The world's most-read Scottish politics website

Wings Over Scotland


Quoted for truth #9

Posted on February 24, 2013 by

A powerful reality check from Iain Macwhirter in the Sunday Herald:

“Scotland bailed out the UK economy in the 1980s with Scottish oil revenues, and received precious little in return except factory closures and the highest mortality rates in Europe. And it doesn’t take a genius to see that any improvement in the UK economy is going to happen in London and the southeast, rather than in Scotland. Like the high-speed rail link, it might eventually extend to Manchester but no further. Scotland is on its own whether it likes it or not.”

31 to “Quoted for truth #9”

  1. MajorBloodnok says:

    A great article from Macwhirter.  I was just reading it through about the real state of the UK economy and how we’ve not had anything like this since the late nineteenth century and then the last two paragraphs just bring it all into focus and say yes there is a way out of this if we chose to take it.

    Reply
  2. And this is the guy who was saying only the other week that he could think of a dozen positive reasons for keeping the union together???

    Reply
  3. CameronB says:

    Is this more than the Herald or Macwhirter sticking a finger in the air?

    Reply
  4. Marcia says:

    His blog has a good article about energy and LGO (Light go out) scare story etc etc
     
    link to iainmacwhirter2.blogspot.co.uk

    Reply
  5. CameronB says:

    @ Marcia
    Close thing, but you get the prize for first posting.

    Reply
  6. ianbrotherhood says:

    Shades of Max Keiser in the language Macwhirter’s using – has someone rattled his cage?

    Reply
  7. Baheid says:

    I remember something about Macwhirter not as appearing as much,(seems not at all now), on Newsnicht Scotland because of his leaning towards independence.
    I don’t think it was rumours, think it was official discussions within bbc scot.

    Reply
  8. DanTDog says:

    I’ve regularly thought Iain McWhirter one of the more thoughtful commentators on the Scottish spectrum, although not always aligned to my own viewpoint… if he’s beginning to see things from a more positive “Yes” perspective, that can only be welcomed…!

    Reply
  9. Baheid says:

    ianbrotherhood says:
    Shades of Max Keiser in the language Macwhirter’s using – has someone rattled his cage? 

    Max Keiser, will we get the likes of Keiser, Hartmann etc. on the Scottish broadcaster’s channel.
    Really annoys me when l watch these people knowing we have nothing like them, in general, to inform/debate. 

    Reply
  10. Morag says:

    Keiser?  I’d rather have someone credible who isn’t promoting a scam.

    Reply
  11. CameronB says:

    Scam?

    Reply
  12. Baheid says:

    Scam?, have no idea where that one comes from

    Reply
  13. Morag says:

    He is promoting a questionable economic theory which furthers his own economic self-interest.  Specifically GoldMoney.

    Reply
  14. Dcanmore says:

    Independence is a decision that’s going to hit a lot of Scottish people not because they support it, because for them it’s the only option. Iain McWhirter is coming to this conclusion, he now knows that further devolution or a federal UK set up is a pipe dream. It is hitting home now that the UK is sinking and the more that people realise that Westminster is only interested in protecting London, with its perpetual multi-billion £ projects and protection for the City bankers, then Independence for Scotland is the only choice. The consequences of a NO vote is becoming clearer in each passing month and is looking more horrific. There is a global battle going on with governments, treasuries and banks, but true to form Westminster will use Scotland as cannon fodder, stripping away every ounce of resources to prop up a failing State while the Scottish people will be left on the scrap heap for another couple of generations once again, being told to accept it because you’re British and it’s your moral duty.

    Reply
  15. CameronB says:

    I am no supporter of Keiser, but he is not a lone voice in the financial community. He is also quite open about his interests. Could I stick my neck out and suggest he has a better understanding of the issues than any of us?

    Has neo-liberalism worked?

    Reply
  16. Morag says:

    This is beginning to remind me of the early months of 2011.  I had planned to go out campaigning for the SNP because that’s what I do.  By the time April arrived, I realised it was more than that.  I was literally terrified of what would happen if Labour got back in and Iain Gray was First Minister.  Give me more leaflets, when as we campaigning in the town centre, is there anything else I can do….
     
    I’ve wanted independence since I was a child.  Now it’s more than that.  I am literally terrified of having to go on living in the UK as it has become.  I never, never thought I would say that.

    Reply
  17. Craig P says:

    MacWhirter has always been a unionist, but a soft unionist, and he thinks about the future more than most journalists in Scotland. For example he was warning about house prices beingunsustainable and a financial crash for two or three years before it actually happened. Got a lot of time for MacWhirter, I suspect he will eventually go the way of Ruth Wishart and declare for yes, anybody who thinks long enough about the issue tends to find that being the conclusion. He also ha a great phrase about the relationship between England and Scotland, still connected, he said, but being pulled apart like pieces of pizza connected by strings ofcheese alone…

    Reply
  18. cath says:

    Morag: “I’ve wanted independence since I was a child. Now it’s more than that.”

    I’ve gone the same way, Morag though to and from different places. I’ve always vaguely thought Scotland should be independent, and not quite understood why we weren’t. But I always accepted that was just the way it was, and I never cared enough for it to be any part of my politial or emotional life.

    But then after growing up with Thatcher, we finally got New Labour and they were dire – Iraq, house price bubble, debt, PFI, banking crisis. And the same preference for putting the rich over the poor as the Tories.

    Now, it wouldn’t matter where in the UK I was based, I’d be despairing about the direction of the UK and Westminster’s ability or will to change anything, or shift direction.

    In Scotland though, we have a chance for real change, to break away from that AND to do it by becoming the sovereign nation we always should have been. I could easily  have been persuaded to federalism, purely to stop a divisise debate and not have to debate “independence” with friends and family in England who will be seeing it reported very negatively.

    But that’s not on the table, so I just can’t understand anyone not being pro-indy now. Who would seriously argue Westminster’s doing a great job and independence isn’t a good thing for a country? So as time goes by, I find I’m getting more and more depressed by the thought of what waking up after a no vote would feel like. I dread that utterly, similarly to you, in a way I wouldn’t have imagined last year.
     

    Reply
  19. Baheid says:

    Morag says:
    He is promoting a questionable economic theory which furthers his own economic self-interest.  Specifically GoldMoney.
     
    I know, that’s why China buys a couple of hundred tons of gold every few months, ( sell as little as 20% of what they mine),
    Germany won’t their gold delivered out of the US fed vaults, (that’s if it is still there!!?),  
    India and others are buying/selling commodities using gold etc etc.
    J P Morgan and their mates are being accused of manipulating the gold & silver prices; I wonder why they would be doing that!? (Self interest pertaining to the dollar, surely not)

    Reply
  20. Morag says:

    Oh, hitch your wagon to his star if you like.  Just don’t run away with the idea that he’s some respected guru.

    Reply
  21. Baheid says:

    I have no guru’s

    Mr broon sold half our gold reserves, that’s clever ?
    And he sold at an all time low in the market, really clever ?
    Why not sell the rest, awfy clever

    Aye right

    Reply
  22. Simon says:

    Yes I am also not a wild fan of Keiser, but given the choice between his analysis, or the instiutions of economic governance that we have in the central bank and government, I know which I would be more likely to label a “scam”.

    Reply
  23. ayemachrihanish says:

    Slightly O/T – The link below – is what Westminster do not wish the Scots to know. The fact that an Independent Scotland would immediately get access to the funding and support to create the rail infrastructure that would provide direct access – (not change at London access) to an  integrated Pan -EU railway network.
     
    The European Commission today announced a comprehensive package of measures to deliver better quality and more choice in railway services in Europe. 
     
    Brussels, 30 January 2013
     
    link to europa.eu
     
    Vice President Siim Kallas, European Commission Vice President responsible for Transport said: “Europe’s railways are approaching a very important junction. Faced with stagnation or decline in rail in many markets across Europe, we have a simple choice. We can take the tough decisions now that are needed to restructure Europe’s railway market to encourage innovation and the provision of better services. Rail will be able to grow again to the benefit of citizens, business and the environment”.
     

    Reply
  24. scotchman says:

    Any chance of posting this article on your site? Can’t access it on Herald page.

    Reply
  25. Luigi says:

    It is rumoured that Broon had no choice to sell the gold. The UK were in a bit of a fix because they had been looking after German gold and the Germans decided they wanted it back. Surprise surprise, it wasn’t there any more! Not sure about the exact detail, but the end result was a massive sell-off of British gold. Of course it was spun by Broon as a great move – all those valuable bonds and paper derivatives, worth much more than gold! 

    Reply
  26. ayemachrihanish says:

    The EU aim (and has been for years) is that all member capitals are linked by a high speed rail network. Currently London provide that tick in a box. But an independent Scotland would require Edinburgh to be directly part of that network.  Seperately, an independent Scotland provides the means (via a new link) for Dublin to do likewise.

    Reply
  27. scotchman says:

    Thanks Rev – cookies devoured.
    Macwhirter is increasingly a voice of reason, shedding light on the debate. rUK heading down the pan – do we follow on the grounds of moral support, or save ourselves?
    No brainer…..

    Reply
  28. Chic McGregor says:

    My comment on his blog:
     
    Iain,
    While the Scottish government energy policy is by no means perfect, it is infinitely saner than the UK. You ask where price hikes are comming from, I will give you one of the biggest examples.

    Please study the following map carefully. It comes from the EEA, the European Environmental Agency. I know the data are somewhat dated, but in the context of comparison and conclusions one might draw from it, that is not important. It depicts the expected cost per unit (kWh) of elctricity production from windpower which are largely a function of terrain type and average wind speed – in that order in NW Europe. It does not include grid support costs as that varies enormously due to how remote from centres of use the wind farms are.

    link to i51.photobucket.com

    What I want you to note is:

    1) The British Isles, including England, is slap bang in the lowest cost band for ON shore wind production along with Denmark, Far North of Germany and Southern Sweden.

    2) The cost of OFF shore wind power compared to ON shore British Isles is TWICE AS MUCH.

    3) The Highlands of Scotland are not as commercially attractive even discounting extra griding costs.

    OK, got that?

    Next,I want you to look at the following chart. This is also based on EEA data but which are kept up to date so only about a year or two old. It shows the actual installed ON shore wind capacity of various countries in the Europe. To take account of the varying size of country, it has been normalized to population by calculating installed capacity per million people.

    link to i51.photobucket.com

    Note the extraordinary extent to which English NIMBYISM has been indulged.

    It has been described by a European wind power expert as “Being like a Saudi Arabia which refuses to drill for oil”.

    Now take on board the fact that England already has more OFF shore wind generation than the rest of the world put together and is planning up to 35 GW in total.

    Think what that means for electricity prices in the UK.

    That is why no other country, even Green Party lobbied environmentally mad Germany has considered serious OFF shore development until they had filled the place up with ON shore.

    Note, I am not at all saying that it is not right that we should have OFF shore, but it is commercially insane to do so until you need to.

    UK leccy bill payers (or tax payers if they disguise things by “subsidy”, “tariffs” or whatever ) will have a very high price to pay in order to indulge English NIMBYISM.

    Nuclear, again is even more costly but we’ll leave the above to sink in for now.

    Reply
  29. Chic McGregor says:

    @Luigi
    It is the Federal Reserve in the USA which is suspected by some of no longer having the gold they were holding for Germany and other countries.
     
    Brown, allegedly sold the gold at a 20 year low to depress gold prices so the main American traders who were exposed, could buy at reduced price.
     
     

    Reply
  30. Jeannie says:

    @ayemacrihanish
    Thanks for the link re the rail networks.  That’s an incredibly important piece of information and invaluable in persuading the business communities of the benefits of independence.  I’ve re-posted it on Facebook.   We should all do that.  It’s just one of those things Westminster can’t argue with as the money won’t come from them.  Git postin!

    Reply


Comment - please read this page for comment rules. HTML tags like <i> and <b> are permitted. Use paragraph breaks in long comments. DO NOT SIGN YOUR COMMENTS, either with a name or a slogan. If your comment does not appear immediately, DO NOT REPOST IT. Ignore these rules and I WILL KILL YOU WITH HAMMERS.


  • About

    Wings Over Scotland is a (mainly) Scottish political media digest and monitor, which also offers its own commentary. (More)

    Stats: 6,747 Posts, 1,216,841 Comments

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • Young Lochinvar on The Takeover: “Wow! Something got shook loose there!! Fat? Seen many Anglos recently? Clearly not! Go to Benidorm and view the Engerlund…Apr 30, 01:15
    • Young Lochinvar on The Takeover: “Andrew Sorry, I disagree. Good points are being made and “BTL” post protocols aside it gets asinine with folk “wanging…Apr 30, 00:49
    • Geri on The Takeover: “I’d bet a pound to a pile of shite there is an Englishman there in the thick of it all.…Apr 30, 00:17
    • James on The Takeover: “AH! A “Carol”. Where did you appear from, poppet? Diversity! The 77th now have a laydee poster. Or is wee…Apr 30, 00:11
    • James on The Takeover: ““Chas” (lol) “How come so many nutters contribute to the ‘comments section’ on Wings?” Go on “Chas”, Look in a…Apr 30, 00:03
    • Geri on The Takeover: “GM They’re making a big deal of it because colonialism thrives on division & conflict & sectarianism is their favourite…Apr 29, 23:49
    • Geri on The Takeover: “James Cheyne I’m so sorry for your loss. I hope you are okay. Sending you hugs at this difficult time…Apr 29, 23:31
    • GM on The Takeover: “Hatey McHateface says: 29 April, 2025 at 9:16 pm You are being taken for a fool.. Could be! Political Islam…Apr 29, 22:51
    • Yoon Scum on The Takeover: “Chas Are you saying that we can’t cast a magic spell while wearing the holy tartan cap and holding up…Apr 29, 21:17
    • Hatey McHateface on The Takeover: ““The Muslims from Scotland that I know are Scottish. No question” Yet only a few posts above, we have Alf…Apr 29, 21:16
    • GM on The Takeover: “Aye, f all to do with being muslim. I am slightly puzzled why they are making a big deal out…Apr 29, 20:59
    • Chas on The Takeover: “Sadly Cheyne is not alone in posting repetitive pish. There are too many living in the past banging on about…Apr 29, 20:48
    • Bilbo on The Takeover: “Who controls the past, controls the future.Apr 29, 20:27
    • GM on The Takeover: “NO.Definitely not Bilbo. Hopefully copying the USA is at the start of being on its way ootApr 29, 20:27
    • GM on The Takeover: “The Muslims from Scotland that I know are Scottish. No question and the ones I know from abroad don’t exhibit…Apr 29, 20:11
    • Hatey McHateface on The Takeover: “You’re wasting your time on the right side of history, Marie. The left side of history is where all the…Apr 29, 19:59
    • carol Neill on The Takeover: “Much as I am sympathetic with James cheynes recent loss I am not missing their posts Same shit all day…Apr 29, 19:52
    • Bilbo on The Takeover: “Never heard of the band until recently. They sound like the Northern Irish version of the Bearsden and Milngavie scheme…Apr 29, 19:43
    • Andrew scott on The Takeover: “James cheyne off on his (not missed) rants which have ZERO to do with revs post Stick to the post…Apr 29, 19:23
    • Nae Need! on The Takeover: “@Yoonscum “The problem with that argument is it kind of ignores the actions of the current Scottish government Who have…Apr 29, 19:21
    • James Cheyne on The Takeover: “Further explanation for those whom are not aware, The Anglo – Irish treaty in 1801 was when the Westminster parliament…Apr 29, 19:05
    • James Cheyne on The Takeover: “And of course the treaty of union in particular mentions no other people in the treaty of union with England…Apr 29, 19:01
    • James Cheyne on The Takeover: “Hi james, That be a contentious point as Scots law was to remain separate. And by allowing Scotland to pass…Apr 29, 18:42
    • Aidan on The Takeover: “@James – laws passed by Holyrood are secondary legislation passed in accordance with the powers laid out in the Scotland…Apr 29, 17:44
    • Marie on The Takeover: “Kneecap shouldn’t have said what they said – doesn’t stop them from being on the right side of history though.Apr 29, 16:55
    • James Cheyne on The Takeover: “Alf. As a observation it is noted under the legal construction of Britain that only a Sovereign parliament can pass…Apr 29, 15:24
    • YOON scum on The Takeover: “After Indy Will yoons be allowed to voteApr 29, 15:10
    • James Cheyne on The Takeover: “Alf, What you state has become quite evident over recent years in as much that the treaty of union can…Apr 29, 14:57
    • James Cheyne on But No Cigar: “Rob. I think the same, A devolved Scottish parliament from Westminster should not be passing Scots laws. Two parliaments in…Apr 29, 14:38
    • Alf Baird on The Takeover: “Yes, one of the features of a colonial society and “its dependency psychology is that since no one can serve…Apr 29, 14:24
  • A tall tale



↑ Top