The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Revenge of the radio star

Posted on March 25, 2013 by

Something’s puzzled me for more than 15 years, viewers, and an article I read today brought it back to mind, so I’m going to raise it very briefly in the hopes that someone might even now be able to answer the question for me.

There’s something odd about the chart above, isn’t there?

Apple makes dizzyingly vast amounts of money selling software, music and iOS apps, yet there’s only a teeny tiny little broken yellow slice of that graph accounted for by videos. But hang on – don’t we live in the age of video? Aren’t we all walking around with amazing high-definition screens right in our pockets? So why aren’t people selling us reasons to look at them?

Pop videos are one of the iconic cornerstones of modern culture. Record companies spend vast amounts of money on making promos for singles, but then – incredibly – don’t offer people a way of watching them on demand.

The App Store doesn’t even have a pop videos section. A couple of half-hearted streaming services offer a pitiful selection from a tiny handful of bands. I’ve never seen any sort of multi-artist Now That’s What I Call Music Videos compilation, and very few artists ever release their own collection, certainly not while the band’s still active.

Much the same goes for YouTube, which would initially seem the obvious answer. Only a microscopic percentage of videos are made available through official channels, and much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising “wraps”.

The rest of the time, the industry actively tries to HIDE its work from consumers, often pursuing reflexive or automated takedown orders if its audience tries to do its promotional work for it.

If you’re lucky you’ll be able to find a logo-strewn version ripped off a TV channel that isn’t at TOO crappy a low resolution, but even then you’re reliant on an internet connection or mobile signal if you want to actually watch it.

If it’s not one of the many videos which are watchable on PC but blocked from running on mobile formats, that is. Funnily enough, the official version of the song in the above example only just reappeared in public view on the artist’s own channel – just two weeks ago when I was searching for it, it was invisible. But even now I can’t play either the official or unofficial versions on my iPhone.

(And that’s without even going into what an increasingly-painful chore it is to use YouTube at all these days. If there’s a way I can access or link to anything in my list of Favourites now without triggering the spewing-out of the entire thing in sequence as a “playlist”, I’m buggered if I can work out what it is. And adding insult to injury, the list is full of “Deleted Video” entries with no way of knowing what they used to be so I can try to find another version.)

Why are pop videos the most tightly-restricted cultural commodity in the world? Why can’t fans of an artist buy their videos as easily as they can buy their songs? Why do record companies spend millions of dollars and huge amounts of creative energy making often-brilliant PROMOTIONAL devices which they then go out of their way to STOP anyone from seeing – let alone giving them money for – other than by watching endless hours of music TV in the vague, remote hope that a truncated, censored, ad-mangled version might just come up?

Seriously, anyone. It’s been 15 years and I’m none the wiser. What the fuck?

0 to “Revenge of the radio star”

  1. James says:

    That Wikipedia list of the most expensive pop videos is amazing. Of the ten most expensive, I can remember the gist of three of them. Four of the songs I couldn't even hum. And all it cost them (and by them, it basically means "Sony") for those ten videos was a total of $37 million. Yes, most of them are around 20 years old, but that was around the peak of my MTV watching days.

    Reply
  2. Blucey says:

    Oh God… that fucking Two Cousins video…. I watched that for DAYS.

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Ditto.

    Reply
  4. kwyjibo says:

    I don't think the chart is that odd.  People associate video with Netflix and Youtube, not iTunes or the App Store.
    I do think that monetizing music videos is difficult – most people listen to music when they're doing something else.  I've got a front facing camera on my mobile, but you won't catch me doing a video call.

    Reply
  5. RFox says:

    Ask Duran Duran…..

    Reply
  6. Rusty Shackleford says:

    " much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising "wraps"
    You probably already know this, but it bears repeating for those who don't:
    Adblock+
    Ghostery
    Fit these extensions to Firefox or Chrome and never see another YT ad again, and no, not even a video ad.
    If you use IE, well, I can't help you.

    Reply
  7. Da5e says:

    Gods, I love that Andrew WK record. You know he appeared on a Current 93 song? Guitar Wolf, too. The guy might be a genius.

    Reply
  8. Daniel Walters says:

    As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁 “

      What can I tell you? Gamers are absolutely determined not to pay for journalism, a boy’s got to eat, and there are only so many hours in the day.

      Reply
  9. joncfc says:

    SAY SUMMAT STU!

    Reply
  10. We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You've worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.  True, I wouldn't want you to skip meals or lose sleep, but I'm still always interested in what you've got to say.  Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to my own overdue blogs as well (whistles)…

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You’ve worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.”

      I’m happy just watching.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,989 Posts, 1,252,662 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Willie on The fight about to come: “Small diversion on a Saturday evening. Now we know budgets are tight and we know that transport for some children…” Oct 16, 22:44
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “« The Nazis were only too anxious to secure the lustre of Thomas Mann’s presence and the prestige that mere…” Oct 16, 21:00
    • sam on The fight about to come: “I should have added that GERS is produced independently of Scottish ministers.” Oct 16, 19:37
    • sam on The fight about to come: “Who knows Mr Swinney’s feelings? Margaret Cuthbert was on the panel responding to that Committee inquiry into GERS. Here is…” Oct 16, 19:33
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “What glass house pray am i supposed to inhabit? A purely rhetorical matter forsooth. & All depends on the provenance…” Oct 16, 19:00
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “Indeed you are quite confused, confused. Jesus was a Jew, orthodox by today’s standards. Perhaps you are a Marcionist and…” Oct 16, 18:49
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Wasn’t he that bloke who was considerably to the left of Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell?” Oct 16, 18:38
    • factchecker on The fight about to come: “A good question, Sarah. Possibly one factor is because John Swinney remembers this Holyrood committee meeting where he was sitting…” Oct 16, 18:06
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Ah! But of course, wilfully blind, crass hypocrisy comes as standard with these permanently affronted “types”. Expecting moral consistency is…” Oct 16, 17:56
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “I bet you’ve suspected for years that yer Dad’s nae yer real Dad. False flags, eh?” Oct 16, 17:44
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““you do seem a cohort of embittered personages eyes reddened by a surfeit of prejudice” Seriously? Yet you have nothing…” Oct 16, 17:41
    • Lorncal on The fight about to come: “Indeed, Northcode, I agree with you on your use of anomaly as it applied to Mr Salmond, the person, not…” Oct 16, 17:22
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “Happily the SSRG Conference is on youtube so we can listen to some very sensible, intelligent, informed people speaking. The…” Oct 16, 17:18
    • J Robertson on The fight about to come: “Really ? what could possibly go wrong ?” Oct 16, 16:48
    • Captain Caveman on The fight about to come: “Meh. Well, your garden’s looking a tad shite from where I’m standing TURABDIN. Glass houses and all that. 😀” Oct 16, 16:25
    • TURABDIN on The fight about to come: “@Capt Caveman, Hatey, Northcode, On the basis of observation you do seem a cohort of embittered personages eyes reddened by…” Oct 16, 14:43
    • Confused on The fight about to come: “describing zionism as “racism” is pretty mild – I mean if you “really want to go there” tribalists, being tribal,…” Oct 16, 13:14
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “An interesting article about the crisis tearing the English Greens apart: https://unherd.com/newsroom/greens-zionism-row-could-tear-the-party-in-two/ The author essentially claims that it’s the Corbynist…” Oct 16, 12:44
    • Hatey McHateface on Still Time To Save Her: “Easy for you to say, SBS, but then you’re forgetting just how much grift and lucre there is to be…” Oct 16, 12:24
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the map of this island looks rather different come 2100” There’s defo gonna…” Oct 16, 12:10
    • Minceheid on The fight about to come: “Hatey McHateface says: 15 October, 2026 at 6:47 pm Dinna fash, MH, I’m in no position to draw my lines…” Oct 16, 11:42
    • Dick Wall on The fight about to come: “A stopped clock is right twice a day. The continued shambles that is the UK today could build support for…” Oct 16, 11:32
    • Southernbystander on Still Time To Save Her: “Everything from the past effects the present but people pick and choose what matters. How many on here would agree…” Oct 16, 11:22
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Aww, “Hatey’s Middle East friends”. I wonder who they might be. Surely not the people who have done more for…” Oct 16, 08:27
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““protofascist” I believe that to be a new word on Wings BTL. I’m certain it’s just another of those words…” Oct 16, 08:11
    • Luigi on The fight about to come: “Sigh. Do these so-called independence “leaders” not realise that their promises, their BS, their lack of action, lack of ambition,…” Oct 16, 08:03
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: ““Allowing rUK a reasonable time to relocate them might bring some rent to offset debt” Of course it will, sam.…” Oct 16, 08:00
    • Fearghas MacFhionnlaigh on The fight about to come: “SALVO digital newsletter: ‘Territorial Alienation’ https://indd.adobe.com/view/713e7419-f745-461a-b79e-a061397e7638” Oct 15, 23:31
    • Northcode on The fight about to come: “I’m with the Captain on this one – Turabdin’s (I don’t do all-caps words or names unless I’m shouting at…” Oct 15, 23:07
    • Northcode on The fight about to come: “anomaly (noun) something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected. I’d say the intelligent, well-read, erudite, honest and…” Oct 15, 22:50
  • A tall tale



↑ Top