The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Rangers FC RIP

Posted on June 12, 2012 by

Rangers Football Club, formed in 1872, will formally cease to exist later this week. In a surprise development (in terms of its timing, not its content), HMRC have officially stated that they will reject the club’s proposed Company Voluntary Arrangement at the creditors’ meeting scheduled to take place this coming Thursday, June 14. The news was confirmed when the club’s administrators Duff & Phelps issued a press release stating their intention to go ahead with a plan to sell Rangers FC’s assets to a consortium led by businessman Charles Green for £5.5m.

There is, however, a great deal of debate about whether such  plan can go ahead. A fascinating blog by Scottish lawyer Paul McConville last week observed that HMRC had already put in place its own preferred liquidators should the CVA proposal be rejected, and it’s hard to see how Duff & Phelps can go ahead with the asset sale in the event of a legal challenge from creditors. Since HMRC has rejected the CVA and has its chosen liquidators standing ready, it seems highly likely that it, or some other creditor/s, would mount such a challenge.

There can be little doubt that the assets of Rangers FC – the playing staff and property portfolio, including Ibrox Stadium and Murray Park – ought to be able to realise significantly more than the £5.5m Green is offering. (Since the money Green proposed to use to buy the club with was in the form of a loan to be recouped from the survival and continued trading of the club, it’s also uncertain whether it’s actually on the table in any real sense.)

Even if the players’s contracts are held to be voided by the liquidation of the club (also the subject of debate) and they can move on without any transfer fees, it’s difficult to see how the property alone, even allowing for its partially- listed status, could fail to be worth at least double the supposed sale price, and the liquidators will be duty-bound to maximise the returns for creditors by at least opening the sale process up to competing bids, including those not seeking to use the property for football purposes.

Duff & Phelps and Charles Green have both insisted that despite liquidation Rangers Football Club will survive, under the same name, and continue to play at Ibrox. Such claims, stated by both parties as certainties, seem to lack any credibility. Further intriguing developments, we’re sure, are not far away.

6 to “Rangers FC RIP”

  1. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Duff and Phillips are now saying that there is a binding contract to sell the assets to a new entity under the control of Green.
     
    Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.
     
    So, how can D & P sell Rangers’ assets and at the price stated, which could be much less than could be achieved and considering that the sales price is in fact a loan and HMRC will get nowt of that?
     
    I can see this staggering through the Court of Session

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.”

    Well, not so much that I say it as that someone far better versed in Scots law than I says it, and not so much “will attempt to” as “already has”. Do read Mr McConville’s blog, it’s very informative.

    Reply
  3. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    I have been reading the blog by Mr McConville but my damn browser (Firefox) crashes when I try to follow some of the links within.
     
    Somebody is talking waffle and I suspect the it is D & P; they have form you know.
     
    The BBC is suggesting that HMRC will go for David Murray and the Whyte Night.

    I wonder if that other rumour on an earlier blog of a South African connection could have substance.
     
     
    Popcorn and a (neverending) sixpack called for.

    Reply
  4. Jim says:

    Sorry. Get facts right. The business is liquidated. Not the club or the history of the club. So take RIP and shove it as far up your ………..

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      The business is the club. The clue is in the name of the business: Rangers Football Club PLC. It’s not exactly cryptic.

      It’s all pretty academic, because one way or another there’s absolutely no chance now that any kind of Rangers is coming out of this alive. If the Appellate Tribunal doesn’t do the job and the SPL members bottle it, the dual-contracts case will fill the coffin full of nails and dump it out at sea. And even if it somehow floats back to shore staggers on like a zombie Rasputin after that, Green will sell out to Tesco, because the last thing he ever wanted was to be lumbered with a loss-making football club. It’s worth far more to him broken up for parts than anyone will ever pay for it as a going concern.

      Jim McColl and Douglas Park are worth close to a billion quid between them – £20m is pocket change. So why haven’t they just paid up if they love Rangers so much? Answer: because since the dual-contracts announcement they know it’s doomed beyond salvation. Start making alternative plans for your Saturdays.

      Reply
  5. Bandage says:

    Rangers can’t have it both ways. They want to get rid of the debt but keep thehistory. The debt was used to fraudulently buy every title since the late 80s. 

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,988 Posts, 1,252,601 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Mark Beggan on The fight about to come: “Do you have growth in your postcode? See a Doctor.” Oct 15, 00:25
    • Rob on The fight about to come: “Who is looking for perfection? Just basic competence and the feeling that they represent the majority of the country instead…” Oct 14, 22:55
    • 100%Yes on The fight about to come: “The national will feed you any story that makes you buy the paper, so your being lied to and your…” Oct 14, 22:39
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Aldi 3 YO blended whisky on your breath.” Oct 14, 20:19
    • Hatey McHateface on The fight about to come: “Aye. Right. What is it with people constantly parroting this £600,000 shite? It’s as if they never heard of bank…” Oct 14, 20:00
    • Aidan on The fight about to come: “Exactly – a “perfect” government is impossible because people will evaluate a government against different sets of values, interests and…” Oct 14, 19:56
    • SilentMajority on The fight about to come: “‘Groundhog Day’ anyone? “Our money’s all been spent I don’t know if all that’s true ‘Cause you got me and…” Oct 14, 19:08
    • Mark Beggan on The fight about to come: “Walk on with hope in your heart and growth in your postcode.” Oct 14, 18:59
    • factchecker on The fight about to come: “There has never been a perfect government, anywhere. But it is reasonably to expect competence. And it is essential to…” Oct 14, 18:18
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “🙂 🙂” Oct 14, 18:15
    • factchecker on The fight about to come: “Sarah, That is defeatism. It is perfectly simple to remove these “morons” at any election. Vote for another party. Otherwise,…” Oct 14, 18:12
    • Ex President Xiden on The fight about to come: “The good news is the SNP has a £600000 referendum fighting fund put aside. I remember them asking for donations.” Oct 14, 18:02
    • Spartan 117 on The fight about to come: “No excuse in my opinion. Voting SNP and expecting independence is like voting Tory and expecting conservatism/tax cuts/small state. If…” Oct 14, 17:49
    • Spartan 117 on The fight about to come: “Just as a clarification, my comment about “laughable agitprop fanfic” refers to The National and not Stu’s excellent blog. Sorry…” Oct 14, 17:40
    • Spartan 117 on The fight about to come: “A very naive view. The career politician is an established industry across the West now and it won’t go away.…” Oct 14, 17:37
    • Spartan 117 on The fight about to come: “Looks like (yet another) recycle of made-up front-page “headlines” as seen on the montage to the right of this page…” Oct 14, 17:28
    • am firinn on The fight about to come: “Sarah is right again. Anyone who thinks that independence must wait for a perfect Scottish Government to be achieved does…” Oct 14, 17:20
    • BLMac on The fight about to come: “Looks like the SNP have dug out the Independence Carrot from under all those Stonewall Gender Manuals. Now they’re looking…” Oct 14, 16:52
    • Aidan on The fight about to come: “Oh yeah if Scotland achieved independence at the helm they’d definitely all just resign en-mass wouldn’t they, rather than say…” Oct 14, 16:38
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “It’s so obvious, isn’t it? Why don’t the members all see it? Perhaps they do but they see no alternative…” Oct 14, 16:25
    • sarah on The fight about to come: “@ Rob, these morons will probably stay in charge until we leave the Union. They will have no hold on…” Oct 14, 16:17
    • Lollysmum on The fight about to come: “Of course Indyref2 is looming or ahead according to Keith Brown & that’s where it will always remain “ahead” as…” Oct 14, 16:11
    • Dubh on The fight about to come: “Utterly frustrating and damning in equal measure. *sigh” Oct 14, 16:04
    • Rob on The fight about to come: “It will be a cold day in hell before I would vote yes a second time while these morons are…” Oct 14, 16:01
    • Ronnie on The fight about to come: “Aye,right.” Oct 14, 15:57
    • Rogueslr on The fight about to come: “It’s like the series Seven Up, with him getting older, greyer and fatter with each passing year.” Oct 14, 15:47
    • Aidan on The fight about to come: “Shall we ‘save the date’?” Oct 14, 15:43
    • Nicky T Naquetti on The fight about to come: “Voting for “independence” (which would lead to us being being ruled by the globalist EU and IMF, the way things…” Oct 14, 15:43
    • barelybare on The fight about to come: “Will the SNP be fundraising for an indyref fund,? Surely they will need funds for it. If not, what was…” Oct 14, 15:38
    • Garrion on The fight about to come: “Boots and stamping and faces come to mind…” Oct 14, 15:36
  • A tall tale



↑ Top