The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Revenge of the radio star

Posted on March 25, 2013 by

Something’s puzzled me for more than 15 years, viewers, and an article I read today brought it back to mind, so I’m going to raise it very briefly in the hopes that someone might even now be able to answer the question for me.

There’s something odd about the chart above, isn’t there?

Apple makes dizzyingly vast amounts of money selling software, music and iOS apps, yet there’s only a teeny tiny little broken yellow slice of that graph accounted for by videos. But hang on – don’t we live in the age of video? Aren’t we all walking around with amazing high-definition screens right in our pockets? So why aren’t people selling us reasons to look at them?

Pop videos are one of the iconic cornerstones of modern culture. Record companies spend vast amounts of money on making promos for singles, but then – incredibly – don’t offer people a way of watching them on demand.

The App Store doesn’t even have a pop videos section. A couple of half-hearted streaming services offer a pitiful selection from a tiny handful of bands. I’ve never seen any sort of multi-artist Now That’s What I Call Music Videos compilation, and very few artists ever release their own collection, certainly not while the band’s still active.

Much the same goes for YouTube, which would initially seem the obvious answer. Only a microscopic percentage of videos are made available through official channels, and much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising “wraps”.

The rest of the time, the industry actively tries to HIDE its work from consumers, often pursuing reflexive or automated takedown orders if its audience tries to do its promotional work for it.

If you’re lucky you’ll be able to find a logo-strewn version ripped off a TV channel that isn’t at TOO crappy a low resolution, but even then you’re reliant on an internet connection or mobile signal if you want to actually watch it.

If it’s not one of the many videos which are watchable on PC but blocked from running on mobile formats, that is. Funnily enough, the official version of the song in the above example only just reappeared in public view on the artist’s own channel – just two weeks ago when I was searching for it, it was invisible. But even now I can’t play either the official or unofficial versions on my iPhone.

(And that’s without even going into what an increasingly-painful chore it is to use YouTube at all these days. If there’s a way I can access or link to anything in my list of Favourites now without triggering the spewing-out of the entire thing in sequence as a “playlist”, I’m buggered if I can work out what it is. And adding insult to injury, the list is full of “Deleted Video” entries with no way of knowing what they used to be so I can try to find another version.)

Why are pop videos the most tightly-restricted cultural commodity in the world? Why can’t fans of an artist buy their videos as easily as they can buy their songs? Why do record companies spend millions of dollars and huge amounts of creative energy making often-brilliant PROMOTIONAL devices which they then go out of their way to STOP anyone from seeing – let alone giving them money for – other than by watching endless hours of music TV in the vague, remote hope that a truncated, censored, ad-mangled version might just come up?

Seriously, anyone. It’s been 15 years and I’m none the wiser. What the fuck?

0 to “Revenge of the radio star”

  1. James says:

    That Wikipedia list of the most expensive pop videos is amazing. Of the ten most expensive, I can remember the gist of three of them. Four of the songs I couldn't even hum. And all it cost them (and by them, it basically means "Sony") for those ten videos was a total of $37 million. Yes, most of them are around 20 years old, but that was around the peak of my MTV watching days.

    Reply
  2. Blucey says:

    Oh God… that fucking Two Cousins video…. I watched that for DAYS.

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Ditto.

    Reply
  4. kwyjibo says:

    I don't think the chart is that odd.  People associate video with Netflix and Youtube, not iTunes or the App Store.
    I do think that monetizing music videos is difficult – most people listen to music when they're doing something else.  I've got a front facing camera on my mobile, but you won't catch me doing a video call.

    Reply
  5. RFox says:

    Ask Duran Duran…..

    Reply
  6. Rusty Shackleford says:

    " much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising "wraps"
    You probably already know this, but it bears repeating for those who don't:
    Adblock+
    Ghostery
    Fit these extensions to Firefox or Chrome and never see another YT ad again, and no, not even a video ad.
    If you use IE, well, I can't help you.

    Reply
  7. Da5e says:

    Gods, I love that Andrew WK record. You know he appeared on a Current 93 song? Guitar Wolf, too. The guy might be a genius.

    Reply
  8. Daniel Walters says:

    As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁 “

      What can I tell you? Gamers are absolutely determined not to pay for journalism, a boy’s got to eat, and there are only so many hours in the day.

      Reply
  9. joncfc says:

    SAY SUMMAT STU!

    Reply
  10. We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You've worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.  True, I wouldn't want you to skip meals or lose sleep, but I'm still always interested in what you've got to say.  Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to my own overdue blogs as well (whistles)…

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You’ve worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.”

      I’m happy just watching.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,938 Posts, 1,245,832 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Hatey McHateface on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Ah, c’moan noo. If we all lost our jobs, just because we turned up at work with a transponder aerial…Jun 29, 07:11
    • Young Lochinvar on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “HMcH Tried to reply earlier, it just didn’t appear, and I know posts at this time upset you so very…Jun 29, 01:01
    • Saffron Robe on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Excellent comment, Achnababan, which I wholeheartedly agree with. However, I wouldn’t say that there is a significant number of MSPs…Jun 29, 00:15
    • Oneliner on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “How naive. So the Holyrood spad who was caught with a transponder aerial in his gusset was acting independently. Where…Jun 28, 23:56
    • Rob on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “We are descending down the conspiracy rabbit hole now.] If you raise something the “british state” doesn’t like you will…Jun 28, 23:24
    • Hatey McHateface on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “The references to Scotland’s illustrious history as a Kingdom under a long and noble line of Scottish Kings and Queens…Jun 28, 22:16
    • Hatey McHateface on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Whispers in the shadows. “The swirl of a cape. Masked figures, partially seen in the gloom beneath smashed streetlights. The…Jun 28, 22:07
    • sarah on Off-topic: “@ Tinto, I thought Cape Verde’s example was an obvious one for Scotland to follow – their defenders and midfield…Jun 28, 22:00
    • Young Lochinvar on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Tomorrows anniversary of note; Battle of Buittle (near Dalbeattie) in 1308. Bruce’s fortunes were on the up and the fictional…Jun 28, 21:54
    • sarah on Off-topic: “Definitely fewer summer birds here near the head of Loch Broom but on the other hand a huge increase in…Jun 28, 21:53
    • sarah on Off-topic: “Thanks, aLurker. I too am a supporter of the Manifesto for Independence and cannot see why it wasn’t adopted across…Jun 28, 21:36
    • Alf Baird on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “This fits with postcolonial theory on how colonialism is enabled and protected, where the national party elite is ‘co-opted by…Jun 28, 20:25
    • GeoffC on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “We shall keenly await Murrell’s book titled “I Was The Scapegoat; Clearly”.Jun 28, 20:24
    • Hatey McHateface on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Enough already, Alf! I get it. We Scots can’t do anything because we’re pre-ordained to be doomed. We need others…Jun 28, 19:55
    • Alf Baird on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: ““form an anti-colonialism party” Postcolonial theory predicts the political process in a colony always fails the people, Hatey. Which is…Jun 28, 19:35
    • aLurker on Off-topic: “Hi all! 😉 Grand to see youse are all doin awa this fine mid summer. There has been a noticeable…Jun 28, 19:21
    • Hatey McHateface on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “@ Jay says: 28 June, 2026 at 6:18 pm Ref. my post 7:30 on 27th., there’s a school of thought…Jun 28, 19:00
    • Hatey McHateface on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Slap some micro-panels on the top of your tinfoil hat and you’ll get enough current to power a personal cooling…Jun 28, 18:33
    • Hatey McHateface on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Back in May, I did seriously hope you might learn a new tune for the next 5-year Hollyrood cycle. More…Jun 28, 18:23
    • Jay on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “McHateful, ref. your post 7:30 on 27th., if Northcode were able to pose sufficient threat to a scheme pursued by…Jun 28, 18:18
    • Luigi on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: ““So why was NS not prosecuted?” A more plausible answer may have been “Because I was instructed by my masters,…Jun 28, 17:40
    • Lee Floyd on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “I’ve said many times before. This site is unquestionably the finest investgative journalism provision anywhere in the UK. If only…Jun 28, 16:41
    • robertkknight on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/taking-action/simple-procedure/guide-to-simple-procedure/ You don’t need a fraud case to cause the SNP some fully justified inconvenience… Be certain you have proof…Jun 28, 15:28
    • Alasdair Roy on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “However unpopular it may be with my fellow followers on this site I cannot see a prosecution on the missing…Jun 28, 14:50
    • Stuart Swanston on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “The Crown Agent used many more grammatically correct complex sentences to say as little as the Deputy Chief Constable. That’s…Jun 28, 14:19
    • Alf Baird on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: ““the British State is controlling Scotland” Indeed so, and as you imply, colonial institutions are a central feature of control…Jun 28, 13:43
    • aLurker on Off-topic: “Hi Sarah. I’m a rare visitor to WoS these days, but great to see youse still alive and kicking. I…Jun 28, 13:35
    • sam on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “https://www.fraudadvisorypanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Fraud-in-Scotland-4th-ed-July2020.pdf “Common law fraud Common law fraud is the common‘catch all’ for most fraud prosecutions in Scotland. Fraud is committed…Jun 28, 12:41
    • Lorncal on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Yes, H McH: actions have consequences – so often not foreseen. Sometimes, it is actually better to let sleeping dogs…Jun 28, 12:23
    • Lorncal on Ping-Pong-Fiddle-Aye-No: “Yes, well put, except that there is no legal basis for holding a political party to account for spending funds,…Jun 28, 12:12
  • A tall tale



↑ Top