The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Rangers FC RIP

Posted on June 12, 2012 by

Rangers Football Club, formed in 1872, will formally cease to exist later this week. In a surprise development (in terms of its timing, not its content), HMRC have officially stated that they will reject the club’s proposed Company Voluntary Arrangement at the creditors’ meeting scheduled to take place this coming Thursday, June 14. The news was confirmed when the club’s administrators Duff & Phelps issued a press release stating their intention to go ahead with a plan to sell Rangers FC’s assets to a consortium led by businessman Charles Green for £5.5m.

There is, however, a great deal of debate about whether such  plan can go ahead. A fascinating blog by Scottish lawyer Paul McConville last week observed that HMRC had already put in place its own preferred liquidators should the CVA proposal be rejected, and it’s hard to see how Duff & Phelps can go ahead with the asset sale in the event of a legal challenge from creditors. Since HMRC has rejected the CVA and has its chosen liquidators standing ready, it seems highly likely that it, or some other creditor/s, would mount such a challenge.

There can be little doubt that the assets of Rangers FC – the playing staff and property portfolio, including Ibrox Stadium and Murray Park – ought to be able to realise significantly more than the £5.5m Green is offering. (Since the money Green proposed to use to buy the club with was in the form of a loan to be recouped from the survival and continued trading of the club, it’s also uncertain whether it’s actually on the table in any real sense.)

Even if the players’s contracts are held to be voided by the liquidation of the club (also the subject of debate) and they can move on without any transfer fees, it’s difficult to see how the property alone, even allowing for its partially- listed status, could fail to be worth at least double the supposed sale price, and the liquidators will be duty-bound to maximise the returns for creditors by at least opening the sale process up to competing bids, including those not seeking to use the property for football purposes.

Duff & Phelps and Charles Green have both insisted that despite liquidation Rangers Football Club will survive, under the same name, and continue to play at Ibrox. Such claims, stated by both parties as certainties, seem to lack any credibility. Further intriguing developments, we’re sure, are not far away.

6 to “Rangers FC RIP”

  1. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    Duff and Phillips are now saying that there is a binding contract to sell the assets to a new entity under the control of Green.
     
    Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.
     
    So, how can D & P sell Rangers’ assets and at the price stated, which could be much less than could be achieved and considering that the sales price is in fact a loan and HMRC will get nowt of that?
     
    I can see this staggering through the Court of Session

    Reply
  2. Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

    “Rev Stu says that HMRC will attempt to appoint another liquidator, rather than D & P.”

    Well, not so much that I say it as that someone far better versed in Scots law than I says it, and not so much “will attempt to” as “already has”. Do read Mr McConville’s blog, it’s very informative.

    Reply
  3. Bugger (the Panda) says:

    I have been reading the blog by Mr McConville but my damn browser (Firefox) crashes when I try to follow some of the links within.
     
    Somebody is talking waffle and I suspect the it is D & P; they have form you know.
     
    The BBC is suggesting that HMRC will go for David Murray and the Whyte Night.

    I wonder if that other rumour on an earlier blog of a South African connection could have substance.
     
     
    Popcorn and a (neverending) sixpack called for.

    Reply
  4. Jim says:

    Sorry. Get facts right. The business is liquidated. Not the club or the history of the club. So take RIP and shove it as far up your ………..

    Reply
    • Rev. Stuart Campbell says:

      The business is the club. The clue is in the name of the business: Rangers Football Club PLC. It’s not exactly cryptic.

      It’s all pretty academic, because one way or another there’s absolutely no chance now that any kind of Rangers is coming out of this alive. If the Appellate Tribunal doesn’t do the job and the SPL members bottle it, the dual-contracts case will fill the coffin full of nails and dump it out at sea. And even if it somehow floats back to shore staggers on like a zombie Rasputin after that, Green will sell out to Tesco, because the last thing he ever wanted was to be lumbered with a loss-making football club. It’s worth far more to him broken up for parts than anyone will ever pay for it as a going concern.

      Jim McColl and Douglas Park are worth close to a billion quid between them – £20m is pocket change. So why haven’t they just paid up if they love Rangers so much? Answer: because since the dual-contracts announcement they know it’s doomed beyond salvation. Start making alternative plans for your Saturdays.

      Reply
  5. Bandage says:

    Rangers can’t have it both ways. They want to get rid of the debt but keep thehistory. The debt was used to fraudulently buy every title since the late 80s. 

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a thing that exists.

    Stats: 6,958 Posts, 1,247,693 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Alf Baird on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Worth repeating the fact that even Westminster has acknowledged that the GDP Per Capita of an independent Scotland would be…Jul 25, 23:01
    • Young Lochinvar on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Good post James.Jul 25, 22:33
    • Alf Baird on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Thanks for this Sam. I’ve met Mr and Mrs Cuthbert who are a tremendous asset to Scotland with their expert…Jul 25, 22:15
    • James on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Dan; on the “money” as always, what the Unionist Wallopers don’t want the Scotch to see: JOHN JAPPY As a…Jul 25, 22:02
    • James on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “So. The WALLOPERS have spoken. Take note, Scotch folk; you’ve never had it so good. Scotchland is the richest country…Jul 25, 21:07
    • James on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “So. Precious tactics failing, the new 77th tactic is “swamping”? Endless reams of unionist “shite” vomited up ad nauseam by…Jul 25, 20:53
    • James on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““Please note: “The Vow” did not break the law.” “Analysts from the Scottish Parliament Information Centre concluded that the fiscal…Jul 25, 20:43
    • James on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Speaking of cants….Jul 25, 20:33
    • James on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “I wish someone would get a grip of you, ya AI unionist walloper…Westminster apologist, tosser of the first order…for years…Jul 25, 20:30
    • Northcode on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Captain Caveman @3:42 pm Once again you’ve raised several points, so I’ll address them in the same way as before.…Jul 25, 19:50
    • sam on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Alf, raising taxes in an independent Scotland.A study by Jim Cuthbert which I have edited to reduce its length “Fiscal…Jul 25, 19:49
    • factchecker on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Some good news today. “…a spokesman for the Scottish government said: “Our economy is one of the best performing parts…Jul 25, 18:41
    • Spartan 117 on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Few things worse in life than “Socialists” who at the slightest sniff of power dig in and engorge themselves at…Jul 25, 18:23
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Alf Re your wish list at 4:08. Surely the most third-rate economist would understand that the feasibility and profitability of…Jul 25, 18:11
    • Hatey McHateface on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Some great comments today. There remains but for Wally W. Walrus to expectorate partly masticated rotting fish guts over it…Jul 25, 17:50
    • Young Lochinvar on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “On a cheerier note. Listening to Smooth Radio the hourly newsreader had me smiling, for all the world her rendition…Jul 25, 16:37
    • Aidan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““ By definition, it is surely a rhetorical question also, since I am hardly likely to have published work on…Jul 25, 16:32
    • Aidan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Alf – firstly, that is a description of (in your own terms) how GDP growth could be delivered, it’s not…Jul 25, 16:29
    • Alf Baird on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““Scotland’s output would double” Near neighbour high-GDP sovereign states with similar or far lesser resources illustrate that a major increase…Jul 25, 16:08
    • Captain Caveman on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““So who do we believe?” 😀 😀 😀 And on that bombshell, time for a Negroni I think. Saluti! 🙂Jul 25, 16:02
    • Aidan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Indeed Dan – it’s a case of: – the independently audited figures show one thing; – the (former) head of…Jul 25, 15:51
    • Aidan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Indeed Dan – it’s a case of: – the independently audited figures show one thing; – the (former) head of…Jul 25, 15:51
    • Captain Caveman on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Northy “First, questioning someone’s published work isn’t a demand for credentials; it’s very often a request for clarity about the…Jul 25, 15:42
    • Dan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “Waiting on new boys CC and AIdan pulling up Stu for posting this “shite” back in the day… https://wingsoverscotland.com/on-our-own-two-feet/Jul 25, 15:33
    • Aidan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Alf – I’ve published work on a range of subjects, but my work, unlike yours, isn’t written starting with the…Jul 25, 15:02
    • Aidan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Alf – Scotland’s GDP per capita is around the same as neighbouring countries like Finland and Belgium, and above almost…Jul 25, 14:49
    • Captain Caveman on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “*what has MEAN per capita have to do with “rich”Jul 25, 14:44
    • Aidan on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Confused – comedy gold from someone who thinks that incorporating a network of companies makes any person or enterprise “tax…Jul 25, 14:44
    • Captain Caveman on Ain’t it funny how things change?: ““So that’s a big ‘naw’ then, ye’ve nivver published hee-haw aboot onythin.” Heh. Well, I’ve written countless landmark technical reports…Jul 25, 14:35
    • Captain Caveman on Ain’t it funny how things change?: “@Alf What has per capita GDP got to do with being “rich”? Especially if comparing the UK (and by extension…Jul 25, 14:32
  • A tall tale



↑ Top