The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


The guest editor

Posted on July 12, 2014 by

We assume Danny Alexander has been writing for the Record this morning.

record3bn

We still haven’t been issued with our special UK Goverment Scottish Independence Costs Calculator by the Treasury, but we nevertheless still feel fairly confident that £550 million minus £250 million is £300 million, not £3 billion.

It’s not just a clumsy typo where someone’s typed an extra zero, because it’s in the headline AND the text. And it’s not that someone doesn’t understand the numbers, because there are roughly a million households in Scotland and £300m would therefore indeed be roughly £280 for each one.

(The article is abominably written, and the £550m must in fact logically refer to the whole UK, not the rest of the UK, but that doesn’t explain the discrepancy.)

We won’t get into the debate about whether the underlying claim is true – we’re just focusing on the arithmetic on this particular occasion. But it’s interesting to note how the No campaign are ramping up the threats.

It’s only three months ago, after all, that the UK government was solemnly issuing warnings that a Yes vote would see energy bills increase by “between £38 and £189”, again specifically because of green subsidies. Now the highest end of that estimate has been hiked by a whopping 50%, even before the Record multiplies it by 10.

By September, we expect a warning that we’ll all have to set fire to our children just to stay warm. The Daily Record is clearly impatient to cut to the chase.

146 to “The guest editor”

  1. heedtracker says:

    So much for the Daily Record starting decent coverage of Scottish democracy. It will never be forgotten.

    Reply
  2. Chris Paton says:

    I thought it meant UK paid £550 million and Scots £250 million, totalling £800 million. Still not £3 billion – and frankly, I’ve long stopped believing any of this too wee, too poor nonsense anyway.

    Reply
  3. donald anderson says:

    In EBC breakfast time this morn the money man was waffling on about pensions in an Independent Scotland. Neither he nor the presenter could hide their sneers. His reference to the Scottish NationalIST Party is more than a sematic error and all too common.

    Reply
  4. GrahamB says:

    Things are looking up! The 12x exaggeration factor is now only 10x so perhaps in a century or two it might come down to parity.

    Reply
  5. James123 says:

    For those who keep saying the DR is changing, dream on.

    Reply
  6. Grouse Beater says:

    Threats, ridicule, and cold condemnation of rights.

    Kurrist! How those bastards hate democracy at work.

    Reply
  7. Capella says:

    The “thinking” must be that, since the previous dire warnings have not killed the YES vote stone dead, then even direr warnings should be issued. The direst warnings will be reserved for end of August.
    Seriously, is anyone listening to all this hysteria?

    Reply
  8. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Incidentally, Professor Hughes has something of a history of doom-laden warnings about the cost of green energy, in or out of the UK:

    link to research.ed.ac.uk

    Reply
  9. Sinky says:

    Brian Wilson also harking on about this in Scotsman .. must be the Poorer Together press release of the day.

    One thing is certain fuel bills will rise with we vote No to pay for the vast nuclear power subsidy.

    Its strange that a UK minister part of a government that has agreed a subsidy for new nuclear power stations in England of over £90 a megawatt hour should hold the Scottish government to account for subsidising its own renewables at less than half this cost – and also achieving binding EU targets that the R-UK will spectacularly miss.

    Scottish renewables are getting cheaper over time but the reverse is true in England and Wales as the R-UK switches to expensive offshore wind and small scale PV. The subsidy cost of all Scottish renewables in 2020, not just the farms installed after independence, will be about £44 a megawatt hour compared to £93 in England and Wales.

    link to scottishenergynews.com

    Reply
  10. Ken500 says:

    Daily Record tut tut

    Scotland is surplus in fuel and energy exports 25%.

    The rest of the UK benefits from Scottish fuel and energy. It also helps the UK balance of payments.

    Westminster blocks investment in EU renewable grants to Scotland. Chinese investment is used by Westminster, for more expensive Nuclear energy.

    Any investment in Scottish energy benefits the rest of the UK. Scotland pays a higher price for energy in the UK 10% higher, as it is colder in the North. To standardise energy prices in the UK. Scotland would pay 10% less the rest of the UK would pay 1% more. The energy Companies wanted to charge less for those nearer the source. Ie Scotland. Westminster refused permission.

    An Independent Scotland would be free to control or tax energy exports. There is no way Scotland would be short of (cheaper) energy.

    Reply
  11. Helen Cameron says:

    The D R also had another scare story by Sam galbraith about cross border medical treatment, despite Great Ormond Street,s press release of 30/95 reassuring us that care contracts with other countries already exist.But why let the truth get in the way of a sensational headline?

    Reply
  12. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “I thought it meant UK paid £550 million and Scots £250 million, totalling £800 million.”

    It’s so badly written it’s hard to tell. But that doesn’t make sense – in that case Scotland would lose out on £550m a year, not just £300m.

    Reply
  13. Kenneth Shaw says:

    Will there be a special fuel allowance …. I don’t have any children….

    Reply
  14. Helen Cameron says:

    Sorry, should be 30/05.

    Reply
  15. macart763m says:

    Wow misrepresentation and innumerate all in one article. The DR is going for the grand slam of comic editorial.

    Reply
  16. Gizzit says:

    I don’t think it would be prudent to set fire to our children – the Whitehall orthodoxy is that we would have to eat them instead.

    Reply
  17. James123 says:

    So its clear we need to stay in the UK where energy bills have gone down year on year…oh wait a minute.

    Reply
  18. Remind me where the Ruk get most of their electricity from and the water to generate it. I’m sure they will continue to use Scottish electricity for their cups of tea after Independence. Of course it may be dearer for them if they have a different currency and an imposed vitual or imaginary border patrol. They must think people in Scotland zip up the back and swallow anything thrown at them. Quite the contrary I expect many are more determined to vote Yes

    Reply
  19. uilleam_beag says:

    There’s no indication in the piece where this £3billion figure comes from at all, so far as I can see. It certainly isn’t from taking £250m from £500million, that’s for sure – those two figures need to be ADDED together to produce the £800million total UK subsidy, it makes no sense to deduct the Scottish amount from the rUK one.

    I’m totally at a loss to explain/understand what the Record are on about.

    Reply
  20. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “I don’t think it would be prudent to set fire to our children – the Whitehall orthodoxy is that we would have to eat them instead.”

    Yeah, but they’re not MONSTERS. They wouldn’t demand that we eat them RAW.

    Reply
  21. Kenneth Shaw says:

    At least their should be a big spike in adoption applications. Panic over I have seven dogs , they should keep me warm for a while .

    Reply
  22. Oneironaut says:

    @Gizzit
    “I don’t think it would be prudent to set fire to our children – the Whitehall orthodoxy is that we would have to eat them instead.”

    Well you could combine winter heating with a nice summery barbecue 😀 hehe.

    Reply
  23. Peter Mirtitsch says:

    Did the mistake arise because we pay more to feed in green energy to the grid..oh wait…

    Reply
  24. dmw42 says:

    I don’t suppose there’s any mention of the £36bn subsidy costs to all UK households for the new nuclear power plant?

    Reply
  25. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “those two figures need to be ADDED together to produce the £800million total UK subsidy”

    To make the numbers work on ANY level I think we have to assume that the £800m breaks down as:

    £250m Scotland
    £300m rest of UK
    £250m outside of UK

    (Presumably because most of our energy companies are foreign-owned.)

    Reply
  26. Proud Cybernat says:

    Do you think the average DR reader will notice?

    Reply
  27. I am Just Stunned by the barefaced hype and lies. I am concerned that more than just the elderly and blinkered Grannie Labour will believe it.

    I would – good rad socialist that I am – want our reps. to do something about the factual inaccuracies. Except they are the source.

    Off to staff a Yes Stall at Stoney Folk Festival.

    Reply
  28. uilleam_beag says:

    My point has already been made while I was typing, I see.

    Reply
  29. Grouse Beater says:

    Sturat: It’s so badly written it’s hard to tell.

    There’s an implicit assumption in your comment Alexander and his band are clever, intelligent people, ever vigilant of detail and accuracy, rather than the dullards they are happiest following templates instructions from party leaders.

    Reply
  30. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    For some eye watering estimates of decommissioning costs and runaway costing cast a butcher’s at this from Wiki re nuclear power plants.

    In 2005 the cost of decommissioning these sites was planned at £55.8 billion, with Sellafield requiring £31.5 billion.[4] However in 2006 the NDA reported that the cost of cleaning up existing waste was higher than previously thought, and gave a new estimated decommissioning cost of about £72 billion over a 100 year period.[5] In 2008 estimated decommissioning costs increased to £73.6 billion, or after taking account of discount rates £44.1 billion.[6] A 2006 estimate foresaw £14bn of offsetting income from reprocessing fuel at Sellafield.[5] In 2009 the NDA sold land near three existing reactor sites for expected new nuclear power stations, for over £200m.[7]

    In 2013 a critical Public Accounts Committee report stated that the private consortium managing Sellafield has failed to reduce costs and delays. Since 2005 the annual costs of operating Sellafield had increased from £900 million to about £1.6 billion. The estimated lifetime cost of dealing with the Sellafield site had increased to £67.5 billion.[8][9]

    In March 2012, the total undiscounted cost of decommissioning all sites was estimated at £100 billion.[10]

    I am sure an estimate made in 2014 would be a magnox degree of difference on the 2012 estimate.

    Reply
  31. Gordon Innes (Gin) says:

    Maybe this is just the DR idea of balance.

    After all how many of these stories are equal to printing the potential future NHS projection?

    But at least they are trying harder than Naughtie, Andrew Neil et al

    Reply
  32. Calum Craig says:

    “Locusts to plague an independent Scotland”.

    Reply
  33. Finlay Jolliffe says:

    “I thought it meant UK paid £550 million and Scots £250 million, totalling £800 million.”

    It’s so badly written it’s hard to tell. But that doesn’t make sense – in that case Scotland would lose out on all £550m a year, not just £300m.

    Agreed.

    The figure quoted also suggests a total for the Capital Investment, it doesn’t separate how much was direct investment from the Energy companies and how much was Government subsidy. Whole article is meaningless!

    Either way how much of a hike the Scottish consumer would see is pure speculation, the Energy companies will set a price for the energy and charge everybody, they received subsidy not the people of Scotland (Have I got that right?)

    Reply
  34. Rooster says:

    I can’t take seriously anything that mentions green energy subsidies in isolation. Nuclear and fossil energy are also subsidised in the UK. More-so than green according to some reports.

    Perhaps Scotland can save money by not subsidising fossil and nuclear energy even if it increases green subsidies.

    Reply
  35. Kenneth Shaw says:

    Reset to default once again. If a moderately positive poll (survation) provokes such panic in the M.S.M can you imagine what will prevail when the first 50+ Yes poll breaks. Slash and burn with a sprinkling of Agent Orange on the cards.

    Reply
  36. Lesley-Anne says:

    Gizzit says:

    I don’t think it would be prudent to set fire to our children – the Whitehall orthodoxy is that we would have to eat them instead.

    You obviously have not read the latest diktat from Westminster Gizzit. The proclamation says:

    “Let it be known that from the start of Scottish independence ALL children under the age of 18 shall be required to carry out chimney sweeping duties from the hours of 06:00 to 18:00 7 days a week. Children who carry out the requisite number of chimney sweeps each day, 48, will after 12 month’s be permitted to 1 day off. Children who fail to reach their daily target will be spit roasted and used to feed the locals!” 😉

    Note to any new reader here The above quote is of course not true, it is not 06:00 till 18:00 it is 04:00 till 24:00, 60 chimneys per day, 24 months and half a day off. 😛

    Reply
  37. uilleam_beag says:

    The whole article is just wonky. The £800m fig is described as investment in renewables and we’re then told how much (550m) came from rUK followed by the 250m fig from “Scottish consumers”. So are we talking about investment, income from consumer bills or government subsidies (direct or levvied from household bills)?

    You can’t even get to 3billion by adding up all the figures in the article, including the £280-bill increase on a per capita (rather than household) basis!

    Reply
  38. pete says:

    I work in the renewable energy, I have worked on wind mill offshore projects all over the place , but I can say that I have never worked on any in Scottish waters!! Most of the work I have worked on is of the coast of England and Wales ie the London array, and rill flats in Wales, they are spending a hell ofa lot of money down south on wind farms, that we are ccontributing to pay for, so why are the bitching about what we are now getting,??? The London array is one of the largest wind farms in the world!!!

    They are spending billions down south, ps I cant wait for independence, so we can get craking on with our own offshore wind farms, lets get the kids leaving school some training in renewable energy, and show the world what we can do..

    Reply
  39. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Just to let you know that Westminster is not the only idiots when it comes to nuclear energy.

    The Fukushima fuckup on building a nuclear plant within a short distance from a sub sea fault, and thus a Tsunami close certainty, is only matched by the Diablo (yes Devil) Canyon plant on the waterfront of San Luis Obispo, between LA and San Francisco, on not one but four faults. This was discovered after they had started to build the plant.

    Anyway, who would miss LA, San Francisco and San Jose?

    Reply
  40. deevo82 says:

    This is purely a story to terrify OAPs. £280 per year fuel hike would equal abject poverty to many of them. This is assuming that OAPs are stupid and only read headlines – which I am pretty confident they are not.

    Reply
  41. Grouse Beater says:

    Anyway, who would miss LA, San Francisco and San Jose?

    Me. (Sniff)

    Reply
  42. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Did you do your sniffing there?

    Reply
  43. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    There is actually a film script in there.

    A major earthquake hits the area and the nuclear plant doesn’t just fall over it falls into a big hole of magma.

    and the Morlocks come out and attack us all.

    Reply
  44. Drunken Hobo says:

    Once again the subtext appears to be that the UK Government is doing something out of the kindness of their heart, rather than for financial benefit.

    Reply
  45. Kenneth Shaw says:

    Sorry
    Guardian already run that one …

    Reply
  46. Mosstrooper says:

    My head hurts.

    According to the Register General Scotland there were 2.37 million households in Scotland in 2011. Multiplied by £280 equals 663.6 million.

    Where do all the other figures come from?

    Reply
  47. Les Wilson says:

    Our usual diet of totally obvious lies, even No’s must be shaking their heads in disbelief.
    If they say No, WE say YES! simples.

    Reply
  48. Les Wilson says:

    Drunken Hobo says:

    yes, therein is a good laugh. The do not do good things for Scotland, we need to be kept in our wee corner and thrown a few scraps now and then. The big problem is though, they even want them back!

    Reply
  49. a2 says:

    Cooking children obviously demands more energy which of course will result in another price hike, probably doubling up from £3b to £8b (Danny’s calculator).

    Reply
  50. a2 says:

    OT but I just suddenly thought, If we can get The SNP to advocate a No Vote, will the Labour machine suddenly flip to a yes just to oppose the SNP for the sake of it?

    Reply
  51. Calgacus MacAndrews says:

    @BTP

    I think the Morlocks threat is in the BT fearbomb plan for the first week of August.

    Reply
  52. desimond says:

    Recent Private Eye also had the scare story that Scotlands goal of 100% renewables would have us skint and in darkness.

    Its all just Charlie Brown and the BlahBlahBlah Teachers voice these days.

    As for Danny Alexander…theres 1 guy who will have nowhere to go in next few years..and well deserved too.

    Reply
  53. cynicalHighlander says:

    33 and falling.

    link to rsf.org

    Reply
  54. Mosstrooper says:

    Ah! 550 million divide by 2.37mil equals 232.

    at least that is close. So England (or rUK) will refuse to pay for renewable investment if the naughty Scots vote YES.

    One must then assume that they will not want any of our electricity. Hmmm! let’s see how that works out on a winters day.

    Reply
  55. Les Wilson says:

    It is about time someone compiled everything we have AND everything we pay for now. Our massive savings in not having to pay for things WE do not want nor need, must mount up to a big amount of money.

    Then there are the shared assets, add a ballpark figure to the totals. We need this done just to show where we really will be.ie much wealthier, we will be able to carry out our own projects and if Westminster does not want involved, we put our own cable across the North sea and sell our power to Europe, as an example.

    If in the energy case, Westminster wants our power after all, they will have to pay more. Same for water.

    Reply
  56. Backwardsforwards says:

    Badly written indeed. I think he left out ‘over the next 10 years ‘ bit.

    Reply
  57. velofello says:

    The rUK subsidy cost predicted as £93/MWhr: Scotland subsidy cost is £44/MWhr. Does appear to offer scope for an up to £49/MWhr profit margin for exported power to rUK.

    So with independence Scotland could export and reap profit from electricity. Presently we give it away – I don’t suppose there is a line item in the Great British P&L account evaluating Scotland’s electricity transfer to England, Wales and N Ireland?

    Reply
  58. seanair says:

    Can anyone tell me why Westminster is still pursuing nuclear reactors when the start up costs plus the decommissioning costs are so horrendous?
    Also why ………when Germany and Japan are giving up nuclear fuel?

    Reply
  59. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Calgacus MacAndrews

    Problem is that the NO team already look like Morlocks.

    So they are living amongst us.

    Scarey?

    Reply
  60. Helena Brown says:

    I wonder at the people who let their name be used in this way. Is it the Record which cannot count, or is it the Professor?

    Reply
  61. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    seanair

    They have no alternative and anyway, it is a good source of envelopes.

    Did you know that Gordon Brown’s brother was head of PR for EDF the French nuclear power generator?

    Gordon spent a few Summers in the Hamptons, Long Island in a house his brother rented.

    Reply
  62. Paul D says:

    The answer could be a wee bit more mundane; they may have just chopped out the bit where it was meant to say “over 10 years” so that it would fit neatly in the box.

    Granted in the context, those three words are rather important ones.

    Reply
  63. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    re my post to seanair

    I forgot Private Eye’s “allegedly,” your Honour.

    Reply
  64. Brotyboy says:

    I’d miss San Fran, but I never want to see the car park that is LA ever again.

    Reply
  65. Soda says:

    Gizzit says:
    12 July, 2014 at 11:23 am
    I don’t think it would be prudent to set fire to our children – the Whitehall orthodoxy is that we would have to eat them instead

    Ok, i’ll say it….. Or worse!

    Reply
  66. Fiona says:

    Wrote a longish post for this topic which will not send. If anyone is interested I have put it here

    link to thosebigwords.forumcommunity.net

    Reply
  67. Ken500 says:

    Hughes doesn’t like Renewables? £400 would need to be added to bills in the UK. 15/12/13 (Daily Mail)

    Reply
  68. cynicalHighlander says:

    Mind you ‘Kiddy burgers’ has a certain ring about it.

    Reply
  69. Helena Brown says:

    Hate to tell them but I have been watching the Cooncil upgrading the hooses here with better insulation. I would say there is going to be a fall in the amount of Electricity being used here in a independent Scotland. We dinnae have the same desire for aw those auld hooses that the English cleave tae either.
    Tell ye what, we will double the price tae them and use the money tae pit Photovoltaic cells on aw the roofs here, that little bit should help.

    Reply
  70. David Agnew says:

    There is no barrel they won’t scrape. No cesspit they won’t wallow in. No smear or insult they won’t use. But what always leaves be flabbergasted is the use of the “dependency” argument. I don’t consider myself British – I have always used it as a collective pronoun. But I would shrivel up from sheer embarrassment if my nation was so useless and relied so much on subsidy. What on earth would make you proud of that? The logic simply eludes me.

    Reply
  71. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    LA is about 7 suburbs and there is no traditional tidal flow in and out of real city centre.

    It is just a semi permanent gridlock

    Reply
  72. Auld Sandy says:

    The difference is down to what is known in financial circles as as FCP. (P for profit I’ll leave you to work out what the FC stands for)

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “The difference is down to what is known in financial circles as as FCP. (P for profit I’ll leave you to work out what the FC stands for)”

      I’m sorry, we don’t do riddles here. Either say, or sod off.

      Reply
  73. BigRik says:

    I saw a government minister during the week saying they could just as easily buy electricity abroad, he mentioned France and Belgium, So he thinks it will be cheaper and easier to run undersea cables across one of the busiest shipping channels in the world, than using the grid that already exists, and which we ALL paid for… it’s like being back in the playground. The NO camp all seem to think that the entire rest of the world would treat us as pariahs, just because they want to. And they think that makes them fit to govern? NO F$&*$%G THANKS

    Reply
  74. Vestas says:

    Our next-door neighbour here in Leicester works for Centrica and (amusingly since I come from there) spent several years on the Lewis windfarm/HVDC interconnector proposals. He also worked on various other projects mainly north of Inverness.

    He’s one of the “too wee, too poor, too stupid” mob but setting that to one side….

    The reality of the situation is that a lot of the consented windfarms north of Inverness have been on hold/going slow for a couple of reasons :

    1) The tories aren’t as keen on windfarms as nulab were, so there’s concern regarding the stability of any subsidy;

    2) There is concern regarding independence but that’s tied in with the cost of upgrading the transmission infrastructure.

    In other words there may be a lot of wind/tide up north but its bloody expensive to build the interconnectors (Crown Estate wanting their cut doesn’t help matters). Obviously companies are looking at the payback time on this & I can see why there’s some concern when you introduce independence/irrational unionists/etc.

    FWIW I reckon tidal power will make building the interconnectors pretty much a no-brainer. England has to get power from somewhere and tidal power is likely to be both cheap and reliable.

    Oh and is anyone surprised that the hacks on the Record can’t count/invent numbers to suit?

    Reply
  75. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    BigRik

    There is a cross Channel interconnector.

    I would hazard a guess it was installed using Barnett non consequentials as a UK asset.

    In fact power generators pay in to the National Grid so they can sell the electricity to the consumer.

    The charge is based on the distance from London so if your generator is very near London you receive a negative pay-in. That is to say a subsidy per KW Hour.

    Scotland with about 13% of generation capacity pays over half the cost of the National Grid.

    Another hidden London subsidy

    Reply
  76. cynicalHighlander says:

    For those interested 1pm Sat 12 July, “Stop Attacking Gaza! Gla.

    link to new.livestream.com

    Reply
  77. G H Graham says:

    It doesn’t actually matter if the numbers are accurate or are representative of reality pre or post independence.

    The objective by the media is to simply throw any manner & any number of apparently doom laden disasters at their readers.

    They know most people will never check the stories for accuracy & hope that in this instance that the majority will believe the message that their home energy bills will skyrocket after independence.

    The numbers are almost irrelevant just so long as they look so big that they appear to true & very scary.

    Anyone who still buys these papers or visits their websites really aught to think about the consequences of funding propaganda on behalf of the British Establishment. If you are fine with that, go ahead & keep buying them.

    Just be fully aware that you are indirectly supporting the Better Together/No Thanks/Vote No Borders/Westminster/Unionist cabal.

    Reply
  78. BigRik says:

    Thanks BtP, sorry, i just assumed they would commision a new one starting in London at the cost to us of about 60 billion or so, inevitably going way over budget. My pessimism and cynicism knows no bounds 🙂

    Reply
  79. galamcennalath says:

    I started googling and reading and calculating, trying to make some sense of all this in my head.

    Making sense, adding up – that’s not what it’s about.

    It’s about generating another negative scary headline. It doesn’t need to add up, nor make sense. Most importantly, it doesn’t even need to be close to the truth. It’s just the latest installment of lies and deceit!

    The more all this goes on, the more it’s not about countering each and every little lie, it’s about getting the message across to as many DKs/soft-NOs as possible that they lie, trust none of it!

    Reply
  80. BigRik says:

    The problem with the NO camp seems to be, they are living in the past, forgetting that most of us have almost limitless facts and figures in our pockets.Five minutes on Google is all you need, yet it still seems to be beyond our esteemed journo’s. I tell no’s and dont knows to check for themselves, just avoid .gov sites.

    Reply
  81. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    BigRik says:

    The key is that post Independence the transmission costs are going to have to be borne by the consumers and principally London.

    So, stand by for an onslaught from the Daily Heil about usurious Scots.

    Reply
  82. Derek M says:

    ah the other big whopper of a lie renewable energy is expensive and will cost Scotland billions and will leave us all in the dark in an independent Scotland ,well it is kind of true but only if you replace Scotland with England.

    BtP is spot on we subsidize England`s greed for energy consumption,that is why they are pushing through insane measures like fracking and are going to build more nuclear power stations but even these measures will not stop the grid hitting shortages of energy supply in 5 years time at the rate of consumption just now.
    Scotland will be fine in fact without having to subsidize England our energy bills will reduce and if they dont then we must take the whole sector back into public hands and chuck out the greedy monopoly that has been allowed to form under westminster mismanagement.

    Reply
  83. Derek M says:

    oh i should state why i used England and not the rUK the reason is because Wales and NI are also subsidizing England.

    Reply
  84. nycgype says:

    £3B ÷ £280 is 10.7 million Scottish households.

    Reply
  85. muttley79 says:

    No lie is big enough for the MSM in Scotland. Out and out propaganda, and absolutely no shame in the lies told to prevent Scottish self determination either.

    Reply
  86. Richard Taylor says:

    Since Scotland’s (and by inference the UK’s) oil and gas is apparently fast running out according to UK government sources, what will the UK do for electricity generation and household & industrial gas supplies in 10 years’ time?

    Nice to see the Scottish Government has been looking at alternative means of power generation using Scotland’s natural resources of wind and waves and our hydroelectric facilities…

    Maybe instead of ‘green energy’ we could call it ’emergency when the oil runs out wtf are you going to do energy’?

    Reply
  87. Defo says:

    Stable Electricity generation is just another negotiating card we have to play post indy. To keep output at 50 kHz when demand increases, you need to be able to draw on a source of generation which can be brought on line quickly. i.e. Hydro. And where’s all the Hydro ?

    Reply
  88. handclapping says:

    Im surprised Ms Baillie isn’t in this somewhere. In the first bidding for the number of jobs depending on Trident at Faslane one of her more enthusiastic supporters was going for her to adopt 16% of all jobs in West Scotland. That is about 660,000 people, say 50% working age and 16% or 53,000. Its such a shame that the MoD say 520 and Ms Baillie only claims 11,000 now.

    Still when shipbuilding jobs have gone from 33,000 to 6,000 and are still heading down, even if we get the new destroyers, under the Union, its supporters need something with big scary numbers in it to divert attention from the problem of us not being Better Together.

    Reply
  89. Muscleguy says:

    @Ken500

    Excellent points well made.

    Aside from anything else Westminster is just jealous we have both excellent renewable energy resources in amounts England can only dream about and a government that is more than happy to drive the utility of them.

    This is why we have more renewable energy than England, a dividend of the powers in Devolution. As you say though there are things we can do post Independence to both reduce bills for Scots and increase further our renewable output.

    The investment in the ability to store energy in hydro lakes and so soak up renewables when for eg the wind blows on warm sunny days is good. We not only have more hydro power systems to use we have both a government keen to facilitate such investment and companies keen to invest in them, contrary to the scaremongering of BT and Westminster.

    Reply
  90. jon esquierdo says:

    Remember the man who wrote this article had a serious head injury when he fell in Lewis

    Reply
  91. Roll_On_2014 says:

    Bugger (the Panda): at 1.07 pm

    Scotland with about 13% of generation capacity pays over half the cost of the National Grid.

    Not often that I read the Hootsmon Business section because I can never get past the comedy section. But I did recently and picked this up. What is your take on it?

    Undersea cable could bring cheaper energy

    The 100-mile line (cable), between Caithness and Moray, will be installed by SSE subsidiary Scottish Hydro Electric over the next four years. Experts said it could unleash more than 1.2GW of renewable energy projects.

    Until now, it has been difficult for energy firms to plan projects in the far north because of the lack of connections to the main grid. Firms supplying energy far from population centres are penalised due to the costs of transmitting the energy. In contrast, some in England are paid for doing so. Ofgem also announced grid charges for green electricity generators in Scotland will be reduced from April 2016.

    This will cut costs for companies planning projects north of the Border and generate savings which could ultimately be passed down to consumers.

    Reply
  92. jon esquierdo says:

    Bugger The Panda

    Why do you think that Gordon the tax cheat Brown (Lord Tebitts accusation not mine) signed the contract with EDF to build the new Hinkley Point nuclear station ?

    Reply
  93. G. P. Walrus says:

    Can’t we burn Daily Records instead of our children?

    Reply
  94. Robert Peffers says:

    @Dennis the menace says: 12 July, 2014 at 11:24 am

    “They must think people in Scotland zip up the back and swallow anything thrown at them”.

    Well, Dennis, that’s nearly right. Remember it is the Daily Record we are discussing here. Thus it is not, “The People of Scotland”, the Daily Record aims its idiotic Better Together propaganda lies at.

    It’s obviously aimed at that rapidly declining, totally ignorant, band of total numpties who are still stupid enough to actually buy a copy of the Daily Record.

    In other words the Better Togeter official campaign knows their only hope of avoiding an independent Scotland is to hang onto enough already ignorant dunderheids to avoid the drop.

    It’s amazing just how many new converts to the YES side I’ve come across in just the last month alone. Had a person come up to me this very morning and ask, “Are you the SNP”? After informing him I was not the SNP but only a single member of the Party he continued, “Aye! That’s whit Ah meant – Wha’s goan tae pey ma pension efter Independence?

    He didn’t really believe my answer but said he would ask his own brother who lived in Australia. I wonder why he didn’t do that before asking a stranger? Perhaps he was trying to catch me out. I’ll ask him if I see him again.

    Reply
  95. Murray McCallum says:

    Isn’t there the danger we do not aggressively exploit renewable energies enough in the next 10-20 years before all the wind and tides run out?

    I’m just trying to “think” from the same place this Daily Record story was coming from.

    Reply
  96. Auld Sandy says:

    “The difference is down to what is known in financial circles as FCP. (P for profit I’ll leave you to work out what the FC stands for)”

    “I’m sorry, we don’t do riddles here. Either say, or sod off.”

    You missed out the point about investment (already paid for by the taxpayer) being considerably less than the increased bills (paid for by the consumer, who is probably also the taxpayer who already paid for the investment). This article implies that, after independence, the FCs (Fat Cats or Fine Chaps or Foreign Companies – take your pick or add your own) who treat UK consumers SO benevolently won’t be half as kind to the residents of Scotland.

    Reply
  97. Conan_the_Librarian says:

    @Bugger

    The Morlocks are out marching as we speak…

    Reply
  98. Robert Peffers says:

    Here are some actual figures for one year and cites for where the figures came from: –

    Gas, oil and coal prices got subsidised by £3.63bn in 2010, (Data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    Offshore and onshore wind got just £0.7bn in the year from April 2010. All renewables, (including wind), in the UK got just £1.4bn over the same period. (Data from the Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc).

    Just before announcing the new renewables subsidies the government cut subsidy for on shore turbines by 10%.

    Nuclear power gets subsidised, some well hidden, more than all others put together.

    The current charging regime means that, for example, an energy provider in Peterhead, Aberdeenshire would have to pay £20 per kw for a grid connection while London-based energy provider would be subsidised by £3 per kw. It is estimated that Scottish based companies currently pay £100 million more than they should as a result.

    Remember another important fact – Renewable energy, “fuel”, is not only free but it fetches itself to the site. It has no waste matter to dispose of either. Nor does it have to be bought again every time the imported fossil fuel runs done.

    Reply
  99. Thepnr says:

    @Robert Peffers

    It’s obviously aimed at that rapidly declining, totally ignorant, band of total numpties who are still stupid enough to actually buy a copy of the Daily Record.

    In other words the Better Togeter official campaign knows their only hope of avoiding an independent Scotland is to hang onto enough already ignorant dunderheids to avoid the drop.

    Robert, I realise you are a passionate SNP supporter, but the SNP alone are not going to win this referendum for Scotland.

    Lay off with the “numpties” and “ignorant dunderheids”. This is NOT the way to win potential voters over to the Yes side.

    Reply
    • donald anderson says:

      Aye stoap sayin’ that aboot the ignorant numpties. Ignorance is bliss.

      Reply
  100. Jim says:

    Please correct me if I am wrong, arithmetic isn’t a strong point but they are saying that, the extra £3billion equates to £280 per household which means there are just about 11 Million houses in Scotland?
    Sorry, my brain is hurting again!

    Reply
  101. Gary says:

    First, he’s NOT an ‘Energy Expert’ he’s an economist, which in this instance means he has no special knowledge to offer. The money spent was CAPITAL spending, not a maintenance cost. Remember renewables, once put in place, produce ‘free’ energy, ie no further spending on fuels like coal, gas etc. So, if you take a capital spend, divide it by the number of household and recoup it over one year it WOULD cost this much. Fortunately for us, this isn’t how the renewables sector works, if he really WAS an energy expert he’d know this.

    Reply
  102. Chris says:

    Just checked the link to this guys other work posted by the Rev and the headline should read that we would save £120 a year compared to remaining in the UK.
    He says that to meet the targets the price rise in the UK would be by £400 for every energy bill; so they obviously just didn’t let him finish his sentence.

    link to research.ed.ac.uk

    Reply
  103. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Conan

    There are many chapters and sub species out and under there.

    Reply
  104. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Auld Sandy

    I am quivverin in ma bits.

    Not as BENEVOLENT to Scotland as they are to the UK?

    Oh dear.

    Electricity is cheaper just about everywhere on the Continent as it is in the UK.

    Read what I said about electricity being subsidised in London.

    Benevolent?

    Reply
  105. Jim says:

    Most people wont do the maths and believe that rubbish and even if someone pointed out their deliberate error they would print a tiny retraction hidden away somewhere in the paper somewhere.

    Reply
  106. the solution is simple , stop buying the newspapers who are biased towards us
    get your news via twitter which can be as situations happen , not the next day
    if at all

    Reply
  107. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Roll_On_2014

    I somehow doubt that saving will ever be passed on, not by a for profit entity.

    Reply
  108. gerry parker says:

    Donald.
    “I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately, in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square.”

    Lady Bracknell – The importance of being Ernest

    Reply
    • donald anderson says:

      Irony is loast oan the thick.
      Donald Anderson.

      Reply
  109. Derek says:

    Danny Alexander was on Moneybox on Radio 4 earlier on – it was starting just as I was going out so I didn’t hear it – it was all going to be to do with the financial disentangling that would follow a yes vote.

    Reply
  110. Auld Sandy says:

    Bugger (the Panda) says:

    “Auld Sandy
    I am quivverin in ma bits.
    Not as BENEVOLENT to Scotland as they are to the UK?
    Oh dear.”

    I apologise unreservedly for my poor effort at irony.

    My serious hope is that the Government of an independent Scotland wouldn’t be in cahoots with these people.

    Reply
    • donald anderson says:

      Aye. They’re too good tae us.

      Reply
  111. Robert Peffers says:

    Les Wilson says: 12 July, 2014 at 12:17 pm

    ”It is about time someone compiled everything we have AND everything we pay for now.”

    Where the hell have you been?

    Way back in around 2005 a Scottish Forensic Accountant named Niall Aslen Produced a Report he titled, “The Big Lie”. For this he suffered great threats including a visit from MI5 that saw several operatives turn his office upside down convinced that he had inside information to secret government papers.

    In fact the figures he used were all from already public domain UK Government papers. Since then Niall’s paper has been redone as, “The Great Obfuscation”. Here is a link to that paper : –

    link to oilofscotland.org

    Have a read, a good bit of research, and expect to have a real eye opener.

    Reply
  112. Robert Peffers says:

    velofello says: 12 July, 2014 at 12:24 pm
    “So with independence Scotland could export and reap profit from electricity. Presently we give it away – I don’t suppose there is a line item in the Great British P&L account evaluating Scotland’s electricity transfer to England, Wales and N Ireland?”

    No, velofello, but there is this : –

    “Gas, oil and coal prices got subsidised by £3.63bn in 2010, (Data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    Offshore and onshore wind got just £0.7bn in the year from April 2010. All renewables, (including wind), in the UK got just £1.4bn over the same period. (Data from the Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc).

    Just before announcing the new renewables subsidies the government cut subsidy for on shore turbines by 10%.

    Nuclear power gets subsidised, some well hidden, more than all others put together.

    The current charging regime means that, for example, an energy provider in Peterhead, Aberdeenshire would have to pay £20 per kw for a grid connection while London-based energy provider would be subsidised by £3 per kw. It is estimated that Scottish based companies currently pay £100 million more than they should as a result.”.

    Reply
  113. Robert Peffers says:

    Bugger (the Panda) says: 12 July, 2014 at 12:26 pm

    “Problem is that the NO team already look like Morlocks. So they are living amongst us. Scarey?”

    Jings! Thats’s a right load o old Morlocks!

    Reply
  114. Jim says:

    It’s all Tam Cowan’s fault:

    “He is a strong, though fortunately not compelling, reason for believing that Scotland does not deserve independence; that it is not ready to cope with the responsibilities of statehood, a grown-up world beyond football and blue jokes. Marginalised in the sports pages of the Daily Record, preaching to the converted, he does a limited amount of damage.”

    link to scottishreview.net

    There you have it.

    Reply
  115. Robert Peffers says:

    Soda says: 12 July, 2014 at 12:37 pm

    “I don’t think it would be prudent to set fire to our children – the Whitehall orthodoxy is that we would have to eat them instead”

    Dear Sir, As one whoes children were burned by the state, I take great exception to the whole concept of burning my Children. I insist it is far far better to eat them and cure any surplus as reserves against lean times,
    Aefauldlie,
    Yours aye,
    Sawney Bean.

    Reply
  116. Jim says:

    Damn, children get a hard time, people wanting to burn them, eat them. Pedophiles and pederasts.

    Reply
  117. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Sorry Auld Sandy

    Maybe I need an irony transplant!

    ????????

    Reply
  118. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Sandy the ?????? were supposed to be like wee smiley faces

    🙂

    Reply
  119. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    like that

    Reply
  120. goldenayr says:

    Has everyone been on a Saturday afternoon sesh apart frae me?

    Reply
  121. Robert Peffers says:

    BigRik says: 12 July, 2014 at 12:58 pm
    “I saw a government minister during the week saying they could just as easily buy electricity abroad, he mentioned France and Belgium”.

    Here’s a wee bit of real history for you.

    The end of WWII the greatest expansion of the UK Electricity Grid with the beginning of the new Supergrid. This was mainly due to the, “Big Freeze of 1945/46 and the Worlds first cross-border grid line fed electricity from the Edinburgh area into Englands existing grid.

    Scotland that day began to export electricity into England – and it has done so every single day since.

    Now consider this – “The current Grid Charging regime means that, for example, an energy provider in Peterhead, Aberdeenshire must pay £20 per kw for a grid connection while London-based energy provider would be subsidised by £3 per kw. It is estimated that Scottish based companies currently pay £100 million more than they should as a result.

    Reply
  122. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    goldenayr

    The sesh ma faither wore?

    Reply
  123. goldenayr says:

    BtP

    🙂

    Too late,I’ve joined ye…ya bass.

    Gutrot has a lot to answer too.(?)

    Reply
  124. gerry parker says:

    @ Bugger,

    or as was noted when 2 orangemen were caught “skinning up” in a close.

    The hash my father scored.

    🙂

    Reply
  125. Robert Peffers says:

    Bugger (the Panda) says: 12 July, 2014 at 7:19 pm

    “The sesh ma faither wore?”

    Mair lik, “The Sesh Mia Farrow wore”.

    Reply
  126. Brian Mchugh says:

    Do the Daily record have any members of staff with an Arithmetic Ordinary or Standard Grade?

    It clearly appears that they don’t.

    Here is a bit of Arithmetic for them…

    Media Lies + Intelligent Scots = End of Daily Record

    Reply
  127. Jim says:

    Doug, sorry, Jackie baillie reckons it will be £875 per household:
    link to dailyrecord.co.uk

    Reply
  128. Jim says:

    Doug, sorry, Jackie Bailie says we face a rise of £875 per household:
    link to dailyrecord.co.uk

    Reply
  129. Jim says:

    Sorry for the double post.

    Reply
  130. Peter says:

    We could render jackboot baillie and supply enough oil to keep us warm until the heat death of the Universe.

    Interesting just how many unionists also hate renewable energy. Which is odd as they can’t stop going on about how oil is about to run out. You would think that they would be all for sustainable development.

    On the subject of Hydro. Why are all of the public water supply reservoirs not also producing Hydro-electricity? Apart from the Loch Turret scheme all of that potential is just wasted.

    Reply
  131. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Jim Peffers, Goldenayr and Gerry

    Amateur Night tonight? 😉

    Pubs closed early?

    Goldenayr—you have the skeets?

    There is a lot of it around, viral not bacterial.

    Reply
  132. goldenayr says:

    BtP

    My natural condition on comment sites that are world wide.

    😀

    Also why have shares in Huggies and Pampers.

    Reply
  133. lochside says:

    @Robert , is Niall Aslan still alive? His work ‘The Great Obfuscation’ should be sent out to every household in Scotland before September.

    Even the densest naysayer would grasp the extent of Westminster deceitful theft of our wealth by reading this.

    Reply
  134. alistair says:

    O/T
    Paolo sounding good at T in park on just now. Obviously a few more yessers visible tonight that the Beeb can’t ignore. Also, spotted great Yes Highland sticker on a car in Aviemore today. Haven’t seen that before.

    Reply
  135. Sheena W says:

    It’s endemic and they can’t help themselves. Even Private Eye is getting in on the act. Their edition of a fortnight ago had a piece by ‘Old McSparky’ panning ‘Alex Salmond’s Renewables. A footnote at the bottom of the Old Sparky column in the current edition admits that where they had £4billion annual subsidy they actually should have said £0.4 billion annual subsidy. Of course, they said nothing about this error completely knocking their thesis to hell!

    Reply
  136. Grouse Beater says:

    Peffers: It’s obviously aimed at that rapidly declining, totally ignorant, band of total numpties who are still stupid enough to actually buy a copy of the Daily Record.

    Well now, how to handle that one?

    We have to be careful about lumping everybody into one toilet bowl judged by their reading matter. Not all Daily Record glancers, (no one ‘reads’ that rag, you glance at it) are anti-self determination.

    The chief chippy and his young son on one of my projects are voting Yes. The comic capers Record is their lunchtime relaxation, thereafter tossed in the bin. Now and then their chores are peppered with ridicule over yesterday’s idiotic utterances from ‘stupid’ Unionists.

    Reply
  137. Robert Peffers, at 7.47pm last night quoted:

    “The Sesh Mia Farrow wore”.

    Johnny Beattie – Ayr Gaiety Whirl 1969, if my memory serves me correctly.

    Reply
    • donald anderson says:

      The Moustache my father swore.

      Reply
  138. Oh! and I forgot –

    “Daily Record readers”, like “Sun readers” is an oxymoron.

    Reply
  139. Ken500 says:

    Scotland which is surplus in fuel and energy exports 25% but as part of the UK pays 10% more than the rest of the UK because it is colder. Not equal or fair.

    The UK buys in Norwegian gas. Is that subsidising the Norwegian economy? Germany buys Russian Gas. Is that subsidising the Russian economy?

    Reply
  140. Ken500 says:

    YES flags are coming out.

    Reply
  141. alistair says:

    Does anyone know who is behind “proudtobescots”. They have large banner on A9 going south near Aviemore beside a big estate house saying proud to bevscots, delighted to be united. Hopefully some of you know some residents up there where we can get some yes flags displayed

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,726 Posts, 1,215,030 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • diabloandco on The Gender Of Mountains: “Could someone tell me what exactly we import from the USA other than Ford and Harley Davidsons? I need to…Apr 4, 09:12
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Seems that neither Sven nor Bob have anything sensible to say about the war in the east. No change there…Apr 3, 19:26
    • Robert Hughes on The Gender Of Mountains: “Of course Swinney would bend over to * accommodate * the utterly farcical ” Red Menace ” bollocks ; another…Apr 3, 16:25
    • Sven on The Gender Of Mountains: “Vivian O’Blivion @ 14.15. A senior source close to the First Minister has a brass neck to dare to even…Apr 3, 16:12
    • Aidan on The Long Future: “@Xaracen – there is no such thing as a binary state, states can either be unitary (like the U.K.) or…Apr 3, 15:02
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““there’ll be Ruskie tanks parked in front of Hollyrood if we’re no careful” That, my dear Vivian O’Blivion, is an…Apr 3, 14:59
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: ““gutless pro Trump Brit Yoon NAZI appeaser” Iain treats us to another lesson on “hearts and minds”. Just in case…Apr 3, 14:47
    • Young Lochinvar on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Khmer Vert should just pull the trigger of the metaphorical gun they are holding to their own “electability” heads…Apr 3, 14:20
    • Vivian O’Blivion on The Gender Of Mountains: “The Scotland Editor of The New Statesman, Chris Deerin is full of praise for Mayor Swinney of Brigadoom. “The SNP…Apr 3, 14:15
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Yes – the ICCPR is an international obligation, however. For more information about the strength of the petition see Leah…Apr 3, 14:12
    • Dunx on The Gender Of Mountains: “The HRC And the ICCPR are different things.Apr 3, 12:54
    • MaryB on The Gender Of Mountains: “Thanks for that, Sarah.Apr 3, 12:16
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “As for the “principle of respect for the territorial integrity of states”, that can only apply to unitary states. For…Apr 3, 11:48
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “Scotland Act 1998 clause 7 (2) Sub-paragraph (1) does NOT reserve – (a) observing and implementing international obligations, obligations under…Apr 3, 11:30
    • Xaracen on The Long Future: “Ah, so it’s not an important matter of principle at all, then. It’s just a shoddy excuse to keep certain…Apr 3, 11:28
    • Mark Beggan on The Gender Of Mountains: ““A gutless pro Trump British yoon Nazi appeaser” as opposed to an aborted pro Faggot inbred Lefty jizz stain.Apr 3, 10:24
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “@Mary – you’re right, but the UNCRC was successfully challenged in the Supreme Court on the basis that it extended…Apr 3, 10:04
    • Sven on The Gender Of Mountains: “Iain More @ 08.15. I suspect that this will be in retaliation for the 82% Tariff which the Islands impose…Apr 3, 09:49
    • Southernbystander on The Gender Of Mountains: “Is there not a serious problem of throwing the baby out with the bath water with this endless invocation of…Apr 3, 09:44
    • MaryB on The Gender Of Mountains: “Aidan @ 6.23am Why don’t you Google UN Human Rights and ICCPR? The UK adopted the overall Human Rights Act,…Apr 3, 09:36
    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “Ok we get that you are a gutless pro Trump Brit Yoon NAZI appeaser. Thanks for letting is know.Apr 3, 09:22
    • Hatey McHateface on The Gender Of Mountains: “Why is this a gift for Scottish Indy, Iain? Is iScotland going to stand up to President Trump and the…Apr 3, 08:48
    • Iain More on The Gender Of Mountains: “41% Tariffs on Falkland Islands. What did they do to piss off Fuhrer Trump? I had no idea that the…Apr 3, 08:15
    • Aidan on The Gender Of Mountains: “Another cunning plan based on a whole heap of made up legal arguments which no court, anywhere, is going to…Apr 3, 06:23
    • Hatey McHateface on The Sacrifice: “@Zimba Regarding moral inconsistencies. I believe a meaningful debate between fair-minded individuals acting in good faith first needs some kind…Apr 2, 21:17
    • sarah on The Gender Of Mountains: “IMPORTANT: Leah Gunn Barrett attended the Public Petitions Committee at Holyrood today in order to see what would happen to…Apr 2, 19:40
    • agent x on The Gender Of Mountains: “Caroline Lucas says: “He helped transform the fortunes of the Scottish Green party – taking the party into government for…Apr 2, 18:13
    • Porty on The Long Future: “Have a wee look at her post and highlights of committee meeting today at Holyrood today, she’s a fighter, well…Apr 2, 18:08
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:04
    • Porty on The Long Future: “So the game’s a bogey, so we call it a day?Apr 2, 18:00
  • A tall tale



↑ Top