24, 11:18
    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: “There’s no flys on Mark.May 24, 11:14
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “For C see B.May 24, 11:11
    • Alf Baird on The shifting sands of memory: “The only fantasy here is the ‘UK’, which is and always has been a colonial hoax based on a mankit…May 24, 11:02
    • Michael Laing on The shifting sands of memory: “@ Mark Beggan: Howsabout YOU “take up fly catching or some other useful pastime” instead of wasting your own time…May 24, 10:56
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “@ Xaracen I agree 100% with your comment (24 May 9:51). I also would add that if the first parliament…May 24, 10:49
    • Aidan on The shifting sands of memory: “@Northcode: what happens if c) Scotland is part of a single state, the United Kingdom?May 24, 10:27
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““some folk need to take up fly catching or some other useful pastime” How about you put to action your…May 24, 10:18
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: “Thank you Northcode. Yes, that is the main point I was trying to make. You have presented it much better…May 24, 10:16
    • Mark Beggan on The shifting sands of memory: “Reading all the fantasies on here about how ‘cleverly’ Scotland can be a ‘nation’. Ideas spread out like instructions to…May 24, 10:06
    • Xaracen on The shifting sands of memory: “The Treaty does not give succour to the dominance of England over Scotland, nor to the dominance of England’s MPs…May 24, 09:51
    • Lorn on The shifting sands of memory: “James: read all the speeches and workings around the Treaty. They make it very, very plain that the Union was…May 24, 09:49
    • Northcode on The shifting sands of memory: “Replying to: Mia 24th May @ 8:47 am I’ve quickly scanned your comment, Mia – I’ll read it with a…May 24, 09:43
    • Mia on The shifting sands of memory: ““Easily verifiable, public domain facts say: NO: 46% (as of May 2025) YES: 44%” By facts I guess you mean…May 24, 09:41
    • Lorn on The shifting sands of memory: “James, I am not saying that Scotland is not treated as a colony, just that the Treaty’s original INTENTION was…May 24, 09:30
  • A tall tale



↑ Top