The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Revenge of the radio star

Posted on March 25, 2013 by

Something's puzzled me for more than 15 years, viewers, and an article I read today brought it back to mind, so I'm going to raise it very briefly in the hopes that someone might even now be able to answer the question for me.

There's something odd about the chart above, isn't there?

Apple makes dizzyingly vast amounts of money selling software, music and iOS apps, yet there's only a teeny tiny little broken yellow slice of that graph accounted for by videos. But hang on – don't we live in the age of video? Aren't we all walking around with amazing high-definition screens right in our pockets? So why aren't people selling us reasons to look at them?

Pop videos are one of the iconic cornerstones of modern culture. Record companies spend vast amounts of money on making promos for singles, but then – incredibly – don't offer people a way of watching them on demand.

The App Store doesn't even have a pop videos section. A couple of half-hearted streaming services offer a pitiful selection from a tiny handful of bands. I've never seen any sort of multi-artist Now That's What I Call Music Videos compilation, and very few artists ever release their own collection, certainly not while the band's still active.

Much the same goes for YouTube, which would initially seem the obvious answer. Only a microscopic percentage of videos are made available through official channels, and much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising "wraps".

The rest of the time, the industry actively tries to HIDE its work from consumers, often pursuing reflexive or automated takedown orders if its audience tries to do its promotional work for it.

If you're lucky you'll be able to find a logo-strewn version ripped off a TV channel that isn't at TOO crappy a low resolution, but even then you're reliant on an internet connection or mobile signal if you want to actually watch it.

If it's not one of the many videos which are watchable on PC but blocked from running on mobile formats, that is. Funnily enough, the official version of the song in the above example only just reappeared in public view on the artist's own channel – just two weeks ago when I was searching for it, it was invisible. But even now I can't play either the official or unofficial versions on my iPhone.

(And that's without even going into what an increasingly-painful chore it is to use YouTube at all these days. If there's a way I can access or link to anything in my list of Favourites now without triggering the spewing-out of the entire thing in sequence as a "playlist", I'm buggered if I can work out what it is. And adding insult to injury, the list is full of "Deleted Video" entries with no way of knowing what they used to be so I can try to find another version.)

Why are pop videos the most tightly-restricted cultural commodity in the world? Why can't fans of an artist buy their videos as easily as they can buy their songs? Why do record companies spend millions of dollars and huge amounts of creative energy making often-brilliant PROMOTIONAL devices which they then go out of their way to STOP anyone from seeing – let alone giving them money for – other than by watching endless hours of music TV in the vague, remote hope that a truncated, censored, ad-mangled version might just come up?

Seriously, anyone. It's been 15 years and I'm none the wiser. What the fuck?

0 to “Revenge of the radio star”

  1. James says:

    That Wikipedia list of the most expensive pop videos is amazing. Of the ten most expensive, I can remember the gist of three of them. Four of the songs I couldn't even hum. And all it cost them (and by them, it basically means "Sony") for those ten videos was a total of $37 million. Yes, most of them are around 20 years old, but that was around the peak of my MTV watching days.

    Reply
  2. Blucey says:

    Oh God… that fucking Two Cousins video…. I watched that for DAYS.

    Reply
  3. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    Ditto.

    Reply
  4. kwyjibo says:

    I don't think the chart is that odd.  People associate video with Netflix and Youtube, not iTunes or the App Store.
    I do think that monetizing music videos is difficult – most people listen to music when they're doing something else.  I've got a front facing camera on my mobile, but you won't catch me doing a video call.

    Reply
  5. RFox says:

    Ask Duran Duran…..

    Reply
  6. Rusty Shackleford says:

    " much of the time even those are hideously disfigured to the point of distracting unwatchability by advertising "wraps"
    You probably already know this, but it bears repeating for those who don't:
    Adblock+
    Ghostery
    Fit these extensions to Firefox or Chrome and never see another YT ad again, and no, not even a video ad.
    If you use IE, well, I can't help you.

    Reply
  7. Da5e says:

    Gods, I love that Andrew WK record. You know he appeared on a Current 93 song? Guitar Wolf, too. The guy might be a genius.

    Reply
  8. Daniel Walters says:

    As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “As a non-Scot, the death of this blog makes me sad 🙁

      What can I tell you? Gamers are absolutely determined not to pay for journalism, a boy’s got to eat, and there are only so many hours in the day.

      Reply
  9. joncfc says:

    SAY SUMMAT STU!

    Reply
  10. We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You've worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.  True, I wouldn't want you to skip meals or lose sleep, but I'm still always interested in what you've got to say.  Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to my own overdue blogs as well (whistles)…

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      “We still need the Rev Stuwart to snark on the impending demise of the video game industry.  You’ve worked too long and too hard not to comment on this stupid business as it self-immolates.”

      I’m happy just watching.

      Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,746 Posts, 1,216,684 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • James Cheyne on But No Cigar: “Hi Rob, Merely as an observation I have been keeping an eye on reform too, there are a few controversial…Apr 28, 12:15
    • Rob on But No Cigar: “That is nonsensical. India had its own government and viceroy because it was so far away in time and space…Apr 28, 11:58
    • James on But No Cigar: “Don’t waste keystrokes on YS. He/she/it is a half wit.Apr 28, 11:49
    • Marie on But No Cigar: “Excellent analogyApr 28, 11:39
    • Rob on But No Cigar: “I’ll need to keep an eye out for what Reform want to do with the SP, I am not really…Apr 28, 11:18
    • Aidan on But No Cigar: “It’s not that Reform’s policies don’t have any support in Scotland, it’s that Reform don’t maintain any presence in Scotland…Apr 28, 11:14
    • James Cheyne on But No Cigar: “When Britain ruled over India, it needed two governments. The main One in London and a sub-government to control the…Apr 28, 10:53
    • Yoon Scum on But No Cigar: “Have you worked out the process to deal with people born in Scotland who are faithful to the English invaders?Apr 28, 09:51
    • Yoon Scum on But No Cigar: “You KNOW that the reason Scotland is poor is due to those nasty invaders from England who are oppressing the…Apr 28, 09:50
    • Yoon Scum on Unhinged Malady: “I 100% want to be back in the EU Explain to me how leaving the UK means we are instantly…Apr 28, 09:46
    • Alf Baird on But No Cigar: “Yes, it was a colonial summit, comprising mainly those in receipt of ‘the wages of colonialism’, whose main purpose is…Apr 28, 09:04
    • Yoon Scum on But No Cigar: “Reform are mostly an anti-immigration party is there a reason that the Scots like yourself want to have open border…Apr 28, 09:04
    • Dan on But No Cigar: “Aye, but that’s the result you get with a very short campaign, a constituency boundary change, and a significant amount…Apr 28, 08:55
    • TURABDIN on But No Cigar: “REFORM is grumpy old AngloBritishness in a union jack draped mobility scooter. Scots couldn’t possibly be so intellectually challenged as…Apr 28, 08:54
    • Chas on Unhinged Malady: “744th time!Apr 28, 08:41
    • Aidan on But No Cigar: “I wonder if the SNP position vs Reform has moved on the one Karen Adam set out a few weeks…Apr 28, 08:21
    • Cuilean on The Peacemaker: “Don’t know how Garavelli looks in a mirror, without cringing with embarrassment that, yes, indeed, she is that dreadful idiot.Apr 28, 07:50
    • Frank Gillougley on But No Cigar: “The best wee colony in the world. Jack Wilson McConnell, Baron McConnell of Glenscorrodale. Why people keep voting one way…Apr 28, 07:03
    • Aidan on But No Cigar: “@Sarah – what word from New York? I asked Alf this a few days ago but I think he must…Apr 28, 06:53
    • Yoon Scum on But No Cigar: “Still waiting for someone to point out what policies that Reform hold that people object to I know some tit…Apr 28, 06:00
    • Yoon Scum on But No Cigar: “I’ll repeat this again Hopefully it might get some of you to understand I’m not afraid of leaving the union…Apr 28, 05:37
    • Yoon Scum on But No Cigar: “Read the books that Alf quotes he’s a Moon howler that bangs on about things that happened over 300 years…Apr 28, 04:54
    • Yoon Scum on But No Cigar: “Need I remind you about useless with his WHITE WHITE WHITE speech/rantApr 28, 04:43
    • Mark Beggan on But No Cigar: ““and did we tell you the name of the game boy? It’s called riding the gravy train”Apr 28, 01:56
    • agent x on But No Cigar: “HUGHES, Sally Independent 679votes 1.4%of votes 6thposition General election result.Apr 27, 23:24
    • Insider on But No Cigar: “Morgwyn… Well they were probably SNP “men” ! And what they get up to in their sheds….you really don’t want…Apr 27, 23:20
    • Andrew Kidd on But No Cigar: “The BBC ask political parties to nominate who they want to appear on QT. Parties normally share the appearances between…Apr 27, 23:11
    • Derek on But No Cigar: ““…the country they where born in…” Hmm…Apr 27, 23:07
    • sarah on But No Cigar: “Yes,gm, they are the Independents For Independence types e.g. Sally Hughes who stood in Perth at the Westminster election, and…Apr 27, 22:16
    • Jay on But No Cigar: “YS, why do you type “Marxist globalists”? Perhaps this is a new category. Marxists would usually be ANTI globalisation. As…Apr 27, 21:56
  • A tall tale



↑ Top